Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
After the World War II, the human mind became preoccupied by the
rights of the individual. Oftentimes, the systems of the world would not come
and go without causing oppression to the “Other,” the relative of the system,
the marginalized, the saprophagic, the homo sacer, the beast and the
Theologian, once asked Rorty, “is the oppression of Latin American people or
of the poor ones of North America caused by capitalism?” Rorty replied, “Is
there any system of the world without oppression?” Although Rorty seemed
playful in his response yet the impact is on the affirmative side. Perhaps, one
Nazi regime. His works becomes sound especially to those whose rights as a
the intellect, of knowing and of being. Levinas has been explicit in his
thematized and captured as the author said.It might be true that the
Medieval Franciscans in their own right and manner of thinking had escaped
the criticism of Levinas. It has been discussed in the article how Franciscan
starts to recognize the “Other” and responds to his/her needs. In the world
western countries, leaving the periphery of the world in its poor condition.
Since, for Levinas, it is the “Other” who commands and the center of infinite
relationship, it is now the time for the peripheral poor nations as the Other to
fail to recognize the Other, feeling trapped by the trace of his/her Face,
countries constitutes the Ego and the third world periphery is the “Other.”
However, this criticism has been broadly based on economic and material
reality. Because the article being reviewed in this paper is on itself on the
level of intellect and theory, I shall proceed then by going deeper. The truth
of today is that the Egoistic mentality is not only confined in the progressive
Philippines. Frantz Fanon in his critique of “Black Skin-White Mask” and Samir
combat neocolonialism, scholars and thinkers from the known “Other” of this
the center to criticize the center itself without overlooking the conviction of
being the “Other,” for in his/her otherness comes the realization to speak.
For “Otherness” now can speak as Spivak wrote in hercriticism entitled “Can