Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
An
attempt
at
a
concise
summary
of
the
ongoing
Hawaiian
antics
of
Dr.
Orly
Taitz,
Esq
Dr.
Orly
Taitz,
Esq
v.
Loretta
Fuddy
and
Dr.
Alvin
Onaka
Circuit
Court
for
the
First
Circuit,
State
of
Hawaii
Civil
Case
11-1-1731
Petition
for
a
Writ
of
Mandamus
and
Request
for
Inspection
of
Records
Under
United
Information
Practices
Act,
Statute
92F,
State
of
Hawaii
NOTE: This document contains several links to Dr. Orly Taitzs website. Dr. Taitzs website has been known to trigger malware warnings on several occasions, and is often blocked by net nanny and safe browsing software. Click on links at your own risk. NOTE: Due to the highly unpredictable nature of Taitzs legal antics it can often be difficult to figure out which case she thinks she is arguing. Her default setting on those rare and special occasions when she gets to perform her art in front of a judge seems to be all of them. As a result, this timeline includes all of her known interaction with Hawaii State agencies, Hawaii State courts, the Federal District Court for Hawaii, and any filing in any other court that attempts or has attempted to compel or coerce the Hawaii Department of Health into doing anything at all. Also included are references to any and all relevant court or administrative hearing rulings. This is based on the theory that it is likely that Orly will attempt to reference some or all of these activities/events/filings/imaginary animals during any future hearing or court filing. NOTE: Where possible, information has been drawn from public records. However, there are cases where (unfortunately) the best available information consists of statements made by Orly Taitz. Dates of actions that Orly claims to have been taken should be viewed as approximations, at best. Reader beware. Acknowledgements: Im grateful to the members of The Fogbow for their suggestions following the publication of the first draft of this document, and their encouragement throughout the sanity-taxing task of assembling it.
Timeline
of
Events:
22
April
2011:
President
Barack
Obama,
acting
through
his
personal
attorney,
requests
that
the
Hawaii
Department
of
Health
make
an
exception
to
policy
and
allow
him
to
obtain
certified
copies
of
his
long
form
birth
certificate.
Obamas
attorney
flies
to
Hawaii
to
obtain
the
copies1
25
April
2011:
Hawaii
Director
of
Health
Loretta
Fuddy
signs
a
letter
to
the
President
granting
his
request,
and
stating
that
she
personally
witnessed
the
copying
of
the
documents.1
27
April
2011:
President
Barack
Obamas
long
form
birth
certificate
is
released
to
the
press
at
a
White
House
press
conference.
1
4
May
2011:
Orly
Taitz
writes
a
four
page
letter
to
Dr.
Alvin
T.
Onaka,
Hawaii
State
Registrar
&
Chief,
Office
of
Health
Status
Monitoring,
Hawaii
Department
of
Health.
The
letter
is
captioned
as
a
Request
Of
Access
To
Records
Under
Hawaii
Uniform
Information
Practices
Act
of
1975.
The
letter
contains
a
litany
of
accusations
relating
to
the
birth
certificate
released
days
earlier
by
the
White
House,
and
concludes
by
demanding
access
for
Taitz
and
her
(as
yet
unnamed)
experts
to
personally
inspect
the
original
birth
record.
Taitz
also
demands
that
Onaka
answer
a
number
of
questions.
Although
Taitz
gives
the
name
of
the
statute
she
is
relying
on,
she
does
not
cite
to
any
specific
section
or
subsection
of
the
statute.2
7
May
2011:
Orly
Taitz
sends
a
letter
to
Hawaii
Director
of
Health
Loretta
Fuddy
demanding
access
to
inspect
President
Obamas
birth
certificate
under
Hawaiis
Uniform
Information
Practices
Act
(UIPA).
This
request
is
similar,
but
not
identical,
to
the
UIPA
request
sent
to
Dr.
Onaka
three
days
earlier
requesting
the
same
access
to
the
same
information.
In
this
letter,
Taitz
states
that
she
is
attaching
a
a
certified
copy
of
the
original
Certificate
of
Live
Birth
of
one
Susan
Nordyke
as
Exhibit
2.
Exhibit
2
actually
appears
to
be
a
photocopy
or
a
scan
of
a
certified
copy
of
the
Nordyke
birth
certificate,
not
an
actual
certified
copy.
This
may
indicate
that
Dr.
Taitz
has
some
difficulty
in
understanding
the
difference
between
certified
copies
and
photocopies.3
19
May
2011:
Dr.
Onaka
replies
on
behalf
of
himself
and
Dr.
Fuddy
to
Taitzs
3
May
and
7
May
UIPA
demands.
Citing
Hawaii
Revised
Statute
(HRS)
92F-13(4),
he
points
out
that
Hawaii
UIPA
does
not
require
the
disclosure
of
records
when
disclosure
is
protected
by
1
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/04/27/president-obamas-long-form-birth- certificate
2
A
copy
of
this
letter
was
included
within
Exhibit
5
of
Orlys
original
complaint
in
Taitz
v.
Fuddy,
and
can
be
seen
at:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/64159576/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-et-al- HI-CIR-CT-Exhibits-4-7-to-Complaint-64118717
3WARNING:
site
at
following
link
may
contain
malware.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=21476
Mike Dunford 2012. All Rights Reserved.
What
the
Hell
Does
Orly
Think
Shes
Doing
in
Hawaii
other
State
laws.
He
refers
Taitz
to
HRS
338-18,
which
prohibits
the
Department
of
Health
from
disclosing
vital
records
to
anyone
other
than
those
who
have
a
tangible
interest
in
the
document.
He
also
specifically
refers
Taitz
to
HRS
338-18(b),
which
provides
the
listing
of
parties
considered
to
have
a
direct
and
tangible
interest.
Dr.
Taitzs
UIPA
request
is
denied
in
full.4
24
May
2011:
Orly
Taitz
mails
a
(fatally
defective)
subpoena
to
Loretta
Fuddy.
The
subpoena
in
question
demands
that
Fuddy
submit
to
a
deposition
at
10:00
am
on
27
June
2011,
and
that
Fuddy
permit
Taitz
and
as
yet
unnamed
experts
to
inspect
Barack
Obamas
original
birth
certificate
at
10:00
am
on
27
June
2011.
The
subpoena
is
nominally
tied
to
one
of
Taitzs
FOIA
cases
in
Washington
DC,
Taitz
v
Astrue
(USDC,
District
of
Columbia,
case
#
11-cv-00402-RCL).
The
subpoena
in
question
was
issued
from
the
DC
District
Court
instead
of
the
Hawaii
District
Court,
and
was
signed
by
Orly
Taitz
even
though
Taitz
has
not
been
admitted
to
practice
in
Washington
DC.5
26
May
2011:
Orly
Taitz
mails
a
(fatally
defective)
subpoena
to
Loretta
Fuddy.
This
time,
the
subpoena
demands
that
Dr.
Fuddy
produce
Barack
Obamas
original
birth
certificate
for
inspection
at
10:00
am
on
29
June
2011.
The
subpoena
is
nominally
tied
to
one
of
Taitzs
FOIA
cases
in
Washington
DC,
Taitz
v
Astrue
(USDC,
District
of
Columbia,
case
#
11-cv- 00402-RCL).
This
subpoena
is
issued
from
the
USDC,
District
of
Hawaii.
As
was
the
case
with
the
previous
subpoena,
this
one
was
signed
by
Orly
Taitz
even
though
Taitz
has
not
been
admitted
to
practice
in
Hawaii.
6
4
June
2011:
Orly
Taitz
sends
a
UIPA
request
to
Dr.
Fuddy.
This
UIPA
request
demands
a
certified
copy
of
the
original
long
form
birth
certificate
for
Virginia
Sunahara,
who
was
born
on
4
August
1961
and
died
the
following
day.
Although
Dr.
Taitz
has
included
a
copy
of
this
letter
in
the
exhibits
to
one
or
more
court
filings,
the
Hawaii
Department
of
Healths
denial
of
this
request
does
not
appear
to
have
been
alleged
as
a
cause
of
action
in
any
of
them,
and
the
remedies
that
Dr.
Taitz
has
been
seeking
from
the
court
in
the
action
based
on
the
denial
of
her
UIPA
requests
do
not
include
receiving
access
to
the
Sunahara
birth
certificate.
7
4
A
copy
of
this
letter
was
also
included
within
Exhibit
5
of
Orlys
original
complaint
in
Taitz
v.
Fuddy,
and
can
be
seen
at:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/64159576/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-et- al-HI-CIR-CT-Exhibits-4-7-to-Complaint-64118717
In
a
demonstration
of
the
care
and
attention
to
detail
that
are
characteristic
of
Dr.
Taitzs
legal
efforts,
the
response
from
Onaka
actually
appears
within
exhibit
5
first,
with
the
actual
request
following
the
response.
5
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56229377/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-Invalid-Subpoena-Issued-by- Orly-Taitz-to-Loretta-Fuddy
6
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56475811/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-INVALID-SUBPOENA-2- ISSUED-BY-ORLY-TAITZ
7
A
copy
of
this
letter
was
also
included
within
Exhibit
5
of
Orlys
original
complaint
in
Taitz
v
Fuddy,
even
though
it
appears
to
have
little
or
no
connection
to
the
other
documents
included
in
that
exhibit.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/64159576/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-et-al-HI- CIR-CT-Exhibits-4-7-to-Complaint-64118717
Mike Dunford 2012. All Rights Reserved.
What
the
Hell
Does
Orly
Think
Shes
Doing
in
Hawaii
8
June
2011:
Orly
Taitz
sends
another
letter
to
Dr.
Onaka.
Taitz
titles
this
letter,
Request
for
administrative
agency
review.
In
the
letter,
she
states
that
she
is
sending
the
letter
as
part
of
the
required
pre-litigation
steps
of
requesting
agency
review
of
my
appeal
of
your
decision.8
13
June
2011:
Hawaii
Deputy
Attorney
General
Jill
Nagamine
sends
Orly
Taitz
a
letter.
The
letter
references
the
two
defective
subpoenas
issued
by
Taitz
(see
entries
for
24
May
11
and
26
May
11).
Ms.
Nagamine
notes
that
the
subpoenas
were
not
issued
or
served
in
accordance
with
the
Federal
Rules
of
Civil
Procedure.
Ms.
Nagamine
goes
on
to
say
that
even
if
a
subpoena
were
to
be
issued
in
accordance
with
FRCP
guidelines,
Hawaii
State
Law
prohibits
the
disclosure
of
the
information.
Taitz
is
told
that
she
will
need
to
receive
a
court
order
from
a
court
of
competent
jurisdiction
before
she
can
be
given
access
to
Mr.
Obamas
birth
certificate.9
5
July
2011:
Orly
Taitz
mails
a
new
subpoena
to
Ms.
Loretta
Fuddy.
This
subpoena
is
similar
to
the
one
mailed
on
26
May,
with
two
noteworthy
exceptions:
it
sets
8
August
2011
as
the
new
date
for
production
of
the
documents,
and
it
is
signed
by
a
Deputy
Clerk
of
the
Court,
Federal
District
Court,
District
of
Hawaii.
10
8
July
2011:
Orly
Taitz
files
a
Motion
to
Compel
in
the
Federal
District
Court,
District
of
Columbia.
This
motion
is
not
an
attempt
to
compel
compliance
with
the
subpoena
Taitz
had
mailed
on
5
July.
Instead,
it
is
an
attempt
to
compel
compliance
with
the
subpoena
Taitz
had
mailed
on
26
May.
The
motion
included
a
statement
by
Taitz
claiming
that
the
Federal
District
Court,
District
of
Columbia
is
a
court
of
competent
jurisdiction
for
the
purposes
of
HRS
338-18.
11
14
July
2011:
In
a
post
on
her
blog,
Orly
Taitz
complains
that
Deputy
Attorney
General
Nagamine
is
not
returning
her
phone
calls.
In
this
blog
post,
Taitz
suggests
that
her
followers
call
both
Ms.
Nagamine
and
Director
of
Health
Loretta
Fuddy
to
demand
that
they
comply
with
Taitzs
subpoena.
12
27
July
2011:
Orly
Taitz
sends
Loretta
Fuddy
a
letter
via
FedEx.
The
letter
was
marked
Personal
and
Confidential,
and
is
available
to
the
public
via
Taitzs
website.
In
this
letter,
Taitz
demands
that
Dr.
Fuddy
advise
her
if
Hawaii
will
comply
with
the
5
July
2011
subpoena,
and
that
Dr.
Fuddy
do
this
no
later
than
the
close
of
business
on
29
July
2011.
Taitz
does
not
specify
whether
she
means
the
close
of
business
in
California,
or
the
close
of
8WARNING:
site
at
following
link
may
contain
malware.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=22573
9
http://www.scribd.com/doc/57878406/Letter-to-Orly-Taitz-From-Hawaii-AG-Re- Subpoena-BC-Cannot-Be-Provided-Per-HI-State-Law
10
http://www.scribd.com/doc/59432402/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-USDC-D-C-Subpoena-Issued- to-Loretta-Fuddy-3
11
http://www.scribd.com/doc/59789284/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-USDC-D-C-22-MOTION-to- Compel-by-ORLY-TAITZ-gov-uscourts-dcd-146770-22-0
12
WARNING:
Site
at
following
link
may
contain
malware.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=23807
Mike Dunford 2012. All Rights Reserved.
What
the
Hell
Does
Orly
Think
Shes
Doing
in
Hawaii
business
in
Hawaii.
In
this
letter,
Taitz
informs
Dr.
Fuddy
that
because
Taitz
is
aware
that
Dr.
Fuddy
is
represented
by
counsel,
Taitz
mailed
the
subpoena
to
the
attorney
instead
of
actually
serving
it
on
Dr.
Fuddy.
Taitz
asks
Dr.
Fuddy
to
tell
her
if
Dr.
Fuddy
and
Dr.
Fuddys
attorney
have
been
in
contact
with
each
other
regarding
the
subpoena,
and
if
so
what
decision
they
have
reached.
13
6
August
2011:
According
to
birther
blog
Obama
Release
Your
Records
(ORYR),
Jerome
Corsi
announces
that
he
is
working
hard
to
get
some
competent
Hawaii
attorneys
to
buttress
Taitz
when
Taitz
arrives
at
the
Hawaii
Department
of
Health
on
8
August
to
attempt
to
force
compliance
with
her
as-yet-unserved
subpoena
from
5
July.14
This
local
counsel
is
subsequently
identified
as
Hawaii
Republican
Senate
candidate
and
attorney
John
Carroll.
15
8
August
2011;
~10:00
HST:
Orly
Taitz
arrives
at
the
Hawaii
Department
of
Health,
accompanied
by
alleged
document
authentication
experts
Paul
Irey
and
Doug
Vogt.16
Taitz
is
met
at
the
entrance
to
the
Department
of
Health
by
Deputy
Director
for
Health
Keith
Yamamoto
and
Special
Assistant
to
the
Attorney
General
Joshua
Wisch.
Taitz
is
denied
access
to
the
birth
certificate
and
is
given
a
letter
signed
by
Deputy
Attorney
General
Jill
Nagamine
that
outlines
the
Department
of
Healths
position.17
Wisch
offers
Taitz
a
chance
to
properly
serve
the
subpoena
on
the
Department
of
Health.
Taitz
declines.18
Local
Attorney
John
Carroll
arrived
near
the
end
of
all
of
this
and
attempted
to
assist
Taitz.
Taitz
advised
him
that
the
only
assistance
she
needed
consisted
of
directions
to
the
Federal
Courthouse.16
8
August
2011;
~1130
HST:
Orly
Taitz
proceeds
from
the
Hawaii
Department
of
Health
to
the
Federal
Courthouse,
accompanied
by
her
alleged
experts.
Alleged
expert
Irey
is
unable
to
enter
the
building
due
to
an
expired
ID,
so
only
alleged
expert
Vogt
accompanies
Taitz
to
the
Clerks
office.
Taitz
files
an
Emergency
Ex
Parte
Motion
to
Show
Cause
and
to
Compel
Attendance
for
Production
of
Documents
and
for
Attorneys
Fees
and
Costs.
Taitz
demands
13
WARNING:
Site
at
following
link
may
contain
malware:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?iframe&paged=142
14
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/08/dr-corsi-obamas-connecticut- social.html
15
This
identification
was
not
made
until
late
November,
when
Carroll
was
identified
as
the
local
attorney
assisting
in
another
(unrelated)
birther
lawsuit.
http://www.thefogbow.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=6913#p311809
16
A
brief
firsthand
account
of
this
episode
can
be
found
at
http://www.thefogbow.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=5421&start=3725#p273791
17
A
copy
of
the
letter
was
included
as
Exhibit
A
to
the
Declaration
of
Jill
Nagamine
that
was
filed
with
the
States
Opposition
to
Taitzs
efforts
to
force
Hawaii
to
comply
with
Taitzs
defective
subpoena.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/64159809/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-et-al-HI- CIR-CT-Attachment-to-MtD-Declaration-of-Jill-Nagamine-64117099
18
http://www.scribd.com/doc/64160047/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-et-al-HI-CIR-CT-Attachment- to-MtD-Declaration-of-Keith-Yamamoto-64117104
Mike Dunford 2012. All Rights Reserved.
What the Hell Does Orly Think Shes Doing in Hawaii a hearing on 9 August.19 The Court gives her a 14 September 2011 hearing date20, and enters an order stating that the motion will be heard in the normal course of events. 21 Because the subpoena in question was issued based on the Taitz v Astrue case in the DC District Court, this motion is technically an extension of that case. 10 August 2011: Orly Taitz files suit against Director of Health Loretta Fuddy and Registrar Alvin Onaka. (Taitz v Fuddy). The complaint is filed in Hawaii State Circuit Court for the First Circuit. Taitz titles her complaint, Petition for a Writ of Mandamus Request for Inspection of Records Under United [sic] Information Practices Act Statute 92F, State of Hawaii.22 Taitz attempts to serve her complaint by having copies mailed to Fuddy and Onaka, with a courtesy notice sent to Deputy Attorney General Jill Nagamine.23 The proof of service Taitz submits to the court includes photocopies of certified mail receipts demonstrating that something was mailed to all three, but only includes photocopies of return cards for Fuddy and Onaka.23, 24 22 August 2011: Instead of filling out an online form, Orly Taitz files a motion in Federal District Court, District of Hawaii, requesting access to the online filing system. She believes this will make it easier for her to file additional documents related to her pending Motion to Compel.25 A hearing on this motion is set for 30 August 2011. 24 August 2011: Hawaii files their opposition to Taitzs Motion to Compel.26 This is the State of Hawaiis response to the motion Taitz filed in Federal Court in Hawaii, and is part of the Taitz v. Astrue case in the DC District Court. It is not directly connected to the Hawaii State Court case Taitz filed.
19
http://www.scribd.com/doc/61883778/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-USDC-HAWAII-1-1- Attachments-1-RECAP-Emergency-Ex-Parte-Motion-for-Emergency-Order-to-Show-Cause- and-to-Compel-Attendance-for
20http://www.thefogbow.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=5421&hilit=orly+fuddy+sub poena&start=3650#p273689
21http://www.thefogbow.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=5421&hilit=orly+fuddy+sub poena&start=3700#p273754
22
http://www.scribd.com/doc/64159273/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-et-al-HI-CIR-CT-COMPLAINT- 64118680-Taitz-v-Fuddy-Compl
23
http://www.scribd.com/doc/64159718/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-et-al-HI-CIR-CT-Summons- and-Proof-of-Service
24
This
was
noted
by
Judge
Rhonda
Nishimura
during
a
subsequent
hearing.
25
http://www.scribd.com/doc/62943437/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-USDC-HI-5-REQUEST-for- ECF-Number-by-Orly-Taitz-Gov-uscourts-hid-98266-5-0
26
http://www.scribd.com/doc/63062252/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-USDC-HI-9-0- MEMORANDUM-in-Opposition-to-Plaintiff-s-Emergency-Ex-Parte-Motion-Gov-uscourts- hid-98529-9-0
Mike Dunford 2012. All Rights Reserved.
What the Hell Does Orly Think Shes Doing in Hawaii 30 August 2011, morning: US District Court, District of Columbia Chief Judge Royce Lamberth issues an order dismissing Taitz v. Astrue.27 30 August 2011, morning: US District Court, District of Columbia Chief Judge Royce Lamberth issues an order denying the Motion to Compel that Taitz filed in his court on 8 July. Lamberth predictably declines to attempt to issue an order compelling Hawaii officials to release the birth certificate, and points out that, the requested birth certificate has nothing to do with this case.28 30 August 2011, afternoon: A hearing is held in the Federal District Court, District of Hawaii, on Taitzs motion to be granted electronic filing privileges. Taitz appears for this hearing by telephone; the State of Hawaii is represented by two Deputy Attorneys General who appear in person. Ms. Taitz receives detailed instructions from Chief Judge Susan Oki Mollway on how to fill out an online form. Hawaii Deputy Attorney General Jill Nagamine then informs Judge Mollway that the underlying case had been dismissed that morning. Taitz advises Judge Mollway that she intends to file a Motion for Reconsideration, and that she has no doubt that this motion will be granted. Judge Mollway reschedules the 14 September hearing on the Motion to Compel for 21 November 2011.29 2 September 2011: The State of Hawaii files a Motion to Dismiss in the Taitz v Fuddy case in State Court. In support of dismissal, the State cites Taitzs failure to properly serve the case, the fact that the Writ of Mandamus Taitz is requesting was abolished in the Circuit Courts of Hawaii in the 1970s, and the fact that Taitz is not entitled to the relief she is seeking as a matter of law. A hearing is set in front of Judge Rhonda Nishimura for 12 October 2011, at 8:30 am.30 20 September 2011: Taitz submits her reply to the States opposition to her Motion to Compel.31 This is part of the Federal Court proceeding in Taitz v Astrue. Although Judge Mollway provided Taitz with detailed instructions on how to obtain ECF privileges, the motion is filed via FedEx.32
27
http://www.scribd.com/doc/63579610/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-USDC-D-C-33- MEMORANDUM-OPINION-Signed-by-Chief-Judge-Royce-C-Lamberth-gov-uscourts-dcd- 146770-33-0
28
http://www.scribd.com/doc/63579991/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-USDC-D-C-35-ORDER-gov- uscourts-dcd-146770-35-0
29
http://www.scribd.com/doc/63842636/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-USDC-HI-OFFICIAL- TRANSCRIPT-8-30-11-HEARING
30
http://www.scribd.com/doc/64116181/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-et-al-HI-Cir-Ct-MOTION-TO- DISMISS-64115865
31
http://www.scribd.com/doc/65830612/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-USDC-HI-14-0-Plaintiff-s- REPLY-to-Loretta-Fuddy-s-Memorandum-in-Opposition-to-1-Plaintiff-s-MOTION-to- Compel-Attendance-for-Produ
32
WARNING:
Site
at
following
link
may
contain
malware:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=25608
Mike Dunford 2012. All Rights Reserved.
What the Hell Does Orly Think Shes Doing in Hawaii 2 October 2011: Taitz submits her opposition to the States Motion to Dismiss in Taitz v Fuddy.33 7 October 2011: Hawaii submits their reply to Taitzs opposition to their Motion to Dismiss in Taitz v. Fuddy.34 12 October 2011: A hearing is held on the State of Hawaiis Motion to Dismiss in Taitz v Fuddy. The hearing takes place before Judge Rhonda Nishimura, and lasts approximately 20 minutes. During the hearing, Taitz concedes that asking for a Writ of Mandamus might have been improper, given the abolition of that particular remedy several decades ago. She asks that the court instead treat her motion as an agency appeal. One of the several reasons given for granting dismissal is that the requirements for an agency appeal were not met. At the close of the hearing Judge Nishimura grants the States motion and dismisses the case. The State is ordered to prepare the Order.35 16 October 2011: Taitz sends a FOIA request directly to the office of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. In this request, Taitz demands access to all of President Obamas passport applications. Taitz cites Hawaiis refusal to give out copies of the Presidents birth certificate as part of the reason for this request. The fate of this FOIA request remains unknown at present.36 17 October 2011: Taitzs Motion to Reconsider in Taitz v Astrue is denied.37 19 October 2011: Hawaii Deputy Attorney General Jill Nagamine sends Taitz a copy of the proposed Order dismissing Taitz v Fuddy. Taitz is supposed to approve or object to the form of the order within five days.38 25 October 2011: Taitz files a Notice of Appeal in Taitz v Astrue. In this notice of appeal, she includes a request for a stay in order to allow her to have her hearing on her Motion to
33
http://www.scribd.com/doc/69637317/Taitz-v-Fuddy-HI1CC-Taitz-Opposition-to-MTD
34
http://www.scribd.com/doc/68396662/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-HI-CIR-CT-6-DEFTS- MEMORANDUM-IN-REPLY-TO-PLTF-S-OPPOSITION-TO-MTN-TO-DISMISS-PETITION-FOR- WRIT-OF-MANDAMUS
35
http://www.scribd.com/doc/71613967/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-HI-CIR-CT-CERTIFIED- TRANSCRIPT-OF-HEARING-10-12-11-Taitz101211
36
WARNING:
Site
at
following
link
may
contain
malware:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=26536
37
http://www.scribd.com/doc/69179304/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-USDC-D-C-39- MEMORANDUM-AND-ORDER-denying-36-Motion-for-Reconsideration-gov-uscourts-dcd- 146770-39-0
38
WARNING:
Site
at
following
link
may
contain
malware:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Letter-from-Nagamine- 10.19.2011.pdf
Mike Dunford 2012. All Rights Reserved.
What
the
Hell
Does
Orly
Think
Shes
Doing
in
Hawaii
Compel
that
is
scheduled
for
21
November
2011
in
front
of
Hawaii
District
Court
Magistrate
Judge
Richard
Puglisi.39
26
October
2011:
Citing
the
denial
of
the
Motion
to
Reconsider,
Hawaii
District
Court
Magistrate
Judge
Richard
Puglisi
vacates
the
21
November
2011
hearing
and
denies
Taitzs
motion
to
compel.40
26
October
2011:
Taitz
files
an
Emergency
Motion
for
Rehearing
in
Taitz
v
Fuddy.
In
this
motion,
Taitz
claims
(among
other
things)
that
she
had
fulfilled
the
requirements
for
an
agency
appeal.
Taitz
tentatively
schedules
this
hearing
for
16
November.
The
Court
schedules
the
hearing
for
30
November.41
3
November
2011:
Taitz
submits
a
document
to
the
United
States
Court
of
Appeals
for
the
9th
Circuit.
The
document
in
question
is
ostensibly
attached
to
the
Barnett|Keyes
v
Obama
case
that
had
been
argued
before
the
9th
Circuit
in
May.
The
document
requests
that
the
9th
Circuit
issue
a
Writ
of
Mandamus
directing
Hawaii
Director
of
Health
Loretta
Fuddy
to
permit
inspection
of
Barack
Obamas
birth
certificate.42
Misstatements
and
outright
lies
by
Taitz
in
this
document
spark
objections
from
the
US
Attorneys
assigned
to
the
case.43
This,
in
turn,
causes
Taitz
to
submit
a
slightly
modified
version
of
the
same
motion.
44
9
November
2011:
In
an
attempt
to
fulfill
the
requirements
for
an
agency
appeal,
Taitz
sends
the
Hawaii
Department
of
Health
a
Demand
for
Emergency
Agency
Hearing.45
10
November
2011:
The
Order
dismissing
Taitz
v
Fuddy
is
signed
and
filed.46
16
November
2011:
Hawaii
Deputy
Attorney
General
Jill
Nagamine
sends
a
letter
to
Taitz.
Nagamine
denies
Taitzs
9
November
request
for
an
agency
hearing.
Nagamine
reminds
Taitz
that
Taitzs
suit
is
not
about
the
authenticity
of
Mr.
Obamas
birth
certificate,
but
39
http://www.scribd.com/doc/70410160/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-USDC-D-C-40-NOTICE-OF- APPEAL-as-to-34-RECAP-Order-on-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment-by-ORLY-TAITZ-gov- uscourts-dcd-146770-40-0
40
http://www.scribd.com/doc/70454252/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-USDC-HI-15-ORDER- DENYING-PLAINTIFF-S-EMERGENCY-EX-PARTE-MOTION-FOR-EMERGENCY-ORDER-TO- SHOW-CAUSE-AND-Gov-uscourts-hid-98529-15
41
http://www.scribd.com/doc/71146731/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-et-al-HI-CIR-CT-Orly-Taitz- Petiton-for-Re-Hearing-11-30-11
42
http://www.scribd.com/doc/72045789/BARNETT-KEYES-v-OBAMA-APPEAL-9th- CIRCUIT-53-Filed-ECF-Appellants-TransportRoom-53-0
43
http://www.scribd.com/doc/71994656/BARNETT-KEYES-v-OBAMA-APPEAL-9th- CIRCUIT-52-1-TransportRoom-52-1
44
http://www.scribd.com/doc/72050778/BARNETT-KEYES-v-OBAMA-APPEAL-9th- CIRCUIT-54-1-Filed-ECF-Appellants-TransportRoom-54-1
45
http://www.scribd.com/doc/72482060/From-Orly-Taitz-s-Website-Emergency- Petition-Taitz-11-9-11
46
This
is
indicated
on
the
court
docket
for
the
case.
A
copy
of
the
order
is
not
currently
available
online.
Mike Dunford 2012. All Rights Reserved.
What the Hell Does Orly Think Shes Doing in Hawaii about the Department of Healths denial of access to the birth certificate. Nagamine concludes by informing Taitz that if Taitz persists in filing frivolous and vexatious requests to access President Obamas birth certificate the State will seek sanctions and attorneys fees.47 16 November 2011 (on or about)48: Taitz attempts to submit an Amended Motion for Rehearing in the Taitz v Fuddy case. This motion includes, as purported new evidence justifying reconsideration, the fact that Taitz and a number of New Hampshire citizens filed an action in New Hampshire challenging the placement of President Obama on the ballot for the 2012 Democratic Primary in New Hampshire. The Amended Motion also deletes a complaint about the court reporter from the 12 October hearing that was part of the original Motion for Rehearing.49 17 November 2011: Taitz submits a Motion for a Writ of Mandamus to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. This motion is ostensibly attached to Taitzs appeal in the Taitz v Ruemmler FOIA lawsuit. In this motion, Taitz requests that the DC Circuit direct DC District Court Chief Judge Royce Lamberth to order the Hawaii Department of Health to allow Taitz to inspect President Obamas original long form birth certificate.50 18 November 2011: Hawaii files its opposition to Taitzs original Motion for Rehearing. This opposition does not reference Taitzs Amended Motion, which has not been filed by this point, and which most likely had not yet been received by the State. In this filing, the State declares an intention to seek to recover attorneys fees and costs from Taitz, and requests that the Court formally find that Taitzs motion is frivolous.51 22 November 2011: Taitz posts an article to her blog which indicates that she believes that the hearing scheduled for 30 November will be a rehearing of her motion, rather than a hearing on her request for a rehearing.52
47
A
copy
of
this
letter
can
be
found
as
Exhibit
2
in
the
following
document:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/76281397/Taitz-v-Fuddy-Zibits-Rep-MTR-Opp
48
The
exact
date
for
this
event
is
uncertain,
as
the
amended
motion
either
did
not
reach
the
court
or
was
not
docketed
due
to
the
lack
of
any
Hawaii
rule
permitting
motions
to
be
amended.
49
http://www.scribd.com/doc/72851843/From-Orly-Taitz-s-Website-TAITZ-v-FUDDY- Hi-Cir-Ct-Amended-Motion-for-Rehearing
50
http://www.scribd.com/doc/73752992/IN-RE-ORLY-TAITZ-ET-AL-U-S-COURT-OF- APPEALS-D-C-CIRCUIT-Petition-for-Writ-of-Mandamus-Transport- Room?in_collection=3358536
51
http://www.scribd.com/doc/73601243/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-HI-CIR-CT-11-DEFENDANTS- MEMORANDUM-IN-OPPOSITION-TO-PLFT-S-EMERGENCY-MOTION-FOR-REHEARING- MOTION-TO-STAY-FINAL-ORDER-PEN
52
WARNING:
Site
at
following
link
may
contain
malware:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=28168
Mike Dunford 2012. All Rights Reserved.
10
What the Hell Does Orly Think Shes Doing in Hawaii 29 November 2011: Taitz files, on behalf of herself, several residents of Hawaii, several residents of New Hampshire, and others, a lengthy request for an emergency hearing with the Chief Elections Officer of Hawaii. Although not directed to any court of law, the challenge apparently includes a complaint under sections of the Hawaii Revised Statutes that relate to voter fraud. In addition to requesting changes to Hawaiis administrative rules pertaining to elections, Taitz demands an evidentiary hearing, and requests that the Chief Elections Officer order production of Obamas birth certificate (in hardcopy and microfiche format), all of Obamas immigration and naturalization and passport records, and Obamas original Social Security Card application.53 29 November 2011: Taitz files her reply to the States opposition to the Motion for Rehearing in Taitz v Fuddy. In this reply, Taitz points out that the State has opposed her original motion, but not the (still not docketed) amended version. Taitz therefore requests that the Court find that the State therefore has conceded the points raised in the amended motion for rehearing, and that the court therefore order that Taitz be given access to the birth certificate.54 30 November 2011: A hearing is held before Judge Nishimura on Taitzs original Motion for Rehearing. Taitz makes several attempts to argue her Amended Motion instead of the original. Taitz is reminded, several times, that there are no provisions for amending motions, and that a new hearing would need to be set on the amended motion. Taitz is also informed, several times, that anything she wants to argue must be included in the written motion. After attempting to raise new evidence discovered the previous day, Taitz is also informed that new evidence cannot be added after the motion has been filed. Taitz ultimately withdraws the original motion so that she can file and argue the amended version as a new motion.55 5 December 2011: Hawaii Chief Elections Officer sends Taitz a very brief letter denying Taitzs 29 November demand for an emergency hearing.56 6 December 2011, 3:40 pm: Taitzs Amended Motion for Rehearing is filed in Hawaiis 1st Circuit Court. Despite her allegations of new evidence discovered on 29 November, the Amended Motion filed on 6 December is identical to the one she attempted to file on or about 16 November. A hearing is set for 6 January 2012, at 9:00 am.57
53
WARNING:
Site
at
following
link
may
contain
malware:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=28426
54
http://www.scribd.com/doc/75005308/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-HI-CIR-CT-Orly-s-Reply-to- Opposition-to-Amended-Motion
55
http://www.scribd.com/doc/76186157/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-HI-Cir-Ct-Certified-Transcript- Hearing-Held-Nov-30-2011-tfb
56
WARNING:
Site
at
following
link
may
contain
malware:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=28665
57
http://www.scribd.com/doc/76295160/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-HI-CIR-CT-Amended- Emergency-Motion-for-Rehearing
Mike Dunford 2012. All Rights Reserved.
11
What
the
Hell
Does
Orly
Think
Shes
Doing
in
Hawaii
6
December
2011,
3:41
pm:
Taitzs
Emergency
Motion/Request
for
the
Court
to
Docket
Amended
Motion
for
Rehearing
is
filed
in
Hawaiis
1st
Circuit
Court.
This
appears
to
be
a
request
that
Judge
Nishimura
order
the
clerks
to
file
the
amended
motion
for
rehearing.
(See
entry
for
6
December
2011,
3:40
pm.)58
12
December
2011:
Taitz
apparently
attempts
to
gain
access
to
inspect
President
Obamas
original
long
form
birth
certificate
and
the
original
1961
microfiche
roll
containing
a
copy
of
the
birth
certificate
by
issuing
a
subpoena
to
Hawaii
Director
of
Health
Loretta
Fuddy
to
provide
evidence
and
testimony
in
a
case
Taitz
has
pending
before
an
Administrative
Law
Court
in
the
State
of
Georgia.
The
subpoena
purports
to
attempt
to
compel
Dr.
Fuddy
to
submit
to
a
deposition,
to
be
taken
in
Fuddys
own
office,
on
5
January
2012.59
This
subpoena
appears
to
bear
the
signature
of
the
judge
in
the
case,
but
is
actually
a
pdf-format
blank
form
that
can
be
readily
downloaded
from
a
website.60
16
December
2011:
Hawaii
submits
its
Opposition
to
Tatizs
Amended
Motion
for
Rehearing.
They
again
indicate
that
they
will
be
seeking
attorneys
fees
and
costs,
and
again
ask
that
Judge
Nishimura
formally
find
that
Taitzs
pleading
is
frivolous.61
21
December
2011:
Taitz
attempts
to
gain
access
via
subpoena
to
the
original
birth
certificate
for
Virginia
Sunahara.
This
subpoena
is
issued
in
Taitzs
pending
Administrative
Law
proceeding
in
Georgia.62
29
December
2011:
Taitz
apparently
attempts
to
file
a
Motion
for
Reciprocal
Subpoena
Enforcement/Motion
to
hear
in
conjunction
with
the
scheduled
motion
on
January
6,2012
[sic].
This
appears
to
be
an
attempt
to
have
Judge
Nishimura
order
enforcement
of
the
subpoenas
Taitz
has
attempted
to
issue
in
the
Georgia
Administrative
Law
proceeding.
Taitz
claims
that
these
subpoenas
that
she
personally
filled
out
and
issued
constitute
grounds
under
HRS
338-18(9)
for
Judge
Nishimura
to
grant
the
Motion
for
Reconsideration
of
the
dismissal
of
the
UIPA
request
that
Taitz
filed
for
the
same
documents
many
months
before
Taitz
filled
out
the
online
subpoena
forms,
printed
them,
and
mailed
them
to
Hawaii.63
As
of
2
January
2012,
there
is
no
indication
that
this
motion
has
been
docketed.
30
December
2011:
Taitz
posts
a
copy
of
her
reply
to
Hawaiis
opposition
to
Taitzs
Amended
Motion
for
Reconsideration.
On
Page
13
of
this
filing,
Taitz
states
that
Hawaii
58
http://www.scribd.com/doc/76295058/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-HI-CIR-CT-Emergency- Motion-Request-to-Docket-Amended-Motion-for-Rehearing
59
http://www.scribd.com/doc/75515549/Loretta-Fuddy-Hawaii-DOH-Subpoena-For- Obama-Birth-Certificate-and-1961-Microfiche-Roll
60
http://www.thefogbow.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=6845&start=475#p316316
61
http://www.scribd.com/doc/76346646/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-HI-CIR-CT-Defendant-s-Reply- to-Plaintiff-s-Amended-Emergency-Motion-for-Rehearing
62
WARNING:
Site
at
following
link
may
contain
malware:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=29459
63
http://www.scribd.com/doc/76723408/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-Hi-Cir-Ct-For-Writ-of- Mandamus-Motion-for-Reciprocal-Subpoena
Mike Dunford 2012. All Rights Reserved.
12
What the Hell Does Orly Think Shes Doing in Hawaii Deputy Attorney General Jill Nagamine sent her a letter stating that Dr. Fuddy will not be submitting to the demands that Taitz made in the subpoenas that Taitz filled out as an alleged part of her Georgia Administrative Law proceeding.64 2 January 2012: Taitz puts a post on her blog declaring that she is expecting a surprise witness to appear at the 6 January 2012 hearing that is scheduled on Taitzs second attempt at an Emergency Motion for Rehearing in Taitz v Fuddy.65
64
http://www.scribd.com/doc/76793662/TAITZ-v-FUDDY-HI-CIR-CT-Reply-to- Opposition-to-Emergency-Morion-for-Rehearing-and-Stay-12-29-11
65
WARNING:
Site
at
following
link
may
contain
malware:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=29952
Mike Dunford 2012. All Rights Reserved.
13