Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Feedmixture(Recipe)developmentformixedwastedigesters
PresentedBy:AshwaniKumar,P.Eng. P dB A h iK PE Sr.ProcessEngineer Feb28,2011 OVIVO IGWE
Ovivoataglance
Atrueglobalbusiness TheonlyglobalPureWater dedicatedsolelytowater, Company,focusedonwater. wastewaterandrenewable energyfromwaste. 1500employeesin5 continentsand21countries. 1,500employeeson5 continentsand21countries. Waterexpertisein17 industries. Mostextensivetechnology portfolio;bringingexpertise tf li b i i ti together Supportedthrough15 GlobalCentersof Excellence. Technology Supply Design TechnologySupply,Design Builders,Completesystem providers
2
200yearsinthemaking
Biomethanation Expertise/Structure
Biomethanation Expertise/Structure
GLV GWE
Createdbytwoleadingglobal companiesinindustrial GLV d wastewatertreatment,GLV and GlobalWaterEngineeringLimited (GWE) OvivoGWE,anindustrial wastewatertreatment,wateruse, andgreenenergysolutions and green energy solutions providerfortheNorthAmerican marketplace.
OVIVOIGWEAdvantage
1. Completeprojectwrapup 2. PreTreatment 3. Pretreatmentenhanceddigestion(RAPTORTM) 4. Solidseparation 5. Gasutilization 5 Gas utilization 6. Digestate treatment.
QubecProjects
Quebec1
Location: ProjectType: Capacity: Substrate: Landfillsite PPP(51%public,49%Private) 20to25000t/yr 20 to 25000 t/yr SSO Slaughterhousesludge Commercial,Institutionalresidues Upgrading,compression,usedincity trucksandbuses k db Mechanicaldewatering Liquidandsolidfertilizer
Biogas: Digestate:
Quebec2
Location: ProjectType: Capacity: Substrate: b Industrialpark PPP(66%public,34%Private) 80to90000t/yr SSO Agrifoodresidues Commercial,Institutionalresidues H2Sremoval,usedinethanolplant Mechanicaldewatering g Liquidandsolidfertilizer UF/ROtreatment
8
Biogas: Digestate: g
ProjectsEngineered(Ontraio)
HarvestPowerMustangRaptorProject,LondonON
Location: ProjectType: Capacity: Substrate: LondonON Private 60to75000t/yr CoFeed DAF,Marketwaste,KitchenWaste,aerobic Sludge CombustedinCHPtogenerateElectricity Mechanicaldewatering Solidfertilizer
Biogas: Digestate:
HarvestPowerMustangRaptorProject,LondonON (AnotherView)
10
RAPTOR
TM
RAPTORTM
RAPTORTM FEATURES
1. Efficientandrapidconversionof organic residuestobiogas
RAPTORTM SUBSTRATES
1. 2. 3. 4. Energycrops,Corn(silage),VariousGrasses,Algae Agricultureresidues Marketsurplus,kitchenwaste,restaurantwaste Market surplus, kitchen waste, restaurant waste Offspecfruit&vegetables,Excessharvest (tomatoes,) Agroindustryresidues: Beetpulp,Tapiocapulp Vegetable/potatowaste V t bl / t t t Fat, Oil&Grease,DAF,CDAF Blood&otherwastesfromrenderingplants. Industrialresidues Brewerywaste Fruitprocessingwastes Papermillsludge
2.
3. 3 4.
5. 6.
Diversepretreatment totreatcomplexorganic matter 5. 6. Lowresidueproduction L id d ti 7. 7 8. 9. Accurate,labtestedandcomputeraided processdesign Continuous,easyandpractical operation Flexibleprocess,easilyadaptablefor new substrates bt t
12
Pretreatmentstoincreasespeedandyieldofanaerobicdigestion process
Enzymatic forcellulosic/hemicellulosicsubstances Chemical mildcaustictreatmentforpolysaccharides/proteins Thermal slurryheatingforanimalproducts,proteins/fats Thermal slurry heating for animal products proteins/fats Mechanical particlesizereduction;finemashing Biological ThermophilicAcidificationReactor(TAR)
13
ORGANICRESIDUES
ENERGYCROPS
CORN GRASSES STARCH
MANURES
PIG,DAIRYCOW POULTRY
SLURRIES
MUNICIPALSLUDGE INDUSTRIALWASTES FOODINDUSTRY SLAUGHTERHOUSE FOG,DAF FLOAT
14
Samples
Economicalevaluationofthemix(feedsubstrates)
AdditionalRevenue i. Risk i. Technical,Legal&Safetychallenges
ii. Cofeedormainfeed iii. Quantity&Quality Seasonal,RegularORSpotopportunity iv. Processing ii. Gain i. TipFee onreception&processing ii. Additionalenergy canyouexportthat? ii Additi l t th t? iii. Additionalfertilizer Impactionfertilizerquality? iv. Possibilitytosubstituteanyothersubstrate comingfromlonger iv Possibility to substitute any other substrate coming from longer distance,lowenergyandmoreimpurities
Economicalevaluationofthemix(feedsubstrates)
Additionalrequirements
1. 2. 3.
Impacton
1. 1 2. 3. 3 4.
Nutrientbalance N t i tb l Digestate quality Quantity&dewateringabilityofresidualsolids Quantity & dewatering ability of residual solids Processeconomics
SubstrateClassification
18
SubstrateClassification
Biogasyieldsfromplantconstituents(Braun2007)andslurries(Baserga 1998).
19
Study FeedMixture(Recipe)developmentforCoDigestionDigesters
Sponsoredby Sponsored by
Doneat
Studyplandevelopmentandtrialsupervision
AshwaniKumar,P.Eng. , g
Substrate&Recipetesting
1. 1 2. 3. 4.
PilotUnit Theconcept
Capacity 200LitWorking+100LitGasHolderVolume
GasSpace
LiquidSpace
GasFlowmeter
BasisofRecipeDesign:
1. Watersolubilityoftheorganics
2.SpecificNutrientratiossuchas OptimizedC:NratioandC:N:P:Sratio
3.Consistentfeedavailabilitythroughouttheyear.
5.Optimizedbiogasyieldbyselectingtherightmixoffat,proteinsandlipids.
Technicaloptimizationofthemix(feedsubstrates)
1. Differentmixtureformulation(recipe)isdonewithpreliminarydesktopreview basedonsubstrateavailabilityintheregionandpracticalfieldfeedback. 2. Theproposedrecipeisvalidatedandtweakedbasedontherecommendation ofthetechnologyprovider/experts. of the technology provider/experts. 3. Allindividualsubstratesaretestedforphysicalandchemicalpropertiesand arethendigestedtogetthebiomethanepotential(BMP)togetCH4yield/Kg ofVSfeed. 4. Recipeisdigestedina20litre benchscaledigestertooptimizethedigestion processandunderstandspecificrequirementsrelatedtotheparticularrecipe. process and nderstand specific req irements related to the partic lar recipe 5. Theprocessistransferredtothe200Litre pilotunittovalidatethedesign assumptions.
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00 28May 2Jun 7Jun 12Jun 17Jun 22Jun 27Jun 2Jul 7Jul 12Jul 17Jul 22Jul 27Jul 1Aug 6Aug 11Aug
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
0 28May09 30May09 1Jun09 3Jun09 5Jun09 7Jun09 9Jun09 11Jun09 13Jun09 15Jun09 17Jun09 19Jun09 21Jun09 23Jun09 25Jun09 27Jun09 29Jun09 1Jul09 3Jul09 5Jul09 7Jul09 9Jul09 11Jul09 13Jul09 15Jul09 17Jul09 19Jul09 21Jul09 23Jul09 25Jul09 27Jul09 29Jul09 31Jul09 2Aug09 4Aug09 6Aug09 8Aug09 10Aug09 12Aug09
Proteinrichwaste a. a Theyarebiologicalmacromolecules eithersolid(eg.hair,nails,feathers They are biological macromolecules either solid (eg hair nails feathers YoudontwanttobringthemtoyourAD)orsoluble. b. UnlikeCarbohydratehydrolysisthatfavours slightacidpH,Proteinhydrolysis requireaneutralorweeklyalkalinepH(McInerney 1988) c. UnlikeCarbohydrateFermentationthatlowerthepHduetoformationofVFA, fermentationofaminoacidsdonotleadtosignigicat changeinpHduetoacid andammoniaformation. d. Butmostimportantforprocess&operationis watchoutfor
Sulphur
29
&Nitrogen
SolidSeparationTrials
31
SolidSeparationTrials Th.designvs.Actual
Sl.#
Parameter
Suspendedsolids separationefficiency Suspendedsolidsin thefiltrate the filtrate Polymer ConsumptionNorm
Actual Performance
99+%
Comments
Thiswas repeatedon72literpilot testingusing100meshwinepress testing using 100 mesh wine press test
170mg/l 350g/m3
(13.4Kg/T S)
FerricSulphate Norm
1574g/m3
Digestate analysis
Parameter
(PhaseI) MaytoNov2009
(PhaseIII) StabilizedDigestate
BOD,mg/l
516
Totalsolids,mg/l
170
6550
42047
3 4 5
Ammonia Vs TIme
5.0
4000
4.5 3500 4.0 3000 Org ganic Loading (k VS/cu m) kg 3.5 Ammonia (mg/ /kg) 2500 3.0
2.5
2000
0.0 5/28/2009 6/28/2009 7/28/2009 8/28/2009 9/28/2009 TIme 10/28/2009 11/28/2009 12/28/2009
0 1/28/2010
Ammonia mg/kg
Waste Nodefinitiveboundary
Sample
Ash
Carbohydrates
Protein
Fat
Total Nitrogen
Ammonia
Blood
1.27%
7.98%
3.45%
2.00%
0.48%
765
Manure
0.76%
0.20%
17.49%
0.20%
0.44%
1980
ThereisnoBlackorWhiteSubstrate
35
Conclusion Recipe (Physio Chemicalchecks) a. Checkforavailability&handling b. Takearepresentativesampleanddo(oraskfor)sometests c. Ch k f N i CheckforNutrientBalance B l a. COD:N:P of350to100:7:1 b. RightC:Nofthemix(around20:1) d. Check for Toxicity (Antibiotics, Cation, Na+, Ammonia, Sulphides) , CheckforToxicity(Antibiotics,Cation,Na+,Ammonia,Sulphides), e. Checkforchemicalprecipitation(Calcium,Struvite)risks. f. Checkforheavymetals youdonotwantyourbiosolidstobeuntouchable
36
i. j.
ThankYou
38