Role of Human capital theory on UK universities

2011

1.0.

Introduction

Education is important for any individual to improve their knowledge and skills to participate fully and efficiently in economic and social developments of a society. Education is directly related to ones country over all development in ages of Adam Smith. Education and training [should] enable people in an advanced society to compete with the best in the world. (NCIHE, 1997) Universities play a significant role in providing high quality of education to society. Universities in United Kingdom had a successful journey throughout the history of Morden education. And in recent years there has been an unpredicted rise in the number of students enrolling for higher/tertiary education compared to past. According to BBC News 2010, there was about 481,854 accepted applicants in 2009, 25,227 more than 2008 - an increase of 5.5% overall. While there was 8.7% rise in number of applicants than the previous year. The admissions service, UCAS, noted a particularly large rise (15.3%) in applicants aged 25 and over. It also said the number of accepted applicants had gone up by 44% since 1999. Its always an individuals choice when it comes for choice of higher education (HE). The importance of investment in HE is explained Human capital theory, emphasising on Labour market, Rate of returns, and other factors influencing HE.

The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen

Page |1

Role of Human capital theory on UK universities

2011

2.0.

Human Capital Theory

Human capital is in general represents the investment people make on themselves that enhance their economic productivity. Adam Smith, 1776 defined human capital as Fourthly, of the acquired and useful abilities of all the inhabitants or members of the society. The acquisition of such talents, by the maintenance of the acquirer during his education, study, or apprenticeship, always costs a real expense, which is a capital fixed and realized, as it were, in his person. Those talents, as they make a part of his fortune, so do they likewise that of the society to which he belongs. The improved dexterity of a workman may be considered in the same light as a machine or instrument of trade which facilitates and abridges labour, and which, though it costs a certain expense, repays that expense with a profit. The theoretical framework most responsible for the wholesome adoption of education and development policies has come to be known as human capital theory. According to Fagerlind and Saha, (1997) human capital theory (HCT) provides a basic justification for large public expenditure on education both in developing and developed nations. Raise in number of students enrolling in universities of UK can be explained with help of human capital theory (HCT). However economic evaluation of educational investment projects should take into account certain criteria according to Psacharopoulos and Woodhall (1997) which are: Direct economic returns to investment, in terms of the balance between the opportunity costs of resources and the expected future benefits; Indirect economic returns, in terms of external benefits affecting other members of society; The private demand for education and other factors determining individual demand for education; The geographical and social distribution of educational opportunities; and, The distribution of financial benefits and burdens of education.

The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen

Page |2

Role of Human capital theory on UK universities

2011

3.0. Economic returns

3.1. Direct Economic returns

Direct economic returns are mostly concerned with individuals who opt for higher studies. They can be valued through earnings premium and rate of returns. Studies show that countries with higher levels of education and skills have on average higher levels of productivity and economic growth (Machin and Vignoles 2005). Individual tries to read the current labour market situation since entering into higher studies is sacrificing present earning against the investment in learning. Educational attainment is strongly linked to average earnings. According to OECD 2010, in UK, graduates of tertiary education earn more overall than upper secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary graduates their earnings are 153% of the earnings of people at the lower level of education. At the other end of the education scale, people who have not completed upper secondary education earn only 78% of what those with upper secondary or post-secondary non tertiary education earn as shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Earning figures for various education levels of individuals (OECD Countries, 2011)

The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen

Page |3

Role of Human capital theory on UK universities

2011

According to OECD 2010 Annual tuition fees for HE for a student in UK costs about $5000 USD with about 50 to 55% of financial aids available in various forms of loans, transfers and scholarships it is easy for a student to make an investment based on willingness and ability of studying. Rewards are typically higher for individuals attaining HE than upper secondary education or postsecondary nontertiary education HE brings substantial rewards in most countries, generating a net financial return over a mans working life of more than USD 350 000 and USD 152 858 for a woman, as on Table 2.

Table 2: Financial returns over mans life time (OECD Countries, 2011)

The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen

Page |4

Role of Human capital theory on UK universities

2011

3.2.

Indirect Economic returns

For the public sector, the costs of education include direct expenditures on education (such as paying teachers salaries), public-private transfers, and lost tax revenues on students foregone earnings. Economic benefits of educational flow are not only for individuals but also for government when these individuals enter into labour market in form benefits like increased revenue from income taxes and social insurance payments on higher wages as well as a lower need for social transfers. These public returns, which take into account the fact that providing education is also a cost to governments, offer an additional perspective on the overall returns to education (Walter W. McMahon, 2009). The net public return from an investment in HE exceeds USD 95,318, accounting for the main cost and benefits at this level of education. This is almost triple the amount of public investments made in tertiary education and as such, provides a strong incentive for governments to expand HE. Higher level of education in a wider concept helps the society indirect ways E.g.; better educated individuals generally have better health, which lowers public expenditure on National Health Service. Also, their earnings premium means they spend more on goods and services, which have wider economic benefits.

The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen

Page |5

Role of Human capital theory on UK universities

2011

Table 3: Public and Private Benefits from education (OECD Countries, 2011)

The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen

Page |6

Role of Human capital theory on UK universities

2011

1.0.

Demand for Education (Labour Market)

As the World is getting more competitive every employer looks out more productivity with quality and efficiency which can be an outcome of investment on education/ educated graduates. Demand for education always exists in the labour market, although employability in the labour market is mostly where the supply of educated individuals meets the demands where they must meet various educational attainments. According to the labour force survey of UK 2010, after the onset of most recent recession, the un-employment rate for new graduates was 20% in the third quarter of 2010. This was the highest unemployment rate for new graduates in over a decade with almost 1 in 5 recent graduates. This was almost double the rate before the start of the recession, which stood at 10.6% and unemployment for around 1 in 10 recent graduates. By the end of the recession the rate for new graduates was 2.3 times higher (18.5% compared to 7.9%), as on Table 3.

Table 4: Graduate unemployment rates (Labour Market, ONS,2011)

The rate of unemployment rate is lowest for graduates who complete HE when its compared to that of persons who have a primary or secondary education which is about 40-45% and 25-30% respectively when compared with to that of graduates with HE which is about 20% as on Table 4.

The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen

Page |7

Role of Human capital theory on UK universities

2011

Table 5: Unemployment rates by age and qualifaction (Labour Market, ONS,2011)

Although hiring of tertiary graduates is high with the levels of education and relevant experience. Its convincible that the rate of employment is high for graduates with HE which has figures about 75 to 80%.

The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen

Page |8

Role of Human capital theory on UK universities

2011

4.0.

Individual demand for education

Individuals tend to take up HE not just for financial earnings but also for betterment of their life style. A study by the HE Funding Council for England (HEFCE) shows that Graduates are less depressed, healthier, more likely to vote in elections and help with their children's education, The also shows advantages that graduates derive from HE cover not only better jobs and higher pay, but also a wide range of other social and personal benefits. On average, graduates are less likely to smoke, are less obese, have a higher sense of well-being, and read more to their children. They are also more likely to hold more tolerant attitudes towards other races, and are more likely to be involved in their communities through voluntary activities. They also cost society less. They are less likely to require social security benefits, and their healthier lifestyle places less burden on the National Health Service.

The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen

Page |9

Role of Human capital theory on UK universities

2011

5.0.

Financial distributions

As there was financial reforms announced in England for HE on 2004 which was further reformed in 2007 helped out more students to take up HE. From these reforms poorest students gain the most, due to generous increases in maintenance grants and subsidies outweighing the total increase in the costs of entering university relative to the system that was replaced. HE reforms do in fact include a substantial insurance component. There are no longer any exemptions for fees based on parental income. Instead of being payable upfront, all fees are now deferrable until after graduation, with loans available at a zero real interest rate, repayable according to income (at 9% above a threshold of 15,000) (Dearden et al, 2005) and (Dearden et al, 2007).

The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen

P a g e | 10

Role of Human capital theory on UK universities

2011

6.0.

Conclusion

Education is one of the biggest assets of any country which aims for development of society. This has been borne in mind of most government and also individuals who share in that society. Form convincing evidence provided that individual with higher education have a higher earning premium and higher rate of returns attracts more students to take up higher education while the labour market in UK also supports this statement by providing more employment opportunities to educated individuals is another positive aspect to gain a higher education. And its always common that individuals with better education gain more social benefits and enjoy better healthy lifestyle with more leisure time and incomes to spend. While Government supporting more cause of studies in financial forms and the reforms in higher education in 2007 have significantly helped students at lower end enrol in further education whilst there was a prediction in raise in tuition fees by the year 2012 triggered more number of students to enrol into higher education.

The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen

P a g e | 11

Role of Human capital theory on UK universities

2011

Reference

BBC News Channel, Gary Eason. 2003. Record applicants accepted at UK universities in 2009. [ONLINE] Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/8472071.stm. [Accessed 29 April 11].

Beard R. and Hartley, J. (1984). Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. London: Harper and Row.

Dearden, L., Fitzsimons, E., Goodman, A. and Kaplan, G. (2006). Copula v ARMA models of earnings dynamics, mimeo, Institute for Fiscal Studies.

Dearden, L., Fitzsimons, E., Goodman, A. and Kaplan, G. (2007). HE student support funding, IFS Press Release, 23 July.

Donald R. Winkler , R, 2009. The social benefits of higher education. 1st ed. USA: Office of the Vice President-Planning: University of California

Fagerlind, A. and Saha, L.J. (1997) Education and National Developments. New Delhi. Reed Educational and Professional Publishing Ltd.

Gary S. Becker (1962, 1993, 3rd ed.). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Chicago, University of Chicago Press Yossi Shavit, Richard Arum, Adam Gamoran, Gila Menachem, R, 2007. Stratification in higher education: a comparative study. 1st ed. USA: Stanford University Press

The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen

P a g e | 12

Role of Human capital theory on UK universities

2011

Harrison, D. (1988). The Sociology of Modernization and Development. London: Unwin Hyman.

Higher Education Funding Council for England. 2003. News > 2003 > 7 April 2003. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/news/hefce/2003/benefit.htm. [Accessed 29 April 11].

Lorraine Dearden, Emla Fitzsimons, Alissa Goodman and Greg Kaplan, A, 2010. Higher Education Funding Reforms In England: The Distributional Effects And The Shifting Balance Of Costs. The Economic Journal, 118, 1-26.

NCIHE (1997) Higher Education in the Learning Society: Report of the National Committee. London: HMSO. Available at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ncihe/

Machin, S. and A. Vignoles. (2005). Whats the Good of Education?: The Economics of Education in the UK, Princeton University Press: Princeton and Oxford.

OECD (2011). Education at a Glance : OECD Indicators 2010. Paris, OECD Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.

OECD, UK, 2011. Persistence of High Unemployment: What Risks? What Policies?. OECD Economic Outlook, 2011/1, 1-36

Office for National Statistics. 2010. Labour Market. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=1162. [Accessed 29 April 11].

Psacharopoulos, G and Woodhall, M. (1997) Education for Development: An Analysis of Investment Choice. New York Oxford University Press.
The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen P a g e | 13

Role of Human capital theory on UK universities

2011

Seth A. Agbo, A, 2011. Myths and Realities of Higher Education as a Vehicle for Nation Building in Developing Countries: The Culture of the University and the New African Diaspora. Education Journal, 18/22, 8-19.

Smith, Adam: An Inquiry into the Nature And Causes of the Wealth of Nations Book 2 - Of the Nature, Accumulation, and Employment of Stock; Publishers London: Methuen & Co., Ltd. 1776.

Walter W. McMahon , 2009. Higher learning, greater good: the private and social benefits of higher education. 1st ed. USA: The John Hopkins University Press p181204

The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen

P a g e | 14