Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Outline Introduction
References
18 November 2009
Introduction A Simple Channel Model Key Theoretical Results Other Considerations Conclusion References
Outline Introduction A Simple Channel Model Key Theoretical Results Other Considerations Conclusion References
Introduction
Goal: Introduce Basic Concepts and Key Results of Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) Communications MIMO Systems Have Multiple Transmit and Receive Antennas
Outline Introduction A Simple Channel Model Key Theoretical Results Other Considerations Conclusion References
May Sound Similar to Other Systems: Antenna Arrays, Smart Antennas, Transmit/Receive Diversity, etc. Why Are We Interested in MIMO Systems?
Why MIMO?
Signicant Increase in Number of Wireless Users New Services Demand Higher Data Rates (Wireless Video, Internet, etc) Available Spectrum Relatively Fixed MIMO is a Spectrally Ecient Approach To Communication
Outline Introduction A Simple Channel Model Key Theoretical Results Other Considerations Conclusion References
14
12
10
0 5
0 Eb/No (dB)
10
Example Calculations
Assume a 100kHz bandwidth and desired data rate of 400kbps. With M = 1 antennas, require Eb /No = 5.7dB. For xed SNR and bandwidth, we could achieve a spectral eciency of 16bps/Hz with M = 4 antennas, i.e. a data rate of 1600kbps. A data rate 4 times that of the SISO system. For xed data rate and bandwidth, we could achieve the desired 400kbps with only Eb /No = 0dB for the M = 4 system. For xed data rate and SNR, we could achieve the desired 400kbps with only 24kHz bandwidth.
Outline Introduction A Simple Channel Model Key Theoretical Results Other Considerations Conclusion References
Outline Introduction A Simple Channel Model Key Theoretical Results Other Considerations Conclusion References
Channel Coecients Are Distributed hij CN (0, 1) i.e. complex circularly symmetric Gaussian random variables with variance 1/2 per dimension Channel Matrix Easily Generated in Matlab
H = sqrt(0.5) randn(Nt, Nr) + sqrt(0.5) randn(Nt, Nr);
(2)
Outline Introduction A Simple Channel Model Key Theoretical Results Other Considerations Conclusion References
for Nr < Nt and Nr Nt respectively Closed Form Capacity Equation for Rayleigh Fading Involving Laguerre Polynomials (Theorem 2) Demonstrated Importance of Wishart Eigenvalue Distribution (i.e. W = HH , W = H H)
Outline Introduction A Simple Channel Model Key Theoretical Results Other Considerations Conclusion References
Capacity Can Scale Linearly with SNR, Not Logarithmically (Eq. (5), i.e. spatial multiplexing) Both [1, 2] Demonstrated that Fading was Good If Taken Advantage Of But Made Key Assumptions: Independent Fades, No Correlation, Receiver Knows the Channel, etc.
Outline Introduction A Simple Channel Model Key Theoretical Results Other Considerations Conclusion References
4 5 6 Capacity (bps/Hz)
10
Outline Introduction A Simple Channel Model Key Theoretical Results Other Considerations Conclusion References
4 5 6 Capacity (bps/Hz)
10
Outline Introduction A Simple Channel Model Key Theoretical Results Other Considerations Conclusion References
10 12 14 Capacity (bps/Hz)
16
18
20
22
Outline Introduction A Simple Channel Model Key Theoretical Results Other Considerations Conclusion
Let UDVH = H be the Singular Value Decomposition of the Channel Our Channel Model is Then y = UDVH x + n Assume The Channel Is Known: Transmit Precoding and Receive Shaping Can Be Performed (7)
References
Outline
(8)
(9)
Outline Introduction A Simple Channel Model Key Theoretical Results Other Considerations Conclusion References
Figure 6: Block Diagram of Transmit Precoding and Receive Shaping [3, Fig. 10.2]
Outline Introduction A Simple Channel Model Key Theoretical Results Other Considerations Conclusion References
Other Considerations
Just The Tip of the Iceberg Still Need to Talk About
How can you measure H? What if you cant measure H? What if H changes with time? How many bits/sec can we get through the channel, with dierent H, and dierent knowledge about what H is? What is the complexity of the transmitter and receiver, especially as the number of antennas grow? What if there are multiple users? What if there is bandlimiting / intersymbol interference? How does the spacing of the antennas eect performance? What do real-world channels (H) look like? How does one use error correcting codes on these channels?
Outline Introduction A Simple Channel Model Key Theoretical Results Other Considerations Conclusion References
Summary
' MIMO Systems Use Diversity and Spatial Multiplexing to Provide Robust Performance in Fading Environments MIMO Techniques Provide Design Tradeos For Fixed Data Rate, MIMO Systems Require Less Bandwidth For Fixed Data Rate and Bandwidth, MIMO Systems Accommodate More Users For Fixed Data Rate and Bandwidth, MIMO Systems Require Less Power Channel Knowledge Plays Key Roll in Capacity and Approach to Communicating/Coding Over the Channel &
$
Outline Introduction A Simple Channel Model Key Theoretical Results Other Considerations Conclusion References
References I
Outline Introduction
E. Telatar, Capacity of multi-antenna gaussian channels, AT&T Bell Laboratories Internal Tech. Memo., June 1995. G. Foschini and M. Gans, On limits of wireless communications in a fading environment when using multiple antennas, Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 311335, Mar. 1998. A. Goldsmith, Wireless Communications. University Press, 2006. Cambridge
A Simple Channel Model Key Theoretical Results Other Considerations Conclusion References