Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
I. AGING IN AMERICA
“An Aging Population”
Gerontology- the social science of aging p.1
Geriatrics- medicine for elderly patients p.1
Generally (and this text) will use the age 65 to determine if a person is referred to as
elderly or old. P.2
Chronic Condition: a permanent or long term condition, such as diabetes, heart disease,
arthritis, or deafness, rise with age p.12
Acute Condition: a temporary departure from physical or mental well-being, decline with
age p.12
Because the general decline in physical vigor coupled with a greater incidence of chronic
illness affects the outlook of many elderly individuals, their physcological profile differs
from that of the younger population. Some experience a loss of self esteem and may
begin to feel dependant and less in control of their lives or experience a loss of mastry
over their environment. Page 13
Death can make an elderly persons problem moot . . . urgent to get to elderly clients
cases- the elderly who seek legal assistance need help now, not in the distance future or
when it is convenient for the lawyer- p.14
The elderly suffer more often from loss of mental capacity then any other age group
because they are susceptible to dementia, a generic term for decline in memory and
cognitive function sufficient to affect the daily life of an alert patient. P.15
In the past the answer for a patient who has dementia or who is incapacitated is a
guardianship p.15
In general the elderly poor are older, widowed, living alone, and female. There are also
many racial disparities in the elderly poor. Page 17
Elderly are often economically vulnerable because their cost of care often exceeds their
income. In particular, chronic illness increases an individual’s dependency and cost of
living. P.17
The impairments caused by chronic illness and the need for long term care increases
directly with age.
Some say long term care insurance could be a possible solution to these problems.
The elderly are vulnerable because they are often economically dependant on the non
elderly.- like a son or daughter, or government assistance page 18
The elderly find support in both formal and informal networks. The need for a formal
network is great when an elderly individual is functionally impaired or in poor health
with limited informal network resources. Formal support and resources are provided by
institutions, agencies, and their representatives. Page 18
Federal and state benefit programs provide a crucial margin of income and healthcare
access for many elderly persons, yet the continuation of these programs depends greatly
on the willingness of the non elderly to continue to assist the elderly. Page 18
To avert shortages in the social security trust fund, the current retirement age will
gradually rise until it reaches age 67 in the year 2022.
Because federal financial support of social services has been severely reduced, the
original mandate of the Older Americans Act to make assistance available to all older
people regardless of means has been subsumed in subsequent mandates to target services
to the neediest elders. Page 18
The great majority of the elderly who live in the community are linked into social support
networks that enable them to cope psychologically, emotionally, and physically with the
vagaries of life. Such support can range from help with household chores to intervention
on account of a health crisis. Page 19
Wives are four years younger on average than husbands, and because women outlive men
an average of seven years, married women can expect an average widowhood of eleven
years. The result is more years of dependence, economic deprivation, and
institutionalization. Page 19
The use of informal, non family support systems also depends upon the individuals
attitude toward self reliance, an attitude that is often culturally as well as indicivually
based. Page 20
8/20/07 Class
Elderly means 65 and older
Chronically age measures the passage of time
Personal Autonomy: the right of an individual to act independently to promote ends and
purposes that need to satisfy only the actor. P.23
Autonomy: elevates the rights of the individual over the wishes or opinions of others
because the autonomous individual acts only in response to his or her own values and
imperatives. P.23
To reduce elderly people’s dependency we must recognize and expand their rights. Page
23
Even a healthy aging individual experiences a decline in physical capabilities that results
in diminished autonomy. At a minimum, the elderly tire more easily. Page 24
As an initial reaction many individuals would endorse the general idea that the elderly
should be protected from the unkind vicissitudes of life. They should be protected from
economic want, poor health, abuse and neglect, social isolation, and anything else that
might detract from their lives. Page 24/25
The more we help the elderly the more we take away their autonomy.
There is a need to balance the right to be autonomous while protecting the elderly.
Lawyers, who should by training be sensitive to the balancing of competing values, have
a major role to play in the sorting out of the proper mix of protection and autonomy.
Page 25
Tension between the competing goals of autonomy and protection often arises in
questions of the elderly and the law. Typically policy makers must choose between cash
grants or special services such as homemaking programs which supply commodities or
meals on wheels. Page 25
Promoting autonomy requires permitting the elderly to live as they will, even if that
results in their exposing themselves to risks that society considers unwise. Emphasizing
protection means guarding the elderly from unnecessary risks even if that requires
overruling their wishes. Page 25
Economic security for the elderly retiree is not controversial; everyone is for it. Debate
centers not on the goal but on the means. Page 26
Whether in the form of greater federal benefits, such as increased social security
payments, or more assistance from state and local governments, such as property tax
relief or subsidized housing, the elderly have reaped a steadily increasing share of
governmental benefit programs. These benefits of course, are largely paid for by the
taxes of the young. Page 26
In the 1980’s, however, the public’s acquiesescent tone began to change as all levels of
government felt budget constraints, and taxpayers demanded lower taxes and more fiscal
discipline. Page 26
Some have begun to claim that the elderly are unduly favored under government aid
programs. Page 27
Social justice, such advocates argue, demands that the elderly lose their preferential spot
so that others more needy, such as children living in poverty, can be served. Page 27
Much of the impetus for the generational justice argument comes from a belief that many
of the elderly are reasonably financially secure and do not deserve the degree of
assistance that they receive. Certainly statistics show that the elderly poverty rate is
below the national average. Page 27
While some of the benefits enjoyed by the elderly came as a result of the concern of the
young for the well-being of the elderly, some are due to the elderly’s vigorous political
activity. Not only are the elderly more likely to vote than younger persons but they are
politically very well organized. Page 27
The two largest aid programs for the elderly, Social Security and Medicare, are available
without regard to need. The rich stand in line with the poor. Page 30
PAGE 30/31
Case one: Care and Feeding. The most familiar context in which questions of duty
between one generation and another arise is that of parents’ duties to care for their
children. Care and feeding for the most part is an easy part of care
Case two. Nursing and Elderly. In the above instance its obvious that parents have a
duty to care for their children. The obvious corollary is the duty that children may have
to care for their elderly parents. How far should this go? Do children have a duty to take
their elderly parents into their homes? Etc.
Case three: Social Security. The baby boomer generation has more people than both
generation x and generation y combined. Which means that members of generations x
and y will be required to pay a substantially greater share of current income for the social
security benefits of the baby boomers than the baby boomers paid for the social security
benefits of their parents and grandparents. Distributive justice: Is it fair for one
generation to bear a larger burden than another?
Case four: Legacies and Bequests. Intergenerational wealth transfers. Do parents have a
duty to save during their lifetimes and transfer some of this wealth to their children or
other descendants? As a matter of distributive justice, however, it might be argued that
intergenerational wealth transfers are unjust, insofar as they operate to perpetuate
inequalities of wealth and income.
AGE DISCRIMINATION
We all “know” that “discrimination” is bad. Yet the first dictionary definition of the word
“discriminate” is to make or perceive differences, which is a natural and possibly useful
act. Page 31
However, if age discrimination were always bad, how could we defend social security
retirement benefits that are limited to those ages sixty two or older? The answer, of
course, is that we find age discrimination very desirable when distributing governmental
benefits. In a large sense we approve of discrimination that favors the elderly (positive
discrimination) but condemn it if it disadvantages them (negative discrimination). Page
31
The elderly are selected as the favored group because old age has historically been
associated with economic need.
The elderly are favored because of our collective perception that they are a sympathetic
group who deserves our assistance. Page 31
Traditionally, the economic needs of the elderly have justified their special treatment.
Although Americans are not particularly sympathetic to the elderly poor, many of whom
seem “deserving.” Page 32
The countervailing attitude, however, is that the elderly ought to save for their old age.
After all, old age is not an unexpected event. Page 32
In short, the argument goes, elderly poverty is less a social problem than an example of
individual responsibility. Page 32
Social security benefits have always enjoyed a wide support because the public thinks of
them as something earned in the form of insurance rather than a welfare payment. Page
32
Are they a group who deserve special support, or are they more like those active, affluent
individuals so frequently portrayed in advertisements? The two views likely will never
be completely harmonized but will continue to be the yin and yang of the debate over
what is the proper public policy towards the elderly. Page 33
The elderly are not as healthy as the rest of the population. Page 33
The question is not whether society has cause to provide health care for the aged through
taxpayer subsidies. The arguments in favor are compelling though the precise mix of
personal responsibility to pay and public obligation are always up for debate. Page 33
Given the modest retirement incomes of the elderly with their need of costly medical
care, Medicare represents an attempt to safeguard the old from financial ruin in their later
years. Rather, the question is why the elderly are favored when only half of the poor are
eligible for assistance. Page 33
Should high tech medical intervention with high risks of failure and limited benefits with
success be limited? We need to identify assumptions about the value to society of an
extremely old person’s continued life and about the value of life for the very disabled. A
partial response of the law has been authorization for advance directives to enable the
patient to refuse treatment. The further responsibility of the law is to assure such
directives do not establish a standard for withholding potentially effective treatments
from the aged. Page 33
As the number of very elderly people grows, the need for long term care similarly
increases. Page 34
Medicare only covers about 5% of nursing home expenditures, which cost approximately
$60,000 annually for a single resident. Page 34
The ongoing question with regard to long term care is what portion of care should be
subsidized from public funds and what responsibility the individual should bear. Page 34
For the most part the issues are at the level of “I need” and “I can’t afford.” Though the
country has enacted massive medical aid programs for the elderly, it has not debated the
values upon which these programs rest. As a result complaints about the cost of
Medicare are trivialized into questions about the amount of physician and hospital
charges rather than about what is an appropriate share of our national wealth to devote to
medical care for the elderly. We quibble about the size of the Medicare deductible
instead of asking what medical care should be available to all who can benefit from it.
Page 34
When those benefits are withheld or disputed the beneficiary needs a lawyer. Page 35
In turn, benefits create entitlements, making lawyers happy about elderly having so many
benefits, because it gives then work!
As a result of their expanded knowledge of laws that effect the elderly many lawyers
have begun to call themselves elder law attorneys. Just as academics have begun to
organize courses around the legal needs or the elderly, “elder law attorneys” have
emerged to advertise their ability and willingness to serve an elderly clientele. Generally,
the practice of elder law centers on estate planning, Medicare and Medicaid, nursing
home placement and patient rights, planning for possible incompetencey, health care
decision making and right to die issues, and employment discrimination. Page 35
Ageism: an attitude- a negative evaluation that serves to orient individuals toward old
people as a group. P.36 aka a negative attitude towards old people as a group
They also may have a greater need for protective services to guard them from physical,
financial, or emotional abuse or self- neglect. On the other hand, various consumer
scams are more likely to target older persons with more resources. Page 39
The result is that every state bar now has an elder law group or section. Page 39
DEVELOPING EXPERTISE
A practitioner may also become a specialist in the field by doing pro bono work for
clients of such providers of health and social services to the elderly as senior centers,
Area agencies on aging, food banks, government advisory boards, public interest law
firms, nursing homes and hospitals. Page 39
FIRM STRUCTURE
Elder law three types of law “firms” p. 40:
1. Traditional firm: usually approaches elder law from its background in trusts
and estates, emphasizes financial and property management
2. Clearing house firm: offers expertise on community and social service
resources in addition to traditional legal assistance. It includes at least one
staff member, often a social worker or specially trained paralegal whose
function is to refer clients to service providers in the community.
3. Umbrella firm: also provides services beyond traditional legal counsel and
financial management. Monitors services, more individualized services
An attorney who specializes in the problems of the elderly is aware of their special needs
and issues and can, at a minimum, counsel the client to seek specified, non legal
assistance from identified sources. Page 41
The client with multiple, ongoing problems is the mainstay of the elder law firm. Page
41
Much speculation has surrounded the possibility of lawyers partnering and sharing fees
relative to divorce with psychologists and financial planners. Page 42
Under the MDP model, a client could discuss estate planning with an attorney, consult a
financial advisor within the same on investments, and then hire an in house accountant to
prepare a tax return. Page 42
The American bar association has resisted any steps in the direction of allowing non-
attorneys (except under specific and limited circumstances) to deliver routine legal
services to the public. Page 43
The concept of “unbundling” or discrete task legal representation seeks to make access to
legal services affordable by explicitly providing the client with the option of choosing a
single legal service. Page 43
An often discussed example is the client who engages in a lawyer for advice and
document preparation for a cause the client will argue pro se. Page 43
The rules of ethics for every bar call for competent, diligent and zealous representation.
Model rule 1.1 states that competent representation, for example, requires the knowledge,
skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.
The standards of diligence and zeal are no less problematic. The principle issue is likely
to be when the duty of diligence and the attorney client relationship ends. Page 44
It is wise to limit the scope of pre paid legal services to avoid hazards, by agreeing about
what types of claims are covered. Page 45
Once hired a paralegal must be trained in unfamiliar areas at firm expense. Page 46
Paralegals with a background in social services are particularly valuable in law offices
because their expertise compliments, rather than duplicates, the attorneys legal skills.
Page 46
In time, the case manager will develop cases with complex or intensive financial
management needs. Page 47
If a client’s assets are very substantial, financial management can be referred to a bank
trust department or other corporate fiduciary. Page 47
Initially, the most economic way to purchase services is through a consulting contract or
part-time department officer or financial planner. Page 47
The attorney either must be appointed as a fiduciary or must personally guarantee the
actions of the firm as fiduciary. Page 48
If more complex legal assistance is needed the attorney and client can negotiate a reduced
fee.
There are never enough volunteers, and those who do volunteer may be caught in a bind
between the time demands of paying clients and the needs of the pro bono client. Page
49
Pro bono and discount assistance also raises questions about the quality of service. Page
49
For example, the information gleaned from a thorough interview allows the attorney to
assess any financial or housing choices in terms of that client’s likely future. Medical
information may be important. Page 50
Clients with smaller estates are sometimes tempted to give away their assets in order to
qualify for Medicaid, although such action, if discovered by state authorities may cause
the client to be ineligible for benefits. Page 50
PRACTICAL CONCERNS:
o House calls
o Good, indirect lighting
o Some elderly people are suspicious of attorneys
o Some elderly may be confused or paranoid which may be the
direct result of medication
A VIEW FROM ADVANCED AGE
A sophisticated financial distribution plan may minimize taxes, maximize returns, and
avoid probate costs but also leave the elderly person with no more gifts to give and no
opportunities to stay involved in business or professional roles which were an important
part of that individual’s identity. Page 51
Lawyers must be cognizant of the stress of working with elderly clients who, perhaps
more than others, may fear their own mortality or feel anger, or regret at their experiences
and behavior. Page 51
The model rules consist of mandatory statements (the rules) that the attorney must abide
by or be subject to disciplinary action. Page 52
The attorney must, first, identify the client, who may be the elderly individual or other
family members (one or more of them). The attorney who undertakes to represent only
the elderly person must explain fully to other family members the limitations this will
impose on interactions with them, including the confidentiality if the attorney-client
relationship. Page 53
2 types of representation
Joint- when representing co-plaintiffs or co-defendants
and
Intermediation- one attorney representing two or more clients with potentially conflicting
interests. Page 59
A key factor in defining the relationship is whether the parties share responsibility for the
lawyer’s fee, but the common representation may be inferred from other circumstances.
Page 59
A lawyer acts as intermediary seeking to establish or adjust a relationship between clients
on an amicable and mutually advantageous basis. Page 59
Disadvantages inherent in the intermediary model include the absence of any external
check upon the fairness of the result, and the possibility that intermediation will result in
a compromise of individual interests that would not have occurred with individual
representation. Page 60
Additionally, should intermediation fail, each individual must seek new counsel.
A lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation of that client may be materially
limited by the lawyer’s responsibilities to another client or to a third party or by the
lawyer’s own interests, unless:
1. The lawyer reasonably believes the representation will not be adversely
affected, and
2. The client consents after consultation.
The attorney’s ability to represent various family members depends upon whether the
attorney can fulfill his or her obligations to each individual which include:
o Loyalty
o Competency and diligence
o Zealous advocacy
o Communication sufficient to enable the client
Husbands and wives may have different opinions and interests relating to a number of
estate planning decisions.
When an estate planner is asked to represent both a husband and a wife who have already
executed a prenuptial agreement, the existence of the agreement should alert the estate
planner that there are contractual obligations between the parties that may raise a
potential conflict of interest. Page 65
A lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation of that client may be materially
limited by the lawyer’s responsibilities to another client . . . . Unless:
1. The lawyer reasonably believes the representation will not be adversely
affected; AND
2. The client consents after consultation.
The aged are more likely to agree to mediation and accept any proposed settlement
because time is usually on the side of the opponent.
The mediators are neutral and work for the common good of all the people involved.
Any mental or physical condition of a client that renders him incapable of making a
considered judgment on his own behalf casts additional responsibilities upon his lawyer .
..
The lawyer also should always safeguard and advance the client’s interests.
The attorney only has two choices” advocate the express desires of the client, regardless
of how those desires are effected by the client’s disabled condition, or determine what the
attorney believes are the “best interest” of the client and advocate them, regardless of the
desires of the client. Page 68/69
The model rules promise to be more enlightening because they do include a rule
addressing the relationship between the lawyer and a client of questionable competency.
The rules reflect a trend since the 1970s to favor advocacy for the wishes of disabled
clients rather than the paternalistic, non adversarial role similar to guardian ad litem.
Recognizing that maintaining a normal client lawyer relationship “as far as reasonably
possible” may be insufficient, the rule continues:
The lawyer may take reasonably necessary protective action, including consulting
with the individuals or entities that have the ability to take action to protect the
client and in appropriate cases, seeking the appointment of a guardian ad litem,
conservator or guardian.
The lawyer is impliedly authorized under rule 1.6(a) to reveal information about
the client, but only to the extent reasonably necessary to protect the client’s
interests.
Lawyer can only request a guardian in limited circumstances- only when the lawyer
believes the client cannot adequately act in his or her own interest.
A low degree of understanding is required to make a contract in which the subject matter
and value are trivial. A higher degree is needed for the testamentary disposition of a
person’s assets.
The purpose of the psychiatric history and mental status examination is to obtain
information relevant to decisions about diagnosis and functional capacity. Page 72
The mental status examination is the formal process by which physicians discover the
presence of signs and symptoms of specific psychiatric disorders.
In the process of assessing a client/patients decision making capacity and autonomy, there
are four common pitfalls:
1. underestimating the patients ability
2. relying solely on a diagnosis
3. lack of independent assessment
4. failure to consider the patient’s life history
4 . Financing
i. Part A- funded by mandatory payroll tax- FICA and SECA
-funds are put into a trust fund (also supports OSADI)
-1.45% of wage income matched by employers
-don’t pay any extra, you get for working
ii. Part B- funded by monthly premium by beneficiary (93.50 deducted from SS)
and general govt. revenue
-monthly premium charged to all, regardless of age, to spread the risk of harm
(“community rating”)
5. Eligibility
i. Part A
-Over 65 and have paid FICA or SECA for a min. of 40 quarters OR
-Disabled as determined by SS, for at least 24 months OR
-End stage renal disease who need dialysis or transplant
-Over 65 but ineligible for SS b/c not enough quarters BUT they elect to buy part
A coverage (monthly premium lessens according to how many quarters you have)
ii. Part B
-Over 65 regardless of employment history
-Disabled persons eligible for Part A
-Persons with end stage renal disease who are eligible for Part A
-also available to people with RR or pensions at a higher monthly rate
Parts A- Inpatient Hospital- room and board routine nursing, diagnostic and thereputic
services, supplies, and equipment- where this is required it will cover RX drugs.
-Also includes skilled nursing facility care (SNF)
-only pays after a 3 day hospital stay
-w/in 30 days of the hospital discharge
-ACUTE care, not long term
Part B- wide range of non-institutional services- physicians(office or hospital),
disagnostic studies performed in office, outpatient diagnostic services, rural health
services, durable medical equipment (wheelchairs)
DOES NOT cover- RX drugs, routine physical, eye, hearing aids, dental services.
-only limited by the medical necessity of the patient
-annual 100 deductible and co-insurance payments
Health Maintenance Organization (HMO)- Contains costs by shifting some of the risk
of high cost health care to the provider
-this provides incentive to choose cheaper care
-Pays provides a predetermined amount- “capacitated payment” per patient, per
month
-If cost of care is less, the dr. keeps the surplus- if more then the dr. covers it
-problem with managed care is that the companies know that old people will cost
too much money
Once you are eligible the standard changes (once you receive the care)
-Less then 8 hrs/day AND
-Less then 28hrs./wk.
Don’t have to be bedridden, should be a considerable and taxing effort of the individual
If you do leave it has to be:
1. Infrequent OR
2. For the need for medical care
Prospective Payment
Problem: Abuse of home health providers for billing the system for services not rendered
Solution: Fixed payment for 60 day period 60% up front, then the rest at the end
Provider Appeals
A provider has the same appeal rights as a beneficiary.
Providers choosing not to participate in Medicare must pay back costs of services to
patients if Medicare finds that they are not reasonable and necessary. BUT the provider
can appeal if they did not know Medicare would not pay for the service.
Warder v. Shalala
Co. had device to help people with disease, had wheels and braces
If Medicare determines it a DME- no reimbursement
If it is a brace- then reimbursed
The manufacturer calls it a brace, Medicare calls it DME
CA- sides with Medicare
Grijalva v. Shalala
HMO turned down, not adequate notice, Is this state action?
-Medicare argues that it is the HMO that provides the benefits, so no state action
-other argue: no, this is state action
Ct sides with patient, it is a joint venture, Medicare writes the checks and HMO does the
work, It is state action
This expedited Medicare + Choice
Government long term care benefits are limited to the poor through Medicaid.
Medicaid- federal-state program providing health benefits to the poor.
Other Conditions- require a physical, will not take if too sick, will not pay for pre-
existing conditions (or at least after a period of time after purchasing the policy)
-Most policies guarantee that an individual premium will not go up (for getting older or
sicker)
-Premiums can go up across a class of policies, and often do
-Employers sometimes offer long term insurance as a benefit package, that is not taxable
Medicaid- nationwide health care program for the poor. Each state has own.
-Federal government does a match what the states put in, but the bulk of the money is
paid by the federal
-The state administers the program
-most are run by a managed care entity
If they want to reduce benefits they must provide
1. statement of the proposed action
2. reasons for taking the action
3. citations to regulations supporting the action
4. explanation of the circumstances
5. an explanation of the existing benefits
2. Medically Needy
-States do not have to offer this category, but can offer it
-OK does not offer
Requirements:
1. Meet SSI resource test
2. Have income that is insufficient to pay for medical care
3. Have to be over 65, blind, or disabled
Income Tests
2 different income tests to use in evaluating eligibility for medically needy
1. Spend down- spend down their income on medical expenses until a criteria is met
-individual income is Less then 133% of the monthly payment for a family of 2
EX- AFDC= 600/mo. Spend down level is 800. (600 X 133%= 800)
EX 2- PNA= personal needs allowance- keep 40 dollars
1350/mo- keep 40, 1310 left- Medicaid will pay the rest
Medicaid Planning-some try to preserve their estate and pass it on to reach eligibility.
Trying to do 2 things
1. Allow clients to pass along as much estate as possible
2. Qualify for Medicaid
Spousal Impoverishment- the old policy was to look at the income of both spouses to be
available to pay the nursing home of one
-if the resources as a couple were above 3,000, the person was ineligible
-This hurts the “community spouse”- one not going to the nursing hom
Treatment of income-
When in the community, spouses income are available to support each other
Once a spouse goes to a nursing home, only the institutionalized spouse’s income may be
considered.
-“Name on the check rule”- determines ownership of the income
-if community spouse has own SS check, pension, etc. not counted for the
Medicaid
What if the community spouse will not have enough money to live on?
MMMNA- 2007- $1650
-then the state will reallocate funds from the institutionalized spouse to the
community spouse
Treatment of Resources- assessment of resources is made at the time one spouse begins
continuous period of institutionalization, defined as more than 30 days
-called a “snapshot”- determines the value of the resources that can be attained by
the community spouse
-Half of the value of the total resources owned by the spouses indidually and
jointly is allocated to each spouse
-regardless of how it is titled- no name on check rule
-Can retain max up to 90,660, and a min of 18,132
Can keep more then maximum only by court order
Blumer- shows the difference between the income and resource tests…
2. Overall estate- this covers all the estate, not just probate
Law- when you apply for Medicaid, you have to be told that there is a Medicaid estate
recovery program
Policy- shifts the burden of payment from tax payers to the person
-can expand the program to help others
Criticisms: This hurts the poor only, people that can’t afford an attorney to do estate
planning,
-clashes with intergenerational legacies- people die and want to give their
property to their family
This threat of Medicaid estate recovery makes people who need it not want to apply
-discourages adult children to help their parents apply for Medicaid
Staffing- Major difference in higher and lower levels of care is the number and
qualifications of staff.
OBRA requires all facilities to have an LPN or an RN 24 hrs/day
-an RN must be there 8 hrs/day 7 days/wk
However there are waivers for these requirements if:
1. facility demonstrates it can’t obtain the personnel
2. state determines waiver will not endanger the health or safety of the individuals
3. State finds that there an RN or Dr. can respond immediately when called
3rd Party Guarantees-common to require a 3rd party to sign and assume responsibility
for payment.
-OBRA Prohibits clauses in K with nursing home that uses Medicaid or Medicare
-Cant require a 3rd party to sign the admission and agree to be financially
responsible
-can’t even require 3rd signature if it doesn’t make the person financially
responsible
Must have been an oral agreement, he had been an original party to that
Holding: Ac said there is no substantial evidence, no judgment for nursing home, favor of
Slovak
-Nursing home had illegal agreement that they could not enforce.
The specific injuries that give rise to successful suits are: bed sores, dehydration,
inadequate food, dysphagia, sexual assault, falls, struck by staff, struck by staff, injury or
death by physical or chemical restraints
Others are staff related- faiure to hire enough staff, not properly trained, not supervising,
hiring violent staff or with criminal backgrounds
It is hard to figure out who to sue- you have to go up the ladder because usually multiple
people own the nursing home
In Montgomery- the court found that evidence of past deficiency reports are admissible if
the deficiencies proximately caused the injury
Bankruptcy- D nursing home argued that punitive shouldn’t apply, b/c it is to deter, and
they are out of business
-the insurance will pay, so no adverse affect on them
Ct says punitive damages are ok, it will deter other nursing homes.
Many nursing home claims are now brought under state elder abuse statutes because
many state medical malpractice statutes have a cap on non-economic damages such as
pain and suffering.
V. Housing
Housing is critical to the quality of life of an elderly person.
B. Aging in Place
Most elders wish to remain where they have lived when they were younger.
-Home has memories, neighbors, familiarity
Must weigh the benefits of staying at home with the balance that the house is too much
work.
Determine whether there is:
1. Satisfactory quality of life
2. Access to needed help
3. Enough money to provide for support
Banks factor in how old the borrower is, gamble for the bank b/c they will not collect the
loan until the person dies
-they place a lien on the property and do not recover the loan until the person dies.
Drawback- Sometime old people get hit with high interest rates and fees, it is a
complicated concept for older people, it requires lots of paperwork
b. Sale and Leaseback- sell to 3rd party (family member)
Then the seller will lease it back for the lifetime of the occupant
-pay some sort of fair market rental or IRS problems
If child can’t buy it in full, the parent can loan the money and the buyer pays in
installments
c. Housesharing- Get someone else to come live in your house (friend, family, other)
This can help with social interaction, but it is bad if you have a bad roommate
-most are brokered by church or community service to try and make a match
Helps financially with the payment of rent, and also functionally by maintenance of the
house.
Q 2. (412) Thelma (77) wants her niece to Nancy (43) to come live with her. Thelma
wants to know if Nancy should be made power of attorney.
- look to potential for abuse, look to the quality of the relationship
Senior Valuation Limitation- some states freeze the tax at a constant rate after the
applicant reaches a certain age (usually 65)
-if house goes up in value, your prop tax goes up, if your income is fixed, you can
lock in prop tax for the rest of your life
OK- 65+, income 52,500/yr
2. Accessing Quality in-home services- identifying needs and coordinating the delivery
of care.
a. Geriatric Care Managers- asses the older person’s needs and plan for service delivery
in coordination with the family and the client.
-Functional Assessment- Inventory of the individuals capabilities and losses
b. Employment of Caregivers-
If you hire a caregiver to come into the home, you are an employer for tax, SS, and other
purposes.
-You must pay at least minimum wage
Options
Hire and Agency to rotate people or hire one person- full time
-they must get an employee identification number
-employers must verify employee’s citizenship
c. Retirement Housing
1. Restricted Communities-offers homogeneity and security b/c it is closed off from the
rest of the community.
-offers security and stability
Congresses Fair Housing Act allows a discrimination exemption for communities for
older persons if:
1. Housing is specifically designed and operated to assist elders
2. Housing intended for and solely occupied by persons 62+
3. Housing intended for and solely occupies by persons 55+
1. Prescription
2. Bathing (AOL)
3. Laundry (IAD)
Board and care homes-community based residences for older adults who need
supportive assistance.
-range from mom and pop to institutional size
-offer room and board, 24 hr supervision, housekeeping, laundry, personal care
-charge less than assisted living facilities
Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRC)- Guarentees residents lifetime
appropriate care that includes independent living, assisted living, and nursing home care.
-very expensive, mainly middle and upper income residents
-high admission fee, sometimes refundable
-helps support capital costs of facility, and is insurance that you will pay
for your stay
Benefits:
1. Guarantee that you will be taken care of for life
2 Benefit- never have to move again
Residents sign a K- Issue: When can they force you from one level to the next?
Issue: What do they do with your entrance fee if you die very soon after entering?
Bower v. The Estaugh
-She enters into a life care agreement, Nonprofit- provided entrance fee of 16,750
Monthly fee of $360
She lives there and dies 34 days later, they will not refund the money
K:- 3 mo probationary adjustment period- can terminate w/ written notice
-if you die in the period, the terminate right ceases
-upon death, all entry fees become the permanent property of the community, no
right of refund
Ct favors facility
State argues- facility will be unjustly enriched
Ct says the ct is charity corporation, they ran the risk that if she outlived her resources,
they would have to subsidize
Void against PP- ct said no, case law supports the facility
Life care agreements are not void against PP, PP should encourage facilities like this
1. Restrictions on Group Homes-must find a location that will not violate zoning laws.
Many group homes wish to be in single family zoned neighborhoods. But laws restrict
based on the definition of family.
People complain based on:
-decline in prop values
-increase in traffic
Another way to enforce zoning is to put a cap on a number of unrelated individuals that
can live in a home.
Rowatti
People remodel their home, and made an apt with their home for mom- gave her privacy
and independence
-Ct ruled for the zoning law
Not ok to turn single family into multi-family dwelling
Ct upheld the zoning board
Design and physical appearance can impair the neighborhood
Subsidized Housing for the Elderly-national policy addressed problems posed by the
needs of poor aging population.
Demand Side Section 8 Rent Subsidaries-How are low income people going to afford
housing?
-Sec 8 housing subsidies are vouchers- qualify economically- if you get a voucher
you then go to any housing, and w/ your income + fair market rates, you can get
an apt.
-This way poor people don’t congregate in one area, protects the poor
from bad neighborhoods
-Landlords have to agree to accept it though
VI. Guardianship
A. The need for Guardianship for the elderly-When an individual can no longer make
all the decisions necessary to manage property and personal affairs, someone else must
make those decisions on his or her behalf.
-usually financial decisions and personal decisions-healthcare, living
arrangements, etc.
Guardians
1. Agent under durable power of attorney-
-recommend to do this in advance
-too late once they aren’t thinking clearly
-they can’t sign a durable power of atty if they are incapacitated
Guardianship is last resort- This is very drastic, they make all decisions
Dementia and Alzheimer’s are the most common reasons for a guardian to be appointed.
2 types of dementia
1. Alzheimer’s- diagnosis is now more accurate
-The only way to confirm is through an autopsy
-Alzheimer’s has certain RX, and needs a certain environment
2. Cerebral Vascular- physical condition
-can be reversible
-treatable
-clinical indicia is an abrupt onset
The guardian is supposed to ensure the rights are protected, that the ward can participate
in decisions
There is no history of Rome or England, but guardianships were heard in courts of equity
US has only one court system
-Courts of equity try to follow the law and take into account the best interest of
the people before them
-There the State created an obligation to protect the vulnerable older citizens
Question(from class)- in a non adversarial action (benevolent) how much is due process
worth?
Would you want a trial? Ex- your mother
Would you want her to defend her right?
Would you want to confront her with examples of why she can’t make decisions.
Determination of incapacity-
A critical question in determining incapacity is how do you define it?
-Should advanced age alone be a determination?
-No, not by itself, in most states it has been deleted as a requirement.
What are other factors?
-In Shamblin the court held that past physical ailments and giving gifts to
grandchildren are not reasons for incompetency.
Shamblin v. Collier
Man contesting guardianship- daughter just said he was incompetent b/c of his age, and
that his health had deteriorated
-at the TC GAL and daughter testified
Daughter- dad cant read or write- BUT he could never read or write
-he also had given gifts to his grandchildren (50 or 100) bad decisions on a fixed
income
-her overriding concern was the cost of care for her father
-dad was not there b/c he couldn’t read, he didn’t know about it.
The GAL said that he could not manage affairs b/c of age, inability to read/write, and his
weight had dropped
-affidavit from doctor- not present- just checked boxes on a sheet
AC- not sufficient evidence to appoint a guardian
Holding: Past physical ailments and giving gifts to grandchildren are not reasons for
incompetancy.
In OK- to show incapacity, you must show person is impaired (subjective), plus the part
which is test for incapacity (objective)
Part 1
- “incapacitated”- person who is impaired by:
-mental illness, retardation, physical illness or disability, drug abuse, other
similar cause
-does not mention mental problems (dementia)
Part 2
Ability to receive and evaluate information effectively
1. Person lacks the capacity to meet essential health or safety
2. Person is unable to manage financial resources
Assessing mental capacity-many states require more then one person to assess and
individual’s need for a guardian. Most often they call for a medical professional, mental
health profession, and a community health professional.
1. Medical Assessment-60+ conditions can cause dementia (vitamin deficiency,
strokes, etc.)
2. Psychological- 2 tools are used for a psychological evaluation:
-assessment interview
-standardized test- general appearance and behavior, mood and affect,
perception of self and world, thinking: including intellectual
functioning, memory, attention, concentration, insight, and judgment
Questions: day of the week, President, etc.
3. Functional
-Basic inventory of Activities of Daily Living (ADL’s)- eating, walking,
talking, dressing, appointments, paying bills, etc.
-How well a person take care of themselves
Candura-
Woman refuses to consent to same operation as Tennesee, but court lets her choose to
keep her feet.
In this case hospital files for guardianship
Ct said that she had a right to make a competent, unwise choice
-She showed the ct that she understood the consequences of her decision
-so they let her make that decision
Dad testifies about personal info, they did a mini mental exam on the stand
-said when he discovered that grandson had stolen, he sat down with him
-said he wanted to transfer the house to the grandson to keep the house in the
family, this would assure that, the daughter who would have sold it
Question: Should someone ever be incompetent for giving away money if they have
enough money to keep up an ok standard of living? –it depends upon the extent.
Doctrine of least restrictive alternative- provides that the least restrictive assistance
should be applied, to protect that person’s rights.
-court would have to look to other sources of help, like family or community,
before appointing a guardian
Representative Payee: government often appoints someone without even having a face to
face interview
Usually when you get a representative payee for a social security check, that’s usually the
only asset they have
Conservatorships: in a lot of states this is used interchangeably with the word guardian
Conservatorship vs. guardianship: conservatorship the person does not have to be deemed
incompetent and conservatorship gains control over the property of somebody, has
nothing to do with the person
Harvey v. Meador
-what is the appropriate standard should consider when appointing conservator
-four elderly uncles
-each uncle owned 1/8 interest in farm in another state
-not long before nephews petitioned court, uncles sold the land
-at the hearing, testified that uncles sold the land for way below value
-all uncles had health problems
-court held not enough evidence to appoint conservator
-so what is the appropriate standard?
Provides that a conservator can be appointed for any person who:
• Advanced age
• Physical incapacity
• Mental weakness
-Court has to look at statues
Advanced age alone not sufficient
Physical incapacity not sufficient alone
Mental weakness:
• Developed management competency test
o Incapable of understanding and acting within ordinary affairs of
life
Unable to manage property etc.
By the time got to appeal three of the four uncles had died
He had advanced age, mental weakness by selling property for too cheap, and he
denied that the attorney was his attorney
• Attorney paid by buyers of the property
• Conflict of interest?
o Found trial court was wrong and that he needs conservator
o Court struggled to separate guardianship and conservator
Limited guardianship: partially incapacitated- fine line for judges to decide a lot of
guardianships are health care issues, very rarely used
Guardianship diversion: guardianship petition is filed then prior to person being found
incapacitated then meeting is held and agreement is made for certain services needed, do
not have to adjudicate person incapacitated
Agreement just involves petitioner to the case and social services worker
When the guardian makes decisions about the personal lifestyle of the ward, the guardian
is held by state statutes to either a best interests standard (deciding for the ward in a
way that favors health, safety, and financial security) or a substituted judgment
standard (deciding for the ward as the ward would most likely have decided if the ward
were able).
The best interest’s standard may be inappropriate for adults because an adult can
choose to deviate from the norm
Best interests is objective standard
Substituted judgment is when make decision they would have made
In re Medworth
-there remains insufficient evidence to show relocation was in Medworht’s best interests
or essential to provide for her care
-conservator failed to consider seriously any additional housing alternatives for
Medworth
-no evidence as to cost of making home safer
-conservator made only one telephone call
-Medworth is capable of living at home
-Proper care could be provided
o In practice the best interest standard and the substituted judgment standard nearly always
reach the same conclusion
Supplement case:
There are some decisions a guardian can make that require court approval which includes
committing your ward to a psy hospital/ mental institution- need court permission for this
In some states need to get permission before committing your ward to a nursing home
even
Guardianship of Agnes
-Voluntarily admitted herself to nursing home
-County DHS applied to appoint themselves
-Guardian ad litem objected saying before guardian can submit ward to nursing home
must have a hearing- protective placement hearing
-County argued don’t need to do that because she voluntarily was already in the nursing
home for the past 16 years
-Trial judge appointed guardian but did not require hearing
-App ct said wrong-
Its such an important decision and she cannot now consent because she is
currently incompetent, therefore need the hearing
Supplement Case:
-DNR case- 79 year old man, alone no friends or family
-Has bad medical and health conditions
-Health and human services appointed guardian
-Court said must include court in all no code orders
-Guardian filed motion because they wanted to execute DNR order on behalf of this man
-He had advanced dementia, pulmonary disease etc.
-Only person who testified at the hearing was his doctor
-He testified chance of actually bringing him back if necessary was 1 in 100
-To do cpr on Lea would be cruel, futile and un ethical
-Court found by clear and convincing evidence guardian should be able to execute DNR
-Then Leo died
-App court said the lower ct did not error
Priorty of Appointment
Usually starts with closet family member
Can also include someone that the person has indicated in writing while they were
competent
Most guardians are terminated by death- when ward dies powers as guardian ceases
In re Harris
-Removal of a guardian case
-Situation of older woman
-Nephew is appointed her guardian
-Then the ward starts making complaints, that she has no money they never come visit
her, her house has mice, home and yard are run down and she had little food
-Guardian didn’t live in the same state as the ward
-And one of the public health nurses petitioned the court to have the guardian removed
-Guardian said he was trying to do a good job but ward would not cooperate
-Court terminated the guardian and appointed the public nurse as guardian
Generally for a guardian to be removed there has to be evidence that something really
wrong has been done
Durable- recent term, power that endures beyond the incapacity of the principle
All states have statute authorizing durable power of attorneys
We have it title 58, 1071 to 1071
General requirements: must be in writing, signed by principle, witnessed and dated- some
require notarization
Somewhere it has to say that it endures after the incapacity of the principle
Death terminates the power of attorney- once principle dies power ceases
Can be revoked by the principle at any time as long as the principle is competent
Until the agent is aware that their agency has been revoked any acts they do as an agent
are still valid until they receive notice
Immediate powers: durable goes into effect immediately unless other wise specified-
once signed the durable power of attorney goes into effect
Springing powers: goes into effect at time specified- like one the principle is deemed
incapacitated, but again who is going to decide if the person has become incapacitated
Clause: personal physician can write letter or two independent physicians can
certify that the person is incapacitated
Uniform durable power of attorney act: if you put it in the for witness to sign and sworn
statement- this is a presumption of capacity
Gifts by an agent: in most of farris’ documents he does not authorize the agent to make
gifts
May be good reason for agent to make gifts out of principles money
Can give up to $12,000 each calendar year to anyone you want
Moewr v. Eddie:
Lady was 103
Niece and nephew moved into help her because she broken her hip
Became agent for her
Transferred tons of money from her to them
And they spent the money
This is major danger with durable power
safe deposit boxes- some banks do not authorize this or honor it- solution to this would be
to have trust
joint tenancy: common to try and use joint tenancy as poor mans will
drawbacks:
can take money out for themselves
joint tenancy trumps a will
Joint tenancy:
Often a widow adds child
Joint tenancy accounts have right of survivorship
Potential for abuse but the joint tenant
Can clean the account out
Account can be attacks by childs creditors
Upon death the child is legally owner of all of the account
Often times the elderly person does not want to give the child ownership, just wants to
give them management of the account
Kitchen v. Guarisco
Husband dies
Woman buys four different joint tenancy cd’s for $1000 each
Her name and her daughters name
One is mother or daughter
She noted money is to pay her bills
Mom dies
And daughter takes all the money
And sister objects
Saying mom never intended joint tenancy just doing it for convenience
Never intended to create survivorship and daughter needs to pay money back
However, daughter probably already spent it
informed consent: in some cases it is a myth, doctor would rather just make the decision
themselves
Cruzan v. Director
No constitutional right to die, close
What is death?
Cessation of all circulation and respiration- traditional death
As long as they have respiration then circulation continues then still alive-
respirators
Brain Death: irreversible cessation of all function including the brain stem page 571
Uniform Definition Death Act
Living wills don’t deal with brain death only permanent vegetative state or terminally ill
Persistent vegetative state not the same as brain death: two parts of brain is divided,
persistent vegetative state only one part of the brain dies
Federal law- any patient that accepts Medicaid or Medicare then they are offered the
chance to sign a living will- no matter what the are being admitted for- even a hang will,
because so few people have those documents
A living will becomes operative when its communicated to the attending physician that
you have one
And then its only operative if the patient is incapacitated and the patient cannot
voice their own decisions
What if the dr or hospital wont comply with the persons living will?
Some drs. Have their own moral viewpoints
Most all state living will statutes provide that if dr of hospital will not or
cannot honor living will then patient must be transferred to a hospital that
will
Two main types of docs for surrogate decision maker in case person becomes
incapacitated
Farris says:
Living will/ health care proxy- death and dying document end of life decisions/
advanced directive
Durable powers of atty- deals with other health care decisions-
**Health care proxy form can be used in lieu of the durable power of atty- because that
would cover everything
Oklahoma’s advanced directives for death and dieing is limited to what the person
specified
Traditionally durable powers were limited to prop decisions- but in ok we have durable
power of atty act
Fed government in 1990 passed self determination act- required by law to offer advanced
directive and your right to sign one each time you go to hospital
If a person is incapacitated and cant make own decision and no durable power or
advanced directive some states have default surrogate decision maker
Have a priority list
Who ever they specified orally
Then spouse
Then adult children
Parents
Adult siblings
Adviosory decision that don’t want to be kept alive in persistent vegetative state- wont
work in OK
What if surrogate refuses to terminate health care?
Health care proxy language?
Dr could ask the court
Error on the side of life b/c death is final
Cruzan case:
What about terminating life sustaining treatment based on a best interest test?
Explain based on substituted judgment (objective factors) versus surrogate
decision maker (subjective test)
Woods v. Kentucky
Disabeled individual
1 in 14 incidents of home domestic elder neglect and self neglect come to authorities
two types:
by a third party
self neglect
financial exploitation: only one in 25 cases reported- 5 million cases a year
for every one elder abuse case that’s reported, 5 more go unreported
elder abuse not isolated incidents but something that happens over and over again
Neglect largest area of elder abuse page 636 58.5% of elder abuse
Self neglect- own behavior threatens their own health and safety
Victims: typically it’s a female and she is 75 years or older and she is being abused by
someone who is living with her, dependant on the abuser for her care or protection
Women most subject to abuse
Family stress- elder use in a family situation- like the stress of caring for the elderly
person is the one who does the abusing
Other reasons:
Are revenge or retaliation: if you were abused when you were little then you are
likely to abuse
Drugs or alcohol
Or financial dependence on the victim is another reason
Form of control: intimidate the victim so they do everything the care giver says
Institutional caregivers:
Three reasons why abuse:
Under staffing
Low wages
Inadequate training
Most frequent type of institutional setting is physical restraints- tying the person to the
bed to make their job easier
Also hitting, slapping, yelling and anger, placing in isolation- all happens in nursing
homes
SELF NEGLECT
Issue is does this person still have the capacity or the competency to make these
decisions?
Concept of self neglect: an older person who fails to meet his or her basic needs for food,
shelter, clothing, or health care
Balancing elderly person’s autonomy vs. states interest to protect the person
Under emergency can take the people out of the home immediately
Then have like 24 to 72 hours to file a petition with the court
If they feel the person is incapacitated then court can appoint guardian
Guardian can be family member or adult protective services worker
Or can let the people go home if they are found competent
MANDATORY REPORTING
If they suspect elder abuse, then they are required to report it
But that is controversial because we are assuming we are dealing with a competent adult
who could report for themselves if they wanted to
FINANCIAL ABUSE
With physical abuse, you see bruises or injuries, etc. but how do you see financial abuse?
You don’t unless the financial abuse leaves the elderly person destitute, like they
are not getting enough to eat etc.
Really not many ways to find out about it
Some Stats
Only 1 in 14 incidents come to authorities
-this includes self neglect
There are 2 categories
-neglect by a 3rd party
-self neglect- big part of abuse
Financial exploitation-1 in 25 cases reported- 5 million abuses/ yr
For every 1 case of abuse which is reported, 5 more go unreported- big problem
Domestic Caregivers-
1. The biggest factor for abuse is family stress.
-this comes from the strain of financial and emotional support
-creates an intolerable burden when resources are strained
2. Retaliation or Revenge- many elder abusers were abused themselves as children
3. Substance Abuse Problems-most abuse occurs when the abuser is drunk or on drugs
4. Occasionally abusers suffer from mental illness which is triggered from the stress.
5. A caregiver that is financially independent on the abused- this creates hostility and
resentment
6.Control- all abusers try to control- some to make their job easier-this usually comes
in the form of psychological abuse
Self Neglect-older person that fails to meet their basic needs for food, shelter,
clothing, or health care.
A big issue is individual autonomy vs. the power of the state to provide for the citizen
Also competency: if they have competency- they can deny voluntary services
If a person chooses to neglect themselves it is their will. You can not force standards
of living on someone else.
Herbert Byrne
Legal arguments about when the state comes in. Here a social worker visits finds man
naked, living in filth, bad conditions. A cop took him to a hospital and the social
worker got an emergency order and appointed counsel.
His Atty- filed to dismiss- emergency procedures were unconstitutional and Insufficient
evidence to establish need for services. The TC denied so the atty- appealed.
Are the procedures constitutional? Argued:
1. deprived of due process- likened to commitment proceeding or incarceration- so need
notice, hearing. The ct says no- purpose is to protect, not punish, limited to emergency
use and state has obligation to preserve life
2. Unconstitutionally vague- could lead to indefinite commitment- ct says
3. State is ultimate guardian of citizens- in no circumstances can the state force it,
but when old age leads to deterioration of competency they can.
Adult Protective Services- every state has one which is similar but not identical and
they all have the same primary functions:
-to prevent abuse and provide supportive services
-if necessary they will remove from home
1. Procedures- investigate reports of abuse and voluntary or involuntary interventions
-can come from self reporting or 3rd party reports
-victim must consent to help or a ct must make a determination of incapacity
If there is abuse- they offer protective services- LOTS of services (health, social,
psychological, medical, and legal assistance.
-bottom line- states offer and they have to have consent
2. Consent to Services
For incapacity-Should look for REASONED decision- not reasonable
Social workers- fast track to guardianships- bias to protect the person- hard for a 3rd
party to objectively look at the person
-authorized to take out of home and then have time period to file petition with ct for
emergency order
1. extreme- if they are incompetent- can result in guardian- family or APS worker
2. dismissal- no emergency and they go back to their home
Mandatory Reporting- certain people required by law- close contact-Dr., social worker,
etc.
-Pros: helps for those who are scared to report for themselves
-Cons: Controversial- dealing with competent adult- treating them like a child-
not ok
-no stats, don?t know if its even effective
Financial Abuse-Identify the abusive acts, categorize as fraud, then correct w/ restoring
funds
Differences:
-Not as visible as physical abuse
-Problem: don?t unless it gets so bad that they are not fed, or clothed anymore
-or poor hygiene
Financial- if they just take most money they don?t get found out
Schunk
Mom moves in with adult daughter, 1st she makes her executor of her will, next POA
Then over 9 yrs- daughter took 180,000 of her money out of moms acct. Other siblings
brought suit-sued for conversion
Defenses- SOL- couldn?t look at some of the money she took
Looked at part- defense was mom wanted her to have to money and she had permission
mom was dead so no way to confirm
Ct ruled- she didn?t make the prima facie defense- sent back to TC- don?t know result