Digital Book on Land Title LAND TITLE by Iris: [1] Some Know Neither Land Title Is Nor History

[2] Some Do NOT Understand The Difference Between Title and Occupancy [3] Land Theft Of Seventh Century Responsible For Middle East Problems of Today: [4] Who Is The Occupier? A Study of The Land Of Palestine By A None Jew [5] What Is An Occupation, And Who Is An Occupier? [6] Summary On Land Title [1] Some Know Neither What Land Title Is Nor History INTRODUCTION: Some who know nothing with respect land title nor history make following erroneo us comments such as the following: You say "WRONG, Stolen property should be returned to its original owners and time is NO T a factor." Does this mean the Americas should be returned to the surviving original ihnabit ants, native americans? Which clearly show their lack of knowledge of both what Land Title is and the hi story of the new world, North America. With respect to whom does NOT have land title; This brings up the interesting fa ct that one can have possession without having a valid title to land. A good exa mple is that of nomadic tribes in the middle east and elsewhere such as the Berb ers and the New World Indians, they had possession, but not title to the land th ey roamed. [Special note - in the early 1800's some New World Indians were grant ed title in the form of a titled reservation.] The first granting of title occurred around 1,500 B.C. when the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael gave land title to the ancient Hebrews, nation of Israel, to perpetuity. Before that no one had title, but only possession of lan d; to wit, that was the beginning of land titlement. And this was by the highest possible authority of all, the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael, the highest authority in the universe so his absolu te right to grant title to whom he pleased is of course beyond challenge. INDIANS COULD NOT UNDER ANY THEORY EVEN ERRONEOUS ONES HAVE TITLE: For many years it was commonly, but wrongly thought, that the nomadic people now called Indians (American) were the first inhabitants of North America, but rece ntly archaeology has clearly shown the first inhabitants who were here before th e arrival of the ancestors of present day Indians (American) were the Clovis peo ple. At first archaeologist believed the Clovis people were the early ancestors of the Indians (American); but now this has been shown to be in error. How so? L et s look at that!

First, as archaeologist dug up more Clovis sites, especially the ones in South C arolina, USA, and examined the artifacts they came to realize that the arrow poi nts and other items of the Clovis people resembled those of ancient tribes in wh at is now France, and not those of the Indians (American). This distinct differe nce marked the Clovis people to be of European origin and NOT Asian origin as wa s the origin of the Indians (American). It appears the Clovis people made their way in boats along the edges of the last ice age to North America from Europe. Second, No Indian (American) artifacts were found near or below the ash layer da ted approximately 12,900 years ago; whereas, below this ash layer only Clovis pe ople artifacts have been found so reality they were the first to have possession and NOT the Indians (American). Third, The heaviest concentration of Clovis people artifacts was on the east coa st of North America; whereas, the heaviest concentration of early Indian (Americ an) artifacts was on the west coast of North America. As can be seen, any claim, of first possession of North America would belong to the Clovis people who were European in origin, but neither they or the Indians ( American) ever held land title. Now let s look at what land title is and is NOT! WHAT LAND TITLE IS AND IS NOT: Some do not understand the difference between title and occupancy. Let's look at what these both are: TITLE - is a legal term for a bundle of rights in a piece of property in which a party may own either a legal interest or an equitable interest[1] The rights in the bundle may be separated and held by different parties. It may also refer to a formal document that serves as evidence of ownership. Conveyance of the docum ent may be required in order to transfer ownership in the property to another pe rson. Title is distinct from possession, a right that often accompanies ownershi p but is not necessarily sufficient to prove it. In many cases, both possession and title may be transferred independently of each other. POSSESSION - is the actual holding of a thing, whether or not one has any right to do so. The right of possession is the legitimacy of possession (with or witho ut actual possession), the evidence for which is such that the law will uphold i t unless a better claim is proven. The right of property is that right which, if all relevant facts were known (and allowed), would defeat all other claims. Eac h of these may be in a different person. For example, suppose A steals from B, what B had previously bought in good faith from C, which C had earlier stolen from D, which had been an heirloom of D's fa mily for generations, but had originally been stolen centuries earlier (though t his fact is now forgotten by all) from E. Here A has the possession, B has an ap parent right of possession (as evidenced by the purchase), D has the absolute ri ght of possession (being the best claim that can be proven), and the heirs of E, if they knew it, have the right of property, which they cannot prove. Good titl e consists in uniting these three (possession, right of possession, and right of property) in the same person(s). Now, if the financed automobile referenced above was purchased by a company and was being loaned out by a car rental organization, the person who rented the veh icle would have possession; the rental company would be the registered owner and have right of possession, while again, the lienholder would have right of prope rty. [reference - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki /Title_(property)].

Now TITLE must be publically anounced. In ancient times this was done by publica tion on scrools, stone slabs, and other writing means after the first ever assig nment of title example recorded in the Book of Numbers, 34 th. Chapter, in the T orah, now the first five parts of the the inspired word of Almighty God (YHWH), the Bible, by Moses, the choosen prophet Moses (Mosche) as follows: Numbers 34 th Chapter, "And Jehovah spake unto Moses, saying, 2 Command the children of Israel, and say unto them, When ye come into the land of Canaan (this is the land that shall fall unto you for an inheritance, even th e land of Canaan according to the borders thereof), 3 then your south quarter shall be from the wilderness of Zin along by the side of Edom, and your south border shall be from the end of the Salt Sea eastward; 4 and your border shall turn about southward of the ascent of Akrabbim, and pass along to Zin; and the goings out thereof shall be southward of Kadesh-barnea; a nd it shall go forth to Hazar-addar, and pass along to Azmon; 5 and the border shall turn about from Azmon unto the brook of Egypt, and the go ings out thereof shall be at the sea. 6 And for the western border, ye shall have the great sea and the border thereof : this shall be your west border. 7 And this shall be your north border: from the great sea ye shall mark out for you mount Hor; 8 from mount Hor ye shall mark out unto the entrance of Hamath; and the goings o ut of the border shall be at Zedad; 9 and the border shall go forth to Ziphron, and the goings out thereof shall be at Hazar-enan: this shall be your north border. 10 And ye shall mark out your east border from Hazar-enan to Shepham; 11 and the border shall go down from Shepham to Riblah, on the east side of Ain; and the border shall go down, and shall reach unto the side of the sea of Chinn ereth eastward; 12 and the border shall go down to the Jordan, and the goings out thereof shall be at the Salt Sea. This shall be your land according to the borders thereof rou nd about. 13 And Moses commanded the children of Israel, saying, This is the land which ye shall inherit by lot, which Jehovah hath commanded to give unto the nine tribes , and to the half-tribe; 14 for the tribe of the children of Reuben according to their fathers' houses, a nd the tribe of the children of Gad according to their fathers' houses, have rec eived, and the half-tribe of Manasseh have received, their inheritance: 15 the two tribes and the half-tribe have received their inheritance beyond the Jordan at Jericho eastward, toward the sunrising. 16 And Jehovah spake unto Moses, saying, 17 These are the names of the men that shall divide the land unto you for inheri tance: Eleazar the priest, and Joshua the son of Nun. 18 And ye shall take one prince of every tribe, to divide the land for inheritan ce. 19 And these are the names of the men: Of the tribe of Judah, Caleb the son of J ephunneh. 20 And of the tribe of the children of Simeon, Shemuel the son of Ammihud. 21 Of the tribe of Benjamin, Elidad the son of Chislon. 22 And of the tribe of the children of Dan a prince, Bukki the son of Jogli. 23 Of the children of Joseph: of the tribe of the children of Manasseh a prince, Hanniel the son of Ephod. 24 And of the tribe of the children of Ephraim a prince, Kemuel the son of Shiph tan. 25 And of the tribe of the children of Zebulun a prince, Elizaphan the son of Pa rnach. 26 And of the tribe of the children of Issachar a prince, Paltiel the son of Azz an. 27 And of the tribe of the children of Asher a prince, Ahihud the son of Shelomi

. 28 And of the tribe of the children of Naphtali a prince, Pedahel the son of Amm ihud. 29 These are they whom Jehovah commanded to divide the inheritance unto the chil dren of Israel in the land of Canaan." (American Standard Version; ASV). This constituted the first ever granting of real title to land in the chronologi cal course of human history, and this by the highest possible authority, Almight y God (YHWH), the Creator of all there is who has the absolute right to give wha t he wants to whom he wants. This brings up the interesting fact that one can have possession without having a valid title to land. A good example is that of nomadic tribes in the middle ea st and elsewhere such as the Berbers and the New World Indians, they had possess ion, but not title to the land they roamed. [Special note - in the early 1800's some New World Indians were granted title in the form of a titled reservation.] FIRST GRANTING OF TITLE AND SOUNDNESS OF TITLE: The first granting of title occurred around 1,500 B.C. when the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael gave land title to the ancient Hebrews, nation of Israel, to perpetuity. Before that no one had title, but only possession of lan d; to wit, that was the beginning of land titlement. And this was by the highest possible authority of all, the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael, the highest authority in the universe so his absolu te right to grant title to whom he pleased is of course beyond challenge. Also, the soundness of title depends on several factors or conditions precedent: First, the higher the position of the granter the more legitimate the title is w ith the highest granter being, of course, the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael, the supreme being. This followed by E mperors, Kings or Caliphs, and Presidents or Sultans in that order. REAL LIFE EXAMPLE OF POSESSION STOLEN IN WARFARE: A Roman emperor had conveyed title to land in Spain to his subjects who were in possession in the early part of the common error, but in 711 A.D. much of this l and was stolen from the possessors. Let's look at the historical notes on this f rom a Muslim source, www.sunnahonline.com , <<<" By 700 CE, with famine in the T oledo, strife among the aristocracy and chaos throughout the peninsula, the Visi gothic kingdom was falling apart. This paved the way for the Muslim invasion of 711, which set Spain's destiny quite apart from the rest of Europe. Following the death of the Prophet (saaw) in 632 CE, the Arabs had spread throug h the Middle East and North Africa, bringing Islam with them. According to myth, they were ushered onto the Iberian Peninsula by the sexual exploits of the last Visigoth king, Roderick. Ballads and chronicles relate how he had seduced the y oung Florinda, daughter of Julian, Visigothic governor of Ceuta in north Africa: and how Julian sought revenge by approaching the Muslims with a plan to invade Spain. In dull fact, Julian probably just wanted help in a struggle for the Visi goth throne. In 711 CE Tariq ibn Ziyad, the governor of Tangiers, landed in Gibraltar with ar ound 10,000 men, mostly Berbers (indigenous North Africans). He had some of Rode rick's Visigoth rivals as allies. In the same or following year in the Cadiz pro vince, Roderick's army was decimated and he is thought to have drowned as he fle d. The Visigothic survivors fled to the north of Spain, and within a few years, the Muslims had taken over the rest of the Iberian Peninsula bar a few areas in the Asturian Mountains bordering France" [source - http://www.sunnahonline.com/i

lm/seerah/0075_intro.htm]>>>; these Muslims became possessors of the land of Spa in, but they did NOT hold title, and were eventually thrown out and the land ret urned to those holding legitimate title with this being concluded around 1492 A. D. A wrongful possession rectified. This same wrongful situation occurred elsewhere with possession being gained onc e more in warfare and violence, now let's look at another example from a Muslim source, www.sunnahonline.com/ilm/seerah/ , <<<" In April 1453, the Turks laid si ege to Constantinople. Despite the heavy Turkish bombardment of the walls, the i nhabitants of the city were able to repair the fortifications every night. The B yzantines were exhausted but took solace in the old legend that Constantinople w ould never fall while the Moon was waxing. Then, on the night of 22 May, the Moo n rose in eclipse and their morale was crushed. Mohammed knew of the legend and waited a few days before starting a fresh attack . During the battle a small gate was left open by accident but it was all the Tu rks needed. The sack of Constantinople lasted three days, as the Moon waned." [s ource - http://www.sunnahonline.com/ilm/seerah/]>>>; <<<"unfortunately the legit imate title holders have not regained rightful possession to their legitimate pr operty as yet from those holding possession by force of arms. Yet the property a nd title really belongs to the Byzantines who centuries earlier had been given t itle by a Roman Emperor" [Note, earlier title granting takes precedence over lat er title granting.].[source - Possession is NOT The Same As Title to Land: at, [ http://religioustruths.proboards59.com/ind...read=1164667454 ]>>> The distorted Bible knockoff, the Quran, gives abundant testimony to the existen ce to the ancient kingdom of the Hebrews that has recently come out of a long hi atus. This will now be shown from three different versions of the Quran that tes tify to this kingdom under King Solomon and a visit by the Queen of Sheba. AN-NAML (THE ANT, THE ANTS), Sura 27: 027.020 YUSUFALI: And he took a muster of the Birds; and he said: "Why is it I see not t he Hoopoe? Or is he among the absentees? PICKTHAL: And he sought among the birds and said: How is it that I see not the h oopoe, or is he among the absent? SHAKIR: And he reviewed the birds, then said: How is it I see not the hoopoe or is it that he is of the absentees? 027.021 YUSUFALI: "I will certainly punish him with a severe penalty, or execute him, un less he bring me a clear reason (for absence)." PICKTHAL: I verily will punish him with hard punishment or I verily will slay hi m, or he verily shall bring me a plain excuse. SHAKIR: I will most certainly punish him with a severe punishment, or kill him, or he shall bring to me a clear plea. 027.022 YUSUFALI: But the Hoopoe tarried not far: he (came up and) said: "I have compass ed (territory) which thou hast not compassed, and I have come to thee from Saba with tidings true. PICKTHAL: But he was not long in coming, and he said: I have found out (a thing) that thou apprehendest not, and I come unto thee from Sheba with sure tidings. SHAKIR: And he tarried not long, then said: I comprehend that which you do not c

omprehend and I have brought to you a sure information from Sheba. 027.023 YUSUFALI: "I found (there) a woman ruling over them and provided with every requ isite; and she has a magnificent throne. PICKTHAL: Lo! I found a woman ruling over them, and she hath been given (abundan ce) of all things, and hers is a mighty throne. SHAKIR: Surely I found a woman ruling over them, and she has been given abundanc e and she has a mighty throne: 027.024 YUSUFALI: "I found her and her people worshipping the sun besides Allah: Satan h as made their deeds seem pleasing in their eyes, and has kept them away from the Path,- so they receive no guidance,PICKTHAL: I found her and her people worshipping the sun instead of Allah; and S atan maketh their works fairseeming unto them, and debarreth them from the way ( of Truth), so that they go not aright; SHAKIR: I found her and her people adoring the sun instead of Allah, and the Sha itan has made their deeds fair-seeming to them and thus turned them from the way , so they do not go aright 027.025 YUSUFALI: "(Kept them away from the Path), that they should not worship Allah, W ho brings to light what is hidden in the heavens and the earth, and knows what y e hide and what ye reveal. PICKTHAL: So that they worship not Allah, Who bringeth forth the hidden in the h eavens and the earth, and knoweth what ye hide and what ye proclaim, SHAKIR: That they do not make obeisance to Allah, Who brings forth what is hidde n in the heavens and the earth and knows what you hide and what you make manifes t: 027.026 YUSUFALI: "Allah!- there is no god but He!- Lord of the Throne Supreme!" PICKTHAL: Allah; there is no Allah save Him, the Lord of the Tremendous Throne. SHAKIR: Allah, there is no god but He: He is the Lord of mighty power. 027.027 YUSUFALI: (Solomon) said: "Soon shall we see whether thou hast told the truth or lied! PICKTHAL: (Solomon) said: We shall see whether thou speakest truth or whether th ou art of the liars. SHAKIR: He said: We will see whether you have told the truth or whether you are of the liars: 027.028 YUSUFALI: "Go thou, with this letter of mine, and deliver it to them: then draw back from them, and (wait to) see what answer they return"... PICKTHAL: Go with this my letter and throw it down unto them; then turn away and see what (answer) they return,

SHAKIR: Take this my letter and hand it over to them, then turn away from them a nd see what (answer) they return. 027.029 YUSUFALI: (The queen) said: "Ye chiefs! here is delivered to me - a letter worth y of respect. PICKTHAL: (The Queen of Sheba) said (when she received the letter): O chieftains ! Lo! there hath been thrown unto me a noble letter. SHAKIR: She said: O chief! surely an honorable letter has been delivered to me 027.030 YUSUFALI: "It is from Solomon, and is (as follows): 'In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful: PICKTHAL: Lo! it is from Solomon, and lo! it is: In the name of Allah, the Benef icent, the Merciful; SHAKIR: Surely it is from Sulaiman, and surely it is in the name of Allah, the B eneficent, the Merciful; 027.031 YUSUFALI: "'Be ye not arrogant against me, but come to me in submission (to the true Religion).'" PICKTHAL: Exalt not yourselves against me, but come unto me as those who surrend er. SHAKIR: Saying: exalt not yourselves against me and come to me in submission. 027.032 YUSUFALI: She said: "Ye chiefs! advise me in (this) my affair: no affair have I decided except in your presence." PICKTHAL: She said: O chieftains! Pronounce for me in my case. I decide no case till ye are present with me. SHAKIR: She said: O chiefs! give me advice respecting my affair: I never decide an affair until you are in my presence. 027.033 YUSUFALI: They said: "We are endued with strength, and given to vehement war: bu t the command is with thee; so consider what thou wilt command." PICKTHAL: They said: We are lords of might and lords of great prowess, but it is for thee to command; so consider what thou wilt command. SHAKIR: They said: We are possessors of strength and possessors of mighty prowes s, and the command is yours, therefore see what you will command. 027.034 YUSUFALI: She said: "Kings, when they enter a country, despoil it, and make the noblest of its people its meanest thus do they behave. PICKTHAL: She said: Lo! kings, when they enter a township, ruin it and make the honour of its people shame. Thus will they do. SHAKIR: She said: Surely the kings, when they enter a town, ruin it and make the

noblest of its people to be low, and thus they (always) do; 027.035 YUSUFALI: "But I am going to send him a present, and (wait) to see with what (an swer) return (my) ambassadors." PICKTHAL: But lo! I am going to send a present unto them, and to see with what ( answer) the messengers return. SHAKIR: And surely I am going to send a present to them, and shall wait to see w hat (answer) do the messengers bring back. 027.036 YUSUFALI: Now when (the embassy) came to Solomon, he said: "Will ye give me abun dance in wealth? But that which Allah has given me is better than that which He has given you! Nay it is ye who rejoice in your gift! PICKTHAL: So when (the envoy) came unto Solomon, (the King) said: What! Would ye help me with wealth? But that which Allah hath given me is better than that whi ch He hath given you. Nay it is ye (and not I) who exult in your gift. SHAKIR: So when he came to Sulaiman, he said: What! will you help me with wealth ? But what Allah has given me is better than what He has given you. Nay, you are exultant because of your present; 027.037 YUSUFALI: "Go back to them, and be sure we shall come to them with such hosts as they will never be able to meet: We shall expel them from there in disgrace, an d they will feel humbled (indeed)." PICKTHAL: Return unto them. We verily shall come unto them with hosts that they cannot resist, and we shall drive them out from thence with shame, and they will be abased. SHAKIR: Go back to them, so we will most certainly come to them with hosts which they shall have no power to oppose, and we will most certainly expel them there from in abasement, and they shall be in a state of ignominy. 027.038 YUSUFALI: He said (to his own men): "Ye chiefs! which of you can bring me her th rone before they come to me in submission?" PICKTHAL: He said: O chiefs! Which of you will bring me her throne before they c ome unto me, surrendering? SHAKIR: He said: O chiefs! which of you can bring to me her throne before they c ome to me in submission? 027.039 YUSUFALI: Said an 'Ifrit, of the Jinns: "I will bring it to thee before thou ris e from thy council: indeed I have full strength for the purpose, and may be trus ted." PICKTHAL: A stalwart of the jinn said: I will bring it thee before thou canst ri se from thy place. Lo! I verily am strong and trusty for such work. SHAKIR: One audacious among the jinn said: I will bring it to you before you ris e up from your place; and most surely I am strong (and) trusty for it. 027.040

YUSUFALI: Said one who had knowledge of the Book: "I will bring it to thee withi n the twinkling of an eye!" Then when (Solomon) saw it placed firmly before him, he said: "This is by the Grace of my Lord!- to test me whether I am grateful or ungrateful! and if any is grateful, truly his gratitude is (a gain) for his own soul; but if any is ungrateful, truly my Lord is Free of all Needs, Supreme in Honour !" PICKTHAL: One with whom was knowledge of the Scripture said: I will bring it the e before thy gaze returneth unto thee. And when he saw it set in his presence, ( Solomon) said: This is of the bounty of my Lord, that He may try me whether I gi ve thanks or am ungrateful. Whosoever giveth thanks he only giveth thanks for (t he good of) his own soul; and whosoever is ungrateful (is ungrateful only to his own soul's hurt). For lo! my Lord is Absolute in independence, Bountiful. SHAKIR: One who had the knowledge of the Book said: I will bring it to you in th e twinkling of an eye. Then when he saw it settled beside him, he said: This is of the grace of my Lord that He may try me whether I am grateful or ungrateful; and whoever is grateful, he is grateful only for his own soul, and whoever is un grateful, then surely my Lord is Self-sufficient, Honored. 027.041 YUSUFALI: He said: "Transform her throne out of all recognition by her: let us s ee whether she is guided (to the truth) or is one of those who receive no guidan ce." PICKTHAL: He said: Disguise her throne for her that we may see whether she will go aright or be of those not rightly guided. SHAKIR: He said: Alter her throne for her, we will see whether she follows the r ight way or is of those who do not go aright. 027.042 YUSUFALI: So when she arrived, she was asked, "Is this thy throne?" She said, "I t was just like this; and knowledge was bestowed on us in advance of this, and w e have submitted to Allah (in Islam)." PICKTHAL: So, when she came, it was said (unto her): Is thy throne like this? Sh e said: (It is) as though it were the very one. And (Solomon said): We were give n the knowledge before her and we had surrendered (to Allah). SHAKIR: So when she came, it was said: Is your throne like this? She said: It is as it were the same, and we were given the knowledge before it, and we were sub missive. 027.043 YUSUFALI: And he diverted her from the worship of others besides Allah: for she was (sprung) of a people that had no faith. PICKTHAL: And (all) that she was wont to worship instead of Allah hindered her, for she came of disbelieving folk. SHAKIR: And what she worshipped besides Allah prevented her, surely she was of a n unbelieving people. 027.044 YUSUFALI: She was asked to enter the lofty Palace: but when she saw it, she thou ght it was a lake of water, and she (tucked up her skirts), uncovering her legs. He said: "This is but a palace paved smooth with slabs of glass." She said: "O my Lord! I have indeed wronged my soul: I do (now) submit (in Islam), with Solom on, to the Lord of the Worlds."

PICKTHAL: It was said unto her: Enter the hall. And when she saw it she deemed i t a pool and bared her legs. (Solomon) said: Lo! it is a hall, made smooth, of g lass. She said: My Lord! Lo! I have wronged myself, and I surrender with Solomon unto Allah, the Lord of the Worlds. SHAKIR: It was said to her: Enter the palace; but when she saw it she deemed it to be a great expanse of water, and bared her legs. He said: Surely it is a pala ce made smooth with glass. She said: My Lord! surely I have been unjust to mysel f, and I submit with Sulaiman to Allah, the Lord of the worlds. 027.045 YUSUFALI: We sent (aforetime), to the Thamud, their brother Salih, saying, "Serv e Allah": But behold, they became two factions quarrelling with each other. PICKTHAL: And We verily sent unto Thamud their brother Salih, saying: Worship Al lah. And lo! they (then became two parties quarrelling. SHAKIR: And certainly We sent to Samood their brother Salih, saying: Serve Allah ; and lo! they became two sects quarrelling with each other. So as we can see, that while some members try to falsely assert that the Hebrews ever had a nation, the distorted Bible knockoff, the Quran, they claim to belie ve even testifies to the existence of this nation in ancient times. Of course the distorted Bible knockoff, the Quran, is full of distortions, and h ere is one example, How can little worm eat away Solomans staff? Was Solomon sta nding there for months and waited for the little worm to finish until it fell ap art? Solomon is amused at the speech of an ant? (27:19) How could Solomon keep h is sanity if he heard all the voices of all the insects around him? He must have been drowned in constant chatter. It is high time that all accept the fact that the Quran is nothing but a distorted knockoff of the Bible, and that the Bible truly is the word of the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael. EVEN THE QURAN TESTIFIES THE EXISTANCE OF THE ANCIENT NATION OF THE HEBREWS IN T HE LAND OF PALESTINE: Here this fact is clearly testified to by three different versions/translations of the Quran, as follows: SABA (SABA, SHEBA) 034.012 YUSUFALI: And to Solomon (We made) the Wind (obedient): Its early morning (strid e) was a month's (journey), and its evening (stride) was a month's (journey); an d We made a Font of molten brass to flow for him; and there were Jinns that work ed in front of him, by the leave of his Lord, and if any of them turned aside fr om our command, We made him taste of the Penalty of the Blazing Fire. PICKTHAL: And unto Solomon (We gave) the wind, whereof the morning course was a month's journey and the evening course a month's journey, and We caused the foun t of copper to gush forth for him, and (We gave him) certain of the jinn who wor ked before him by permission of his Lord. And such of them as deviated from Our command, them We caused to taste the punishment of flaming Fire. SHAKIR: And (We made) ourney in the morning n of molten copper to ked before him by the mand from among them, the wind (subservient) to Sulaiman, which made a month's j and a month's journey m the evening, and We made a fountai flow out for him, and of the jinn there were those who wor command of his Lord; and whoever turned aside from Our com We made him taste of the punishment of burning.

034.013 YUSUFALI: They worked for him as he desired, (making) arches, images, basons as large as reservoirs, and (cooking) cauldrons fixed (in their places): "Work ye, sons of David, with thanks! but few of My servants are grateful!" PICKTHAL: They made for him what he willed: synagogues and statues, basins like wells and boilers built into the ground. Give thanks, O House of David! Few of M y bondmen are thankful. SHAKIR: They made for him what he pleased of fortresses and images, and bowls (l arge) as watering-troughs and cooking-pots that will not move from their place; give thanks, O family of Dawood! and very few of My servants are grateful. 034.014 YUSUFALI: Then, when We decreed (Solomon's) death, nothing showed them his death except a little worm of the earth, which kept (slowly) gnawing away at his staf f: so when he fell down, the Jinns saw plainly that if they had known the unseen , they would not have tarried in the humiliating Penalty (of their Task). PICKTHAL: And when We decreed death for him, nothing showed his death to them sa ve a creeping creature of the earth which gnawed away his staff. And when he fel l the jinn saw clearly how, if they had known the Unseen, they would not have co ntinued in despised toil. SHAKIR: But when We decreed death for him, naught showed them his death but a cr eature of the earth that ate away his staff; and when it fell down, the jinn cam e to know plainly that if they had known the unseen, they would not have tarried in abasing torment. And, still more: AL-ANBIYA (THE PROPHETS) 021.081 YUSUFALI: (It was Our power that made) the violent (unruly) wind flow (tamely) f or Solomon, to his order, to the land which We had blessed: for We do know all t hings. PICKTHAL: And unto Solomon (We subdued) the wind in its raging. It set by his co mmand toward the land which We had blessed. And of everything We are Aware. SHAKIR: And (We made subservient) to Sulaiman the wind blowing violent, pursuing its course by his command to the land which We had blessed, and We are knower o f ail things. 021.082 YUSUFALI: And of the evil ones, were some who dived for him, and did other work besides; and it was We Who guarded them. PICKTHAL: And of the evil ones (subdued We unto him) some who dived (for pearls) for him and did other work, and We were warders unto them. SHAKIR: And of the rebellious people there were those who dived for him and did other work besides that, and We kept guard over them; FACTS ON KING SOLOMON MENTIONED OFTEN IN THE QURAN: From an encyclopedia, <<<" Historical-Israel-Dan-Beersheba-Judea.pngUnited Monar chy under Solomon.

Solomon (Latin name) or Shlomo is a figure described in Middle Eastern scripture s as a wise ruler of an empire, living perhaps around 1000 BCE. The names "Shlomo" and "Solomon" are usually associated with the Biblical accoun t of his life. His father lso called ael, prior Kingdom of nealy from was named David (Hebrew). In the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) he is a Jedidiah and described as the third king of the united Kingdom of Isr to the split between the Northern Kingdom of Israel and the Southern Judah. Following the split, the kings of Judah were descended patrili Solomon.

Solomon was the builder of the first Temple in Jerusalem, also known as Solomon' s Temple. He was renowned for his great wisdom, wealth, and power, but also blam ed for his later pacifism toward his converted wives in their worship of other g ods. He is the subject of many later legends. Some Kabbalah masters claim[citati on needed] to be his descendents. The name Solomon (Shlomo) means "peaceful," or "complete", from the Hebrew Shelo moh. The name given by God to Solomon in the Bible is Jedidiah, meaning "friend of God", (2 Samuel 12:25), and some scholars have conjectured that Solomon is a "king name" taken either when he assumed the throne or upon his death. Solomon's case is one of the few in the Bible where the name given by God does n ot stay with the character. Solomon's birth is considered a grace from God, afte r the death of the previous child between David and Bathsheba. Succession Solomon was David's second son by Bathsheba [1], and his declared heir to the th rone. Solomon's history is recorded in 1 Kings 1-11 and 2 Chronicles 1-9. He suc ceeded his father (reigned circa 1011/1010 BCE to 971/970 BCE) on the throne in about 971 or 970 BCE, not 1037 BCE (1 Kings 6:1), according to E. R. Thiele. His father chose him as his successor, passing over the claims of his elder sons, b y women other than Bathsheba. His elevation to the throne took place before his father's death, and is hastened on mainly by Nathan and Bathsheba, in consequenc e of the rebellion of Adonijah. During his long reign of 40 years the Hebrew monarchy gained its highest splendo r. This period has well been called the "Augustan Age" of the Jewish annals. In a single year he collected tribute amounting to 666 talents of gold, according t o 1 Kings 10:14. The first half of his reign was, however, by far the brighter and more prosperou s; the latter half was clouded by the idolatries into which he fell, mainly, acc ording to the scribes, from his intermarriages. According to 1 Kings 11:3, he ha d 700 wives and 300 concubines. As soon as he had settled himself in his kingdom , and arranged the affairs of his extensive empire, he entered into an alliance with Egypt by a marriage with the daughter of the Pharaoh. ... Islamic view of Solomon Main article: Islamic view of Solomon See Similarities between the Bible and the Qur'an Solomon also appears in the Qur'an, where he is called Sulayman, which is Solomo n in Arabic (Sulaiman or Suleiman)(Arabic: ??????). The Qur'an refers to Solomon as the son of David, as a prophet and as a great ruler imparted by God with tre mendous wisdom, favor, and special powers just like his father, David. The Quran states that Solomon had under his rule not only people, but also hosts of hidde n beings (i.e., jinn). It also states that Solomon was able to understand the la nguage of the birds and ants, and to see some of the hidden glory in the world t hat was not accessible to common human beings. The Islamic view on Solomon is ba

sed entirely on revelation's to Muhammed which comprise part of the Qur'an." [so urce - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia]>>. OFF-THE-WALL COMMENTS BY THOSE LACKING KNOWLEDGE OF THE FACTS: Now we shall look at an example by one member of Islam who is either ignorant of reality or pretending to be as he does NOT want to recognize reality, the truth of the matter per John 8:32, "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free" (Authorized King James Bible; AV): "Would the Jews vacate the land if the Moabites, Canaanites, etc. came back to t o the land??? The occupiers are almost all "White Jews" coming from Russia and P oland i.e. of Eastern European Jewry who bought Zionism to the land. Before this the Sephardim Jews used to live side by side by Christian and Arab Moslems. Who gave them the right to "remove" the poor Arab peasants of Palestine from the ir homes??? If Zionists have the right to remove these poor people from homes, t hey definitely have the right to take this land by force - Why wouldn't US helps the Arabs as UN's Resolution No. 242 also calls for the removal of Israelis fro m the is land they are occupying." First, As can clearly be seen, he has failed to show that the Moabites, Canaanit es, etc., ever held title to the land. Reality, they never did, as the first lan d title ever granted, as previously shown, was to Palestine, and this was NOT to any of these, but to the Hebrews, Israelites or Jews as they are commonly known today. Second, He said, "the occupiers are almost all 'White Jews' coming from Russia a nd Poland, i.e., of Eastern European Jewry" which has two misconceptions. First, NO Jews originated in either Eastern Europe or Russia, but the Jews there came there from Palestine and thus like all Jews are part of the Hebrews, Israelites, to whom Almighty God (YHWH), the Creator of all there is gave land title to the ir ancestors in perpetuity. Let's look at the indisputable DNA evidence for this point: <<<" How can you prove that todays European Jews are real Jews - descendants of the original Jews and heirs to the Land of Israel, and not just converts from th e lands in which they lived during the last few centuries? <<"Despite their long-term residence in different countries and isolation from o ne another, most Jewish populations were not significantly different from one an other at the genetic level. The results support the hypothesis that the paternal gene pools of Jewish communities from Europe, North Africa and the Middle East descended from a common Middle Eastern ancestral population, and suggest that mo st Jewish communities have remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jew ish communities during and after the Diaspora." [source - M.F. Hammer, Proc. Nat'l Academy of Science, May 9, 2000]>> In addition to oral tradition and copious historical evidence, the genetic evide nce stands firmly behind the common ancestry of both Ashkenazim and Sephardim in the Near East, and against any non-Jewish origin for either of these groups. Be low are a collection of scientific journal articles including abstracts availabl e worldwide on Pubmed and Medline. Jewish and middle eastern non-jewish populations share a common pool of Y-chromo some biallelic haplotypes. Hammer MF, Redd AJ, Wood ET, Bonner MR, Jarjanazi H, Karafet T, Santachiara-Bene recetti S, Oppenheim A, Jobling MA, Jenkins T, Ostrer H, Bonne-Tamir B

Laboratory of Molecular Systematics and Evolution, University of Arizona, Tucson , AZ 85721; Department of Genetics, Universita degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia 27100 , Italy; Hadassah Medical School, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112 0, Israel. [Medline record in process] Haplotypes constructed from Y-chromosome markers were used to trace the paternal origins of the Jewish Diaspora. A set of 18 biallelic polymorphisms was genotyp ed in 1,371 males from 29 populations, including 7 Jewish (Ashkenazi, Roman, Nor th African, Kurdish, Near Eastern, Yemenite, and Ethiopian) and 16 non-Jewish gr oups from similar geographic locations. The Jewish populations were characterize d by a diverse set of 13 haplotypes that were also present in non-Jewish populat ions from Africa, Asia, and Europe. A series of analyses was performed to addres s whether modern Jewish Y-chromosome diversity derives mainly from a common Midd le Eastern source population or from admixture with neighboring non-Jewish popul ations during and after the Diaspora. Despite their long-term residence in diffe rent countries and isolation from one another, most Jewish populations were not significantly different from one another at the genetic level. Admixture estimat es suggested low levels of European Y-chromosome gene flow into Ashkenazi and Ro man Jewish communities. A multidimensional scaling plot placed six of the seven Jewish populations in a relatively tight cluster that was interspersed with Midd le Eastern non-Jewish populations, including Palestinians and Syrians. Pairwise differentiation tests further indicated that these Jewish and Middle Eastern non -Jewish populations were not statistically different. The results support the hy pothesis that the paternal gene pools of Jewish communities from Europe, North A frica, and the Middle East descended from a common Middle Eastern ancestral popu lation, and suggest that most Jewish communities have remained relatively isolat ed from neighboring non-Jewish communities during and after the Diaspora. PMID: 10801975, UI: 20300976 Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000 Jun 6;97(12):6769-74 ? The common, Near-Eastern origin of Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews supported by Ychromosome similarity. Santachiara Benerecetti AS, Semino O, Passarino G, Torroni A, Brthingya R, Fello us M, Modiano G Dipartimento di Biologia Cellulare, Universita della Calabria, Cosenza, Italy. About 80 Sephardim, 80 Ashkenazim and 100 Czechoslovaks were examined for the Yspecific RFLPs revealed by the probes p12f2 and p49a,f on TaqI DNA digests. The aim of the study was to investigate the origin of the Ashkenazi gene pool throug h the analysis of markers which, having an exclusively holoandric transmission, are useful to estimate paternal gene flow. The comparison of the two groups of J ews with each other and with Czechoslovaks (which have been taken as a represent ative source of foreign Y-chromosomes for Ashkenazim) shows a great similarity b etween Sephardim and Ashkenazim who are very different from Czechoslovaks. On th e other hand both groups of Jews appear to be closely related to Lebanese. A pre liminary evaluation suggests that the contribution of foreign males to the Ashke nazi gene pool has been very low (1% or less per generation). Ann Hum Genet 1993 Jan;57 ( Pt 1):55-64 PMID: 8101437, UI: 93325982" [source - The Peace Encyclopedia]>>>. Second, Then he said, "Who gave them the right to "remove" the poor Arab peasant s of Palestine from their homes?" But this begs the question, who gave these Ara bs the right to wrongly squat of this land to who the Hebrews, Israelites/Jews, were given land title to in perpetuity? Let's look at the facts of how the ances tors and their Caliph's stole this land that rightfully belonged to their brothe

r tribe, the Hebrews, Israelites/Jews. The New Compact Bible Dictionary published by Zondervan Books says this with res pect the site where the squatting Dome of the Rock Mosque sits, <<<"Temple, the name given to complex of buildings in Jerusalem which was the center of the sacr ifical cult for the Hebrews. Three temples stood successively on Mt. Moriah (II Chron. 3:1) in Jerusalem: Solomon's, Zerubbabel's, and Herod the Great's....the Dome of the Rock Mosque which stands on the site of the Temples of Solomon and H erod.">>> so clearly this land belongs to the Hebrews even though it was swiped from them by <<<" Islamic tradition holds that when Muslims first entered the ci ty of Jerusalem under the leadership of Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab (also known a s Umar or Omar) in 637, the ruins of the Temple were being used as a rubbish dum p by the Christian inhabitants, perhaps in order to humiliate the Jews and fulfi ll Jesus' prophecy that not a stone would be left standing on another there; Cal iph Omar (contemporary of Muhammad, who had died a few years earlier), ordered i t cleaned and performed prayer there. According to some sources, he also ordered a mosque to be constructed at the spot, upon which site the Al-Aqsa Mosque was built several decades later." [source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia on Temp le Mount]>>>. However, no where did Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab ever buy the land and/or obtain title from the Hebrews who held rightful title and ownership. The modern government of the Hebrews has been most graceful in permitting the co ntinued squatting of the Al-Aqsa Mosque on property to which they hold title and have not even requested rent from the land so illegally occupied. Now some may question, WRONGLY, the Hebrews ownership, but the restrictions placed on Jews vi siting this area solidify the point beyond doubt as follows, <<<" The Rabbis hav e ruled that Jews may not enter specific areas (approximately 15%) of the Temple Mount [3] because of the danger of entering the area of the Temple courtyard an d the difficulty of fulfilling the ritual requirement of cleansing oneself with the ashes of a red heifer (see Numbers 19), and declared it punishable with kare th, or death by heavenly decree [4]. The boundaries of the areas to be avoided, while having large portions in common, are delineated differently by various rab binic authorities. Many Rabbis have "imposed a blanket ban on access for Jews to the entire Temple Mount"[5], given the uncertainty about the location of the permitted areas, an o pinion still supported by Rabbis such as Ovadia Yosef, Avraham Shapiro, Eliahu B akshi-Doron, and Israel Lau. In August 1967, the Chief Rabbis of Israel, Isser Y ehuda Unterman and Yitzhak Nissim, in concert with other leading rabbis, asserte d that "For generations we have warned against and refrained from entering any p art of the Temple Mount." However, many other rabbis, including Shlomo Goren, former Chief rabbi of Israel , Chaim David Halevi, Dov Lior, Yosef Elboim, Ysrael Ariel, Shar Yeshuv Hacoen a nd Yuval Sharlo have "strongly encouraged" Jews to visit the permitted sections of the Temple Mount. [6]. During Maimonides' residence in Jerusalem, a synagogue stood on the Temple Mount alongside other structures; Maimonides prayed there. The law committee of the Masorti movement (Conservative Judaism in Israel) has i ssued two responsa on the subject, both holding that Jews may visit the permitte d sections of the Temple Mount. One responsa allows such visits, another encoura ges them." [source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia on Temple Mount]>>>. Even Muslim's have acknowledged that the Al-Aqsa Mosque sits on the site of the Temple of Solomon, property of the Hebrew nation as follows, <<<"The main reason that the Temple Mount is holy in Judaism is that it was the site of the Temple. This fact provides a reason for its holiness in Islam; it is still considered t o be the orthodox Islamic position. A Brief Guide to al-Haram al-Sharif, a bookl et published in 1930 by the "Supreme Moslem Council", a body established by the British government to administer waqfs and headed by Hajj Amin al-Husayni during the British Mandate period, states:

"The site is one of the oldest in the world. Its sanctity dates from the earlies t times. Its identity with the site of Solomon's Temple is beyond dispute. This, too, is the spot, according to universal belief, on which David built there an altar unto the Lord, and offered burnt offerings and peace offerings." A footnot e refers the reader to 2 Samuel 26:25. More recent examples include a fatwa issued by the Saudi Sheikh M. S. al-Munajji d, quoted on IslamOnline, 18 March 2001, stating that: Al-Aqsa Mosque (in Jerusa lem) was the first of the two qiblahs (prayer direction), and is one of the thre e mosques to which people may travel for the purpose of worship. And it was said that it was built by Sulayman (Solomon), as stated in Sunan an-Nasa'i and class ed as authentic by al-Albani." [source - - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia on T emple Mount]>>>. So as has been shown, the Arabs took wrongful possession of the Hebrews, Israeli tes/Jews, land by force, WRONGFUL possession and NEVER had rightful title to the land. This begs another question, they have had wrongful possession for centuri es, NOW why do they Not now just peacefully go back where the land stealing ance stors came from and leave the Hebrews, Israelites/Jews, in peace? Third, Now why should any right thinking person question the right of the Hebrew s, Israelites/Jews, to take back possession of THEIR land to which they hold lan d title in perpetuity? The Spanish did this and I do NOT hear (read) anyone having an issue with it; ye t their title was only given to them by a much lesser authority, the Roman gover nment and the fact of title granting was much less recorded - the Hebrews', the Israelite's/Jews', title has been public-ally recorded in every copy of the Tora h since 1,500 BCE so is the most public-ally recorded title in all of human hist ory. Let's look in brief at the Spanish re-conquest of their land from the WRONG LY occupying Arabs: <<<" A Roman emperor had conveyed title to land in Spain to his subjects who wer e in possession in the early part of the common error, but in 711 A.D. much of t his land was stolen from the possessors. Let's look at the historical notes on t his from a Muslim source, www.sunnahonline.com , <<" By 700 CE, with famine in t he Toledo, strife among the aristocracy and chaos throughout the peninsula, the Visigothic kingdom was falling apart. This paved the way for the Muslim invasion of 711, which set Spain's destiny quite apart from the rest of Europe. Following the death of the Prophet (saaw) in 632 CE, the Arabs had spread throug h the Middle East and North Africa, bringing Islam with them. According to myth, they were ushered onto the Iberian Peninsula by the sexual exploits of the last Visigoth king, Roderick. Ballads and chronicles relate how he had seduced the y oung Florinda, daughter of Julian, Visigothic governor of Ceuta in north Africa: and how Julian sought revenge by approaching the Muslims with a plan to invade Spain. In dull fact, Julian probably just wanted help in a struggle for the Visi goth throne. In 711 CE Tariq ibn Ziyad, the governor of Tangiers, landed in Gibraltar with ar ound 10,000 men, mostly Berbers (indigenous North Africans). He had some of Rode rick's Visigoth rivals as allies. In the same or following year in the Cadiz pro vince, Roderick's army was decimated and he is thought to have drowned as he fle d. The Visigothic survivors fled to the north of Spain, and within a few years, the Muslims had taken over the rest of the Iberian Peninsula bar a few areas in the Asturian Mountains bordering France" [source - http://www.sunnahonline.com/i lm/seerah/0075_intro.htm]>>>; These Muslims became possessors of the land of Spain, but they did NOT hold titl

e, and were eventually thrown out and the land returned to those holding legitim ate title with this being concluded around 1492 A.D. A wrongful possession recti fied, this needs to completely happen in the land of Palestine. Fourth, It is also obvious that this one does NOT understand UN Resolution 242 a nd its shortcomings and errors. But first, in brief what is UN Resolution 242? <<<" S/RES/242) was adopted unanimously by the UN Security Council on November 2 2, 1967, in the aftermath of the Six Day War. It was adopted under Chapter VI of the United Nations Charter.[1] The resolution was drafted by British ambassador Lord Caradon and was one of five drafts under consideration.[2] It calls for "the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East w hich should include the application of both the following principles: (i) Withdr awal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict", "(ii) Termination of all claims or states of belligerency" and respect for the r ight of every state in the area to live in peace within secure and recognized bo undaries. It is one of the most commonly referenced UN resolutions in Middle Eas tern politics. Egypt, Jordan, Israel and Lebanon entered into consultations with the UN Special representative over the implementation of 242.[3] Syria denounced the resolutio n in 1967, but "conditionally" accepted it in March 1972, and formally accepted it as part of accepting UN Security Council Resolution 338, the cease-fire at th e end of the Yom Kippur War.[4][ 5] References, 1. ^ UN Transcription of session referring to Chapter VI prior to the introducti on of the Resolution 2. ^ "See S/PV. 1382 Paragraph 65 for list of drafts. The UK draft was designate d S/8247" 3. ^ "See Security Council Document S/10070 Para 2." 4. ^ "Syria's acceptance of 338" 5. ^ Hinnebusch, Raymond A.; Drysdale, Alasdair (1991). Syria and the Middle Eas t Peace Process. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press. pp. 105,108. ISBN 0-87609-105-2. http://books.google.com/books?id=q0J0nJktlWIC&dq=0876091052&outp ut=html. [source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_ Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_242]>>>. And, <<<" The resolution is the formula proposed by the Security Council for the succ essful resolution of the Arab-Israeli conflict, in particular, ending the state of belligerency then existing between Israel and Egypt, Jordan and Syria. It ins ists upon the termination of all states of war in the area; guarantees the sover eignty, territorial integrity and independence of all Middle Eastern nations; an d calls for a "just settlement" of the question of the refugees. ... Broadly speaking, Israel interprets Resolution 242 as calling for withdrawal fro m territories as part of a negotiated peace and full diplomatic recognition. The extent of withdrawal would come as a result of comprehensive negotiations that lead to durable peace. Israel interprets that Resolution 242 does not state that Israel's military must withdraw before peace negotiations begin, nor that Israe l's withdrawal must occur before Arabs start to meet their own obligations of Re solution 242.[7] Israel accepted the resolution; Arab states and the Palestinians rejected it.[1] Initially, most of the Arab world rejected Resolution 242. Today, the general Ar ab position is that the Resolution calls for Israel to withdraw from all the ter ritory it occupied during the Six-Day War as a precondition to the start of peac

e negotiations. But in contrast to the Arab interpretation, so far Israel and all Arab leaders h ave negotiated before Israel withdrew, and there has been Palestinian-Israeli ag reement that small changes will be made to the 1967 border in return for monetar y compensation: Israel and Jordan made peace without Israel withdrawing from the West Bank, which Jordan occupied until 1967. Egypt began negotiations before Is rael withdrew from the Sinai. Negotiations ended without Egypt ever resuming con trol of the Gaza Strip, which Egypt held until 1967; Egypt had requested this be fore the negotiations began.[8] More recently, Palestinian leaders have negotiat ed with Israel before Israel withdrew, and agreed to changes from the 1967 borde rs. The United Nations had never recognized the West Bank as [de jure] Jordanian territory, nor the Gaza Strip as Egyptian territory, and could not enforce thei r claims to sovereignty. Similarly, the Palestinians had never declared statehoo d on any territory when the UN asked them to in 1947. UN Resolution 242 also doe s not make any mention as Palestinian statehood as a necessity, but it has been agreed to by many Israeli leaders in more recent times. Both parties point to the wording of the resolution to back their claims. Supporters of the "Israeli viewpoint" focus on the phrase calling for "secure an d recognized boundaries" and note that the resolution calls for a withdrawal "fr om territories" rather than "from the territories" or "from all territories," as the Arabs and their allies proposed the latter two terms and these were rejecte d from the final draft of Resolution 242.[9] France's ambassador to the UN at th e time, in disagreement with the Palestinian viewpoint, stated that the correct interpretation is that the word "the" is not added to the text he wrote, and not ed before as well as after the vote, that the French position is that Israel doe s not need to withdraw from all occupied territories.[10] References: 6. ^ http://www.un.org/documents/sc/res/1967/scres67.htm 7. ^ http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Foreign%20Rela....nse-%208%20Febr 8. ^ http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Foreign%20Rela....nse-%208%20Febr 9. ^ http://books.google.com/books?id=bVddOoQ....&resnum=1&ct=re sult#PPA153,M1 Sydney Dawson Bailey, The Making of Resolution 242 10. ^ http://books.google.com/books?id=bVddOoQ....&resnum=1&ct=re sult#PPA152,M1 [source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_ Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_242]>>>. Now of course this resolution fails to deal with the central issue; to wit, the Hebrews, Israelites/Jews, hold land title in perpetuity to ALL the land of Pales tine. The UN was simply trying to find a way of ending the conflict, NOT establi sh TRUE justice a political solution, NOT a just legal solution. Also, Resolution 242 failed to deal with the illegal taxes on the Hebrews who we re on their own land by the conquering Caliphs and arrange for its return with r easonable rate of interest by Islam. And the Palestinens never formed a state nor accepted Resolution 242 so in reali ty they have NO rights under Resolution 242, which of course is null and void as it did not cover who held land title; a condition legally prerequisite in legal ly establishing land ownership. Also, it fails to define who the occupiers are/w ere. History clearly shows the occupiers to be the Arabs, Palestines; and the He brews, Israelites/Jews, to be the ones reconquesting the land from the WRONGFUL occupiers. Fifth, Now all of this begs another question. Wars should be eliminated and at present one religion is responsible for over 90

% of the violence on earth as pointed out by an Australian newspaper as follows: "Did you know that 90-95% of the conflicts in the world today are Muslims fighti ng non-muslims or each other? " [source - The Weekend Australian, November 26-27 , 2005 AD]" So the question is: Why are the Arabs, Ishmaelites, so greedy? They have over 98% of the Middle East, but still greedly want the less than 2% belonging to their sister tribe Israel] - its time we get real and put an end to this so the world can stop experiencin g continuous Ishmaelite induced strife such as shooting rockets at Israel; viole nce in Mumbai, England, France, Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan, USA, Canada, Thaila nd, Indonesia, China, Germany, and elsewhere. CONCLUSION: [1] The Hebrews, Israelites/Jews, hold legitimate title in perpetuity to all of Palestine, and were granted title by the highest authority in the entire univers e, Almighty God (YHWH) Creator of all there is. [2] The Ishmaelites stole the land from its rightful owners and illegally occupi ed it just as they did for many centuries in Spain it is now time for its rightf ul owners to repossess it. [3] Members of Islam are responsible for over 90% of the violence in the world. [4] The Ishmaelites NEVER accepted Resolution 242 strictly a political document.

[2] Some Do NOT Understand The Difference Between Title and Occupancy INTRODUCTION: Some do not understand the difference between title and occupancy. Let's look at what these both are: TITLE - is a legal term for a bundle of rights in a piece of property in which a party may own either a legal interest or an equitable interest[1] The rights in the bundle may be separated and held by different parties. It may also refer to a formal document that serves as evidence of ownership. Conveyance of the docum ent may be required in order to transfer ownership in the property to another pe rson. Title is distinct from possession, a right that often accompanies ownershi p but is not necessarily sufficient to prove it. In many cases, both possession and title may be transferred independently of each other. POSSESSION - is the actual holding of a thing, whether or not one has any right to do so. The right of possession is the legitimacy of possession (with or witho ut actual possession), the evidence for which is such that the law will uphold i t unless a better claim is proven. The right of property is that right which, if all relevant facts were known (and allowed), would defeat all other claims. Eac h of these may be in a different person. For example, suppose A steals from B, what B had previously bought in good faith from C, which C had earlier stolen from D, which had been an heirloom of D's fa mily for generations, but had originally been stolen centuries earlier (though t his fact is now forgotten by all) from E. Here A has the possession, B has an ap parent right of possession (as evidenced by the purchase), D has the absolute ri ght of possession (being the best claim that can be proven), and the heirs of E, if they knew it, have the right of property, which they cannot prove. Good titl e consists in uniting these three (possession, right of possession, and right of

property) in the same person(s). Now, if the financed automobile referenced above was purchased by a company and was being loaned out by a car rental organization, the person who rented the veh icle would have possession; the rental company would be the registered owner and have right of possession, while again, the lienholder would have right of prope rty. [reference - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki /Title_(property)]. Now TITLE must be publically anounced. In ancient times this was done by publica tion on scrools, stone slabs, and other writing means after the first ever assig nment of title example recorded in the Book of Numbers, 34 th. Chapter, in the T orah, now the first five parts of the the inspired word of Almighty God (YHWH), the Bible, by Moses, the choosen prophet Moses (Mosche) as follows: Numbers 34 th Chapter, "And Jehovah spake unto Moses, saying, 2 Command the children of Israel, and say unto them, When ye come into the land of Canaan (this is the land that shall fall unto you for an inheritance, even th e land of Canaan according to the borders thereof), 3 then your south quarter shall be from the wilderness of Zin along by the side of Edom, and your south border shall be from the end of the Salt Sea eastward; 4 and your border shall turn about southward of the ascent of Akrabbim, and pass along to Zin; and the goings out thereof shall be southward of Kadesh-barnea; a nd it shall go forth to Hazar-addar, and pass along to Azmon; 5 and the border shall turn about from Azmon unto the brook of Egypt, and the go ings out thereof shall be at the sea. 6 And for the western border, ye shall have the great sea and the border thereof : this shall be your west border. 7 And this shall be your north border: from the great sea ye shall mark out for you mount Hor; 8 from mount Hor ye shall mark out unto the entrance of Hamath; and the goings o ut of the border shall be at Zedad; 9 and the border shall go forth to Ziphron, and the goings out thereof shall be at Hazar-enan: this shall be your north border. 10 And ye shall mark out your east border from Hazar-enan to Shepham; 11 and the border shall go down from Shepham to Riblah, on the east side of Ain; and the border shall go down, and shall reach unto the side of the sea of Chinn ereth eastward; 12 and the border shall go down to the Jordan, and the goings out thereof shall be at the Salt Sea. This shall be your land according to the borders thereof rou nd about. 13 And Moses commanded the children of Israel, saying, This is the land which ye shall inherit by lot, which Jehovah hath commanded to give unto the nine tribes , and to the half-tribe; 14 for the tribe of the children of Reuben according to their fathers' houses, a nd the tribe of the children of Gad according to their fathers' houses, have rec eived, and the half-tribe of Manasseh have received, their inheritance: 15 the two tribes and the half-tribe have received their inheritance beyond the Jordan at Jericho eastward, toward the sunrising. 16 And Jehovah spake unto Moses, saying, 17 These are the names of the men that shall divide the land unto you for inheri tance: Eleazar the priest, and Joshua the son of Nun. 18 And ye shall take one prince of every tribe, to divide the land for inheritan ce. 19 And these are the names of the men: Of the tribe of Judah, Caleb the son of J ephunneh. 20 And of the tribe of the children of Simeon, Shemuel the son of Ammihud. 21 Of the tribe of Benjamin, Elidad the son of Chislon. 22 And of the tribe of the children of Dan a prince, Bukki the son of Jogli. 23 Of the children of Joseph: of the tribe of the children of Manasseh a prince,

Hanniel the son of Ephod. 24 And of the tribe of the children of Ephraim a prince, Kemuel the son of Shiph tan. 25 And of the tribe of the children of Zebulun a prince, Elizaphan the son of Pa rnach. 26 And of the tribe of the children of Issachar a prince, Paltiel the son of Azz an. 27 And of the tribe of the children of Asher a prince, Ahihud the son of Shelomi . 28 And of the tribe of the children of Naphtali a prince, Pedahel the son of Amm ihud. 29 These are they whom Jehovah commanded to divide the inheritance unto the chil dren of Israel in the land of Canaan." (American Standard Version; ASV). This constituted the first ever granting of real title to land in the chronologi cal course of human history, and this by the highest possible authority, Almight y God (YHWH), the Creator of all there is who has the absolute right to give wha t he wants to whom he wants. This brings up the interesting fact that one can have possession without having a valid title to land. A good example is that of nomadic tribes in the middle ea st and elsewhere such as the Berbers and the New World Indians, they had possess ion, but not title to the land they roamed. [Special note - in the early 1800's some New World Indians were granted title in the form of a titled reservation.] The first granting of title occurred around 1,500 B.C. when the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael gave land title to the ancient Hebrews, nation of Israel, to perpetuity. Before that no one had title, but only possession of lan d; to wit, that was the beginning of land titlement. And this was by the highest possible authority of all, the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael, the highest authority in the universe so his absolu te right to grant title to whom he pleased is of course beyond challenge. Also, the soundness of title depends on several factors or conditions precedent: First, the higher the position of the granter the more legitimate the title is w ith the highest granter being, of course, the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael, the supreme being. This followed by E mperors, Kings or Caliphs, and Presidents or Sultans in that order. REAL LIFE EXAMPLE OF POSESSION STOLEN IN WARFARE: A Roman emperor had conveyed title to land in Spain to his subjects who were in possession in the early part of the common error, but in 711 A.D. much of this l and was stolen from the possessors. Let's look at the historical notes on this f rom a Muslim source, www.sunnahonline.com , <<<" By 700 CE, with famine in the T oledo, strife among the aristocracy and chaos throughout the peninsula, the Visi gothic kingdom was falling apart. This paved the way for the Muslim invasion of 711, which set Spain's destiny quite apart from the rest of Europe. Following the death of the Prophet (saaw) in 632 CE, the Arabs had spread throug h the Middle East and North Africa, bringing Islam with them. According to myth, they were ushered onto the Iberian Peninsula by the sexual exploits of the last Visigoth king, Roderick. Ballads and chronicles relate how he had seduced the y oung Florinda, daughter of Julian, Visigothic governor of Ceuta in north Africa: and how Julian sought revenge by approaching the Muslims with a plan to invade Spain. In dull fact, Julian probably just wanted help in a struggle for the Visi goth throne. In 711 CE Tariq ibn Ziyad, the governor of Tangiers, landed in Gibraltar with ar ound 10,000 men, mostly Berbers (indigenous North Africans). He had some of Rode

rick's Visigoth rivals as allies. In the same or following year in the Cadiz pro vince, Roderick's army was decimated and he is thought to have drowned as he fle d. The Visigothic survivors fled to the north of Spain, and within a few years, the Muslims had taken over the rest of the Iberian Peninsula bar a few areas in the Asturian Mountains bordering France" [source - http://www.sunnahonline.com/i lm/seerah/0075_intro.htm]>>>; these Muslims became possessors of the land of Spa in, but they did NOT hold title, and were eventually thrown out and the land ret urned to those holding legitimate title with this being concluded around 1492 A. D. A wrongful possession rectified. This same wrongful situation occurred elsewhere with possession being gained onc e more in warfare and violence, now let's look at another example from a Muslim source, www.sunnahonline.com/ilm/seerah/ , <<<" In April 1453, the Turks laid si ege to Constantinople. Despite the heavy Turkish bombardment of the walls, the i nhabitants of the city were able to repair the fortifications every night. The B yzantines were exhausted but took solace in the old legend that Constantinople w ould never fall while the Moon was waxing. Then, on the night of 22 May, the Moo n rose in eclipse and their morale was crushed. Mohammed knew of the legend and waited a few days before starting a fresh attack . During the battle a small gate was left open by accident but it was all the Tu rks needed. The sack of Constantinople lasted three days, as the Moon waned." [s ource - http://www.sunnahonline.com/ilm/seerah/]>>>; <<<"unfortunately the legit imate title holders have not regained rightful possession to their legitimate pr operty as yet from those holding possession by force of arms. Yet the property a nd title really belongs to the Byzantines who centuries earlier had been given t itle by a Roman Emperor" [Note, earlier title granting takes precedence over lat er title granting.].[source - Possession is NOT The Same As Title to Land: at, [ http://religioustruths.proboards59.com/ind...read=1164667454 ]>>> The distorted Bible knockoff, the Quran, gives abundant testimony to the existen ce to the ancient kingdom of the Hebrews that has recently come out of a long hi atus. This will now be shown from three different versions of the Quran that tes tify to this kingdom under King Solomon and a visit by the Queen of Sheba. AN-NAML (THE ANT, THE ANTS), Sura 27: 027.020 YUSUFALI: And he took a muster of the Birds; and he said: "Why is it I see not t he Hoopoe? Or is he among the absentees? PICKTHAL: And he sought among the birds and said: How is it that I see not the h oopoe, or is he among the absent? SHAKIR: And he reviewed the birds, then said: How is it I see not the hoopoe or is it that he is of the absentees? 027.021 YUSUFALI: "I will certainly punish him with a severe penalty, or execute him, un less he bring me a clear reason (for absence)." PICKTHAL: I verily will punish him with hard punishment or I verily will slay hi m, or he verily shall bring me a plain excuse. SHAKIR: I will most certainly punish him with a severe punishment, or kill him, or he shall bring to me a clear plea. 027.022 YUSUFALI: But the Hoopoe tarried not far: he (came up and) said: "I have compass ed (territory) which thou hast not compassed, and I have come to thee from Saba with tidings true.

PICKTHAL: But he was not long in coming, and he said: I have found out (a thing) that thou apprehendest not, and I come unto thee from Sheba with sure tidings. SHAKIR: And he tarried not long, then said: I comprehend that which you do not c omprehend and I have brought to you a sure information from Sheba. 027.023 YUSUFALI: "I found (there) a woman ruling over them and provided with every requ isite; and she has a magnificent throne. PICKTHAL: Lo! I found a woman ruling over them, and she hath been given (abundan ce) of all things, and hers is a mighty throne. SHAKIR: Surely I found a woman ruling over them, and she has been given abundanc e and she has a mighty throne: 027.024 YUSUFALI: "I found her and her people worshipping the sun besides Allah: Satan h as made their deeds seem pleasing in their eyes, and has kept them away from the Path,- so they receive no guidance,PICKTHAL: I found her and her people worshipping the sun instead of Allah; and S atan maketh their works fairseeming unto them, and debarreth them from the way ( of Truth), so that they go not aright; SHAKIR: I found her and her people adoring the sun instead of Allah, and the Sha itan has made their deeds fair-seeming to them and thus turned them from the way , so they do not go aright 027.025 YUSUFALI: "(Kept them away from the Path), that they should not worship Allah, W ho brings to light what is hidden in the heavens and the earth, and knows what y e hide and what ye reveal. PICKTHAL: So that they worship not Allah, Who bringeth forth the hidden in the h eavens and the earth, and knoweth what ye hide and what ye proclaim, SHAKIR: That they do not make obeisance to Allah, Who brings forth what is hidde n in the heavens and the earth and knows what you hide and what you make manifes t: 027.026 YUSUFALI: "Allah!- there is no god but He!- Lord of the Throne Supreme!" PICKTHAL: Allah; there is no Allah save Him, the Lord of the Tremendous Throne. SHAKIR: Allah, there is no god but He: He is the Lord of mighty power. 027.027 YUSUFALI: (Solomon) said: "Soon shall we see whether thou hast told the truth or lied! PICKTHAL: (Solomon) said: We shall see whether thou speakest truth or whether th ou art of the liars. SHAKIR: He said: We will see whether you have told the truth or whether you are of the liars: 027.028

YUSUFALI: "Go thou, with this letter of mine, and deliver it to them: then draw back from them, and (wait to) see what answer they return"... PICKTHAL: Go with this my letter and throw it down unto them; then turn away and see what (answer) they return, SHAKIR: Take this my letter and hand it over to them, then turn away from them a nd see what (answer) they return. 027.029 YUSUFALI: (The queen) said: "Ye chiefs! here is delivered to me - a letter worth y of respect. PICKTHAL: (The Queen of Sheba) said (when she received the letter): O chieftains ! Lo! there hath been thrown unto me a noble letter. SHAKIR: She said: O chief! surely an honorable letter has been delivered to me 027.030 YUSUFALI: "It is from Solomon, and is (as follows): 'In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful: PICKTHAL: Lo! it is from Solomon, and lo! it is: In the name of Allah, the Benef icent, the Merciful; SHAKIR: Surely it is from Sulaiman, and surely it is in the name of Allah, the B eneficent, the Merciful; 027.031 YUSUFALI: "'Be ye not arrogant against me, but come to me in submission (to the true Religion).'" PICKTHAL: Exalt not yourselves against me, but come unto me as those who surrend er. SHAKIR: Saying: exalt not yourselves against me and come to me in submission. 027.032 YUSUFALI: She said: "Ye chiefs! advise me in (this) my affair: no affair have I decided except in your presence." PICKTHAL: She said: O chieftains! Pronounce for me in my case. I decide no case till ye are present with me. SHAKIR: She said: O chiefs! give me advice respecting my affair: I never decide an affair until you are in my presence. 027.033 YUSUFALI: They said: "We are endued with strength, and given to vehement war: bu t the command is with thee; so consider what thou wilt command." PICKTHAL: They said: We are lords of might and lords of great prowess, but it is for thee to command; so consider what thou wilt command. SHAKIR: They said: We are possessors of strength and possessors of mighty prowes s, and the command is yours, therefore see what you will command. 027.034 YUSUFALI: She said: "Kings, when they enter a country, despoil it, and make the noblest of its people its meanest thus do they behave.

PICKTHAL: She said: Lo! kings, when they enter a township, ruin it and make the honour of its people shame. Thus will they do. SHAKIR: She said: Surely the kings, when they enter a town, ruin it and make the noblest of its people to be low, and thus they (always) do; 027.035 YUSUFALI: "But I am going to send him a present, and (wait) to see with what (an swer) return (my) ambassadors." PICKTHAL: But lo! I am going to send a present unto them, and to see with what ( answer) the messengers return. SHAKIR: And surely I am going to send a present to them, and shall wait to see w hat (answer) do the messengers bring back. 027.036 YUSUFALI: Now when (the embassy) came to Solomon, he said: "Will ye give me abun dance in wealth? But that which Allah has given me is better than that which He has given you! Nay it is ye who rejoice in your gift! PICKTHAL: So when (the envoy) came unto Solomon, (the King) said: What! Would ye help me with wealth? But that which Allah hath given me is better than that whi ch He hath given you. Nay it is ye (and not I) who exult in your gift. SHAKIR: So when he came to Sulaiman, he said: What! will you help me with wealth ? But what Allah has given me is better than what He has given you. Nay, you are exultant because of your present; 027.037 YUSUFALI: "Go back to them, and be sure we shall come to them with such hosts as they will never be able to meet: We shall expel them from there in disgrace, an d they will feel humbled (indeed)." PICKTHAL: Return unto them. We verily shall come unto them with hosts that they cannot resist, and we shall drive them out from thence with shame, and they will be abased. SHAKIR: Go back to them, so we will most certainly come to them with hosts which they shall have no power to oppose, and we will most certainly expel them there from in abasement, and they shall be in a state of ignominy. 027.038 YUSUFALI: He said (to his own men): "Ye chiefs! which of you can bring me her th rone before they come to me in submission?" PICKTHAL: He said: O chiefs! Which of you will bring me her throne before they c ome unto me, surrendering? SHAKIR: He said: O chiefs! which of you can bring to me her throne before they c ome to me in submission? 027.039 YUSUFALI: Said an 'Ifrit, of the Jinns: "I will bring it to thee before thou ris e from thy council: indeed I have full strength for the purpose, and may be trus ted." PICKTHAL: A stalwart of the jinn said: I will bring it thee before thou canst ri se from thy place. Lo! I verily am strong and trusty for such work.

SHAKIR: One audacious among the jinn said: I will bring it to you before you ris e up from your place; and most surely I am strong (and) trusty for it. 027.040 YUSUFALI: Said one who had knowledge of the Book: "I will bring it to thee withi n the twinkling of an eye!" Then when (Solomon) saw it placed firmly before him, he said: "This is by the Grace of my Lord!- to test me whether I am grateful or ungrateful! and if any is grateful, truly his gratitude is (a gain) for his own soul; but if any is ungrateful, truly my Lord is Free of all Needs, Supreme in Honour !" PICKTHAL: One with whom was knowledge of the Scripture said: I will bring it the e before thy gaze returneth unto thee. And when he saw it set in his presence, ( Solomon) said: This is of the bounty of my Lord, that He may try me whether I gi ve thanks or am ungrateful. Whosoever giveth thanks he only giveth thanks for (t he good of) his own soul; and whosoever is ungrateful (is ungrateful only to his own soul's hurt). For lo! my Lord is Absolute in independence, Bountiful. SHAKIR: One who had the knowledge of the Book said: I will bring it to you in th e twinkling of an eye. Then when he saw it settled beside him, he said: This is of the grace of my Lord that He may try me whether I am grateful or ungrateful; and whoever is grateful, he is grateful only for his own soul, and whoever is un grateful, then surely my Lord is Self-sufficient, Honored. 027.041 YUSUFALI: He said: "Transform her throne out of all recognition by her: let us s ee whether she is guided (to the truth) or is one of those who receive no guidan ce." PICKTHAL: He said: Disguise her throne for her that we may see whether she will go aright or be of those not rightly guided. SHAKIR: He said: Alter her throne for her, we will see whether she follows the r ight way or is of those who do not go aright. 027.042 YUSUFALI: So when she arrived, she was asked, "Is this thy throne?" She said, "I t was just like this; and knowledge was bestowed on us in advance of this, and w e have submitted to Allah (in Islam)." PICKTHAL: So, when she came, it was said (unto her): Is thy throne like this? Sh e said: (It is) as though it were the very one. And (Solomon said): We were give n the knowledge before her and we had surrendered (to Allah). SHAKIR: So when she came, it was said: Is your throne like this? She said: It is as it were the same, and we were given the knowledge before it, and we were sub missive. 027.043 YUSUFALI: And he diverted her from the worship of others besides Allah: for she was (sprung) of a people that had no faith. PICKTHAL: And (all) that she was wont to worship instead of Allah hindered her, for she came of disbelieving folk. SHAKIR: And what she worshipped besides Allah prevented her, surely she was of a n unbelieving people. 027.044

YUSUFALI: She was asked to enter the lofty Palace: but when she saw it, she thou ght it was a lake of water, and she (tucked up her skirts), uncovering her legs. He said: "This is but a palace paved smooth with slabs of glass." She said: "O my Lord! I have indeed wronged my soul: I do (now) submit (in Islam), with Solom on, to the Lord of the Worlds." PICKTHAL: It was said unto her: Enter the hall. And when she saw it she deemed i t a pool and bared her legs. (Solomon) said: Lo! it is a hall, made smooth, of g lass. She said: My Lord! Lo! I have wronged myself, and I surrender with Solomon unto Allah, the Lord of the Worlds. SHAKIR: It was said to her: Enter the palace; but when she saw it she deemed it to be a great expanse of water, and bared her legs. He said: Surely it is a pala ce made smooth with glass. She said: My Lord! surely I have been unjust to mysel f, and I submit with Sulaiman to Allah, the Lord of the worlds. 027.045 YUSUFALI: We sent (aforetime), to the Thamud, their brother Salih, saying, "Serv e Allah": But behold, they became two factions quarrelling with each other. PICKTHAL: And We verily sent unto Thamud their brother Salih, saying: Worship Al lah. And lo! they (then became two parties quarrelling. SHAKIR: And certainly We sent to Samood their brother Salih, saying: Serve Allah ; and lo! they became two sects quarrelling with each other. So as we can see, that while some members try to falsely assert that the Hebrews ever had a nation, the distorted Bible knockoff, the Quran, they claim to belie ve even testifies to the existence of this nation in ancient times. Of course the distorted Bible knockoff, the Quran, is full of distortions, and h ere is one example, How can little worm eat away Solomans staff? Was Solomon sta nding there for months and waited for the little worm to finish until it fell ap art? Solomon is amused at the speech of an ant? (27:19) How could Solomon keep h is sanity if he heard all the voices of all the insects around him? He must have been drowned in constant chatter. It is high time that all accept the fact that the Quran is nothing but a distorted knockoff of the Bible, and that the Bible truly is the word of the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael. EVEN THE QURAN TESTIFIES THE EXISTANCE OF THE ANCIENT NATION OF THE HEBREWS IN T HE LAND OF PALESTINE: Here this fact is clearly testified to by three different versions/translations of the Quran, as follows: SABA (SABA, SHEBA) 034.012 YUSUFALI: And to Solomon (We made) the Wind (obedient): Its early morning (strid e) was a month's (journey), and its evening (stride) was a month's (journey); an d We made a Font of molten brass to flow for him; and there were Jinns that work ed in front of him, by the leave of his Lord, and if any of them turned aside fr om our command, We made him taste of the Penalty of the Blazing Fire. PICKTHAL: And unto Solomon (We gave) the wind, whereof the morning course was a month's journey and the evening course a month's journey, and We caused the foun t of copper to gush forth for him, and (We gave him) certain of the jinn who wor ked before him by permission of his Lord. And such of them as deviated from Our command, them We caused to taste the punishment of flaming Fire.

SHAKIR: And (We made) ourney in the morning n of molten copper to ked before him by the mand from among them,

the wind (subservient) to Sulaiman, which made a month's j and a month's journey m the evening, and We made a fountai flow out for him, and of the jinn there were those who wor command of his Lord; and whoever turned aside from Our com We made him taste of the punishment of burning.

034.013 YUSUFALI: They worked for him as he desired, (making) arches, images, basons as large as reservoirs, and (cooking) cauldrons fixed (in their places): "Work ye, sons of David, with thanks! but few of My servants are grateful!" PICKTHAL: They made for him what he willed: synagogues and statues, basins like wells and boilers built into the ground. Give thanks, O House of David! Few of M y bondmen are thankful. SHAKIR: They made for him what he pleased of fortresses and images, and bowls (l arge) as watering-troughs and cooking-pots that will not move from their place; give thanks, O family of Dawood! and very few of My servants are grateful. 034.014 YUSUFALI: Then, when We decreed (Solomon's) death, nothing showed them his death except a little worm of the earth, which kept (slowly) gnawing away at his staf f: so when he fell down, the Jinns saw plainly that if they had known the unseen , they would not have tarried in the humiliating Penalty (of their Task). PICKTHAL: And when We decreed death for him, nothing showed his death to them sa ve a creeping creature of the earth which gnawed away his staff. And when he fel l the jinn saw clearly how, if they had known the Unseen, they would not have co ntinued in despised toil. SHAKIR: But when We decreed death for him, naught showed them his death but a cr eature of the earth that ate away his staff; and when it fell down, the jinn cam e to know plainly that if they had known the unseen, they would not have tarried in abasing torment. And, still more: AL-ANBIYA (THE PROPHETS) 021.081 YUSUFALI: (It was Our power that made) the violent (unruly) wind flow (tamely) f or Solomon, to his order, to the land which We had blessed: for We do know all t hings. PICKTHAL: And unto Solomon (We subdued) the wind in its raging. It set by his co mmand toward the land which We had blessed. And of everything We are Aware. SHAKIR: And (We made subservient) to Sulaiman the wind blowing violent, pursuing its course by his command to the land which We had blessed, and We are knower o f ail things. 021.082 YUSUFALI: And of the evil ones, were some who dived for him, and did other work besides; and it was We Who guarded them. PICKTHAL: And of the evil ones (subdued We unto him) some who dived (for pearls) for him and did other work, and We were warders unto them. SHAKIR: And of the rebellious people there were those who dived for him and did other work besides that, and We kept guard over them;

FACTS ON KING SOLOMON MENTIONED OFTEN IN THE QURAN: From an encyclopedia, <<<" Historical-Israel-Dan-Beersheba-Judea.pngUnited Monar chy under Solomon. Solomon (Latin name) or Shlomo is a figure described in Middle Eastern scripture s as a wise ruler of an empire, living perhaps around 1000 BCE. The names "Shlomo" and "Solomon" are usually associated with the Biblical accoun t of his life. His father lso called ael, prior Kingdom of nealy from was named David (Hebrew). In the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) he is a Jedidiah and described as the third king of the united Kingdom of Isr to the split between the Northern Kingdom of Israel and the Southern Judah. Following the split, the kings of Judah were descended patrili Solomon.

Solomon was the builder of the first Temple in Jerusalem, also known as Solomon' s Temple. He was renowned for his great wisdom, wealth, and power, but also blam ed for his later pacifism toward his converted wives in their worship of other g ods. He is the subject of many later legends. Some Kabbalah masters claim[citati on needed] to be his descendents. The name Solomon (Shlomo) means "peaceful," or "complete", from the Hebrew Shelo moh. The name given by God to Solomon in the Bible is Jedidiah, meaning "friend of God", (2 Samuel 12:25), and some scholars have conjectured that Solomon is a "king name" taken either when he assumed the throne or upon his death. Solomon's case is one of the few in the Bible where the name given by God does n ot stay with the character. Solomon's birth is considered a grace from God, afte r the death of the previous child between David and Bathsheba. Succession Solomon was David's second son by Bathsheba [1], and his declared heir to the th rone. Solomon's history is recorded in 1 Kings 1-11 and 2 Chronicles 1-9. He suc ceeded his father (reigned circa 1011/1010 BCE to 971/970 BCE) on the throne in about 971 or 970 BCE, not 1037 BCE (1 Kings 6:1), according to E. R. Thiele. His father chose him as his successor, passing over the claims of his elder sons, b y women other than Bathsheba. His elevation to the throne took place before his father's death, and is hastened on mainly by Nathan and Bathsheba, in consequenc e of the rebellion of Adonijah. During his long reign of 40 years the Hebrew monarchy gained its highest splendo r. This period has well been called the "Augustan Age" of the Jewish annals. In a single year he collected tribute amounting to 666 talents of gold, according t o 1 Kings 10:14. The first half of his reign was, however, by far the brighter and more prosperou s; the latter half was clouded by the idolatries into which he fell, mainly, acc ording to the scribes, from his intermarriages. According to 1 Kings 11:3, he ha d 700 wives and 300 concubines. As soon as he had settled himself in his kingdom , and arranged the affairs of his extensive empire, he entered into an alliance with Egypt by a marriage with the daughter of the Pharaoh. ... Islamic view of Solomon Main article: Islamic view of Solomon See Similarities between the Bible and the Qur'an Solomon also appears in the Qur'an, where he is called Sulayman, which is Solomo n in Arabic (Sulaiman or Suleiman)(Arabic: ???). The Qur'an refers to Solomon as the son of David, as a prophet and as a great ruler imparted by God with tremen

dous wisdom, favor, and special powers just like his father, David. The Quran st ates that Solomon had under his rule not only people, but also hosts of hidden b eings (i.e., jinn). It also states that Solomon was able to understand the langu age of the birds and ants, and to see some of the hidden glory in the world that was not accessible to common human beings. The Islamic view on Solomon is based entirely on revelation's to Muhammed which comprise part of the Qur'an." [sourc e - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia]>>. OFF-THE-WALL COMMENTS BY THOSE LACKING KNOWLEDGE OF THE FACTS: Now we shall look at an example by one member of Islam who is either ignorant of reality or pretending to be as he does NOT want to recognize reality, the truth of the matter per John 8:32, "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free" (Authorized King James Bible; AV): "Would the Jews vacate the land if the Moabites, Canaanites, nutstities cmes bac k to to the land??? The occupiers are almost all "White Jews" coming from Russia and Poland i.e. of Eastern European Jewry who bought Zionism to the land. Befor e this the Sephardim Jews used to live side by side by Christian and Arab Moslem s. Who gave them the right to "remove" the poor Arab peasants of Palestine from the ir homes??? If Zionists have the right to remove these poor people from homes, t hey definitely have the right to take this land by force - Why wouldn't US helps the Arabs as UN's Resolution No. 242 also calls for the removal of Israelis fro m the is land they are occupying." First, As can clearly be seen, he has failed to show that the Moabites, Canaanit es, nutstities [whoever they are], ever held title to the land. Reality, they ne ver did, as the first land title ever granted, as previously shown, was to Pales tine, and this was NOT to any of these, but to the Hebrews, Israelites or Jews a s they are commonly known today. Second, He said, "the occupiers are almost all 'White Jews' coming from Russia a nd Poland, i.e., of Eastern European Jewry" which has two misconceptions. First, NO Jews originated in either Eastern Europe or Russia, but the Jews there came there from Palestine and thus like all Jews are part of the Hebrews, Israelites, to whom Almighty God (YHWH), the Creator of all there is gave land title to the ir ancestors in perpetuity. Let's look at the indisputable DNA evidence for this point: <<<" How can you prove that todays European Jews are real Jews - descendants of the original Jews and heirs to the Land of Israel, and not just converts from th e lands in which they lived during the last few centuries? "Despite their long-term residence in different countries and isolation from one another, most Jewish populations were not significantly different from one anot her at the genetic level. The results support the hypothesis that the paternal g ene pools of Jewish communities from Europe, North Africa and the Middle East de scended from a common Middle Eastern ancestral population, and suggest that most Jewish communities have remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jewis h communities during and after the Diaspora." - M.F. Hammer, Proc. Nat'l Academy of Science, May 9, 2000 In addition to oral tradition and copious historical evidence, the genetic evide nce stands firmly behind the common ancestry of both Ashkenazim and Sephardim in the Near East, and against any non-Jewish origin for either of these groups. Be low are a collection of scientific journal articles including abstracts availabl e worldwide on Pubmed and Medline.

Jewish and middle eastern non-jewish populations share a common pool of Y-chromo some biallelic haplotypes. Hammer MF, Redd AJ, Wood ET, Bonner MR, Jarjanazi H, Karafet T, Santachiara-Bene recetti S, Oppenheim A, Jobling MA, Jenkins T, Ostrer H, Bonne-Tamir B Laboratory of Molecular Systematics and Evolution, University of Arizona, Tucson , AZ 85721; Department of Genetics, Universita degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia 27100 , Italy; Hadassah Medical School, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112 0, Israel. [Medline record in process] Haplotypes constructed from Y-chromosome markers were used to trace the paternal origins of the Jewish Diaspora. A set of 18 biallelic polymorphisms was genotyp ed in 1,371 males from 29 populations, including 7 Jewish (Ashkenazi, Roman, Nor th African, Kurdish, Near Eastern, Yemenite, and Ethiopian) and 16 non-Jewish gr oups from similar geographic locations. The Jewish populations were characterize d by a diverse set of 13 haplotypes that were also present in non-Jewish populat ions from Africa, Asia, and Europe. A series of analyses was performed to addres s whether modern Jewish Y-chromosome diversity derives mainly from a common Midd le Eastern source population or from admixture with neighboring non-Jewish popul ations during and after the Diaspora. Despite their long-term residence in diffe rent countries and isolation from one another, most Jewish populations were not significantly different from one another at the genetic level. Admixture estimat es suggested low levels of European Y-chromosome gene flow into Ashkenazi and Ro man Jewish communities. A multidimensional scaling plot placed six of the seven Jewish populations in a relatively tight cluster that was interspersed with Midd le Eastern non-Jewish populations, including Palestinians and Syrians. Pairwise differentiation tests further indicated that these Jewish and Middle Eastern non -Jewish populations were not statistically different. The results support the hy pothesis that the paternal gene pools of Jewish communities from Europe, North A frica, and the Middle East descended from a common Middle Eastern ancestral popu lation, and suggest that most Jewish communities have remained relatively isolat ed from neighboring non-Jewish communities during and after the Diaspora. PMID: 10801975, UI: 20300976 Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000 Jun 6;97(12):6769-74 ? The common, Near-Eastern origin of Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews supported by Ychromosome similarity. Santachiara Benerecetti AS, Semino O, Passarino G, Torroni A, Brthingya R, Fello us M, Modiano G Dipartimento di Biologia Cellulare, Universita della Calabria, Cosenza, Italy. About 80 Sephardim, 80 Ashkenazim and 100 Czechoslovaks were examined for the Yspecific RFLPs revealed by the probes p12f2 and p49a,f on TaqI DNA digests. The aim of the study was to investigate the origin of the Ashkenazi gene pool throug h the analysis of markers which, having an exclusively holoandric transmission, are useful to estimate paternal gene flow. The comparison of the two groups of J ews with each other and with Czechoslovaks (which have been taken as a represent ative source of foreign Y-chromosomes for Ashkenazim) shows a great similarity b etween Sephardim and Ashkenazim who are very different from Czechoslovaks. On th e other hand both groups of Jews appear to be closely related to Lebanese. A pre liminary evaluation suggests that the contribution of foreign males to the Ashke nazi gene pool has been very low (1% or less per generation). Ann Hum Genet 1993 Jan;57 ( Pt 1):55-64 PMID: 8101437, UI: 93325982" [source - The Peace Encyclopedia]>>>.

Second, Then he said, "Who gave them the right to "remove" the poor Arab peasant s of Palestine from their homes?" But this begs the question, who gave these Ara bs the right to wrongly squat of this land to who the Hebrews, Israelites/Jews, were given land title to in perpetuity? Let's look at the facts of how the ances tors and their Caliph's stole this land that rightfully belonged to their brothe r tribe, the Hebrews, Israelites/Jews. The New Compact Bible Dictionary published by Zondervan Books says this with res pect the site where the squatting Dome of the Rock Mosque sits, <<<"Temple, the name given to complex of buildings in Jerusalem which was the center of the sacr ifical cult for the Hebrews. Three temples stood successively on Mt. Moriah (II Chron. 3:1) in Jerusalem: Solomon's, Zerubbabel's, and Herod the Great's....the Dome of the Rock Mosque which stands on the site of the Temples of Solomon and H erod.">>> so clearly this land belongs to the Hebrews even though it was swiped from them by <<<" Islamic tradition holds that when Muslims first entered the ci ty of Jerusalem under the leadership of Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab (also known a s Umar or Omar) in 637, the ruins of the Temple were being used as a rubbish dum p by the Christian inhabitants, perhaps in order to humiliate the Jews and fulfi ll Jesus' prophecy that not a stone would be left standing on another there; Cal iph Omar (contemporary of Muhammad, who had died a few years earlier), ordered i t cleaned and performed prayer there. According to some sources, he also ordered a mosque to be constructed at the spot, upon which site the Al-Aqsa Mosque was built several decades later." [source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia on Temp le Mount]>>>. However, no where did Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab ever buy the land and/or obtain title from the Hebrews who held rightful title and ownership. The modern government of the Hebrews has been most graceful in permitting the co ntinued squatting of the Al-Aqsa Mosque on property to which they hold title and have not even requested rent from the land so illegally occupied. Now some may question, WRONGLY, the Hebrews ownership, but the restrictions placed on Jews vi siting this area solidify the point beyond doubt as follows, <<<" The Rabbis hav e ruled that Jews may not enter specific areas (approximately 15%) of the Temple Mount [3] because of the danger of entering the area of the Temple courtyard an d the difficulty of fulfilling the ritual requirement of cleansing oneself with the ashes of a red heifer (see Numbers 19), and declared it punishable with kare th, or death by heavenly decree [4]. The boundaries of the areas to be avoided, while having large portions in common, are delineated differently by various rab binic authorities. Many Rabbis have "imposed a blanket ban on access for Jews to the entire Temple Mount"[5], given the uncertainty about the location of the permitted areas, an o pinion still supported by Rabbis such as Ovadia Yosef, Avraham Shapiro, Eliahu B akshi-Doron, and Israel Lau. In August 1967, the Chief Rabbis of Israel, Isser Y ehuda Unterman and Yitzhak Nissim, in concert with other leading rabbis, asserte d that "For generations we have warned against and refrained from entering any p art of the Temple Mount." However, many other rabbis, including Shlomo Goren, former Chief rabbi of Israel , Chaim David Halevi, Dov Lior, Yosef Elboim, Ysrael Ariel, Shar Yeshuv Hacoen a nd Yuval Sharlo have "strongly encouraged" Jews to visit the permitted sections of the Temple Mount. [6]. During Maimonides' residence in Jerusalem, a synagogue stood on the Temple Mount alongside other structures; Maimonides prayed there. The law committee of the Masorti movement (Conservative Judaism in Israel) has i ssued two responsa on the subject, both holding that Jews may visit the permitte d sections of the Temple Mount. One responsa allows such visits, another encoura ges them." [source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia on Temple Mount]>>>. Even Muslim's have acknowledged that the Al-Aqsa Mosque sits on the site of the Temple of Solomon, property of the Hebrew nation as follows, <<<"The main reason

that the Temple Mount is holy in Judaism is that it was the site of the Temple. This fact provides a reason for its holiness in Islam; it is still considered t o be the orthodox Islamic position. A Brief Guide to al-Haram al-Sharif, a bookl et published in 1930 by the "Supreme Moslem Council", a body established by the British government to administer waqfs and headed by Hajj Amin al-Husayni during the British Mandate period, states: "The site is one of the oldest in the world. Its sanctity dates from the earlies t times. Its identity with the site of Solomon's Temple is beyond dispute. This, too, is the spot, according to universal belief, on which David built there an altar unto the Lord, and offered burnt offerings and peace offerings." A footnot e refers the reader to 2 Samuel 26:25. More recent examples include a fatwa issued by the Saudi Sheikh M. S. al-Munajji d, quoted on IslamOnline, 18 March 2001, stating that: Al-Aqsa Mosque (in Jerusa lem) was the first of the two qiblahs (prayer direction), and is one of the thre e mosques to which people may travel for the purpose of worship. And it was said that it was built by Sulayman (Solomon), as stated in Sunan an-Nasa'i and class ed as authentic by al-Albani." [source - - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia on T emple Mount]>>>. So as has been shown, the Arabs took wrongful possession of the Hebrews, Israeli tes/Jews, land by force, WRONGFUL possession and NEVER had rightful title to the land. This begs another question, they have had wrongful possession for centuri es, NOW why do they Not now just peacefully go back where the land stealing ance stors came from and leave the Hebrews, Israelites/Jews, in peace? Third, Now why should any right thinking person question the right of the Hebrew s, Israelites/Jews, to take back possession of THEIR land to which they hold lan d title in perpetuity? The Spanish did this and I do NOT hear (read) anyone having an issue with it; ye t their title was only given to them by a much lesser authority, the Roman gover nment and the fact of title granting was much less recorded - the Hebrews', the Israelite's/Jews', title has been public-ally recorded in every copy of the Tora h since 1,500 BCE so is the most public-ally recorded title in all of human hist ory. Let's look in brief at the Spanish re-conquest of their land from the WRONG LY occupying Arabs: <<<" A Roman emperor had conveyed title to land in Spain to his subjects who wer e in possession in the early part of the common error, but in 711 A.D. much of t his land was stolen from the possessors. Let's look at the historical notes on t his from a Muslim source, www.sunnahonline.com , <<" By 700 CE, with famine in t he Toledo, strife among the aristocracy and chaos throughout the peninsula, the Visigothic kingdom was falling apart. This paved the way for the Muslim invasion of 711, which set Spain's destiny quite apart from the rest of Europe. Following the death of the Prophet (saaw) in 632 CE, the Arabs had spread throug h the Middle East and North Africa, bringing Islam with them. According to myth, they were ushered onto the Iberian Peninsula by the sexual exploits of the last Visigoth king, Roderick. Ballads and chronicles relate how he had seduced the y oung Florinda, daughter of Julian, Visigothic governor of Ceuta in north Africa: and how Julian sought revenge by approaching the Muslims with a plan to invade Spain. In dull fact, Julian probably just wanted help in a struggle for the Visi goth throne. In 711 CE Tariq ibn Ziyad, the governor of Tangiers, landed in Gibraltar with ar ound 10,000 men, mostly Berbers (indigenous North Africans). He had some of Rode rick's Visigoth rivals as allies. In the same or following year in the Cadiz pro vince, Roderick's army was decimated and he is thought to have drowned as he fle

d. The Visigothic survivors fled to the north of Spain, and within a few years, the Muslims had taken over the rest of the Iberian Peninsula bar a few areas in the Asturian Mountains bordering France" [source - http://www.sunnahonline.com/i lm/seerah/0075_intro.htm]>>>; these Muslims became possessors of the land of Spa in, but they did NOT hold title, and were eventually thrown out and the land ret urned to those holding legitimate title with this being concluded around 1492 A. D. A wrongful possession rectified, this needs to completely happen in the land of Palestine. Fourth, It is also obvious that this one does NOT understand UN Resolution 242 a nd its shortcomings and errors. But first, in brief what is UN Resolution 242? <<<" S/RES/242) was adopted unanimously by the UN Security Council on November 2 2, 1967, in the aftermath of the Six Day War. It was adopted under Chapter VI of the United Nations Charter.[1] The resolution was drafted by British ambassador Lord Caradon and was one of five drafts under consideration.[2] It calls for "the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East w hich should include the application of both the following principles: (i) Withdr awal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict", "(ii) Termination of all claims or states of belligerency" and respect for the r ight of every state in the area to live in peace within secure and recognized bo undaries. It is one of the most commonly referenced UN resolutions in Middle Eas tern politics. Egypt, Jordan, Israel and Lebanon entered into consultations with the UN Special representative over the implementation of 242.[3] Syria denounced the resolutio n in 1967, but "conditionally" accepted it in March 1972, and formally accepted it as part of accepting UN Security Council Resolution 338, the cease-fire at th e end of the Yom Kippur War.[4][ 5] References, 1. ^ UN Transcription of session referring to Chapter VI prior to the introducti on of the Resolution 2. ^ "See S/PV. 1382 Paragraph 65 for list of drafts. The UK draft was designate d S/8247" 3. ^ "See Security Council Document S/10070 Para 2." [3] Land Theft Of Seventh Century Responsible For Middle East Problems of Today: INTRODUCTION: Many do not realize that a Seventh Century theft of land my members of Islam is totally responsible for all the problems in Palestine and the surrounding areas today. This theft of land by conquest by members of Islam under the direction of Caliph Umar ibn al Khattab the successor to Caliph Abu Bakr who directed his righ t hand pillager Abu Ubaidah ibn al-Jarrah. They captured Jerusalem in 638 AD. After that they and other Muslim leaders (Cal iphs) after them began moving in their followers from Arab lands onto the land w rongly occupied by them. At this time they now had wrongful posession, but not l egitimate title to the land of Palestine as this, title, was held by the Hebrews , Jews, since approximately 1,500 BC. when it was given to them by Almighty God (YHWH), Creator of all there is, the superme authority in the entire universe, a nd this grant of title is recorded at Numbers chapter 34 making it the most publ ically recorded granting of title in all human history with over six (6) billion copies existing until today. Of course, the Muslims always like to cast themselves as victims, but reality is they are the greatest wrongful occupiers of land in all human history. But note how they scream about the simple policing action in Iraq as an occupation, and

the Hebrews, Jews, retaking of some of their own land as an occupation utter lie s to cover up their own wrong occupations. Fact is, the USA and other nations wa nt out of Iraq as quickly as possible but have not been able to get out due to t he love of some members of Islam for violence such as human bombs, suicide bombe rs, etc. But of course the fact, the reality, is that if the members of Islam had NOT wro ngly occupied Palestine in the first place there would simply be no Palestine is sue today. MIDDLE EAST REALITY IN THE 7 TH. CENTURY: As the History of Movement of People, said, << One of the most dramatic and sudden movements of any people in history is the expansion, by conquest, of the Arabs i n the 7th century (only the example of the Mongols in the 13th century can match it). The desert tribesmen of Arabia form the bulk of the Muslim armies. Their n atural ferocity and love of warfare, together with the sense of moral rectitude provided by their new religion, form an irresistible combination. When Muhammad dies in 632, the western half of Arabia is Muslim. Two years later the entire peninsula has been brought to the faith, and Muslim armies have move d up into the desert between Syria and Mesopotamia.

The great Christian cities of Syria and Palestine fall to the Arabs in rapid suc cession from AD 635. Damascus, in that year, is the first to be captured. Antioc h follows in 636. And 638 brings the greatest prize of all, in Muslim terms, whe n Jerusalem is taken after a year's siege. [source History World, HISTORY OF THE MOVEMENT OF PEOPLES, retrieved from http://www.historyworld.net/wrldhis/Plai.... &HistoryID=ab18 on 5/15/2009]>> And this reality is confirmed as follows, << The Arab conquests: 7th century AD, Umar continued the war of conquests begun by Abu Bakr. He pressed into the Sassa nid Persian Empire itself, but he also headed north into Syria and Byzantine ter ritory and west into Egypt. These were some of the richest regions in the world guarded by powerful states, but a lengthy war between the Byzantines and Sassani ds had left both states militarily exhausted. Islamic forces easily prevailed in war against the two states. By 640, Islamic military campaigns had brought all of Mesopotamia, Syria and Palestine under the control of Rashidun Caliphate. Egy pt was conquered by 642 and the entire Persian Empire by 643 On 22 August 634, Caliph Abu Bakr died, making Umar his successor. As Umar becam e caliph, he relieved Khalid from commanding the Islamic armies and appointed Ab u Ubaidah ibn al-Jarrah as the new commander of Muslim army, the conquest of Syr ia slow down under him and Abu-Ubaida relied heavily on the advice of Khalid, an d he kept beside him as much as possible. [9] The last large garrison of Byzantine army was at Fahl, which was joined by survi vors of Ajnadayn. With this threat at their rear Muslim armies could not more no rth or south, Thus Abu Ubaidah decided to deal with it, this garrison defeated a nd routed at Battle of Fahl on 23rd of January 635. This battle proved to be the Key to palestine. .[source retrieved from, Ra shidun Caliphate, From Wikipedia, t he free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashidun_Caliphate on 5/15/200 9]>> An interesting book, The Rock: A Tale of Seventh-Century Jerusalem (Hardcover), b y Kanan Makiya (Author) gives even more insight on this. And the Historical Tour of Jerusalem says, << The Arab Period (638-1099), The Arabs conquered Jerusalem around 638 C.E. The city retained its Roman name, Aelia, until the tenth century, when it was changed to the Arabic al-Quds (the H oly). At the time of its capture, Jerusalem was a sacred city for all three Abra hamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam). When the Arab armies took Jerus alem in 638, they occupied a center whose shrines had made it a major pilgrimage

site in Christendom. The empire of the Umayyads, stretched over vast areas from the borders of France to the borders of India. However, after the Umayyads were replaced by the Abbasids, the steady decline of Jerusalem began. Damascus was t he Umayyad Empire s capital until the Abbasids moved the capital to Baghdad. The p roximity of the capital to Jerusalem was one of the reasons that Damascus caliph s paid special attention to the city. However, the move to Baghdad distanced the concerns of the Abbasid caliphs.(1) [source - The Muslim Period, from A HISTORICAL TOUR OF JERUSALEM, retrieved from http://www1.american.edu/TED/hpages/jeruselum/ muslim.htm on 5/13/2009]>> << On 22 August 634, Caliph Abu Bakr died, making Umar his successor. As Umar beca me caliph, he relieved Khalid from commanding the Islamic armies and appointed A bu Ubaidah ibn al-Jarrah as the new commander of Muslim army, the conquest of Sy ria slow down under him and Abu-Ubaida relied heavily on the advice of Khalid, a nd he kept beside him as much as possible. [9] The last large garrison of Byzantine army was at Fahl, which was joined by survi vors of Ajnadayn. With this threat at their rear Muslim armies could not more no rth or south, Thus Abu Ubaidah decided to deal with it, this garrison defeated a nd routed at Battle of Fahl on 23rd of January 635. This battle proved to be the Key to palestine. .[source - Ra shidun Caliphate, retrieved from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashidun_Caliphate on 5/15/2009 ]>> << The Arab Period (638-1099)The Arabs conquered Jerusalem around 638 C.E. The cit y retained its Roman name, Aelia, until the tenth century, when it was changed t o the Arabic al-Quds (the Holy). At the time of its capture, Jerusalem was a sac red city for all three Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam). When the Arab armies took Jerusalem in 638, they occupied a center whose shrines had made it a major pilgrimage site in Christendom. The empire of the Umayyads, str etched over vast areas from the borders of France to the borders of India. Howev er, after the Umayyads were replaced by the Abbasids, the steady decline of Jeru salem began. Damascus was the Umayyad Empire s capital until the Abbasids moved th e capital to Baghdad. The proximity of the capital to Jerusalem was one of the r easons that Damascus caliphs paid special attention to the city. However, the mo ve to Baghdad distanced the concerns of the Abbasid caliphs.(1) [source - The Musl im Period, from A HISTORICAL TOUR OF JERUSALEM, http://www1.american.edu/TED/hpage s/jeruselum/muslim.htm ]>> So as can readily be seen the REAL WRONGFUL OCCUPIERS in Palestine are the membe rs of Islam whose ancestors stole the land in the Seventh Century. HISTORY OF THE HEBREWS IN JERUSALEM FOR OVER 3,000 YEARS: For over 3,000 years, since Almighty God (YHWH), the Creator of all there is gav e them title to Palestine, the Hebrews, Jews, have always maintained a presence in the land. One historical account says this with respect this fact, << HISTORY Jewish Continuity in Jerusalem Throughout history, the Jewish People has maintained a presence in Jerusalem, ev er since King David established the city as his capital nearly 3,000 years ago. Except for a very few periods, when they were forcibly barred from living in the city by foreign conquerors, Jews have always lived in Jerusalem. It is for this reason that Jews regard the city as their national center. Indeed, it is the ce ntrality of the connection with Jerusalem -- Zion -- which led the modern Jewish movement for national liberation to be called Zionism. Throughout millennia, an d in the face of conquest, forced exile, violence and discrimination, Jews have maintained their direct link to Jerusalem, returning to live in their city again and again. The Jewish national and religious tie to Jerusalem was first established by King David and Solomon, his son, who built the first Temple there. This First Common wealth lasted over 400 years, until the Babylonians conquered Jerusalem and exil ed the Jewish inhabitants of the city. Immediately following the Persian defeat of the Babylonians, the Jews returned to Jerusalem less than 100 years later, re built their Temple and reestablished the Jewish character of the city. For the next 500 years, the Jews further strengthened their presence in Jerusale

m, surviving various attempts by foreign empires to destroy their national and r eligious identity. Greeks, Seleucids and Romans took turns in conquering the cit y, forbidding Jewish religious practices and encouraging the Jews to assimilate into the dominant culture. Several times, the Jews were forced to take up arms i n order to preserve their liberty and heritage. Only after the Second Temple was destroyed by Rome in 70 AD, and a subsequent Je wish revolt was crushed in 135 AD, was the Jewish presence in the city temporari ly suspended, following the killing or enslavement of the Jewish population by t he Romans. By the 4th century, some Jews had managed to make their way back to the city. In the 5th century, under early Christian rule, Jews were, at various times, eithe r more or less free to practice their religion. At this time, few non-Christian communities remained in the country, apart from the Jews. Theodosius II (408-450 ) deprived the Jews of their relative autonomy and their right to hold public po sitions. Jewish courts were forbidden to sit on mixed Jewish-Christian cases and the construction of new synagogues was prohibited. Jews were forbidden to enter Jerusalem except on one day a year, to mourn the destruction of the Temple. At the beginning of the 7th century, the Jews looked to the Persians for salvati on. Hoping to be permitted to worship freely once the Byzantine oppression had b een removed, the Jews encouraged the Persians' conquest of Acre and Jerusalem, a nd a Jewish community was subsequently allowed to settle and worship in Jerusale m (614-17), though it was later expelled. Under early Arab rule, a Jewish commun ity was reestablished in Jerusalem and flourished in the 8th century. Jews were even among those who guarded the walls of the Dome of the Rock. In return, they were absolved from paying the poll-tax imposed on all non-Muslims. In the 10th a nd 11th centuries, however, harsh measures were imposed against the Jews by the Fatimids, who seized power in 969. Though the Jewish academy (Yeshiva) of Jerusa lem was compelled by Caliph Al-Hakim to reestablish itself in Ramle, entry to Je rusalem was revived by the "Mourners of Zion", Diaspora Jews who did not cease t o lament the destruction of the Temple. This movement, which held that "aliyah" -- ascent to the Land -- would hasten the resurrection of Israel, was at its pea k in the 9th-11th centuries. Many Jews came from Byzantium and Iraq and establis hed communities. The Biblical Era While various origins have been proposed for its Semitic name, Yerushalem -- oft en translated as "the city of Shalem" -- the Bible recounts in Genesis that Abra ham visited King Malchizedek of Shalem, which the commentators equate with Jerus alem. Interestingly, "shalem" is also related grammatically to "shalom," or peac e; thus the city's appellation: "City of Peace." The Hebrew root "shalem" also m eans "wholeness." The first archeological evidence of Jerusalem's history dates back to the Early Bronze Age (c. 3000 BC). When David was anointed King of Israel (c. 1000 BC), and subsequently united the tribes of Israel, he captured the city -- which he perceived as an ideal site f or the capital of his new kingdom. Then, with the King and the Ark of the Covena nt in residence in the city, Jerusalem was transformed into both the political c apital and the religious center of Israel. King David's son and successor, Solom on, consolidated Jerusalem's eternal religious significance for all Jews by buil ding the First Temple. [source - HISTORY OF JERUSALEM, retrieved from, http://www .shalomjerusalem.com/jerusalem/jerusalem3b.htm on 4/30/2009]>> And this is also testified to as follows, << The city has a history that goes back to the 4th millennium BCE, making it one of the oldest cities in the world. Jer usalem has been the holiest city in Judaism and the spiritual center of the Jewi sh people since the 10th century BCE, contains a number of significant ancient C hristian sites, and is considered the third-holiest city in Islam. Despite havin g an area of only 0.9 square kilometer (0.35 square mile),[source wapedia Wiki: Jerusalem, retrieved from http://wapedia.mobi/en/jerusalem on 5/14/2009]>> And, << HISTORY Jewish Continuity in Jerusalem Throughout history, the Jewish People h as maintained a presence in Jerusalem, ever since King David established the cit y as his capital nearly 3,000 years ago. Except for a very few periods, when the

y were forcibly barred from living in the city by foreign conquerors, Jews have always lived in Jerusalem. It is for this reason that Jews regard the city as th eir national center. Indeed, it is the centrality of the connection with Jerusal em -- Zion -- which led the modern Jewish movement for national liberation to be called Zionism. Throughout millennia, and in the face of conquest, forced exile , violence and discrimination, Jews have maintained their direct link to Jerusal em, returning to live in their city again and again. [source retrieved from, http: //www.netanyahu.org/jerusalem1.html on 4/21/2009] And the following books and a few other sources weigh in on this presence as fol lows: << Jerusalem has been the holiest city in Judaism and the spiritual center of the Jewish people since the 10th century BCE [source reference - "Timeline for the Hi story of Jerusalem". Jewish Virtual Library. American-Israeli Cooperative Enterp rise. http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Peace/jerutime.html. Retrieved on 2007-04-16.]>> <<"Israel was first forged into a unified nation from Jerusalem some 3,000 years ago, when King David seized the crown and united the twelve tribes from this ci ty... For a thousand years Jerusalem was the seat of Jewish sovereignty, the hou sehold site of kings, the location of its legislative councils and courts. In ex ile, the Jewish nation came to be identified with the city that had been the sit e of its ancient capital. Jews, wherever they were, prayed for its restoration." [source - Roger Friedland, Richard D. Hecht. To Rule Jerusalem, University of C alifornia Press, 2000, p. 8. ISBN 0-520-22092-7 ]>> <<"The Jewish bond to Jerusalem was never broken. For three millennia, Jerusalem has been the center of the Jewish faith, retaining its symbolic value throughou t the generations."[source - Jerusalem- the Holy City, Israeli Ministry of Forei gn Affairs, February 23, 2003. Accessed March 24, 2007]>> <<"The centrality of Jerusalem to Judaism is so strong that even secular Jews ex press their devotion and attachment to the city and cannot conceive of a modern State of Israel without it... For Jews Jerusalem is sacred simply because it exi sts... Though Jerusalem's sacred character goes back three millennia...".[source - Leslie J. Hoppe. The Holy City: Jerusalem in the theology of the Old Testamen t, Liturgical Press, 2000, p. 6. ISBN 0-8146-5081-3]>> <<"Ever since King David made Jerusalem the capital of Israel 3,000 years ago, t he city has played a central role in Jewish existence."[source - Mitchell Geoffr ey Bard, The Complete Idiot's Guide to the Middle East Conflict, Alpha Books, 20 02, p. 330. ISBN 0-02-864410-7]>> <<"For Jews the city has been the pre-eminent focus of their spiritual, cultural , and national life throughout three millennia." [source - Yossi Feintuch, U.S. Policy on Jerusalem, Greenwood Publishing Group, 1987, p. 1. ISBN 0-313-25700-0] >> <<"Jerusalem became the center of the Jewish people some 3,000 years ago"[source - Moshe Maoz, Sari Nusseibeh, Jerusalem: Points of Friction - And Beyond, Brill Academic Publishers, 2000, p. 1. ISBN 90-411-8843-6] >> <<"The Jewish people are inextricably bound to the city of Jerusalem. No other c ity has played such a dominant role in the history, politics, culture, religion, national life and consciousness of a people as has Jerusalem in the life of Jew ry and Judaism. Since King David established the city as the capital of the Jewi sh state circa 1000 BCE, it has served as the symbol and most profound expressio n of the Jewish people's identity as a nation."[source - Basic Facts you should know: Jerusalem, Anti-Defamation League, 2007. Retrieved March 28, 2007]>> << the Jews since King David proclaimed it his capital in the 10th century BCE. Jer usalem was the site of Solomon's Temple and the Second Temple. It is mentioned i n the Bible 632 times. Today, the Western Wall, a remnant of the wall surroundin g the Second Temple, is a Jewish holy site second only to the Holy of Holies on the Temple Mount itself. Synagogues around the world are traditionally built wit h the Holy Ark facing Jerusalem, and Arks within Jerusalem face the "Holy of Hol ies". As prescribed in the Mishna and codified in the Shulchan Aruch, daily pray ers are recited while facing towards Jerusalem and the Temple Mount. Many Jews h ave "Mizrach" plaques hung on a wall of their homes to indicate the direction of

prayer. [source Jerusalem, From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wiki pedia.org/wiki/Jerusalem ]>> So as can readily be seen, only the Hebrews, Jews, have a legitimate claim to th e land of Palestine. THE CRUSADES WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEM: Members of Islam accuse the Catholic Church of starting the Crusades, but this i s just one BIG LIE. Let s look at the facts, the reality. Now let's look at the fa cts of the First Crusade from history and see how the greed and war like ways of Islam brought it on. << In 1009 the Fatimid caliph al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah had sacked the pilgrimage hosp ice in Jerusalem and destroyed the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. It was later re built by the Byzantine emperor, but this event may have been remembered in Europ e and may have helped spark the crusade. In 1063, Pope Alexander II had given pa pal blessing to Iberian Christians in their wars against the Muslims, granting b oth a papal standard (the vexillum sancti Petri) and an indulgence to those who were killed in battle. Pleas from the Byzantine Emperors, now threatened under b y the Seljuks, first in 1074 from Emperor Michael VII to Pope Gregory VII and in 1095 from Emperor Alexius I Comnenus to Pope Urban II, thus fell on ready ears. .. This background in the Christian West must be matched with that in the Muslim Ea st. Muslim presence in the Holy Land goes back to the initial Arab conquest of P alestine in the 7th century. This did not interfere much with pilgrimage to Chri stian holy sites or the security of monasteries and Christian communities in the Holy Land of Christendom, and western Europeans were not much concerned with th e loss of far-away Jerusalem when, in the ensuing decades and centuries, they we re themselves faced with invasions by Muslims and other hostile non-Christians s uch as the Vikings and Magyars. However, the Muslim armies' successes were putti ng strong pressure on the Eastern Orthodox Byzantine Empire. A turning point in western attitudes towards the east came in the year 1009, whe n the Fatimid caliph of Cairo, al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah, had the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem destroyed. His successor permitted the Byzantine Empire to rebuild it under stringent circumstances, and pilgrimage was again permitted, but many stories began to be circulated in the West about the cruelty of Muslim s toward Christian pilgrims; these stories then played an important role in the development of the crusades later in the century. The immediate cause of the First Crusade was Alexius I's appeal to Pope Urban II for mercenaries to help him resist Muslim advances into territory of the Byzant ine Empire. In 1071, at the Battle of Manzikert, the Byzantine Empire had been d efeated, and this defeat led to the loss of all but the coastlands of Asia Minor (modern Turkey). Although the East-West Schism was brewing between the Catholic Western church and the Greek Orthodox Eastern church, Alexius I expected some h elp from a fellow Christian. However, the response was much larger, and less hel pful, than Alexius I desired, as the Pope called for a large invasion force to n ot merely defend the Byzantine Empire but also retake Jerusalem. When the First Crusade was preached in 1095, the Christian princes of northern I beria had been fighting their way out of the mountains of Galicia and Asturias, the Basque Country and Navarre, with increasing success, for about a hundred yea rs. The fall of Moorish Toledo to the Kingdom of Len in 1085 was a major victory, but the turning points of the Reconquista still lay in the future. The disunity of the Muslim emirs was an essential factor, and the Christians, whose wives re mained safely behind, were hard to beat: they knew nothing except fighting, they had no gardens or libraries to defend, and they worked their way forward throug h alien territory populated by infidels, where the Christian fighters felt they could afford to wreak havoc. All these factors were soon to be replayed in the f ighting grounds of the East. Spanish historians have traditionally seen the Reco

nquista as the molding force in the Castilian character, with its sense that the highest good was to die fighting for the Christian cause of one's country. While the Reconquista was the most prominent example of Christian war against Mu slim conquests, it is not the only such example. The Norman adventurer Robert Gu iscard had conquered the "toe of Italy," Calabria, in 1057 and was holding what had traditionally been Byzantine territory against the Muslims of Sicily. The ma ritime states of Pisa, Genoa and Catalonia were all actively fighting Islamic st rongholds in Majorca and Sardinia, freeing the coasts of Italy and Catalonia fro m Muslim raids. Much earlier, of course, the Christian homelands of Syria, Leban on, Palestine, Egypt, and so on had been conquered by Muslim armies. This long h istory of losing territories to a religious enemy, as well as a powerful pincer movement on all of Western Europe, created a powerful motive to respond to Byzan tine emperor Alexius I's call for holy war to defend Christendom, and to recaptu re the lost lands, starting at the most important one of all, Jerusalem itself." >> [source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia][source - Religion of Peace That L oves War: by Iris the Preacher]>>. In fact, most Crusades were NOT conducted by the Catholic Church but by members of Islam. A time line of Muslim Crusades from 635 to 973 and their theft of land s by conquest and subsequent wrongful occupation of these lands until this day f ollow: 634 644 The Caliphate of Umar ibn al Khattab, who is regarded as particularly brutal . 635 Muslim Crusaders besiege and conquer of Damascus 636 Muslim Crusaders defeat Byzantines decisively at Battle of Yarmuk. 637 Muslim Crusaders conquer Iraq at the Battle of al Qadisiyyah (some date it in 635 or 636) 638 Muslim Crusaders conquer and annex Jerusalem, taking it from the Byzantines. 638 650 Muslim Crusaders conquer Iran, except along Caspian Sea. 639 642 Muslim Crusaders conquer Egypt. 641 Muslim Crusaders control Syria and Palestine. 643 707 Muslim Crusaders conquer North Africa. 644 Caliph Umar is assassinated by a Persian prisoner of war; Uthman ibn Affan i s elected third Caliph, who is regarded by many Muslims as gentler than Umar. 644 650 Muslim Crusaders conquer Cyprus, Tripoli in North Africa, and establish Is lamic rule in Iran, Afghanistan, and Sind. 656 Caliph Uthman is assassinated by disgruntled Muslim soldiers; Ali ibn Abi Ta lib, son in law and cousin to Muhammad, who married the prophet's daughter Fatima th rough his first wife Khadija, is set up as Caliph. 656 Battle of the Camel, in which Aisha, Muhammad's wife, leads a rebellion agai nst Ali for not avenging Uthman's assassination. Ali's partisans win. 657 Battle of Siffin between Ali and Muslim governor of Jerusalem, arbitration g oes against Ali 661 Murder of Ali by an extremist; Ali's supporters acclaim his son Hasan as nex t Caliph, but he comes to an agreement with Muawiyyah I and retires to Medina. 661 680 the Caliphate of Muawiyyah I. He founds Umayyid dynasty and moves capital from Medina to Damascus 673 678 Arabs besiege Constantinople, capital of Byzantine Empire 680 Massacre of Hussein (Muhammad's grandson), his family, and his supporters in Karbala, Iraq. 691 Dome of the Rock is completed in Jerusalem, only six decades after Muhammad' s death. 705 Abd al Malik restores Umayyad rule. 710 713 Muslim Crusaders conquer the lower Indus Valley. 711 713 Muslim Crusaders conquer Spain and impose the kingdom of Andalus. This art icle recounts how Muslims today still grieve over their expulsion 700 years late r. They seem to believe that the land belonged to them in the first place. 719 Cordova, Spain, becomes seat of Arab governor 732 The Muslim Crusaders stopped at the Battle of Poitiers; that is, Franks (Fra

nce) halt Arab advance 749 The Abbasids conquer Kufah and overthrow Umayyids 756 Foundation of Umayyid amirate in Cordova, Spain, setting up an independent k ingdom from Abbasids 762 Foundation of Baghdad 785 Foundation of the Great Mosque of Cordova 789 Rise of Idrisid amirs (Muslim Crusaders) in Morocco; foundation of Fez; Chri stoforos, a Muslim who converted to Christianity, is executed. 800 Autonomous Aghlabid dynasty (Muslim Crusaders) in Tunisia 807 Caliph Harun al Rashid orders the destruction of non Muslim prayer houses and of the church of Mary Magdalene in Jerusalem 809 Aghlabids (Muslim Crusaders) conquer Sardinia, Italy 813 Christians in Palestine are attacked; many flee the country 831 Muslim Crusaders capture Palermo, Italy; raids in Southern Italy 850 Caliph al Matawakkil orders the destruction of non Muslim houses of prayer 855 Revolt of the Christians of Hims (Syria) 837 901 Aghlabids (Muslim Crusaders) conquer Sicily, raid Corsica, Italy, France 869 883 Revolt of black slaves in Iraq 909 Rise of the Fatimid Caliphate in Tunisia; these Muslim Crusaders occupy Sici ly, Sardinia 928 969 Byzantine military revival, they retake old territories, such as Cyprus (9 64) and Tarsus (969) 937 The Ikhshid, a particularly harsh Muslim ruler, writes to Emperor Romanus, b oasting of his control over the holy places 937 The Church of the Resurrection (known as Church of Holy Sepulcher in Latin W est) is burned down by Muslims; more churches in Jerusalem are attacked 960 Conversion of Qarakhanid Turks to Islam 966 Anti Christian riots in Jerusalem 969 Fatimids (Muslim Crusaders) conquer Egypt and found Cairo c. 970 Seljuks enter conquered Islamic territories from the East 973 Israel and southern Syria are again conquered by the Fatimids [source American Thinker, May 15, 2009, retrieved from , http://www.americanthin ker.com/2005/11/the_truth_about_islamic_crusad.html on 5/15/2009] Some modern writer summed up the evil and wicked ways to Islam as follows, << One writer, Joseph P "Dutch" Bialke, BSCJS, MA, JD, LLM, summed up Islam's evil ope rating ways as follows: <<<"Islamist Al-Qaeda terrorists are irrational--but, their goals are simple.... Reader comment on article: What Do the Terrorists Want? [A Caliphate] Submitted by Joseph P "Dutch" Bialke, BSCJS, MA, JD, LLM (United States), Dec 14 , 2005 at 16:19]>> << Al-Qaeda does not fight for a state or for any acceptable pursuit of self-deter mination, but rather for an ideology contrary to the principled and humanistic t heology, tenets, and traditions of Islam. Al-Qaeda's dogma and raison d'etre, it s "reason for existence," as a self-anointed "Army of Allah [[the mythical old m iddle eastern celestial mood god, "Allah,"]] against all Jews and Crusaders" edi fy al-Qaeda operatives to murder non-Muslims to further al-Qaeda's militant glob al objectives and apparently, albeit secondarily, as a means to enter heaven. Fo r instance, Usama Muhammad bin Awad Laden, al-Qaeda's titular Emir (prince or fi rst-in-command), ordered a fatwa (an Islamic religious dictate) that it is the h oly duty of all Muslims to kill all Americans and all their allies, military and civilian, wherever they can be found, especially Zionist Jews. "Al-Qaeda" literally translates to "The Base." Essentially, al-Qaeda is the insp iration and rallying point for most forms of militant Islamist terrorism. Al-Qae da is an amorphous organization of global reach, composed of members from numero us nationalities, engaging in the intentional murders of protected noncombatants to achieve al-Qaeda's long-term hegemonic Islamist theocratic-political objecti ves. As far as can be determined, al-Qaeda demands that the state of Israel must

be eliminated and replaced in its entirety by Palestine, that all "non-Muslim" countries must cease to exist, and all of their infidel, nonbeliever citizens be converted to Islam, that geographical borders separating Muslim countries be er ased, and that all democratic governments in Muslim countries be replaced by a u nified Islamist government similar to a Talibanesque theocracy. Put another way, al-Qaeda and similar stateless aligned Islamist groups seek app arently to recreate the world and transform it into a borderless unified Islamic totalitarian nation, an ummah, under the law of the shari'ah (the canonical law s of Islam). Al-Qaeda views any government that does not fully implement shari'a h Islamic law as jahiliyya, paganism in the form of people governing and control ling people (rather than the people being governed by Islamist clerics who profe ssedly follow the dictates of Allah). Al-Qaeda has shown that it is ready and wi lling to use all means necessary through jihad, an Islamic holy war, to achieve its stated theocratic-political Islamist vision. In addition, al-Qaeda views its ongoing jihad waged against all they view as infidels as an unwavering spiritua l duty. Al-Qaeda followers view individual death in their self-declared jihad as shahada, glorious martyrdom. Al-Qaeda Islamists supposedly claim that such mart yrdom in this jihad gains the deceased "martyred" al-Qaeda member, the shahid, i mmediate entry into heaven, with added status and avails. In reality, however, a l-Qaeda's war is an unholy hirabah, an illegal furtive war of indiscriminate ter rorism. [source - Islamist Al-Qaeda terrorists are irrational--but, their goals a re simple...., Reader comment on article: What Do the Terrorists Want? [A Caliph ate], Submitted by Joseph P "Dutch" Bialke, BSCJS, MA, JD, LLM (United States), Dec 14, 2005 at 16:19, retrieved from, http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/29966 on 11/06/2008]>> ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND ON THE EVIL WAYS OF ISLAM: Here is some additional background on the evil ways of Islam that clearly show i t as definitely NOT a religion from Almighty God (YHWH), creator of all there is . Mohammed was born at Mecca, Arabia, in a.d. 570, and his Islam quickly spread be yond the borders of the tribal groups of Arabia. The 7th century was startled wi th the rapid advances of his militant religion: Syria fell in 634; Jerusalem in 637; Egypt in 638; Persia in 640; North Africa in 689; and Spain in 711. Both Ch ristians and Jews throughout Europe were terrified until the Islamic troops were halted by Charles Martel at the Battle of Tours, France, in 732. The fate of the Islamic world was much different than that of the Byzantine Empi re. There remains a direct continuity between the state ruled by the caliphs in the 7th century and the Islamic states of today. Yet almost directly after Harun al-Rashid's death in 809, the caliphs began to lose power to local rulers. This loss was the result of religious as well as military developments. After Mohamm ed's death in 632, important men in two different family groups claimed to be th e true successor. The supporters of the family group that won and gained the cal iphate became known later as Sunnites. The other group would become known as Shi ites. The followers of these two groups continue to be a source of tension in th e Islamic world today. In the 10th century a group of Shiites calling themselves Fatimids gained contro l of a region that included what is now northern Africa, Egypt, and Syria. They ruled independently of any caliph at Baghdd and their hold was broken only with t he arrival of the Seljuk Turks - the same Turks against whom the First Crusade w as launched - who were Sunnites. The caliphs also lost power because they could not control their armies. Most of the armies of the caliphs were made up of slaves who had been bought or capture d and armed as soldiers. These slave armies had no loyalty to the caliphs. As a result, they soon became independent mercenaries, hiring themselves out to which ever ruler would pay them the most. Local governors in the Islamic world took ad vantage of this, collecting taxes and paying the armies what they asked in retur

n for support. In this way, powerful local rulers carved out states for themselv es. [ source Koinonia House Online, Bringing the world into focus through the le ns of Scripture, http://www.khouse.org/articles/2002/421/ ] In 638, a Muslim army under Caliph Omar Ibn al-Khattab (ruled 634 644) conquered J erusalem.[source Encyclopedia of the Unusual and Unexplained :: Places of Myster y and Power, Jerusalem, http://www.unexplainedstuff.com/Places-of-Mystery-and-Po wer/Jerusalem.html ] CONCLUSION: [1] As can NOW readily be seen, it is the Palestinians who are wrongfully occupy ing Hebrew, Jewish, land, AND NOT, as the Palestinians WRONGLY claim, the Hebrew s, Jews, occupying Arab land. [2] Jerusalem has since about 1,400 BC. the center of Hebrew, Jewish, life. [3] The Muslims, and NOT the Catholic Church, were the ones who started the Crus ades and forced the Catholic Church to initiate some Crusades. But the Muslims w ere the ones who RAN most of the Crusades as a means of stealing land belonging to others so they could wrongly occupy it. [4] Some do not understand the difference between title and occupancy. Let's loo k at what these both are: TITLE - is a legal term for a bundle of rights in a piece of property in which a party may own either a legal interest or an equitable interest[1] The rights in the bundle may be separated and held by different parties. It may also refer to a formal document that serves as evidence of ownership. Conveyance of the docum ent may be required in order to transfer ownership in the property to another pe rson. Title is distinct from possession, a right that often accompanies ownershi p but is not necessarily sufficient to prove it. In many cases, both possession and title may be transferred independently of each other. POSSESSION - is the actual holding of a thing, whether or not one has any right to do so. The right of possession is the legitimacy of possession (with or witho ut actual possession), the evidence for which is such that the law will uphold i t unless a better claim is proven. The right of property is that right which, if all relevant facts were known (and allowed), would defeat all other claims. Eac h of these may be in a different person. For example, suppose A steals from B, what B had previously bought in good faith from C, which C had earlier stolen from D, which had been an heirloom of D's fa mily for generations, but had originally been stolen centuries earlier (though t his fact is now forgotten by all) from E. Here A has the possession, B has an ap parent right of possession (as evidenced by the purchase), D has the absolute ri ght of possession (being the best claim that can be proven), and the heirs of E, if they knew it, have the right of property, which they cannot prove. Good titl e consists in uniting these three (possession, right of possession, and right of property) in the same person(s). Now, if the financed automobile referenced above was purchased by a company and was being loaned out by a car rental organization, the person who rented the veh icle would have possession; the rental company would be the registered owner and have right of possession, while again, the lienholder would have right of prope rty. [reference - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki /Title_(property)]. Now TITLE must be publically anounced. In ancient times this was done by publica tion on scrools, stone slabs, and other writing means after the first ever assig nment of title example recorded in the Book of Numbers, 34 th. Chapter, in the T orah, now the first five parts of the the inspired word of Almighty God (YHWH), the Bible, by Moses, the choosen prophet Moses (Mosche) as follows: Numbers 34 th Chapter, "And Jehovah spake unto Moses, saying,

2 Command the children of Israel, and say unto them, When ye come into the land of Canaan (this is the land that shall fall unto you for an inheritance, even th e land of Canaan according to the borders thereof), 3 then your south quarter shall be from the wilderness of Zin along by the side of Edom, and your south border shall be from the end of the Salt Sea eastward; 4 and your border shall turn about southward of the ascent of Akrabbim, and pass along to Zin; and the goings out thereof shall be southward of Kadesh-barnea; a nd it shall go forth to Hazar-addar, and pass along to Azmon; 5 and the border shall turn about from Azmon unto the brook of Egypt, and the go ings out thereof shall be at the sea. 6 And for the western border, ye shall have the great sea and the border thereof : this shall be your west border. 7 And this shall be your north border: from the great sea ye shall mark out for you mount Hor; 8 from mount Hor ye shall mark out unto the entrance of Hamath; and the goings o ut of the border shall be at Zedad; 9 and the border shall go forth to Ziphron, and the goings out thereof shall be at Hazar-enan: this shall be your north border. 10 And ye shall mark out your east border from Hazar-enan to Shepham; 11 and the border shall go down from Shepham to Riblah, on the east side of Ain; and the border shall go down, and shall reach unto the side of the sea of Chinn ereth eastward; 12 and the border shall go down to the Jordan, and the goings out thereof shall be at the Salt Sea. This shall be your land according to the borders thereof rou nd about. 13 And Moses commanded the children of Israel, saying, This is the land which ye shall inherit by lot, which Jehovah hath commanded to give unto the nine tribes , and to the half-tribe; 14 for the tribe of the children of Reuben according to their fathers' houses, a nd the tribe of the children of Gad according to their fathers' houses, have rec eived, and the half-tribe of Manasseh have received, their inheritance: 15 the two tribes and the half-tribe have received their inheritance beyond the Jordan at Jericho eastward, toward the sunrising. 16 And Jehovah spake unto Moses, saying, 17 These are the names of the men that shall divide the land unto you for inheri tance: Eleazar the priest, and Joshua the son of Nun. 18 And ye shall take one prince of every tribe, to divide the land for inheritan ce. 19 And these are the names of the men: Of the tribe of Judah, Caleb the son of J ephunneh. 20 And of the tribe of the children of Simeon, Shemuel the son of Ammihud. 21 Of the tribe of Benjamin, Elidad the son of Chislon. 22 And of the tribe of the children of Dan a prince, Bukki the son of Jogli. 23 Of the children of Joseph: of the tribe of the children of Manasseh a prince, Hanniel the son of Ephod. 24 And of the tribe of the children of Ephraim a prince, Kemuel the son of Shiph tan. 25 And of the tribe of the children of Zebulun a prince, Elizaphan the son of Pa rnach. 26 And of the tribe of the children of Issachar a prince, Paltiel the son of Azz an. 27 And of the tribe of the children of Asher a prince, Ahihud the son of Shelomi . 28 And of the tribe of the children of Naphtali a prince, Pedahel the son of Amm ihud. 29 These are they whom Jehovah commanded to divide the inheritance unto the chil dren of Israel in the land of Canaan." (American Standard Version; ASV). This constituted the first ever granting of real title to land in the chronologi cal course of human history, and this by the highest possible authority, Almight

y God (YHWH), the Creator of all there is who has the absolute right to give wha t he wants to whom he wants. This brings up the interesting fact that one can have possession without having a valid title to land. A good example is that of nomadic tribes in the middle ea st and elsewhere such as the Berbers and the New World Indians, they had possess ion, but not title to the land they roamed. [Special note - in the early 1800's some New World Indians were granted title in the form of a titled reservation.] The first granting of title occurred around 1,500 B.C. when the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael gave land title to the ancient Hebrews, nation of Israel, to perpetuity. Before that no one had title, but only possession of lan d; to wit, that was the beginning of land titlement. And this was by the highest possible authority of all, the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael, the highest authority in the universe so his absolu te right to grant title to whom he pleased is of course beyond challenge. Also, the soundness of title depends on several factors or conditions precedent: First, the higher the position of the granter the more legitimate the title is w ith the highest granter being, of course, the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael, the supreme being. This followed by E mperors, Kings or Caliphs, and Presidents or Sultans in that order. REAL LIFE EXAMPLE OF POSESSION STOLEN IN WARFARE: A Roman emperor had conveyed title to land in Spain to his subjects who were in possession in the early part of the common error, but in 711 A.D. much of this l and was stolen from the possessors. Let's look at the historical notes on this f rom a Muslim source, www.sunnahonline.com , <<<" By 700 CE, with famine in the T oledo, strife among the aristocracy and chaos throughout the peninsula, the Visi gothic kingdom was falling apart. This paved the way for the Muslim invasion of 711, which set Spain's destiny quite apart from the rest of Europe. Following the death of the Prophet (saaw) in 632 CE, the Arabs had spread throug h the Middle East and North Africa, bringing Islam with them. According to myth, they were ushered onto the Iberian Peninsula by the sexual exploits of the last Visigoth king, Roderick. Ballads and chronicles relate how he had seduced the y oung Florinda, daughter of Julian, Visigothic governor of Ceuta in north Africa: and how Julian sought revenge by approaching the Muslims with a plan to invade Spain. In dull fact, Julian probably just wanted help in a struggle for the Visi goth throne. In 711 CE Tariq ibn Ziyad, the governor of Tangiers, landed in Gibraltar with ar ound 10,000 men, mostly Berbers (indigenous North Africans). He had some of Rode rick's Visigoth rivals as allies. In the same or following year in the Cadiz pro vince, Roderick's army was decimated and he is thought to have drowned as he fle d. The Visigothic survivors fled to the north of Spain, and within a few years, the Muslims had taken over the rest of the Iberian Peninsula bar a few areas in the Asturian Mountains bordering France" [source - http://www.sunnahonline.com/i lm/seerah/0075_intro.htm]>>>; these Muslims became possessors of the land of Spa in, but they did NOT hold title, and were eventually thrown out and the land ret urned to those holding legitimate title with this being concluded around 1492 A. D. A wrongful possession rectified. This same wrongful situation occurred elsewhere with possession being gained onc e more in warfare and violence, now let's look at another example from a Muslim source, www.sunnahonline.com/ilm/seerah/ , <<<" In April 1453, the Turks laid si ege to Constantinople. Despite the heavy Turkish bombardment of the walls, the i nhabitants of the city were able to repair the fortifications every night. The B yzantines were exhausted but took solace in the old legend that Constantinople w

ould never fall while the Moon was waxing. Then, on the night of 22 May, the Moo n rose in eclipse and their morale was crushed. Mohammed knew of the legend and waited a few days before starting a fresh attack . During the battle a small gate was left open by accident but it was all the Tu rks needed. The sack of Constantinople lasted three days, as the Moon waned." [s ource - http://www.sunnahonline.com/ilm/seerah/]>>>; <<<"unfortunately the legit imate title holders have not regained rightful possession to their legitimate pr operty as yet from those holding possession by force of arms. Yet the property a nd title really belongs to the Byzantines who centuries earlier had been given t itle by a Roman Emperor" [Note, earlier title granting takes precedence over lat er title granting.].[source - Possession is NOT The Same As Title to Land: at, [ http://religioustruths.proboards59.com/ind...read=1164667454 ]>>> The distorted Bible knockoff, the Quran, gives abundant testimony to the existen ce to the ancient kingdom of the Hebrews that has recently come out of a long hi atus. This will now be shown from three different versions of the Quran that tes tify to this kingdom under King Solomon and a visit by the Queen of Sheba. [4] Who Is The Occupier? A Study of The Land Of Palestine By A None Jew INTRODUCTION: Land title research in many areas is a very difficult task. In Mexico, the title s to farm land are so clouded it can take years to adequately search them. In so me places the granting of title to land by a legitimate granter can go back over 3,500 years. One such place is the land of Palestine where current occupancy ha s no relationship to whom holds title. Even some of the most famous buildings in the land of Palestine are actually squ atters on land to which others hold title. The most famous instance of this is t he Temple Mount and its squatter mosque that sits on the site of the ancient tem ple of ancient Hebrew kingdom and belongs to the Hebrews. This mess with many oc cupying land as squatters for which others hold title makes for an untenable pos ition when the rightful title holder takes back his/her land, especially so when it is centuries later. The present situation in much of Palestine is like the battle between the squatt ers and the owners, titleholders of land in the old west in the United States; t o wit, squatters wanting to continue to squat and land owners wanting their land back. However, some additional situations enter the picture since many of the l and owners - their ancestors - were forced off the their land by the Romans and by later Caliphs. Now of course the rule of law should be applied and the squatt ers finally brought to their day of reckoning with reality, they have no title t o the land they are on. INTERNATIONAL COURT RULING WRONG AS IT DID NOT PROPERLY IDENTIFY WHO IS THE OCCU PIER: The Geneva Convention clearly states that an occupying power can not place civil ian settlements in occupied territory, but the Islamic faith has been doing such for approximately 1,400 years. First, in the 7 th. Century they did so in Spain and Palestine and elsewhere and to this day they continue to wrongly occupy man y of these lands except for Spain which kicked them out in the 15 th. Century. B ut they still wrongly occupy Turkey, parts of Palestine, Etc. Now it is about ti me that the International Court of Justice issue a righteous ruling against thes e wrongful occupations instead of trying to justify them in any way. With respect to Jewish (Hebrew) settlements in what is so called Arab land, real ly Jewish (Hebrew) land, it is about time that the wrongful Arab occupiers of th ese lands give them back to their rightful owners. In addition they should pay b

ack to the Jews (Hebrews) the tax wrongfully collected by the Caliphs of the 7 a nd 8 th. Century to the government presently representing the Jews (Hebrews), th e State of Israel, and this with reasonable interest for over 1,200 years. Any declaring Jewish (Hebrew) settlements on Jewish (Hebrew) land is of course a miscarriage of justice for political means and should be null and voided. Howev er, even the government of the State of Israel is caving in to politics instead of insisting on the return of land that is rightfully theirs. Now let s consider land title in brief. PRINCIPLE OF TITLE IN A NUTSHELL: What title is: Now let's look at what land title is from an encyclopedia, <<" Title is a legal term for an owner's interest in a piece of property. It may also refer to a form al document that serves as evidence of ownership. Conveyance of the document may be required in order to transfer ownership in the property to another person. T itle is distinct from possession, a right that often accompanies ownership but i s not necessarily sufficient to prove it. In many cases, both possession and tit le may be transferred independently of each other. [source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia].">> Now note, one may be in possession of land, but not title as they are two distin ct things as will shortly be shown. Possession and title are NOT the same thing: Let's show this fact that possession and title are not the same thing with illus trattion example provided by an encyclopedia, << The three elements of title are possession, the right of possession, and the right of property. Possession is t he actual holding of a thing, with or without any right thereto. The right of po ssession is the right to legitimacy of possession (with or without actual posses sion), the evidence for which is such that the law will uphold it unless a bette r claim is proven. The right of property is that right which, if all relevant fa cts were known (and allowed), would defeat all other claims. Each of these may b e in a different person. For example, suppose A steals from B, what B had previously bought in good faith from C, which C had earlier stolen from D, which had been a heirloom of D's fam ily for generations, but had originally been stolen centuries earlier (though th is fact is now forgotten by all) from E. Here A has the possession, B has an app arent right of possession (as evidenced by the purchase), D has the absolute rig ht of possession (being the best claim that can be proven), and the heirs of E, if they knew it, have the right of property, which they cannot prove. Good title consists in uniting these three (possession, right of possession, and right of property) in the same person(s).[source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia].">> Now note, something could have been forcefully stolen, wrongly occupied, centuri es earlier but that does NOT give the person in charge title in any way. Soundness of title - what it depends on: The soundness of title depends on several factors or conditions precedent: First, the higher the position of the granter the more legitimate the title is w ith the highest granter being, of course, the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael, the supreme being. This followed by E mperors, Kings or Caliphs, and Presidents or Sultans in that order.

Second, the earliest granting of title takes precedence over later grants of tit le. SPECIFIC GRANTING OF TITLE TO ALL LAND IN PALESTINE: Now let's look at who was the granter of title to land in Palestine and to whom: Genesis 15:18 records the conferring of legitimate title to the Promise Land to the Hebrews (Jews) by the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael as foll ows for a record to all men for all of time, "In that day Jehovah made a covenan t with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Eg ypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:" (American Standard Version; ASV) . That this was to be their land per the promise of the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael is also made clear in Deuter onomy 10:11, "And Jehovah said unto me, Arise, take thy journey before the peopl e; and they shall go in and possess the land, which I sware unto their fathers t o give unto them.." (ASV). And, this fact is even shown in the New Testament at Hebrews 11:9, "By faith Abraham, when he was called to go out into a place which he should after receive for an inheritance, obeyed; and he went out, not knowin g whither he went. 9 By faith he sojourned in the land of promise, as in a stran ge country, dwelling in tabernacles with Isaac and Jacob, the heirs with him of the same promise:" (ASV). Now the "Concise Bible Dictionary by George Morrish" says this of the inheritanc e of the Hebrews, the promised land, <<"The land of promise is constantly spoken of as the inheritance of Israel: the land flowing with milk and honey was given to them by God. #De 4:21 Ps 105:11, &c. So when Israel returns to take possessi on of the land in a future day, it is still called their inheritance. #Eze 45:1, &c. This all shews that they were and will be an earthly people, but God blesse d them on earth in relationship with Himself as Jehovah, and will again bless th em on earth when they own the Lord Jesus as their Messiah. In connection with th is God calls Israel His inheritance: He hath chosen them for His own inheritance . #Ps 33:12 78:62, &c.[source - Concise Bible Dictionary by George Morrish]," (n ow in the public domain)>> In fact the true God (YHWH) of Abraham had very specific instructions with respe ct the land in the area he had given them in lawful perpetuity as the supreme be ing, the maker of all there is as shown at Deuteronomy 19:14, "Thou shalt not re move thy neighbor's landmark, which they of old time have set, in thine inherita nce which thou shalt inherit, in the land that Jehovah thy God giveth thee to po ssess it." (ASV); and Job 24:1-2, "Why, seeing times are not hidden from the Alm ighty, do they that know him not see his days? 2 Some remove the landmarks; they violently take away flocks, and feed thereof." (ASV); and Proverbs 22:28, "Remo ve not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set." (ASV); and Proverbs 23 :10, "Remove not the old landmark; and enter not into the fields of the fatherle ss:" (ASV). But squatters have violated all these righteous commands of the true God (YHWH) of Abraham. And as shown by Easton's Bible Dictionary, <<" Landmarks could not be removed without incurring the severe displeasure of God." [source - Easton's Revised Bible Dictionary (Now in the public domain)]>>. In fact, the Eclectic Notes on the Bible on Deuteronomy 19:14 notes, <<" Thou sh alt not remove thy neighbour's landmark "Thy neighbour's landmark, which they of old time have fixed in thine inheritance," shows that there is a divine apporti onment which is not to be interfered with. The inheritance is common to all; all are sons, children, brethren, and have a common portion in Christ and in the Sp irit. But in detail each has an assigned portion, and it is to be our care, acco rding to Deuteronomy, that our neighbour has his full portion. This is in keepin g with the spirit of grace and consideration for the good of others which marks the book. We have no daughters of Zelophehad here desiring inheritance for thems

elves; our care here is that our neighbour's inheritance shall not be infringed upon. The inheritance is enjoyed in a neighbourly way; I can only enjoy your bit of it as you enjoy it, and therefore if I remove your landmark I really defraud myself! It is our interest to see that our neighbours enjoy their full assigned portion. In great part we enjoy the inheritance through our brethren; it is ble ssed to see them enjoying their portion; no one moving spiritually would wish to curtail it in the least degree. This stands in marked contrast with slaying our neighbour, even though such a thing should be done unwittingly. It emphasises t he neighbourly character in which the inheritance is taken up. We get on togethe r by fully recognising the portion assigned to each. If any one's landmark is removed it is not only a wrong done to him, but it tend s to impoverish all by interfering with the way in which God has given things. T he clerical principle has greatly tended to remove landmarks, and has deprived t he people of God of what divine favour would have made available in the brethren generally. The arrangements of men, and human order, are simply a removal of la ndmarks "which they of old time have fixed in thine inheritance." The commandmen ts of the Lord #1Co 14:37 are fixed landmarks, and are not to be disregarded; th ey would give to each one his true spiritual place amongst the brethren for the benefit of all. Many of our neighbours have had their landmarks removed, and we all suffer from it, but our care should be to give full place to what is assigne d by God to each. The inheritance will only be truly and spiritually enjoyed as we are set together in affection, and each holds his portion in relation to the common joy. To be self-centred, or to move independently of one's brethren, is r eally to lose the good of what God has given to others for our benefit as jointheirs with them." [source - Eclectic Notes - eclectic Notes on the Bible (now in the public domain)]>>. Another Bible dictionary says, <<"Promised Land held in trust. Even the people I srael, to whom God had given the land for them to enjoy as landowners, were told by Jehovah that they were not actually owners of it but only held it in trust. He said concerning the sale of a family land estate: "So the land should not be sold in perpetuity, because the land is mine. For you are alien residents and se ttlers from my standpoint." (Le 25:23) God had ousted the Canaanites from the la nd for their disgusting practices. He warned he would also take away all title f rom Israel and drive them out of the land if they followed such practices, and w hen they later did, they were sent into exile. (Le 18:24-30; 25:18, 19; 26:27-33 ; Jer 52:27) After 70 years of desolation of their land, from 607 to 537 B.C.E., God mercifully reestablished them, but this time under Gentile domination. Even tually, in 70 C.E., the Romans completely destroyed Jerusalem and scattered its people. Within the nation, tribes were assigned sections of the land or cities inside th e boundaries of other tribes. Priests and Levites had cities with pasture ground s. (Jos 15-21) In turn, within the tribes families were allotted inheritances. T hese divisions became smaller as families subdivided their own allotments becaus e of increase in numbers. This resulted in thorough cultivation and use of the l and. Inheritances were not allowed to circulate from one tribe to another. To pr event this, women who inherited land (because there were no living brothers) had to marry within the tribe to hold their inheritance.-Nu 36:1-12." [source - Ins ight on the Scriptures, Vol. 2]>>. Earliest grant of title takes precedence over later grants: Now, how does this apply to the granting of title to the land of Palestine? Well the grant of title to Palestine is the oldest recorded grant of title in all hu man history and occurred about 1,500 B.C., by the creator of all there is, and w as in fulfillment of an earlier promise that the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isa ac, and Ishmael had made to Abraham. Therefore, with respect the land of Palesti ne, the land was granted to the Hebrews, the descendents of Abraham through Isaa

c, and it was granted before any other land was granted to anyone. So title to t he land of Palestine was granted by the highest possible authority and was the f irst grant of legitimate title ever made; therefore, the grantees, the Hebrews, have the strongest possible title due to the fact the grantor was the highest po ssible authority and it was granted at the earliest time. There exist over 6 bil lion copies of this granting of title making it the most public ally published n otice of title in the world. Of course some try to deny that by questioning the Bible, but their objection is without standing. Let's look at the facts. Of course many members of Islam reje ct what the Bible says, but is this reasonable considering that their Quran like the Book of Mormon is nothing but a knockoff of the Bible? Now the well known r ule of precedence is that the earlier document shall have precedence over the la ter that used information from it just as the earlier granting of land title tak es precedence in any title search or action at law over the later. Many overlook the fact that the Bible is NOT the product of one committee or strongman as was the Quran and the Book of Mormon. It has over 40 individual writers who wrote u nder divine inspiration/guidance putting the thoughts of God (YHWH) into the wor ds of men much as transcribing secretaries today taking transcription and then l ater typing it out. In other words one real author, God (YHWH), and many scribes each of whom wrote in his own style over a period of approximately 1,600 years. All of what people call or consider inconsistencies are really not such, but mo st often just a problem of translation and/or understanding, i.e., lack of under standing of what the original writer writing in his own language and culture mea nt/said in his original writing. What is remarkable, is the writers over such a period of time all wrote in harmony when even most posters on threads on this fo rum can not even stay on track or subject over a period of a few days and/or wee ks at most with the original subject of the thread. This fact of harmony over a period so great as to almost stagger the imagination shows that it had one guidi ng force or author who divinely inspired its writers as humans of their own voli tion can not keep on track over short periods of time. OTHER BACKUP FOR TITLE TO PALESTINE: FIRST, One Muslim actually posted an article on Jews in Yemen that contained the following account proving that the land belongs to the Hebrews, <<" Perhaps this is a moment to be less visionary and more historical. Perhaps a lso we need to re-focus from how the Middle East problem looks from the perspect ive of top-down peace-making efforts in distant Oslo or even Camp David to a clo ser look at the fabric of coexistence of Sephardic and Oriental Jewries with Mus lim and Arab societies during the 13 centuries before the re-founding of Israel. In this way, we may be able to discover threads of understanding that might lea d us at least part of the way through the maze of current perplexities. In parti cular, might yet the Yemeni Jewish historical trajectory, from the Arab World to Israel, provide unexplored avenues for narrowing the Muslim-Jewish divide?" [so urce - http://www.wzo.org.il/en/resources/view.asp?id=1690 ]>>. Now notice this clearly shows that the Hebrews had occupied the land that the tr ue God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael and established a nation that exist ed for over 1,000 years when it says, <<" the 13 centuries before the re-foundin g of Israel.">>, so those saying Israel is a new nation clearly do NOT know what they are speaking about, actually it is the oldest operating government on eart h that just took a hiatus for some centuries. Now where was this kingdom? It is in the land called Palestine. SECOND, The New Compact Bible Dictionary published by Zondervan Books says this with respect the site where the squatting Dome of the Rock Mosque sits, <<"Templ e, the name given to complex of buildings in Jerusalem which was the center of t he sacrifical cult for the Hebrews. Three temples stood successively on Mt. Mori

ah (II Chron. 3:1) in Jerusalem: Solomon's, Zerubbabel's, and Herod the Great's. ...the Dome of the Rock Mosque which stands on the site of the Temples of Solomo n and Herod.">> so clearly this land belongs to the Hebrews even though it was s wiped from them by <<" Islamic tradition holds that when Muslims first entered t he city of Jerusalem under the leadership of Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab (also kn own as Umar or Omar) in 637, the ruins of the Temple were being used as a rubbis h dump by the Christian inhabitants, perhaps in order to humiliate the Jews and fulfill Jesus' prophecy that not a stone would be left standing on another there ; Caliph Omar (contemporary of Muhammad, who had died a few years earlier), orde red it cleaned and performed prayer there. According to some sources, he also or dered a mosque to be constructed at the spot, upon which site the Al-Aqsa Mosque was built several decades later." [source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia on Temple Mount]>>. However, no where did Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab ever buy the land and/or obtain title from the Hebrews who held rightful title and ownership. The modern government of the Hebrews has been most graceful in permitting the co ntinued squatting of the Al-Aqsa Mosque on property to which they hold title and have not even requested rent from the land so illegally occupied. Now some may question, WRONGLY, the Hebrews ownership, but the restrictions placed on Jews vi siting this area solidify the point beyond doubt as follows, <<" The Rabbis have ruled that Jews may not enter specific areas (approximately 15%) of the Temple Mount [3] because of the danger of entering the area of the Temple courtyard and the difficulty of fulfilling the ritual requirement of cleansing oneself with t he ashes of a red heifer (see Numbers 19), and declared it punishable with karet h, or death by heavenly decree [4]. The boundaries of the areas to be avoided, w hile having large portions in common, are delineated differently by various rabb inic authorities. Many Rabbis have "imposed a blanket ban on access for Jews to the entire Temple Mount"[5], given the uncertainty about the location of the permitted areas, an o pinion still supported by Rabbis such as Ovadia Yosef, Avraham Shapiro, Eliahu B akshi-Doron, and Israel Lau. In August 1967, the Chief Rabbis of Israel, Isser Y ehuda Unterman and Yitzhak Nissim, in concert with other leading rabbis, asserte d that "For generations we have warned against and refrained from entering any p art of the Temple Mount." However, many other rabbis, including Shlomo Goren, former Chief rabbi of Israel , Chaim David Halevi, Dov Lior, Yosef Elboim, Ysrael Ariel, Shar Yeshuv Hacoen a nd Yuval Sharlo have "strongly encouraged" Jews to visit the permitted sections of the Temple Mount. [6]. During Maimonides' residence in Jerusalem, a synagogue stood on the Temple Mount alongside other structures; Maimonides prayed there. The law committee of the Masorti movement (Conservative Judaism in Israel) has i ssued two responsa on the subject, both holding that Jews may visit the permitte d sections of the Temple Mount. One responsa allows such visits, another encoura ges them." [source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia on Temple Mount]>>. Even Muslim's have acknowledged that the Al-Aqsa Mosque sits on the site of the Temple of Solomon, property of the Hebrew nation as follows, <<"The main reason that the Temple Mount is holy in Judaism is that it was the site of the Temple. This fact provides a reason for its holiness in Islam; it is still considered to be the orthodox Islamic position. A Brief Guide to al-Haram al-Sharif, a bookle t published in 1930 by the "Supreme Moslem Council", a body established by the B ritish government to administer waqfs and headed by Hajj Amin al-Husayni during the British Mandate period, states: "The site is one of the oldest in the world. Its sanctity dates from the earlies t times. Its identity with the site of Solomon's Temple is beyond dispute. This, too, is the spot, according to universal belief, on which David built there an altar unto the Lord, and offered burnt offerings and peace offerings." A footnot e refers the reader to 2 Samuel 26:25.

More recent examples include a fatwa issued by the Saudi Sheikh M. S. al-Munajji d, quoted on IslamOnline, 18 March 2001, stating that: Al-Aqsa Mosque (in Jerusa lem) was the first of the two qiblahs (prayer direction), and is one of the thre e mosques to which people may travel for the purpose of worship. And it was said that it was built by Sulayman (Solomon), as stated in Sunan an-Nasa'i and class ed as authentic by al-Albani." [source - - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia on T emple Mount]>>. So there can be NO disputing that a great Hebrew nation existed and had title gi ven by the highest authority possible, the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael, and that they built cities and grand tem ples on this land granted to them. THIRD, Another Bible dictionary with a more amplified account of the Temple of S olomon says, <<"A divine habitation, sacred place or sanctuary, either physical or spiritual, that is employed for worship. The Hebrew word hehkhal', translated "temple," also means "palace." The Greek hieron' and naos' are both rendered "templ e" and may refer to the entire temple complex or to its central edifice; naos', m eaning "sanctuary" or "divine habitation (dwelling)," at times refers specifical ly to the sacred inner rooms of the temple. Solomon's Temple. King David entertained a strong desire to build a house for Je hovah, to contain the ark of the covenant, which was "dwelling in the middle of tent cloths." Jehovah was pleased with David's proposal but told him that, becau se he had shed much blood in warfare, his son (Solomon) would be privileged to d o the building. This was not to say that God did not approve David's wars fought in behalf of Jehovah's name and His people. But the temple was to be built in p eace by a man of peace.-2Sa 7:1-16; 1Ki 5:3-5; 8:17; 1Ch 17:1-14; 22:6-10. Cost. Later David purchased the threshing floor of Ornan (Araunah) the Jebusite on Mount Moriah as the temple site. (2Sa 24:24, 25; 1Ch 21:24, 25)[[Note, King D avid purchased the land from his subject to build the temple and did not swipe i t as Muslim Calips later did; therefore, he had good title.]] He amassed 100,000 talents of gold, 1,000,000 talents of silver, and copper and iron in great abun dance, besides contributing from his personal fortune 3,000 talents of gold and 7,000 talents of silver. He also received as contributions from the princes, gol d worth 5,000 talents and 10,000 darics and silver worth 10,000 talents, as well as much iron and copper. (1Ch 22:14; 29:3-7) This total, amounting to 108,000 t alents and 10,000 darics of gold and 1,017,000 talents of silver, would be worth $48,337,047,000 at current values. His son Solomon did not spend the entire amo unt in building the temple; the remainder he put in the temple treasury.-1Ki 7:5 1; 2Ch 5:1. Workmen. King Solomon began building the temple for Jehovah in the fourth year o f his reign (1034 B.C.E.), in the second month, Ziv, following the architectural plan that David had received by inspiration. (1Ki 6:1; 1Ch 28:11-19) The work c ontinued over a seven-year period. (1Ki 6:37, 38) In exchange for wheat, barley, oil, and wine, Hiram king of Tyre supplied timbers from Lebanon along with skil led workers in wood and stone, and one special expert, also named Hiram, whose f ather was a Tyrian and his mother an Israelitess of the tribe of Naphtali. This man was a fine workman in gold, silver, copper, iron, wood, stones, and fabrics. -1Ki 5:8-11, 18; 7:13, 14, 40, 45; 2Ch 2:13-16. In organizing the work, Solomon conscripted 30,000 men out of Israel, sending th em to Lebanon in shifts of 10,000 for a month, with a two-month stay at home bet ween shifts. (1Ki 5:13, 14) As burden bearers, he conscripted 70,000 from among the "alien residents" in the land, and as cutters, 80,000. (1Ki 5:15; 9:20, 21; 2Ch 2:2) As foremen over the work, Solomon appointed 550 men and apparently 3,30 0 as assistants. (1Ki 5:16; 9:22, 23) It appears that, of these, 250 were Israel

ites and 3,600 were "alien residents" in Israel.-2Ch 2:17, 18... History. This temple existed until 607 B.C.E., when it was destroyed by the Baby lonian army under King Nebuchadnezzar. (2Ki 25:9; 2Ch 36:19; Jer 52:13) Because of the falling away of Israel to false religion, God permitted the nations to ha rass Judah and Jerusalem, at times stripping the temple of its treasures. The te mple also suffered periods of neglect. King Shishak of Egypt robbed it of its tr easures (993 B.C.E.) in the days of Rehoboam the son of Solomon, only about 33 y ears after its inauguration. (1Ki 14:25, 26; 2Ch 12:9) King Asa (977-937 B.C.E.) had respect for Jehovah's house, but to protect Jerusalem he foolishly bribed K ing Ben-hadad I of Syria, with silver and gold from the treasures of the temple, to break his covenant with Baasha king of Israel.-1Ki 15:18, 19; 2Ch 15:17, 18; 16:2, 3. After a period of turbulence and neglect of the temple, King Jehoash of Judah (8 98-859 B.C.E.) oversaw its repair. (2Ki 12:4-12; 2Ch 24:4-14) In the days of his son Amaziah, Jehoash king of Israel robbed it. (2Ki 14:13, 14) King Jotham (777 -762 B.C.E.) did some construction work on the temple area, building "the upper gate." (2Ki 15:32, 35; 2Ch 27:1, 3) King Ahaz of Judah (761-746 B.C.E.) not only sent the treasures of the temple to Tiglath-pileser III, king of Assyria, as a bribe but he also polluted the temple by building an altar patterned after one i n Damascus and by replacing the copper altar of the temple with it. (2Ki 16:5-16 ) Finally he closed the doors of Jehovah's house.-2Ch 28:24. Ahaz' son Hezekiah (745-717 B.C.E.) did what he could to undo the bad works of h is father. At the very beginning of his reign, he reopened the temple and had it cleaned up. (2Ch 29:3, 15, 16) However, later on, for fear of Sennacherib king of Assyria, he cut off the doors and the doorposts of the temple that he himself had caused to be overlaid with gold and sent them to Sennacherib.-2Ki 18:15, 16 . But when Hezekiah died, the temple entered a half century of desecration and dis repair. His son Manasseh (716-662 B.C.E.) went beyond any of Judah's previous ki ngs in wickedness, setting up altars "to all the army of the heavens in two cour tyards of the house of Jehovah." (2Ki 21:1-5; 2Ch 33:1-4) By the time of Manasse h's grandson Josiah (659-629 B.C.E.), the formerly magnificent edifice was in a state of disrepair. Evidently it was in a disorganized or cluttered condition, f or High Priest Hilkiah's finding the book of the Law (likely an original scroll written by Moses) was an exciting discovery. (2Ki 22:3-13; 2Ch 34:8-21) After th e temple's repair and cleansing, the greatest Passover since the days of Samuel the prophet was celebrated. (2Ki 23:21-23; 2Ch 35:17-19) This was during the min istry of the prophet Jeremiah. (Jer 1:1-3) From this time until the temple's des truction, it remained open and in use by the priesthood, though many of the prie sts were corrupt. The Temple Built by Zerubbabel. As foretold by Jehovah's prophet Isaiah, God rai sed up Cyrus king of Persia as a liberator of Israel from the power of Babylon. (Isa 45:1) Jehovah also stirred up his own people under the leadership of Zerubb abel of the tribe of Judah to return to Jerusalem. This they did in 537 B.C.E., after 70 years of desolation, as Jeremiah had foretold, for the purpose of rebui lding the temple. (Ezr 1:1-6; 2:1, 2; Jer 29:10) This structure, though not near ly so glorious as Solomon's temple, endured longer, standing for nearly 500 year s, from 515 B.C.E. to very late in the first century B.C.E. (The temple built by Solomon had served about 420 years, from 1027 to 607 B.C.E.) In Cyrus' decree he ordered: "As for anyone that is left from all the places whe re he is residing as an alien, let the men of his place assist him with silver a nd with gold and with goods and with domestic animals along with the voluntary o ffering for the house of the true God, which was in Jerusalem." (Ezr 1:1-4) Cyru

s also returned 5,400 vessels of gold and silver that Nebuchadnezzar had taken f rom Solomon's temple.-Ezr 1:7-11. In the seventh month (Ethanim, or Tishri) of the year 537 B.C.E., the altar was set up; and in the following year, the foundation of the new temple was laid. As Solomon had done, the builders hired Sidonians and Tyrians to bring cedar timbe rs from Lebanon. (Ezr 3:7) Opposition, particularly from the Samaritans, dishear tened the builders, and after about 15 years those opposers even incited the kin g of Persia to ban the work.-Ezr 4... The Temple Rebuilt by Herod. This temple is not described in any detail in the S criptures. The primary source is Josephus, who personally saw the structure and who reports on its construction in The Jewish War and Jewish Antiquities. The Je wish Mishnah supplies some information, and a little is gained from archaeology. Therefore the description set forth here is from these sources, which in some i nstances may be open to question.-PICTURE, Vol. 2, p. 543. In The Jewish War (I, 401 [xxi, 1]), Josephus says that Herod rebuilt the temple in the 15th year of his reign, but in Jewish Antiquities (XV, 380 [xi, 1]), he says it was in the 18th year. This latter date is generally accepted by scholars , although the beginning of Herod's reign, or how Josephus calculated it, is not established with certainty. The sanctuary itself took 18 months to build, but t he courtyards, and so forth, were under construction for eight years. When certa in Jews approached Jesus Christ in 30 C.E., saying, "This temple was built in fo rty-six years" (Joh 2:20), these Jews were apparently talking about the work tha t continued on the complex of courts and buildings up until then. The work was n ot finished until about six years before the destruction of the temple in 70 C.E . Because of hatred and distrust of Herod, the Jews would not permit him to rebuil d the temple, as he proposed, until he had everything prepared for the new build ing. For the same reason they did not consider this temple as a third one, but o nly as a rebuilt one, speaking only of the first and second temples (Solomon's a nd Zerubbabel's). As to Josephus' measurements, Smith's Dictionary of the Bible (1889, Vol. IV, p. 3203) says: "His horizontal dimensions are so minutely accurate that we almost suspect he had before his eyes, when writing, some ground-plan of the building p repared in the quartermaster-general's department of Titus's army. They form a s trange contrast with his dimensions in height, which, with scarcely an exception , can be shown to be exaggerated, generally doubled. As the buildings were all t hrown down during the siege, it was impossible to convict him of error in respec t to elevations." [source - Insight to the Scripture, Vol. 2]>>. CONCLUSION: So those who claim that the modern nation of Israel is a new nation are without any foundation. The modern nation of Israel is just the RETURN of the ancient na tion of Israel after a long hiatus; to wit, it is just the Hebrews (Jews) reclai ming their land and nation that belongs to them. [5] What Is An Occupation, And Who Is An Occupier? INTRODUCTION: Many do NOT know what an occupation is or who is an occupier; nor can they disti nguish between those occupying an area strictly as a police action, and those oc cupying for the purpose of permanently stealing the land of another. First, let s look at the dictionary definition of occupation:

Occupation = 2a. The act or process of holding or possessing a place. b. The sta te of being held or possessed. 3a. Invasion, conquest, and control of a nation o r territory by foreign armed forces. b. The military government exercising contr ol over an occupied nation or territory. [source - The American Heritage Dictiona ry of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000] Types of occupations: Temporary occupation where an area is occupied for the purpose of establishing l aw and order with a view of leaving as quickly as possible when law and order is established. Permanent occupation is when an area is occupied by foreign forces with a view o f permanently holding the occupied area wrongful occupation. Example, the Nazi G erman occupation of Poland where they intended to make Poland German territory a nd only given up when forced to do so. The wrongful occupation of Palestine by c alips and sultans in the 7 th. Century with the intent of making this area which others held title their own and the wrongful moving in of their followers with no intent of ever giving it back to its rightful owners. Of course some do not understand the right of the rightful owners to retake thei r land as shown by this comment on a forum on the Internet which even criticizes those calling for an end to wrongful occupation and wrongly implying the re-con quest of occupied land from the wrongful occupiers is wrong, You are obviously narrow-minded and uneducated on this topic and an embarrassment to Christianity. I can't believe that you actually believe what you wrote! It i s such a shame that you cannot see and/or understand the error of your twisted, brain-washed ideas about Israel and Palestine. In fact, you have everything comp letely backwards. How can you call the Palestinians greedy when all they want is a decent portion of their OWN land? It is beyond me how anyone in their right m ind could think as you do. For the sake of Christ, please do the RESEARCH! and t hen come back and apologize to all the people you have offended and while you ar e at it, you better ask God to forgive you too since you obviously "know not wha t you do". To be noted, this individual, believe it or not, can NOT even understand that th e rightful owners are in the RIGHT; whereas, the wrongful occupiers are not. Thi s individual even has the nerve to call wrongfully occupied lands by the wrongfu l occupiers their own land. But note, it no where shows that they EVER had legit imate title, and fails to mention they only had possession of the land by wrongf ul conquest illegal occupation with intent to permanently steal it from the land s rightful occupation. FACTS ON TITLE TO LAND: What title is: Now let's look at what land title is from an encyclopedia, <<<" Title is a legal term for an owner's interest in a piece of property. It may also refer to a for mal document that serves as evidence of ownership. Conveyance of the document ma y be required in order to transfer ownership in the property to another person. Title is distinct from possession, a right that often accompanies ownership but is not necessarily sufficient to prove it. In many cases, both possession and ti tle may be transferred independently of each other. [source - Wikipedia, the fre e encyclopedia].">>> Now note, one may be in possession of land, but not title as they are two distin ct things as will shortly be shown.

Possession and title are NOT the same thing: Let's show this fact that possession and title are not the same thing with illus trattion example provided by an encyclopedia, <<< The three elements of title ar e possession, the right of possession, and the right of property. Possession is the actual holding of a thing, with or without any right thereto. The right of p ossession is the right to legitimacy of possession (with or without actual posse ssion), the evidence for which is such that the law will uphold it unless a bett er claim is proven. The right of property is that right which, if all relevant f acts were known (and allowed), would defeat all other claims. Each of these may be in a different person. For example, suppose A steals from B, what B had previously bought in good faith from C, which C had earlier stolen from D, which had been a heirloom of D's fam ily for generations, but had originally been stolen centuries earlier (though th is fact is now forgotten by all) from E. Here A has the possession, B has an app arent right of possession (as evidenced by the purchase), D has the absolute rig ht of possession (being the best claim that can be proven), and the heirs of E, if they knew it, have the right of property, which they cannot prove. Good title consists in uniting these three (possession, right of possession, and right of property) in the same person(s).[source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia].">>> Now note, something could have been stolen, squatted on, centuries earlier but t hat does NOT give the person in charge title in any way. Soundness of title - what it depends on: The soundness of title depends on several factors or conditions precedent: First, the higher the position of the granter the more legitimate the title is w ith the highest granter being, of course, the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael, the supreme being. This followed by E mperors, Kings or Caliphs, and Presidents or Sultans in that order. Second, the earliest granting of title takes precedence over later grants of tit le. SPECIFIC GRANTING OF TITLE TO ALL LAND IN PALESTINE: Now let's look at who was the granter of title to land in Palestine and to whom: Genesis 15:18 records the conferring of legitimate title to the Promise Land to the Hebrews (Jews) by the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael as foll ows for a record to all men for all of time, "In that day Jehovah made a covenan t with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Eg ypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:" (American Standard Version; ASV) . That this was to be their land per the promise of the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael is also made clear in Deuter onomy 10:11, "And Jehovah said unto me, Arise, take thy journey before the peopl e; and they shall go in and possess the land, which I sware unto their fathers t o give unto them.." (ASV). And, this fact is even shown in the New Testament at Hebrews 11:9, "By faith Abraham, when he was called to go out into a place which he should after receive for an inheritance, obeyed; and he went out, not knowin g whither he went. 9 By faith he sojourned in the land of promise, as in a stran ge country, dwelling in tabernacles with Isaac and Jacob, the heirs with him of the same promise:" (ASV). Now the "Concise Bible Dictionary by George Morrish" says this of the inheritanc e of the Hebrews, the promised land, <<<"The land of promise is constantly spoke

n of as the inheritance of Israel: the land flowing with milk and honey was give n to them by God. #De 4:21, Ps 105:11, &c. So when Israel returns to take posses sion of the land in a future day, it is still called their inheritance. #Eze 45: 1, &c. This all shows that they were and will be an earthly people, but God bles sed them on earth in relationship with Himself as Jehovah, and will again bless them on earth when they own the Lord Jesus as their Messiah. In connection with this God calls Israel His inheritance: He hath chosen them for His own inheritan ce. #Ps 33:12 78:62, &c.[source - Concise Bible Dictionary by George Morrish]">> > In fact the true God (YHWH) of Abraham had very specific instructions with respe ct the land in the area he had given them in lawful perpetuity as the supreme be ing, the maker of all there is as shown at Deuteronomy 19:14, "Thou shalt not re move thy neighbor's landmark, which they of old time have set, in thine inherita nce which thou shalt inherit, in the land that Jehovah thy God giveth thee to po ssess it." (ASV); and Job 24:1-2, "Why, seeing times are not hidden from the Alm ighty, do they that know him not see his days? 2 Some remove the landmarks; they violently take away flocks, and feed thereof." (ASV); and Proverbs 22:28, "Remo ve not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set." (ASV); and Proverbs 23 :10, "Remove not the old landmark; and enter not into the fields of the fatherle ss:" (ASV). But squatters have violated all these righteous commands of the true God (YHWH) of Abraham. And as shown by Easton's Bible Dictionary, <<<" Landmark s could not be removed without incurring the severe displeasure of God." [source - Easton's Revised Bible Dictionary]>>>. In fact, the Eclectic Notes on the Bible on Deuteronomy 19:14 notes, <<" Thou sh alt not remove thy neighbour's landmark "Thy neighbour's landmark, which they of old time have fixed in thine inheritance," shows that there is a divine apporti onment which is not to be interfered with. The inheritance is common to all; all are sons, children, brethren, and have a common portion in Christ and in the Sp irit. But in detail each has an assigned portion, and it is to be our care, acco rding to Deuteronomy, that our neighbour has his full portion. This is in keepin g with the spirit of grace and consideration for the good of others which marks the book. We have no daughters of Zelophehad here desiring inheritance for thems elves; our care here is that our neighbour's inheritance shall not be infringed upon. The inheritance is enjoyed in a neighbourly way; I can only enjoy your bit of it as you enjoy it, and therefore if I remove your landmark I really defraud myself! It is our interest to see that our neighbours enjoy their full assigned portion. In great part we enjoy the inheritance through our brethren; it is ble ssed to see them enjoying their portion; no one moving spiritually would wish to curtail it in the least degree. This stands in marked contrast with slaying our neighbour, even though such a thing should be done unwittingly. It emphasises t he neighbourly character in which the inheritance is taken up. We get on togethe r by fully recognising the portion assigned to each. If any one's landmark is removed it is not only a wrong done to him, but it tend s to impoverish all by interfering with the way in which God has given things. T he clerical principle has greatly tended to remove landmarks, and has deprived t he people of God of what divine favour would have made available in the brethren generally. The arrangements of men, and human order, are simply a removal of la ndmarks "which they of old time have fixed in thine inheritance." The commandmen ts of the Lord #1Co 14:37 are fixed landmarks, and are not to be disregarded; th ey would give to each one his true spiritual place amongst the brethren for the benefit of all. Many of our neighbours have had their landmarks removed, and we all suffer from it, but our care should be to give full place to what is assigne d by God to each. The inheritance will only be truly and spiritually enjoyed as we are set together in affection, and each holds his portion in relation to the common joy. To be self-centred, or to move independently of one's brethren, is r eally to lose the good of what God has given to others for our benefit as jointheirs with them." [source - Eclectic Notes - eclectic Notes on the Bible]>>.

Another Bible dictionary says, <<<"Promised Land held in trust. Even the people Israel, to whom God had given the land for them to enjoy as landowners, were tol d by Jehovah that they were not actually owners of it but only held it in trust. He said concerning the sale of a family land estate: "So the land should not be sold in perpetuity, because the land is mine. For you are alien residents and s ettlers from my standpoint." (Le 25:23) God had ousted the Canaanites from the l and for their disgusting practices. He warned he would also take away all title from Israel and drive them out of the land if they followed such practices, and when they later did, they were sent into exile. (Le 18:24-30; 25:18, 19; 26:27-3 3; Jer 52:27) After 70 years of desolation of their land, from 607 to 537 B.C.E. , God mercifully reestablished them, but this time under Gentile domination. Eve ntually, in 70 C.E., the Romans completely destroyed Jerusalem and scattered its people. Within the nation, tribes were assigned sections of the land or cities inside th e boundaries of other tribes. Priests and Levites had cities with pasture ground s. (Jos 15-21) In turn, within the tribes families were allotted inheritances. T hese divisions became smaller as families subdivided their own allotments becaus e of increase in numbers. This resulted in thorough cultivation and use of the l and. Inheritances were not allowed to circulate from one tribe to another. To pr event this, women who inherited land (because there were no living brothers) had to marry within the tribe to hold their inheritance.-Nu 36:1-12." [source - Ins ight on the Scriptures, Vol. 2]>>>. Earliest grant of title takes precedence over later grants: <<<Now, how does this apply to the granting of title to the land of Palestine? W ell the grant of title to Palestine is the oldest recorded grant of title in all human history and occurred about 1,500 B.C., by the creator of all there is, an d was in fulfillment of an earlier promise that the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael had made to Abraham. Therefore, with respect the land of Pale stine, the land was granted to the Hebrews, the descendents of Abraham through I saac, and it was granted before any other land was granted to anyone. So title t o the land of Palestine was granted by the highest possible authority and was th e first grant of legitimate title ever made; therefore, the grantees, the Hebrew s, Israelites, have the strongest possible title due to the fact the grantor was the highest possible authority and it was granted at the earliest time. [[In fa ct, the granting of title by Almighty God (YHWH) to the Hebrews, Israelites, aro und 1,500 B.C. was the first granting of title in all of human history.]] Of course some try to deny that by questioning the Bible, but their objection is without standing. Let's look at the facts. Of course many members of Islam reje ct what the Bible says, but is this reasonable considering that their Quran like the Book of Mormon is nothing but a takeoff of the Bible? Now the well known ru le of precedence is that the earlier document shall have precedence over the lat er that used information from it just as the earlier granting of land title take s precedence in any title search or action at law over the later. Many overlook the fact that the Bible is NOT the product of one committee or strongman as was the Quran and the Book of Mormon. It has over 40 individual writers who wrote un der divine inspiration/guidance putting the thoughts of God (YHWH) into the word s of men much as transcribing secretaries today taking transcription and then la ter typing it out. In other words one real author, God (YHWH), and many scribes each of whom wrote in his own style over a period of approximately 1,600 years. All of what people call or consider inconsistencies are really not such, but mos t often just a problem of translation and/or understanding, i.e., lack of unders tanding of what the original writer writing in his own language and culture mean t/said in his original writing. What is remarkable, is the writers over such a p eriod of time all wrote in harmony when even most posters on threads on this for um can not even stay on track or subject over a period of a few days and/or week

s at most with the original subject of the thread. This fact of harmony over a p eriod so great as to almost stagger the imagination shows that it had one guidin g force or author who divinely inspired its writers as humans of their own volit ion can not keep on track over short periods of time. [source - Whose Land Is It ? A Study of The Land of Palestine at, by Iris the Preacher, http://religioustru ths.proboards59.com/ind...64569930&page=1 ]>>>. Let's first gain an understanding of the granting of land title. Now let's look at what land title is from an encyclopedia, <<<" Title is a legal term for an ow ner's interest in a piece of property. It may also refer to a formal document th at serves as evidence of ownership. Conveyance of the document may be required i n order to transfer ownership in the property to another person. Title is distin ct from possession, a right that often accompanies ownership but is not necessar ily sufficient to prove it. In many cases, both possession and title may be tran sferred independently of each other. [source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia] .">>>. Land title is different from possession. Let's illustrate this with an example p rovided by an encyclopedia, <<< The three elements of title are possession, the right of possession, and the right of property. Possession is the actual holding of a thing, with or without any right thereto. The right of possession is the r ight to legitimacy of possession (with or without actual possession), the eviden ce for which is such that the law will uphold it unless a better claim is proven . The right of property is that right which, if all relevant facts were known (a nd allowed), would defeat all other claims. Each of these may be in a different person. For example, suppose A steals from B, what B had previously bought in good faith from C, which C had earlier stolen from D, which had been a heirloom of D's fam ily for generations, but had originally been stolen centuries earlier (though th is fact is now forgotten by all) from E. Here A has the possession, B has an app arent right of possession (as evidenced by the purchase), D has the absolute rig ht of possession (being the best claim that can be proven), and the heirs of E, if they knew it, have the right of property, which they cannot prove. Good title consists in uniting these three (possession, right of possession, and right of property) in the same person(s).[source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia].">> Now note, something could have been stolen, squatted on, centuries earlier but t hat does NOT give the person in charge title in any way. [source - Palestine Belongs to The Hebrews Per The Everlasting Covenant With The Seeds of Isaac, NOT Ishmael:, Iris the Preacher, http://religioustruths.proboar ds59.com/ind...64569134&page=1 ]>>>. Thus as can clearly be seen, The first granting of title occurred around 1,500 B .C. when the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael gave land title to t he ancient Hebrews, nation of Israel, to perpetuity in an everlasting covenant. Before that no one had title, but only possession of land; to wit, that was the beginning of land titlement. And this was by the highest possible authority of a ll, the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishm ael, the highest authority in the universe so his absolute right to grant title to whom he pleased is of course beyond challenge. So why the argument over whom Palestine rightfully belongs today? Because many I shmaelites, Arabs, the greedy ones, want to destroy world peace and tranquility due to their greed for land that is NOT theirs. The Ishmaelites control over 98 percent of the middle east, and some are so greedy they do not want their brothe r tribe, the Hebrews, even to have the less than two (2) percent of the land tha t the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael gave to them in perpetuity. This is the crux of the problem - GREED.[source - Islam is Delusional - Does No t Recognize Facts at,

http://religioustruths.proboards59.com/ind...64568684&page=1 ]>>>. NOMADS CAN HAVE TEMPORARY POSESSION OF LAND WITHOUT TITLE: One can have possession without having a valid title to land. A good example is that of nomadic tribes in the middle east and elsewhere such as the Berbers and the New World Indians, they had possession, but not title to the land they roame d. [[Special note - in the early 1800's some New World Indians were granted titl e in the form of a titled reservation.]] The first granting of title occurred around 1,500 B.C. when the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael gave land title to the ancient Hebrews, nation of Israel, to perpetuity. Before that no one had title, but only possession of lan d; to wit, that was the beginning of land titlement. And this was by the highest possible authority of all, the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael, the highest authority in the universe so his absolu te right to grant title to whom he pleased is of course beyond challenge. Also, the soundness of title depends on several factors or conditions precedent as previously mentioned. First, the higher the position of the granter the more legitimate the title is w ith the highest granter being, of course, the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael, the supreme being. This followed by E mperors, Kings or Caliphs, and Presidents or Sultans in that order. Second, the earliest granting of title takes precedence over later grants of tit le. SPECIFICS AND EXAMPLES: Now let's look at what land title is from an encyclopedia, <<<" Title is a legal term for an owner's interest in a piece of property. It may also refer to a for mal document that serves as evidence of ownership. Conveyance of the document ma y be required in order to transfer ownership in the property to another person. Title is distinct from possession, a right that often accompanies ownership but is not necessarily sufficient to prove it. In many cases, both possession and ti tle may be transferred independently of each other. [source - Wikipedia, the fre e encyclopedia].">>> Now note, something could have been stolen, squatted on centuries earlier, illeg ally taken in unlawful warfare, etc., but that does NOT give the person in charg e title in any way they are simply WRONGFUL OCCUPIERS. A REAL LIFE EXAMPLE OF POSESSION STOLEN IN WARFARE: A Roman emperor had conveyed title to land in Spain to his subjects who were in possession in the early part of the common error, but in 711 A.D. much of this l and was stolen from the possessors. Let's look at the historical notes on this f rom a Muslim source, www.sunnahonline.com , <<<" By 700 CE, with famine in the T oledo, strife among the aristocracy and chaos throughout the peninsula, the Visi gothic kingdom was falling apart. This paved the way for the Muslim invasion of 711, which set Spain's destiny quite apart from the rest of Europe. Following the death of the Prophet (saaw) in 632 CE, the Arabs had spread throug h the Middle East and North Africa, bringing Islam with them. According to myth, they were ushered onto the Iberian Peninsula by the sexual exploits of the last Visigoth king, Roderick. Ballads and chronicles relate how he had seduced the y oung Florinda, daughter of Julian, Visigothic governor of Ceuta in north Africa: and how Julian sought revenge by approaching the Muslims with a plan to invade

Spain. In dull fact, Julian probably just wanted help in a struggle for the Visi goth throne. In 711 CE Tariq ibn Ziyad, the governor of Tangiers, landed in Gibraltar with ar ound 10,000 men, mostly Berbers (indigenous North Africans). He had some of Rode rick's Visigoth rivals as allies. In the same or following year in the Cadiz pro vince, Roderick's army was decimated and he is thought to have drowned as he fle d. The Visigothic survivors fled to the north of Spain, and within a few years, the Muslims had taken over the rest of the Iberian Peninsula bar a few areas in the Asturian Mountains bordering France" [source - http://www.sunnahonline.com/i lm/seerah/0075_intro.htm]>>>; these Muslims became possessors of the land of Spa in, but they did NOT hold title, and were eventually thrown out and the land ret urned to those holding legitimate title with this being concluded around 1492 A. D. A wrongful possession rectified. This same wrongful situation occurred elsewhere with possession being gained onc e more in warfare and violence, now let's look at another example from a Muslim source, www.sunnahonline.com/ilm/seerah/ , <<<" In April 1453, the Turks laid si ege to Constantinople. Despite the heavy Turkish bombardment of the walls, the i nhabitants of the city were able to repair the fortifications every night. The B yzantines were exhausted but took solace in the old legend that Constantinople w ould never fall while the Moon was waxing. Then, on the night of 22 May, the Moo n rose in eclipse and their morale was crushed. Mohammed knew of the legend and waited a few days before starting a fresh attack . During the battle a small gate was left open by accident but it was all the Tu rks needed. The sack of Constantinople lasted three days, as the Moon waned." [s ource - http://www.sunnahonline.com/ilm/seerah/]>>>; unfortunately the legitimat e title holders have not regained rightful possession to their legitimate proper ty as yet from those holding possession by force of arms. Yet the property and t itle really belongs to the Byzantines who centuries earlier had been given title by a Roman Emperor [Note, earlier title granting takes precedence over later ti tle granting.]. THE WRONGFUL OCCUPATION OF THE LAND OF PALESTINE BY ISHMAELITES: Let's deal with some historic realities; to wit, the Muslims captured Jerusalem and took wrongful occupation of same. They became wrongful occupiers having NO l egitimate right to either Jerusalem or any part of Palestine. Here is what one e ncyclopedia says on that: <<<"After decisively defeating the Byzantine forces at Battle of Yarmouk in Augu st 636 A.D, in early October 636 A.D (late Shaban, 15 Hijrah), Abu Ubaidah ibn a l-Jarrah the commander in chief of Rashidun army in Syria held a council of war to discuss future plans. Opinions of objectives varied between Caesarea and Jeru salem. Abu Ubaidah could see the importance of both these cities, which had so f ar resisted all Muslim attempts at capture, and unable to decide the matter, wro te to Caliph Umar for instructions. In his reply the Caliph ordered the Muslims to capture Jerusalem.[1] Abu Ubaidah therefore marched towards Jerusalem with th e army from Jabiya, Khalid ibn Walid and his Mobile Guard leading the advance. T he Muslims arrived at Jerusalem around early November, and the Byzantine garriso n withdrew into the fortified city." [source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Jerusalem_(637)]>>>. They then brought in their own followers to wrongfully occupy the land, the Pale stines are the descendants of these wrongful occupiers. They became WRONGFUL occupiers and now srael, the rightful titled owner is an rt of Palestine in 1947. What nonsense the rightful titled owner for wanting they scream 'bloodly' that occupier because it kicked for a wrongful occupier to his land back, and kicking the Hebrews, I them out of pa falsely accuse out wrongful o

ccupiers. Reality is that even the rightful owners, the Hebrews, Israelites, who remained in the land were made to pay the Jizya (tribute) illegally, and it has never bee n returned to them by Islam, how wrong can you get? Later caliphs went even further in their evil occupancy and lit the fuse for the Crusades which they wrongly blame on others when it was they that caused them. Let's now look in detail at the cause of the Crusades. THE CAUSE OF THE CRUSADES: Let's look at what was really the cause of the Crusades that Islam blames on apo state (counterfeit) Christians, and aS usual Islam is found to be responsible an d the proverbial fuse lighter. Now here are the facts, Most of Islam blames the apostate (counterfeit) Christians for the Crusades, but in reality Islam caused the Crusades which were the effect or result or consequences of a malicious wron g act by Fatimid Caliph al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah. How so? Well simple, in 1009 this Caliph sacked the pilgrimage hospice in Jerusalem and destroyed the Church of t he Holy Sepulchre. It was later rebuilt by the Byzantine emperor, but this event was remembered in Europe and was the spark or cause for the crusades. [[This in violation of their own agreement of April 637 (Rabi' al-awwal, 16 Hijrah)]]. Now let's look at what an encyclopedia says, <<<" This background in the Christi an West must be matched with that in the Muslim East. Muslim presence in the Hol y Land goes back to the initial Arab conquest of Palestine [[They stole land tha t did not belong to them from the Hebrews, Isralites, and others.]]in the 7th ce ntury. This did not interfere much with pilgrimage to Christian holy sites or th e security of monasteries and Christian communities in the Holy Land of Christen dom, and western Europeans were not much concerned with the loss of far-away Jer usalem when, in the ensuing decades and centuries, they were themselves faced wi th invasions by Muslims and other hostile non-Christians such as the Vikings and Magyars. However, the Muslim armies' successes were putting strong pressure on the Eastern Orthodox Byzantine Empire. A turning point in western attitudes towards the east came in the year 1009, whe n the Fatimid caliph of Cairo, al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah, had the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem destroyed. His successor permitted the Byzantine Empire to rebuild it under stringent circumstances, and pilgrimage was again permitted, but many stories began to be circulated in the West about the cruelty of Muslim s toward Christian pilgrims; these stories then played an important role in the development of the crusades later in the century. The immediate cause of the First Crusade was Alexius I's appeal to Pope Urban II for mercenaries to help him resist Muslim advances into territory of the Byzant ine Empire. In 1071, at the Battle of Manzikert, the Byzantine Empire had been d efeated, and this defeat led to the loss of all but the coastlands of Asia Minor (modern Turkey)[[Another land theft.]]. Although the East-West Schism was brewi ng between the Catholic Western church and the Greek Orthodox Eastern church, Al exius I expected some help from a fellow Christian. However, the response was mu ch larger, and less helpful, than Alexius I desired, as the Pope called for a la rge invasion force to not merely defend the Byzantine Empire but also retake Jer usalem. When the First Crusade was preached in 1095, the Christian princes of northern I beria had been fighting their way out of the mountains of Galicia and Asturias, the Basque Country and Navarre, with increasing success, for about a hundred yea rs. The fall of Moorish Toledo to the Kingdom of Len in 1085 was a major victory, but the turning points of the Reconquista [[The retaking of occupied lands occu pied by wicked members of Islam]] still lay in the future. The disunity of the M

uslim emirs was an essential factor, and the Christians, whose wives remained sa fely behind, were hard to beat: they knew nothing except fighting, they had no g ardens or libraries to defend, and they worked their way forward through alien t erritory populated by infidels, where the Christian fighters felt they could aff ord to wreak havoc. All these factors were soon to be replayed in the fighting g rounds of the East. Spanish historians have traditionally seen the Reconquista [ [Retaking of lands that belonged to them.]] as the molding force in the Castilia n character, with its sense that the highest good was to die fighting for the Ch ristian cause of one's country. While the Reconquista was the most prominent example of Christian war against Mu slim conquests, it is not the only such example. The Norman adventurer Robert Gu iscard had conquered the "toe of Italy," Calabria, in 1057 and was holding what had traditionally been Byzantine territory against the Muslims of Sicily. The ma ritime states of Pisa, Genoa and Catalonia were all actively fighting Islamic st rongholds in Majorca and Sardinia, freeing the coasts of Italy and Catalonia fro m Muslim raids. Much earlier, of course, the Christian homelands of Syria, Leban on, Palestine, Egypt, and so on had been conquered by Muslim armies [[More land grabs by Islam that should be returned, but hasn't been so far.]]. This long his tory of losing territories to a religious enemy, as well as a powerful pincer mo vement on all of Western Europe, created a powerful motive to respond to Byzanti ne emperor Alexius I's call for holy war to defend Christendom, and to recapture the lost lands, starting at the most important one of all, Jerusalem itself.">> > [source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia] So as can readily be seen, the actual cause of the Crusades was the land grabbin g [[Stealing.]] by Islam from both the Hebrews and the apostate (counterfeit) Ch ristians, and the final straw was the malicious sacking of the pilgrimage hospic e in Jerusalem and the destruction of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. CONCLUSION: First, has clearly been shown, the Palestinians are wrongful occupiers of Hebrew , Israelite, lands, and NOT the reverse as some ill informed and/or wicked indiv iduals insist due to their desire to hold onto some of the land belonging to the Hebrews, Israelites. Second, the granting of title to the land of Palestine by Almighty God (YHWH), t he Creator of all there is, was the first granting of title recorded in all of h uman history, and it was the granting of title to perpetuity. Third, it is high time that the descendants of the wrongful occupiers brought in by the Caliphs into the land of Palestine return to the lands of their ancestor s and stop harassing the rightful owners of the land, the Hebrews, Israelites. Fourth, the rightful owners of land have an absolute right to retake stolen land from its WRONGFUL occupiers. [6] Summary On Land Title FIRST, Let's deal with the principle of land title since so much of your post is directly involved with it. You post shows you do NOT HAVE a knowledge of the su bject so I shall give you this knowledge as follows, Some say, Quote: the land was given to the jews by allah that's true but they turned their back o n him and they were punished , that land wasn't theirs for thousands of years an

d even before that it was kanaanites land who are the forfathers of the arabs. But they failed to mention that the 'kanaanites' did NOT have title, but only il legal posession. Let's look at the facts, Quote: Many do NOT have an accurate understanding of land title and of squatters who sq uat on land to which others hold legal title. This article will deal with the fa cts of a specific situation of squatters who have been squatting on the land of others, in many cases, for centuries, and now want to act criminally against tho se having title even though the rightful title holder is willing to give them a large portion of the land. Now let's look at what land title is from an encyclopedia, <<" Title is a legal term for an owner's interest in a piece of property. It may also refer to a form al document that serves as evidence of ownership. Conveyance of the document may be required in order to transfer ownership in the property to another person. T itle is distinct from possession, a right that often accompanies ownership but i s not necessarily sufficient to prove it. In many cases, both possession and tit le may be transferred independently of each other. [source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia].">> Now note, one may be in possession of land, but not title as they are two distin ct things as will shortly be shown. POSESSION AND TITLE TO PROPERTY ARE NOT THE SAME: Let's illustrate this with an example provided by an encyclopedia, << The three elements of title are possession, the right of possession, and the right of prop erty. Possession is the actual holding of a thing, with or without any right the reto. The right of possession is the right to legitimacy of possession (with or without actual possession), the evidence for which is such that the law will uph old it unless a better claim is proven. The right of property is that right whic h, if all relevant facts were known (and allowed), would defeat all other claims . Each of these may be in a different person. For example, suppose A steals from B, what B had previously bought in good faith from C, which C had earlier stolen from D, which had been a heirloom of D's fam ily for generations, but had originally been stolen centuries earlier (though th is fact is now forgotten by all) from E. Here A has the possession, B has an app arent right of possession (as evidenced by the purchase), D has the absolute rig ht of possession (being the best claim that can be proven), and the heirs of E, if they knew it, have the right of property, which they cannot prove. Good title consists in uniting these three (possession, right of possession, and right of property) in the same person(s).[source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia].">> Now note, something could have been stolen, squatted on, centuries earlier but t hat does NOT give the person in charge title in any way.[source - The Ungrateful Squatters and Land Title: at, http://religioustruths.proboards59.com/ind...read=1164667332 ] And, Quote: One can have possession without having a valid title to land. A good example is

that of nomadic tribes in the middle east and elsewhere such as the Berbers and the New World Indians, they had possession, but not title to the land they roame d. [Special note - in the early 1800's some New World Indians were granted title in the form of a titled reservation.] The first granting of title occurred around 1,500 B.C. when the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael gave land title to the ancient Hebrews, nation of Israel, to perpetuity. Before that no one had title, but only possession of lan d; to wit, that was the beginning of land titlement. And this was by the highest possible authority of all, the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael, the highest authority in the universe so his absolu te right to grant title to whom he pleased is of course beyond challenge. Also, the soundness of title depends on several factors or conditions precedent: First, the higher the position of the granter the more legitimate the title is w ith the highest granter being, of course, the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael, the supreme being. This followed by E mperors, Kings or Caliphs, and Presidents or Sultans in that order. Second, the earliest granting of title takes precedence over later grants of tit le. SPECIFICS AND EXAMPLES: Now let's look at what land title is from an encyclopedia, <<" Title is a legal term for an owner's interest in a piece of property. It may also refer to a form al document that serves as evidence of ownership. Conveyance of the document may be required in order to transfer ownership in the property to another person. T itle is distinct from possession, a right that often accompanies ownership but i s not necessarily sufficient to prove it. In many cases, both possession and tit le may be transferred independently of each other. [source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia].">> Let's illustrate this with an example provided by an encyclopedia, << The three elements of title are possession, the right of possession, and the right of prop erty. Possession is the actual holding of a thing, with or without any right the reto. The right of possession is the right to legitimacy of possession (with or without actual possession), the evidence for which is such that the law will uph old it unless a better claim is proven. The right of property is that right whic h, if all relevant facts were known (and allowed), would defeat all other claims . Each of these may be in a different person. For example, suppose A steals from B, what B had previously bought in good faith from C, which C had earlier stolen from D, which had been a heirloom of D's fam ily for generations, but had originally been stolen centuries earlier (though th is fact is now forgotten by all) from E. Here A has the possession, B has an app arent right of possession (as evidenced by the purchase), D has the absolute rig ht of possession (being the best claim that can be proven), and the heirs of E, if they knew it, have the right of property, which they cannot prove. Good title consists in uniting these three (possession, right of possession, and right of property) in the same person(s).[source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia].">> Now note, something could have been stolen, squatted on centuries earlier, illeg ally taken in unlawful warfare, etc., but that does NOT give the person in charg e title in any way. A REAL LIFE EXAMPLE OF POSESSION STOLEN IN WARFARE: A Roman emperor had conveyed title to land in Spain to his subjects who were in

possession in the early part of the common error, but in 711 A.D. much of this l and was stolen from the possessors. Let's look at the historical notes on this f rom a Muslim source, www.sunnahonline.com , <<" By 700 CE, with famine in the To ledo, strife among the aristocracy and chaos throughout the peninsula, the Visig othic kingdom was falling apart. This paved the way for the Muslim invasion of 7 11, which set Spain's destiny quite apart from the rest of Europe. Following the death of the Prophet (saaw) in 632 CE, the Arabs had spread throug h the Middle East and North Africa, bringing Islam with them. According to myth, they were ushered onto the Iberian Peninsula by the sexual exploits of the last Visigoth king, Roderick. Ballads and chronicles relate how he had seduced the y oung Florinda, daughter of Julian, Visigothic governor of Ceuta in north Africa: and how Julian sought revenge by approaching the Muslims with a plan to invade Spain. In dull fact, Julian probably just wanted help in a struggle for the Visi goth throne. In 711 CE Tariq ibn Ziyad, the governor of Tangiers, landed in Gibraltar with ar ound 10,000 men, mostly Berbers (indigenous North Africans). He had some of Rode rick's Visigoth rivals as allies. In the same or following year in the Cadiz pro vince, Roderick's army was decimated and he is thought to have drowned as he fle d. The Visigothic survivors fled to the north of Spain, and within a few years, the Muslims had taken over the rest of the Iberian Peninsula bar a few areas in the Asturian Mountains bordering France" [source - http://www.sunnahonline.com/i lm/seerah/0075_intro.htm]>>; these Muslims became possessors of the land of Spai n, but they did NOT hold title, and were eventually thrown out and the land retu rned to those holding legitimate title with this being concluded around 1492 A.D . A wrongful possession rectified. This same wrongful situation occurred elsewhere with possession being gained onc e more in warfare and violence, now let's look at another example from a Muslim source, www.sunnahonline.com/ilm/seerah/ , <<" In April 1453, the Turks laid sie ge to Constantinople. Despite the heavy Turkish bombardment of the walls, the in habitants of the city were able to repair the fortifications every night. The By zantines were exhausted but took solace in the old legend that Constantinople wo uld never fall while the Moon was waxing. Then, on the night of 22 May, the Moon rose in eclipse and their morale was crushed. Mohammed knew of the legend and waited a few days before starting a fresh attack . During the battle a small gate was left open by accident but it was all the Tu rks needed. The sack of Constantinople lasted three days, as the Moon waned." [s ource - http://www.sunnahonline.com/ilm/seerah/]>>; unfortunately the legitimate title holders have not regained rightful possession to their legitimate propert y as yet from those holding possession by force of arms. Yet the property and ti tle really belongs to the Byzantines who centuries earlier had been given title by a Roman Emperor [Note, earlier title granting takes precedence over later tit le granting.].[source - Possession is NOT The Same As Title to Land: at, http://religioustruths.proboards59.com/ind...read=1164667454 ] And, Quote: Of course many members of Islam reject what the Bible says, but is this reasonab le considering that their Quran like the Book of Mormon is nothing but a knockof f of the Bible? Now the well known rule of precedence is that the earlier docume nt shall have precedence over the later that used information from it just as th e earlier granting of land title takes precedence in any title search or action at law over the later.[source - Hezbollah is Responsible For All and Should Pay

For All: at, http://religioustruths.proboards59.com/ind...read=1163180974 ] And, Quote: PRINCIPLE OF TITLE IN A NUTSHELL: What title is: Now let's look at what land title is from an encyclopedia, <<" Title is a legal term for an owner's interest in a piece of property. It may also refer to a form al document that serves as evidence of ownership. Conveyance of the document may be required in order to transfer ownership in the property to another person. T itle is distinct from possession, a right that often accompanies ownership but i s not necessarily sufficient to prove it. In many cases, both possession and tit le may be transferred independently of each other. [source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia].">> Now note, one may be in possession of land, but not title as they are two distin ct things as will shortly be shown. Possession and title are NOT the same thing: Let's show this fact that possession and title are not the same thing with illus trattion example provided by an encyclopedia, << The three elements of title are possession, the right of possession, and the right of property. Possession is t he actual holding of a thing, with or without any right thereto. The right of po ssession is the right to legitimacy of possession (with or without actual posses sion), the evidence for which is such that the law will uphold it unless a bette r claim is proven. The right of property is that right which, if all relevant fa cts were known (and allowed), would defeat all other claims. Each of these may b e in a different person. For example, suppose A steals from B, what B had previously bought in good faith from C, which C had earlier stolen from D, which had been a heirloom of D's fam ily for generations, but had originally been stolen centuries earlier (though th is fact is now forgotten by all) from E. Here A has the possession, B has an app arent right of possession (as evidenced by the purchase), D has the absolute rig ht of possession (being the best claim that can be proven), and the heirs of E, if they knew it, have the right of property, which they cannot prove. Good title consists in uniting these three (possession, right of possession, and right of property) in the same person(s).[source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia].">> Now note, something could have been stolen, squatted on, centuries earlier but t hat does NOT give the person in charge title in any way. Soundness of title - what it depends on: The soundness of title depends on several factors or conditions precedent: First, the higher the position of the granter the more legitimate the title is w ith the highest granter being, of course, the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael, the supreme being. This followed by E mperors, Kings or Caliphs, and Presidents or Sultans in that order.

Second, the earliest granting of title takes precedence over later grants of tit le. SPECIFIC GRANTING OF TITLE TO ALL LAND IN PALESTINE: Now let's look at who was the granter of title to land in Palestine and to whom: Genesis 15:18 records the conferring of legitimate title to the Promise Land to the Hebrews (Jews) by the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael as foll ows for a record to all men for all of time, "In that day Jehovah made a covenan t with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Eg ypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:" (American Standard Version; ASV) . That this was to be their land per the promise of the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael is also made clear in Deuter onomy 10:11, "And Jehovah said unto me, Arise, take thy journey before the peopl e; and they shall go in and possess the land, which I sware unto their fathers t o give unto them.." (ASV). And, this fact is even shown in the New Testament at Hebrews 11:9, "By faith Abraham, when he was called to go out into a place which he should after receive for an inheritance, obeyed; and he went out, not knowin g whither he went. 9 By faith he sojourned in the land of promise, as in a stran ge country, dwelling in tabernacles with Isaac and Jacob, the heirs with him of the same promise:" (ASV). Now the "Concise Bible Dictionary by George Morrish" says this of the inheritanc e of the Hebrews, the promised land, <<"The land of promise is constantly spoken of as the inheritance of Israel: the land flowing with milk and honey was given to them by God. #De 4:21 Ps 105:11, &c. So when Israel returns to take possessi on of the land in a future day, it is still called their inheritance. #Eze 45:1, &c. This all shews that they were and will be an earthly people, but God blesse d them on earth in relationship with Himself as Jehovah, and will again bless th em on earth when they own the Lord Jesus as their Messiah. In connection with th is God calls Israel His inheritance: He hath chosen them for His own inheritance . #Ps 33:12 78:62, &c.[source - Concise Bible Dictionary by George Morrish]">> In fact the true God (YHWH) of Abraham had very specific instructions with respe ct the land in the area he had given them in lawful perpetuity as the supreme be ing, the maker of all there is as shown at Deuteronomy 19:14, "Thou shalt not re move thy neighbor's landmark, which they of old time have set, in thine inherita nce which thou shalt inherit, in the land that Jehovah thy God giveth thee to po ssess it." (ASV); and Job 24:1-2, "Why, seeing times are not hidden from the Alm ighty, do they that know him not see his days? 2 Some remove the landmarks; they violently take away flocks, and feed thereof." (ASV); and Proverbs 22:28, "Remo ve not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set." (ASV); and Proverbs 23 :10, "Remove not the old landmark; and enter not into the fields of the fatherle ss:" (ASV). But squatters have violated all these righteous commands of the true God (YHWH) of Abraham. And as shown by Easton's Bible Dictionary, <<" Landmarks could not be removed without incurring the severe displeasure of God." [source - Easton's Revised Bible Dictionary]>>. Quote: In fact, the Eclectic Notes on the Bible on Deuteronomy 19:14 notes, <<" Thou sh alt not remove thy neighbour's landmark "Thy neighbour's landmark, which they of old time have fixed in thine inheritance," shows that there is a divine apporti onment which is not to be interfered with. The inheritance is common to all; all are sons, children, brethren, and have a common portion in Christ and in the Sp irit. But in detail each has an assigned portion, and it is to be our care, acco rding to Deuteronomy, that our neighbour has his full portion. This is in keepin g with the spirit of grace and consideration for the good of others which marks the book. We have no daughters of Zelophehad here desiring inheritance for thems elves; our care here is that our neighbour's inheritance shall not be infringed

upon. The inheritance is enjoyed in a neighbourly way; I can only enjoy your bit of it as you enjoy it, and therefore if I remove your landmark I really defraud myself! It is our interest to see that our neighbours enjoy their full assigned portion. In great part we enjoy the inheritance through our brethren; it is ble ssed to see them enjoying their portion; no one moving spiritually would wish to curtail it in the least degree. This stands in marked contrast with slaying our neighbour, even though such a thing should be done unwittingly. It emphasises t he neighbourly character in which the inheritance is taken up. We get on togethe r by fully recognising the portion assigned to each. If any one's landmark is removed it is not only a wrong done to him, but it tend s to impoverish all by interfering with the way in which God has given things. T he clerical principle has greatly tended to remove landmarks, and has deprived t he people of God of what divine favour would have made available in the brethren generally. The arrangements of men, and human order, are simply a removal of la ndmarks "which they of old time have fixed in thine inheritance." The commandmen ts of the Lord #1Co 14:37 are fixed landmarks, and are not to be disregarded; th ey would give to each one his true spiritual place amongst the brethren for the benefit of all. Many of our neighbours have had their landmarks removed, and we all suffer from it, but our care should be to give full place to what is assigne d by God to each. The inheritance will only be truly and spiritually enjoyed as we are set together in affection, and each holds his portion in relation to the common joy. To be self-centred, or to move independently of one's brethren, is r eally to lose the good of what God has given to others for our benefit as jointheirs with them." [source - Eclectic Notes - eclectic Notes on the Bible]>>. Another Bible dictionary says, <<"<<"Promised Land held in trust. Even the peopl e Israel, to whom God had given the land for them to enjoy as landowners, were t old by Jehovah that they were not actually owners of it but only held it in trus t. He said concerning the sale of a family land estate: "So the land should not be sold in perpetuity, because the land is mine. For you are alien residents and settlers from my standpoint." (Le 25:23) God had ousted the Canaanites from the land for their disgusting practices. He warned he would also take away all titl e from Israel and drive them out of the land if they followed such practices, an d when they later did, they were sent into exile. (Le 18:24-30; 25:18, 19; 26:27 -33; Jer 52:27) After 70 years of desolation of their land, from 607 to 537 B.C. E., God mercifully reestablished them, but this time under Gentile domination. E ventually, in 70 C.E., the Romans completely destroyed Jerusalem and scattered i ts people. Within the nation, tribes were assigned sections of the land or cities inside th e boundaries of other tribes. Priests and Levites had cities with pasture ground s. (Jos 15-21) In turn, within the tribes families were allotted inheritances. T hese divisions became smaller as families subdivided their own allotments becaus e of increase in numbers. This resulted in thorough cultivation and use of the l and. Inheritances were not allowed to circulate from one tribe to another. To pr event this, women who inherited land (because there were no living brothers) had to marry within the tribe to hold their inheritance.-Nu 36:1-12." [source - Ins ight on the Scriptures, Vol. 2]>>. Earliest grant of title takes precedence over later grants: Now, how does this apply to the granting of title to the land of Palestine? Well the grant of title to Palestine is the oldest recorded grant of title in all hu man history and occurred about 1,500 B.C., by the creator of all there is, and w as in fulfillment of an earlier promise that the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isa ac, and Ishmael had made to Abraham. Therefore, with respect the land of Palesti ne, the land was granted to the Hebrews, the descendents of Abraham through Isaa c, and it was granted before any other land was granted to anyone. So title to t he land of Palestine was granted by the highest possible authority and was the f

irst grant of legitimate title ever made; therefore, the grantees, the Hebrews, have the strongest possible title due to the fact the grantor was the highest po ssible authority and it was granted at the earliest time. Of course some try to deny that by questioning the Bible, but their objection is without standing. Let's look at the facts. Of course many members of Islam reje ct what the Bible says, but is this reasonable considering that their Quran like the Book of Mormon is nothing but a knockoff of the Bible? Now the well known r ule of precedence is that the earlier document shall have precedence over the la ter that used information from it just as the earlier granting of land title tak es precedence in any title search or action at law over the later. Many overlook the fact that the Bible is NOT the product of one committee or strongman as was the Quran and the Book of Mormon. It has over 40 individual writers who wrote u nder divine inspiration/guidance putting the thoughts of God (YHWH) into the wor ds of men much as transcribing secretaries today taking transcription and then l ater typing it out. In other words one real author, God (YHWH), and many scribes each of whom wrote in his own style over a period of approximately 1,600 years. All of what people call or consider inconsistencies are really not such, but mo st often just a problem of translation and/or understanding, i.e., lack of under standing of what the original writer writing in his own language and culture mea nt/said in his original writing. What is remarkable, is the writers over such a period of time all wrote in harmony when even most posters on threads on this fo rum can not even stay on track or subject over a period of a few days and/or wee ks at most with the original subject of the thread. This fact of harmony over a period so great as to almost stagger the imagination shows that it had one guidi ng force or author who divinely inspired its writers as humans of their own voli tion can not keep on track over short periods of time. [source - Whose Land Is I t? A Study of The Land of Palestine at, http://religioustruths.proboards59.com/ind...64569930&page=1 ] And, Quote: Thus as can clearly be seen, The first granting of title occurred around 1,500 B .C. when the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael gave land title to t he ancient Hebrews, nation of Israel, to perpetuity in an everlasting covenant. Before that no one had title, but only possession of land; to wit, that was the beginning of land titlement. And this was by the highest possible authority of a ll, the creator of all there is, the true God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishm ael, the highest authority in the universe so his absolute right to grant title to whom he pleased is of course beyond challenge. So why the argument over whom Palestine rightfully belongs today? Because many I shmaelites, the greedy ones, want to destroy world peace and tranquility due to their greed for land that is NOT theirs. The Ishmaelites control over 98 percent of the middle east, and some are so greedy they do not want their brother tribe , the Hebrews, even to have the less than two (2) percent of the land that the t rue God (YHWH) of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael gave to them in perpetuity. This i s the crux of the problem - GREED.[source - Islam is Delusional - Does Not Recog nize Facts at, http://religioustruths.proboards59.com/ind...64568684&page=1 ] And,

Quote: Let's first gain an understanding of the granting of land title. Now let's look at what land title is from an encyclopedia, <<" Title is a legal term for an own er's interest in a piece of property. It may also refer to a formal document tha t serves as evidence of ownership. Conveyance of the document may be required in order to transfer ownership in the property to another person. Title is distinc t from possession, a right that often accompanies ownership but is not necessari ly sufficient to prove it. In many cases, both possession and title may be trans ferred independently of each other. [source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia]. ">> Land title is different from possession. Let's illustrate this with an example p rovided by an encyclopedia, << The three elements of title are possession, the r ight of possession, and the right of property. Possession is the actual holding of a thing, with or without any right thereto. The right of possession is the ri ght to legitimacy of possession (with or without actual possession), the evidenc e for which is such that the law will uphold it unless a better claim is proven. The right of property is that right which, if all relevant facts were known (an d allowed), would defeat all other claims. Each of these may be in a different p erson. For example, suppose A steals from B, what B had previously bought in good faith from C, which C had earlier stolen from D, which had been a heirloom of D's fam ily for generations, but had originally been stolen centuries earlier (though th is fact is now forgotten by all) from E. Here A has the possession, B has an app arent right of possession (as evidenced by the purchase), D has the absolute rig ht of possession (being the best claim that can be proven), and the heirs of E, if they knew it, have the right of property, which they cannot prove. Good title consists in uniting these three (possession, right of possession, and right of property) in the same person(s).[source - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia].">> Now note, something could have been stolen, squatted on, centuries earlier but t hat does NOT give the person in charge title in any way. [source - Palestine Belongs to The Hebrews Per The Everlasting Covenant With The Seeds of Isaac, NOT Ishmael: at, http://religioustruths.proboards59.com/ind...64569134&page=1 ] Now you should have an understanding of the principle of land title. Your Friend in Christ Iriseightyninei