Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
A Paper
By
Jack Hakimian
Winter 2006
CONTENTS
Introduction 3
Conclusion 14
Bibliography 15
2
Introduction
Evangelicalism, like yeast, has worked through the dough of the church for the last 250
years leaving a lasting impression. This word, “evangelicalism”, has various meanings in
different geographical and cultural context.1 What does this term mean in our American and
European context? According to Professor, Jehu Hanciles the best definition and most widely
“Evangelical religion: conversion, the belief that lives need to be changed; activism,
the expression of the gospel in effort; biblicism, a particular regard for the Bible; and what
may be called crucicentrism, a stress on the sacrifice of Christ on the cross. Together form
a quadrilateral or priorities that are the basis of Evangelicalism.”3
Evangelicalism had its origins in Britain and spread into America by the mid 1700’s.4
However, from America it began to grow all over the world. The movement early on affected
believers of various backgrounds and denominations. In fact, it was so diverse and wide
spread that Lewis writes, “Evangelical engagement during the nineteenth century with
nineteenth century was the driving force of Christianity as a renewal and missions’
movement..6
1
Dr. Jehu Hanciles, “Lecture: How Would You Define an Evangelical” (Fuller Theological Seminary: Global
Evangelical Movement Course, 2006) Lecture.
2
Dr. Jehu Hanciles, Lecture.
3
D.W . Bebbington, Evangelicalism in Modern Britain (New York, NY: Routledge, 2002) pg 3.
4
Bebbington, 20.
5
Donald M Lewis, “Christianity Reborn the Global Expansion of Evangelicalism in the Twentieth Century”
(Grand Rapids, Michigan: Erdmans Publishing, 2004) pg 46.
6
Lewis, 31.
3
The objective of this paper is to examine the missiological climate of evangelicalism in
America at the end of the eighteen century and the methods used to spread the evangelical
message to other parts of the world during the beginning of the nineteenth century. Due, to
length constraints, this paper will focus on the missionary motives and methodologies by
examining the work of the American Evangelical Missionaries in Armenia between the time
line of 1820 and 1845. In order to get a good understanding of the context I will have to trace
the American evangelical missions’ movement that began to climax around 1795 to the early
years of the nineteenth century. My objective in this paper is to demonstrate clear patterns of
behavior with evangelicals and social realities amongst the recipients of their ministry that
dramatically in America.7 Evangelicals began to exercise their preaching efforts towards the
unconverted.8 They went from seeking revival in churches to wanting to see the heathen saved.
According to Noll’s abridged chronology, the years’ leading up to 1795 demonstrates the
missionary zeal of the evangelicals.9 For example, in 1778- Thomas Coke appeals to Methodist
to work in the Africa Mission field. Then, in 1779-Charles, Simeon becomes a key figure for
Anglican evangelicals. Then, in 1784-, The General Evangelical Society is founded to recruit
7
Mark A. Noll, “The Rise of Evangelicalism: The Age of Edwards, W hitefield and the W esleys” (Downers Grove,
Illinois: Intervarsity Press, 2003) pg 192.
8
Noll, 192.
9
Noll, 193. The entire chronology after this statement is taken from Noll’s point-by-point chronology on page 193.
Due to space, I have footnoted that Noll is the original author of the paraphrased chronology I have written. The
events demonstrate the increasing growth of missionary consciousness amongst evangelicals over the seventeen-year
period (1778-1794).
4
missionaries for Ireland. Then, in1792- William Carey publishes an article that appeals for
missionary outreach. The next year he and his family began a mission’s work in India. Then, in
1793-Richard Allen and other African Americans found Bethel African Methodist Episcopal
Church as the first black Methodist church in America. Then, in 1794-, Samuel Marsden arrives
in Sydney to launch missions work in New Zealand and the Pacific Islands. Seventhly, in 1795-
Robert and James Alexander Haldance are converted and begin using their wealth for promoting
As we can see at the turn of the eighteen century, the spiritual climate of evangelicalism
began to change. The reasons for this change were due to the decline of Calvinism and the
“In the article ‘The American Missionary Spirit, 1828-35’ it is argued that the changing
economic and political patterns in the United states made the period and age of Christian
benevolence, with its religious expression. The religious phase was the united endeavor
aiming at the conversion of the world.”11
Some of the key people that brought this new outlook of missions were people like T.J.
Freinghuysen, Presbyterians Tenants, Jonathan Edwards, and George Whitefield who was the key
proponents of the First Great Awakening in America.12 These revivals in America helped create
an atmosphere of conversation and evangelistic passion. By the second Great Awakening, which
ended in 1800, the missionary fire grew so intensely that by 1810 students of Andover
Theological Seminary formed one of the greatest missionary organizations of that time. The main
10
Giragos H. Chopourian, “The Armenian Evangelical Reformation Causes, and Effects”(New York, NY: The
Armenian Missionary Association of America, Inc, 1970) pg 19.
11
Chopourian, 19.
12
Chopourian, 19-20.
5
influencer of this new movement was Samuel Hopkins.13 In his book “Inquiry into the Nature of
Holiness” written in 1773, he argued, “if being cast off by God is necessary in order to secure a
greater good than one’s own salvation; the Christian ought to be willing to be cast off ”.14 Also,
the idea of establishing God’s kingdom on earth under the “Millennial Concept” helped
perpetuate a missionary zeal amongst the Andover students. It was from this school that men
were raised up who preached with passion and conviction that unregenerate people should repent
and trust in the salvific work of the Lord Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit.15 Chopourian writes
“….traditions from which the missionaries had come was mostly in operation
both in their life and work. Time and again, the missionary literature exposes their
opposition to papacy, celibacy, ceremonialism, episcopacy, monasticism, and the Armenian
Church’s sacraments and theology. In contrast, they insist upon the importance of spiritual
religion, the reform of a corrupt church, the acceptance of the biblical standards of the
teaching of Christ and the early church, and revivalist kind of preaching”.16
Therefore, the climate in America had changed from merely awakenings amongst protestant
spiritually deceived believers in the Roman and Eastern Oriental Churches. It was this growing
sentiment for missions, political crisis in the world and a millennial theology that sparked a fire
in two missionaries from Andover Seminary to go to the Middle East and preach the gospel to
Muslims.
13
Chopourian, 20.
14
Chopourian, 20.
15
Chopourian, 21.
16
Chopourian, 21.
6
It is in the previous context that we see these American missionaries crossing the Atlantic
to start their evangelical work to Muslims. However, it was not long before they realized
that converting Muslims to Christ was a very difficult task. The American Missions
“As to Mohammedans, there is no doubt in the mind of any man acquainted with
these countries, that so as things remain in their present state, the profession of Christianity
by a Muslim man will bring upon him inevitable and immediate death. The rules, and the
people of all ranks, would act with equal zeal, and would bring down the exterminating axe
with steady and inexorable vengeance”.17
Therefore, with this roadblock the missionaries turned their attention to the Armenian
people. They believed if the Armenians returned to their Christian heritage they would be fit to
evangelize their Muslim neighbors in an effective fashion.18 In fact, Chopourian writes that
Goodell received new instructions, which were “to reach the Armenian population of the city,-an
intelligent, enterprising and wealthy part of the people, who might be expected to exert a
powerful influence for good throughout the Turkish Empire, when once they should embrace the
truth as it is in Jesus”.19
In Jerusalem around 1820, they would meet the three Armenian priests Bishop Dionysius
Garabedian, Archbishop Jacob Aga, and Bishop Hagop.20 These men according Tootikian,
“Had moved out of St. James Monastery of Jerusalem in protest against the
‘sunken morals of the clergy.’ They were also instrumental in describing the existing
spiritual state of the Armenian Apostolic church to the American missionaries. Moreover,
17
Chopourian, 25-26.
18
Chopourian, 26.
19
Chopourian, 26.
20
Chopourian, 24.
7
they stressed the dire need of the Armenian masses for education and knowledge of
Scriptures and informed the missionaries about the existing political and social conditions
of the Armenians under the Ottoman rule.”21
Two of them would later join the missionaries and begin immediately to labor together
for the conversion of Armenians. However, when things got tense between Christians and
Muslim fanatics in Beirut they left with the missionaries to the Island of Malta for the work of
printing Armenian litetuare. They began with an Armeno-Turkish tracts and then
In 1833, John Der-Sahakian met the American missionaries and the active missionary
outreach began. Formerly Sahakian had been a student at the patriarchal academy under the
famous teacher Gregory Peshtimaljian.23 This teacher had greatly challenged students like
Sahakian to think critically about the superstitions of the church. The church at this time taught
that it was the sole responsibility of the church to read and interpret the Bible, the church could
never err (infallibility), that works (seven church sacraments) were needed to be saved, and
communion was the act of partaking of the real body and blood of Christ.24 Due to this
corruption, Sahakian was seeking to bring reformation, but did not know how.25 When news had
reached him that two missionaries from America had arrived to spread false teachings the young
man was curious to meet them. He wanted to see first hand what these men were propagating.26
In 1833, Sahakian came to the mission in the suburb of Ortakeuy and his life was dramatically
21
Tootikian, 21.
22
Arpee, 94.
23
Arpee, 94
24
Chopourian, 79-80.
25
Arpee, 96.
26
Arpee, 96.
8
changed. Sahakian and his friend Minassian began to work with the American missionaries to
become interpreters of the message to the Armenian people. After a few months, Sahakian was
Soon the Apostolic Armenian Church began to persecute the mission school and
demanded that all parents withdraw their children.27 All this persecution expanded Sahakian’s
influence. Later Sahakian was called to the prestigious school in Haskkeuy to work with a
friendly and cooperative priest by the name of George Ardsrouni. Arpee writes about this priest,
“Endowed with great personal magnetism and boldness of speech, priest George, although he
never became a Protestant, was at this time, both in school and parish, a most worthy
However, Sahakian was removed as he was in Pera, because the opposition from the
state-church was severe. Nevertheless, evangelicalism grew. By 1838, the evangelical movement
grew to about five hundred adherents.29 During this time, the two American missionaries worked
hard. Goodell was conducting weekly Bible studies and prayer meetings in the Turkish dialect.
Dwight was preaching in the Armenian tongue. As a secret society, the Evangelical Union
organized in 1836 and steadily grew under Sahakian’s leadership. Interestingly the Americans
engaged in a work of building the Sultan of Turkey’s favorite palaces, which in turn made their
work of building an evangelical church easier.30 As a result, many of the Armenian state-church
27
Arpee, 96.
28
Arpee, 96.
29
Arpee, 99.
30
Arpee, 100.
9
leaders sought to change the patriarchal vicar Stephen “the Dove” because he had been open to
the missionaries. Being weak in power, they continued in their persecution and eventually
changed the leadership with Jacob Seropian, Bishop of Marsovan, and Amasia.
On February 19, 1839, Sahakian and Paul of Physica were arrested and thrown into the
patriarchal jail. Without trial, they were sent into exile by imperial edict. Later the priest George
was arrested and exiled to the Convent of Armash, near Nicomedia. On March 3, all missionary
publications were banned or destroyed. The persecution continued until the Sultan Mahmoud
died. After this, all the Protestant opponents lost their influence and actually saw themselves in
By 1840, the exiles were back in Armenia by the invitation of the Protestant opponents.
In May 1840, Stephen “the dove” was placed back into power. The response of the common
people was very positive to evangelicalism and once again, it began to grow. In 1832, Goodell
went and visited the city of Nicomedia. When he arrived, he left Armeno-Turkish tracts and a
New Testament with a priest. This led to an awakening in the church. Kit Varjabed was the
principal of the parish school. He was so passionate that he began to gather other priests and
laymen who met daily for the study of scripture.32 According to Arpee, “In 1838 the band
numbered sixteen souls. The fundamental doctrines of the gospel-so we are told by the
missionaries who visited them-were very clearly apprehended by these men, and earnest
spirituality was their distinctive mark.”33 These men were later called “Christian Brethren” and
they sparked a revival that would give the evangelical cause momentum.34
31
Arpee, 103.
32
Arpee, 106.
33
Arpee, 106.
34
Arpee, 106.
10
When the awakening sparked the Armenians it is recorded that, “Everywhere the tone of
religious feeling appeared to be changing. The clergy sought more and more in the Bible the
topics for their public discourses. In the public places at the capital, such as coffee shops and
bazaars, the new doctrines were freely discussed.”35 Amazingly the revival like an avalanche
continued to grow in Armenia and even took a Pentecostal form some fifty years before the
Azusa Street Revival of Los Angeles. In fact, Pentecostal Scholar and Historian Allan Anderson
writes,
“A revival began in Russia and Armenia in 1855, with people speaking in tongues, but was
soon limited to a group in the Black Sea area who called themselves Pentecostal Christians.
In 1880, an experience of Spirit baptism was received by a group of Armenian
Presbyterians who began to fellowship with the Russian Pentecostals. An eleven-year old
Russian boy had prophesied in the 1855 revival about coming Turkish invasions and the
Russian and Armenian Pentecostals started leaving for North America from 1900 to 1912.
They formed Pentecostal congregations there that had predated the classical denominations
in origin by fifty years.” 36
One person by the name Gregory Peshtimaljian needs recognition as a type of John
Baptist that prepared the way for the American missionaries’ message. Arpee writes concerning
him, “That the period of the evangelical movement is closely associated with the name of
Gregory Peshtimaljian, the famous principal of the patriarchal academy. The reform movement
in the Armenian church before the year 1839 owed its existence in large measure to this man’s
influence.” Peshtimaljian, it cannot be argued was influential in bringing reform and laying the
foundation for the evangelical movement. So, passionate was he in his criticism of contemporary
35
Arpee, 109.
36
Allan Anderson, “An Introduction to Pentecostalism: Global Charismatic Christianity”.(Cambridge, United
Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2004) pg 24-25.
11
Orthodox Church that he once said, “When God created man, he made him in his own image, but
man has now reversed the order, and endeavors to make God in man’s image”.37 It seems that
evangelicals in Armenia appreciated this man. Nevertheless, he died not understanding them.
Arpee writes, “Peshtimaljian looked sometimes with dismay at what he considered to be foolish
What can we observe from the growth of evangelicalism in America to Armenia? Firstly,
the pattern of growth for the evangelical movement seems to be rooted in peoples
from the book of Acts, these were the same practices emphasized by the Jewish Christian
movement and Apostles of the 1st Century. Evangelicals assume like them (Romans 1:14-17)
that preaching evangelical gospel truths will lead to victorious conversions of the heathen and
life to the dead professing believer.40 Secondly, evangelical growth can be attributed to
“activism” and protesting against formalism, traditionalism, and disregard of essential truths by
high churches. A classic example of this is observed in the American Missionaries response to
“Let there be so many and so good schools established in the nation, that ours shall
not only cease to attract attention, but shall become unnecessary and be wholly forsaken.
Let there be so much and so good preaching in all the various churches that no one will
ever think of coming again to hear us stammer in a foreign tongue. Should he, or any other
person, again ask how long we are going to stay, and how much longer they will have to
bear with us, show them Isa 6:11,12 and say that when the prophet asked, “how long” he
should prophesy, the Lord said, “Till the land be an utter desolation, and the inhabitants be
37
Arpee, 104.
38
Arpee, 105.
39
Bebbington, 3.
40
Chopourian, 30.
12
removed far away;” but that we, by the grace of God, were going to stay and prophesy till
the land should be greatly blessed, and the people brought very nigh and made very happy
as “heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ.”41
In fact, this dissenting element is probably the greatest contribution for its growth. Like
Protestantism in Germany under Luther’s leadership, the common person could relate to their
dissent, admire their courage and evangelical message of God’s redemption.42 As Lewis writes,
Armenian leaders felt the need for reform and a return to “sola scriptura” in their state-church.
Their response to the Armenian Apostolic Church persecutors reveals this priority and their
,”….although we are commonly called Protestants. However, we again declare that we are
Armenians by nations, Christians by faith, and obedient subjects of the Ottoman
government. Nevertheless, if in religious or civil matters we be in error-for we do not claim
to be infallible-we gladly admit it, if you will deign to point out error to us. You well know
that the conviction of the human mind is effected only by the presentation of truth, not by
the exercise of force; and in the fear of God we can do nothing against our conscience.”44
Lastly, for us to understand the growth of the evangelical movement we must consider the socio-
political climate the Armenians and Armenians received their message. In fact, according to one
author, evangelicalism in America was potent due to its ability to respond to social disruption.45
41
Arpee, 111. It is ironic that the negative promise of this prophecy to Isaiah was fulfilled. Around 1890 the
Ottoman Turks began a systematic effort to kill, displace, and claim Armenian land as their own. Historians
regard this as the “Armenian Genocide”. If the genocide was a fulfillment of God’s judgment or a random act evil
is theologically unknown. Nevertheless, the spiritual state of Armenians has remained the same or degenerated
into passive skepticism due the influence of communism from Russia.
42
Leon Arpee, “The Armenian Awakening a History of the Armenian Church, 1820-186” (Chicago, Illinois: The
University of Chicago Press, 1909) pg.104.
43
Lewis, 33.
44
Arpee, 120-121.
45
Noll, 155.
13
In Armenia, the evangelical message promised satisfaction in the midst of political uncertainty.
In fact, Sultan of Turkey would not have headed the voice of European ambassadors who pushed
for religious tolerance if it were not for the political troubles in his Empire.46
Conclusion
We can see from the research that there seems to be some clear patterns of behavior with
evangelicals and social realities amongst the recipients of their ministry that tend to guarantee the
46
Chopourian, 109.
14
Bibliography
Arpee, Leon. The Armenian Awakening a History of the Armenian Church, 1820-1860. Chicago,
Illinois: The University of Chicago Press, 1909.
Bebbington, D.W. Evangelicalism in Modern Britain New York, NY: Routledge, 2002.
Chopourian, Giragos H. The Armenian Evangelical Reformation Causes and Effects. New York,
NY: The Armenian Missionary Association of America, Inc, 1970.
Lewis, Donald M. Christianity Reborn the Global Expansion of Evangelicalism in the Twentieth
Century. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Erdmans Publishing, 2004.
Noll, Mark A. The Rise of Evangelicalism: The Age of Edwards, Whitefield and the Wesleys.
Downers Grove, Illinois: Intervarsity Press, 2003.
Tootikian, Vahan H. The Armenian Evangelical Church. Detriot, Michigan: Armenian Heritage
Committee, 1981.
15