Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

PPS NO.

MILESTONES

OPEN DATE

CLOSE DATE

SIGN OFF

SIGN OFF
IMPROVEMENT TEAM MEMBERS

LEADER

TITLE
STEP 1 PROBLEM CLARIFICATION Current Condition
1 2
3 4

STEP 7a

ROOT CAUSE IDENTIFICATION

Problem Identification / Information WHO WHEN WHERE WHAT HOW OTHER STEP 2 HOW WHERE STEP 3 & 4 CONTAINMENT
Customer Customer Process Process Other Other

Ideal / Standard Condition

Therefore

WHY ?

Problem Statement Therefore WHY ?

WHO WHEN

Customer Customer

Process Process

Other Other

Therefore

WHY ?

POINT OF CAUSE & ANALYSIS OF CURRENT SITUATION

Therefore

WHY ?

Therefore

WHY ?

Therefore

WHY ?

STEP 7b

ROOT CAUSE

STEP 8

COUNTER MEASURE EVALUATION

Summary of Problem to Pursue

STEP 5

TARGET CONDITION

STEP 6
O

DIRECT CAUSE INVESTIGATION

STEP 9
T
Potential cause investigated , confirmed as a contributor

COUNTER MEASURE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Potential cause investigated & confirmed ok to standard or dismissed based on fact

Potential cause investigated & confirmed as direct cause

MAN

METHOD

STEP 10

CHECK COUNTER MEASURES (MONITOR)

PROBLEM to PURSUE

ENVIRONMENT

STEP 11

FEED BACK / FEED FORWARD SHARE

STANDARDISATION

MACHINE

MATERIAL

PPS NO. MILESTONES

OPEN DATE

CLOSE DATE

SIGN OFF

SIGN OFF
IMPROVEMENT TEAM MEMBERS

LEADER

TITLE
STEP 1 PROBLEM CLARIFICATION

Write down a title for the investigation which should be your basic, initial understanding of the issue
STEP 7a Current Condition
1 2
3 4

ROOT CAUSE IDENTIFICATION - (Take direct causes & "dig deep" by continually asking WHY & using logical small steps supported with factual investigation. 5 why should read back logically when using "therefore." Each statement should be concise).

Problem Identification / Information WHO WHEN WHERE WHAT HOW OTHER STEP 2 HOW WHERE STEP 3 & 4 CONTAINMENT
Customer Customer Process Process Other Other

Ideal / Standard Condition

Describe the current / actual condition and visually show the GAP to the standard/ideal condition again using pictures and/or graphs
Problem Statement

Therefore

WHY ?

Therefore

WHY ?

WHO WHEN

Customer Customer

Process Process

Other Other

Therefore

WHY ?

Therefore

WHY ?

POINT OF CAUSE & ANALYSIS OF CURRENT SITUATION

Therefore

WHY ?

Therefore

WHY ?

STEP 7b

ROOT CAUSE-The root cause should be shown as a clear statement (copy last why).As a minimum the root cause should lead to a c/m which will prevent re-occurrence of the concern at the process (Ideally it should address the bigger reason for failure ie system or proceedure failure)

Track back from where the problem was identified to the point at which the problem can first be witnessed or understood to be created, then visually represent the flow Breakdown the problem using fact and data. Use graphs and charts to visualise the information

STEP 8

COUNTER MEASURE EVALUATION

Summary of Problem to Pursue

After initial problem investigation / data analysis, this should be a clear statement of the specific problem the team are going to ttackle

All counter measures should logically link to the root cause. Each counter measure should be evaluated in turn and items such as; safety, quality, cost, risk, leadtime, etc should be considered to decide the most appropriate counter measure to implement

STEP 5

TARGET CONDITION

Set a SMART Target

STEP 6
O

DIRECT CAUSE INVESTIGATION Visit point of cause & brain storm with all PPS team members + process members to identify as many potential direct causes as possible. Then systematically investigate each potential direct
cause

STEP 9

COUNTER MEASURE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Potential cause investigated & confirmed ok to standard or dismissed based on fact

Potential cause investigated , confirmed as a contributor

Potential cause investigated & confirmed as direct cause

MAN

METHOD

A schedule showing the actual implementation status of the counter measures versus the plan should be made. As a minumum this schedule should include the; activities to be carried out, the time frame, the responsible person and the due date.

STEP 10

CHECK COUNTER MEASURES (MONITOR)

PROBLEM to PURSUE

The counter measures should be checked by considering both the results and the process. The results should be confirmed versus the original set target (STEP 5) and the standard condition (STEP 1) to understand if the GAP has been effectively closed.

ENVIRONMENT

Each counter measure should be checked using an appropriate KPI to ensure that the counter measure has been successfully implemented and is being sustained. Both the result and process measures should be conducted over a suitable time frame to ensure sustainability and no reoccurence.

-Make defect description more specific than problem statement based on facts from "grasping the situation" -show evidence of team brainstorm at point of cause

STEP 11

FEED BACK / FEED FORWARD (Similar parts, processes, systems or new projects) SHARE

STANDARDISATION

-Show Lateral thinking -Investigate & judge each potential cause.Show evidence that evaluation of potential causes has been carried out by Comparing actual condition to std) -Identify the direct causes & then link them to 5 WHY by using corresponding numbers

After confirming successful implementation via the results and process KPI's we should ensure that the improved process is standardise. We should then detail this standard so that it can be applied to other problems where applicable

Finally we should consider our key learning points from the problem solving activity and detail them for other to review. We should then actively seek to share this report/activity and its learning points with other in the organisation so they can benefit from our experiences

MACHINE

MATERIAL

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen