Sie sind auf Seite 1von 9

IN THE 10TH Judicial Circuit Court of Jefferson County, State of Alabama Birmingham Division Harold Sorensen Plaintiff, V.

V. Mark Kennedy, Chairman of the Alabama Democratic Party, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. CV201200023

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION I Harold Sorensen, being first sworn, say: 1. I am the Plaintiff in the above-entitled action, and I make this Affidavit in support of my Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.

2. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated in this Affidavit, and, if called as a witness, I could testify competently to them.

3.

Under Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States, it is stated:

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) Ex Parte Lockwood, 154 U.S. 116 (1894) (aka In Re Lockwood at Justia), is essentially the holy grail of support for Minor v. Happersett, as it states: In Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162, this court held that the word citizen is often used to convey the idea of membership in a 1

nation, and, in that sense, women, if born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction of the United States, have always been considered citizens of the United States, as much so before the adoption of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution as since (Emphasis added.) This court held is proof that 20 years after Minor v. Happersett, the Supreme Court was citing Minor as precedent for the definition of federal citizenship, such definition relying upon a construction of Article 2 Section 1 the natural born Citizen clause - which implies that Candidate Obama is not eligible to be POTUS as his father, Barack Obama, Sr., was a British Subject at the time of his birth and NOT a citizen of the United States. Furthermore, the Lockwood court included Justice Horace Gray who wrote the infamous opinion in U.S. v Wong Kim Ark (which also cites the natural-born citizen passage of Minor as precedent 169 U.S. 649, 680 (1898)) albeit not in such a direct manner as Lockwood). And Lockwood had nothing at all to do with voting rights.

4.

In one fast swoop, upon the discovery of Lockwood, the war against Minors relevance

had been won. Minor is, beyond question, precedent on the definition of federal citizenship. And it has never been overruled as in 1982 it was cited by the Supreme Court in City of Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55 (1980) as continuing precedent for its holding on voting rights as well. Candidate Barack Hussein Obama, II is not a natural born citizen and is not qualified to be on the ballot as a Presidential candidate in 2012. In 2008, when Candidate Mr. Obama ran for the U.S. presidency, he was never vetted and he never provided any documentary evidence of his natural born status. In fact The National Democratic Party in 2008 NEVER certified to the State of Alabama or the other 48 States that Candidate Barack Hussein Obama II was Constitutionally eligible for the Office of President of the United States. On January 20, 2009 as required by

Article II, Section 1, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution Candidate Obama took an Oath of Office: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. If Candidate Obama was not eligible for Office of the President of the United States upon taking that Oath he committed usurpation, perjury and misprision of felony. It is now imperative that Candidate Obama prove he is Constitutionally eligible for the 2012 Election Cycle.

5.

The Certificate of Live Birth Obama presented on television on April 27, 2011 is a

forgery as evidenced by the attached Revised and Expanded Affidavit of Douglas B. Vogt. The most staggering evidence, is Mr. Obamas lack of a valid Social Security number and his use of a fraudulently obtained Social Security number from the state of Connecticut, a state, where he never resided, which was never assigned to Obama, according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Information has been received from licensed investigator Susan Daniels as well as recently retired senior deportation officer John Sampson that for most of his life Barack Obama used and is currently using Connecticut social security number 042-68-4425. The first three digits of the number 042 were assigned by the Social Security Administration to the State of Connecticut. Based upon information and belief, Obama was never a resident of Connecticut. Concerned that we have an individual fraudulently using a stolen social security number from a state, where he never resided, Linda Jordan, Affidavit attached, attempted to verify this information through official sources of the U. S. Government. According to selfcheck.uscis.gov the social security number Mr. Obama is currently using is a mismatch. According to SSNVS (Social Security

Number Verification System), verification results indicate Failed SSN not in file (never issued). Additionally, Affidavit of Felicity Papa showing that Barack Obama is using the same Connecticut social security number 042-68-4425 on his 2009 tax returns, which were posted on the official web site WhiteHouse.gov. This tax return was later reposted with the file flattened and the social security number electronically whitened, however the original file with the visible social security number was downloaded by Mr. Papa and multiple other individuals. A true and correct copy of such affidavit are attached herein.

6.

Plaintiff has additional definitive proof of misrepresentation, evidence of fraud, identity

theft, and withholding evidence from the Citizens of the State of Alabama which will be presented in Court.

7.

Citizens are compelled under law, Title 18 U.S.C. 4. Misprision of felony. Whoever,

having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. CONCLUSION 1. Plaintiff is seeking a preliminary injunction against Mark Kennedy, Chairman of

the Alabama Democratic Party, to prevent certification of Candidate Mr. Obama for 2012 Alabama ballot access pending final hearing.

2.

Plaintiff is seeking an evidentiary hearing and production of the original long

form birth certificate and microfiche copy of such original birth certificate of Candidate Barack Hussein Obama to be presented at the hearing as no law enforcement official nor Court has, to Plaintiffs knowledge, ever investigated the matter based upon the merits. 3. Original application to Connecticut SSN 042-68-4425, which Mr. Obama is using

on his tax returns and is not assigned to him according to E-Verify. 4. 5. Original application of Mr. Obamas Selective Service Registration. To date, none of the allegations of criminal activity presented in this motion, i.e.

forgery, identity theft, perjury, social security fraud, have ever been investigated by law enforcement nor the Courts to Plaintiffs knowledge. 6. Modification of rules/ regulations for candidate eligibility, citizenship, criminal

activity, verification/authentication, in order to stop elections fraud , forgery, identity theft, usurpation, and assure the Citizens of Alabama integrity of the elections process. _______________________________ Signed this the _7th__day of __January, 2012 Harold Sorensen, P. O. Box 44, Luverne, Alabama 36049

Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, of the State of Alabama, County of, Crenshaw, this 7th day of January, 2012, that the above named person did appear before me and was identified to be the person executing this document. ____________________________________ Notary Public My Commission Expires On: ________________________
5

IN THE 10TH Judicial Circuit Court of Jefferson County, State of Alabama Birmingham Division Harold Sorensen Plaintiff V. Mark Kennedy, Chairman of Alabama Democratic Party Defendant CIVIL ACTION NO. CV201200023

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION I am the Plaintiff in the above-entitled action, and I make this motion for a preliminary injunction against Mark Kennedy, Chairman of the Alabama Democratic Party and the motion is as follows.

1.

Plaintiff is seeking a preliminary injunction against Mark Kennedy, Chairman of the

Alabama Democratic Party to prevent certification of Candidate Mr. Obama for 2012 Alabama ballot access pending final hearing based on factual evidentiary findings.

2.

In 2008, the DNC certified an ineligible Candidate Barack Obama, and thus defrauded

the American people. This was a violation of basic voters rights and Obamas subsequent usurpation constitutes the greatest crime ever perpetrated against the American people. Our socalled representative in government, the courts and the media were brazenly complicit and to this day they continue to cover up a crime so egregious that it threatens the founding principles upon which this country was based. Alabama lacks election codes authorizing any state officials to screen candidate selections from political parties. The State of Alabama has decided to not protect their citizens from unqualified candidates. Therefore, political parties have essentially 6

unfettered authority to determine which candidates appear on ballots. The party is free to submit Saddam Hussein or Mickey Mouse as their next Presidential Candidate and the State of Alabama would be required to accept submission and waste taxpayer money on ballots for such candidates. Alabama is a Constitutional Republic, not a democracy without a Constitution. In a Constitutional Republic the power of the majority is limited and cannot infringe upon protected rights of a minority. The Constitution is an anti-majoritarian document: meaning that it protects individuals from invasions and usurpations by the majority. Constitutionally protected rights are held inviolate regardless of the majoritys desire to violate them and protects the individual right to life, liberty, or property. Attached is my January 5, 2012 letter to Democratic Party Chairman Mark Kennedy which clearly shows that in the State of Alabama it is the Party Chairmans that must vet and certify all candidates for Alabama Election Ballot Access.

3.

Defendant, Chairman Mark Kennedy, is knowledgeable of all the court cases that have

been dismissed against President Obama since 2008. Defendant Chairman Mark Kennedy is an Attorney and former Alabama Supreme Court Justice and knows that every Court case was dismissed without the Merits of the Cases ever being heard in a Court of Law. It would be sure negligence on the Part of Chairman Mark Kennedy to not have documents in hand before Certifying Candidate Obama for Alabama 2012 Ballot Access to prove without a shadow of doubt that Candidate Obama is in fact a Natural Born Citizen, has reached the age of 35 and been a Resident of the United States for 14 years as required by Article II, Section 1 Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States the Supreme Law of the Land and would have resolved all criminal allegations against Candidate Obama.

4.

Plaintiff is seeking an evidentiary hearing and production of the original long form birth

certificate and microfiche copy of such original birth certificate of Candidate Barack Hussein Obama to be presented at the hearing.

5.

Original application to Connecticut SSN 042-68-4425, to which Candidate Mr. Obama is

using on his tax returns and is not assigned to him according to E-Verify.

6.

It is undisputed that Mr. Obamas father was not a U.S. citizen. To Plaintiffs knowledge

Candidate Obama has never denied the fact that his father was not a U.S. Citizen, nor has he ever made any statements contrary to this fact. The U.S. Supreme Court has defined natural born citizens as all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens. See minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 167 (1875). The Court in Happersett did go on to state that other subcategories of people may or may not be within the broader term citizen. However, it did so only after specifically identifying the narrower category natural-born citizens. Id. The

Happtersett Court clearly understood and established that citizen is a much broader term than natural-born citizens. Its discussion of citizen does not negate or alter its earlier definition of the term natural-born citizens. See Id. At 167-168. This precedent has never been questioned by any subsequent Supreme Court. This precedent is binding. Because it is undisputed that Candidate Obama can never be a natural-born citizen, as that term was defined by the U.S. Supreme Court. Therefore, Candidate Obama cannot meet the Constitutional requirements to hold the office of President. See U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1.

7.

Modification of rules/ regulations for candidate eligibility verification/authentication, in

order to stop elections fraud, forgery, usurpation, and assure the citizens of Alabama integrity of the elections process.

8.

For the reasons set forth herein, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court grant

Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction.

By:

_______________________________ Signed this the _7th__day of __January__2012 Harold Sorensen, P. O. Box 44, Luverne, Alabama 36049

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen