Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Search Documents
Explore
Documents
Books - Fiction Books - Non-fiction Health & Medicine Brochures/Catalogs Government Docs How-To Guides/Manuals Magazines/Newspapers Recipes/Menus School Work + all categories Featured Recent
People
Authors Students Researchers Publishers Government & Nonprofits Businesses Musicians Artists & Designers Teachers + all categories Most Followed Popular
Shuja Rehman
Home My Documents My Collections My Shelf View Public Profile Messages Notifications Settings Help Log Out
Welcome to Scribd - Where the world comes to read, discover, and share...
Were using Facebook to give you reading recommendations based on what your friends are sharing and the things you like. We've also made it easy to connect with your friends: you are now following your Facebook friends who are on Scribd, and they are following you! In the future you can access your account using your Facebook login and password. Learn moreNo thanks Some of your friends are already on Scribd:
Zoom Out Zoom In
/ 18
the costs associated with an ERP system when theyfirst commence the implementati on. The
benefits are usually well understood. The Vendor will make sure of this. The costs do not surface until
well into the implementati on - andwhy should the Vendor talk to an organisation about the costs and
difficulties when theyare trying to make a sale? On the surface, there are very attractive reasons for
More "automation" of tasks Generic Costs and ImpactsThe costs and impacts are understandab
then ever talked about or even imagined. Weare yet to hear from an organisation who have implemented
the "toy box effect" can take over. Userssee all the functionality available and suddenly they want it
manually and what is doneby the system will swing dramatically after implementati on. Many
more tasks willbe automated. Automation will significantly reduce the flexibility of how
youoperate as a business.
Users need to become more computer literate. Many see this as personallycha
llenging even beyond their ability and will not cope, or leave the company.
The word "Enterprise" in ERP means that whatever happens in one area has aripple effect in other areas.
Understandin g the implications of actions of one area,on other areas of the company, is not something
that happens overnight. Trainingtends to focus on how do I do my job. It should also focus on what are the
dy remembering where they put it. The information needs to be put intothe system or there will be
a domino effect. E.g. Stock is moved from location Ato location B and the information is not put into
the system. The system will tellsomeone to get the material from A and when it is not there, they have to
golooking. At the same time it is telling someone else to put new material in B, butB is full. The first
person finds the original material in B and logs it into thesystem. We now have double the quantity in
the system again and it doesn'treorde r. And so it goes on and everyone is blaming the system.
ERP systems tend to replace old systems. As such it is a quantum leap for allareas of the company. It is replacing
the trusty Ford with a high performanceF errari. This happens at a Technical level as well as a Business
consistently. No longer are we able to do something oneway in one branch and another way in another
branch. The system is going todetermine how we do things in all locations. Even within one location,
specialtreatm ent may not be possible any more without changing the configuration of thesystem. If the system
says you can either have 0, 15, 30 or 60 day credit terms,you can no longer offer 45 day terms without changing
configuration. If consistency can be implemented, there is good potential for cost savings as wellas getting rid of
Corporat e Culture
All the points above
contain technical issues or business issues which can be managed if they are identified
soon enough. Training can show people the impact of their actions inother areas. QA programs can focus on quality of
data. What most managers who havebeen through an ERP implementati on, will tell
you, is the biggest impact is on "CorporateCul ture". It is always underestimat ed and never overestimate
works. The focus, decision making process, attitude tostaff, stability, etc.Both feed
off one another. Job applicants who feel aligned with the way the organisationw orks and comfortable
with the style of person who interviews them, will likely get thejob, and perpetuate the
Culture.To successfully take on an ERP system, an organisation needs to change it's "CorporateCul
ture". It may need to change from being highly flexible and not paying a lot of attention to
consistency or accuracy, to one of being almost obsessed with detail. Of being prepared to have
Business Practices that are actually adhered to rather than justbeing documented and forgotten.
People need to change from focusing on turnover tofocusing on profit. ERP makes profit far more measurable
down to Department,C ustomer and Material level. Staff need to change their focus from their own job, to the whole
organisation. What theydo in their area has impacts in places they may never have envisaged. None of this
iseasy, and in many cases will be unachievable. Some people will not be prepared to make
the change and will either leave of their own volition or be asked to leave. This is the costof ERP.Another
dimension to "Cultural Change" is the timeframe in which the change is to bemade. It basically
needs to happen over a few days. One week you can bend all the rulesand get away with it; next week
the system will not let you. No matter how much trainingand preparation takes place, it cannot
prepare many people for reality. That is not to saythe preparation should not take place. The
preparation will ease the pain, not take it allaway. The more preparation the less the pain. On the positive side,
some people will taketo the system like the proverbial duck to water. These people tend to be (but not
all are)younger, newer employees who have had experience in other organisations. They knowthe
benefits of a good system and are frustrated with the current one. They will jump atthe chance to
Change Management is about setting expectations that lessen the pain of change. Peopleinvolve
d in a change expect to go from A to B. Perhaps where they are actually going isto C. Change Management
is about getting them used to the idea that C is the realdestinatio n.To give an example, any new system
is bound to have teething problems. If users expectthat all is not going to run smoothly on day 1, and
that they may be working back late for the first week because of problems bedding in the new
system, they are less likely toreject the system when it does go wrong. On the other hand telling staff that this
is goingto be a great new system with no problems can only lead to disappointme nt and rejectionwhe
not a complicated process. Properly managed, we cansee how people feel about the changes over
a period of time, and how they shift in their expectat ions. The results of money spent on change
management can be seen. Not puttingin the effort before implementati on, will cost an organisation
after implementati on. Whatis the cost to an organisation of a system that is forced upon people, and with
which theyfeel little ownership? They will either sink it, or ensure it never reaches it's potential.Eith
er way, the organisation will never get the return on investment it imagined.
ERP's was carried out recently. Itidentified "10 Common Causes of Disaster".
www.projectp erfect.com.au
. Tel.: (+92)(333)-(5122435) akistan g (ERP) plays a significant role
in todays enterprisee that includesors Support and Trust uted out of that 71. The study concludes that rest of the
critical success factors has atable to the user, and so on if t, finance,y. This is primarily. This study is
on.. Larsen and Myerson on critical success factors (CSFs)l ventures implementatio n projects and concluded that, criticale of a supporter,
top management support, high-s it is vital to develop key IT capabilities of the end usersll t. Zhang et al, (2002) stated that user
involvement refers to. ERP implementatio non variable considering importance based on literature.y
s. Training users to effectively . These critical factors s are made according to the culture of res in respective
organization that use diversified ERPd for data analysis concluding the response rate to 65%. tion of enterprise
resources applications . This correlation ent for change, prior usage and ease of usee in the study of Jiang Yingjie
t commitment and User intentionts for . s. All other critical factors were found significant predictors of . Based on the
Findings and conclusions of this research study it is s. Further research can be carried out by including the
ge in the postnet era:e, Journal of Strategic Information, Greenwich).ng a manufacturin gd usefulness, perceived ease
arrangement of how the resources of aecasted. ERP solutions have really minimized the extra delay and
unavoidabl eded organization but also have a prime concern with web technologies to the
engthen your brand, balancing market and your organization and minimizin gare
development. Our main function in the ERP is to integrate all theartments and functions of the company
yr o v i d e s you with these functions : e all the information regarding the customers
Pari Jan
Related Documents
PreviousNext 1.
p.
p.
p.
2.
p.
p.
p.
3.
p.
p.
p.
4.
p.
p.
p.
5.
p.
p.
p.
6.
p.
p.
p.
7.
p.
2 p.
27 p.
18 p.
2.
8 p.
8 p.
Add a Comment
Upload a Document
Search Documents
Follow Us! scribd.com/scribd twitter.com/scribd facebook.com/scribd About Press Blog Partners Scribd 101 Web Stuff Support FAQ Developers / API Jobs Terms Copyright Privacy