Rubric for oral presentations Criteria Poor 1-4 points Unclear purpose and main ideas Too little

supporting details or too much irrelevant, inaccurate or redundant material. Introduction extremely underdeveloped or missing. Limited organizational structure is confusing. Conclusion extremely underdeveloped or missing. Too many mistakes and too simple structures poor vocabulary and numerous mistakes. No eye contact because of information reading Mumbles, and uses monotone or highly erratic voice inflection. Speaks too quietly for other students in the back of class to hear. Its hard to get what he/she says as he/she pronunces Fair 5-6 points Unforcused main idea and purpose Limited, overly general, or slightly off-topic supporting details. Introduction either underdeveloped or awkard. Organizational structure is occasionally unclear. Conclusion underdeveloped, or fails to match content and purpose of speech. still some grammatical mistakes. Mostly uses routine words. Occasionally uses eye contact but reads most of information Low volume little vaiation in tone. Good 7-8 points Clear purpose and main ideas Relevant but inconsistently strong supporting details are Excellent 9-10 points Clear and focused purpose and main ideas Strong, supporting details

1. Ideas and Content

2. Organization

Effective introduction Highly effective brings audience to topic. introduction brings audience to topic. Clear organizational structure is relatively easy to Clear organizational follow. structure enhances audience understanding of message. Planned conclusion may lack subtly but still A well-designed matches content and conclusion matches content purpose of speech. and purpose of speech. Correct grammar and various structures a wide range of vocabulary but still very few minor mistakes. Maintains eye contact most of time but frequently returns to notes Clear volume Effective variation in tone Most students can hear presentation. no grammatical mistake, and various and stunning structures. A wide range of vocabulary. Maintains eye contact, seldom looks at notes Clear voice Effective variation in tone - All students can hear presentation. Student is really excellent at pronunciation, nearly like

3. Grammar and Vocabulary 4. Delivery (body language: eye contact, hand gesture, moving; Voice quality: volume, intonation, stress, pause,) 5. Pronunciation

Student pronounces many terms Students pronunciation is incorrecly. good. Only a few mistakes 1

most terms incorrectly. 6. Notes, Visual aids Weak, inaccurate, many grammatical errors Students responses to examiner questions may be undeveloped or unclear. He/ she demonstrates little comprehension. Poorly planned, somewhat accurate, some grammatical errors Students responses to examiner questions are partially relevant. He/ she demonstrates a low level of comprehension.

are found. Adequate, mostly accurate, few grammatical errors Students responses to examiner questions are generally relevant but little elaboration may be offered. Most of the time, clarifies, restates, and responds to questions, and summarizes when needed. Misses some opportunities for interaction. speaking fluently most of the time.

native speakers. No mistakes are found. Attractive, accurate, grammatically correct Students responses to examiner questions are focused and relevant. Consistently clarifies, restates, and responds to questions. Summarizes when needed.

7. Responses to questions

8 . Fluency

Frequent use of awkward pauses, mannerisms such as "Uhmm", etc.

Sometimes halting delivery with frequent space fillers such as um. you know, etc.

familiarity with terms enabling comfortable rate of flow