Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
An effective set of interlocking indicators provides feedback to individuals, groups, and the enterprise, directing the behavior of all. By Anthony McNeeney, Meridium Measures of performance have been used by management for centuries to review current operational capabilities. Such measures have been used to assess both departmental and corporate performance, as well as trend performance achieved against plan. In many industrial facilities, these measurements are related to safety (number of incidents), environmental (number of releases), costs (percentage of departmental budgets used), and production (comparison of actual vs targeted production output). These measures are needed in order to determine not only if resources and costs have been managed for the production achieved, but also whether the assets or plant remain in good health. Clearly, these measures provide assurance that asset policies in place today do not limit capabilities for tomorrow. In order to define a complete set of performance measures, companies must ensure that simple, workable measures are in place. The real challenge is not only to select those indicators that satisfy budgetary goals, but also to build the activities needed to meet the levels of asset performance required to meet strategic goals. Selecting the right measures is vital for effectiveness. Even more importantly, the metrics must be built into a performance measurement system that allows individuals and groups to understand how their behaviors and activities are fulfilling the overall corporate goals.
Goals: Reduce operating Goals: Maximize uptime; Goals: Minimize costs and risks; preserve plant and asset corrective work; restore maximize output integrity asset condition
Strategic KPI Plant availability Number LPO events Time operatingoutside deterioration limits, percent Plant uptime, percent Production targetcompliance
Strategic KPI Plant availability Proactive work orders, percent Emergency work orders on high critical systems, percent Significant deterioration mechanisms improvements Inspection compliance Protective device schedule compliance Quantified reliability target, number Predictive maintenance compliance Operational KPI MTBF by equipment type, area MTBR by equipment type, area MTBM by equipment type, area MTBF growth Cumulative nonavailability of critical assets Unscheduled maintenance events, number Completed work order records on significant failures,
Strategic KPI Planning compliance Work order complete (within 20 percent of planned costs) Proactive work orders, percent Scheduling compliance Assessments of work order complete, number Quantified availability targets, number
Operational KPI Process availability variance Utility variance Product transfer indicator Quality limit excursions, number Actual counter measures, number Startup indicators Shutdown indicators Offspec product Scrap value Inventory
Operational KPI Emergency work orders, percent Reactive work orders, percent Backlog work orders, number Overtime hours, percent Work orders planned, number Cumulative maintenance costs for standing order Average direct cost per maintenance event Work orders
Operational KPI Outstanding items from monthly safety inspection report, number E&S A incidents, number E&S B incidents, number E&S C incidents, number Total days lost days due to injury PHA action items
number Bad actor count Current mechanical availability Mechanical availability trend
scheduled, number Rework, percent Closed work orders within 2 days of schedule, percent