You are on page 1of 3

Pergamon

Ekctmchimica Vol.39. 4.pp.497-499.1994 Acta, No. Copyri&tt Q 1994 Elsevier Scicna Ltd. Printed GreatBritain rights in AU mewed 0013~4686/94 + 0.00 56.00

THE CONVERSION OF ISOSAFROLE TO PIPERONAL AND ANETHOLE TO ANISALDEHYDE: ELECTROCHEMICAL ACTIVE MANGANESE DIOXIDE
JAMES GRIMSIUW* and
CHENG HUA

School of Chemistry, Queens University, Belfast BT9 5AG, U.K. (Received 2 August 1993; in revisedform 27 September 1993) A&met-Non-stoichiometric manganese dioxide prepared electrochemically at room temperature and suspended in dilute sulphuric acid is used to oxidise isosafrole to piperonal in 54% isolated yield. The manganese dioxide-manganese@) sulphate system can be recycled electrochemically at high current density. It has the further advantage that water-soluble materials derived from the chemical oxidation step can be removed by filtration at the manganese dioxide stage. Direct oxidation of isosafrole at a lead dioxide anode leads to further oxidation of the piperonal. Key words: oxidation, manganese dioxide, isosafrole, piperonal, anethole.

INTRODUCTION Piperonal (2) has wide applications as an intermediate and in the formulation of fragrance and fla-

vouring materials. The only technical scale source is from isosafrole (1) by chemical oxidation. One large scale process[l] uses chromium(V1) as the oxidant and is unsatisfactory because of the associated environmental problems. Ozone can be used as the oxidising agent[2] but this process requires the careful control of reaction temperatures (0-5C). A number of workers have looked for a satisfactory electrochemical process for both this conversion and the related conversion of anethole (4) to anisaldehyde (5). Conversion of isosafrole to piperonal has been reported in a two-stage electrochemical process[3]. In the first stage, a bromine-mediated reaction leads to the diol (3) which is cleaved in a second electrochemical stage. Mediated, one-stage, electrochemical oxidation of isosafrole has been achieved with a ruthenium(IV) oxide-ruthenium(I1) mediator[4] and also with a cerium(IV)~erium(III) mediator[5]. The direct electrochemical oxidation of anethole as a suspension in aqueous sodium sulphate has been examined at a lead dioxide anode[6]. Anisaldehyde was obtained together with a substantial amount of anisic acid. Mediated oxidation by manganese(III)-manganese(I1) converts anisole to anisaldehyde but the process requires 55% sulphuric acid to stabilise the manganese(II1) species[7-j. We decided to carry out a careful investigation of the oxidation of both anethole and isosafrole at a lead dioxide anode with the objective of obtaining a more satisfactory yield of the aldehydes than previously achieved. The work was extended to an examination of the mediated electrochemical oxidation of isosafrole using manganese salts and low con*Author
addressed. 491 to whom all correspondence should be

centrations of sulphuric acid. In early references,[g 91, electrochemically generated manganese(II1) sulphate was used in weakly acid solution for the oxidation of organic substrates. The reagent hydrolyses to a brown precipitate which, in the recent literature[lO], is believed to be a hydrated manganese dioxide. Our objective was to prepare this active manganese dioxide in such a way as to minimise the amount of sulphuric acid which is discharged at the end of the process.

EXPERIMENTAL 1. General directions Preparative electrochemical experiments were carried out at constant current. A Pye-Unicam gas chromatography instrument was used for product analysis, fitted with a carbowax-20M column (9m x 4mm ID) at 200C and a flame ionization detector. Retention times: anethole, 3 min; anisaldehyde, 5.2 min; isosafrole, 4 min (two peaks due to cis- and truns-isomers); piperonal, 9.5 min. Where the reaction mixture was homogeneous, small samples (5ml) of the anolyte were taken for GLC and the organic products isolated with ether. Where the anolyte was not homogeneous, the whole product was extracted with ether. Ether extracts were concentrated to a standard volume and a standard amount injected onto the GLC column. Calibration was carried out with solutions of known concentration. 2. Direct electrochemical oxidations Cylindrical beaker cells were used. The lead sheet anode and nickel foil cathode were arranged symmetrically and only one surface of the anode (area 20 or 100cm3) was considered for calculation of current density. Anolyte and catholyte were separated with a diaphragm of porous pot. Lead dioxide anodes were prepared by subjecting the lead anode to a constant current (500Amm2) for

498

J. GIUM~HAWand C. HUA

30-45 min in 1 M sulphuric acid until a uniform and stable brown layer was formed. The cathode was nickel foil in an undivided cell. (a) An&role (4). Anethole (3.1 g, 0.0215 mol) was dissolved or suspended in electrolyte (150ml). Reaction was performed at room temperature with vigorous stirring. Samples were taken at intervals for GLC control. When conversions were essentially complete the solvent was partly removed under reduced pressure, the products isolated with ether and washed with sodium carbonate, respectively. Anisaldehyde was identified by GLC and ir spectroscopy. (b) Isosufrole (1). Isosafrole (2.43 g, 0.0150 mol) was dissolved or suspended in the electrolyte (150ml) and oxidised as for the previous example. 3. Indirect oxidation by electrolytic dioxide
manganese

Active electrolytic manganese dioxide was prepared from a solution of manganese sulphate tetrahydrate (45 g, 0.2 mol) in 2 M sulphuric acid (SOOml) at a lead anode (current density 2 x lo3 Am-, total charge passed 2.2Fmoll). This was achieved in a FM01 electrolyser (from ICI Ltd.) using a nickel cathode in 2M sulphuric acid and a two compartment arrangement with nafion membrane. The product formed a black sludge which was collected by filtration. On a smaller scale, this product was obtained in an individual beaker cell with lead anode and stainless steel cathode. A mixture of isosafrole (1.9 g, 0.015 mol) and manganese dioxide prepared from manganese sulphate (0.18mol) was stirred with 2M sulphuric acid (1OOml) for 14 h at 60C. The reaction mixture was filtered hot and the aqueous and solid phases washed with chloroform. The chloroform layer was separated, washed with sodium carbonate solution and water, dried and the solvent removed to leave crude piperonal (1.15 g), recrystallised from warm water as colourless crystals (0.95g, 54%), m.p. 3738C. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

density, cu. 10 Am-. Chemical yields of anisaldehyde are satisfactory but the process is not efficient in terms of charge consumption and passage of up to 19 Faraday per mole is required. Results are summarised in Table 1. Sodium sulphate and sodium carbonate are suitable electrolytes. On the basis of these results, an attempt was made to improve the yield of piperonal from the direct electrochemical oxidation of isosafrole. Sodium carbonate in 25% ethanol as electrolyte was unsatisfactory as the anode became poisoned after about 6 h and pitting corrosion set in. Oxidation at lead dioxide in dilute sulphuric acid proceeded without deterioration of the anode surface for a period of over 20 h. However, in all cases the yield of piperonal reached a maximum and then began to fall before all the isosafrole had been consumed. Reactions were monitored with time and Table 2 records conditions close to the time of maximum yield of piperonal. Changes in piperonal concentration during run no. 13 are given in Fig. 1. The consumption of piperonal by further oxidation is unacceptably rapid and it is unlikely that direct electrochemical oxidation at lead dioxide will be a satisfactory route to piperonal. 2. Oxidation using manganese dioxide Manganese dioxide prepared electrochemically at room temperature forms a finely divided precipitate which will oxidise isosafrole. The wet reagent is

Charge passed F / ml

isosafrole

1. Direct electrochemical oxidation The direct electrochemical oxidation of anethole is best carried out in aqueous alcohol at low current
Table 1. Oxidation Faraday/MO1 anethole 4.5 9.8 3.1 13.6 11.1 18.7 17.8 2.8

Fig. 1. Yield of piperonal from the oxidation of isosafrole in a divided cell at a PbO, anode, area 20cm. Current .____ density 500 Am- *, initial is&.afrole concentration 100 mM, anolyte of 25% ethanol, 75% 0.5 M sulphuric acid, anolyte volume 150 ml.

of anethole to anisaldehyde % yield anisaldehyde 15 42 11 trace trace 85 81 15

Run No. 1* 2 3* 4* 2; ::

Current/A 0.045$ 0.044$ 0.455 0.455 0.050$ 0.10% 0.09% 0.10%

Time/h 58.4 110.0 4.5 17.5 128.6 107.8 102.6 18.2

Solvent Hz0 EtOH.H,O Hz0 Hz0 HOAc.H,O MeOH-H,O HOAc-H,O EtOH-H,O

Electrolyte Na,SO, (0.5 M) Na,SO, (0.3 M) Na,SO, (0.6 M) NasSO, (0.6 M) NaOAc (0.38 M) Na,CO, (0.33 M) Na,SO, (0.3 M) NaOAc (0.3 M)

% Conversion 50 99 20 10 16 100 100 32

(1: 2)

(1: 4) (1:2) (1:2) (1:4)

Conditions: Each reaction employed 0.0215mol anethole in 15Oml solvent. * Pb anode, Ni cathode, undivided cell, room temperature with vigorous stirring. t Performed Pb/PbO, anode, Ni cathode, divided cell, room temperature with vigorous stirring. Current density: t 10Ame2, $lOOAm-*. Remarks: The anode surface eventually became blocked by a thick, soft layer.

Conversion of isosafrole to piperonal and anethole to anisaldehyde Table 2. Oxidation of isosafrole to piperonal Current Density Run No.
9

499

Current
IA 0.50 0.60

Time*
/h 22.4 20.0

Faraday/m01
isosafrole* 28 30

%
conversion* 49 50 % yield 21 24

/Am- 100 200

10

11 12 I3

300 400 500

0.75 0.80 1.00

16.0 15.4 12.6

30 31 31

z 60

28 32 35

Conditions: Each reaction employed 0.015mol isosafrole in solvent (15Oml) of 25% ethanol,
75% 0.5 M sulphuric acid, temperature 18C, preformed Pb/PbG, in a divided cell. Remarks: * Value at the point of maximum yield of piperonal. anode and nickel cathode

non-stoichiometric in composition with a ratio of available oxygen to total manganese content corresponding to MnO,., . Piperonal is obtained in 54% yield from the reaction with an excess of oxidising agent suspended in dilute sulphuric acid. The aqueous phase from this reaction contains manganese(R) ions which can be converted electrochemically to the active oxidising agent and thus dioxide-manganese(I1) reused. The manganese system has been used in this way for the oxidation of Cmethoxytoluene to anisaldehydec 111. The oxidation of isosafrole by electrolytically prepared cerium(IV) sulphate has been described in the literature[5] and gives piperonal in 83% yield. More recently, methanesulphonic acid has been suggested as a better solvent than sulphuric acid for oxidations with cerium salts[12]. Any indirect oxidation process, where the reagent is recycled electrochemitally, must take into account the water soluble organic byproducts that are inevitably formed. In the case isosafrole, these byproducts will be derived from acetaldehyde and piperonal by further oxidation. Products retained in the aqueous phase which is sent for regeneration of the inorganic reagent will accumulate with each round of the process. Ultimately, some scheme has to be devised for their elimiThe manganese dioxide-manganese(I1) nation. system has a definite advantage here because the oxidant, manganese dioxide, is insoluble so that it can be separated by filtration and transferred to a clean solution for further reaction. CONCLUSIONS The oxidation of isosafrole with active manganese dioxide electrochemically prepared at room temperature gives a good yield of piperonal. The manganese reagent can be recycled electrochemically and water soluble organic byproducts can be eliminated by filtering the manganese dioxide. The process uses

dilute sulphuric acid and discharges a minimum of waste reagents. Activated manganese dioxide is well known as an oxidising agent in organic chemistry[13] where the reagent is usually prepared by reaction between manganese(I1) and permanganate. We believe that it will be worthwhile to explore the use of the electrochemically prepared and recycled reagent.

REFERENCES
1. N. T. Farinacci, US Pat., 2794813 (1957); C/tern. Abs. 51, 6572 (1957); A. V. Bogastskii, A. P. Antonov, Y. V. Gavyevich, V. V. Titor and V. Y. Kalashnikov, USSR Pat., 490793 (1975); Chem. Abs. 84,74254 (1976). 2. International Corporation, Brit. Pat., 1092615 (1967); Chem. Abs. 69, 2516 (1968); E. A. Blair, US Pat., 2916499 (1959); Chem. Abs. !U, 6650 (1960). 3. S. Torii, K. Uneyama and K. Ueda, .I. Org. Chem. 49, 1830 (1984). 4. J. M. Madurro, G. Chiericato, W. F. de Giovani and J. R. Romero, Tetrohedron Letters 29,765 (1988). 5. J. P. Millington and D. A. Hughes, Brit. Pat. Appln., 2165536 (1986); Chem. Abs. 105, 153052 (1986). 6. F. Fichter and A. Christen, Helv. Chim. Acta 8, 332 (1925). 7. S. Chidambaram, M. S. V. Pathy and H. V. K. Udupa, J. Electrochem. Sot. India, 17.95 (1968). 8. W. Lang, Ger. Pat., 166357 (1906); J.C.S. Abstracts 90, . 627 (1906). 9. W. Lang, Ger. Pat., 189178(1907); J.C.S. Abstracts 94, 350 (1908). 10. J. Ph. Petitnierre, Ch. Comninellis and E. Plattner, Electrochim. Acta 35,281 (1990). 11. J. P. Millinaton. A. R. Jones. D. A. Hushes and J. E. Trotman, Bht. UK Pat. Appht., 2164935-(1986); Chem. Abs. 105, 1,4728 (1986). 12. R. P. Krek and R. M. Spotnitx, US Pat., 4639298 (1987) and US Pat., 4670108 (1987); Chem. Abs. 106, 127956 (1987). 13. A. J. Fatiadi, Synthesis 65 and 133 (1976).

EA 39:4-c