Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1 023
R-GSM 900 Fl(n) = 890 + 0.2*n 0
1023
DCS 1 800 Fl(n) = 1710.2 + 0.2*(n-512) 512
3 4
3
4
DCS 1 800 &
PCS 1 900
Power
class
Tolerance (dB)
for conditions
GSM 400 and
GSM 900 & GSM
850 & GSM 700
Nominal
Maximum
output Power
Nominal
Maximum
output Power
Tolerance (dB)
for conditions
Nominal
Maximum
output Power
Tolerance (dB)
for conditions
Power
class
Nominal
Maximum
Nominal
Maximum
Nominal
Maximum
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 84
MS Power Control levels
norma
l
extrem
e
norma
l
extrem
e
0-2 39 2 2,5 29 36 2 2,5
3 37 3 4 30 34 3 4
4 35 3 4 31 32 3 4
5 33 3 4 0 30 3 4
6 31 3 4 1 28 3 4
7 29 3 4 2 26 3 4
8 27 3 4 3 24 3 4
9 25 3 4 4 22 3 4
10 23 3 4 5 20 3 4
11 21 3 4 6 18 3 4
12 19 3 4 7 16 3 4
13 17 3 4 8 14 3 4
14 15 3 4 9 12 4 5
15 13 3 4 10 10 4 5
16 11 5 6 11 8 4 5
17 9 5 6 12 6 4 5
18 7 5 6 13 4 4 5
19-31 5 5 6 14 2 5 6
15-28 0 5 6
GSM 900
Tolerance (dB)
for conditions
Power
control
level
Nominal
Output
power
(dBm)
DCS 1 800
Tolerance (dB)
for conditions
Power
control
level
Nominal
Output
power
(dBm)
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 85
BTS Power Control Levels
BTS actual power level is
Max. power (dBm) 2*N (i.e. 2dB at a time)
TRX
power
class
Maximum
output power
TRX
power
class
Maximum
output power
Micro Micro
1 320 - (< 640) W 1 20 - (< 40) W M1 (> 19) - 24 dBm M1 (> 27) - 32 dBm
2 160 - (< 320) W 2 10 - (< 20) W M2 (> 14) - 19 dBm M2 (> 22) - 27 dBm
3 80 - (< 160) W 3 5 - (< 10) W M3 (> 9) - 14 dBm M3 (> 17) - 22 dBm
4 40 - (< 80) W 4 2,5 - (< 5) W Pico Pico
5 20 - (< 40) W P1 (> 13) - 20 dBm P1 (> 16) - 23 dBm
6 10 - (< 20) W
7 5 - (< 10) W
8 2,5 - (< 5) W
Maximum
output power
Maximum
output power
TRX
power
class
TRX
power
class
For a normal BTS, the maximum output power
measured at the input of the BSS Tx combiner
For a micro-BTS or a pico-BTS, the maximum output
power per carrier measured at the antenna connector
after all stages of combining
GSM 900 & GSM 850 &
MXM 850 and GSM 700
DCS 1 800 & PCS 1 900
& MXM 1900 micro and
GSM 400 & GSM 900 &
GSM 850 & MXM 850
DCS 1 800 & PCS 1 900
& MXM 1900
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 86
Effect of DTX and PC on Quality
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
7.00%
8.00%
9.00%
10.00%
0 10 20 30 40
Time (hours)
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
%HOIU
%HOID
DTX + PC Off
PC Off
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 87
Radio Link Measurements
RxLev (in GSM units: reports signal strength
above 110dBm maximum 63 i.e. 47dBm
RxQual
RxQual BER (%)
0 <0.2%
1 0.2% -0.4%
2 0.4%-0.8%
3 0.8%-1.6%
4 1.6%-3.2%
5 3.2%-6.4%
6 6.4%-12.8%
7 >12.8%
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 88
Radio Link Measurements
The Mobile reports to the BSC (via the BTS) every
SACCH period (480ms):
o Serving Cell Signal Strength (on allocated TCH)
o Serving Cell Signal Quality
o BCCH, BSIC and RxLev of the 6 strongest neighbours
The BTS reports to the BSC
o The Signal Strength from the Mobile
o The Signal Quality from the Mobile
o The BTS power control level
o The MS power control level
o The TA (timing Advance)
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 89
Handovers
A handover is initiated when
o A Neighbour Cell exceeds the signal strength of
the serving Cell with CRH for more than the
specified period (e.g. 5 Seconds)
o Excessive Timing Advance occurs
o The Signal Strength (uplink or downlink) drops
below a said minimum
o The signal quality (uplink or downlink) drops
below a said minimum
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 90
Handover
The BSC contains the following info
o Traffic Measurements for each Cell
o Cell list with CGI, BCCH frequency, BSIC &
TxPower
o Neighbour list for each Cell with
CGI, BCCH & BSIC and CRH (Cell Reselection
Hysteresis) and other handover parameters
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 91
Frequency Hopping
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Downlink C
1
Uplink C
1
N N + 1
TDMA frame no.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Downlink C
2
Uplink C
2
N N + 1
TDMA frame no.
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 92
Frequency Diversity
Raleigh fading is frequency dependant
f
0
f
1
Position
S
i
g
n
a
l
l
e
v
e
l
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 93
Frequency Diversity
Diversity: combining two or more
uncorrelated versions of the same signal
For conventional frequency diversity the info
is sent on two different frequencies at the
same time.
To be uncorrelated the two frequencies
should be more than 1/(multi-path spread),
where the multi-path spread is dependant on
the environment.
For urban areas the frequencies should be
more than 600kHz apart
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 94
Base Band Frequency Hopping
Controller
CALL 2
Tx and Rx on f
1
Controller
CALL 3
Controller
CALL 4
Controller
CALL 1
Tx and Rx on f
2
Tx and Rx on f
3
Tx and Rx on f
0
Baseband Bus
for routing bursts
C
o
m
b
i
n
e
r
f
1
f
2
f
3
f
0
f
0
f
1
f
2
f
3
f
2
f
3
f
0
f
1
f
3
f
0
f
1
f
2
Number of frequencies equal to number of transceivers Number of frequencies equal to number of transceivers
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 95
Synthesised Hopping
Controller
CALL 2
Tx and Rx hopping
Controller
CALL 3
Controller
CALL 4
Controller
CALL 1
Tx and Rx hopping
Tx and Rx hopping
Tx and Rx hopping
f
1
f
2
f
3
f
0
f
0
f
1
f
2
f
3
f
2
f
3
f
0
f
1
f
3
f
0
f
1
f
2
Number of frequencies more or equal Number of frequencies more or equal
to number of transceivers to number of transceivers
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 96
Why does hopping work?
Review interleaving
If one timeslot gets completely lost during
transmission 1/8 of two speech frames are lost.
At the receiver the speech frames are de-interleaved
The channel coding can recover from the 12.5%
BER.
Interleaving and Channel Coding is part and parcel
of the GSM standard - it works even without hopping.
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 97
Interleaving and Channel
Coding work always
FER and SQI vs.RxQual
-10
0
10
20
30
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
RxQual
S
Q
I
/
%
F
E
R
Non-Hopping (calls on BCCH-carrier)
Non-Hopping (calls on BCCH-carrier)
Hopping with 20% load
Hopping with 20% load
FER
SQI
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 98
Synthesized hopping
Synthesised hopping provides:
o Higher capacity for the same quality.
o Simplified frequency planning.
o Can implement new transceivers without new
frequency plans
But
o It costs more
o Can not be implemented with filter combiners - might
impose limit on #TRX/cell
o Complications with implementation combined with
Base Band hopping
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 99
Base-band hopping
Base band hopping provides:
o Lower cost
o Some frequency diversity gain
o Can be implemented on all equipment
o Hence no limit on number of TRXs
But
o Require frequency plan with upgrade
o More complex planning
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 100
Frequency Diversity Gain
Frequency Diversity Gain vs Number of Hopping Channels
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Number of Carriers
G
a
i
n
(
d
B
)
Cyclic Random Poly. (Cyclic) Poly. (Random)
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 101
Interference Diversity
Extent of Interference diversity depends on:
o Interference load (DTX and Power Control)
o Frequency reuse: low re-use -> low gain;
Dependant on area type.
o Number of Frequencies (less -> less gain)
o Cyclic or Random
Interference diversity gain reached with 25%
load, 12 frequencies in Urban area with
random hopping is 2.5dB - mostly it is less.
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 102
Co-channel interference
D
The total co-channel
interference experienced at
the yellow spot is the sum of
interference of all six cells
with the same frequency
The interference from one
co-channel interferer can be
written as
I =KD
-
The carrier level is
C= KR
-
C/I = (D/R)
/6
R
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 103
Re-use distance
v
30
u
D
D = (i
2
+ ij + j
2
)
2Rcos 30
D = (i
2
+ ij + j
2
)
(3)
R
Number of cells in the
re-use pattern
N = i
2
+ ij + j
2
i (1,2,3,4 ..)
j (0,1,2,3,4 ..)
D/R = (3N)
i
j
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 104
The Hexagon
Area of a hexagon:
A = . 3 (3)
R
2
Distance between centers
of two adjacent cells:
d = (3)
R
R
d
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 105
Traffic calculations revision
An Erlang
Erlang B Table
Examples of Traffic channels
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 106
Problem
The average traffic generated by one user is
10milliErlang/Subscriber
The population density is 50 people/km
2
Assume a phone penetration of 80%
You are implementing a CS-2 system.
You have 48 (1-48)channels available
Assume free-space propagation i.e. = 2
Draw the re-use pattern and assign frequencies to
the cells.
Calculate the site to site distance that you will
need to implement.
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 107
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 108
C/I = (D/R)
/2
Sectorisation
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 109
4/12 Cell Pattern
Frequency
Groups
A1 B1 C1 D1 A2 B2 C2 D2 A3 B3 C3 D3
Channels 1 2 3 4
13 14 15 16
5 6 7 8
17 18 19 20
9 10 11 12
21 22 23 24
A3 A2
D3
D1 D2 C1
C3
C2
B1
B3 B2
17
21
13
9
10
5
22
16
12
24
8
20
3
15
7 11
19
23
2
14
6
18
A1
1
4
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 110
Adjacent Channel interference
for co-channel interference C/Ic=9 dB
for adjacent (200 kHz) interference C/Ia1=-9 dB
for adjacent (400 kHz) interference C/Ia2=-41 dB
for adjacent (600 kHz) interference C/Ia3=-49 dB
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 111
Adjacent channel interference
Relative
power
(dB)
0
-10
-20
-30
-50
-40
-60
-70
-80
0 200 400 600
Frequency from the carrier (kHz)
measurement bandwidth 30 kHz measurement bandwidth 100k Hz
1200 1800 6000 3000
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
-60
-70
-80
Relative
power
(dB)
0 200 400 600 1200 1800 6000
Frequency from the carrier (kHz)
measurement bandwidth 30 kHz
measurement bandwidth 100 kHz
Edge of TX
band + 2 MHz
3000
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 112
Co-channel interference
# Info
bits
# Coding
bits
Code
Rate
Max data rate
(kbs) /TS
Required C/I (dB)
(BLER <10%; TU3 FH)
Modul
ation
GSM 260 196 0.5 13.3 9 GMSK
CS-1 181 275 0.45 9.05 9 GMSK
CS-2 268 188 0.65 13.4 13 GMSK
CS-3 312 144 0.75 15.6 15 GMSK
CS-4 428 28 21.4 23 GMSK
MCS-1 176 0.53 8.4 9 GMSK
MCS-2 224 0.69 11.2 13 GMSK
MCS-3 296 0.89 14.8 15 GMSK
MCS-4 352 1 16.8 23 GMSK
MCS-5 448 0.38 22.4 14.5 8PSK
MCS-6 592 0.5 29.6 17 8PSK
MCS-7 896 0.78 44.8 23.5 8PSK
MCS-8 1088 0.92 54.4 29 8PSK
MCS-9 1184 1 59.2 32 8PSK
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 113
Effect of and C/I
gamma 9 12 13 17 36
2 18 33 42 102 7965
2.5 12 18 21 42 1323
3 9 12 12 24 399
3.5 6 9 9 15 171
4 6 6 9 12 90
C/I (dB
Minimum
frequencies
Assuming 3 sectored sites
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 114
Spectral Efficiency
Erlang/Hz/km
2
Using the previous problem as starting point
calculate the spectrum density that could
be achieved if the sites were sectorised.
Compare with the omni-cells
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 115
Benefits of sectorisation
Higher gain antennas are available better
penetration
Less cost for same traffic density
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 116
Underlay / Overlay - MRP
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 117
Cell Splitting
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 118
Hierarchical Cells
Umbrella Cell:
Macro Cell: Antenna above average rooftop height
Micro Cell: Antenna below average rooftop height
Pico Cell: Indoors
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 119
C/I reduction from DTX
C/I values
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
Signal Level
P
r
o
b
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
C/I
C/I DTX
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 120
Interference reduction from
Power Control
The level of the transmitted signal is reduced
to what is required for the specified Receive
Signal and Quality levels.
o Assume Urban Environment where 90% of the traffic is in
the regulation area
o The average in building expected received signal is -
60dBm
o Assume a desired signal level of -92dBm
o For affective power control the average interference
level, and the average signal level will be down by 32dB.
The effect on the C/I is difficult to determine.
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 121
Interference Reduction from PC
Interference Levels
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
-140 -120 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0
Signal Level
P
r
o
b
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
Interference
Int. DTX
Int. PC +DTX
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 122
Carrier Reduction from PC
Carrier Levels
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
-140 -120 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0
Signal Level
P
r
o
b
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
Carrier
Car. DTX
Car. PC + DTX
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 123
Impact of PC on the C/I ?
C/I values
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
Signal Level
P
r
o
b
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
C/I
C/I DTX
C/I PC + DTX
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 124
Frequency Hopping
with DTX and PC
Power control: 0
DTX: 0
TS active: 1
No call: 0
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 125
Hopping with DTX and PC
C/I values
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
Signal Level
P
r
o
b
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
C/I
C/I DTX
C/I PC + DTX
Hopping
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 126
Effect of DTX and PC on Quality
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
7.00%
8.00%
9.00%
10.00%
0 10 20 30 40
Time (hours)
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
%HOIU
%HOID
DTX + PC Off
PC Off
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 127
Planning for FH network
Use separate frequency blocks for TCH and
BCCH
o BCCH frequency channel must be Always On
o No hopping over BCCH.
Plan TCH layer:
o MAL : Mobile radio frequency channel
Allocation List
o HSN: Hopping sequence number
o MAIO: Mobile Allocation Index Offset
o MAI: Mobile Allocation Index
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 128
Selecting a BCCH block
Why a BCCH block?
o Identifying the source of interference
o Re-evaluation of the neighbour list
o For collecting data for a measurement based
plan
Optimum size?
o Where a change in a BCCH carrier will on
average make the same difference as a change
in a TCH carrier in the optimised plan
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 129
Selecting a BCCH block
BlockSize
Total Number of Carriers Available
AverageTraffic TCHlayer Scaling
BCCH
perCell DTX PC on
=
+
_ _ _ _
( / ) ( , ) 8 1
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 130
Frequency Hopping
MAI 0 2 1A 2A 3A 1B 2B 3B 1C 2C 3C
1 1 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
2 2 4 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
3 3 1 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
4 4 2 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
4 1 2 3 2 4 3 1
28 1 10 19 10 28 19 1
10 19 28 1 28 10 1 19
HSN =x
TRX1 on 1A has MAIO = 0
TRX2 on 1A has MAIO = 2
MA MAIO
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 131
Automatic Frequency
Planning Tools
Coverage
Analysis
Interference
Matrix
Propagation
Predictions
Separation
Constraints,
etc
Frequency
Plan
TRX
Requirements
etc
AFP Tool
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 132
Automatic Frequency Planning
Model of Network
Model effect of particular
assignment on quality
Propagation Predictions
Drive Test Data
Handover Statistics
Live Measurements
Cost Function:
Sum of remaining
interference and
other penalties.
Quality
Change:
Frequency
BSIC
HSN, MAIO
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 133
Interference Matrix
The conventional interference matrix
represent:
o The Traffic that will be interfered on if two
radios were assigned the same frequency;
o The area that will be interfered on if two radios
were assigned the same frequency
o pixel by pixel.
o Need ACCURATE propagation predictions and
traffic distribution maps.
o What is the cost of accurate enough
predictions?
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 134
Generating the
Interference Matrix
2.5 km
2.0 km
2 m Resolution
2.5 km
2.0 km
50 m Resolution
Microcell Service Area 1 pixel
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 135
Probability of C/I>9dB
Cummulative Probability Distribution
for C/I exceeding 9dB
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Calculated C/I (dB)
P
r
o
b
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
h
a
t
C
/
I
w
i
l
l
b
e
b
e
l
o
w
9
d
B
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 136
AFP
Implements a mathematical optimisation
method or Artificial Intelligence method to
minimise
Cost = C
ij
ij
+ A
ij
ij
o
ij
= 1 if radios i and j are assigned the same(adjacent)
frequency,
o
ij
= 0 else
By changing the frequency assignments to
the different cells
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 137
What are the true aims in
Cell and Frequency Planning
What will really give optimum quality?
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 138
The inputs to Cell Planning
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
:
(
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
m
a
p
s
)
S
p
e
c
t
r
u
m
A
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
Cost / Money
GoS
QoS
Quality
Coverage
Speech Quality
System Choice - C/I
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 139
Quality
Voice Quality
o Impacted by the FER (Frame Erasure Rate /
Probability
o And to some extent by the BER (Bit Error Rate /
probability)
Dropped Calls
o Radio Link Timeout based on unsuccessful
SACCH frame - FER
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 140
C/I to FER
Frame Erasure Rate
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
-5 0 5 10 15 20
C/I(dB)
1
0
l
o
g
(
F
E
R
)
Frequency Hopping
on 8 freqquencies,
Random Hopping
Non-Hopping
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 141
Measurement Based
Frequency Planning
Using Mobile Measurement Reports how
will you go about generating the optimal
Interference Matrix?
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 142
The first Measurement
Based Plan
Johannesburgs Central Business District
12km12km
65 sites (350 cells)
477 carriers
Despite questioned cluttered data and propagation
prediction models
very low dropped call rate of about 1.4% was very
often achieved
partly due to dedicated optimisation
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 143
Cell Traffic Recordings was used to collect Mobile
Measurement Reports on all the cells
With the mobiles measuring on all BCCH channels
The process took about a month.
The signal strength of the serving cell and the
reported neighbours was used to calculated the
C/I and eventually the FER.
The average FER for each server-interferer
relation was calculated.
and multiplied with the traffic on the serving cell
Measurement Based
Frequency Planning
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 144
The
Sanity
Check
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 145
Using
MMRs in
Frequency
Planning
Dropped Call Rate
0.90%
1.10%
1.30%
1.50%
1.70%
1.90%
2.10%
2.30%
0 10 20 30 40
Time
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
Traffic
1.29%
%Drop
DayAvg
P
l
a
n
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
d
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 146
Measurement Based Frequency Plan
Dropped Call Rate
0.90%
1.10%
1.30%
1.50%
1.70%
1.90%
2.10%
2.30%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
(
0
.
1
%
p
e
r
d
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
)
Traffic
Previous Minimum
%Drop
DayAvg
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
B
a
s
e
d
P
l
a
n
r
u
n
i
n
P
r
e
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
D
r
i
v
e
T
e
s
t
s
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 147
The
Results:
Quality
Intra-cell Hand-over and TCH Dropped
due to Bad Quality
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
7.00%
8.00%
0 10 20 30 40
Time
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
(
o
f
t
c
a
l
l
s
f
o
r
H
a
n
d
t
c
a
s
s
a
l
f
o
r
T
)
%HoBUQ
%HoBDQ
Traffic
%TBQDis*50
P
l
a
n
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
d
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 148
Data Sources for the
Interference Matrix (1)
Propagation Predictions
o Well established conventional method
o Based on Predicted Carrier to Interference
ratios that is often translated with a C/I weights
curve
o Integration with AFP tools eases use
o Suited for new networks with many new cells
o Dependant on elevation and clutter data that
often has limited accuracy
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 149
Neighbour relations statistics
o Well suited for very tight plan
o Too little information for a less tight plan
o Hand-over statistics not directly related to C/I
o Can not model interference from non-
neighbours
Data Sources for the
Interference Matrix (2)
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 150
Drive Test Data
o Measurements done with network set on measure on all
BCCH channels
o Independent of accuracy of elevation and clutter data
o Extensive measurements necessary for interference
matrix
o Difficult to deduce interfered traffic from data
o Drives are limited to roads and does not include high
rise buildings
o Effort in importing into an AFP
o Often used to supplement propagation predictions
Data Sources for the
Interference Matrix (3)
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 151
Live Data: Mobile Measurement Reports
o Mobile Measurement Reports are collected with the cell
set to measure on all BCCHs
o Data reflect the actual traffic distribution as well as the
actual C/I. (as the customer sees it)
o No additional neighbour relations or exceptions required
o Extensive data collection - slow process. Requires the
network to be fairly mature and stable.
o Difficult to model new sites
o Takes some effort to import into an AFP.
Data Sources for the
Interference Matrix (4)
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 152
Prediction vs. MMRP
LIMITED accuracy
o Propagation predictions
o Clutter and Height data
o In building
o Traffic distribution
Cannot represent new
sites
MMR limitations:
o RxLev: -110 -> -48dBm
o Only integers
o Only six neighbours
o BSIC decoding
problems
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 153
Combining Data Sources
.one of the remaining challenges. E.g:
o How to complement the shortcomings of the
mobile measurements reports with the
propagation predictions to include new cells.
o How to combine limited measurements with
predictions.
without
o Spoiling good data with bad data.
o Skewing the matrix, e.g. when drive test data is
available for only part of the network.
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 154
Penalties for AFP
A bare necessity approach i.e. set
penalties only when
o it is required by law or
o It is required for feasibility e.g. filter combiner
separation
o it will assist in the improvement of network
quality
o Is penalties to avoid adjacencies required?
The size of the penalties must reflect their
importance and effect on network quality
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 155
Examples of Scaling Factors
Difference in interference introduced
o Traffic load on TCH channels
o Power Control
o Discontinuous Transmission (DTX)
o Over-laid Under-laid - depend on effectiveness
of implementation
o Synthesizer Hopping - dependant on fractional
load
Difference in immunity to interference
o Frequency Diversity Gain of Hopping Networks
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 156
Interference Load
The core questions:
o How much interference will assigning the same
frequency to a carrier in Cell A and Cell B
cause ?
o How much less will that be after DTX?
o How much less will that be after Power Control?
Interference Load
o How much signal or potential interference is
carried on a particular carrier
o Interference Load = Traffic on Cell
8 * #Carriers
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 157
Interference Load Reduction
For BCCH
o Interference Load = 1
For Non-Hopping TCH without DTX and PC
o Interference Load = Traffic on TCH Carriers
o 8 * Number of TCH Carriers
After DTX
o Voice Activity Factor 40% on TCH channels
o Interference Load = 0.4 * Traffic on TCH Carriers
o 8 * Number of TCH Carriers
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 158
Interference Load Reduction
After Power Control ?
o Consider a very simplified model:
C/I = Server SS / (6* Interferers SS)
Reducing the signal level of the server and of the
interferers by approximately 10dB:
C/I = 0.1* Server SS / (6*0.1* Interferers SS)
Approximately unchanged.
o Practical implementation suggest a definite
interference reduction - by 60%
o Interference Load = 0.6 * Traffic on TCH Carriers
o 8 * Number of TCH Carriers
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 159
A few terms
Frequency Allocation Re-use
o FAR = Total Number of Frequency Channels
Number of Frequencies per Cell
Effective Re-use
R
eff
= Total Number of Frequency Channels
Average number of TRX per Cell
Fractional Load
o L
frac
= Number of TRX per Cell .
Number of Frequencies per Cell
Hardware Load
o L
HW
= (Busy Hour Traffic) / (TN /TRX)
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 160
A few terms
Frequency Load
o L
freq
= L
HW
L
frac
Effective Frequency Load
o EFL =. Busy Hour Traffic per Cell .
(TN per TRX for Traffic).(Total # FreqCH)
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 161
Optimum # carriers to
Hop over = 24/6
Optimum frequency Re-use
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Frequency Reuse = #TCH carriers / #TCH per cell
E
r
l
a
n
g
p
e
r
S
i
t
e
6MHz available f or TCH
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 162
Quality vs Capacity
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
150
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Average Erlang per Cell (Capacity)
(deduced from Spectrum Utilisation)
M
i
n
u
t
e
E
r
l
a
n
g
p
e
r
D
r
o
p
(
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
)
The challenge: To maximize Quality * Capacity
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 163
Major Interferers
Effect of reducing major interferers
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00%
Per cent age of Cel l s cont r i but i ng t o I nt er f er ence
Cummulative Contribution
With 5 sites' interference removed
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 164
What criteria would you
use for site selection?
Close to traffic most effective Power Control
Contained (high )
o In building
o In valleys rather than on top of mountains
What effect will an unbalanced link have?
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 165
What criteria will you provide an
Automatic Cell Planning tool with?
Interference Matrix
MMR
Frequency Allocation
Propagation Predictions
Traffic distribution - GIS
Possible sites
Equipment used
Effective Frequency load
Hand over areas
Income: Coverage
of potential traffic
Cost: cost of
changes / sites
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 166
Changes in ACP
Site Selection
o Set of viable sites
o Propagation prediction
Prediction model (accurate)
DEM
Clutter
Buildings
o Traffic distribution
Demographic
Antenna parameters (Tilts & Azimuths)
Upgrading
o Cell Statistics
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 167
Changes in ACP
Radio Parameters
o Transmission power
o Cell Hysterises
o Cell Hierarchical Level
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 168
Evaluating automatic tools...
Automatic Frequency Planning Tools
o Must Allow various data sources to be imported
o Must model the network accurately (e.g. Model
hopping accurately)
o Must be simple to use, hence most of the
modelling should be integrated
Automatic Network Optimisation
o Must be reliable and accurate enough to allow it to
run free with very little manual input
Automatic Cell Planning
o Cost function is so complex it should come with
the tool... and allow manual changes
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 169
MS Sensitivity
GSM 900 MS
o for GSM 900 small MS -102 dBm
o for other GSM 900 MS -104 dBm
DCS 1 800 MS
o for DCS 1 800 class 1 or class 2 MS -100
/ -102 dBm *
o for DCS 1 800 class 3 MS -102 dBm
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 170
BTS sensitivity
GSM 900 BTS
o for normal BTS -104 dBm
o for micro BTS M1 -97 dBm
o for micro BTS M2 -92 dBm
o for micro BTS M3 -87 dBm
o for pico BTS P1 -88 dBm
DCS 1 800 BTS
o for normal BTS -104 dBm
o for micro BTS M1 -102 dBm
o for micro BTS M2 -97 dBm
o for micro BTS M3 -92 dBm
o for pico BTS P1 -95 dBm
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 171
Defining
Quality
Speech Quality (BER, FER)
Dropped Calls
Coverage
Call Set-up success
Handover stats
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 172
To do
Cell Planning
Frequency Planning
Link balancing
Neighbour lists
o Handover parameters
Power Control
DTX
Dimensioning
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 173
Idle mode location
The path loss criterion parameter C1 used for cell selection and reselection is
defined by:
C1 = (A - Max(B,0))
where
A = RLA_C - RXLEV_ACCESS_MIN
B = MS_TXPWR_MAX_CCH - P
P= Maximum RF output power of the MS.
All values are expressed in dBm.
The reselection criterion C2 is used for cell reselection only and is defined
by:
C2 = C1 + CELL_RESELECT_OFFSET
- TEMPORARY OFFSET * H(PENALTY_TIME - T)
for PENALTY_TIME <> 11111
C2 = C1 - CELL_RESELECT_OFFSET
for PENALTY_TIME = 11111
Where for non-serving cells: H(x) = 0 for x < 0
= 1 for x >= 0
for serving cells: H(x) = 0.
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 174
GPRS cell selection
A= RLA_P - GPRS_RXLEV_ACCESS_MIN
B= GPRS_MS_TXPWR_MAX_CCH - P
C32(s) = C1(s) (serving cell)
C32(n) = C1(n) + GPRS_RESELECT_OFFSET(n) -
TO(n) * (1-L(n)) (neighbour cell)
TO(n) = GPRS_TEMPORARY_OFFSET(n) *
(GPRS_PENALTY_TIME(n) - T(n)).
L(n) = 0 if PRIORITY_CLASS(n) = PRIORITY_CLASS(s)
1 if PRIORITY_CLASS(n) PRIORITY_CLASS(s)
H(x) = 0 for x < 0
1 for x 0
C31(s) = RLA_P(s) - HCS_THR(s) (serving cell)
C31(n) = RLA_P(n) - HCS_THR(n) - TO(n) * L(n)
(neighbour cell)
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 175
The inputs to Radio
Network Optimisation
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
:
(
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
m
a
p
s
)
S
p
e
c
t
r
u
m
A
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
Cost / Money
GoS
QoS
Quality
Coverage
Speech Quality
System Choice - C/I
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 176
Quality Capacity product
Quality vs Capacity
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
150
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Average Erlang per Cell (Capacity)
(deduced from Spectrum Utilisation)
M
i
n
u
t
e
E
r
l
a
n
g
p
e
r
D
r
o
p
(
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
)
The challenge: To maximize Quality * Capacity
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 177
Link balance
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 178
Neighbour
List for
1883B:
Propagation
Predictions
1883A 1883A
1883C 1883C
236A 236A
236D 236D
1569B 1569B
294C 294C
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 179
Neighbour Lists for 1883B :
Measurement Based Methods and Handover Statistics
Potential
Neighbour
Percentage of
Reports it was
the Strongest
Percentage of times it
was 3dB stronger
than the server
Recommended
by Complete
MMR method?
Handover
Attempts
Succesful
Handovers
Hand
overs
Returned
Drops at
Hand
over
1883A 10.36% 4.64% Yes 742 730 9 3
236B 8.73% 6.03% Yes 1186 1166 3 17
1883C 5.56% 2.01% Yes 449 444 4 1
294C 5.49% 5.56% Yes 1052 1031 9 12
236D 4.02% 1.78% Yes 479 472 1 6
236A 3.25% 3.01% Yes 251 241 3 7
1569B 2.86% 2.63% Yes 498 488 8 2
980C 2.01% 1.85% Yes 413 401 5 7
1569C 1.70% 1.16% Yes 0 0 0 0
294B 1.62% 2.32% No 117 112 4 1
2150B 1.47% 2.16% No 295 268 24 3
340B 1.00% 1.31% No
251A 0.93% 2.47% No
1933C 0.70% 2.86% No 328 1 319 8
408C 0.62% 1.70% No 21 21 0 0
251B 0.54% 1.55% No
409B 0.46% 1.47% No
2441B 0.39% 3.09% No 424 421 0 3
236C 0.31% 2.09% No 127 119 8 0
519B 0.23% 1.93% No 59 57 0 2
84A 0.15% 2.09% No
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 180
Example 2 : Neighbour Lists
Small but
essential
neighbour
Unnecessary
Neighbour
Typical
Neighbour
Typical
Neighbour
Server
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 181
Example 3: Cell Planning
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 182
Example 3: Link Balance
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 183
Performance in Technical Terms (1)
Traffic carried
o Erlang: Average number of trunks
occupied during a period
o MinuteErlang or Accumulated Traffic
Perceived Grade Of Service
PGoS
#ofCallAttemps - #ofCallSuccesses
#ofCallAttempts
100% =
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 184
Performance in Technical Terms (2)
Dropped Call Rate
Average traffic carried before a call
drops
Dropped%
# ofDroppedCalls
# ActiveofCalls
= 100%
Minut eErlangPerDrop
Minut eErlangCarried
of DroppedCalls
=
#
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 185
Contributors to Lack of
Performance
Failures at any point of the network
contribute performance degradation
A chain is as strong as its weakest link:
The Radio Link
Hence the emphasize on the
performance at cell level.
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 186
Cell Statistics (1)
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 187
Cell Statistics (2)
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 188
Cell Statistics (3)
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 189
Cell Statistics (4)
Traffic in Erlang:
Minute Erlang
Average Erlang
Traf f ic Level Accumulat or
Number of Accumulat ions
.
. .
. .
= == =
Minut eErlang Average Erlang Measurement Period = . .
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 190
Cell Statistics (5)
Dropped Call Rate
o
o
% 100
HOINSUC TMSESTB
TNDROP
% Dropped
=
Dropped
DroppedCalls
CallsAct iveOnCell
% = == = 100%
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 191
Cell Statistics (6)
Perceived Grade Of Service
PGoS
CallAttemptsToCell CallSuccessesToCell
CallAttemptsToCell
=
# #
#
( )
100%
HOINxQA TCALL
HOINSUC TMSESTB HOINxQA TCALL
PGOS
B D, U, x
B D, U, x
\
|
(
\
|
=
=
=
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 192
Cell Statistics (7)
Call Success Rate
o A parameter that combines the effect of
congestion, setup failures and dropped calls
o
CallSuccessRat e
t msest b hoinsuc t ndrop
t call hoinxqa
x UD B
=
, ,
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 193
Cell Statistics (8)
Congestion and Failures on Control
Channels also influence PGOS.
o Hard to distinguish between call setup and
location updating
o Hence to need to determine performance
of Control channels:
Dropped Control Channel Rate
Control Channel PGOS
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 194
BSC statistics (1)
In essence the BSC statistics is a
summation of the Cell statistics.
e.g.
PGoS
tassell tcassel
tassell
AllCells AllCells
AllCells
=
GoS
NICONG
NCALLS NICONG
ORG IEX
ORG IEX ORG IEX
=
+
,
, ,
100%
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 196
MSC Statistics (2)
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 197
Overall Network Performance
SuccRat e
t cassel t ndrop
t assell
NICONG NUNSUCC
t assell
AllCells AllCells
AllCells
AllMSC ORGIEX AllMSC ORGIEX
AllCells
=
( , ) ( , )
100%
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 198
Problem Diagnostics (1)
A problem is a problem if it affects
performance:
o Dropped calls
o Congestion on traffic or control channel
o Setup failures of calls.
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 199
Problem Diagnostics (2)
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 200
Problem Diagnostics (3)
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 201
Problem Diagnostics (4)
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 202
Problem Diagnostics (5)
Interference - Cell 234B
o High number of dropped calls
o High intra-cell handovers due to bad quality
o High U2-U5 uplink interference counters
Missing Neighbour Relation or Measurement
frequency - Cell 1375A
o High dropped call rate
o High Tfail%
o Possibly high congestion.
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 203
Problem
Diagnostics
(6)
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 204
Problem Diagnostics (7)
Transceiver failure - 1456A. (see next slide)
o High dropped call rate
o High Tfail%
o High ICM counters
Congestion due to limited capacity - 184A
o High Congestion rate
o Other counters are normal.
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 205
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 206
Problem diagnostics (8)
Neighbour Failing - 184A
o Sudden rise in traffic
o Sudden rise in congestion
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 207
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 208
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 209
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 210
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 211
GSM Signaling Layers
Layer 1 (physical layer)
o Physical transmission
o Channel Quality Measurements
o Uses many channel structures
o E1 2Mb/s links (64kb/s PCM)
o GSM 44.04 for Air interface;
o GSM 48.54 for Abis
o GSM 48.04 for A
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 212
Layer 2 (data link layer)
o Multiplexing of layer 2 connections on signaling
channels
o Error detection and correction
o Flow control
o Routing
o Across Um interface uses LAPDm (a slight modification
of LAPD protocol used in ISDN)
o Across Abis uses LAPD
o Across A interface, uses MTP and SCCP of SS7
o SAPI=0 Identifies radio signaling procedures
SAPI: Service Access Point Indicator
GSM Signaling Layers
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 213
Layer 3 is sub-divided into 3 sub-layers
o Connection Management
o Management of Location data
o Subscriber identification
o Management of added services ( SMS, call
forwarding)
GSM Signaling Layers
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 214
Layer 3 Signaling Protocols
MM: Mobility Management
o Location updating
o Registration
o Security and authentication procedures
o Assignment of TMSI
CM: Connection Management
o Call control (CC): Manages call connections
o Supplementary Service support (SS)
o Short Message Service support (SMS)
MM and CM pass un-interpreted by BTS or BSC
to MSC via DTAP
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 215
RR: Radio Resources Management
o Establishment, maintenance, and termination
of radio link between MS and MSC despite MS
movements.
o Allow point-to-point dialogue even during
including cell selection and handover
procedures
o Monitoring and forwarding of radio connections
o Handled by BSC, BTS and MS
Layer 3 Signaling Protocols
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 216
RR messages are mapped on BSSAP:
o Cipher mode management
o DTX management
o Handovers
o Call re-establishment
o Load Management
o SACCH procedures
Power Control, Timing Advance,
Mobile Measurement Reports
o BCCH info
Cell Selection info
CGI
Idle mode info (other BCCH frequencies)
Layer 3 Signaling Protocols
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 217
Layer 3 Signaling Protocols
BTS Management (BTSM)
o SAPI 0 is used for messages to and from the
radio interface
o SAPI 62 is used for Operation and Maintenance
messages between BTS and BSC
o SAPI 63 is used for layer 2 management
functions
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 218
Layer 2 Signaling Protocols
Message Transfer Part: MTP
o Interface to Physical Layer
o Ensures reliable transmission and delivery of
the signaling traffic
o Provides flow control sensing node failure
o Routing, Distribution, Traffic Discrimination and
Network Management
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 219
Layer 2 Signaling Protocols
Signaling Connection Control Part: SCCP
o Managed by MSC
o Involves the following protocols:
From the Mobile
MM: CM service request
RR: Paging Response
MM: Location updating request
MM: CM re-establishment request
From the MSC
BSSMAP: handover request
o Uses local addressing based on subsystem numbers
o Provides functions to handle congestion and failure
conditions
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 220
Layer 3 Signaling Protocols
Base Station System Application Part:
BSSAP
o Split into Base Station System Management
Application Part : BSSMAP and Direct Transfer
Application Part : DTAP
o Handles messages not transparent to BSC
o Supports all procedures related to single calls
and resource management
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 221
Layer 3 Signaling Protocols
Direct Transfer Application Part : DTAP
o Transfers messages between MSC and MS
o (MM & CM messages are transparent to the BSC
MAP (Mobile Application Part)
o SS7 top layer protocol
o Responsible for signaling between different entities in
network, such as between HLR and VLR and EIR
o Access and Location management
o MSC-MSC handover,
o Security functions
o SMS and supplementary services
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 222
Layer 3 Signaling Protocols
Transaction Capabilities Application Part:
TCAP
o Provides universal calls and functions for
handling requests to distributed application
processes
ISDN User Part : ISUP
o Controls interworking (e.g. call setup) between
PLMN and other networks.
Intelligent Network Application Part: INAP
o Implements intelligent supplementary services
(e.g. free call, time dependent routing functions)
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 223
CSD call
BSC/TRC MSC/VLR
DTI
PSTN
ISDN
PAD
PAD
PSPDN
1.
2.
1.
2.
3. 5.
4.
6.
6.
2. Connection between ms
and network is set up.
Authentication performed
3. MSC analyses
the BC. B. no and
BC are transferred
to the DTI
4. The DTI is
configured to perform
the required service
(fax, modem service)
5. DTI reroutes
the call to MSC
6. MSC routes the call to the
destination NW. The
connection may be through
an existing NW (PSTN/ISDN)
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 224
GPRS network
Traffic and signaling
Signaling
TE Terminal Equipment
MT Mobile Terminal
MS Mobile Station
BSS Base Station System
BTS Base Transceiver Station
BSC Base Station Controller
GMSC Gateway Mobile Services Switching
Center
MSC Mobile services Switching Center
VLR Visitor Location Register
HLR Home Location Register
AUC Authentication Center
EIR Equipment Identity Register
SGSN Serving GPRS Support Node
GGSN Gateway GPRS Support Node
Um Air Interface
A, Abis Interfaces (GSM)
Gx Interfaces (GPRS)
External
IP Network
(Corporate
LAN)
Gi
TE MT
MS
BSC
GMSC
MSC/VLR
SGSN
EIR
HLR
AUC
GGSN
IP-Backbone
Network
External
IP Network
(Internet)
External
X.25 Network
Gs
Gf
Gr
BTS
Gb
Um
ISDN/
PSTN
Gn
A
Other
PLMN
Gp
BSS
Abis
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 225
Reference
http://www.cs.hut.fi/~hhk/GPRS/
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 226
GPRS protocol stack
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 227
Air Interface
Share the Physical Layer with GSM
On demand PDCH
o PILTIMER
Dedicated PDCH
PDCH can be shared by users
o TFI Temporary ID to distinguish between
mobiles on same PDCH
o USF Indicates when the MS can transmit on
the uplink.
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 228
Coding Schemes
# Info
bits
# Coding
bits
Code
Rate
Max data rate
(kbs) /TS
Required C/I (dB)
(BLER <10%; TU3 FH)
Modul
ation
GSM 260 196 0.5 13.3 9 GMSK
CS-1 181 275 0.45 9.05 9 GMSK
CS-2 268 188 0.65 13.4 13 GMSK
CS-3 312 144 0.75 15.6 15 GMSK
CS-4 428 28 21.4 23 GMSK
MCS-1 176 0.53 8.4 9 GMSK
MCS-2 224 0.69 11.2 13 GMSK
MCS-3 296 0.89 14.8 15 GMSK
MCS-4 352 1 16.8 23 GMSK
MCS-5 448 0.38 22.4 14.5 8PSK
MCS-6 592 0.5 29.6 17 8PSK
MCS-7 896 0.78 44.8 23.5 8PSK
MCS-8 1088 0.92 54.4 29 8PSK
MCS-9 1184 1 59.2 32 8PSK
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 229
Modulation Schemes
I
Q
(0,1,1)
(1,1,0) (1,0,1)
(0,0,0)
(0,0,1) (1,1,1)
(1,0,0)
(0,1,0)
I
Q
1
0
1 bit per symbol 3 bits per symbol
GMSK 8PSK
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 230
Routing Areas
BTS
BTS
BTS
BTS
BTS
BTS
BTS
BSC BSC
MSC
BTS
BTS
BTS
BTS
BTS
BTS
BTS
BSC BSC
MSC
PSTN
Similar to Location Areas in GSM
(Very often the same as LA, RA<=LA)
RA update is send to SGSN
(if SGSN changes all GGSNs are informed
Done when MS is in Ready state
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 231
Active Mode
The Mobile does cell selection
o Based on idle mode type measurements
o Send message to the network when it changes
cells
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 232
BSC SGSN
(OLD)SGSN
HLR
AUC
MSC/VLR
1. MS sends message to SGSN Attach Request
2. If the MS is unknown to the SGSN it asks the old SGSN about IMSI and Triplets
3. If MS is not known by old SGSN it sends an error message to the new SGSN and
the new SGSN asks the MS about the IMSI
6. Update MSC/VLR if its a new
Location Area
7. SGSN tells MS about
new TLLI
GPRS ATTACH
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 233
PDP Context
PDP: Packet Data Protocol
It is the connection between the MS and the
GGSN
Typically it is a IP-connection
PDP address = IP address
APN: Access Point Name = Internet Domain
Name GGSN translate that to an IP
address
NSAPI: Network Service Access Point ID
TID = IMSI + NSAPI
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 234
QoS
Precedence / Priority
o High, Medium or Low
Reliability
Delay
Throughput
o Mean
o Peak
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 235
What does EDGE require?
31 January 2008 3GPP CE at UP 236