Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Multi-Carrier Operation Multi-Carrier Operation 1x Data Performance 1x Data Performance Practical Optimization Practical Optimization Additional Resources Additional Resources
December, 2003
5-1
Multi-Carrier/Multi-System/Multi-Manufacturer
World!
Systems are forced to use multiple carriers to achieve needed traffic capacity Its important that the traffic load be divided between carriers Physically adjacent friendly systems often desire to allow seamless mobile operation across their borders, although they use different carrier frequencies Even within one large network, seamless mobile operation is desired across serving switch boundaries These situations are not completely solved in the original IS-95 CDMA vision, so additional standards documents and additional proprietary processes provide the needed functionality IS-95: hashing or GSRMs can distribute idle mobiles among carriers IS-41 - provides intersystem handoffs and call delivery Proprietary algorithms can distribute in-call traffic among carriers RF tricks and network proprietary algorithms can support inter-carrier handoff Multi-Carrier Operation is a complex sport - a quadrathlon or pentathlon!
Its A
December, 2003
5-2
f5 f4
Hashing Proprietary Network Algorithms Nortel: MCTA Lucent: Motorola: MFCLMF
f3 f2 f1
MRU SDA
PRL-AI
f1
Basic Multi-Carrier Operation
W0 Pilot w1 Paging wa Traffic wb Traffic w32 Sync wx Traffic wy Traffic wz Traffic W0 Pilot w1 Paging wa Traffic wb Traffic w32 Sync wx Traffic wy Traffic wz Traffic W0 Pilot w1 Paging wa Traffic wb Traffic w32 Sync wx Traffic wy Traffic wz Traffic W0 Pilot w1 Paging wa Traffic wb Traffic w32 Sync wx Traffic wy Traffic wz Traffic W0 Pilot w1 Paging wa Traffic wb Traffic w32 Sync wx Traffic wy Traffic wz Traffic W0 wa wb wc wd wx wy wz
f2
f3
f4
December, 2003
IS-95
IS-95
IS-95
IS-95
f1
Pilot Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic W0 wa wb wc wd wx wy wz
f2
IS-95
f3
Pilot Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic
W0 wa wb wc wd wx wy wz
f4
Pilot Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic
IS-95
IS-95
IS-95
f1
5-4
W0 wa wb wc wd wx wy wz
f2
Pilot Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic
W0 wa wb wc wd wx wy wz
f3
Pilot Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic
f4
1xRTT
IS-95
IS-95
IS-95
Important Questions: How do idle dual-mode mobiles choose a system? When do they select analog operation? How do idle CDMA mobiles change carrier frequencies? How do CDMA mobiles in a call handoff to other carrier frequencies? Can CDMA mobiles in a call hand down to analog operation? When can a dual mode mobile return from analog to CDMA?
December, 2003 Course 120 (c) 2003 Scott Baxter 5-5
F2
Brand Y System
At present, only Hard Handoffs work between different manufacturers Important Questions: What happens if bordering cells are on the same frequency? Advantages and drawbacks What happens if bordering cells are on different frequencies? Advantages and drawbacks
December, 2003 Course 120 (c) 2003 Scott Baxter 5-6
F1
Brand X System
ATM links between CDMA packet networks (soft handoffs are desired)
At present, most manufacturers support intersystem soft handoff Important Questions: What happens if bordering cells are on the same frequency? Advantages and drawbacks What happens if bordering cells are on different frequencies? Advantages and drawbacks
December, 2003 Course 120 (c) 2003 Scott Baxter 5-7
December, 2003
5-8
System acquisition is primarily controlled by the mobile dual-mode mobiles look for last-used frequency first Distant mobiles may notice weak Carrier 2 signals beyond the edge of Carrier 2 coverage, and originate calls likely to drop system can transmit Global Service Redirection Messages on all out-looking Carrier 2 sectors to immediately force any distant mobiles to reacquire Carrier 1 there will be no F2 originations on outermost F2 sectors! However, still possible to soft-handoff into F2 outer sectors
December, 2003
5-9
December, 2003
5 - 10
f5 f4 f3 f2 f1
Auxiliary Handoff Triggers Beacons Ec/Io, RTD Proprietary Processes
Mobiles in a call are receiving only their current operating frequency Theyre unaware of the presence or absence of signals on different carrier frequencies, so they dont realize when they need to do intercarrier handoffs Networks use a variety of methods to trick mobiles into appropriate handoffs Pilot beacons - decoy signals on the current frequency that lure the mobile into disclosing needed information Tier-based triggers Round trip delay thresholds Ec/Io and other parameter thresholds
Mobiles in conversation cant see pilots on different carrier frequencies. We must trick these mobiles into handoff by artificial means.
December, 2003 Course 120 (c) 2003 Scott Baxter 5 - 11
Interference
SW2 BSC2
City 1
Consider two adjacent CDMA systems: Same frequency If not equipped for intersystem soft handoff, only hard handoff is possible between them; dragged handoffs become a big problem Handoff Performance Results: Mobiles CAN see pilots from adjoining system, so mobile-directed handoff is possible However, due to hard handoff mobiles can use only one system or the other, not both, and simultaneous shared power control is not possible dragging mobiles cause severe interference in border cells border area has poor capacity, high access failures and dropped calls
December, 2003 Course 120 (c) 2003 Scott Baxter 5 - 12
no problems!
SW2 BSC2
Consider two adjacent CDMA systems: Same frequency ATM connection between BSCs allows soft handoff Handoff Performance Results: Mobiles CAN see pilots from adjoining system, so mobile-directed handoff is possible Intersystem soft handoff is possible, so simultaneous power control is possible for mobiles in border area Border RF environment is the same as internal RF environment, no special problems
December, 2003 Course 120 (c) 2003 Scott Baxter 5 - 13
City 2
City 1
Consider two adjacent CDMA systems: Suppose intersystem soft handoff is not available Systems are deliberately on different frequencies. This definitely avoids interference in the border area, but causes other complications Conversation-State Handoff Logistical Problems: Mobiles on one system cant see the pilots of adjoining cells on the other system! So, the mobiles will never request trans-border handoff Some method must be employed to force unsuspecting mobiles into transborder handoffs Common solutions: 1) implement intersystem soft handoff, 2) Pilot beacon cells, 3) auxiliary trigger mechanisms (Ec/Io, RTD, etc.)
December, 2003 Course 120 (c) 2003 Scott Baxter 5 - 14
City 2
City 1
The Beacon Solution A pilot beacon cell is a mannequin -- a signal which can be seen by arriving mobiles from the other system on their own frequency, inducing them to request handoff as soon as it is appropriate When mobiles request soft handoff with the beacon, the old system steps in and instructs the mobiles to do intersystem hard handoff to the real cell which the mobiles are approaching on the other system Special Logistical Concerns with Beacons Of course, its possible for mobiles of one system to wake up looking at the pilot of a beacon cell in the border area, rather than a real cell. Therefore, a beacon cell must transmit not only its pilot, but also a sync channel and a paging channel with global service redirection
December, 2003 Course 120 (c) 2003 Scott Baxter 5 - 15
City 2
All along the intersystem border, a one-cell-thick transition zone is created. The bridge cells in this zone are equipped with dual equipment, one set operating on each system. The outlooking sector of each bridge cell is tagged in the site database as a boundary sector. Whenever a mobile is served exclusively by a boundary sector, the system continuously monitors that mobiles round trip delay (RTD). When the mobiles RTD passes upward through a datafilled threshold, the system steps in and orders a hard handoff to the matching sector of the bridge cell on the other system this ensures the handoffs happen in clean environments with high probability of success disadvantage: more BTS hardware needed than otherwise
December, 2003 Course 120 (c) 2003 Scott Baxter 5 - 16
City 2
Outlooking sectors of border cells are tagged as boundary sectors in the system database Whenever a mobile is served exclusively by a boundary sector, the system frequently interrogates the mobile with pilot measurement request messages When the mobiles reports the boundary sectors Ec/Io is below a preset threshold, the system immediately commands a hard handoff to a previously defined sector on the other system. Everyone hopes (prays?) that sector is able to hear the mobile for a successful handoff. The Ec/Io trigger threshold is sometimes a fixed value (usually 11 db above the T_Drop in the serving sector, although some networks later software allows an arbitrary trigger level to be set
December, 2003 Course 120 (c) 2003 Scott Baxter 5 - 17
December, 2003
5 - 18
AAA
R-P Interface
BTS
PSTN
t1
Switch
t1
SEL
CE
t1
CDMA IOS PPP
(C)BSC/Access Manager
Traditional Telephony
Coverage Holes Pilot Pollution Missing Neighbors Fwd Pwr Ovld Rev Pwr Ovld Search Windows Wireless Island Cells Mobile Device Slow Handoff
1xRTT services may include both traditional circuit-switched voice and new fast IP data connections A User's link is in multiple jeopardy, both radio and packet worlds Radio environment portion Problems: FER, drops, access failures, capacity woes Causes: mainly in the RF world, because of mainly RF problems Packet environment Problems: Setup failures, dropped connections, low throughput Causes: could be IP-related, or could be RF related
December, 2003 Course 120 (c) 2003 Scott Baxter 5 - 19
IP Data Environment
CDMA RF Environment
Optimization Issues
Network Design and Configuration Coverage holes, excessive coverage overlap Call Processing Problems due to Misconfiguration Neighbor Lists Search Windows Power control parameters Physical Problems/Hardware Problems Mismatched multicarrier sector coverage Capacity Issues Forward and Reverse Power Control Overload Physical resource congestion Channel elements, packet pipes IP network congestion Managing A New Dimension: circuit-switched and IP traffic blend QoS-related competitive issues
December, 2003
5 - 20
December, 2003
5 - 21
Both voice and data traffic loads a sector, driving up transmit power Voice calls are typically given higher priority than data MAC-layer throttling holds lower-priority data sessions off until there is enough free power available
December, 2003 Course 120 (c) 2003 Scott Baxter 5 - 22
CDMA2000 1xRTT
One Carrier, One Sector
I 9.6K 1.2K 40 x 6K 240K
PILOT PAGING SYNC CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
QPSK Q Modulator
Q Modulator
QPSK
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
~250Kb/s
Active/bursting
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
~500Kb/s
Dormant
FCH Active 9.6K
Active Dormant
FCH 9.6K
Dormant
Dormant
Dormant
1xRTT throughput is approximately twice IS-95 throughput Extra capacity of 1xRTT sectors can be used for fast data or more voice users
December, 2003 Course 120 (c) 2003 Scott Baxter 5 - 23
AAA
R-P Interface
BTS
PSTN
t1
Switch
t1
SEL
CE
t1
CDMA IOS PPP
(C)BSC/Access Manager
Traditional Telephony
Coverage Holes Pilot Pollution Missing Neighbors Fwd Pwr Ovld Rev Pwr Ovld Search Windows Wireless Island Cells Mobile Device Slow Handoff
Latency can occur because of RF channel congestion or from IP network causes RF overload can delay availability of supplemental channels IP network congestion can delay availability of packets Ping and loopback tests with local PDSN and servers can identify whether problem is in backbone network Does latency correlate with independent evidence of RF congestion?
December, 2003 Course 120 (c) 2003 Scott Baxter 5 - 24
IP Data Environment
CDMA RF Environment
AAA
R-P Interface
BTS
PSTN
t1
Switch
t1
SEL
CE
t1
CDMA IOS PPP
(C)BSC/Access Manager
Traditional Telephony
Coverage Holes Pilot Pollution Missing Neighbors Fwd Pwr Ovld Rev Pwr Ovld Search Windows Wireless Island Cells Mobile Device Slow Handoff
Throughput can be limited by RF and IP causes Traditional RF problems limit capacity of the channel Congestion in the IP network can limit speed of data available Does low throughput correlate with independent RF indicators? Does low throughput correlate with independent IP pings and tests?
December, 2003
5 - 25
IP Data Environment
CDMA RF Environment
December, 2003
5 - 26
December, 2003
5 - 28
Data Flow Management: Data Flow Management: MAC/LAC Layer Operation MAC/LAC Layer Operation
December, 2003
5 - 29
Initialization
Suspended
T_suspend
Control Hold
Packet Service Packet Service Request Deactivated PPP Terminated Release Sent! Service Option Connected Control Channel Exists
T_hold
Null Reconnect
Dormant
The answers to all these questions are determined by MAC & LAC layer processes and parameters Each network manufacturer implements some subset of the MAC/LAC states and parameters specified in the IS-2000 standard Each manufacturer has its own unique parameter set to control state transitions Most networks begin operation using manufacturer-recommended defaults as networks and applications mature, parameters will be fully optimized A basic knowledge of the manufacturers proprietary parameters gives very useful insights into configuration and performance issues
December, 2003
5 - 30
MAC States
IP Session Internet VPNs Selector/ Channel PPP Svc Cfg (RLP) Element
Backbone Network SECURE TUNNELS
Authentication Authorization Accounting
State
F-TRAFFIC F-FCH
AAA
R-P Interface
SEL
ACTIVE
exit timer: a few seconds
R-TRAFFIC R-FCH
F-SCH
CE
SCH driven by traffic
R-SCH
SCH driven by traffic
t1
Internet VPNs
F-TRAFFIC F-DCCH
AAA
R-P Interface
SEL
CONTROL HOLD
(Optional State)
t1
CE
Internet VPNs
PAGING
AAA
R-P Interface
SEL
SUSPENDED
(Optional State)
exit timer: a few seconds between data bursts
t1
CE
Internet VPNs
PAGING
AAA
R-P Interface
SEL
DORMANT
exit timer: minutes, hours between data bursts
t1
December, 2003
5 - 31
PDSN/Foreign Agent
R-P Interface
FCH +
SCH?
BTS
PCF SEL
t1
(C)BSC/Access Manager
CE
BTSC Wireless Mobile Device
The main bottleneck is the forward link itself: restricted by available transmitter power and walsh codes Each connected data User has a buffer in the PDSN/PCF complex When waiting data in the buffer exceeds a threshold, the PDSN/PCF asks the BTS for an F-SCH. Its data rate is limited by: Available BTS forward TX power; available walsh codes; competition from other users who also need F-SCHs; and mobile capability When the buffer is nearly empty, the SCH ends; FCH alone Occupancy timers and other dynamic or hard-coded triggers may apply QOS (Quality of Service) rules also may be implemented, giving preference to some users and some types of traffic
December, 2003 Course 120 (c) 2003 Scott Baxter 5 - 32
153.6
Data volume in buffer low, SCH released. Data flow continues on FCH until complete. No data, FCH idle, 1200 bps Mobile ends session.
TA
STATE
Session begins. No data, FCH idle, 1200 bps Data in PDSN buffer. Data flow begins on FCH FCH idle 1200 bps No data, FCH idle, 1200 bps Data in PDSN buffer. Data flow begins on FCH QOS algorithm gives SCH to another user briefly. Data meanwhile flows on FCH. No data, FCH idle, 1200 bps Data in PDSN buffer. Data flow begins on FCH
Channel Legend:
December, 2003
5 - 33
December, 2003
5 - 34
So S L O W ! !
IP Data Environment Internet VPNs
T
PDSN/Foreign Agent Backbone Network SECURE TUNNELS Authentication Authorization Accounting
Wheres My Data?!!
AAA
R-P Interface
BTS
PSTN
t1
Switch
t1
v SEL
t1
CE
(C)BSC/Access Manager
Traditional Telephony
Coverage Holes Pilot Pollution Missing Neighbors Fwd Pwr Ovld Rev Pwr Ovld Search Windows Wireless Island Cells Mobile Device Slow Handoff
Some sessions are tormented by long latency and slow throughput Where is the problem? Anywhere between user and distant host: Is the mobile users data device mis-configured and/or congested? Is the BTS congested, with no power available to produce an SCH? Poor RF environment, causing low rates and packet retransmission? Congestion in the local IP network (PCU, R-P, PDSN FA)? Congestion in the wireless operators backbone (OSSN) network? Congestion in the PDSN HA? Congestion in the outside-world internet or Private IP network? Is the distant host congested, with long response times?
December, 2003 Course 120 (c) 2003 Scott Baxter 5 - 35
IP Data Environment
CDMA RF Environment
Test Server
PDSN/Foreign Agent
Internet VPNs
AAA
R-P Interface
BTS
PSTN
t1
Switch
t1
v SEL
t1
CE
(C)BSC/Access Manager
Traditional Telephony
Coverage Holes Pilot Pollution Missing Neighbors Fwd Pwr Ovld Rev Pwr Ovld Search Windows Wireless Island Cells Mobile Device Slow Handoff
IP network performance can be measured using test servers Problems between mobile a local test server? The problem is local check RF conditions, stats: poor environment, SCH blocking? if the RF is clean, investigate BSC/PCU/R-P/PDSN-FA Local results OK, problems accessing test server at PDSN-HA? problem is narrowed to backbone network, or PDSN-HA Results OK even through test server at PDSN-HA then the problem is in the public layers beyond.
December, 2003 Course 120 (c) 2003 Scott Baxter 5 - 36
IP Data Environment
CDMA RF Environment
December, 2003
5 - 37
BTS
BTS
BTS
Ec/Io
BTS A
BTS B
BTS C
-10
Reality Check:
1. But who has enough regular cells OR cows or money to fix every problem location?!! 2. Problems occur in the areas between cells dominant coverage. Adding a cow only pushes the problems out to its own boundary with other cells. Conclusion: We need to design better, and to use our existing cells more effectively. We need to provide one, two, or three dominant signals everywhere.
December, 2003
5 - 38
360
A
BTS
360+33c
B
BTS
No Available Power!
Traffic Channels In Use
CEs
Vocoders Selectors
x
BTS B PN 99
1 mile
11 miles
Weak Signal / Coverage Hole Pilot Pollution Excessive Soft Handoff Handoff Failures, Rogue mobiles Missing Neighbors Search Windows Too Small BTS Resource Overload / No Resources No Forward Power, Channel Elements No available Walsh Codes No space in Packet Pipes Pilot Surprise ambush; Slow Handoffs PN Plan errors Slow Data Problems: RF or IP congestion Improper cell or reradiator configuration Hardware and software failures But on analysis, all of these problems bad effects happen because the simple few-signal ideal CDMA environment isnt possible.
5 - 39
December, 2003
December, 2003
5 - 44
Call is Established!
5 - 45
Troubleshooting Comments
If the mobile does not hear acknowledgment from the BTS within ACC_TMO, this could mean either: The BTS did not hear the mobile Maybe the mobile collided with another mobile transmitting at the same time Maybe mobile was too weak to overcome the existing reverse noise level at the BTS In either case another probe should solve the problem, provided PI is set reasonably and additional probes are allowed (check the Access Parameters Message to see if Num_Step and the power parameters make sense; be sure also the cell size or Access Channel acquisition search width is set large enough and the number of access preamble frames is large enough for the cell size) The BTS is acknowledging but the mobile cannot hear the acknowledgment If the mobile cant hear the BTS acknowledging, Ec/Io is likely quite poor. If so, check whether this is due to weak signal (poor coverage) or pilot pollution (lots of pilots all weak but no dominant server) Collect system logs if necessary to determine definitely whether the system heard the mobiles origination or not
Paging Channel
December, 2003
5 - 47
Troubleshooting Comments
If this problem happens frequently, the BTS traffic overload must be relieved. Here are some steps to try: Investigate BTS TX hardware to ensure everything is working correctly and properly calibrated, particularly gain settings in the TX chain To free up more forward power for traffic channels, try: Reduce PTXstart (initial traffic channel DGU) watching for less forward power control overloads. If you go too far, you will notice access failures increase. Reduce PTXmax (maximum traffic channel DGU) watching for less forward power control overloads. If you go too far, dropped calls will increase. Reduce sector traffic by reorienting the sectors to more closely balance the load carried by each Or, add another carrier Or split cells
Paging Channel
December, 2003
5 - 48
Troubleshooting Comments
After hearing the BTS acknowledgment, the mobile will stop probing and wait for further instructions on the paging channel. If the mobile does not hear the Channel Assignment Message within 12 seconds, the mobile will beep and display Call Failed. Possible causes: The BTS did not transmit the Channel Assignment Message Check system logs to see if this was not transmitted. If not transmitted, get troubleshooting help from the system manufacturer -- this should never occur The BTS did transmit the Channel Assignment Message, but the mobile did not hear it Was this because the paging channel faded? (Did the Ec/Io drop momentarily)? If so, see If this is a recurring problem such as a coverage hole or severe pilot pollution Finally! The mobile hears the Channel Assignment Message! Now it will immediately leave the paging channel and start trying to hear the new Forward Traffic Channel.
Paging Channel
Base Station Acknowledgment
STOP! Leave the Paging Channel, and dont transmit again on the access channel. The mobile now goes to try to hear the Forward Traffic Channel.
December, 2003
5 - 49
Troubleshooting Comments
The mobile listens to the Walsh Code # given in the Channel Assignment Message. It should hear N5M good frames full of all zeroes within T2M seconds (usually 2 frames in 10 frames). If the mobile does not hear the required number of good empty frames, it will beep and give an error message, then reacquire the system. If the mobile hears the required number of good empty frames, it starts transmitting its own Reverse Traffic Channel Preamble of empty allzero frames. If the BTS does NOT hear the mobiles access preamble within a prescribed delay, it will abort the process and release all the resources, and the mobile will reacquire the system. . This is what Lucent terms a Traffic Channel Confirmation Failure (TCCF).
If the BTS DOES hear the mobiles access preamble, it will send an acknowledgment. The mobile responds with an acknowledgment, or maybe even a pilot strength measurement message if it already needs a handoff.
December, 2003
5 - 50
Troubleshooting Comments
Now that the BTS and mobile see each other on the traffic channels, the next step is service negotiation. The BTS sends a Service Connect message listing the type and rate set of the vocoder or other primary traffic source. The mobile either accepts the proposal with a Service Connect Complete message, or counterproposes a different mode.
Service Connect Complete Message This is still just an ongoing access attempt Base Station Acknowledgment Now this is officially a call in progress
The call is now officially in progress. If anything happens to interrupt it after this point, that is considered a dropped call. If any of these steps is unsuccessful, the call attempt will probably fail. Suspect RF conditions on the link which was supposed to carry the unsuccessful command. Look at system logs and message logs from mobile drive testing to pin down just what happened.
December, 2003
5 - 51
Weak Signal/Coverage Hole? Paging Channel faded, lost no Strong Fwd interf / pollution? Is T-1unstable/blocking? Check System Logs. Was mobile heard? yes no Was Channel Assignment Message heard? yes Did mobile see N5M good frames on F-TCH? yes Check System Logs. Did BTS see mobile preamble? yes Did mobile see BS Ack? yes Check System Logs. Did BTS see mobile Ack? OK yes Check System Logs. Was CH ASN sent? no no Check System Logs. CH EL initialized OK? yes no no F-TFC Channel faded, lost Rev Link Overload? Num_Step, Pwr_Step appropriate? Sector Size, Acq Width appropriate? System Problem. Investigate why
no
Rev. Link Noise Init TCH DGU large enough? Weak Signal/Coverage Hole? Strong Fwd interf / pollution? Is T-1unstable/blocking? Weak Signal/Coverage Hole? Strong Rev Noise? Is T-1unstable/blocking?
Identify, fix source Raise DGU Improve coverage Identify, eliminate Report/repair Improve coverage Identify, eliminate Report/repair
no
December, 2003
5 - 52
December, 2003
5 - 54
Was the Sync Channel PN Active before the drop? no Did mobile request Sync CH PN in PSMM before drop? no Is PN in neighbor list? yes no yes Repair/Re-initialize Cell! Is SRCH_WIN_N adequate? yes Is cell in island Mode? no Is T-1unstable/blocking?
Widen SRCH_WIN_N!
Blocking
Is T-1unstable/blocking? More information needed. Collect system logs and merge with mobile data, analyze
December, 2003
5 - 55
December, 2003
5 - 56
December, 2003
5 - 58
December, 2003
5 - 59
December, 2003
5 - 61