Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
http://free-report.technologyevaluation.com/reports/report_print.asp
ERP for Services Competitor Rating Analysis for Dynamics SL (7.0) by Microsoft, E-Business Suite (12) by Oracle, SAP Business All-in-One (ERP 6.0 EHP5) by SAP
The graphs below were developed as a high-level competitive rating analysis of Dynamics SL (7.0) by Microsoft, E-Business Suite (12) by Oracle, SAP Business All-in-One (ERP 6.0 EHP5) by SAP. They display the standard scores of the vendor's solution, as determined through TEC's default ERP for Services model. The graphs reflect 3916 functional, technical, and business criteria. This comparison is based on average weights and priorities. For a detailed comparison based on your specific requirements click the "Detailed Analysis" button above.
Overall Performance
Product Technology
Module
426
58
96.53
95.42
77
50.52
95.58
96.88
303
40
96.67
97.69
122
54.75
96.15
99.75
78
85.64
100
100
441
45.65
96.64
96.98
43
55.35
75.81
100
1677
82.21
98.06
99.38
426
60.16
76.1
92.16
1 de 7
http://free-report.technologyevaluation.com/reports/report_print.asp
appropriately, and adjust projects to produce the highest departmental returns. As its name implies, project portfolio management groups projects so that they can be managed, the same way an investor would manage stocks, bonds, and mutual funds.
Module
278
70
95.94
95.18
66.67
100
95
27
0.37
95.56
92.59
16
20.62
100
96.25
17
1.18
98.24
100
20
100
100
13
100
100
2 de 7
http://free-report.technologyevaluation.com/reports/report_print.asp
Module
35
56.57
96
100
10
77
100
94
90
100
100
100
100
76
100
100
100
100
12
25
93.33
85
3 de 7
http://free-report.technologyevaluation.com/reports/report_print.asp
Module
57
40
97.02
98.25
30
40
94.67
100
138
40
96.52
95.65
19
40
100
100
14
40
100
100
45
40
95.56
100
Module
64
45.47
95.31
100
Module
Total Criteria
4 de 7
http://free-report.technologyevaluation.com/reports/report_print.asp
Module Rating BUDGETING AND TRANSACTIONS Includes:Association of project budgets to multiple clients or departments; Tracking and support of multiple currencies; Flexible transaction controls for expenditures and resources; Summary and detailed budget capabilities; Budgetary controls that verify available project funds; Ability to enforce hard or soft controls; and others PROJECT BILLING Includes:Multiclient billing and invoicing; Creation of project billable rates; Lock down of projects and tasks as billable and non-billable; Ability to set individual billable hourly targets; Setup of billing details, including customer information and billing cycles; Definition of billing methods types for different projects; and others INVOICE GENERATION Includes:Generation of invoices based on milestones; Flexible invoice formats that include a summary of line items and tasks; Review and adjustment of invoices; Invoice detail drill down feature; Generation of interproject invoices to share costs and revenue; PROJECT COSTING Includes:Expenditures; Allocations and Burdening; Project Costing Adjustments; CAPITAL ASSETS Includes:Creation of capital assets; Placement of assets in service and capitalization of CIP assets costs; Calculation of capital interest; Processing of proceeds from sale; RESOURCE SHARING Includes:Definition of multiple resource sharing types; Configuration of resource sharing methods; Setup of resource sharing controls; Creation of multiple resource costs and rates across projects and time;
Module Rating
Module Rating
16
92.5
100
100
22
94.55
100
100
78
100
100
27
92.22
100
100
40
100
100
20
100
100
Module
153
72.29
98.43
97.39
13
28.46
100
100
275
31.64
95.49
96.62
5 de 7
http://free-report.technologyevaluation.com/reports/report_print.asp
Module Total Criteria PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPLICATION Includes:Integration with Microsoft Project 98, 2000, and 2003; Updating of either approved or all task hours in Microsoft Project; Updating of task hours within a date range or the project's start and end dates in Microsoft Project; Updating of project or task information in Microsoft Project; Updating of project resource task assignments in Microsoft Project; Updating of project resources in Microsoft Project when creating new users in time sheet if users do not exist; and others ERP, ACCOUNTING, AND PAYROLL Includes:Features; Vendors;
12
72.5
100
100
31
48.71
66.45
100
Back-Office Functionality
Back-Office Functionality Modules Ratings
Module
962
90.11
98.88
99.9
447
65.82
97.2
98.7
268
81.19
96.57
98.66
Product Technology
This group of criteria defines the technical architecture of the product as well as the technological environment in which the product can run successfully. Criteria include product and application architecture, software usability and administration, platform and database support, application standards support, communications and protocol support and integration capabilities. Relative to the other evaluation criteria, best practice selections place a lower relative importance on the product technology criterion. This apparently lower importance is deceptive because the product technology usually houses the majority of the selecting organization's mandatory criteria, which generally include server, client, protocol and database support, application scalability, and other architectural capabilities. The definition of mandatory criteria within this set often allows the client to quickly narrow the long list of potential vendors to a short list of applicable solutions that pass muster relative to the most basic mandatory selection criteria.
Module
20
65
70
92
366
56.89
76.94
91.56
6 de 7
http://free-report.technologyevaluation.com/reports/report_print.asp
CROSS-MODULE FEATURES Includes:Saves reports as templates for reuse; Shares template reports with other users; Reports on custom data; Configures look-up tables; Event viewer; Configurable interface and login page; and others
25
86.8
80.8
96.8
7 de 7