Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
On November 17th and 18th 2001 a congress on “Ethics and Law in Resuscitation”
was held in Krakow (Poland). It was a joint scientific meeting of the European
Resuscitation Council and the Polish Resuscitation Council, which was launched
during the opening of the symposium. The scientific programme covered several
important ethical and legal aspects in resuscitation. Some of the outstanding
presentations of the congress are summarised below.
There are never enough means to finance everything that is feasible and desirable.
In his lecture on “Cost implications of resuscitation” Bahr (Goettingen, Germany)
pointed out that concerning health care systems the limited financial resources in our
societies have a special dimension, since health is one of the greatest goods.
Therefore, talking about cost implications of resuscitation needs to talk about cost
implications of the entire health care system. If there is not enough money for
everything, then we have to talk about allocation and rationalisation. Rationalisation
is neither good nor bad. The objective is that there is enough for other – potential –
patients as well who also have the right of being treated appropriately. From an
ethical point of view rationalisation in a health care system is permitted and –
furthermore – necessary, having in mind the principle of justice.
Rationalisation may be direct. This means that there are effects on the concrete
case. The contrast is an indirect rationalisation, aiming at the statistical or potential
patient. Of course actual duties always are more important than potential duties, and
it would be ethically not acceptable to withhold any actual obligation only to keep the
chances for a potential one. From an ethical point of view we have to state that
rationalisation may never be carried out on an actual patient.
Rationalisation is called strong when it is impossible to purchase compensating
health goods, whereas a weak rationalisation includes the possibility for individuals to
buy health care goods for compensating the effects. Rationalisation is called open if it
has been made transparent by broad social processes and, thus, can be accepted
more easily. Covered rationalisation is intransparent and cutbacks have not been
discussed.
The distress belonging to the decision-making process in rationalisation can only be
coped with in a human way if the decision is shifted to the planning level, far away
from the concrete patient. So the decision does not affect an individual patient but
only the probability for all members of society to die earlier because a specific
therapy is not available. It is not inconsequent to reject an investment as long as only
statistical lives are affected; probabilities have a price. An individual human life has
no price, and in case of danger each individual life has to be saved. Bahr
demonstrated the potential consequences of rationalisation by an example related to
resuscitation: If you are resuscitating a concrete patient you have to bring into play
every means you have in trying to save this patient’s life. But if the next day you are
asked by your government whether a certain amount of money should be spent for
buying new devices, that it would be justified to say no in favour of for example a
prevention programme.
Ethical and legal aspects of resus citation are also in the centre of Christian`s
reflection. In the last paper of the symposium on „Religious Aspects of
Resuscitation” Fr. Muszala from the Institute of Bioethics at the Papal Academy of
Theology in Krakow presented the problem from the point of view of Catholic ethics.
The Christians, according to God’s order „Thou shalt not kill” have always taken great
care of human life, especially in the state of danger and dying (e.g. in the parable
about Good Samaritan). Also today the Catholic Church pronounces „the Gospel of
Life” and appeals to respect, defend and serve the life. In the matter of resuscitation
there are some important texts contained in the declarations (Iura et bona, 1980, and
Dichiarazione circa il Prolungamento,1985) containing fundamental theses of
Catholic bioethics referring to the subject. Everyone has the duty to take care of his
own health and take the treatment. Those who look after the sick should use
„proportional” means, i.e. the ones that are widely used, give hope for success and
are not followed with non-proportional costs that would give little chance for success,
and are applied in the just way. A physician is not obliged to use extraordinary and
non-proportional means; in such cases he should adjust to the will of the sick. In the
last part the speaker noticed the significant role of the spiritual father who cares of a
patient’s soul just as much as physicians care of his body. The final goal of human
being is to enter the heavenly kingdom, and a physician is not obliged to save the
patient’s life „at any price”; a person leaving this world has the right to live his death
in such a way as he wishes, surrounded by his relatives and spiritual father.
At the Krakow meeting a rather new but very much live experience how to attract an
audience to the sometimes rather abstract issue of ethics were three so called
“What-If-Sessions”. The chairmen Baskett (Bristol), Bossaert (Antwerp) and Mohr
(Goettingen) had prepared some histories and presented in a step by step fashion
cases from the resuscitative and intensive care scene. The audience was taken
through the different scenarios and was asked at various points what they would do.
The participants had the opportunity to express and to discuss different suggestions
how to proceed. The questions put to the audience led to spontaneous answers and
to an enthusiastic and sometimes controversial discussion. The topics covered in the
“What-if-sessions” were to start or not to start, to stop or not to stop CPR, futility
factors in DNAR, Jehovah’s witnesses, under age consent for operation, under age
organ donation, withholding or withdrawing treatment, and palliative care on the ICU.
The format of the interactive “What-If-Session” was a very positive experience and
seems to be worthwhile to be continued during future meetings.
All of us who joined the congress in Krakow had the feeling that the meeting was a
great success. It marked the start of the Polish Resuscitation Council, and the
discussions on ethics were very interesting and stimulating. Some of the scientific
material might be included in the ERC 2002 congress in Firence.
Authors:
Mohr M1 , Bahr J1, Kettler D 1, Andres J 2
1
Dep. of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine
University Hospital of Goettingen
2
Dep. of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
University Hospital of Krakow