Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Introduction
In this report Class A prediction of the 5th LRI (Liquefaction Remediation Initiative) centrifuge test (LRICT5) is presented and discussed. The recalibrated soil parameters, used in class A prediction of the LRICT4 centrifuge experiment, have been used to predict the behavior of soil due to seismic loads.
Soil properties
Regarding loose sand and drainage dyke the same material properties, previously used in class A prediction of LRICT4, have been used in class A prediction of LRICT5. It is mentioned that there has been no relevant information on the silt and only general test results have been made available for the gravel; therefore, the required constitutive parameters have been estimated based on engineering judgment and previous experience
with similar materials. Table 1 includes the assumed set of soil properties of silt used in this class A prediction. Hydraulic conductivity of silt is considered to be 1/100 of the hydraulic conductivity of loose sand, as used by UBC in their class A predictions for COSTA-B. The material properties of sand and drainage dyke were reported in class A prediction of LRICT4.
Constitutive parameters Mass density (kg/m3) Porosity Hydraulic conductivity (permeability) (cm/s) Low-strain shear modulus (Mpa) Reference effective mean normal stress Powe exponent Poisson ratio Friction angle at failure Coefficient of lateral earth pressure at rest Soil cohesion Maximum deviatoric strain (C= compression, E=extension) Dilation angle (phase transformation angle) Dilation parameter Symbol s
n
w
Assumed Values 2670 0.448 0.000084 2 100 0.8 0.4 22o 1 0 0.10 (C), 0.10 (E) 17o 0.04
k
G0
p0
k0 c
max dev
Yield Parameters
X PP
Dilation Parameters
values below the U/S region move upwards towards the silt layer. In the D/S region pore pressures are predicted to dissipate after the end of shaking (t >20 s). Figures 11 to 33 show the predicted responses at different transducers. It is mentioned that LVDT2 measures displacement time history in a direction parallel to the silt layer. Up to about 0.25 m heave is predicted at LVDT4 location (Figure 14). As discussed earlier in the free field, U/S of the drainage dykes, e.g. EPP5, remarkably large excess pore water pressure generation is predicted after the end of shaking, and it results in occurring of liquefaction in that area as shown in Figure 19. The numerical model predicts significant dilation (i.e. large negative excess pore water pressures) between t= 12 s and t= 17s, especially at very shallow locations (EPP4, EPP5, EPP8 and EPP9).
Figure 5. Predicted maximum shear strain contours at t=42.56 s (Deformed shape magnification factor= 1)
Figure 10. Predicted excess pore water pressure ratio contours at t=42.56 s
L V D T 1 tim e h is to r y 0 .0 5 0 -0 .0 5 Displacement ( m ) -0 .1 -0 .1 5 -0 .2 -0 .2 5 -0 .3 -0 .3 5 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 T im e ( s ) 4 0 5 0
10
20 30 T im e ( s )
40
50
Figure 12. Predicted total displacement time history at LVDT2 along the silt layer 8
L V D T 3 tim e h is to r y 0 .0 5 0 -0 .0 5 Displacement ( m ) -0 .1 -0 .1 5 -0 .2 -0 .2 5 -0 .3 -0 .3 5 -0 .4 0 10 20 30 T im e ( s ) 40 50
1 0
2 0 T im e
3 0 ( s )
4 0
5 0
IEVS=50 KPa
Figure 15. Predicted excess pore water pressure ratio time history at EPP1
P o r e P r e s s u r e R a tio t im e h is to r y a t E P P 2 0 .7 0 .6 0 .5 0 .4 RU 0 .3 0 .2 0 .1 0 -0 .1 0 10 20 30 T im e ( s ) 40 50
IEVS=121 KPa
Figure 16. Predicted excess pore water pressure ratio time history at EPP2
P o r e P r e s s u r e R a tio t im e h is to r y a t E P P 3 0 .7 0 .6 0 .5 0 .4 RU 0 .3 0 .2 0 .1 0 -0 .1 -0 .2 0 10 20 30 T im e ( s ) 40 50
IEVS=88.5 KPa
Figure 17. Predicted excess pore water pressure ratio time history at EPP3
P o r e P r e s s u r e R a tio t im e h is to r y a t E P P 4 2 0 -2 RU -4 -6 -8 -1 0
IEVS=12 KPa
1 0
2 0 3 0 T im e ( s )
4 0
5 0
Figure 18. Predicted excess pore water pressure ratio time history at EPP4
10
P o r e P r e s s u r e R a tio t im e h is to r y a t E P P 5 1
0 .5
0 RU -0 .5
-1
IEVS=31 KPa
-1 .5
1 0
2 0 3 0 T im e ( s )
4 0
5 0
Figure 19. Predicted excess pore water pressure ratio time history at EPP5
P o r e P r e s s u r e R a tio t im e h is to r y a t E P P 6 0 .4 0 .3 0 .2 0 .1 RU 0 -0 .1 -0 .2 -0 .3 -0 .4 -0 .5 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 T im e ( s ) 4 0 5 0
IEVS=47 KPa
Figure 20. Predicted excess pore water pressure ratio time history at EPP6
P o re 0 .4 0 .2 0 -0 .2 RU -0 .4 -0 .6 -0 .8 -1 P re s s u re R a tio tim e h is to r y a t E P P 7
IEVS=44 KPa
1 0
2 0 T im e
( s
3 0 )
4 0
5 0
Figure 21. Predicted excess pore water pressure ratio time history at EPP7
11
P o r e P r e s s u r e R a tio t im e h is to r y a t E P P 8 0 .5 0 -0 .5 -1 RU -1 .5 -2 -2 .5 -3 -3 .5 -4 0 10 20 30 T im e ( s ) 40 50
IEVS=15 KPa
Figure 22. Predicted excess pore water pressure ratio time history at EPP8
P o r e P r e s s u r e R a tio t im e h is to r y a t E P P 9 1 0 .5 0 RU -0 .5 -1 -1 .5 -2
IEVS=15 KPa
0 1 0 2 0 3 0 T im e ( s ) 4 0 5 0
Figure 23. Predicted excess pore water pressure ratio time history at EPP9
A c c e le r a tio n tim e h is to r y a t A C C 0 1 4 3 Acceleration ( m / s2 ) 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 T im e ( s ) 4 0 5 0
12
1 0
2 0 3 0 T im e ( s )
4 0
5 0
13
Acceleration ( m / s2 )
-5
10
20 30 T im e ( s )
40
5 0
14
Acceleration ( m / s2 )
-5
1 0
2 0 3 0 T im e ( s )
4 0
5 0
15