Digital E-Book Showing What Many Call A Chief Doctrine of Christendom Is Really False: This e-book has as its

purpose to show what the Bible truth is with regard to a doctrine that many consider a chief doctrine of Christendom, but this book expos es it as NOT in agreement with the inspired word of Almighty God (YHWH). This w ill be done in two parts. The First will take the appropriate parts of The Westminster Confession of faith was written by one Cornelius Burges, Assessor to the Westminster Assembly, in 1 646. It will show that every scripture he referred to was taken out of context. The Second will give many Bible scriptures that clearly show this doctrine can N OT be true which all can check for themselves in their own Bible. Table of Contents: Part One: INTRODUCTION TO THE WESTMINSTER CONFESSION OF FAITH AS NOTHING BUT A HERMENEUTIC METHODOLOGY TO WRONGLY BACK-UP A MYTH/FALSE DOCTRINE: I FIRST AND SECOND PART OF A CLEVER DECEPTION III SECTION THREE, THE GREAT DECEPTION IV APPENDIX TO COMMENTARY ON 1 JOHN 5:7 <<Sub Section 'O' Commentaries on the Scriptures>> <<Sub Section 'P' Commentaries on the Scriptures>> <<Sub Section 'Q' Commentaries on the Scriptures>> <CONCLUSION> (section only) V REFERENCES: Part Two: INTRODUCTION, covering many Bible scriptures that clearly show this doctrine can NOT be true which all can check for themselves in their own Bible. I FIRST, IT SAYS AT MANY PLACES THE FOLLOWING: II THE BIBLE EXPLICITLY SAYS: III THE BIBLE EXPLICITLY SHOWS JESUS (YESHUA) ASKING HIS FATHER, ALMIGHTY GOD (Y HWH) TO GLORIFY HIM IN A PRAYER AS FOLLOWS: IV THE BIBLE CLEARLY SAYS "AND BEING FOUND IN FASHION AS A MAN, HE HUMBLED HIMSE LF, AND BECAME OBEDIENT UNTO DEATH, EVEN THE DEATH OF THE CROSS."THIS SCRIPTURE CLEARLY SHOWS JESUS (YESHUA) TO BE AN OBEDIENT SON TO HIS FATHER (YHWH). V AS WE ALL KNOW THE GIVER AND THE RECEIVER CAN NOT BE THE SAME, THE BIBLE SHOWS THAT JESUS (YESHUA) WAS GIVEN POWER BY HIS FATHER (YHWH). VI JESUS (YESHUA) CLEARLY SAID HE COULD DO NOTHING OF HIS OWN INITIATIVE, BUT ON LY WHAT HE BEHOLDS THE FATHER (YHWH) DOING:

VII NOW THE BIBLE EXPLICITLY SHOWS THE CHAIN-OF-COMMAND; FROM ALMIGHTY GOD (YHWH ) ON DOWN AS FOLLOWS: Part Three: THE TRINITY OF THREE SCRIPTURES DESTROYS THE MYTH OF THE TRINITY: The E-Book INTRODUCTION TO THE WESTMINSTER CONFESSION OF FAITH AS NOTHING BUT A HERMENEUTIC METHODOLOGY TO WRONGLY BACK-UP A MYTH/FALSE DOCTRINE: The Westminster Confession of faith was written by one Cornelius Burges, Assesso r to the Westminster Assembly, in 1646. He was a very skilled individual with respect twisting the scriptures and chose hermeneutic methodology over 'Sola Scr iptura' methodology as hermeneutic methodology was well suited for twisting the scripture to eloquently make it appear that the Word of God supported what ever you wanted it to; whereas, this could NOT be done with 'Sola Scripture' methodol ogy unless it was greatly distorted and no longer true 'Sola Scriptura' methodol ogy. In Section 2 of the Westminister Confession of faith dealing with the Trinity my th which he supported, he did a masterpiece of deception in obfuscating the Word of God to make it appear that it backed his favorite myth/false doctrine of th e Trinity which of course it does not. In fact, nowhere does the word Trinity even appear in the Bible, as was noted by the International Encyclopedia of the Bible (*1). He carefully crafted his deception in three parts, the first, 'The re is but one only living, and true God:' is true and designed to throw one off guard to the deception to follow in the last part of Section 2, clever as is the deception of any con man. The second part, 'God hath all life,(a) glory,(b) g oodness,(c) blessedness,(d) in and of Himself;' is likewise basically true, but with some very subtle deception or twisting in it designed to develop the reader s confidence so the reader will gulp down the God (YHWH) dishonoring false doctr ine and myth of the third part as Truth which of course it is anything but. I FIRST AND SECOND PART OF A CLEVER DECEPTION I. & II. There is but one only,(a) living, and true God:(b) who is infinite in b eing and perfection,(c) a most pure spirit,(d) invisible,(e) without body, parts ,(f) or passions,(g) immutable,(h) immense,(i) eternal,(k) incomprehensible,(l) almighty,(m) most wise,(n) most holy,(o) most free,(p) most absolute,(q) working all things according to the counsel of His own immutable and most righteous wil l,(r) for His own glory;(s) most loving,(t) gracious, merciful, long-suffering, abundant in goodness and truth, forgiving iniquity, transgression, and sin;(u) t he rewarder of them that diligently seek Him;(w) and withal, most just and terri ble in His judgments,(x) hating all sin,(y) and who will by no means clear the g uilty.(z) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) Deut. 6:4; I Cor. 8:4, 6. I Thess. 1:9; Jer. 10:10. Job 11:7, 8, 9; Job 26:14. John 4:24. I Tim. 1:17. Deut. 4:15, 16; John 4:24, with Luke 24:39. Acts 14:11, 15. James 1:17; Mal. 3:6. I Kings 8:27; Jer. 23:23, 24.

(k) (l) (m) (n) (o) (p) (q) (r) (s) (t) (u) (w) (x) (y) (z)

Ps. 90:2; I Tim. 1:17. Ps. 145:3. Gen. 17:1; Rev. 4:8. Rom. 16:27. Isa. 6:3; Rev. 4:8. Ps. 115:3. Exod. 3:14. Eph. 1:11. Prov. 16:4; Rom. 11:36. I John 4:8, 16. Exod. 34:6, 7. Heb. 11:6. Neh. 9:32, 33. Ps. 5:5, 6. Nah. 1:2, 3; Exod. 34:7.

II. God hath all life,(a) glory,(b) goodness,(c) blessedness,(d) in and of Himse lf; and is alone in and unto Himself all-sufficient, not standing in need of any creatures which He hath made,(e) nor deriving any glory from them,(f) but only manifesting His own glory in, by, unto, and upon them: He is the alone fountain of all being, of whom, through whom, and to whom are all things;(g) and hath mos t sovereign dominion over them, to do by them, for them, or upon them whatsoever Himself pleaseth.(h) In His sight all things are open and manifest;(i) His know ledge is infinite, infallible, and independent upon the creature,(k) so as nothi ng is to Him contingent, or uncertain.(l) He is most holy in all His counsels, i n all His works, and in all His commands.(m) To Him is due from angels and men, and every other creature, whatsoever worship, service, or obedience He is please d to require of them.(n) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (k) (l) (m) (n) John 5:26. Acts 7:2. Ps. 119:68. I Tim. 6:15; Rom. 9:5. Acts 17:24, 25. Job 22:2, 3. Rom 11:36. Rev. 4:11; I Tim. 6:15; Dan. 4:25, 35. Heb. 4:13. Rom. 11:33, 34; Ps. 147:5. Acts 15:18; Ezek. 11:5. Ps. 145:17; Rom. 7:12. Rev. 5:12, 13, 14.

Please note his reference to scripture in both part 1 and 2 designed to gain the readers confidence who does not realize the difference between hermeneutic meth odology which is usually used to twist and true 'Sola Scriptura' methodology whi ch is designed to bring out Bible Truths or to let the Bible interpret itself pe r 2 Peter 1:20, "Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.," (Authorized King James Bible; AV). Also, please bea r in mind the following two scriptures from the Old Testament when we next discu ss Section 3 and think why they show this whole section is error. These script ures are: Psalm 80:17 "Let thy hand be upon the MAN of thy right hand, upon the son of ma n whom thou madest strong for thyself." (AV). In Colossians 3:1 "If ye then be risen with Christ, seek those things which are above, where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God." (AV). Now just thing, If Jesus Christ sits on the right hand of God, then he must be t

he MAN mentioned in Psalm 80:17. And if Jesus Christ is the MAN that sits on the right hand of God...., obviously Cornelius Burges, Assessor to the Westminster Assembly, is a deceptive twister and all he says is to be rejected as the God (Y HWH) dishonoring teaching of mankind warned against at Titus 1:10-11, "For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcis ion: 11 Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake." (AV); remember many false proph ets like Cornelius Burgess, per 1 John 4:1, "Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gon e out into the world." (AV). III SECTION THREE, THE GREAT DECEPTION Section three shall be covered by first presenting exactly what the deceiver Cor nelius Burgess wrote, and the scriptures he used in a hermeneutics methodology w ay of deceiving to seemingly back up the false doctrine and myth he was presenti ng. Then, each scripture he used in his deception will be commented on individu ally to show its true Biblical significance as the Word of God so all will be ab le to understand how Cornelius Burgess was being deceitful and twisting the Word of God. In the unity of the Godhead there be three persons, of one substance, power, and eternity; God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost.(o) The Father is of none, neither begotten, nor proceeding: the Son is eternally begotten of the Father:(p) the Holy Ghost eternally proceeding from the Father and the Son.(q) (o) I John 5:7; Matt. 3:16, 17; Matt. 28:19; II Cor. 13:14. (p) John 1:14, 18. (q) John 15:26; Gal. 4:6. Now we shall deal with each scripture individually by section: <<Sub Section 'O' Commentaries on the Scriptures>> The first scripture, the deceiver Cornelius Burgess used was an added to scriptu re of 1 John 5:7 as contained in the Authorized King James Bible which is the mo st well known intentional distortion of scripture in the entire Bible, what lack of integrity and honesty: Commentary on 1 John 5:7: 1 John 5:7 "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the wor d, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one." (Authorized King James: AV) 1 John 5:7 "And there are Three who give testimony in heaven, the Father, the W ord, and the Holy Ghost. And these three are one." (Douay-Rheims Catholic Bible ) 1 John 5:7 " For there are three that testify:" (New American Standard Bible: NA SB) 1 John 5:7 "There are three that testify:" (New Revised Standard Version; NRSV) 1 John 5:7 "quia tres sunt qui testimonium dant (The Latin Vulgate) As one can clearly see these three scriptures all of 1 John 5:7, are quite diffe rent, now why is this? Let's find out! Many say 1 John 5:7 is the center masterpiece for the concept of the Trinity, i. e., the center or sustaining gem so to speak of this doctrine. One such follow

s: This is the only passage in the whole Bible that gives any color to the trinity or "oneness" doctrines. It is the central crystal of the Christian faith upon which we hold the blessed trinity to be ever eternal self-evident to all. [Catho lic pamphlet from 1903] Now for this to be true, the Authorized King James and the Douay-Rheims Catholic Bible versions would of necessity have to be true and the New American Standard Bible rendering false; but then Jerome's original Latin Vulgate had a rendering more in line with the New American Standard Bible (NASB) so there is cast the q uestion of why the earliest Catholic bible was quite different from the present. Really one or the other would have to in violation of Revelation 22:18, "It the prophecy of this book: if anyone gues which are written in this book;" be an intentional corruption of scripture testify to everyone who hears the words of adds to them, God shall add to him the pla (NASB)

Clearly someone has added to one of these two renderings of 1 John 5:7 since thi s is clearly NOT a difference resulting from differs in translation. Now which has been added to in violation of God's (YHWH's) commandment as recorded by his Apostle John? Well let's see what the Moody Bible Institute has to say on this in one of their publications. "The text of this verse should read, 'Because there are three th at bear record.' The remainder of the verse is spurious. Not a single manuscri pt contains the Trinitarian addition before the fourteenth century, and the vers e is never quoted in the controversies over the Trinity in the first 450 years o f the church era." [The Wycliffe Bible Commentary," edited by Charles F. Pfeiff er (OT) and Earett F. Harrison (NT), by Moody Press, Chicago, a division of Mood y Bible Institute, ISBN: 0-8024-9695-4, Library of Congress Catalogue Card #: 62 -20893, page 1477]. Quite an admission from an institute that is pro-Trinitarian; therefore, the New American Standard Bible is correct and the Authorized King James and the DouayRheims Catholic Bible are in gross error here with respect to this addition made in violation of the command of Revelation 18:22. My what a surprise. In fact this corruption, "and these three are one" was added by a monk, and is so well k nows, as previously mentioned, as a corrupt and spurious verse addition that it even has its own name, Comma Johanna (in Greek, Comma Ioanneum), can you imagine that? In fact this corruption of scripture does not appear in any manuscript in or out of the New Testament earlier than the 13 th. Century. It occurs in NO ancient Gree, manuscript, nor in the writings of any Greek Christian writers. "It is un iversally discredited by Greek scholars and editors of the Greek text of the New Testament." ["The Goodspeed Parallel New Testament," by Edgar J. Goodspeed - Ch icago 1943, page 557]. Strange, all good Bible scholars recognize this as spurious including Catholic s cholars, but, "....most Catholic writers of the present day agree the words were not contained in the original test; at the same time, until further action be t aken by the Holy See it is not open to Catholic editors to eliminate the words f rom a version made for use of the faithful." [The Westminister Version of the S acred Scriptures," Cutbert Lattey, S.J., and Joseph Keating, S.J., general edito rs, Vol. IV, pages 145 and 146, London 1931]. Now really why is this, obviously they do NOT want the 'faithful' to know they have NOT been told the truth and t hat their false Trinity doctrine does not 'hold water.' Most modern Bibles have eliminated this spurious addition done against the comma

nd found at Revelations 22:18: see the following: For there are three that testify: (New American Standard Bible: NASB) There are three that testify: (New Revised Standard Version: NRSV) And the Spirit is the witness, because the Spirit is the truth. (The Revised Sta ndard Version; RSV) There are three witnesses: (The Good News Translation) So there are three witnesses that tell us about Jesus: (New Century Version) It is the Spirit who bears witness, because the Spirit is the truth. (World Engl ish Version) For they that bear witness are three. (The Darby Translation) For there are three that testify: (Holman Standard Christian Translation) For there are three that give testimony-- the Spirit, the water, and the blood; (Weymouth Translation) For there are three that testify: (New International Version) Now really, how can anyone in all honesty believe a false doctrine whose princip le support has been text that is spurious or test that can be translated at leas t nine (9) different ways without violating the grammatical rules of Koine Greek as can John 1:1? Especially so when the common rendering is shown to be out o f context by John 1:2 and John 1:14 right after it. Obviously thinking individuals should recognize the nonsense doctrine of the thr ee-in-one god as spurious God (YHWH) dishonoring doctrine of men and NOT from Go d (YHWH). IV APPENDIX TO COMMENTARY ON 1 JOHN 5:7 (1) The Textual Problem in 1 John 5:7-8 by Daniel B. Wallace, Ph.D. "5:7 For there are three that testify, 5:8 the Spirit and the water and the bloo d, and these three are in agreement." --NET Bible Before toV pneu'ma kaiV toV u{dwr kaiV toV ai ma, the Textus Receptus reads ejn tw'/ oujranw'/, oJ pathvr, oJ lovgo", kaiV toV a{gion pneu'ma, kaiV ou toi oiJ t rei'" e{n eijsi. 5:8 kaiV trei'" eijsin oiJ marturou'nte" ejn th'/ gh'/ ("in hea ven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit, and these three are one. 5:8 And there are three that testify on earth"). This reading, the infamous Comma Johan neum, has been known in the English-speaking world through the King James transl ation. However, the evidence-both external and internal-is decidedly against its authenticity. Our discussion will briefly address the external evidence.1 This longer reading is found only in eight late manuscripts, four of which have the words in a marginal note. Most of these manuscripts (2318, 221, and [with mi nor variations] 61, 88, 429, 629, 636, and 918) originate from the 16th century; the earliest manuscript, codex 221 (10th century), includes the reading in a ma rginal note which was added sometime after the original composition. Thus, there is no sure evidence of this reading in any Greek manuscript until the 1500s; ea ch such reading was apparently composed after Erasmus' Greek NT was published in 1516. Indeed, the reading appears in no Greek witness of any kind (either manus cript, patristic, or Greek translation of some other version) until AD 1215 (in a Greek translation of the Acts of the Lateran Council, a work originally writte

n in Latin). This is all the more significant, since many a Greek Father would h ave loved such a reading, for it so succinctly affirms the doctrine of the Trini ty.2 The reading seems to have arisen in a fourth century Latin homily in which the text was allegorized to refer to members of the Trinity. From there, it made its way into copies of the Latin Vulgate, the text used by the Roman Catholic C hurch. The Trinitarian formula (known as the Comma Johanneum) made its way into the thi rd edition of Erasmus' Greek NT (1522) because of pressure from the Catholic Chu rch. After his first edition appeared (1516), there arose such a furor over the absence of the Comma that Erasmus needed to defend himself. He argued that he di d not put in the Comma because he found no Greek manuscripts that included it. O nce one was produced (codex 61, written by one Roy or Froy at Oxford in c. 1520) ,3 Erasmus apparently felt obliged to include the reading. He became aware of th is manuscript sometime between May of 1520 and September of 1521. In his annotat ions to his third edition he does not protest the rendering now in his text,4 as though it were made to order; but he does defend himself from the charge of ind olence, noting that he had taken care to find whatever manuscripts he could for the production of his Greek New Testament. In the final analysis, Erasmus probab ly altered the text because of politico-theologico-economic concerns: he did not want his reputation ruined, nor his Novum Instrumentum to go unsold. Modern advocates of the Textus Receptus and KJV generally argue for the inclusio n of the Comma Johanneum on the basis of heretical motivation by scribes who did not include it. But these same scribes elsewhere include thoroughly orthodox re adings-even in places where the TR/Byzantine manuscripts lack them. Further, the se KJV advocates argue theologically from the position of divine preservation: s ince this verse is in the TR, it must be original. But this approach is circular , presupposing as it does that the TR = the original text. Further, it puts thes e Protestant proponents in the awkward and self-contradictory position of having to affirm that the Roman Catholic humanist, Erasmus, was just as inspired as th e apostles, for on several occasions he invented readings-due either to careless ness or lack of Greek manuscripts (in particular, for the last six verses of Rev elation Erasmus had to back-translate from Latin to Greek). In reality, the issue is history, not heresy: How can one argue that the Comma J ohanneum must go back to the original text when it did not appear until the 16th century in any Greek manuscripts? Such a stance does not do justice to the gosp el: faith must be rooted in history. To argue that the Comma must be authentic i s Bultmannian in its method, for it ignores history at every level. As such, it has very little to do with biblical Christianity, for a biblical faith is one th at is rooted in history. Significantly, the German translation done by Luther was based on Erasmus' secon d edition (1519) and lacked the Comma. But the KJV translators, basing their wor k principally on Theodore Beza's 10th edition of the Greek NT (1598), a work whi ch itself was fundamentally based on Erasmus' third and later editions (and Step hanus' editions), popularized the Comma for the English-speaking world. Thus, th e Comma Johanneum has been a battleground for English-speaking Christians more t han for others. Unfortunately, for many, the Comma and other similar passages have become such e motional baggage that is dragged around whenever the Bible is read that a knee-j erk reaction and ad hominem argumentation becomes the first and only way that th ey can process this issue. Sadly, neither empirical evidence nor reason can diss uade them from their views. The irony is that their very clinging to tradition a t all costs (namely, of an outmoded translation which, though a literary monumen t in its day, is now like a Model T on the Autobahn) emulates Roman Catholicism in its regard for tradition.5 If the King James translators knew that this would be the result nearly four hundred years after the completion of their work, the y'd be writhing in their graves.

1 For a detailed discussion, see Metzger, Textual Commentary, 2nd ed., 647-49. 2 Not only the ancient orthodox writers, but also modern orthodox scholars would of course be delighted if this reading were the original one. But the fact is t hat the evidence simply does not support the Trinitarian formula here-and these orthodox scholars just happen to hold to the reasonable position that it is esse ntial to affirm what the Bible affirms where it affirms it, rather than create s uch affirmations ex nihilo. That KJV advocates have charged modern translations with heresy because they lack the Comma is a house of cards, for the same transl ators who have worked on the NIV, NASB, or NET (as well as many other translatio ns) have written several articles and books affirming the Trinity. 3 This manuscript which contains the entire New Testament is now housed in Dubli n. It has been examined so often at this one place that the book now reportedly falls open naturally to 1 John 5. 4 That Erasmus made such a protest or that he had explicitly promised to include the Comma is an overstatement of the evidence, though the converse of this can be said to be true: Erasmus refused to put this in his without Greek manuscript support. 5 Thus, TR-KJV advocates subconsciously embrace two diametrically opposed tradit ions: when it comes to the first 1500 years of church history, they hold to a Bu ltmannian kind of Christianity (viz., the basis for their belief in the superior ity of the Byzantine manuscripts-and in particular, the half dozen that stand be hind the TR-has very little empirical substance of historical worth). Once such readings became a part of tradition, however, by way of the TR, the argument shi fts to one of tradition rather than non-empirical fideism. Neither basis, of cou rse, resembles Protestantism Commentary on Matthew 3:13-17 all 'Sola Scriptura,' covering Matthew 3:16-17 and more. Matthew 3:13-17 Then cometh Jesus from Galilee to the Jordan unto John, to be baptized of him. 14 But John would have hindered him, saying, I have need to be baptized of thee, and comest thou to me? 15 But Jesus answering said unto him, S uffer [it] now: for thus it becometh us to fulfil all righteousness. Then he suf fereth him. 16 And Jesus when he was baptized, went up straightway from the wate r: and lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descen ding as a dove, and coming upon him; 17 and lo, a voice out of the heavens, sayi ng, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. [American Standard Vers ion; ASV] Clearly this scripture shows that Jesus' (Yeshua's) Father, Almighty God (YHWH) approved of his Son, and sent his spirit, the Spirit of God. This was also tes tified to at Acts 10:38, "How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God was with him." (Authorized King James Bible; AV); And at L uke 9:34-35, "And there came a voice out of the cloud, and overshadowed them: an d they feared as they entered into the cloud. 35 And there came a voice out of the cloud, saying, This is my beloved Son: hear him." (AV); And at Matthew 17:5 , "While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a vo ice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well plea sed; hear ye him." (AV). In fact, John the Baptist said as recorded at John 1 :32, "And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him. 33 And I knew him not: but he that sent me to b aptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit de scending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the holy Gho st." (AV). Clearly these scriptures show two separate individuals or beings, a superior one, Almighty God (YHWH), and a subordinate one, his Son, Jesus (Yeshu a). Now what is this Spirit or Holy Spirit that John the Baptist mentioned? The Ho

ly Spirit is only God's (YHWH's) active force and not even a spirit being or per son. This is clearly shown at Pentecost where the Holy Spirit was poured out ont o all there, Acts 2:1-4, "And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they wer e all with one accord in one place. 2 And suddenly there came a sound from heave n as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitti ng. 3 And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat up on each of them. 4 And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to sp eak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance." (AV). This entire sc ripture bespeaks of a force and not a being as you do not get filled with a bein g! And this fact is reaffirmed at Acts 4:31, ""And when they had prayed, the pla ce was shaken where they were assembled together; and they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and they spoke the word of God with boldness." (AV); And 2 Corin thians 1:21-22, "Now he which stablisheth us with you in Christ, and hath anoint ed us, is God; 22 Who hath also sealed us, and given the earnest of the Spirit i n our hearts." (AV), surely a being would not be in our hearts as that is ludicr ous, thus this scripture talks of God's (YHWH's) active force; This is clearly s hown at Luke 11:13, "If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto yo ur children: how much more give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him?" (AV). On ce more, why? Why? Do many say they are coequal and coeternal when clearly they are not and the Holy Ghost is just God's (YHWH's) active force? Only to try to give some resemblance of reality to a myth as we shall later see. An interesti ng note on the Spirit is that the neuter Greek word for spirit (pneu'ma) is used , the neuter pronoun "it" is properly employed. This fact is conveniently over looked or hidden by most Trinitarian translators as admitted in the "New Ameri can Bible Catholic Bible," regarding John 14:17: "The Greek word for 'Spirit' i s neuter, and while we use personal pronouns in English ('he,' 'his,' 'him'), mo st Greek MSS [manuscripts] employ 'it.'" So when the Bible uses masculine pers onal pronouns in connection with para'kletos at John 16:7, 8, it is conforming to rules of grammar, not expressing a doctrine. Jesus' (Yeshua's) coming and his anointing by his Father (YHWH) was foretold in advance at Isaiah 42:1 where God (YHWH) called his Son his servant, "Behold my s ervant, whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spi rit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles." (AV); And Matthew 12:18 foretells the fulfillment, "Behold my servant, whom I have chosen; my belo ved, in whom my soul is well pleased: I will put my spirit upon him, and he shal l shew judgment to the Gentiles." (AV). Likewise, this is testified to at Isai ah 11:2, "And the spirit of the Lord shall rest upon him, the spirit of wisdom a nd understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and o f the fear of the Lord;" (AV). In fact, Jesus (Yeshua) prayed to his Father (Y HWH) just before his execution, saying at John 12:28, "Father, glorify thy name, Then came there a voice from heaven, saying, I have both glorified it, and wil l glorify it again." (AV). Yet there are those misguided ones that accept the false God (YHWH) dishonoring doctrine of the Trinity that claim the Father (YHWH) and the Son, Jesus (Yeshua) are coequal which clearly when one prays to the other, this claim can NOT be tr ue. In fact, the doctrine of The Trinity defies the universally accepted and hi storically always held meaning of the words for father and son. Not only does i t defy the meaning of these words, it destroys their meaning! This fact is impor tant to realize for God gave us language. It was not invented by man as the evol utionist tries to say. Thus, we are not destroying man made terms, but God-given terms! One well known document, The Westminister Confession, even goes so far as to state, "In the unity of the Godhead there be three persons, of one substa nce, power, and eternity." But we have seen this is impossible if the Bible is t rue. At John 14:28, "Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come ag ain unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Fa ther: for my Father is greater than I." (AV); thus, clearly no coequality as req uired by the Godhead theory of this document as clearly earlier shown. The Spi rit is not even a being, but God's (YHWH's) active force.

Commentary on 2 Corinthians 13:13-14 all 'Sola Scriptura,' covering 2 Corinthian s 13:14 and more: 2 Corinthians 13:13-14 All the saints salute you. 14 The grace of the Lord Je sus Christ, and the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Spirit, be with y ou all. (American Standard Version; ASV) Here the Apostle Paul expresses the hope that the grace of the Lord, Jesus (Yesh ua) Christ, and of love of his Father, God (YHWH), and the spirit or power of Go d (YHWH) shall be on all true Christians. And the Apostle John follows through with this thought at John 14:26, "But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring a ll things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you." (Authorized Kin g James Bible; AV). Of this Holy Spirit or Ghost, Jesus (Yeshua) spoke of the holy spirit as a "helper," and he said it would teach, guide, and speak as recor ded at John 14:16-17, "And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; 17 Even the Spirit of truth; w hom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you." (AV). And this s ame thought is carried at John 16:13, ""Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to co me. 14 He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unt o you." (AV). The Greek word he used for helper (para'kletos) is in the masculi ne gender. Thus, when Jesus referred to what the helper would do, he used masc uline personal pronouns as shown at John 16:7- 8, "Nevertheless I tell you the t ruth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforte r will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you. 8 And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judg ment." (AV). On the other hand, when the neuter Greek word for spirit (pneu'ma ) is used, the neuter pronoun "it" is properly employed. This fact is convenie ntly over looked or hidden by most Trinitarian translators as admitted in the " New American Bible Catholic Bible," regarding John 14:17: "The Greek word for ' Spirit' is neuter, and while we use personal pronouns in English ('he,' 'his,' ' him'), most Greek MSS [manuscripts] employ 'it.'" So when the Bible uses mascu line personal pronouns in connection with para'kletos at John 16:7, 8, it is confo rming to rules of grammar, not expressing a doctrine. This scripture, 2 Corinthians 13:13-14 previously quoted, brings up the need for unity among all true Christians as do the scriptures immediately prior to it, 2 Corinthians 13:11-12, "Finally, brethren, farewell. Be perfected; be comforted; be of the same mind; live in peace: and the God of love and peace shall be with you. 12 Salute one another with a holy kiss." (ASV), and this need is further t estified to at Ephesians 4:13, "Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ:" (AV). We need to per Ephesians 4:21-22, "I f indeed you have heard Him and have been taught in Him, just as truth is in Jes us, 22 that in reference to your former manner of life, you lay aside the old s elf, which is being corrupted in accordance with the lusts of deceit," (New Amer ican Standard Bible, Ref. Ed., by Moody Press; NASB-MP), this scripture clearly showing the need to make over our personality unto the new personality acceptabl e to Jesus (Yeshua) Christ as testified to at Ephesians 4:23, "And be renewed tn the spirit of your mind; 24 And that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness." (NASB-MP). This is necessary as t here is only one Almighty God (YHWH) as testified to at Ephesians 4:6, "One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all." (AV). F or a certainty each of us, if we accept, is, Ephesians 4:7, "But unto every one of us is given grace according to the measure of the gift of Christ." (AV).

Clearly since there is but one Almighty God (YHWH) There can be no Trinity which is a myth requiring a 'Godhead' of three equal beings, coeternal and coequal as affirmed in the Westminister Confession, "In the unity of the Godhead there be three persons, of one substance, power, and eternity." But as we have seen, no such relationship exist between Almighty God (YHWH), the superior one; his son, the Son of God, Jesus (Yeshua) of which the Bible testifies at 1 Corinthians 11 :3, "But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the he ad of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God." )AV) clearly showing God (YHWH) is the head of Jesus (Yeshua) Christ; thus proving they are not coe qual. Likewise Revelations 3:14 clearly shows they are not coeternal, "And unt o the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;" which show s him as the first of God's (YHWH's) creation. In fact, when Jesus (Yeshua) was ascending to be with his Father in heaven, he prayed, as recorded in John 17:5, "And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was." (AV). Showing he was returning to where h e had been before with his Father (YHWH), see John 6:62, "What then if you shoul d behold the Son of Man ascending where He was before?" (NASB-MP). Once returne d to heaven, God's (YHWH's) Son, Jesus (Yeshua) is, 1 Peter 3:22, "Who is gone into heaven, and is on the right hand of God; angels and authorities and powers being made subject unto him" (AV). <<Sub Section 'P' Commentaries on the Scriptures>> Commentary on John 1:14 all 'Sola Scriptura.' John 1:14 And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us (and we beheld his glo ry, glory as of the only begotten from the Father), full of grace and truth. (A merican Standard Version; ASV) This scripture emphasis that Jesus (Yeshua) was sent to the earth to dwell among us as testified to at 1 John 4:9, "In this was manifested the love of God towar d us, because that God sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him." (AV); And 1 John 4:14, "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Saviour of the world." (AV), clearly Jesus' (Y eshua's) Father (YHWH) sent him showing he was superior and not coequal with His Son; And Romans 6:23, "For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is e ternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." (AV). In fact, the scriptures clea rly show that all true Christians must confess Jesus (Yeshua) has come in the fl esh as testified to at 1 John 4:2, "Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spir it that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God." (AV); wher eas, 2 John 7 states shows many deceiver would come, "For many deceivers are en tered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. T his is a deceiver and an antichrist." (AV). Clearly the only way to God (YHWH) is through his Son, Jesus (Yeshua) whom he ha s appointed as, 1 Timothy 2:5, "For there is one God, and one mediator between G od and men, the man Christ Jesus;" (AV); and this is made even clearer by Jesus (Yeshua) at John 14:6, "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the l ife: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." (AV). God (YHWH) has given his Son Jesus (Yeshua) an assignment and given him power over everything except him self to carry it out as testified to at 1 Corinthians 15:22-28, "For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. 23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming. 2 4 Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power. 25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet. 26 The last ene my that shall be destroyed is death. 27 For he hath put all things under his fee t. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is exc epted, which did put all things under him. 28 And when all things shall be subdu

ed unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all th ings under him, that God may be all in all." (AV), testifies that God (YHWH) had given his Son, Jesus (Yeshua) over all except himself when the scripture says " it is manifest that he is excepted." Jesus (Yeshua) actually prayed to his Father (YHWH) just before being put to dea th as a human to give him back the glory he previously had with his Father (YHWH ) in heaven as recorded at John 17:5- "And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was. 6 I h ave manifested thy name unto the men which thou gavest me out of the world: thin e they were, and thou gavest them me; and they have kept my word. 7 Now they ha ve known that all things whatsoever thou hast given me are of thee. 8 For I hav e given unto them the words which thou gavest me; and they have received them, a nd have known surely that I came out from thee, and they have believed that thou didst send me." (AV). Unmistakably Jesus (Yeshua) acknowledges in his prayer that his Father, Almighty God (YHWH) had given him everything and was his super ior when he stated, "I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me; and they have received them, and have known surely that I came out from thee, and th ey have believed that thou didst send me." Therefore, we see that the Trinity is but a myth as the reality is that Jesus (Yeshua) is NOT coequal with his Fat her (YHWH), but that his Father, Almighty God (YHWH) is the Supreme one. Commentary on John 1:18 all 'Sola Scriptura.' John 1:18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, who is in th e bosom of the Father, he hath declared him. (American Standard Version, ASV) Now this scripture seem straight forward and it is, but some translations did a poor job of translating it. Let's look at how the New International Version (NI V) translates this, "No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only, who is at the Father's side, has made him known.' Would appear to show Jesus (Yeshua) a s the One and Only, but this is just an error in translation in the NIV as shown by both the Authorized King James (AV) which renders it, ""No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hat h declared him." And the Douay-Rheims Catholic Bible renders it, "No one has at any time seen God. The only-begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, he has revealed him." Now some may ask, how do you determine for sure which way o f translating is correct. You do this quite simply by investigation the scriptu re from the Old Testament actually being quoted here by the Apostle John for the first part of this scripture which is Exodus 33:20, "And he said, Thou canst no t see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live." (Authorized King James Bible; AV); And compare with similar scriptures in the New Testament such as Joh n 6:46, "Not that any man hath seen the Father, save he which is of God, he hath seen the Father." (AV). Then you check the Old Testament scripture from which the Apostle John took the second part, Proverbs 8:30, where Jesus (Yeshua) while in heaven was speaking, "Then I was by him, as one brought up with him; and I w as daily his delight, rejoicing always before him," (AV). And cross reference t his in the New Testament to John 13:23, "Now there was leaning on Jesus' bosom o ne of his disciples, whom Jesus loved." (AV). Now of course, people have seen Jesus (Yeshua). The Apostle John, who wrote Joh n 1:18, saw Jesus. He even said four verses earlier that Jesus (God according to Trinitarians) had become flesh, John 1:14, "And the Word was made f lesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only beg otten of the Father,) full of grace and truth." Yet no one has seen God. If John were trying to say in John 1:1 that Jesus (Yeshua) was God (YHWH) and then a fe w verses later say no one has seen God (YHWH), would he not need to put some typ e of qualifying statement explaining how this can be? Or are we to assume his re aders had a firm grasp of the Duality or Trinity and needed no explanation of th is paradox? While some Bibles say "only-begotten son" the oldest manuscripts sa

y "only-begotten god". Most Bible do not want to translate it literally that way since this would imply Jesus (Yeshua) was made a god by God (YHWH). So the New International Version (NIV) reads as I quoted above "God the One and Only". Howe ver, the footnote to the NIV reads "or the Only-Begotten". It is proper that the NIV placed that footnote in its Bible translation because we are inclined to as k, "the One and Only what?" In what way is the Son the 'One and Only God' that t he Father (YHWH)is not? John said that Jesus (Yeshua) was with God (YHWH) and y et was a god and Jesus (Yeshua) was the only begotten son of God (YHWH), the con text supports a literal translation of John 1:18. Jesus (Yeshua) was the "only-b egotten god". That is, God Almighty created Jesus and put him in the position of a god or mighty spirit person whom He used to create the rest of the universe. While it is true that angels and men can be referred to as "gods", they were not begotten directly by Almighty God. Interestingly the NIV says, John 6:27, "Do not work for food that spoils, but fo r food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you. On him God the Father has placed his seal of approval." (NIV). It is obvious that ther e are two individuals here: the Son of Man (Yeshua) and God the Father (YHWH). Two separate and distinct persons. Also notice that the Father (YHWH) places hi s "seal of approval" on the Son. But nowhere in the Bible is there a Scripture where the Son, Jesus (Yeshua) places approval on the Father (YHWH). This shows o r indicates that the Father is in the superior position and the Son is in the in ferior position, i.e., they are NOT COEQUAL. The NIV reaffirms this fact, they are NOT COEQUAL at 1 Peter 1:1-2, "Peter, an a postle of Jesus Christ, To God's elect, strangers in the world, scattered throug hout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia and Bithynia, 2 who have been chosen acco rding to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through the sanctifying work of th e Spirit, for obedience to Jesus Christ and sprinkling by his blood: Grace and p eace be yours in abundance." (NIV). Once more we see two separate and distinct beings here: God the Father (YHWH) and Jesus (Yeshua) Christ. Now some will say that Jesus (Yeshua) and His Father (YHWH) are one-and-the-same based on the usual out of context rendering of John 1:1 "In the beginning was t he Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Well, try to keep the mental context of who Jesus was to the people who lived and studied about him w hen the Bible text was written. Apart from this verse, there is no indicator th at anyone thought that Jesus (Yeshua)was God (YHWH). This is made clear by John 1:2, which shows, "The same was in the beginning with God." (AV); And John 1:10 , "He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him no t." (AV); Last consider John 1:14, previously quoted, and it is quite clear that they are NOT the same individual. But two distinct individuals. Note, some Bi bles correctly render this as either as "the Word was a god," or "the Word was D ivine." Both of these are in harmony with the remaining scriptures in John the f irst chapter. The fact is that no Apostle nor any other writer of the Bible ever came out and stated that "there is One God: Father, Son, and Holy Ghost". No example of the thousands of occurrences of YHWH and God in the original manuscripts can be show n to mean 'God in three Persons' as some falsely claim. In fact neither the wor d Duality nor Trinity appear nowhere in the scriptures. So be ye not mislead in to believing the doctrines of men, but remember John 8:32, "And ye shall know th e truth, and the truth shall make you free." (AV). <<Sub Section 'Q' Commentaries on the Scriptures>> Commentary on John 15:26 all 'Sola Scriptura." John 15:26 But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the F

ather, [even] the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall be ar witness of me: (American Standard Version; ASV) This scripture clearly shows that the Spirit comes from the Father (YHWH), but w e need to ask just what is this spirit, and to look at the scriptures immediatel y proceeding John 15:26. Let's now look at these scriptures. John 15:18-25, "I f the world hateth you, ye know that it hath hated me before [it hated] you. 19 If ye were of the world, the world would love its own: but because ye are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. 20 Remember the word that I said unto you, A servant is not greater than his lord. If they persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they kept my word, they will keep yours also. 21 But all these things will they do unto you for my name 's sake, because they know not him that sent me. 22 If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin: but now they have no excuse for their sin. 23 He that hateth me hateth my Father also. 24 If I had not done among them the wor ks which none other did, they had not had sin: but now have they both seen and h ated both me and my Father. 25 But [this cometh to pass], that the word may be f ulfilled that is written in their law, They hated me without a cause." (ASV). Here Jesus (Yeshua) clearly testified that he had been sent, i.e., by a superior one, "they know not him that sent me," and this is reinforced when he said, "He that hateth me hateth my Father also." So Jesus (Yeshua) had been sent by his Father (YHWH) to do his Father's (YHWH's) will, and clearly testified at John 5: 19, "Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise." (AV); therefore we see tha t Jesus (Yeshua) was doing the will of his Father (YHWH). Now let's consider the Holy Spirit, the Comforter, that Jesus (Yeshua) would sen d to true Christians from his Father (YHWH). What exactly is it? This Spirit or Comforter is God's (YHWH's) active force that goes forth or emanates from Al mighty God (YHWH). One of its functions is to act as a Comforter to mankind, se e John 14:26, "But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your rem embrance, whatsoever I have said unto you." (AV); And this is reaffirmed at John 14:16-17, "And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; 17 Even the Spirit of truth; whom the wor ld cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know hi m; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you." (AV). In summary, It is the Creator's (YHWH's) force for getting things accomplished, 1 Corinthians 2:10, " And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spi rit, which is the word of God:" (Ephesians 6:17; AV), " But God hath revealed th em unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep thi ngs of God." (AV). This is made even clearer as the Bible shows that God (YHWH) pours out his active force onto his followers, Joel 2:28-29, "And it shall come to pass afterward, that I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions: 29 And also upon the servants and upon the handmaids in those days will I pour out my spirit." (AV), and also caused inspired individual s to, 2 Peter 1:21, " For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost." (AV). Clearly then the Trinity is just a myth as defined as follows in the Westminister Confes sion, "In the unity of the Godhead there be three persons, of one substance, pow er, and eternity;" since Jesus (Yeshua) is NOT COEQUAL with his Father, Almighty God (YHWH), NOR is the Holy Spirit, since this is not an individual, but clearl y the power and/or force of God (YHWH). Note, in ancient Koine Greek, the Spiri t is always grammatically of the neutral gender, the neuter Greek word for spiri t (pneu'ma) is used, the neuter pronoun "it" is properly employed. This fact i s conveniently over looked or hidden by most Trinitarian translators as admitted in the "New American Bible Catholic Bible," regarding John 14:17: "The Greek

word for 'Spirit' is neuter, and while we use personal pronouns in English ('he, ' 'his,' 'him'), most Greek MSS [manuscripts] employ 'it.'" So when the Bible uses masculine personal pronouns in connection with para'kletos at John 16:7, 8, i t is conforming to rules of grammar, not expressing a doctrine. It is now clea r beyond question that the Trinity is just false doctrine warned against at Titu s 2:1, ""But speak thou the things which become sound doctrine:" (AV); this mean s we must reject myths being put forth as doctrine. Commentary on Galatians 4:6 all 'Sola Scriptura." Galatians 4:6 And because ye are sons, God sent forth the Spirit of his Son in to our hearts, crying, Abba, Father. (American Standard Version; ASV) Let's first look at the scriptures immediately proceeding this to gain an unders tanding of the contest of this scripture, Galatians 4:1-5, "But I say that so lo ng as the heir is a child, he differeth nothing from a bondservant though he is lord of all; 2 but is under guardians and stewards until the day appointed of th e father. 3 So we also, when we were children, were held in bondage under the ru diments of the world: 4 but when the fulness of the time came, God sent forth hi s Son, born of a woman, born under the law, 5 that he might redeem them that wer e under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons." (ASV). Here is s hown God's (YHWH's) purpose for sending his only begotten Son, Jesus (Yeshua) to the earth and this is clarified at Romans 5:12, "Through one man sin entered in to the world and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men because the y had all sinned." (The Kingdom Interlinear Lexicon). So he was sent by his Fa ther (YHWH) to redeem mankind of inherited sin, 1 John 4:14, "And we have seen a nd do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Saviour of the world." (Aut horized King James Bible, AV); Thus clearly showing his Father (YHWH), as the su perior one, sent his Son, Jesus (Yeshua) to the world clearly showing a superior subordinate relationship and not one of coequality. Now let's look at the scriptures immediately after this to gain an even better u nderstanding of the contest of Galatians 4:6, see Galatians 4:7-11, "So that tho u art no longer a bondservant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir through God . Howbeit at that time, not knowing God, ye were in bondage to them that by natu re are no gods: 9 but now that ye have come to know God, or rather to be known b y God, how turn ye back again to the weak and beggarly rudiments, whereunto ye d esire to be in bondage over again? 10 Ye observe days, and months, and seasons, and years. 11 I am afraid of you, lest by any means I have bestowed labor upon y ou in vain." (ASV). So God (YHWH) sent his Spirit, Romans 8:16, "The Spirit its elf beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God:" (AV); And this Spirit of God (YHWH), 1 John 3:24, "And he that keepeth his commandments d welleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us." (AV); And the drelling of his active force or s pirit in us is affirmed at 1 John 4:13, "Hereby know we that we dwell in him, an d he in us, because he hath given us of his Spirit." (AV). And 1 John 3:230-24 shows, "And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his S on Jesus Christ, and love one another as he gave us commandment. 24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know t hat he abideth in us, by the spirit which he hath given." (AV). Now exactly what is the Spirit of God (YHWH) which is also called the Comforter? It is God's (YHWH's)active force or power that he uses to accomplish his will as shown by John 14:26, "But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Fa ther will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things t o your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you." (AV); And this is reaffirm ed at John 14:16-17, "And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; 17 Even the Spirit of truth; wh om the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you." (AV). And Romans 5

:5 shows God (YHWH) gives true Christians a part of his power or holy spirit, "A nd hope maketh not ashamed; because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given unto us." (Authorized King James Bible;" (AV); and this is reaffirmed at Mark 14:33-36, "And saith unto them, My soul is excee ding sorrowful unto death: tarry ye here, and watch. 35 And he went forward a l ittle, and fell on the ground and prayed that, if it were possible, the hour mig ht pass from him. 36 And he said, Abba, Father, all things are possible unto th ee; take away this cup from me: nevertheless not what I will, but what thou wilt ." (AV). Here Jesus was praying to his Father, Almighty God (YHWH) and acknowle dging him as the superior one contrary to the untruths put forth by man such as in the Westminister Confession which clearly contradicts the Word of God by stat ing of one substance and power; whereas, God (YHWH) has been shown by the script ures to be the superior one that even his Son, Jesus (Yeshua) prays to. It is time for all to disgard myths such as the Trinity put forth as supposed truth by misguided documents such as the Westminster Confession which are the product of hermeneutic methodology used by those who seek to hide the truth of the scriptu res instead of letting the scriptures speak for themselves as they do in true 'S ola Scripture' comments on the Word of God; This per 2 Peter 1:20, "This, then, you must understand first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture is made by priva te interpretation." (The Confraternity Edition of The New Testament by John C. W inston Co. -Catholic). <CONCLUSION> Unfortunately, the clever deceiver and twister of the scripture who was one of t he best masters with respect using hermeneutic methodology to deceive unwary one s into false doctrine and mythology, Cornelius Burges, Assessor to the Westminst er Assembly, was only one of many; but more polished in the art of deception tha n most. As the apostles died, various writers undertook the task of defending Christiani ty against the persecutions evoked by the Church's expansion. (*2)

The most famous of these Apologists was Justin Martyr (c.107-166 AD). He was bor n a pagan, became a pagan philosopher, then a Christian. He believed that Christ ianity and Greek Philosophy were related. According to McGiffert, "Justin insist ed that Christ came from God; he did not identify him with God. . . [He] conceiv [ed] of God as a transcendent being, who could not possibly come into contact wi th the world of men and things." (*2). An exhaustive review of Scripture and history reveals the simple fact that the T rinity teaching was unknown to the early New Testament Christians. That the doc trine of the Trinity is a "borrowed doctrine" and foreign to the Scriptures is s upported by many authorities. Under the article Trinity we read, "The term 'Tri nity' is not a biblical term...In point of fact, the doctrine of the Trinity is a purely revealed doctrine...As the doctrine of the Trinity is indiscoverable by reason, so it is incapable of proof from reason" (*1). The moral of this discourse is accept the Word of God, reject the clever twistin g of the Word of God by deceitful men in keeping with Titus 2:1, ", "But speak t hou the things which become sound doctrine:" (AV); this means we must reject myt hs being put forth as doctrine as does the Westminister Confession and similar d eceptive documents by others. V REFERENCES: *1 the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, volume 4, page 3012-3014, "The

term 'Trinity' is not a Biblical term and we are not using Biblical language wh en we define what is expressed by it as the doctrine that there is one only and true God, but in the unity of the Godhead there are three coeternal and coequal Persons, the same in substance but distinct in subsistence. A doctrine so define d can be spoken of as a Biblical doctrine only on the principle that the sense o f Scripture is Scripture. And the definition of a Biblical doctrine in such un-B iblical language can be justified only on the principle that it is better to pre serve the truth of Scripture than the words of Scripture. "...the doctrine of the Trinity is given to us in Scripture, not in formulate d doctrine, but in fragmentary allusions. "The doctrine of the Trinity is purely a revealed doctrine. That is to say, i t embodies a truth which has never been discovered, and is indiscoverable, by na tural reason. "Triads of divinities, no doubt, occur in nearly all polytheistic religions, formed under very various influences. Sometimes, as in the Egyptian triad of Osi ris, Isis and Horus, it is the analogy of the human family with its father, moth er and son which lies at their basis. Sometimes they are the effect of mere sync retism, three deities worshipped in different localities being brought together in the common worship of all. "Sometimes they are the result apparently of nothing more than odd human tend ency to think in threes, which has given the number three wide-spread standing a s a sacred number. "It should be needless to say that none of these triads has the slightest res emblance to the Christian doctrine of the Trinity. "As the doctrine of the Trinity is indiscoverable by reason, so it is incapab le of proof from reason. There are no analogies to it in Nature, not even in the spiritual nature of man, who is made in the image of God. In His Trinitarian mo de of being, God is unique; and, as there is nothing in the universe like Him in this respect, so there is nothing which can help us to comprehend Him. Many att empts have, nevertheless, been made to construct a rational proof of the Trinity of the Godhead. "Certainly we cannot speak broadly of the revelation of the doctrine of the T rinity in the Old Testament. It is a plain matter of fact that none who have dep ended on the revelation embodied in the Old Testament alone have ever attained t o the doctrine of the Trinity. "It would seem clear that we must recognize in the Old Testament doctrine of the relation of God to His revelation by the creative Word and the Spirit, at le ast the germ of the distinctions in the Godhead afterward fully made known in th e Christian revelation." *2 - Pelikan, Jaroslav. "The Emergence of the Catholic Tradition" (100-600). Chi cago: U of Chicago P. 1971. Vol. 1 of "The Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine." 5 vols. APPENDIX: (1) Jamieson, Fausett and Brown, volume 6, page 643, regarding I John 5:7 "The only Greek manuscripts, in any form which support the words 'in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are th ree that bear witness in earth...' are the Montfortianus of Dublin, copied evide ntly from the modern Latin Vulgate; the Ravianus copied from the Complutensian P olyglot; a manuscript at Naples, with the words added in the margin by a recent hand; Ottobonianus, 298, of the 15th century, the Greek of which is a mere trans lation of the accompanying Latin. All old versions omit the words." (2) Sacred Origins of Profound Things, by Charles Panati, pages 302-306 "Among the three great monotheistic religions, only Christianity embraces the Trinitarian Creed: the coexistence of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit in a single Godhead, distinctly different, yet one and the same." "One might ask - as Jews and Muslims repeatedly have - isn't it cheating for a religion to be monotheistic if it recognizes three distinctly different Gods? Three Gods; three different names; three different functions: the Creator, the R

edeemer, the Sanctifier. Should, Muslims suggested, this not be called 'tritheis m'? "Significantly, the Christian books of the Bible - the Gospels, Acts, Epistle s (or letters), Revelation, and the Apocrypha ('things that are hidden') - make no explicit reference to a three-fold Godhead. "Nor did Jesus, a Jew, perhaps with rabbinic training, violate the Judaic mot to - 'Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord' - in his teachings. "God the Father does mention God the Son in the New Testament, and the Son in turn mentions the Father and the Holy Spirit. The outline of a trinity is there , but it is never clearly delineated "Early in the fourth century, the Trinitarian controversy heated to the high point of heresy, pitting two theologians, Athanasius and Arius, against each oth er and drawing concern from the Roman emperor Constantine himself who had warmed up to Christianity and would eventually convert. "Today, Arius' name is a byword for heresy: the Arian Heresy. "Back in 320, Arius, who knew Scripture inside and out - and was a skilled pr opagandist and musician - insisted that Christ, the Word, Logos could only be a creature like ourselves, created by God. When he put his ideas to music and sang songs of Christ's second-rank status to God, thousands of ordinary Christians, once content in their monotheism, became aware of the passionate debate raging a mong bishops. "Christian bishops gathered at Nicaea on May 20, 325, convening the Council o f Nicaea, which, after much acrimonious contention, decided upon the crucial for mula for the Trinitarian doctrine, setting it forth in a credo, the Nicaean Cree d. The Son, it declared, is 'of the same essence as the Father.' The creed said troublingly little about the Holy Spirit. "In fact, the entire lengthy creed, as first written, wrestles with logic and common sense to equate Father and Son, giving nod to the Holy Spirit only in th e last passing line: 'And we believe in the Holy Ghost.' "The controversy raged on for some years. Later the Nicaean Creed was revised under the leadership of Basil, bishop of Caesarea. It was altered to end 'We be lieve in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Fat her'. "Thus, the concept of the Trinity did not take its present form until some 40 0 years after Christ's death." (3) Peakes Commentary on the Bible, page 1038 "The famous interpolation after 'three witnesses' is not printed even in the RSV , and rightly. It cites the heavenly testimony of the Father, the Logos and the Holy Spirit, but it is never used in the early Trinitarian controversies. No res pectable Greek manuscript contains it. Appearing first in a late 4th century Lat in text, it entered the Vulgate and finally the New Testament of Erasmus." (4) The Oxford Companion to the Bible, edited by Bruce M Metzger and Michael D C oogan, page 782 "Trinity: Because the Trinity is such an important part of later Christian do ctrine, it is striking that the term does not appear in the New Testament. Likew ise, the developed concept of three coequal partners in the Godhead found in lat er creedal formulations cannot be clearly detected within the confines of the ca non. "Later believers systematized the diverse references to God, Jesus and the Sp irit found in the New Testament in order to fight against heretical tendencies o f how the three are related. Elaboration on the concept of a Trinity also serves to defend the church against charges of di- or tritheism. Since the Christians have come to worship Jesus as god (Pliny, Epistles 96.7), how can they claim to be continuing the monotheistic tradition of the God of Israel? Various answers a re suggested, debated, and rejected as heretical, but the idea of a Trinity - on e God subsisting in three persons and one substance - ultimately prevails. "While the New Testament writers say a great deal about God, Jesus, and the S pirit of each, no New Testament writer expounds on the relationship among the th ree in the detail that later Christian writers do. "The earliest New Testament evidence for a tripartite formula comes in 2 Cori

nthians 13:14, where Paul wishes that 'the grace of the Lord Jesus, the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Spirit' be with the people of Corinth. It is possible that this three-part formula derives from later liturgical usage and wa s added to the text of 2 Corinthians as it was copied. In support of the authent icity of the passage, however, it must be said that the phrasing is much closer to Paul's understandings of God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit than to a more fully developed concept of the Trinity. Jesus, referred to not as Son, but as Lord an d Christ, is mentioned first and is connected with the central Pauline theme of grace. God is referred to as a source of love, not as father, and the Spirit pro motes sharing within the community. The word 'holy' does not appear before 'spir it' in the earliest manuscript evidence for this passage." (5) The Lion Encyclopedia of the Bible, page 158 "Trinity - this word is not used in the Bible. It is the name given to the st atements about God in the creeds drawn up in the early centuries of the church t o explain what is meant by saying that God is Father, Son and Holy Spirit. This is the teaching of Jesus and the New Testament as a whole. From earliest times i t was stated at every Christian baptism. "The Jewish teaching was that there is only one God. No one and nothing must compromise that belief. Yet the New Testament writers clearly show God as the Fa ther who created and sustained everything in his love and power, as the Son who came into this world, and as the Spirit who worked in their own lives. "After the end of the New Testament period the church found it necessary to w ork out carefully worded statements about three persons in one God, in order to uphold the truth of the New Testament against false beliefs." (6) Francis David's Tower, Strength through Peace, by Todd F. Eklof (06-16-02) Yet his extraordinary life becomes even more meaningful if we find in it relevan ce for the circumstances of our own day. As we shall see, Francis David, the 16t h Century son of a Saxon shoemaker, helped lay the foundation for a new sort of tower that may at last provide humanity with an enduring refuge. The problem with most towers, that is, with the ideological constructs we adopt to make us feel safe, is that they are maintained by force. For example, when th e Roman Emperor Constantine became a Christian, he wanted to rule a unified Chri stian empire. But first he would have to find a way to end the dispute over the divinity of Jesus-was he a man or God? So he ordered his Christian bishops to me et at Nicaea in 325 A.D. to settle the matter once and for all. Their solution w as to create a creed making it illegal for anyone to believe Jesus was not the s ame as God by inventing the notion of a Trinity. This intellectual tower remaine d in full force for well over a thousand years, until the Reformation. (7) The Origin of the Trinity: From Paganism to Constantine by Cher-El L. Hagens ick]The search for the origins of the Trinity begins with the earliest writings of man. Records of early Mesopotamian and Mediterranean civilizations show polyt heistic religions, though many scholars assert that earliest man believed in one god. The 19th century scholar and Protestant minister, Alexander Hislop, devote s several chapters of his book The Two Babylons to showing how this original bel ief in one god was replaced by the triads of paganism which were eventually abso rbed into Catholic Church dogmas. A more recent Egyptologist, Erick Hornung, ref utes the original monotheism of Egypt: '[Monotheism is] a phenomenon restricted to the wisdom texts,' which were written between 2600 and 2530 BC (50-51); but t here is no question that ancient man believed in 'one infinite and Almighty Crea tor, supreme over all' (Hislop 14); and in a multitude of gods at a later point. Nor is there any doubt that the most common grouping of gods was a triad.1 (8) Durant, Will. , Caesar and Christ. New York: Simon. 1944. Vol. 3 of The Stor y of Civilization. 11 vols. 1935-75.- note, I believe this author was Catholic With this background, let's look at the growth and evolution of the Trinity. As previous stated, the Bible does not mention the trinity. Harnack affirms that t he early church view of Jesus was as Messiah. After his resurrection he was "rai sed to the right hand of God" - but not considered as God. (78) Lonergan concurs that the educated Christians of the early centuries believed in one, supreme Go d. (119). As for the Holy Spirit, McGiffert tells us that "They [early Christian

s] thought of [the Holy Spirit] not as an individual being or person but simply as the divine power working in the world and particularly in the Church." (111) Durant summarizes Apostolic Christianity thus: "In Christ and Peter Christianity was Jewish; in Paul it became half Greek; in Catholicism it became half Roman." [ (9) Pelikan, Jaroslav. The Emergence of the Catholic Tradition (100-600). Chicag o: U of Chicago P. 1971. Vol. 1 of The Christian Tradition: A History of the Dev elopment of Doctrine. 5 vols. As the apostles died, various writers undertook the task of defending Christianity against the persecutions evoked by the Church 's expansion. The writers of these "Apologies" are known to us now as "Apologist s". Pelikan states that "it was at least partly in response to pagan criticism o f the stories in the Bible that the Christian apologists... took over and adapte d the methods and even vocabulary of pagan allegorism." (10) Dictionary Of The Bible 1995 John L. Mckenzie "The trinity of persons within the unity of nature is defined in terms of 'perso n' and 'nature' which are Greek philosophical terms; actually the terms do not a ppear in the Bible. The trinitarian definitions arose as the result of long cont roversies in which these terms and others such as 'essence' and 'substance' were erroneously applied to God by some theologians." (11) The Encyclopedia Americana 1956 "Christianity derived from Judaism and Judaism was strictly Unitarian (believing in one God). The road which led from Jerusalem to Nicea was scarcely a straight one. Fourth century trinitarianism did not reflect accurately early Christian t eaching regarding the nature of God; it was, on the contrary, a deviation from t his teaching." (12) The Church of the First Three Centuries 1865 Alvan Lamson " . . . The modern doctrine of the Trinity is not found in any document or relic belonging to the Church of the first three centuries. . . so far as any remains or any record of them are preserved, coming down from early times, are, as rega rds this doctrine an absolute blank. They testify, so far as they testify at all , to the supremacy of the father, the only true God; and to the inferior and der ived nature of the Son. There is nowhere among these remains a coequal trinity. . . but no un-divided three, -- coequal, infinite, self-existent, and eternal. T his was a conception to which the age had not arrived. It was of later origin." "The three-in-one/one-in-three mystery of Father, Son and Holy Ghost made trithe ism official. The subsequent almost-deification of the Virgin Mary made it quatr otheism . . . Finally, cart-loads of saints raised to quarter-deification turned Christianity into plain old-fashioned polytheism. By the time of the Crusades, it was the most polytheistic religion to ever have existed, with the possible ex ception of Hinduism. This untenable contradiction between the assertion of monot heism and the reality of polytheism was dealt with by accusing other religions o f the Christian fault. The Church - Catholic and later Protestant - turned aggre ssively on the two most clearly monotheistic religions in view - Judaism and Isl am - and persecuted them as heathen or pagan. " (13) The Doubter's Companion (John Ralston Saul) "The external history of Chri stianity consists largely of accusations that other religions rely on the worshi p of more than one god and therefore not the true God. These pagans must therefo re be converted, conquered and/or killed for their own good in order that they b enefit from the singularity of the Holy Trinity, plus appendages." (14) Colliers Encyclopedia "In brief, the ante-Nicene Fathers taught the real distinction and divinity of the three persons . . . but in their attempts at a philosophical interpretation of the Dogma, the ante-Nicene Fathers used certain expressions which would favor sudordinationism. In the late 17th century, the So cinians cited these expressions that the ante-Nicene tradition agreed rather wit h Arius than with Athanasius . . . Catholic theologians commonly defend the orth odoxy of these early Fathers, while admitting that certain of their expressions were inaccurate and eventually dangerous." (15) The Nouveau Dictionnaire Universel, "The Platonic trinity, itself merely a rearrangement of older trinities dating back to earlier peoples, appears to be t he rational philosophic trinity of attributes that gave birth to the three hypos

tases or divine persons taught by the Christian churches . . . This Greek philos opher's [Plato, fourth century B.C.E.] conception of the divine trinity . . . ca n be found in all the ancient [pagan] religions." -- (Paris, 1865-1870), edited by M. Lachtre, Vol. 2, p. 1467. (16) Dictionary of the Bible by John L. McKenzie, S.J. p. 899 "The belief as so defined was reached only in the 4th and 5th centuries AD and hence is not exp licitly and formally a biblical belief. The trinity of persons within the unity of nature is defined in terms of "person" and "nature: which are Gk philosophica l terms; actually the terms do not appear in the Bible. The trinitarian definiti ons arose as the result of long controversies in which these terms and others su ch as "essense" and "substance" were erroneously applied to God by some theologi ans." (17) Quoting Bruce L. Shelley, a writer for Christian History, we read: "The Council of Nicea, (was) summoned by Emperor Constantine and held in the imp erial palace under his auspices. Constantine viewed the Arian teachings-that Jes us was a created being subordinate to God-as an 'insignificant' theological matt er. But he wanted peace in the empire he had just united through force. When dip lomatic letters failed to solve the dispute, he convened around 220 bishops, who met for two months to hammer out a universally acceptable definition of Jesus C hrist. "The expression homo ousion, 'one substance,' was probably introduced by Bishop Hosius of Cordova (in today's Spain). Since he had great influence with Constant ine, the imperial weight was thrown to that side of the scales. . . . As it turn ed out, however, Nicea alone settled little. For the next century the Nicene and the Arian views of Christ battled for supremacy. First Constantine and then his successors stepped in again and again to banish this churchman or exile that on e. Control of church offices too often depended on control of the emperor's favo r." [Christian History, Bruce L. Shelley, "The First Council of Nicea," Issue 28 (Vol. IX, No. 4), 1990, p. 11. ] (18) Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History, The Council of Nice, Isaac Boyle, p. 27.] Furthermore, John 1:1 could not be a proof of the Trinity, for no mention is made of the holy Spirit. That is most embarrassing when the key scripture to th e whole Trinity concept omits one-third of the Trinity. Therefore, whatever John 1:1 proves, it does not mention the holy Spirit, and it fails to provide the th ird part necessary to support the Trinity. Trinitarians have combed through the Bible using every possible text to prove their point. In the overwhelming majori ty of texts used, you find them doing the same thing as in John 1:1, using argum ents that God and Jesus are one, hoping we will not notice that none of their pr oof verses include the third part necessary - the holy Spirit. The idea is to ge t people so involved in the discussion that they will forget the holy Spirit is not mentioned. Therefore, the debate lacks the third part needed for rational pr oof. In order to prove the Trinity doctrine, it is necessary to find Biblical st atements of the oneness of being of Father, Son and holy Spirit. Even if we coul d prove the Father and Son were one being, would it give us a Trinity? When th e Nicean Council ended on August 25, 325 A.D., Emperor Constantine delayed the f estivities of his twentieth anniversary until the close of this council. We quot e the following: "A magnificent entertainment was provided by that prince, 'for the ministers of God' . . . No one of the bishops was absent from the imperial banquet, which was more admirably conducted than can possibly be described. The guards and soldier s, disposed in a circle, were stationed at the entrance of the palace with drawn swords. The men of God passed through the midst of them without fear, and went into the most private apartments of the royal edifice. Some of them were then ad mitted to the table of the emperor, and others took the places assigned them on either side. It was a lively image of the kingdom of Christ(?), and appeared mor e like a dream than a reality." (19) Edward Gibbon says, in his preface to History of Christianity: "If Paganism was conquered by Christianity, it is equally true that Christianity was corrupt ed by Paganism. The pure Deism of the first Christians . . . was changed, by the Church of Rome, into the incomprehensible dogma of the trinity. Many of the pag

an tenets, invented by the Egyptians and idealized by Plato, were retained as be ing worthy of belief."8 [History of Christianity, Edward Gibbon, preface. ] Not e: Gibbon is an historian's historian. He would not speak so forthrightly withou t an enormous basis for his evaluations. (20) Outline of History, H. G. Wells, p. 421. Commenting on the state of affai rs in the early Church, H. G. Wells writes: "We shall see presently how, later o n, all Christendom was torn by disputes about the Trinity. There is no clear evi dence that the apostles of Jesus entertained that doctrine."

Part Two: INTRODUCTION, covering many Bible scriptures that clearly show this doctrine can NOT be true which all can check for themselves in their own Bible. Many believe in the False Dogma of the Trinity and really have only a superficia l knowledge of the Theology. So before I discuss this false doctrine using only the Bible I am going into what this false theology really is from an impeccable source. The Trinitarian dogma, The Cyclopoedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiasti cal Literature, New York 1871, by John M'Clintock and James Strong, Vol. II, pag e 560-561, states, "We worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity; neither confounding the persons, nor dividing the substance. For there is one person of the Father, anot her of the Son, and another of the Holy Ghost. But the Godhead of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost is all one: the glory equal, the majesty coetern al. Such as the Father is, such is the Son, and such is the Holy Ghost.....The F ather eternal, the Son eternal, and the Holy Ghost eternal...So likewise the Fat her is almighty, the Son almighty, and the Holy Ghost almighty...So the Father i s God, the Son is God, and the Holy Ghost is God. And yet there are not three Go ds, but one God...The Father is made of none, neither created nor begotten. The Son is of the Father alone; not made, nor created, but begotten. The Holy Ghost is of the Father and of the Son; neither made, nor created, nor begotten, but pr oceeding...And in this Trinity none is afore or after other; none is greater or less than another. But the whole three persons are coeternal together, and coequ al. So that in all things, as is afore said, the Unity in Trinity and the Trinit y in Unity is to be worshipped. He therefore that will be saved must thus think of the Trinity." [this is the Athanasian Creed quoted in the above mentioned Cyc lopoedia]. Now lets see what the Bible (King James Bible; KJB): I FIRST, IT SAYS AT MANY PLACES THE FOLLOWING: Matthew 4:3 And when the tempter came to him, he said, If thou be the Son of God , command that these stones be made bread. Matthew 4:6 And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: fo r it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their h ands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a ston e. Matthew 8:29 And, behold, they cried out, saying, What have we to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God? art thou come hither to torment us before the time? Matthew 14:33 Then they that were in the ship came and worshipped him, saying, O f a truth thou art the Son of God. Matthew 26:63 But Jesus held his peace. And the high priest answered and said un to him, I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the C hrist, the Son of God.

Matthew 27:40 And saying, Thou that destroyest the temple, and buildest it in th ree days, save thyself. If thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross. Matthew 27:43 He trusted in God; let him deliver him now, if he will have him: f or he said, I am the Son of God. Matthew 27:54 Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesu s, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, say ing, Truly this was the Son of God. Mark 1:1 The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God; Mark 3:11 And unclean spirits, when they saw him, fell down before him, and crie d, saying, Thou art the Son of God. Mark 15:39 And when the centurion, which stood over against him, saw that he so cried out, and gave up the ghost, he said, Truly this man was the Son of God. Luke 1:35 And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come up on thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God. Luke 3:38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the so n of Adam, which was the son of God. Luke 4:3 And the devil said unto him, If thou be the Son of God, command this st one that it be made bread. Luke 4:9 And he brought him to Jerusalem, and set him on a pinnacle of the templ e, and said unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down from hence: Luke 4:41 And devils also came out of many, crying out, and saying, Thou art Chr ist the Son of God. And he rebuking them suffered them not to speak: for they kn ew that he was Christ. Luke 8:28 When he saw Jesus, he cried out, and fell down before him, and with a loud voice said, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God most high? I beseech thee, torment me not. Luke 22:70 Then said they all, Art thou then the Son of God? And he said unto th em, Ye say that I am. John 1:34 And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God. John 1:49 Nathanael answered and saith unto him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel. John 3:18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not i s condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begott en Son of God. John 5:25 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when t he dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live. John 9:35 Jesus heard that they had cast him out; and when he had found him, he said unto him, Dost thou believe on the Son of God? John 10:36 Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the wor ld, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God? John 11:4 When Jesus heard that, he said, This sickness is not unto death, but f or the glory of God, that the Son of God might be glorified thereby. John 11:27 She saith unto him, Yea, Lord: I believe that thou art the Christ, th e Son of God, which should come into the world. John 19:7 The Jews answered him, We have a law, and by our law he ought to die, because he made himself the Son of God. John 20:31 But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ , the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name. Acts 8:37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. Acts 9:20 And straightway he preached Christ in the synagogues, that he is the S on of God. Romans 1:4 And declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead: 2 Corinthians 1:19 For the Son of God, Jesus Christ, who was preached among you by us, even by me and Silvanus and Timotheus, was not yea and nay, but in him wa s yea. Galatians 2:20 I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but C hrist liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the fai

th of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. Ephesians 4:13 Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fu lness of Christ: Hebrews 4:14 Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into t he heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession. Hebrews 6:6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame. Hebrews 7:3 Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither begi nning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a pri est continually. Hebrews 10:29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought wort hy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of th e covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace? 1 John 3:8 He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from th e beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destr oy the works of the devil. 1 John 4:15 Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth i n him, and he in God. 1 John 5:5 Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God? 1 John 5:10 He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son. 1 John 5:12 He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life. 1 John 5:13 These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God. 1 John 5:20 And we know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an unders tanding, that we may know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life. Now we noted in all the above Scriptures it calls Jesus Christ (Yeshua) the Son of God; interesting since for if the Trinity was true, it would read God the Son instead of the Son of God. Since it reads the same in every translation I know of except one "feminists" biased Bible, where it reads Daughter of God which I a m sure none of you would agree with. Therefore, it is self evident that Jesus is God's (YHWH) son and not God the Son as would be technically necessary for the trinity to be true. II THE BIBLE EXPLICITLY SAYS: 12 Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light: 13 Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son: 14 In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins: 15 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: 16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth , visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalitie s, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: 17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. 18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstbo rn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence. [Col. 1:12-1 8 AV &#8211; KJB] We see here that Jesus is God&#8217;s (YHWH) dear son and that Jesus is the firs

tborn of every creature; whereas, God clearly had no beginning as you all well k now. Once again the Trinity is shown as impossible of being true, thus it is fal se dogma. III THE BIBLE EXPLICITLY SHOWS JESUS (YESHUA) ASKING HIS FATHER, ALMIGHTY GOD (Y HWH) TO GLORIFY HIM IN A PRAYER AS FOLLOWS: 1 These words spake Jesus, and lifted up his eyes to heaven, and said, Father, t he hour is come; glorify thy Son, that thy Son also may glorify thee: 2 As thou hast given him power over all flesh, that he should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given him. 3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jes us Christ, whom thou hast sent. 4 I have glorified thee on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do. 5 And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was. 6 I have manifested thy name unto the men which thou gavest me out of the world: thine they were, and thou gavest them me; and they have kept thy word. 7 Now they have known that all things whatsoever thou hast given me are of thee. 8 For I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me; and they have recei ved them, and have known surely that I came out from thee, and they have believe d that thou didst send me. 9 I pray for them: I pray not for the world, but for them which thou hast given me; for they are thine. 10 And all mine are thine, and thine are mine; and I am glorified in them. 11 And now I am no more in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to thee. Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, th at they may be one, as we are. 12 While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition; that the scripture might be fulfilled. [John 17.1-12 AV] Here Jesus is clearly praying to his Father as a more powerful one and not to an other part of himself as would be required by false Trinitarian Theology. IV THE BIBLE CLEARLY SAYS "AND BEING FOUND IN FASHION AS A MAN, HE HUMBLED HIMSE LF, AND BECAME OBEDIENT UNTO DEATH, EVEN THE DEATH OF THE CROSS."THIS SCRIPTURE CLEARLY SHOWS JESUS (YESHUA) TO BE AN OBEDIENT SON TO HIS FATHER (YHWH). 1 If there be therefore any consolation in Christ, if any comfort of love, if an y fellowship of the Spirit, if any bowels and mercies, 2 Fulfil ye my joy, that ye be likeminded, having the same love, being of one ac cord, of one mind. 3 Let nothing be done through strife or vainglory; but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than themselves. 4 Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of othe rs. 5 Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: 6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: 7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, an d was made in the likeness of men: 8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient u nto death, even the death of the cross. 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is abov e every name: 10 That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and thi ngs in earth, and things under the earth; 11 And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory

of God the Father. [Phil. 2:1-11 AV] And verse 11 clearly shows hierarchy of power in Heaven since it says we should confess Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God. Showing that recognizing Jesus as the Son of God brings glory to his Father (YHWH). Clearly, therefore, Trinit arian theology can not be true, hence it is therefore FALSE. V AS WE ALL KNOW THE GIVER AND THE RECEIVER CAN NOT BE THE SAME, THE BIBLE SHOWS THAT JESUS (YESHUA) WAS GIVEN POWER BY HIS FATHER (YHWH). 49 Jesus answered, I have not a devil; but I honour my Father, and ye do dishono ur me. 50 And I seek not mine own glory: there is one that seeketh and judgeth. 51 Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep my saying, he shall never see d eath. 52 Then said the Jews unto him, Now we know that thou hast a devil. Abraham is d ead, and the prophets; and thou sayest, If a man keep my saying, he shall never taste of death. 53 Art thou greater than our father Abraham, which is dead? and the prophets are dead: whom makest thou thyself? 54 Jesus answered, If I honour myself, my honour is nothing: it is my Father tha t honoureth me; of whom ye say, that he is your God: 55 Yet ye have not known him; but I know him: and if I should say, I know him no t, I shall be a liar like unto you: but I know him, and keep his saying. 56 Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad. 57 Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? 58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I a m. 59 Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by. [John 8:49-59 AV]. Once more Jesus (Yeshua) says, &#8220;Jesus answered, I have not a devil; but I honour my Father, and ye do dishonour me.&#8221; Clearly showing his Father (YHW H) was a distinct entity and that Jesus (Yeshua) was doing works to honor his Fa ther (YHWH). Once more it is explicitly shown that the Trinity doctrine is false and a messed up belief. VI JESUS (YESHUA) CLEARLY SAID HE COULD DO NOTHING OF HIS OWN INITIATIVE, BUT ON LY WHAT HE BEHOLDS THE FATHER (YHWH) DOING: 7 The impotent man answered him, Sir, I have no man, when the water is troubled, to put me into the pool: but while I am coming, another steppeth down before me . 8 Jesus saith unto him, Rise, take up thy bed, and walk. 9 And immediately the man was made whole, and took up his bed, and walked: and o n the same day was the sabbath. 10 The Jews therefore said unto him that was cured, It is the sabbath day: it is not lawful for thee to carry thy bed. 11 He answered them, He that made me whole, the same said unto me, Take up thy b ed, and walk. 12 Then asked they him, What man is that which said unto thee, Take up thy bed, and walk? 13 And he that was healed wist not who it was: for Jesus had conveyed himself aw ay, a multitude being in that place. 14 Afterward Jesus findeth him in the temple, and said unto him, Behold, thou ar t made whole: sin no more, lest a worse thing come unto thee. 15 The man departed, and told the Jews that it was Jesus, which had made him who le.

16 And therefore did the Jews persecute Jesus, and sought to slay him, because h e had done these things on the sabbath day. 17 But Jesus answered them, My Father worketh hitherto, and I work. 18 Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broke n the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God. 19 Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The S on can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things s oever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise. 20 For the Father loveth the Son, and sheweth him all things that himself doeth: and he will shew him greater works than these, that ye may marvel. 21 For as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them; even so the Son q uickeneth whom he will. 22 For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son: 23 That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that h onoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him. [John 5:19 AV ] Clearly, Jesus (Yeshua) is obedient to his Father (YHWH) a superior one and by b eing obedient brings honour to his Father (YHWH). Also, in this situation, Jesus (Yeshua) once more is shown to be the receiver and his Father the giver. This w ould be impossible under Trinitarian Theology as it maintains they are one Godhe ad so either the Bible is wrong or Trinitarian Theology is wrong. I am as a true follower of Jesus (Yeshau) taking the Bible, God's written word for our guidanc e, as correct; whereas, many wrongly take the false doctrine of the Trinity as c orrect. Now stand up and show whether you are for the Bible or for the Trinity. VII NOW THE BIBLE EXPLICITLY SHOWS THE CHAIN-OF-COMMAND; FROM ALMIGHTY GOD (YHWH ) ON DOWN AS FOLLOWS: "But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head o f the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God" (1 Corinthians 11:3 AV) This scripture clearly shows that the 'head of Christ is God' so the Trinity is once more shown to be false and the Bible shown to be true. As we can now all see we should stand up for the Bible and not the false doctrin e of the Trinity.

Part Three: THE TRINITY OF THREE SCRIPTURES DESTROYS THE MYTH OF THE TRINITY: The commonly believed myth or false doctrine of the Trinity brought into so call ed Christianity by the largest cult on earth that has permeated through so many groups because of the baggage carried by many who left/escaped this cult that co uld not for one reason or the other cut lose of the false doctrines of the cult have contaminated most of Christendom. However, the Bible truths from just three scriptures destroy it as follows: FIRST: John 1:1, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Wor d was God." (New English Translation; NEB) John 1:1, " In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Wo rd was God." (American Standard Version; ASV) Neither mention in any way more than two beings, yet a trinity of anything requi res three similar things.

SECOND: John 1:2, "The Word, then, was with God at the beginning, "(New English Translat ion; NEB) John 1:2, "The same was in the beginning with God." (American Standard Version; ASV) Clearly states that the word, Jesus (Yeshua) was with God (YHWH) in the beginnin g, referring back to Genesis 1:1-2, "In the beginning God created the heavens an d the earth. 2 And the earth was waste and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep: and the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters." (ASV) whe n he and his Son started to create the earth and all on it. THIRD: John 14:28, "Ye heard how I said to you, I go away, and I come unto you. If ye l oved me, ye would have rejoiced, because I go unto the Father: for the Father is greater than I." Jesus (Yeshua) clearly stated, "for the Father is greater than I." Showing the F ather (YHWH) was greater as we all know Jesus (Yeshua) would not lie. So we can NOW all see this myth is just that and actually just false doctrine ba ggage from the world's largest cult and those believing it are thoroughly delude d. The persons believing this myth post false hate literature against those exposin g their 'pet' myth, so be ye not surprised at ones using this evil tactic. To learn more and get the facts which you should check with your own Bible in ke eping with Acts 17:11, " Now these were more noble than those in Thessalonica, w ho received the word with all eagerness, daily searching the scriptures, whether these things were so." (Douay-Rheims Catholic Bible; DRCB). Now to know the truth, go to: 1) 2) 3) http://religioustruths.yuku.com/ http://www.network54.com/Forum/403209/ http://religioustruths.lefora.com/

TRYING TO KEEP PEOPLE FROM LEARNING THE TRUTH IS JUST PLAIN WICKED AND EVIL, may Almighty God (YHWH) punish him. If you wish more information and/or wish to ask a question or what ever, contact me by leaving a PM (personal message) at http://religioustruths.yuku.com/ Your Friend in Christ Iris89 Francis David said it long ago, "Neither the sword of popes...nor the image of d eath will halt the march of truth."Francis David, 1579, written on the wall of h is prison cell." Read the book, "What Does The Bible Really Teach" and the Bible t oday!