International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.

1, January 2012

ADAPTIVE HYBRID CHAOS SYNCHRONIZATION OF LORENZ-STENFLO AND QI 4-D CHAOTIC SYSTEMS WITH UNKNOWN PARAMETERS
Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan1
1

Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-600 062, Tamil Nadu, INDIA
sundarvtu@gmail.com

ABSTRACT
This paper investigates the adaptive hybrid chaos synchronization of uncertain 4-D chaotic systems, viz. identical Lorenz-Stenflo (LS) systems (Stenflo, 2001), identical Qi systems (Qi, Chen and Du, 2005) and non-identical LS and Qi systems with unknown parameters. In hybrid chaos synchronization of master and slave systems, the odd states of the two systems are completely synchronized, while the even states of the two systems are anti-synchronized so that complete synchronization (CS) and anti-synchronization (AS) co-exist in the synchronization of the two systems. In this paper, we devise adaptive control schemes for the hybrid chaos synchronization using the estimates of parameters for both master and slave systems. Our adaptive synchronization schemes derived in this paper are established using Lyapunov stability theory. Since the Lyapunov exponents are not required for these calculations, the adaptive control method is very effective and convenient to achieve hybrid synchronization of identical and non-identical LS and Qi systems. Numerical simulations are shown to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed adaptive synchronization schemes for the identical and non-identical uncertain LS and Qi 4-D chaotic systems.

KEYWORDS
Adaptive Control, Chaos, Hybrid Synchronization, Lorenz-Stenflo System, Qi System.

1. INTRODUCTION
Chaotic systems are nonlinear dynamical systems that are highly sensitive to initial conditions. The sensitive nature of chaotic systems is commonly called as the butterfly effect [1]. Chaos is an interesting nonlinear phenomenon and has been extensively and intensively studied in the last two decades [1-30]. Chaos theory has been applied in many scientific disciplines such as Mathematics, Computer Science, Microbiology, Biology, Ecology, Economics, Population Dynamics and Robotics. In 1990, Pecora and Carroll [2] deployed control techniques to synchronize two identical chaotic systems and showed that it was possible for some chaotic systems to be completely synchronized. From then on, chaos synchronization has been widely explored in a variety of fields including physical systems [3], chemical systems [4-5], ecological systems [6], secure communications [7-9], etc. In most of the chaos synchronization approaches, the master-slave or drive-response formalism is used. If a particular chaotic system is called the master or drive system and another chaotic system is called the slave or response system, then the idea of the synchronization is to use the output of the master system to control the slave system so that the output of the slave system tracks the output of the master system asymptotically.
DOI:10.5121/ijfcst.2012.2102 15

International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.1, January 2012

Since the seminal work by Pecora and Carroll [2], a variety of impressive approaches have been proposed for the synchronization of chaotic systems such as the OGY method [10], active control method [11-15], adaptive control method [16-22], sampled-data feedback synchronization method [23], time-delay feedback method [24], backstepping method [25], sliding mode control method [26-30], etc. So far, many types of synchronization phenomenon have been presented such as complete synchronization [2], phase synchronization [31], generalized synchronization [32], antisynchronization [33-34], projective synchronization [35], generalized projective synchronization [36-37], etc. Complete synchronization (CS) is characterized by the equality of state variables evolving in time, while anti-synchronization (AS) is characterized by the disappearance of the sum of relevant variables evolving in time. Projective synchronization (PS) is characterized by the fact that the master and slave systems could be synchronized up to a scaling factor, whereas in generalized projective synchronization (GPS), the responses of the synchronized dynamical states synchronize up to a constant scaling matrix . It is easy to see that the complete synchronization (CS) and anti-synchronization (AS) are special cases of the generalized projective synchronization (GPS) where the scaling matrix = I and = I , respectively. In hybrid synchronization of chaotic systems [15], one part of the system is synchronized and the other part is anti-synchronized so that the complete synchronization (CS) and antisynchronization (AS) coexist in the system. The coexistence of CS and AS is highly useful in secure communication and chaotic encryption schemes. In this paper, we investigate the hybrid chaos synchronization of 4-D chaotic systems, viz. identical Lorenz-Stenflo systems ([38], 2001), identical Qi systems ([39], 2005) and nonidentical Lorenz-Stenflo and Qi systems. We deploy adaptive control method because the system parameters of the 4-D chaotic systems are assumed to be unknown. The adaptive nonlinear controllers are derived using Lyapunov stability theory for the hybrid chaos synchronization of the two 4-D chaotic systems when the system parameters are unknown. This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we provide a description of the 4-D chaotic systems addressed in this paper, viz. Lorenz-Stenflo systems (2001) and Qi systems (2005). In Section 3, we discuss the hybrid chaos synchronization of identical Lorenz-Stenflo systems. In Section 4, we discuss the hybrid chaos synchronization of identical Qi systems. In Section 5, we derive results for the hybrid synchronization of non-identical Lorenz-Stenflo and Qi systems.

2. SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
The Lorenz-Stenflo system ([38], 2001) is described by

& x1 = ( x2 x1 ) + x4 & x2 = x1 ( r x3 ) x2 & x3 = x1 x2 x3 & x4 = x1 x4

(1)

where x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 are the state variables and , , , r are positive constant parameters of the system.

16

International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.1, January 2012

The LS system (1) is chaotic when the parameter values are taken as

= 2.0, = 0.7, = 1.5 and r = 26.0.

The strange attractor of the chaotic LS system (1) is shown in Figure 1. The Qi system ([39], 2005) is described by

& x1 = a ( x2 x1 ) + x2 x3 x4 & x2 = b( x1 + x2 ) x1 x3 x4 & x3 = cx3 + x1 x2 x4 & x4 = dx4 + x1 x2 x3

(2)

where x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 are the state variables and a, b, c, d are positive constant parameters of the system. The system (2) is chaotic when the parameter values are taken as

a = 30, b = 10, c = 1 and

d = 10.

The strange attractor of the chaotic Qi system (2) is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 1. Strange Attractor of the Lorenz-Stenflo Chaotic System

17

International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.1, January 2012

Figure 2. Strange Attractor of the Qi Chaotic System

3. ADAPTIVE HYBRID CHAOS SYNCHRONIZATION OF IDENTICAL LORENZSTENFLO SYSTEMS

3.1 Theoretical Results
In this section, we discuss the adaptive hybrid chaos synchronization of identical Lorenz-Stenflo systems ([38], 2001), where the parameters of the master and slave systems are unknown. As the master system, we consider the LS dynamics described by

& x1 = ( x2 x1 ) + x4 & x2 = x1 ( r x3 ) x2 & x3 = x1 x2 x3 & x4 = x1 x4

(3)

where x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 are the states and , , , r are unknown real constant parameters of the system.

18

International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.1, January 2012

As the slave system, we consider the controlled LS dynamics described by

& y1 = ( y2 y1 ) + y4 + u1 & y2 = y1 ( r y3 ) y2 + u2 & y3 = y1 y2 y3 + u3 & y4 = y1 y4 + u4

(4)

where y1 , y2 , y3 , y4 are the states and u1 , u2 , u3 , u4 are the nonlinear controllers to be designed. The hybrid chaos synchronization error is defined by

e1 = y1 x1 e2 = y2 + x2 e3 = y3 x3 e4 = y4 + x4
The error dynamics is easily obtained as (5)

& e1 = (e2 e1 2 x2 ) + (e4 2 x4 ) + u1 & e2 = e2 + r (e1 + 2 x1 ) x1 x3 y1 y3 + u2 & e3 = e3 + y1 y2 x1 x2 + u3 & e4 = (e1 + 2 x1 ) e4 + u4

Let us now define the adaptive control functions

(6)

u1 (t ) = (e2 e1 2 x2 ) (e4 2 x4 ) k1e1 u2 (t ) = e2 r (e1 + 2 x1 ) + y1 y3 + x1 x3 k2e2 u3 (t ) = e3 y1 y2 + x1 x2 k3e3 u4 (t ) = e1 + 2 x1 + e4 k4e4

(7)

where , , and r are estimates of , , and r , respectively, and ki , (i = 1, 2,3, 4) are positive constants.
Substituting (7) into (6), the error dynamics simplifies to

& e1 = ( )(e2 e1 2 x2 ) + ( )(e4 2 x4 ) k1e1 & e2 = (r r )(e1 + 2 x1 ) k2 e2 & e3 = ( )e3 k3e3 & e4 = ( )e4 k4e4
Let us now define the parameter estimation errors as

(8)

. e = , e = , e = and er = r r

(9)
19

International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.1, January 2012

Substituting (9) into (8), we obtain the error dynamics as

& e1 = e (e2 e1 2 x2 ) + e (e4 2 x4 ) k1e1 & e2 = er (e1 + 2 x1 ) k2 e2 & e3 = e e3 k3e3 & e4 = e e4 k4e4
For the derivation of the update law for adjusting the estimates of the parameters, the Lyapunov approach is used. We consider the quadratic Lyapunov function defined by (10)

V (e1 , e2 , e3 , e4 , e , e , e , er ) =

1 2 2 2 2 2 2 e1 + e2 + e3 + e4 + e + e + e2 + er2 2

(11)

which is a positive definite function on R 8 . We also note that

& & & & & & & e = , e = , e = & and er = r

Differentiating (11) along the trajectories of (10) and using (12), we obtain

(12)

& 2 2 2 2 2 & & V = k1e12 k2e2 k3e3 k4e4 + e e1 (e2 e1 2 x2 ) e4 + e e3 & + e [ e1 (e4 2 x4 ) & ] + er e2 (e1 + 2 x1 ) r
In view of Eq. (13), the estimated parameters are updated by the following law:
2 & = e1 (e2 e1 2 x2 ) e4 + k5e 2 = e3 + k6 e

(13)

&

& = e1 (e4 2 x4 ) + k7 e & r = e2 (e1 + 2 x1 ) + k8er

where k5 , k6 , k7 and k8 are positive constants. Substituting (14) into (12), we obtain
2 2 2 2 2 & V = k1e12 k2 e2 k3e3 k4 e4 k5e k6 e k7 e2 k8er2

(14)

(15)

which is a negative definite function on R 8 .

20

International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.1, January 2012

Thus, by Lyapunov stability theory [40], it is immediate that the hybrid synchronization error ei , (i = 1, 2,3, 4) and the parameter estimation error e , e , e , er decay to zero exponentially with time. Hence, we have proved the following result. Theorem 1. The identical hyperchaotic Lorenz-Stenflo systems (3) and (4) with unknown parameters are globally and exponentially hybrid synchronized via the adaptive control law (7), where the update law for the parameter estimates is given by (14) and ki , (i = 1, 2,K ,8) are positive constants.

3.2 Numerical Results

For the numerical simulations, the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method with time-step h = 106 is used to solve the 4-D chaotic systems (3) and (4) with the adaptive control law (14) and the parameter update law (14) using MATLAB. We take ki = 4 for i = 1, 2,K ,8. For the Lorenz-Stenflo systems (3) and (4), the parameter values are taken as

= 2.0, = 0.7, = 1.5 and r = 26.0.

Suppose that the initial values of the parameter estimates are

a (0) = 6, b(0) = 5, r (0) = 2, d (0) = 7.

The initial values of the master system (3) are taken as

x1 (0) = 4, x2 (0) = 10, x3 (0) = 15, x4 (0) = 19.

The initial values of the slave system (4) are taken as

y1 (0) = 21, y2 (0) = 6, y3 (0) = 3, y4 (0) = 27.

Figure 3 depicts the hybrid-synchronization of the identical Lorenz-Stenflo systems (3) and (4). It may also be noted that the odd states of the two systems are completely synchronized, while the even states of the two systems are anti-synchronized.

Figure 4 shows that the estimated values of the parameters, viz. , , and r converge to the system parameters

= 2.0, = 0.7, = 1.5 and r = 26.0.

21

International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.1, January 2012

Figure 3. Hybrid-Synchronization of Lorenz-Stenflo Chaotic Systems

Figure 4. Parameter Estimates (t ), (t ), (t ), r (t )

22

International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.1, January 2012

4. ADAPTIVE HYBRID CHAOS SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEMS

4.1 Theoretical Results

OF

IDENTICAL QI

In this section, we discuss the adaptive hybrid chaos synchronization of identical Qi systems ([39], 2005), where the parameters of the master and slave systems are unknown. As the master system, we consider the Qi dynamics described by

& x1 = a ( x2 x1 ) + x2 x3 x4 & x2 = b( x1 + x2 ) x1 x3 x4 & x3 = cx3 + x1 x2 x4 & x4 = dx4 + x1 x2 x3

(16)

where x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 are the states and a, b, c, d are unknown real constant parameters of the system. As the slave system, we consider the controlled Qi dynamics described by

& y1 = a ( y2 y1 ) + y2 y3 y4 + u1 & y2 = b( y1 + y2 ) y1 y3 y4 + u2 & y3 = cy3 + y1 y2 y4 + u3 & y4 = dy4 + y1 y2 y3 + u4

(17)

where y1 , y2 , y3 , y4 are the states and u1 , u2 , u3 , u4 are the nonlinear controllers to be designed. The hybrid synchronization error is defined by

e1 = y1 x1 e2 = y2 + x2 e3 = y3 x3 e4 = y4 + x4
The error dynamics is easily obtained as (18)

& e1 = a (e2 e1 2 x2 ) + y2 y3 y4 x2 x3 x4 + u1 & e2 = b(e1 + e2 + 2 x1 ) y1 y3 y4 x1 x3 x4 + u2 & e3 = ce3 + y1 y2 y4 x1 x2 x4 + u3 & e4 = de4 + y1 y2 y3 + x1 x2 x3 + u4

(19)

23

International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.1, January 2012

Let us now define the adaptive control functions

u1 (t ) = a (e2 e1 2 x2 ) y2 y3 y4 + x2 x3 x4 k1e1 u (t ) = b (e + e + 2 x ) + y y y + x x x k e
2 1 2 1 1 3 4 1 3 4 2 2

u3 (t ) = ce3 y1 y2 y4 + x1 x2 x4 k3e3 u (t ) = de y y y x x x k e
4 4 1 2 3 1 2 3

(20)

4 4

where a, b, c and d are estimates of a, b, c and d , respectively, and ki , (i = 1, 2,3, 4) are positive constants.
Substituting (20) into (19), the error dynamics simplifies to

& e1 = (a a )(e2 e1 2 x2 ) k1e1 & e = (b b)(e + e + 2 x ) k e

2 1 2 1

2 2

& e3 = (c c)e3 k3e3 & e = ( d d )e k e

4 4

(21)

4 4

Let us now define the parameter estimation errors as

ea = a a, eb = b b, ec = c c and ed = d d .
Substituting (22) into (21), we obtain the error dynamics as

(22)

& e1 = ea (e2 e1 2 x2 ) k1e1 & e2 = eb (e1 + e2 + 2 x1 ) k2 e2 & e3 = ec e3 k3e3 & e4 = ed e4 k4e4

(23)

For the derivation of the update law for adjusting the estimates of the parameters, the Lyapunov approach is used. We consider the quadratic Lyapunov function defined by

V (e1 , e2 , e3 , e4 , ea , eb , ec , ed ) =

1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 e1 + e2 + e3 + e4 + ea + eb + ec + ed 2

(24)

which is a positive definite function on R 8 . We also note that

& & & & & & & & ea = a, eb = b, ec = c and ed = d

(25)

24

International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.1, January 2012

Differentiating (24) along the trajectories of (23) and using (25), we obtain
2 2 2 & & V = k1e12 k2e2 k3e3 k4e4 + ea e1 (e2 e1 2 x2 ) a

& 2 & + eb e2 (e1 + e2 + 2 x1 ) b + ec e3 c + ed

& e 2 d 4

(26)

In view of Eq. (26), the estimated parameters are updated by the following law:

& a = e1 (e2 e1 2 x2 ) + k5ea & b = e2 (e1 + e2 + 2 x1 ) + k6 eb & c = e 2 + k e

3 7 c

(27)

& 2 d = e4 + k8ed
where k5 , k6 , k7 and k8 are positive constants. Substituting (27) into (26), we obtain
2 2 2 2 2 2 & V = k1e12 k2e2 k3e3 k4e4 k5ea k6 eb k7 ec2 k8ed

(28)

which is a negative definite function on R 8 . Thus, by Lyapunov stability theory [40], it is immediate that the synchronization error ei , (i = 1, 2,3, 4) and the parameter estimation error ea , eb , ec , ed decay to zero exponentially with time. Hence, we have proved the following result. Theorem 2. The identical Qi systems (16) and (17) with unknown parameters are globally and exponentially hybrid synchronized by the adaptive control law (20), where the update law for the parameter estimates is given by (27) and ki , (i = 1, 2,K ,8) are positive constants.

4.2 Numerical Results

For the numerical simulations, the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method with time-step h = 106 is used to solve the chaotic systems (16) and (17) with the adaptive control law (14) and the parameter update law (27) using MATLAB. We take ki = 4 for i = 1, 2,K ,8. For the Qi systems (16) and (17), the parameter values are taken as

a = 30, b = 10, c = 1, d = 10.

Suppose that the initial values of the parameter estimates are

a (0) = 6, b (0) = 2, c(0) = 9, d (0) = 5

25

International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.1, January 2012

The initial values of the master system (16) are taken as

x1 (0) = 4, x2 (0) = 8, x3 (0) = 17, x4 (0) = 20.

The initial values of the slave system (17) are taken as

y1 (0) = 10, y2 (0) = 21, y3 (0) = 7, y4 (0) = 15.

Figure 5 depicts the hybrid synchronization of the identical Qi systems (16) and (17).

Figure 6 shows that the estimated values of the parameters, viz. a, b, c and d converge to the system parameters a = 30, b = 10, c = 1, d = 10.

Figure 5. Anti-Synchronization of the Qi Systems

26

International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.1, January 2012

Figure 6. Parameter Estimates a (t ), b (t ), c(t ), d (t )

5. ADAPTIVE HYBRID CHAOS SYNCHRONIZATION LORENZ-STENFLO AND QI SYSTEMS

5.1 Theoretical Results

OF

NON-IDENTICAL

In this section, we discuss the adaptive hybrid chaos synchronization of non-identical LorenzStenflo system ([38], 2001) and Qi system ([39], 2005), where the parameters of the master and slave systems are unknown. As the master system, we consider the LS dynamics described by

& x1 = ( x2 x1 ) + x4 & x2 = x1 ( r x3 ) x2 & x3 = x1 x2 x3 & x4 = x1 x4

(29)

where x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 are the states and , , , r are unknown real constant parameters of the system.
27

International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.1, January 2012

As the slave system, we consider the controlled Qi dynamics described by

& y1 = a ( y2 y1 ) + y2 y3 y4 + u1 & y2 = b( y1 + y2 ) y1 y3 y4 + u2 & y3 = cy3 + y1 y2 y4 + u3 & y4 = dy4 + y1 y2 y3 + u4

(30)

where y1 , y2 , y3 , y4 are the states, a, b, c, d are unknown real constant parameters of the system and u1 , u2 , u3 , u4 are the nonlinear controllers to be designed. The hybrid chaos synchronization error is defined by

e1 = y1 x1 e2 = y2 + x2 e3 = y3 x3 e4 = y4 + x4
The error dynamics is easily obtained as (31)

& e1 = a ( y2 y1 ) ( x2 x1 ) x4 + y2 y3 y4 + u1 & e2 = b( y1 + y2 ) x2 + rx1 x1 x3 y1 y3 y4 + u2 & e3 = cy3 + x3 + y1 y2 y4 x1 x2 + u3 & e4 = dy4 x4 x1 + y1 y2 y3 + u4

Let us now define the adaptive control functions

(32)

u1 (t ) = a ( y2 y1 ) + ( x2 x1 ) + x4 y2 y3 y4 k1e1 u (t ) = b ( y + y ) + x rx + x x + y y y k e
2 1 2 2 1 1 3 1 3 4 2 2

u3 (t ) = cy3 x3 y1 y2 y4 + x1 x2 k3e3 u (t ) = dy + x + x y y y k e
4 4 4 1 1 2 3 4 4

(33)

where a, b, c, d , , , and r are estimates of a, b, c, d , , , and r , respectively, and

ki , (i = 1, 2,3, 4) are positive constants.
Substituting (33) into (32), the error dynamics simplifies to

& e1 = (a a )( y2 y1 ) ( )( x2 x1 ) ( ) x4 k1e1 & e = (b b )( y + y ) + (r r ) x k e

2 1 2 1 2 2

& e3 = (c c) y3 + ( ) x3 k3e3 & e = (d d ) y ( ) x k e

4 4 4

(34)

4 4

28

International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.1, January 2012

Let us now define the parameter estimation errors as

ea = a a, eb = b b, ec = c c, ed = d d e = , e = , e = , er = r r
Substituting (35) into (32), we obtain the error dynamics as

(35)

& e1 = ea ( y2 y1 ) e ( x2 x1 ) e x4 k1e1 & e2 = eb ( y1 + y2 ) + er x1 k2 e2 & e3 = ec y3 + e x3 k3e3 & e4 = ed y4 e x4 k4 e4

For the derivation of the update law for adjusting the estimates of the parameters, the Lyapunov approach is used. We consider the quadratic Lyapunov function defined by (36)

V=

1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 e1 + e2 + e3 + e4 + ea + eb + ec + ed + e + e + e2 + er2 2

(37)

which is a positive definite function on R 12 . We also note that

& & & & & & & & & & & & & & & ea = a, eb = b, ec = c, ed = d , e = , e = , e = &, er = r
Differentiating (37) along the trajectories of (36) and using (38), we obtain

(38)

& 2 2 2 & & V = k1e12 k2e2 k3e3 k4 e4 + ea e1 ( y2 y1 ) a + eb e2 ( y1 + y2 ) b & & & + ec e3 y3 c + ed e4 y4 d + e e1 ( x2 x1 ) e4 x4 & & & + e e3 x3 + e e1 x4 + er e2 x1 r

(39)

In view of Eq. (39), the estimated parameters are updated by the following law:

& a = e1 ( y2 y1 ) + k5ea , & b = e2 ( y1 + y2 ) + k6 eb , & c = e3 y3 + k7 ec , & d = e4 y4 + k8ed ,

& = e1 ( x2 x1 ) e4 x4 + k9 e = e3 x3 + k10 e & = e1 x4 + k11e & r = e2 x1 + k12 er &

(40)

where k5 , k6 , k7 , k8 , k9 , k10 , k11 and k12 are positive constants.

29

International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.1, January 2012

Substituting (40) into (39), we obtain

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 & V = k1e12 k2e2 k3e3 k4e4 k5ea k6 eb k7 ec2 k8 ed k9 e k10 e k11e2 k12 er2 (41)

which is a negative definite function on R 12 . Thus, by Lyapunov stability theory [30], it is immediate that the synchronization error ei , (i = 1, 2,3, 4) and the parameter estimation error decay to zero exponentially with time. Hence, we have proved the following result. Theorem 3. The non-identical Lorenz-Stenflo system (29) and Qi system (30) with unknown parameters are globally and exponentially hybrid synchronized by the adaptive control law (33), where the update law for the parameter estimates is given by (40) and ki , (i = 1, 2,K ,12) are positive constants.

5.2 Numerical Results

For the numerical simulations, the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method with time-step h = 106 is used to solve the chaotic systems (29) and (30) with the adaptive control law (27) and the parameter update law (40) using MATLAB. We take ki = 4 for i = 1, 2,K ,12. For the Lorenz-Stenflo system (29) and Qi system (30), the parameter values are taken as

a = 30, b = 10, c = 1, d = 10, = 2.0, = 0.7, = 1.5, r = 26.

Suppose that the initial values of the parameter estimates are

(42)

a (0) = 2, b (0) = 6, c(0) = 1, d (0) = 4, (0) = 5, (0) = 8, (0) = 7, r (0) = 11

The initial values of the master system (29) are taken as

x1 (0) = 6, x2 (0) = 15, x3 (0) = 20, x4 (0) = 9.

The initial values of the slave system (30) are taken as

y1 (0) = 20, y2 (0) = 18, y3 (0) = 14, y4 (0) = 27.

Figure 7 depicts the complete synchronization of the non-identical Lorenz-Stenflo and Qi systems.

Figure 8 shows that the estimated values of the parameters, viz. a, b, c, d , , , and r converge to the original values of the parameters given in (42).

30

International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.1, January 2012

Figure 7. Complete Synchronization of Lorenz-Stenflo and Qi Systems

Figure 8. Parameter Estimates a (t ), b (t ), c(t ), d (t ), (t ), (t ), (t ), r (t )

31

International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.1, January 2012

6. CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, we have derived new results for the hybrid synchronization of identical LorenzStenflo systems (2001), identical Qi systems (2005) and non-identical Lorenz-Stenflo and Qi systems with unknown parameters via adaptive control method. The hybrid synchronization results derived in this paper are established using Lyapunov stability theory. Since the Lyapunov exponents are not required for these calculations, the adaptive control method is a very effective and convenient for achieving hybrid chaos synchronization for the uncertain 4-D chaotic systems discussed in this paper. Numerical simulations are shown to demonstrate the effectiveness of the adaptive synchronization schemes derived in this paper for the hybrid chaos synchronization of identical and non-identical uncertain Lorenz-Stenflo and Qi systems.

REFERENCES
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Alligood, K.T., Sauer, T. & Yorke, J.A. (1997) Chaos: An Introduction to Dynamical Systems, Springer, New York. Pecora, L.M. & Carroll, T.L. (1990) Synchronization in chaotic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 64, pp 821-824. Lakshmanan, M. & Murali, K. (1996) Nonlinear Oscillators: Controlling and Synchronization, World Scientific, Singapore. Han, S.K., Kerrer, C. & Kuramoto, Y. (1995) Dephasing and bursting in coupled neural oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 75, pp 3190-3193. Niu, H., Zhang, Q. & Zhang, Y. (2002) The chaos synchronization of a singular chemical model and a Williamowski-Rossler model, International Journal of Information and Systems Sciences, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp 355-364. Blasius, B., Huppert, A. & Stone, L. (1999) Complex dynamics and phase synchronization in spatially extended ecological system, Nature, Vol. 399, pp 354-359. Kocarev, L. & Parlitz, U. (1995) General approach for chaotic synchronization with applications to communication, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 74, pp 5028-5030. Boccaletti, S., Farini, A. & Arecchi, F.T. (1997) Adaptive synchronization of chaos for secure communication, Physical Review E, Vol. 55, No. 5, Tao, Y. (1999) Chaotic secure communication systems history and new results, Telecommun. Review, Vol. 9, pp 597-634. Ott, E., Grebogi, C. & Yorke, J.A. (1990) Controlling chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 64, pp 1196-1199. Ho, M.C. & Hung, Y.C. (2002) Synchronization of two different chaotic systems using generalized active network, Physics Letters A, Vol. 301, pp 424-428. Huang, L., Feng, R. & Wang, M. (2005) Synchronization of chaotic systems via nonlinear control, Physical Letters A, Vol. 320, pp 271-275. Chen, H.K. (2005) Global chaos synchronization of new chaotic systems via nonlinear control, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Vol. 23, pp 1245-1251. Sundarapandian, V. & Suresh, R. (2011) Global chaos synchronization of hyperchaotic Qi and Jia systems by nonlinear control, International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 83-94. Sundarapandian, V. (2011) Hybrid chaos synchronization of hyperchaotic Liu and hyperchaotic Chen systems by active nonlinear control, International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 1-14. Lu, J., Wu, X., Han, X. & L, J. (2004) Adaptive feedback synchronization of a unified chaotic system, Physics Letters A, Vol. 329, pp 327-333. 32

[6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]

[15]

[16]

International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.1, January 2012

[17]

Sundarapandian, V. (2011) Adaptive control and synchronization of hyperchaotic Liu system, International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp 29-40. Sundarapandian, V. (2011) Adaptive control and synchronization of hyperchaotic NewtonLeipnik system, International Journal of Advanced Information Technology, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp 22-33. Sundarapandian, V. (2011) Adaptive synchronization of hyperchaotic Lorenz and hyperchaotic L systems, International Journal of Instrumentation and Control Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 118. Sundarapandian, V. (2011) Adaptive control and synchronization of hyperchaotic Cai system, International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp 1-13. Sundarapandian, V. (2011) Adaptive control and synchronization of the uncertain Sprott J system, International Journal of Mathematics and Scientific Computing, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp 1418. Sundarapandian, V. (2011) Adaptive control and synchronization of Lius four-wing chaotic system with cubic nonlinearity, International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Applications, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp 127-138. Zhao, J. & Lu, J. (2006) Using sampled-data feedback control and linear feedback synchronization in a new hyperchaotic system, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, Vol. 35, pp 376382. Park, J.H. & Kwon, O.M. (2003) A novel criterion for delayed feedback control of time-delay chaotic systems, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Vol. 17, pp 709-716. Tan, X., Zhang, J. & Yang, Y. (2003) Synchronizing chaotic systems using backstepping design, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Vol. 16, pp. 37-45. Slotine, J.E. & Sastry, S.S. (1983) Tracking control of nonlinear systems using sliding surface with application to robotic manipulators, Internat. J. Control, Vol. 38, pp 465-492. Utkin, V.I. (1993) Sliding mode control design principles and applications to electric drives, IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics, Vol. 40, pp 23-36, 1993. Sundarapandian, V. and S. Sivaperumal (2011) Anti-synchronization of hyperchaotic Lorenz systems by sliding mode control, International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 6, pp 2438-2449. Sundarapandian, V. (2011) Sliding mode controller design for synchronization of ShimizuMorioka chaotic systems, International Journal of Information Sciences and Techniques, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp 20-29. Sundarapandian, V. (2011) Global chaos synchronization of four-wing chaotic systems by sliding mode control, International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp 15-31. Sundarapandian, V. (2011) Global chaos synchronization of hyperchaotic Newton-Leipnik systems by sliding mode control, International Journal of Information Technology, Convergence and Services, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp 34-43. Ge, Z.M. & Chen, C.C. (2004) Phase synchronization of coupled chaotic multiple time scales systems, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, Vol. 20, pp 639-647. Wang, Y.W. & Guan, Z.H. (2006) Generalized synchronization of continuous chaotic systems, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, Vol. 27, pp 97-101. Zhang, X. & Zhu, H. (2008) Anti-synchronization of two different hyperchaotic systems via active and adaptive control, Internat. J. Nonlinear Science, Vol. 6, pp 216-223. Chiang, T., Lin, J., Liao, T. & Yan, J. (2008) Anti-synchronization of uncertain unified chaotic systems with dead-zone nonlinearity, Nonlinear Analysis, Vol. 68, pp 2629-2637. 33

[18]

[19]

[20] [21]

[22]

[23]

[24] [25] [26] [27] [27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31] [32] [33] [34]

International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology,Vol. 2, No.1, January 2012

[35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40]

Qiang, J. (2007) Projective synchronization of a new hyperchaotic Lorenz system, Phys. Lett. A, Vol. 370, pp 40-45. Jian-Ping, Y. & Chang-Pin, L. (2006) Generalized projective synchronization for the chaotic Lorenz system and the chaotic Chen system, J. Shanghai Univ., Vol. 10, pp 299-304. Li, R.H., Xu, W. & Li, S. (2007) Adaptive generalized projective synchronization in different chaotic systems based on parameter identification, Phys. Lett. A, Vol. 367, pp 199-206. Stenflo, L. (2001) Generalized Lorenz equation for acoustic waves in the atmosphere, Physica Scripta, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp 177-180. Qi, G., Chen, Z., Du, S. & Yuan, Z. (2005) On a four-dimensional chaotic system, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, Vol. 23, pp 1671-1682. Hahn, W. (1967) The Stability of Motion, Springer, New York.

Author
Dr. V. Sundarapandian is a Professor (Systems and Control Engineering), Research and Development Centre at Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University, Chennai, India. His current research areas are: Linear and Nonlinear Control Systems, Chaos Theory, Dynamical Systems and Stability Theory, Soft Computing, Operations Research, Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing, Population Biology, etc. He has published over 210 research articles in international journals and two text-books with Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi, India. He has published over 50 papers in International Conferences and 100 papers in National Conferences. He is the Editor-in-Chief of three AIRCC control journals International Journal of Instrumentation and Control Systems, International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling, International Journal of Information Technology, Control and Automation. He is an Associate Editor of the journals International Journal of Information Sciences and Techniques, International Journal of Control Theory and Applications, International Journal of Computer Information Systems, International Journal of Advances in Science and Technology. He has delivered several Key Note Lectures on Control Systems, Chaos Theory, Scientific Computing, MATLAB, SCILAB, etc.

34