Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Insensitive Munition Compliance Is Main Focus Improved Warhead and Fuze Lethality Improved MIL-STD 1316 Fuze Program Ends in FY05 with TRL 6 Prototype Designs and Supporting Test Data Low Risk Transition to APKWS Block II SDD
Next Step:
APKWS Block II Warhead and Fuze Program Will Provide the Capability to Defeat the Current and Evolving Threat
Fragmentation Tests M151 Modified With Preformed Tungsten Cubes Embedded Fragmentation Warhead
Tandem Blast Frag / SC Shaped Charge and Blast Fragmentation Tandem Warhead Various Configurations
TBX / Enhanced Blast Tests Evaluation of Several TBX Fills From Industry Pressure, Temperature, and Fragmentation Data M151 Warhead Bodies
Pressure & Temperature Fragment Velocity Fragment Mass and Spatial Distribution Number of Fragments
Data Will Be Available to Industry Evaluate TBX Fragment Driving Capability Comp B, PBXN-109, and PBXN-110 Tested as Baselines
AMRDEC AMRDEC AMRDEC AMRDEC Picatinny Picatinny EBA&D ATK ATK Talley Navy Navy Comp B PBXN-109 PBXN-110 RAX-16 PAX-28 PAX-3 YJ-05 NIX-G TEPX-D 3 fills CLAP 1 C133
Company/Organization
AMRDEC Baseline (Current M151 Fill) AMRDEC Baseline AMRDEC Baseline American Ordnance Iowa \ Picatinny Alliant Techsystems \ Picatinny Alliant Techsystems Talley Defense Systems Talley Defense Systems Talley Defense Systems NAVY (NAVAIR, China Lake) NAVY (NAVAIR, China Lake) Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense ARDEC Picatinny AMRDEC
Explosive Fill
Comp B PBXN-109 PBXN-110 PAX-3 NIX-G TEPX-D 7164 7172 7174 CLAP CL133 YJ-05 PAX-28 RAX-16
Test Date
3/17/2004 4/6/2004 6/2/2004 4/20/2004 4/19/2004 4/22/2004 5/11/2004 5/12/2004 5/27/2004 4/28/2004 5/25/2004 4/7/2004 4/27/2004 4/5/2004
Peak Pressure (psi) at 10 feet 23.33 20.50 20.21 20.20 18.21 17.38 16.92 15.86 14.87 13.88 13.34 11.44 9.91 9.45
Peak Pressure Recorded at Closest Pressure Transducer 10 Feet from Warhead Explosives named A-L Based upon Peak Pressure Data Rank Same Nomenclature used for Remaining Comparisons Fielded M151 Explosive is Comp B
Baselines
Temperature Data
Explosive Temperature Increase at 10 (oF) 20.48 19.42 17.82 17.24 14.87 13.39 12.14 9.50 9.17 8.86 5.16 Gage Malfunction Gage Malfunction Gage Malfunction
Temperature Increase Recorded at Closest Sensor Pressure and Temperature Effects not on same Trend
J H PBXN-109 A E I C
K B D F PBXN-110 Comp B
2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 Time (s) 2.9 3 3.1 3.2 3.3
115
T em p eratu re (F )
90 85 80
Heat Flux at 10 (W/cm2-s) 7.09 5.32 4.66 4.57 3.49 3.10 2.66 2.62 2.35 2.07 1.99 1.86 Gage Malfunction Gage Malfunction
K A B C I Comp B
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Time (s) 0.8 1 1.2
PBXN-110
Fragment Velocities
Explosive Average Fragment Velocity (m/s) 1580 1579 1566 1542 1502 1449 1430 1372 1365 1346 1336 1213 1174 1109
Frag Velocity by Explosive
2500 Velocity (m/s)
Velocities Measured via Phantom High Speed Video Min, Max, & Avg Velocities Calculated The Best Performers in Pressure were Also the Best at Driving Fragments
2000
1500
PBXN-110
500
Comp B
1000
Explosive Type
PBXN-109
# of Fragment Perforations
Explosive A B PBXN-110 C Comp B H F G K J D PBXN-109 E I
05-0025 NDIA, Slide 14 05-0025 NDIA, Slide 14
Number of Perforations 564 523 493 441 396 378 368 347 333 326 324 315 268 155
No Data, (Estimate)
05-0025 NDIA, Slide 15 05-0025 NDIA, Slide 15
Each Measured Characteristic Given an even Weighting 80% of Candidate Explosive Fills Exceeded Baselines Ranking may be different depending on desired application This Testing Demonstrated that Many Enhanced Blast (i.e. TBX) Explosives Maintain Adequate Fragment Driving Characteristics