Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Agenda Contents CPG SOLUTIONS OVERVIEW PLM DEFINITION & OVERVIEW ORACLES PLM SOLUTION PLM INTEGRATION & BEST PRACTICES LESSONS LEARNED CASE STUDY #1 CASE STUDY #2 QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
PLM Overview | Oct 2008 2
CPG SOLUTIONS
Company Description
CPG provides premium Oracle Applications based consulting services for mid-sized EMSC (Engineering, Manufacturing, Supply Chain) companies Founded: Industry Focus: Applications Focus: Integration Expertise: Client Base: Oracle Certifications: 1997 Mid-Market EMSC (Engineering, Manufacturing, Supply Chain) ERP & CRM and industry based applications: PLM, Shop Floor Control, CAD, Testing, and Bar-coding Solutions iLink - Oracle EBS PLM Integration Adapter U.S., Canada, China, Mexico Mid-Market Manufacturing & Distribution Companies Certified Implementation Partner Certified On Demand Partner
PLM Overview | Oct 2008 4
Documented benefits include: Reduced time to market Improved product quality Reduced prototyping costs Savings through the complete integration of data & workflows
PLM Overview | Oct 2008 6
Present
PLM extended Product Design to 3rd party Design Outsourcing Collaboration extended across the global chain to Customers & Suppliers Introduction of Industry & Government Standards Compliance Adoption of Collaborative Quality Improvement across the supply chain Adoption of Program/Project based PLM Portfolio Management Adoption of PLM Analytics and Intelligence for Cost/Process Analysis & Improv.
PLM Overview | Oct 2008 7
PLM Example: New Product Introduction Process Agenda High-Level Standard NPI Process
Idea Generation Service
Idea Screening
1 8
2 3
7
Commercial Production
4 6
Design & Prototype
5
Beta Testing & Market Testing
Technical Implementation
PLM Example: New Product Introduction Process Agenda High-Level Standard NPI Process
Customers Idea Generation Service Idea Screening
1 8
2 3
7
Commercial Production
4 6
Design & Prototype
5
Beta Testing & Market Testing Design Partners
Technical Implementation
Mfg Partners
10
Explosion of new products in market requires faster innovation cycles Tiered, global supply chains; escalating uptake of outsourced design & manufacturing partners Push for continued cost reduction, both in product and processes Increased demand for quality coupled with more stringent regulations
11
Component Reuse -- up to 30% Time to Market -- up to 60% Part Numbers -- up to 38% Development Spend -- up to 35% ECO Cycle Time -- up to 50% ECO Admin Expense -- up to 60% Design Errors & Re-Work -- up to 25%
Source: AMR Research, The Value of PLM and How to Get It
12
Supply Coordination
Component Mgmt Supplier Change Mgmt Direct Material Sourcing Quality Mgmt
13
14
Supply Coordination
Agile Product Collaboration Agile Product Gov. & Compliance Agile Product Cost Management Agile Product Quality Management Agile Product Portfolio Management
Agile Engineering Collaboration Agile Engineering Data Management AutoVue Electro-Mechanical Prof. for Agile Agile Product Lifecycle Mgmt Datamart Agile Product Lifecycle Mgmt Bus. Intelligence
PLM Overview | Oct 2008 15
Concept
Develop
Prototype / Pilot
NPI / Ramp
Volume Mfg
Service / Phase-Out
Accurately control and track product changes via workflow-driven processes Generate rich product catalogs to store, aggregate, and share technical content Provide secure, web-based internal and external access to product information
16
Mktg
Engr
QA
Mfg
Control intellectual property -provide role-based partner access to product and project data securely stored within Enterprise Product Record
Coordinated Common set of projects execution via and deliverables Collaborative Concepts, designs, prodprocesses for uction issues, alternatives
the development process to improve quality, lower costs, and accelerate time to market / volume
PLM Overview | Oct 2008 17
Customers
Survey Targets
Channels
Conduct proactive,
Subjective Likes / Dislikes
Direct
Collect improvement
Loyalty Data
Phone
18
Drive proactive quality improvement initiatives Leverage quality history to improve products
19
Potential Projects
Scenarios
Portfolio
Program
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
Resource
Resource
Resource
20
Audit Compliance
Corporate:
ISO 9000 / 14000,
Industry Specific:
DoD, US FDA,
21
PLM INTEGRATION
22
Compliance Check
Material Inventory
Compare
Bu ild
Ch e ck
Content Deviations
PLM-ERP Integration
iLink: Simplifying PLM Integration
CPG has developed the iLink PLM Adapter that connects leading PLM, Applications including the Agile Suite to Oracle ERP Applications
Enterprise
PDM
EBusiness Suite
TQM
Seibel CRM
Transport Middleware
CRM
24
Operations
PLM-ERP Integration
Item, BOM, ECO info
Parts Master
Inventory
Operations
25
APC BOMS
BOMs, Substitute Comp, Reference Designators
BOM
AML
Purchasing
Change Master
Engineering
Clearly define Process & Data Owners Case Study Example #1 Design Multi-Org Filtering & Propagation Rules Case Study Example #2 Remove Unnecessary Manual Intervention in Oracle True Integration Design Your Revision Scheme Understand the Constraints Design PLM Lifecycle & ERP Item Status Mappings Status Mgt. Design ECO Implementation & Phase-In/Phase-Out Process Define Your Substitute/Alternate Parts Process Not an afterthought Make sure you map Parts Categories/Classifications - Analytics
Ensure User-enable Dynamic Mapping Remove IT from Daily Maint. 10. Ensure User-Friendly Error Notif. & Handling Remove IT from Daily Maint.
26
27
Symptoms
2. 3.
Initially, complaint was poor service/support levels from IT (>20 calls per day with delayed response) Part/BOM/Rev not being propagated correctly to multiple orgs. Bad synchronization of Ref Design. causing Prod Quality issues
Actual Problem
Upon analysis, integration did not follow best practices: Integration was hard-coded no mapping capability Company has quadrupled in size since the initial installation IT could not keep up with changes & ended up with spaghetti code Implemented iLink and stressed the use of Dynamic Mapping: Org propagation driven my mapping tables no hard coding Data synchronization for new data at 100% after 3 months Support calls dropped to 1/week resolved within 24 hours The company initially thought the issue was with IT support. Bad design causes bad support. Good design leads to improved service.
PLM Overview | Oct 2008 28
Results
Symptoms
2. 3.
Lots of constraints put on Agile because of the integration (mixing design & prod parts) Lots of Manual Intervention in both Agile & Oracle (ex. Lifecycle) Lack of confidence in data synch accuracy in both systems
Actual Problem
Upon analysis, the issue was not technical, but design/process in nature: Continued use of Oracle Engineering defeated PLM ownership rule Lack of understanding of Data Ownership (ex. BOM enabled flag) No consistency in Revision scheme Redesigned design processes by: Taking total ownership of design process back to PLM from ERP Clearly defining data ownership between systems Redefined revision scheme mapping With the process changes, implemented iLink and fully synch both systems iLink removed all technical constraints from the designers in Agile. A huge win for the organization
PLM Overview | Oct 2008 29
Results
30
THANK YOU
31