Problem sets - General Relativity

Solutions by Sergei Winitzki

January 11, 2007
Contents
1 Coordinates and 1-forms 2
1.1 Invertible transformations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2 Examples of coordinate transformations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3 Basis in tangent space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.4 Dierentials of functions as 1-forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.5 Basis in cotangent space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.6 Linearly independent 1-forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.7 Transformation law for 1-forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.8 Examples of transformations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2 Tensors 7
2.1 Denition of tensor product . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.3 Example of tensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.5 Contraction of tensor indices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.8 Examples of spaces with a metric . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3 The Christoel symbol 9
3.1 Transformations 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.2 Transformations 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.3 Covariant derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.4 The Leibnitz rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.5 Locally inertial reference frame . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4 Geodesics and curvature 11
4.1 Geodesics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.1.1 First derivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.1.2 Second derivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.2 Commutator of covariant derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.3 Parallel transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.4 Riemann tensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.5 Lorentz transformations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
5 Gravitation theory applied 14
5.1 Redshift . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
5.2 Energy-momentum tensor 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5.3 Energy-momentum tensor 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5.4 Weak gravity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5.5 Equations of motion from conservation law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
6 The gravitational eld 17
6.1 Degrees of freedom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
6.2 Spherically symmetric spacetime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
6.2.1 Straightforward solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
6.2.2 Solution using conformal transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
6.3 Equations of motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
7 Weak gravitational elds 22
7.1 Gravitational bending of light . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
7.2 Einstein tensor for weak eld . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
7.3 Gravitational perturbations I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
7.4 Gravitational perturbations II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
1
8 Gravitational radiation I 26
8.1 Gauge invariant variables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
8.2 Detecting gravitational waves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
8.2.1 Using distances between particles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
8.2.2 Using geodesic deviation equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
8.3 Poisson equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
8.4 Metric perturbations 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
8.5 Metric perturbations 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
9 Gravitational radiation II 29
9.1 Projection of the matter tensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
9.2 Matter sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
9.3 Energy-momentum tensor of gravitational waves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
9.4 Power of emitted radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
10 Derivation: gravitational waves in at spacetime 33
A good textbook corresponding to the level of this course: General Relativity: An Introduction for Physicists by M.
P. Hobson, G. P. Efstathiou, and A. N. Lasenby (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
1 Coordinates and 1-forms
1.1 Invertible transformations
The inverse function theorem guarantees that the equations

(x) are solvable near a point x

0
if det
_

(x)/x

_
,=
0 at x
0
. Under this condition, the coordinate transformation is invertible at x
0
. Note: we are inverting not just one
function = (x), but we are determining x from a system of n equations, say

(x) = C

, where C

are n given values.

1.2 Examples of coordinate transformations
1. a) Since x = u
_
1 +v
2
_
+u
3
/3, it is clear that x has range (, +) for any xed value of v as u varies in the range
(, +). Similarly, y has the range (, +). To verify that the coordinate system (x, y) covers the entire plane,
it is sucient to show that x has the full range at every xed value of y. It is sucient to consider y
0
> 0 (else change
v v). At xed y = y
0
> 0, we have y
0
= v + vu
2
+ v
3
/3 and thus the admissible values of u are from to +,
while the admissible values of v are from 0 to v = v
max
such that y
0
= v
max
+
1
3
v
3
max
. Then
u =

y
0
v
1
3
v
3
v
(we have
y
0
v
1
3
v
3
v
0 for 0 < v < v
max
),
x =
_
1 +v
2
+
y
0
v
1
3
v
3
3v
_

y
0
v
1
3
v
3
v
=
_
2
3
+
8
9
v
2
+
y
0
3v
_

y
0
v
1
3
v
3
v
.
We have now expressed x as a function of v, i.e. x = x(v). When v varies from 0 to v
max
, x(v) varies from to 0.
Since x(v) is nonsingular for v > 0, it follows that x has the full range. Therefore, the coordinates (x, y) cover the entire
two-dimensional plane.
b) The coordinate transformation is nonsingular if
det
(x, y)
(u, v)
,= 0.
Compute:
det
_
x
u
y
u
x
v
y
v
_
= det
_
1 +u
2
+v
2
2uv
2uv 1 +u
2
+v
2
_
(1)
= 1 + 2
_
u
2
+v
2
_
+
_
u
2
v
2
_
2
> 0.
Therefore there are no singular points.
2. a) To determine the range, rst consider = 0. Then x = r sinh , y = 0, z = r cosh . It is clear that z
2
x
2
= r
2
.
Since r 0, the coordinates (x, y, z) cover only the domain [z[ > [x[. With arbitrary , it is clear that the coordinates
(x, y, z) cover the domain [z[ >
_
x
2
+y
2
.
2
b) Compute the determinant:
det
_
_
sinh cos r cosh cos r sinh sin
sinh sin r cosh sin r sinh cos
cosh r sinh 0
_
_
= r
2
sinh .
The coordinates are singular if r = 0 or = 0.
c) The singularity at r = 0 is due to the fact that the set r = 0, , corresponds to a single point x = y = z = 0.
This is similar to the singularity of the spherical coordinates at r = 0. Points along the cone [z[ =
_
x
2
+y
2
are not
covered because they correspond to , r 0. The singularity at = 0, r ,= 0 is due to the fact that the set
r, = 0, corresponds to the point x = y = 0, z = r at xed r ,= 0. This is similar to the polar coordinate singularity.
3. a) To determine the range, note that r sin 0 for the given range of and r. However, this is immaterial since the
factors cos and sin will make x, y cover the full range (, +). The coordinates (x, y, z) are a slight modication
of the standard spherical coordinates. These coordinates cover the whole space (x, y, z).
b) Compute the determinant:
det
_
_
sin cos r cos cos r sin sin
sin sin r cos sin r sin cos
cos r sin 0
_
_
= r
2
sin .
This is nonzero unless r = 0 or = 0.
c) The singularities are completely analogous to those in the spherical coordinates.
1.3 Basis in tangent space
Suppose that the vectors e

=

x

are linearly dependent, then there exist constants c

, not all zero, such that the vector

c

equals zero. Act with this vector on the coordinate function x

1
:
c

x
1
= c

x
1
= c
1
.
By assumption, c

= 0, therefore c
1
= 0. It follows that every c

equals zero, contradicting the assumption.

1.4 Dierentials of functions as 1-forms
d(x) = dx, d
_
x
2
_
= 2xdx,
d (xy) = xdy +ydx, d (x +y) = dx +dy,
d
_
4x
2
y +x
3
z
_
=
_
8xy + 3x
2
z
_
dx + 4x
2
dy +x
3
dz, d
_
3
_
x
2
+y
2
_
= 3
xdx +ydy
_
x
2
+y
2
.
Now let us compute dh by rst nding
d (arctan(x y)) =
dx dy
1 + (x y)
2
,
d
_
arctan
2x
x
2
y
2
1
_
=
1
1 +
4x
2
(x
2
y
2
1)
2
_
2dx
x
2
y
2
1

4x(xdx ydy)
(x
2
y
2
1)
2
_
=
2
_
x
2
+y
2
+ 1
_
dx + 4xydy
(x
2
y
2
1)
2
+ 4x
2
.
Adding these together and noting that
_
1 + (x +y)
2
__
1 + (x y)
2
_
=
_
x
2
y
2
1
_
2
+ 4x
2
,
we get
dh(x, y) = d
_
arctan(x + y) + arctan(x y) + arctan
2x
x
2
y
2
1
_
= 0.
This means that h(x, y) is a constant. By using the tangent sum rule, we can easily show that h(x, y) = 0.
1.5 Basis in cotangent space
Note that the relation
_
dx

,

x

_
=

3
is the denition of how the 1-form dx

acts on vectors /x

. Now, it is clear that any 1-form is decomposed as a linear

combination of the 1-forms dx
1
, ..., dx
n
. It remains to show that all these forms are linearly independent. If this were
not so, there would exist a linear combination c

dx

= 0 such that not all c

= 0. Act with this on a vector /x

1
and
obtain
0 =
_
0,

x
1
_
=
_
c

dx

,

x
1
_
= c
1
.
Therefore c
1
= 0. Similarly, we nd that every other c

= 0, which contradicts the assumption.

1.6 Linearly independent 1-forms
1. Two 1-forms d(e
x
cos y), d(e
x
siny) are linearly independent for every x, y because
d (e
x
cos y) = e
x
cos ydx e
x
sinydy,
d (e
x
sin y) = e
x
sinydx +e
x
cos ydy,
and the following determinant is always nonzero,
det
_
e
x
cos y e
x
siny
e
x
siny e
x
cos y
_
= e
2x
,= 0.
2. Two 1-forms (1 +y)dx 2xydy, 8dx are linearly independent if the following determinant is nonzero,
det
_
1 +y 2xy
8 0
_
= 16xy.
This happens for xy ,= 0.
3. Three 1-forms dx +dy, dx +dz, dy +dz are always linearly independent.
4. Three 1-forms dx dy, dy dz, dz dx are always linearly dependent (their sum is zero).
1.7 Transformation law for 1-forms
The transformation law for 1-forms,
d x

=
x

dx

,
under a coordinate transformation x

= x

(x

), is merely a dierent interpretation of the denition of the 1-form

d x

(see Problem 1.4), where x

(x) is considered a scalar function in the coordinates

_
x

_
.
1.8 Examples of transformations
a) First compute dx and dy:
dx =
_
1 +u
2
+v
2
_
du + (2uv) dv,
dy = (2uv) du +
_
1 +u
2
+v
2
_
dv.
Then it is easy to compute xdx +ydy,etc. For instance,
d
1
x +y
=
dx +dy
(x +y)
2
=
(du +dv)
_
1 + (u +v)
2
_
(u +v)
2
_
1 +
1
3
(u +v)
2
_
2
.
b) The component transformation matrix is given in Eq. (1).
1A Tangent plane
If the tangent plane is at angle with the horizontal, then the acceleration is g sin (from elementary mechanics). Since
0 <

2
, we need to maximize or, equivalently, tan, which equals
z
r
=
rh

2
e

1
2
r
2

2
, r
_
x
2
+y
2
.
The maximum of z/r is at r
0
= . For example, a point with maximum acceleration is x
0
= , y
0
= 0, z
0
= he

1
2
.
The tangent plane at a point (x
0
, y
0
, z
0
) is given by the equation
n
x
(x x
0
) +n
y
(y y
0
) +n
z
(z z
0
) = 0,
4
where (n
x
, n
y
, n
z
) are the components of the normal vector,
(n
x
, n
y
, n
z
) =
_
z
x
,
z
y
, 1
_

x0,y0,z0
=
_
e

1
2
h

, 0, 1
_
.
Therefore the equation of the tangent plane is
x

1
2
+
z
h
= 0.
1B Induced metric
The induced metric is found by taking the expression for the bulk metric, g = dx
2
+dy
2
+dz
2
, and computing dx, dy, dz
through the forms d and d:
dx = 2a sin cos cos d a sin
2
sin d,
dy = 2a sin cos sin d +a sin
2
cos d,
dz = a cos 2.
Therefore
g = dx
2
+dy
2
+dz
2
= a
2
sin
2
2d
2
+a
2
cos
2
2d
2
.
The metric is degenerate at = 0 and =

2
. However, these singularities are coordinate singularities that disappear
when choosing a dierent coordinate system. For example, in a neighborhood of = 0 one may choose = cos as the
coordinate instead of , and then
g = 4a
2

2
d
2
+ a
2
_
2
2
1
_
2
d
2
,
which is nondegenerate near = 1 (corresp. to = 0). The situation near =

2
is similar. Therefore, the surface is
well-dened everywhere. (Note: this is basically the spherical coordinate system with 2 instead of . So the surface is a
sphere.)
1C Embedding waves
The surface is dened by
x =
cos v

2 sin u
, y =
sin v

2 sin u
, z =
cos u

2 sin u
.
1. For y = 0, we have v = 0 and thus
x =
1

2 sin u
, z =
cos u

2 sinu
.
To visualize this line in the (x, z) plane, we eliminate u from these equations and nd
sin u =

2
1
x
,
_
x

2
_
2
+z
2
= 1.
Therefore the line is a circle of radius 1 centered at
_
x =

2, z = 0
_
. This circle does not intersect the z axis since

2 > 1. Now we see that (x, y) is obtained from

_
2 sin u
_
1
by multiplying with cos v and sin v. Therefore,
the full surface is a rotation surface, where we need to use the x coordinate as the radius. Therefore, the gure in
the (x, z) plane needs to be rotated around the z axis. The resulting surface is a torus. It may be described by the
equation
_
_
x
2
+y
2

2
_
2
+z
2
1 = 0.
Note that
_
x
2
+y
2
=
1

2 sin u
> 0.
Also
_
x
2
+y
2

2 =
1

2
_
2 sinu
_

2 sin u
=

2 sin u 1

2 sin u
.
2. Since the surface is now given by an equation of the form F(x, y, z) = 0, the normal vector (up to a constant factor
C) can be found as
(n
x
, n
y
, n
z
) = C
_
F
x
,
F
y
,
F
z
_
= C
_
2
_
x
2
+y
2

2
_
x
2
+y
2
x, 2
_
x
2
+y
2

2
_
x
2
+y
2
y, 2z
_
.
Multiplying by C
1
2
_
x
2
+y
2
(this factor is chosen for simplicity), we have
(n
x
, n
y
, n
z
) =
_
x
_
_
x
2
+y
2

2
_
, y
_
_
x
2
+y
2

2
_
, z
_
x
2
+y
2
_
.
5
Expressed through the coordinates (u, v), this becomes
n

= (n
x
, n
y
, n
z
) =
_
cos v

2 sin u 1
_
2 sinu
_
2
, sin v

2 sinu 1
_
2 sin u
_
2
,
cos u
_
2 sin u
_
2
_
.
The equation of the tangent plane at point x
0
is
n

_
x

(0)
_
= 0,
where n

must be computed at x = x
0
.
3. We compute
x
u
=
cos v cos u
_
2 sin u
_
2
,
x
v
=
sin v

2 sin u
,
y
u
=
sin v cos u
_
2 sin u
_
2
,
y
v
=
cos v

2 sin u
,
z
u
=
1

2 sin u
_
2 sin u
_
2
,
z
v
= 0.
Now we can expand
dx =
x
u
du +
x
v
dv, etc.
Therefore the induced metric is
g = dx
2
+dy
2
+dz
2
=
_
_
_
cos u
_
2 sinu
_
2
_
2
+
_
1

2 sin u
_
2 sinu
_
2
_
2
_
_
du
2
+
dv
2
_
2 sin u
_
2
=
du
2
+dv
2
_
2 sin u
_
2
.
The vector V
a
= (cos v, sin v) is not a unit vector because
g(V, V ) =
cos
2
v + sin
2
v
_
2 sin u
_
2
=
1
_
2 sin u
_
2
,= 1.
The Cartesian components of the vectors /u, /v are found from

u
=
x(u, v)
u

x
+
y(u, v)
u

y
+
z(u, v)
u

z
,

v
=
x(u, v)
v

x
+
y(u, v)
v

y
+
z(u, v)
v

z
.
Therefore, the vector V
a
has the following Cartesian components,
V = cos v
_

sin v

2 sin u

x
+
cos v

2 sin u

y
_
+ sin v
_
cos v cos u
_
2 sin u
_
2

x
+
sin v cos u
_
2 sin u
_
2

y
+
1

2 sin u
_
2 sin u
_
2

z
_
= sinv cos v
_
sin u + cos u

2
_
2 sinu
_
2
_

x
+
_
sin
2
v cos u +

2 cos
2
v sin u cos
2
v
_
2 sin u
_
2
_

y
+ sin v
1

2 sin u
_
2 sin u
_
2

z
.
This vector is within the tangent plane because n

= 0,
n

= cos v

2 sin u 1
_
2 sinu
_
2
sin v cos v
_
sinu + cos u

2
_
2 sin u
_
2
_
+ sin v

2 sinu 1
_
2 sin u
_
2
_
sin
2
v cos u +

2 cos
2
v

2 sin u cos
2
v
_
2 sin u
_
2
_
+
cos u
_
2 sin u
_
2
sinv
1

2 sin u
_
2 sin u
_
2
(after simplication) = 0.
6
2 Tensors
2.1 Denition of tensor product
a),b) A direct calculation using the property

dx
i
, /x
k
_
=
i
k
gives:

1
, v
1
) =
_
dx + 2ydy, 3

x
_
= 3, etc.
The results:
T(v
1
, v
1
) = 0, T(v
1
, v
2
) = 6x.
c) d) First, show that the sum of two linear functions is again a linear function: If A(x) and B(x) are linear functions,
i.e. if
A(x +y) = A(x) +A(y)
and likewise for B, then A+B obviously has the same property. Now, since a tensor is dened as a multi-linear function,
it is clear that tensors form a vector space.
2.3 Example of tensor
a) An obvious example of such T is the vector product, T(u, v) = uv, dened in three-dimensional space. To determine
the rank of T, we need to represent T as a multilinear number-valued function of some number of 1-forms and vectors,
e.g. A(f
1
, ..., f
r
, v
1
, ..., v
s
). It is clear that T(v
1
, v
2
) itself is not such a function because it has vector values instead of
scalar (number) values. So we need to add a 1-form to the list of arguments. We can dene
A(f
1
, v
1
, v
2
) = f
1
, T(v
1
, v
2
))
and then its clear that A is multilinear. Therefore T is a tensor of rank 1+2.
b) The calculation may go as follows. We need to determine the components T

such that
[T(u, v)]

= T

.
So we rewrite the given denition of T(u, v) in the index notation, e.g. like this:
[T(u, v)]

= 2

.
Now we would like to move u

out of the brackets and so determine T

. However, the expression above contains

u

instead of u

. Therefore we rename the index to and also introduce a Kronecker symbol

, so as to rewrite
identically
u

= u

.
Therefore
[T(u, v)]

= 2

=
_
2

_
u

,
T

= 2

.
2.5 Contraction of tensor indices
a) Using the denition of a tensor as a multilinear function, it is easy to show that linear combinations of tensors are also
multilinear functions. Tensor products and contractions are also multilinear. The arguments are much simpler than the
proof of tensor transformation law for components.
b) Contracting two lower indices, e.g. T

, gives components of a quantity which is not a tensor because these

components do not transform correctly under changes of basis. If T

were a tensor it would transform as

=
x

.
However, this does not agree with the contraction of the tensor T

, which transforms as

=
x

.
The contraction over = yields

,=
x

.
c) Calculation gives
T

= 2

= 3n

because

= 0 and

= 3.
7
2.8 Examples of spaces with a metric
a) We perform the calculation in components,
g(u, v) = u

.
We would like to write g(u, v) = g

, where g

are the components of the metric tensor. Using the known identity
for the -symbol,

,
we nd
g(u, v) = u

) u

= u

+u

.
Denote n
2
n

g(n, n), and then we need to relabel indices such that v

can be moved outside the parentheses.

The result is
g(u, v) =
_

n
2

+n

_
v

.
Therefore
g

n
2

+n

.
To analyze the conditions under which det g

,= 0, we can choose an orthonormal basis such that n

is parallel to the
rst basis vector. Then the components of the vector n in this basis are ([n[ , 0, 0) and the matrix g

has the following

simple form:
g

=
_
_
1 0 0
0 1 n
2
0
0 0 1 n
2
_
_
.
Then it is clear that det g

=
_
1 n
2
_
2
. Therefore, the matrix g

is nondegenerate if n
2
,= 1.
b) Similar calculations give
g

=
_
3 +n
2
0
0 3
_
.
Therefore the determinant of g

is always nonzero.
c) Considerations are analogous to b), except that the size of the matrix g

is larger.
d) The metric is (dx)
2
+ (dy)
2
+ (dz)
2
, and we need to express dx, dy, dz through du and dv. A calculation gives
g = dx
2
+dy
2
+dz
2
= R
2
_
sinh
2
u + cosh
2
u
_
du
2
+R
2
cosh
2
u dv
2
.
2A Vector equations
a) The equation contains two given vectors A

and B

. The solution x

can be found as a linear combination of A

,
B

, and the cross product

with unknown coecients. Using vector notation, we have

x = A+B+ (AB) .
Substituting this expression into the given equation,
kx +x A = B,
and using the known identity
(AB) C = B(A C) A(B C) , (2)
we nd
A(k A B) +B(k + A A1) + (A B) (k ) = 0.
On purpose, we write this equation in the form of linear combination of the three vectors A, B, and A B. Since we
are considering the generic case, these three vectors are independent and so each of the coecients above must be zero:
k A B = 0, k +A A1 = 0, k = 0.
Solving this system of equations, we nd (assuming k ,= 0 in the generic case)
=
A B
k
, =
1 A A
k
, =
1 A A
k
2
.
b) We have in vector notation
x A = B, x C = k.
Multiply C:
(x A) C = BC.
8
Simplify using the identity (2),
A(x C) x(A C) = kAx(A C) = BC.
Therefore
x =
kABC
A C
.
c), d) The equations have the form x

= A

, where M

is a matrix and A

is a known vector. The solution is

x = M
1
A, where M
1
is the inverse matrix (it exists in the generic case).
2B Tensor equations
a) Since the vectors A

and B

are a basis in two-dimensional space (in the generic case they are linearly independent),
then the symmetric tensor X

can be written as
X

= fA

+g
_
A

+A

_
+hB

,
where the coecients f, g, h are unknown. It remains to determine these coecients. Using A

= 0 and denoting
A

[A[
2
, we get the system of equations
X

= B

(f +g) [A[
2
= 1,
X

= 0 (g +h) [B[
2
= 0,
X

= 0 f [A[
2
+h[B[
2
= 0.
The result is
X

=
1
[A[
2
[B[
2
[B[
2
[A[
2
A

+
1
[B[
2
[A[
2
_
B

.
b) An antisymmetric tensor X

in three dimensions can be always expressed as

X

,
where u

is an unknown vector that we need to determine. We can now rewrite the conditions on X

in a vector form,
X

= B

u A = B
X

= 0 u B = 0
It follows that u is parallel to B and then the condition uA = B leaves the only solution u = 0, and therefore X

= 0
is the only admissible solution.
2C Degeneracy of the metric
a) The metric can be written in the basis dx, dy as the matrix
g =
_
y
2
1 +x
2
1 +x
2
0
_
.
The determinant of this matrix is
_
1 +x
2
_
2
which is always nonzero.
b) In the basis where A

is parallel to the rst basis vector, the vector A

has components (A, 0, 0, 0, ...) and therefore

the metric g

has the form

_
_
_
_
_
r
2
0 0 ...
0 1 0
0 0 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
_
_
_
_
_
.
The metric is degenerate if r = 0 (i.e. at the origin).
3 The Christoel symbol
3.1 Transformations 1
We are considering a at space where Euclidean coordinates exist. Suppose x

and x

are two coordinate systems,

while

is the standard Euclidean coordinate system. The Christoel symbols are dened as

=

2

=

2

.
9
The relationship between

and can be found as follows. Assuming that the functions x

( x) and also x

(x) are known,

we may express the partial derivative operators using the chain rule,

=
x

=
x

.
Also we can express
x

=
x

.
Therefore we can calculate

(when

is known) as follows,

=
x

_
x

__
x

=
x

_
x

+

2
x

_
=
x

+

2
x

=
x

+

2
x

. (3)
Note that the Euclidean coordinate system

is not needed to determine the transformation of .

3.2 Transformations 2
Consider a vector eld u

. Assume that

obeys the correct transformation law for rank (1,1) tensors,

=
_

_
x

,
and substitute

.
We can now express through

. Note that
x

because the matrices are x

/x

and x

/ x

are inverse to each other. The result is

+

2
x

.
3.3 Covariant derivatives
The rule is that every upper index gets a + and every lower index gets a . Each term with replaces one index in
the original tensor by one of the indices in . Therefore we can write the answer as
T

;
=

3.4 The Leibnitz rule

Perform an explicit calculation,
A
;
B

+A

;
= B

_
+A

_
;
_
A

_
;
=

_
A

.
This proves the required property.
10
3.5 Locally inertial reference frame
In this problem (unlike problem 3.1) the coordinate system

is not a at Euclidean coordinate system, but it is just

a coordinate system which is like Euclidean at one point. Now we want to use the formula (3), which will enable us to
compute the Christoel symbol

in the coordinate system , given the Christoel symbol in the original coordinate
system x

. To use that formula, we need to compute some derivatives. Denoting x

, we nd
x

+
_
x

(0)
_

(0)
=

+
_
x

(0)
_

(0)
.
The inverse derivative, x

/ x

, can be found by inverting this matrix; the result can be found simply by assuming that
x

+
_
x

(0)
_
A

+O
_
(x x
(0)
)
2
_
,
where A

is an unknown matrix. So up to quadratic terms we nd

x

_
x

(0)
_

(0)
+O
_
(x x
(0)
)
2
_
.
Therefore

2
x

(0)
+O
_
x x
(0)
_
.
Finally, we nd

=
x

+

2
x

(0)
+O
_
x x
(0)
_
.
At x = x
0
we have

(0)
. It follows that the new Christoel symbol is equal to zero at x = x
0
.
Alternatively, one can use the transformation law for the Christoel symbol in the inverse direction, =

... + ...,
i.e. one denotes x

, x

. This has the advantage that only derivatives

2
/xx need to be computed,
and not the derivatives
2
x/. Since all derivatives only need to be evaluated at x = x
0
, the rst-order derivatives
x/ at x = x
0
can be found as the inverse matrix to

/x

, i.e. x

. This considerably simplies

the calculations.
4 Geodesics and curvature
4.1 Geodesics
(a) Note that d/ds is the ordinary (not covariant) derivative in the direction of u

. The geodesic equation can be

rewritten for the 1-form u

as
u

u
;
= 0 =
du

ds

.
An explicit formula for

yields

=

u

=
1
2
(g
,
+g
,
g
,
) u

.
Note that g
,
g
,
is antisymmetric in ( ). Therefore these terms will cancel after a contraction with u

.
The remaining term yields

=
1
2
g
,
u

.
b) We give two derivations; the rst one is direct and the second one uses the property (a).
4.1.1 First derivation
Note that
d
ds
_
g

_
= u

_
g

_
,
where we must use an ordinary derivative instead of the covariant derivative (according to the denition of d/ds). So we
nd
u

_
g

_
,
= g
,
u

+ 2g

,
.
Now we need to simplify an expression containing u

,
. By assumption, the derivative of the vector eld u

satises
d
ds
u

= u

,
+

= 0
= u

,
+
1
2
g

(g
,
+g
,
g
,
) u

.
11
Therefore
u

,
=
1
2
u

(g
,
+g
,
g
,
) u

=
1
2
u

(g
,
+g
,
g
,
) u

=
1
2
g
,
u

.
What remains is a straightforward computation:
u

_
g

_
,
= g
,
u

+ 2g

,
= g
,
u

g
,
u

= 0.
4.1.2 Second derivation
We write
d
ds
_
g

_
=
d
ds
_
g

_
= u

,
u

+ 2g

u
,
u

.
Now we need to express u
,
u

du

/ds. To do that, we use the property derived in (a),

du

ds
=
1
2
g
,
u

,
and nd
d
ds
_
g

_
=
dg

ds
u

+g

g
,
u

=
dg

ds
u

+
dg

ds
u

.
It remains to express the derivative of g

through the derivative of g

. We use the identity

d
ds
_
g

_
=
d
ds
_

_
= 0,
thus
dg

ds
g

=
dg

ds
g

dg

ds
=
dg

ds
g

.
Therefore
dg

ds
u

=
dg

ds
g

=
dg

ds
u

,
and thus
d
ds
_
g

_
= 0.
4.2 Commutator of covariant derivatives
First compute
u

;
= u

,
+

,
u

;
=
_
u

,
+

_
,
+

_
u

,
+

_
u

,
+

_
= u

,
+

,
u

,
+

,
+

;
.
Since we want to compute the commutator u

;
u

;
, we can omit the terms that are symmetric in ( ). These
terms are the following:
u

,
,

,
+

,
,

;
.
The remaining terms are
u

;
=

,
u

+ (symmetric in ) ,
which yields
u

;
u

;
= u

,
+

_
= u

.
12
4.3 Parallel transport
The parallel-transported vector can be represented by a 1-form A

(s) such that

dA

ds

g
A

= 0, u

dx

ds
.
However, the closed curve is assumed to cover only a very small neighborhood of one point x
0
, so we can approximate
A

by a constant, A

(x
0
), along the curve. Therefore
A

=
_
dA

ds
ds =
_

(x)A

(x)dx

(x
0
)
_

(x)dx

.
Now, in a locally inertial system at x
0
we have

(x
0
) = 0. Therefore we can Taylor expand

(x) near x
0
as

(x) =
_
x

0
_

,
+O
_
(x x
0
)
2
_
.
Therefore
A

(x
0
)
_

,
_
x

0
_
dx

(x
0
)

,
(x
0
)
_
x

dx

,
where we have again approximated

,
(x) by its value at x = x
0
, and also used the identity
_
dx

= 0. Further,
_
d
_
x

_
= 0 =
_
x

dx

+
_
x

dx

.
Therefore we may rewrite
A

,
_
x

dx

=
1
2
A

,
_
_
x

dx

=
1
2
A

_
x

dx

.
4.4 Riemann tensor
a) It is more convenient to consider the fully covariant tensor R

. This tensor has the following symmetries,

R

= R

= R

, (4)
R

+R

+R

= 0, (5)
R

= R

. (6)
However, it is known that the property (6) follows from (4)-(5), therefore it is sucient to consider these two properties
[note that (5) does not follow from (4), (6)]. Let us rst consider the property (4). For xed , , we have that R

is an antisymmetric n n matrix (indices , ). This matrix has

1
2
n(n 1) independent components. Likewise for xed
, . Therefore, the number of independent components of R

is reduced to
N
1
=
_
1
2
n(n 1)
_
2
.
Now we use the property (5). Let us see whether the property (5) is nontrivial at xed . If = , then the property (5)
becomes
R

+R

+R

= 0 (no summation),
which is already a consequence of (4). Likewise for = or for = . Therefore, the property (5) is a new constraint
only if all three indices , , are dierent (i.e. ,= , ,= , ,= ). Suppose that , , are dierent. There are
N
2
=
1
6
n(n 1)(n 2)
choices of such , , . Therefore, for each = 1, ..., n we obtain N
2
additional constraints. Finally, let us check that
every such constraint is nontrivial for every (even if is equal to one of , , ). Suppose = , then (5) becomes
R

+R

+R

= 0 (no summation).
This is a nontrivial constraint (equivalent to R

= R

). Therefore, the number of constraints is nN

2
, and thus
the total number of independent components of R

is
N = N1 nN
2
=
n
2
_
n
2
1
_
12
.
b) Weinberg, Chapter 6, 8
13
c) There is only one independent component of R

in two dimensions. For instance, we can choose R

1212
as the
independent parameter. Then we can express the Ricci tensor as
R

= g

.
Calculating component by component, we nd
R
11
= g
22
R
1212
, R
12
= g
12
R
1212
, R
22
= g
11
R
1212
,
R = g

=
_
2g
11
g
22
2g
12
g
21
_
R
1212
= 2gR
1212
.
Note that the matrix
_
g
22
g
12
g
12
g
11
_
is equal to the inverse matrix to g

(which is g

), multiplied by the determinant det g

; since det g

= 1/g, we have
_
g
22
g
12
g
12
g
11
_
= gg

.
Therefore
G

= R

1
2
g

R = gg

R
1212

1
2
g

2gR
1212
= 0.
4.5 Lorentz transformations
A Lorentz transformation is represented by a matrix

such that

= g

.
Consider an innitesimal Lorentz transformation,

+H

.
The number of parameters in Lorentz transformations is the same as the number of parameters in H

. The condition
for H

is
(

+H

)
_

+H

_
g

= g

.
Disregarding terms of order
2
, we nd
0 =

= H

+H

.
Therefore, H

is an antisymmetric n n matrix, which has

1
2
n(n 1) independent components. For n = 4 we get 6
components. These can be interpreted as three spatial rotations and three Lorentz rotations (boosts).
5 Gravitation theory applied
5.1 Redshift
In the weak eld limit, the Newtonian gravitational potential near a mass M is
=
GM
r
,
while the component g
00
of the metric is
g
00
= 1 +
2
c
2
.
(We write the units explicitly.) Therefore the redshift factor z(r) at distance r from the center of the Earth is
z(r) =
_
1 +
2GM
c
2
r
1 +
GM
c
2
r
.
To compare the redshift factors at the surface of the Earth, denote by R
E
the radius of the Earth. We know that the
gravitational acceleration at the surface is
g
E
=
GM
R
2
E
9.81
m
s
2
.
Therefore, it is convenient to express GM = g
E
R
2
E
. For a vertical distance L between sender and receiver, we nd
z(R
E
)
z(R
E
+L)
=
1 +g
E
R
E
c
2
1 +g
E
R
E
c
2
RE
RE+L
1 +
g
E
R
E
c
2
_
1
R
E
R
E
+L
_
= 1 +
g
E
R
E
L
c
2
(R
E
+L)
.
Since in our problem L R
E
, we may approximate
z(R
E
)
z(R
E
+L)
1 +
g
E
L
c
2
1 + 1.1
L
10
16
m
.
14
5.2 Energy-momentum tensor 1
In the nonrelativistic limit, we may disregard gravitation; g

. The EMT of an ideal uid is

T

= p

+ (p +) u

,
where u

is the 4-velocity vector of the uid motion. In the nonrelativistic limit, u

(1, v), where v is the 3-vector of

velocity and [v[ 1 in the units where c = 1.
The conservation law is
0 = T

,
= p
,
+ (p +)
,
u

+ (p +) u

,
+ (p +) u

,
u

.
Let us simplify this expression by introducing the time derivative along the uid ow,
d
dt
u

.
Then we nd
0 = p
,
+u

_
p + + (p +) u

,
_
+ (p +) u

. (7)
Contracting with u

and using u

= 0, we nd
+ (p +) u

,
= 0. (8)
This is the relativistic continuity equation. Using this equation, we nd from Eq. (7) that
0 = p
,
+u

p + (p +) u

. (9)
Now let us apply the nonrelativistic limit, u

(1, v), to Eqs. (8) and (9). In our notation, for any quantity X we
have

X
d
dt
X

t
X + (v ) X.
The continuity equation (8) gives
d
dt
+ (p +) divv = 0.
This is the ordinary, nonrelativistic continuity equation.
1
Finally, Eq. (9) gives

p +v p + (p +)

v = 0.
(Note that p
,j
=
j
p.) This is the Euler equation,
dv
dt
=
1
p +
_

p v
dp
dt
_
.
5.3 Energy-momentum tensor 2
Compute the covariant derivative,
T

;
=
_

1
2
g

;
_
;
=
;
;

;
+
;

;
;
g

;
=
;
;

;
.
Here we used
;
=
;
which follows from

(note that is a scalar; covariant derivatives do not commute

when applied to vectors!) and also the property

;
;
X

=
;
X

,
which is due to g
;
= 0. Therefore, we get

;
;

;
= 0;
this entails
;
;
= 0 (since
;
= 0 is a weaker condition than
;
;
= 0, i.e. if
;
= 0 then also
;
;
= 0, so it is
sucient to write the latter).
1
Note that in the usual, nonrelativistic continuity equations as they are written in most books, there is no p + - just . This is so
because in most cases the matter is nonrelativistic, so p and p + . This is, however, not true for relativistic matter, such as photons
(electromagnetic radiation) for which p =
1
3
.
15
5.4 Weak gravity
A very short solution is to write R
00
directly through and note that only

00,
comes in (if we disregard terms of
second order). Then compute

00
explicitly through . (Assume that g
,0
= 0.) We may disregard terms of order
because is of order , and also we may raise and lower indices using

instead of g

. (This is somewhat heuristic;

see below.) The calculation goes like this:
R
00
=

00,

0,0
+O( ),

00
=
1
2

(g
0,0
+g
0,0
g
00,
) =

,
,
therefore (using
,0
= 0)
R
00
=

,
= =
,00
+
,11
+
,22
+
,33
= .
Here is another, somewhat more comprehensive solution. In the weak eld limit, we write
g

+h

.
Then we only compute everything up to rst order in h

. Therefore, we may raise and lower indices using the Minkowski

metric

instead of g

.
Note: the Newtonian limit does not determine the components of g

except for g
00
= 1 +2. The actual metric g

is equal to

plus a small rst-order deviation, h

, but this deviation cannot be expressed just through the Newtonian

potential
1
2
h
00
. In principle, one needs to solve the full Einstein equations to nd h

; in other words, one needs to

determine other, post-Newtonian potentials and not just the Newtonian potential . However, when one only wants
to compute eects of gravitation on motion of slow bodies, only g
00
is necessary. So it is sucient to compute just the
Newtonian potential . But e.g. trajectories of light rays cannot be computed accurately in the Newtonian limit (because
light does not move slowly). To compute trajectories of light rays, one needs all components of h

, not just h
00
.
Let us do the computation through h

in a more general way. First we compute the Christoel symbol and the Ricci
tensor:

=
1
2

(h
,
+h
,
h
,
) ; O();
R

= R

,
+

,
.
(We may disregard the terms since they are second order in .) Now we compute (again up to rst order in )

,
=
1
2

(h
,
+h
,
h
,
) =
1
2

h
,
,
R

=
1
2

(h
,
+h
,
h
,
h
,
) .
Let us now compute just the component R
00
, recalling that h

is time-independent (so h
,0
= 0) and h
00
= 2:
R
00
=
1
2

(h
0,0
+h
0,0
h
00,
h
,00
) =
1
2

h
00,
=

,
= .
5.5 Equations of motion from conservation law
We would like to rewrite the covariant conservation law T

;
= 0 through ordinary derivatives. The given relations are
useful; lets derive them rst.

g =
1
2

g
_

x

g
_
=
1
2

g
_
gg

g
,
_
=
1
2

gg

g
,
;

=
1
2
g

(g
,
+g
,
g
,
) =
1
2
g

g
,
=
1

g.
Now rewrite the covariant derivative of T

explicitly:
T

;
= T

,
+

=
1

g
_
gT

_
,
+

.
Apply this to the given T

:
0 = T

;
=
m
0

g
__
ds
dx

ds
dx

ds

(4)
(x

(s))
_
,
+
m
0

g
_
ds
dx

ds
dx

ds

(x)
(4)
(x

(s)).
16
Since in the rst term the dependence on x

is only through
(4)
, we can rewrite
dx

ds

(4)
(x

(s))
_
=
d
ds
_

(4)
(x

(s))
_
(this is easily understood if read from right to left) and then integrate by parts,
_
ds
dx

ds
d
ds

(4)
(x

(s)) =
_
ds
d
2
x

ds
2

(4)
(x

(s)).
Finally,
0 =

g
m
0
T

;
=
_
ds
_
d
2
x

ds
2
+

dx

ds
dx

ds
_

(4)
(x

(s)).
This is a function of x

which should equal zero everywhere. Therefore, the integrand should vanish for every value of s,
d
2
x

ds
2
+

dx

ds
dx

ds
= 0.
Remark: in general, equations of motion do not follow from conservation law, but they do follow if there is only one
eld. (e.g. one uid, or one scalar eld, or some number of point particles). The situation in ordinary mechanics is similar:
e.g. the equation of motion for a particle follow from the conservation of energy only if the motion is in one dimension:
E =
mv
2
2
+V (x) = const,
0 =
dE
dt
= (m v +V

(x)) v m v = V

(x).
However, equations of motion do not follow from conservation of energy if there is more than one degree of freedom.
Similarly, equations of motion for say two scalar elds , do not follow from the conservation of their combined T

.
These elds have two dierent equations of motion, and one cannot hope to derive them from a single conservation law.
6 The gravitational eld
6.1 Degrees of freedom
The electromagnetic eld is described by a 4-vector potential A

(x). This would give 4 degrees of freedom. However,

there is also a gauge symmetry,
A

+
,
,
where (x) is an arbitrary function of spacetime. Using this gauge symmetry, we may e.g. set the component A
0
(x) = 0.
Then only three functions of spacetime (A
1
, A
2
, A
3
) are left. Hence the electromagnetic eld has 3 degrees of freedom.
There are additional gauge symmetries involving functions (x) that do not depend on time. Since these functions (x)
are functions only of three arguments, they do not change the number of degrees of freedom.
6.2 Spherically symmetric spacetime
6.2.1 Straightforward solution
A direct computation listing all the possible Christoel symbols and components of the Ricci tensor is certainly straight-
forward but very long. Here is a way to compute the curvature tensor without writing individual components. Since the
metric has a diagonal form, let us denote
g

, g

1
A

(no summation!), (10)

where
A

_
e
N
, e
L
, r
2
, r
2
sin
2

_
(11)
is a xed array of four functions. For this calculation, we do not use the Einstein summation convention any more; every
summation will be written explicitly. However, we make heavy use of the fact that

,= 0 only if = , and that

. At the end of the calculation of the Ricci tensor R

, we shall substitute the known functions A

and use
the resulting simplications.
We begin with the calculation of the Christoel symbols,

1
2

1
A

A
,
+

A
,

A
,
]
=
1
2

A
,
A

+
1
2

A
,
A

1
2

A
,
A

. (12)
17
Note that the summation over results in setting = due to

, and that we have relations such as

and

, which hold without summation. For convenience, we rewrite Eq. (12) as

=
1
2
_

B
,
+

B
,

B
,
_
,
where we dened the auxiliary function
B

ln A

.
As a check, we compute the trace of the Christoel symbols and compare with the known formula,

=
1
2
_
B
,
+

B
,

B
,
_
=
1
2

B
,
=
_
ln

g
_
,
.
Let us also denote for brevity
C ln

g =
1
2

= C
,
.
We proceed to the computation of the Ricci tensor. We use the formula (with Landau-Lifshitz sign conventions)
R

,
_
+

,
_

_
.
We now compute the necessary terms:

,
=
1
2
B
,
+
1
2
B
,

1
2

_
A

B
,
_
,
,

,
= C
,
,

C
,
1
2
_

B
,
+
1
2

B
,

1
2

B
,
_
=
1
2
_
C
,
B
,
+C
,
B
,

C
,

B
,
_
,

=
1
4

,
_

B
,
+

B
,

B
,
_ _

B
,
+

B
,

B
,
_
=
1
4

B
,
_

B
,
+

B
,

B
,
_
(here set = )
+
1
4

B
,
_
B
,
+

B
,

B
,
_
(here set = )

1
4

B
,
_

B
,
+

B
,

B
,
_
(here set = )
=
1
4
B
,
B
,
+
1
4
B
,
B
,

1
4

B
,
B
,
+
1
4

B
,
B
,
+
1
4
B
,
B
,

1
4
B
,
B
,

1
4
B
,
B
,

1
4

B
,
B
,
+
1
4
B
,
B
,
=
1
2
B
,
B
,

1
2

B
,
B
,
+
1
4

B
,
B
,
.
Finally, we put all the terms together:
R

=
_
1
2
B

+
1
2
B

C
_
,

1
2

_
_
B
,
A

_
,
+C
,
B
,
A

_
+
1
2
C
,
B
,
+
1
2
C
,
B
,

1
2
B
,
B
,

1
4

B
,
B
,
.
18
We can simplify this expression by considering separately diagonal and o-diagonal components:
R

= (B

C)
,

1
2

_
_
B
,
A

_
,
+C
,
B
,
A

_
+
_
C
,

1
2
B
,
_
B
,

1
4

B
,
B
,
;
R

=
1
2
_
B

+B

_
,
+
1
2
(C
,
B
,
+C
,
B
,
B
,
B
,
)

1
4

B
,
B
,
. (only for ,= )
Now we need to simplify this expression further by using the specic form of the metric (10)-(11). We have
A
t
= e
N
, A
r
= e
L
, A

= r
2
, A

= r
2
sin
2
;
B
t
= N, B
r
= L, B

= 2 lnr, B

= 2 lnr + 2 ln sin ;
C = ln

g =
N +L
2
+ 2 lnr + ln sin ;
C
,t
=

N +

L
2
, C
,r
=
N

+L

2
+
2
r
, C
,
= cot , C
,
= 0.
Note that the term
1
2
_
B

+B

_
,
(13)
always vanishes when ,= . We nd (after some omitted algebra):
R

=
1
2
r
2
sin
2

_
_
__
ln
_
r
2
sin
2

_
,
A

_
,
+C
,
_
ln
_
r
2
sin
2

_
,
A

_
_
= r
2
sin
2

__
N

2r
+
1
r
2
_
e
L

1
r
2
_
;
R

= 1 r
2
e
L
_
N

2r
+
1
r
2
_
;
R
t
= R
r
= R

= R
t
= 0;
R
r
=
1
2
C
,
B
,r

1
4
B
,r
B
,
=
1
2
cot
2
r

1
4
2
r
2 cot = 0;
R
tr
=
1
2
_

N +

L
2
N

+
_
N

+L

2
+
2
r
_

L

NL

1
4

NN

1
4

LL

L
r
;
R
rr
=
N

2
+
2
r
2
+N

4
+
1
2
e
LN
_

L +

L

N
2

L
_
+
1
r
L

;
R
tt
=

L
2
+

L

N

L
4
+
1
2
e
NL
_
N

+
_
N

2
+
2
r
_
N

_
.
Finally, we compute the Ricci scalar,
R =

1
A

= e
N
_

L
2
+

L

N

L
4
_
+
1
2
e
L
_
N

+
_
N

2
+
2
r
_
N

_
e
L
_
N

2
+
2
r
2
+N

4
+
1
r
L

1
2
e
N
_

L +

L

N
2

L
_

1
r
2
+e
L
_
N

2r
+
1
r
2
_
+
_
N

2r
+
1
r
2
_
e
L

1
r
2
= e
N
_

L +

L

N

L
2
_
e
L
_
2
N

r
N

+N

2
_

2
r
2
.
19
Hence, the nonzero components of the Einstein tensor are
G
tt
= e
NL
L

r
+
e
N
r
2
;
G
tr
=

L
r
;
G
rr
=
2
r
2
+
N

r

e
L
r
2
;
G

= r
2
e
L
_

2r
+
1
r
2
+
N

2
+N

4
_
+r
2
e
N
2
_

L +

L

N

L
2
_
;
G

=
1
2
r
2
sin
2

_
e
N
_

L +

L

N

L
2
_
e
L
_

r
+
2
r
2
N

+N

2
_
_
.
6.2.2 Solution using conformal transformation
A more clever way to reduce the amount of computation is to notice that the metric g

is simplied after a conformal

transformation,
g

= r
2
h

= r
2
_
_
_
_
r
2
e
L
0
r
2
e
N
1
0 sin
2

_
_
_
_
.
The metric h

separates into the r t components and the components. We shall rst compute the Ricci tensor
for the metric h

and then determine how R

changes under a conformal transformation. The calculation of R

for
the metric h

is much simpler because h

is a direct (block) sum of two metrics dened on 2-dimensional spaces. It

is clear that R

will also be a direct sum of the corresponding two-dimensional Ricci tensors.

Let us rst compute the Ricci tensor for a diagonal metric
ab
= diag
_
e
A
, e
B
_
in two dimensions; set A A
1
, B A
2
,
and indices a, b, c,... range from 1 to 2. For a two-dimensional metric
ab
, we know that the Ricci tensor is proportional
to
ab
, namely (see Problem 4.4c)
R
ab
=
1
2

ab
R, R
ab
R
ab
= 2 (det
ab
) R
1212
.
So it is sucient to compute say R
11
,
R
11
=
a
11,a

a
1a,1
+
a
ba

b
11

b
1a

a
1b
,
and afterwards we will have
R
ab
=
ab
R
11

11
; R =
ab
R
ab
= 2
R
11

11
.
The necessary Christoel symbols are found as (no implicit summation from now on!)

a
1b
=

c
1
2

ac
(
1c,b
+
bc,1

1b,c
) =
1
2
_
A
1,b

a
1
+
a
b
A
b,1

1
b
e
A1Aa
A
1,a
_
;

1
12
=
1
2
A
,2
;
2
12
=
1
2
B
,1
;

a
11
= A
1,1

a
1

1
2
e
A1Aa
A
1,a
;
1
11
=
1
2
A
,1
;
2
11
=
1
2
e
AB
A
,2
.

a
ba
=
1
2

b
ln (det
cd
) =
1
2
(A
1,b
+A
2,b
) =
1
2
(A +B)
,b
.
Then the component R
11
of the Ricci tensor is
R
11
=
a
11,a

a
1a,1
+
a
ba

b
11

b
1a

a
1b
=
1
11,1
+
2
11,2

1
2
(A+B)
,11
+
1
2
(A +B)
,1

1
11
+
1
2
(A +B)
,2

2
11

1
11

1
11
2
1
12

2
11

2
12

2
12
=
1
2
A
,11

1
2
_
e
AB
A
,2
_
,2

1
2
(A+B)
,11
+
1
2
(A+ B)
,1
1
2
A
,1

1
2
(A +B)
,2
1
2
e
AB
A
,2

1
4
A
,1
A
,1
+ A
,2
1
2
e
AB
A
,2

1
4
B
,1
B
,1
=
1
2
B
,11

1
2
e
AB
A
,22

1
4
A
,2
(A B)
,2
e
AB
+
1
4
B
,1
(AB)
,1
.
We also nd (note the symmetry apparent in this formula; this shows that at least this is not obviously wrong)
R = 2
R
11

11
= e
A
B
,11
e
B
A
,22

1
2
A
,2
(A B)
,2
e
B

1
2
e
A
B
,1
(B A)
,1
.
20
Well, we are not going to nish this calculation here, anyway. But this is roughly how it goes. Let us at
least derive the useful formula below.
The relationship between the curvature tensors under a conformal transformation is found as follows. First we dene
the conformally transformed metric for convenience as follows,
g

= e
2
g

.
Then the Christoel symbols receive a correction which is a tensor B

+B

; B

,
+

,
g

,
.
The Riemann and the Ricci tensors are dened (in Landau-Lifshitz sign convention) by
R

,
+

,
R

= R

,
+

.
The same relation holds for

R

and R

through

(note that these relations do not involve the metric g

explicitly).
Therefore

= B

,
B

,
+B

+B

= B

,
B

,
+B

+B

.
We shall only compute the expression for the Ricci tensor R

. As a preparation, we compute
B

,
N
,
,
where N =

= g

is the number of spacetime dimensions. We shall always raise and lower indices using the original
metric g

. So we compute term by term,

=
_

,
+

,
g

,
_
,
N
,
+N
,

,
+

,
g

,
_
+N
,
_

,
+

,
g

,
_

,
+

,
g

,
_

,
+

,
g

,
)
_

,
+

,
g

,
_
(

,
+

,
g

,
)
= 2
,
g

,
,
g
,

,
N
,
+N
,

,
+

,
g

,
+ 2N
,

,
Ng

,
+g

,
+g

,
(2 +N)
,

,
+ 2g

,
= g

,
,
g

,
Ng

,
+ 2g

,
= (N 2)
_

+ (N 2)
,

,
g

_
(N 2)
,

,
+
,
,
+

,
_
+
_
g

,
+g

,
g
,

.
Now we note that some of the terms can be absorbed into covariant derivatives, and also that the terms in the last
bracket cancel,
_
g

,
+g

,
g
,

= 0,
so the resulting formula can be written more concisely as

= (N 2) [
,

;
] g

_
(N 2)
,

,
+
;
;

.
The modied Ricci scalar is

R = g

= e
2
g

+e
2
g

_
(N 2) [
,

;
] g

_
(N 2)
,

,
+
;
;
_
= e
2
R +e
2
_
(N 2) [
,

;
;
] N
_
(N 2)
,

,
+
;
;
_
= e
2
R (N 2) (N 1)
,

,
2 (N 1)
;
;
.
The Einstein tensor is modied as follows,

=

R

1
2
g

R = R

+ (N 2) [
,

;
] g

_
(N 2)
,

,
+
;
;

1
2
g

[R (N 2) (N 1)
,

,
2 (N 1)
;
;
]
= G

+ (N 2) [
,

;
] +g

_
(N 2) (N 3)
2

,

,
+ (N 2)
;
;
_
.
Note that there is no change in G

in two dimensions (since the Einstein tensor is always equal to zero).

21
6.3 Equations of motion
The equation for the covariant component u
1
(s) is
du
1
ds

1
2
u

r
(g

) = 0.
Using the metric g

= diag
_
f, 1/f, r
2
, r
2
sin
2

_
, where f 1 r
g
/r, and u

=
_

t, r,

,

_
, where d/d, we nd
d
d
_
f
1
r
_

1
2
_
df
dr

t
2

d
dr
_
1
f
_
r
2
2r

2
2r

2
sin
2

_
= 0. (14)
To derive this equation from other equations given in the lecture, we transform in a clever way the expression
0 =
d
d
/ =
d
d
_
f

t
2
f
1
r
2
r
2

2
r
2

2
sin
2

_
.
Namely, we try to separate terms of the form
d
d
(u

) out of the terms of the form

d
d
(u

) in the following way,

d
d
_
u
1
u
1
_
=
d
d
_
g
11
u
1
u
1
_
= 2u
1
d
d
_
g
11
u
1
_
u
1
u
1
d
d
g
11
(no summation!).
For example,
d
d
_
f

t
2
_
= 2

t
d
d
_
f

t
_

t
2
d
d
f, etc.
We nd
0 =
d
d
/ =
d
d
_
f

t
2
f
1
r
2
r
2

2
r
2
sin
2

2
_
= 2

t
d
d
_
f

t
_

t
2
df
d
2 r
d
d
_
f
1
r
_
+ r
2
d
d
f
1
2

d
d
_
r
2

_
+

2
d
d
_
r
2
_
2

d
d
_
r
2
sin
2

_
+

2
d
d
_
r
2
sin
2

_
.
Now we substitute the given equations (2)-(4), and also evaluate derivatives of the metric, e.g. df/d = f

r, so
0 =

t
2
f

r 2 r
d
d
_
f
1
r
_
r
2
f

f
2
r 2

r
2

2
sin cos +

2
2r r +

2
2r sin
2
r + 2

2
r
2

sin cos
= r
_
d
d
_
2f
1
r
_
f

t
2

f
2
r
2
+ 2r

2
+ 2r

2
sin
2

_
.
This is obviously equivalent to Eq. (14).
Note: the reason one of the equations follows from other equations is that the equation u

= const is a consequence
of the four geodesic equations, u

;
= 0, and the fact that g
;
= 0. Therefore, when we consider the four geodesic
equations and the equation u

= const, any one of these ve equations is a consequence of four others.

7 Weak gravitational elds
7.1 Gravitational bending of light
In the lecture it was shown that the trajectory of a light ray in polar coordinates satises the equation
d
2
d
2
_
1
r
_
+
1
r
=
3
2
r
g
r
2
, r
g

2GM
c
2
3km,
where M is the mass of the Sun. Introduce an auxiliary variable v() r
1
and solve the equation
v

+v =
3
2
r
g
v
2
perturbatively, assuming that v is small,
v() = v
0
() +v
1
() +...
The unperturbed solution is
v
0
() =
1
R
0
cos ,
where R
0
is the distance of closest approach to the Sun. Then
v

1
+v
1
=
3
2
r
g
R
2
0
cos
2
=
3
4
r
g
R
2
0
(1 + cos 2) .
22
The solution is found with undetermined coecients,
v
1
() = A+Bcos 2, A =
3
4
r
g
R
2
0
, B =
1
4
r
g
R
2
0
.
The total deection angle is found as =
1

2
, where
1,2
are xed by the condition v() = 0. We nd a quadratic
equation
cos
2

2R
0
r
g
cos 2 = 0, cos =
R
0
r
g

R
2
0
r
2
g
+ 2.
Only the solution with the minus sign is meaningful (cos < 1). Since r
g
R
0
, we may expand this in Taylor series and
nd
cos
r
g
R
0
+O(r
3
g
/R
3
0
).
Therefore, the angle is very close to /2,

1,2
=
_

2
+
_
,
r
g
R
0
, = 2 =
2r
g
R
0
.
This formula can be rewritten as
=
2r
g
/R

R
0
/R

=
_
2r
g
R

_
R

R
0
.
For the Sun we have R

= 6, 96 10
5
km and r
g
= 2, 954 km, therefore
2r
g
/R

= 8, 489 10
6
=
__
8, 489 10
6
360

/2

3600

[arc seconds]
= 1, 751
(see R. Olo Geometrie der Raumzeit, 2nd German edition, page 151).
7.2 Einstein tensor for weak eld
For this problem Chapter 4 from the book Norbert Straumann General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics is
useful. We have g

+h

and
R

,
,
where (...)
,
denotes a derivative

(...). Here one can ask the students about the symmetry of this tensor.
Furthermore

=
1
2

[h
,
+h
,
h
,
] =
1
2
_
h

,
+h

,
h
,

, (15)
where as usual we use the convention that indices are raised or lowered with

; thus e.g. h

. Using Eq. (15)

we have
R

=
1
2
_
h

,
+h

,
h

h
,

,
where =

and h = h

. And for the Ricci scalar we obtain

R =

= h

,
h.
Thus in the linear approximation we have
G

= R

1
2

R =
1
2
_
h

,
+h

,
h

h
,

,
+

h
_
.
Let us introduce a new variable

1
2

h. The traces of two tensors h and are related by = h, thus

h

1
2

. Inserting the last expression for h

in G

, we have
G

=
1
2
_

,
+

,
_
=
=
1
2
_

,
,
+
,
,

_
,
or nally
G

=
1
2
_

,
,
+
,
,

,
,
_
.
23
7.3 Gravitational perturbations I
The metric is written as g

+g

, i.e.
g
00
= 1 + 2, g
0i
= B
,i
+S
i
, g
ij
=
ij
+ 2
ij
+ 2E
,ij
+F
i,j
+F
j,i
+h
ij
, (16)
where S
,i
i
= F
,i
i
= h
,i
ij
= h
ij

ij
= 0, h
ij
= h
ji
. We shall use the formula for G

derived in Problem 7.2. All 3-dimensional

indices are raised and lowered using
ij
, so we can write these indices in any position, as convenient:
g
0
j
= g
0j
= g
j
0
, g
j
i
= g
ij
.
Also note that for any quantity X we have
X
,j
=
_

X X
,j
_
.
We need to write the components of

= g

1
2

h,

h g

,
using the 3+1 decomposition:

h = g

= 2 ( 3E) ,

0
0
= + 3 + E,
0
j
= B
,j
+S
j
=
j
0
=
0j
,

i
j
= ( E)
ij
2E
,ij
F
i,j
F
j,i
h
ij
=
j
i
.
Now we compute

0,

=
0
0

0
j,j
=

+ 3

+
_

E B
_
;

j,

j,
=
0j

j
i,i
=

B
,j

S
j
(( E)
ij
2E
,ij
F
i,j
F
j,i
h
ij
)
,i
=

B
,j

S
j
+ ( + E)
,j
+ F
j
;

,
,
=
_

0,

_
,0
+
_

j,

_
,j
=

+ 3

+
_

E

B
_
+
_

B
,j

S
j
+ ( + E)
,j
+ F
j
_
,j
=

+ 3

+

E 2

B + ( + E) .
Then we compute each component of G

separately:
2G
0
0
= 2
0,
,0

0
0

0
0

,
,
= 2
_

+ 3

+
_

E

B
__

0
( + 3 + E) + ( + 3 + E)

+ 3

+

E
_
+ 2

B ( + E)
= 4;
2G
0
j
=
0,
,j
+
,0
j,

0
j

0
j

,
,
=
_

+ 3

+
_

E B
__
,j

B
,j

S
j
+
_

+

E
_
,j
+

F
j
_

B
,j
+

S
j
_
+ (B
,j
+S
j
) = 4

,j
+ S
j


F
j
,
2G
i
j
=
i,
,j
+
j,
,i

i
j

i
j

,
,
=
_

B
,j

S
j
+ ( + E)
,j
+ F
j
_
,i
+
_

B
,i

S
i
+ ( + E)
,i
+ F
i
_
,j
+(( E)
ij
+ 2E
,ij
+F
i,j
+F
j,i
+h
ij
)
ij
_

+ 3

+

E 2

B + ( + E)
_
= 2
_


B +

E
_
,ij
+

F
i,j
+

F
j,i

S
i,j

S
j,i
+h
ij
2
ij
_
2

+
_


B +

E
__
.
* - the origin of the minus sign here is
,0
j,
=
j,
,0
.
7.4 Gravitational perturbations II
Under an innitesimal transformation x

, the metric changes as

g

,
g

,
= g

,
. (17)
(This can be easily found from the standard formula for the change of coordinages, involving x

/x

.) Now let
us write Eq. (17) in full, using the perturbation variables (16), the covariant components

, and the decomposition

=
_

0
,
i
+
,i
_
. We can write the transformation of g

component by component using the 3+1 decomposition, and

we use the fact that the background metric is diagonal,
g
00
g
00
2
0
,0
; g
0i
g
0i

0
,i

i,0
; g
ij
g
ij

i,j

j,i
.
24
To simplify calculations, we adopt the convention of raising and lowering the spatial indices i, j, ... by the Euclidean
spatial metric
ij
rather than by
ij
. This will get rid of some minus signs. We also denote
0

t
by the overdot. Thus
we have
g
00
g
00
2

0
; g
0i
g
0i

0
,i

i
; g
ij
g
ij

i,j

j,i
.
Substituting the perturbation variables from Eq. (16), we get

0
, (18)
B
,i
+S
i
B
,i
+S
i

0
,i

,i
, (19)
2
ij
+ 2E
,ij
+F
i,j
+F
j,i
+h
ij
2
ij
+ 2E
,ij
+F
i,j
+F
j,i
+h
ij

i,j

j,i
2
,ij
. (20)
Now we need to separate these equations and derive the transformation laws for the individual perturbation variables.
This is easy to do if we perform a Fourier transform of Eqs. (18)-(20) and pass to the Fourier space (where every variable
is a function of a 3-vector k). A vector V
i
is decomposed into scalar and vector components as follows,
V
j
= ik
j
V
(S)
+V
(V )
j
; V
(S)

V
l
k
l
k
2
, V
(V )
j
V
j
ik
j
V
l
k
l
k
2
= V
j
ik
j
V
(S)
. (21)
The idea is rst, to project the given vector V
i
(k) onto the direction of k
i
, and second, to subtract the projection from
V
i
and to obtain the component of V
i
which is transversal to k
i
. The imaginary unit factors are added as coecients at
k
j
for convenience: with these factors, the decomposition (21) translates to real space as
V
j
=
j
V
(S)
+V
(V )
j
.
The same procedure applied to a symmetric tensor T
ij
leads to a decomposition into scalar, vector, and tensor
components. Let us go through this procedure in more detail. First, we subtract the trace and obtain the traceless part
T
(1)
of the tensor T,
T
(1)
ij
T
ij

1
3

ij
T
ll
; T
(1)
ii
= 0.
Note the coecient
1
3
that depends on the number of spatial dimensions (three). Now we project T
(1)
ij
onto k
i
k
j
and
obtain the scalar component T
(S)
proportional to k
i
k
j
and the tensor T
(2)
ij
orthogonal to k
i
k
j
:
T
(1)
ij

_
k
i
k
j
+
1
3

ij
k
2
_
T
(S)
+T
(2)
ij
; T
(S)

3
2
k
i
k
j
T
(1)
ij
k
4
; T
(2)
ij
k
i
k
j
= 0.
Note that T
(2)
ij
is again a trace-free tensor, T
(2)
ii
= 0, due to the subtraction of
1
3
k
2

ij
in the rst term. Finally, we project
T
(2)
ij
onto k
i
and k
j
separately, to obtain a vector part T
(V )
j
such that T
(V )
j
k
j
= 0, and a completely traceless (tensor)
part T
(T)
ij
such that T
(T)
ij
k
j
= 0 and T
(T)
ii
= 0:
T
(2)
ij
= ik
i
T
(V )
j
+ ik
j
T
(V )
i
+T
(T)
ij
; T
(V )
j
i
k
l
k
2
T
(2)
jl
, T
(T)
ij
T
(2)
ij
i
_
k
i
T
(V )
j
+k
j
T
(V )
i
_
.
In real space, the full decomposition is
T
ij
=
1
3
T
ll

ij
+
_

1
3

ij

_
T
(S)
+
i
T
(V )
j
+
j
T
(V )
i
+T
(T)
ij
.
T
(S)

3
2
1

j
_
T
ij

1
3
T
ll

ij
_
; T
(2)
ij

_
T
ij

1
3
T
ll

ij
_

j

1
3

ij

_
T
(S)
;
T
(V )
j
=
1

i
T
(2)
ij
, T
(T)
ij
= T
(2)
ij

i
T
(V )
j

j
T
(V )
i
.
It may be convenient to gather the trace terms (the terms containing
ij
) as one term,
T
ij
= T
(tr)

ij
+
i

j
T
(S)
+
i
T
(V )
j
+
j
T
(V )
i
+T
(T)
ij
, T
(tr)

1
3
T
ll

1
3
T
(S)
.
Note that the perturbation variables , E, F
i
, h
ij
are obtained by this decomposition method, starting from the
symmetric perturbation tensor g
ij
, with slight modications: there are some cosmetic factors of 2 and some minus signs.
Applying the decomposition method to Eqs. (18)-(20), we get the following transformation laws for the perturbation
variables,

0
, B B
0

, S
i
S
i

i
,
E E , , F
i
F
i

i
, h
ij
h
ij
.
25
Remarks:
1. It is clear that one can set F
i
= 0, B = E = 0 with a coordinate transformation. Other components will then show
whether the geometry is really perturbed or its just a coordinate transformation of a at space. In general, there will
remain 6 independent components of perturbations (, , S
i
, h
ij
).
2. These considerations depend rather crucially on the silently made assumption that all the metric perturbations
vanish, g

0, at spatial innity. These boundary conditions are implicitly used when dening the Fourier transforms
necessary for the tensor/vector/scalar decompositions (a Fourier transform is undened without this boundary condition).
Alternatively, one may do without Fourier transforms but then one still needs boundary conditions to solve the relevant
Poisson equations for components. Without boundary conditions, there is no unique decomposition of the form
X
i
= A
,i
+B
i
, A =
1

X
i,i
,
because the function A is dened up to solutions of A = 0. So the tensor/vector/scalar decomposition is actually
undened without a xed assumption about the boundary conditions. The boundary conditions g

0 at spatial
innity is a natural, physically motivated set of boundary conditions. An explicit counterexample where these boundary
conditions are not satised: g

= diag (A, B, B, B), where A ,= 1, B ,= 1 are constants. This metric is at

but one cannot see this by using the perturbation formalism! (The component ,= 0 cannot be removed by a gauge
transformation.) The reason is that this g

is a perturbation of at metric with and that do not decay to zero at

spatial innity. So a coordinate transformation with

decaying to zero cannot bring this metric to

.
8 Gravitational radiation I
8.1 Gauge invariant variables
Using the equations derived in Problem 7.4, it is very easy to verify that D =

B +

E and S
i

F
i
are invariant
under innitesimal changes of coordinates (i.e. invariant under innitesimal gauge transformations).
8.2 Detecting gravitational waves
8.2.1 Using distances between particles
(This solution follows Hobson-Efstathiou-Lasenby [2006], 18.4.)
Consider a plane wave moving in the z direction, (all other components of h

are zero)
h
xx
= h
yy
= A
+
e
i(tz)
, h
xy
= h
yx
= A

e
i(tz)
. (22)
To detect the presence of this gravitational wave, let us imagine a cloud of particles initially at rest at dierent positions.
The 4-vectors describing the particles are u

= (1, 0, 0, 0), so one can easily see that these particles move along geodesics:
u

;
= u

,
+

00
,

=
1
2

(h
,
+h
,
h
,
) ,

00
=
1
2

(h
0,0
+h
0,0
h
00,
) = 0.
Therefore the coordinates x

of each particle remain constant with time. However, the distance between each pair of
particles is determined through the spacelike vector x

(1)
x

(2)
as
L
2
(

+h

) x

and will change with time because of the dependence on h

. Since the only nonzero components of h

are the x, y
components, it is clear that only changing lengths are between particles that have some separation in the x, y directions.
Therefore it is sucient to consider a ring of particles situated in the x y plane. The physically measured distances
between the particles in the ring will change with time, i.e. the ring will experience a deformation.
To visualize the deformation, it is convenient to make a local coordinate transformation (local in the neighborhood
of the ring) such that the metric becomes at, g

(up to second-order terms). The trick that performs

this transformation is the following,
x

= x

+
1
2
h

+
1
2
h

.
It is easy to check that
g

+h

) x

+O(h
2
).
Therefore, x

can be understood as the (approximate) Cartesian coordinates where the length is given by the usual
Pythagorean formula. Now if we compute the shape of the ring in these coordinates, it will be easy to interpret this
shape in a straightforward way.
26
Consider a particle with constant 3-coordinates (x, y, z). After the coordinate transformation, we have
x = x +
1
2
(A
+
x +A

y) e
i(tz)
,
y = y +
1
2
(A

x A
+
y) e
i(tz)
,
z = z.
To visualize the deformation, it is convenient to consider rst the case A
+
,= 0, A

= 0 and then the opposite case.

The deformation of the ring is squeezing in one direction and expansion in the orthogonal direction. It follows that A
+
describes a deformation in the two vertical directions, while A

describes a deformation in the directions at 45

.
Note that the deformations change the shape of the ring in the same way, except for the rotated orientation. This
can be veried by performing a rotation by

4
,
_
x
y
_

2
_
1 1
1 1
__
x
y
_
,
and then it is straightforward to see that this will exchange A
+
and A

.
8.2.2 Using geodesic deviation equation
PLEASE NOTE: The commonly found arguments that use the geodesic deviation equation are suspect because the
geodesic deviation equation uses coordinates

rather than gauge-invariant quantities. A cloud of particles at rest in

the gravitational eld h

described by Eq. (22) will stay indenitely at rest in the coordinate system (

= const)
even though the distances between particles will change with time. See arxiv:gr-qc/0605033 for nice explanations. The
solution given above is simple and straightforward. The argument using the geodesic deviation (see Carroll, Chapter 6,
p. 152-154) goes like this:
The geodesic deviation equation can be simplied for a deviation vector S

corresponding to nonrelativistic (almost

stationary) particles moving with 4-velocity approximately equal to (1, 0, 0, 0),
d
2
S

dt
2
= R

00
S

.
The Riemann tensor to rst order in h can be expressed as
R

00
=

h

(note that h
0
= 0). Therefore, the geodesic deviation equation becomes

=

h

S
x
=
2
(h
xx
S
x
+h
xy
S
y
) =
2
(A
+
S
x
+A

S
y
) e
i(tz)
,

S
y
=
2
(h
yx
S
x
+h
yy
S
y
) =
2
(A

S
x
A
+
S
y
) e
i(tz)
,
and there is no change in the z direction.
8.3 Poisson equation
The general solution of the Poisson equation,
= 4,
with boundary conditions 0 at innity, is easy to nd using the Fourier transform:
k
2
(k) = 4(k),
(x) =
_
d
3
k
(2)
3
e
ikx
4(k)
k
2
=
_
d
3
k
(2)
3
e
ikx
4
k
2
_
d
3
ye
iky
(y) =
_
d
3
y (y)G(x y),
where G(x) is the Greens function,
G(x) =
_
d
3
k
(2)
3
e
ikx
4
k
2
=
1

_

0
dk
_

0
d sin e
ik|x| cos
=
2
[x[
_

0
dk
k
sinkx =
1
[x[
.
Here we used the known integral
_

0
sinz
z
dz =
1
2
_
+

sin z
z
dz =
1
2
.
Therefore
(x) =
_
d
3
y
[x y[
(y). (23)
27
One can denote this integral more concisely,
= 4
1

,
where the operator
1

is just a shorthand notation for the integral in Eq. (23).

Note that the function must fall o suciently rapidly as [x[ or else the integral (23) will not converge. It is
sucient that [(x)[ [x[
2
at large [x[ (where > 0).
8.4 Metric perturbations 1
An arbitrary 3-vector X
i
(such as T
0
i
) is decomposed into scalar and vector parts as follows,
X
i
= a
,i
+b
i
, b
i,i
= 0.
To determine an explicit expression for a, let us compute the divergence of X
i
,
X
i,i
= a
,ii
= a.
Therefore
a(x) =
1
4
_
d
3
y
[x y[
X
i,i
(y).
One can write more concisely
a =
1

X
i,i
.
8.5 Metric perturbations 2
The energy-momentum tensor T

is decomposed as
T
0
i
=
,i
+
i
,
1

T
0
k,k
,
i
T
0
i

_
1

T
0
k,k
_
,i
;
T
i
k
=
ik
+
,ik
+
i,k
+
k,i
+T
(T)i
k
,

i,i
=
i,i
= 0, T
(T)i
i
= 0, T
(T)i
k,i
= 0.
We need to verify that the equation

1
16G
(

S
i

F
i
) =
i
, (24)
which represents the vector part of the spatial Einstein equation (here
i
is the vector part of the spatial T
ij
), also follows
from the conservation of T

and from the other Einstein equations.

To calculate the components , of the EMT, we compute
T
i
i
= + 3,
T
i
k,i
=
,k
+
,k
+
k
,
T
i
k,ik
= + .
Now we solve this system of equations and nd
=
1
2
_
T
i
i

1

T
i
k,ik
_
, =
3
2
1

T
i
k,ik

1
2
T
i
i
,

j
=
1

T
i
j,i

_
1

T
i
k,ik
_
,j
,
(T)
T
i
k
= T
i
k

i
k

,ik

i,k

k,i
.
Note that the operator
1

2
applied to a function f(x) is dened only if the function f has a suciently fast decay at
[x[ . It is sucient that [f(x)[ [x[
3
with > 0 at large [x[. This is a faster decay than that required by the
operator
1

.
The Einstein equations are
2 = 8GT
0
0
,
2

,i
+
1
2

S
i
= 8GT
0
i
= 8G(
,i
+
i
) ,
D
,ij

ij
_
D + 2

1
2
_

S
i,j
+

S
j,i
_
+
1
2
h
ij
= 8GT
i
j
= 8G
_

ik
+
,ik
+
i,k
+
k,i
+T
(T)i
k
_
,
where we have denoted for brevity

S
i
S
i

F
i
, D +B

E,
28
which are gauge-invariant variables. In the 3+1 decomposition, the Einstein equations become
= 4GT
0
0
, (25)

= 4G, (26)

S
i
= 16G
i
, (27)
D = 8G, (28)
D + 2

= 8G, (29)

S
i
= 16G
i
, (30)
h
ij
= 16GT
(T)i
j
. (31)
The conservation law of the EMT in 3+1 decomposition looks like this,
T
0
0,0
+T
j
0,j
= 0, T
0
i,0
+T
j
i,j
= 0. (32)
This gives

T
0
0
= ,
,i
+

i
+
,i
+
,i
+
i
= 0,
therefore

T
0
0
= , + + = 0,

i
+
i
= 0. (33)
Then it is easy to see that Eqs. (26), (29), and (30) are consequences of Eqs. (25), (27), (28), and the conservation
laws (33). In particular,

S
i
=
t
1

16G
i
=
1

16G
i
= 16G
i
.
9 Gravitational radiation II
9.1 Projection of the matter tensor
a) First note that P
ab
is a projector,
P
ab
P
bc
= P
ac
,
and its image has dimension 2, that is, the trace of P
ab
is 2,
P
ii
= 3 n
i
n
i
= 2.
Therefore, for any X
ab
we have
(T)
X
ii
= P
ia
X
ab
P
bi

1
2
P
ii
P
ab
X
ab
= P
ab
X
ab

1
2
2P
ab
X
ab
= 0.
b) We compute
(T)
X
ik,i
=
_
P
ia
X
ab
P
bk

1
2
P
ik
P
ab
X
ab
_
,i
=
_
P
ia
P
bk

1
2
P
ik
P
ab
_
,i
X
ab
+
_
P
ia
P
bk

1
2
P
ik
P
ab
_
X
ab,i
. (34)
Note that the projection kills any component proportional to R
i
because P
ia
R
i
= 0. At the same time, X
ab,i
is propor-
tional to R
i
because
X
ab,i
=
_
X(t [

R[)
_
,i
=
R
i
R
X

.
Therefore the second term in Eq. (34) vanishes:
_
P
ia
P
bk

1
2
P
ik
P
ab
_
R
i
= 0.
So only the rst term remains,
(T)
X
ik,i
=
_
P
ia
P
bk

1
2
P
ik
P
ab
_
,i
X
ab
.
29
However, this term contains derivatives of P
ab
, which are also sometimes proportional to R
i
. We compute
P
ik,a
= n
i,a
n
k
n
i
n
k,a
; n
i,a
=
_
R
i
R
_
,a
=
R
i,a
R

R
i
R
2
[R[
,a
=

ia
R

R
i
R
a
R
3
=
1
R
P
ia
,
P
ik,a
=
1
R
(P
ai
n
k
+P
ak
n
i
) , P
ik,i
=
2
R
n
k
, (note that P
ak
n
k
= 0)
_
P
ia
P
bk

1
2
P
ik
P
ab
_
,i
= P
ia,i
P
bk

1
2
P
ik,i
P
ab
+P
ia
P
bk,i

1
2
P
ik
P
ab,i
=
2
R
n
a
P
bk
+
1
R
n
k
P
ab

1
R
P
ia
(P
bi
n
k
+P
ik
n
b
) +
1
2R
P
ik
(P
ai
n
b
+P
bi
n
a
)
=
1
R
_
2n
a
P
bk
+n
k
P
ab
P
ab
n
k
P
ak
n
b
+
1
2
P
ak
n
b
+
1
2
P
bk
n
a
_
=
1
R
_
3
2
P
bk
n
a
+
1
2
P
ak
n
b
_
.
This is higher-order in 1/[

R[ than P
ab
, as required.
9.2 Matter sources
The question is to verify the following property,
(T)
X
ik
=
(T)
Q
ik
,
where
Q
ik
= X
ik

_
1
3

ik
r
2
T
0
0
d
3
r.
It is easy to see that X
ik
diers from Q
ik
only by a term of the form A(t, R)
ij
. The transverse-traceless part of
ij
is
zero,
_
P
ia
P
bk

1
2
P
ik
P
ab
_

ab
= 0.
Therefore the transverse-traceless parts of X
ik
and Q
ik
are the same.
9.3 Energy-momentum tensor of gravitational waves
See Hobson-Efstathiou-Lasenby [2006], 17.11.
We need to compute the second-order terms in the Einstein tensor. The idea is to separate the second-order terms
already in the Ricci tensor. We will also try to simplify things by using the fact that h

is purely transverse-traceless;
h
0
= 0, h
ii
= 0, h
ik,i
= 0. It follows that

= 0, h

,
= 0.
Also, it is given that the EMT of matter vanishes, T

= 0, which we will use below.

First we decompose the metric,
g

+h

, g

;
note that now indices are always raised and lowered using

. We need to compute the Ricci tensor to second order.

The Christoel symbol up to second order is

=
1
2
_

_
(h
,
+h
,
h
,
) =
(1)

+
(2)

(1)

=
1
2

(h
,
+h
,
h
,
) ,

(2)

=
1
2
h

(h
,
+h
,
h
,
) .
The Ricci tensor is
R

,
+

= R
(1)

+R
(2)

,
R
(1)

=
(1)
,

(1)
,
,
R
(2)

=
(2)
,

(2)
,
+
(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

.
Let us now evaluate these expressions and simplify as much as possible, as early as possible:

(1)

=
1
2

h
,
=
1
2
_

_
,
= 0,
R
(1)

=
(1)
,

(1)
,
=
1
2

(h
,
+h
,
h
,
) =
1
2
h

,
30
because of the transverse traceless property of h

. Now, since R
(1)

is found from the rst-order Einstein equation

R
(1)

1
2

R
(1)
= 8GT

,
and it is given that T

= 0. Hence, we have h

= 0.
Let us now evaluate derivatives of the second-order terms in the Christoel symbols:

(2)

=
1
2
h

(h
,
+h
,
h
,
) =
1
2
h

h
,
,

(2)
,
=
1
2
h

h
,
+
1
2
h

,
h
,
,

(2)
,
=
1
2
h

(h
,
+h
,
h
,
)
(in the last line we used h

,
= 0). Finally, we tackle the term
(1)

(1)

. In this term, it helps to write

(1)

=
1
2
_
h

,
+h

,
h
,

_
,
where again the indices are raised via

since we only need this term to rst order. Then we can simplify this expression
by grouping together terms where , appear in similar positions:
4
(1)

(1)

=
_
h

,
+h

,
h
,

_
_
h

,
+h

,
h
,

_
(expand brackets) = h

,
h

,
+h

,
h

,
h

,
h
,

+h

,
h

,
+h

,
h

,
h

,
h
,

h
,

,
h
,

,
+h
,

h
,

(move, rename , ) = h
,

h
,

+h
,
h

,
h

,
h
,

+h

,
h
,
+h

,
h
,
h

,
h
,
h

,
h
,

h
,
h

,
+h
,

h
,

(gather terms) = 2h
,

h
,

+ (h
,
h
,
) h

,
2h

,
h
,

+h

,
(h
,
h
,
) +h

,
h
,
(symmetry of h

) = h
,
h

,
+ 2h
,

h
,

2h

,
h
,

.
Finally, we put together the expression for R
(2)

:
R
(2)

=
1
2
h

(h
,
h
,
+h
,
+h
,
) +
1
2
h

,
h
,

1
4
_
h
,
h

,
+ 2h
,

h
,

2h

,
h
,

_
=
1
2
h

(h
,
h
,
+h
,
+h
,
) +
1
4
h

,
h
,
+
1
2
_
h
,

,
h
,

h
,

_
. (35)
The Ricci scalar is
R
(2)
=

R
(2)

=
1
2
h

+
1
4
h

,
h
,

+
1
2
_
h
,

,
h
,
h
,
_
=
3
4
h
,
h
,

1
2
h
,
h
,
, (36)
where we again used the transverse traceless property of h

and also h

= 0. Note that the rst-order Ricci scalar

is zero, R
(1)
= 0, since T

= 0. For this reason we may use

in Eq. (36), otherwise we would have to write

( +h)
_
R
(1)
+R
(2)
_
and pick up a second-order term hR
(1)
.
Again, since R
(1)
= 0, we may use

rather than g

to compute the Einstein tensor:

G
(2)

= R
(2)

1
2

R
(2)
.
We do not write the answer explicitly since it is a combination of Eqs. (35) and (36).
Now let us perform an averaging of the quantity G
(2)

over both space and time. In other words, we integrate G

(2)

over a 4-dimensional region such that h

= 0 and h
,
= 0 on the boundary of that region. Then

(...)) = 0 and so
we may integrate by parts, for example
A

B
,
) = A
,
B

) ,
as long as A

contains rst powers of h

or h
,
, so that boundary terms vanish. Then, for example,

h
,
_
=

,
h
,
_
, (37)

h
,
_
=
_
h

,
h
,
_
= 0,
h
,

h
,
) = h

) = 0,
by h

= 0 and by the transverse traceless property of h

. Many terms cancel in this way; for instance,

R
(2)
_
= 0.
Finally, we get
_
G
(2)

_
=
_
1
2
h

(h
,
h
,
+h
,
+h
,
) +
1
4
h

,
h
,
+
1
2
_
h
,

,
h
,

h
,

_
_
=
1
2

h
,
_
+
1
4

,
h
,
_
=
1
4

,
h
,
_
using Eq. (37). Finally, we obtain the required equation,
(GW)
T

=
1
8G
_
G
(2)

_
=
1
32G

,
h
,
_
=
1
32G

h
ij
,
h
ij,
_
.
31
9.4 Power of emitted radiation
To derive the relations
_
n
l
n
m
d
4
=
1
3

lm
,
_
n
l
n
m
n
k
n
r
d
4
=
1
15
(
lm

kr
+
lk

mr
+
lk

mr
),
let us consider the generating function
g

(q
l
)
_
d
4
exp
_
in
l
q
l

,
which is a function of a vector argument q
l
. After computing g

(q
l
) it will be easy to obtain integrals such as the above:
_
n
l
n
m
d
4
= i

q
l
i

q
m
g

(q
j
)

qj=0
, etc.
The computation is easy if we introduce spherical coordinates with the z axis parallel to the vector q
l
, then n
l
q
l
= [q[ cos ,
where [q[

q
l
q
l
, and then we have
g

(q
l
) =
1
4
_
2
0
d
_

0
d sin exp [i [q[ cos ] =
1
4
2
2i sin [q[
i [q[
=
sin [q[
[q[
= 1
1
3!
q
l
q
l
+
1
5!
(q
l
q
l
)
2

1
7!
(q
l
q
l
)
3
+...
We have used the Taylor expansion for convenience of evaluating derivatives at [q[ = 0. These derivatives can be found
as follows,
g

q
l
=
2
3!
q
l
+
4
5!
q
l
[q[
2
... =
_

1
3
+
1
30
[q[
2
_
q
l
,

2
g

q
k
q
l
=
_

1
3
+
1
30
[q[
2
_

kl
+
1
15
q
l
q
k
,

3
g

q
j
q
k
q
l
=
1
15
(q
j

kl
+q
k

jl
+q
l

jk
) ,

4
g

q
j
q
k
q
l
q
m
=
1
15
(
jm

kl
+
km

jl
+
lm

jk
) .
Now we compute the intensity of radiation. The ux of radiation in the direction n
k
is
(GW)
T
0k
n
k
, and we need to
integrate this ux through a sphere of radius R:
dE
dt
= R
2
_
d
2

(GW)
T
0k
n
k
=
R
2
32G
_
d
2

_
h
ij
,0
h
ij,k
_
n
k
.
The perturbation h
ij
is found from the Einstein equation. It was derived in the lecture that, in the leading order in 1/R,
we have
h
ij
= 2G
(TT)

Q
ij
(t [

R[)
[

R[
,
(TT)
Q
ij

_
P
ai
P
bj

1
2
P
ab
P
ij
_
Q
ab
.
The projection tensor P
ij
is dened in Problem 9.1. The tensor Q
ij
is dened by
Q
ij
(t)
_
d
3
x
_
x
i
x
j

1
3
[x[
2

ij
_
T
00
(x, t)
and is by denition trace-free, Q
ii
= 0. Thus we have
h
ij,k
=
16G
R
(TT)

Q
ij
(t [R[)
R
k
R
,
dE
dt
=
G
8
_
d
2

_
(TT)
...
Q
ij
(TT)
...
Q
ij
_
.
It remains to compute the average over the sphere of
(TT)
...
Q
ij
(TT)
...
Q
ij
.
32
Consider any symmetric, trace-free tensor A
ij
instead of
...
Q
ij
; the transverse-traceless part of A
ij
is dened by
(TT)
A
ij

_
P
ai
P
bj

1
2
P
ab
P
ij
_
A
ab
.
Since A
ii
= 0, we have A
ab
P
ab
= A
ab
n
a
n
b
and so
(TT)
A
ij
(TT)
A
ij
=
_
P
ai
P
bj

1
2
P
ab
P
ij
__
P
ci
P
dj

1
2
P
cd
P
ij
_
A
ab
A
cd
=
_
P
ac
P
bd

1
2
P
ab
P
cd
_
A
ab
A
cd
=
_
P
ac
P
bd

1
2
n
a
n
b
n
c
n
d
_
A
ab
A
cd
= A
ab
A
ab
2A
ac
A
bc
n
a
n
b
+
1
2
A
ab
A
cd
n
a
n
b
n
c
n
d
.
After integration over the sphere, according to formulas derived above, we have (again note that
ab
A
ab
= 0 and A
ab
=
A
ba
)
1
4
_
d
2
A
ac
A
bc
n
a
n
b
=
1
3
A
ac
A
bc

ab
=
1
3
A
ab
A
ab
,
1
4
_
d
2
A
ab
A
cd
n
a
n
b
n
c
n
d
=
1
15
A
ab
A
cd
(
ab

cd
+
ac

bd
+
ad

bc
) =
2
15
A
ab
A
ab
,
and thus
1
4
_
d
2

(TT)
A
ij
(TT)
A
ij
= A
ab
A
ab
_
1
2
3
+
1
2
2
15
_
=
2
5
A
ab
A
ab
.
Finally, substituting
...
Q
ij
instead of A
ij
, we nd
dE
dt
=
G
2
1
4
_
d
2

_
(TT)
...
Q
ij
(TT)
...
Q
ij
_
=
G
5
...
Q
ij
...
Q
ij
_
. (38)
The angular brackets ) indicate that we must perform an averaging over spacetime domains. This means, for us, that we
need to average over time (since Q
ij
is a function only of time). Averaging is performed over timescales larger than the
typical timescale of change in the source. For instance, if the source is a rotating body, then averaging must be performed
over several periods of rotation.
10 Derivation: gravitational waves in at spacetime
The metric is assumed to be of the form
g

+h

,
where

= diag(1, 1, 1, 1) is the Minkowski metric for at space and h

is a small perturbation which is assumed

to fall o to zero quickly at innity. We start with a 3+1 decomposition of the metric perturbation h

and compute
the Einstein tensor (see Problems 7.2, 7.3, 7.4) in terms of the perturbation variables , , etc. We also decompose the
matter energy-momentum tensor T

and obtain the Einstein equations separately for each component (8.5). The result
is that (a) the variables E, B, F
i
can be set to zero by choosing a coordinate system; (b) if there is no matter (vacuum)
the scalar and vector components of the metric perturbation are equal to zero; (c) the tensor component h
ij
satises the
wave equation (31).
Solutions of the wave equation in four dimensions with retarded boundary condition can be written using the known
Greens function. For instance, if
f(t, r) = A(t, r) f(t, R) =
1
4
_
d
3
r
A(t [r R[ , r)
[r R[
.
We will use this formula for f
(T)
h
ij
and A 16G
(T)
T
i
j
. Now, we are interested in describing the radiation sent far
away by a matter distribution, so we take the limit [R[ [r[, and then we can approximately set
(T)
h
ij

4G
[R[
_
d
3
r
(T)
T
i
j
(t [r R[ , r).
Now we use a trick (See Hobson-Efstathiou-Lasenby, 17.9) to express the components T
j
i
through T
0
0
; it is much easier
to compute with T
0
0
because this is just the energy density of matter. Consider rst the tensor T
i
j
rather than its
transverse-traceless part
(T)
T
i
j
. The trick is to write the integral (out of sheer luck)
_
d
3
r
a

b
_
r
i
r
j
_
T
ab
= 2
_
d
3
r T
ij
.
33
Then we integrate by parts and use the conservation laws (32),
T
i
j,i
= T
0
j,0
, T
i
j,ij
= T
0
j,0j
= T
0
0,00


T
0
0
; T
ij
,ij
=

T
0
0
.
2
_
d
3
r T
ij
=
_
d
3
r T
ab
,ab
r
i
r
j
=
_
d
3
r r
i
r
j

T
0
0
.
Now, we need to obtain the transverse-traceless part of the tensor. In principle, we have the formulas for this (see
Problem 8.5). But they are very complicated. A shortcut is to notice that the projection operator P
ab
does the job
(Problems 9.1 and 9.2), at least in the leading order in 1/[R[. (We are only interested in everything to leading order in
1/ [R[ since all smaller terms will not give any ux of radiated energy.) The result is
(T)
h
ik
(R, t) =
2G
[R[
(TT)

Q
ik
(t [R[),
Q
ik
(t)
_
d
3
r T
0
0
(r, t)
_
r
i
r
k

1
3
r
2

ik
_
. (39)
The tensor Q
ik
is the quadrupole moment of energy distribution; it is a traceless and symmetric tensor. In principle, we
could just use the integral
_
d
3
r T
0
0
(r, t)r
i
r
k
, (40)
because the transverse-traceless parts of (40) and of Q
ik
are the same, but it is more convenient to use Q
ik
.
Since we found the tensor perturbation
(T)
h
ij
, now we would like to compute the energy radiated in the gravitational
waves. For this we need the energy-momentum tensor of gravitational waves. This is a rather nontrivial object, since
in general the gravitational eld does not have any energy-momentum tensor. In the case of gravitational waves in
at background spacetime, one can dene some quantity
(GW)
T

which looks like the energy-momentum tensor of

gravitational waves (but actually is not even a generally covariant tensor). We will compute this quantity below. This
quantity is useful because it gives the correct value of the energy after one integrates over a large region of spacetime.
The real justication for using this procedure is complicated and is beyond the scope of this introductory course of
General Relativity. We will only show a heuristic justication, which is the following. Gravitation is sensitive to every
kind of energy, because the energy-momentum tensor acts as a source for gravity (it is on the right-hand side of the
Einstein equation). So gravitation should be also sensitive to the energy in gravitational waves. One expects that the
energy-momentum tensor for gravitational waves,
(GW)
T

(if we know how to compute it), will act as an additional

source for gravity, like every other energy-momentum tensor for other kinds of matter. We will guess the formula for
(GW)
T

as follows. We can write the Einstein equation and expand it in powers of the perturbation h

:
G

+h

] = G
(1)

[h] +G
(2)

[h] +... = 8GT

. (41)
Here G
(1)
is the rst-order Einstein tensor, G
(2)
is the second-order etc. First we solve only to rst-order in h (this is
what we have been doing so far) and then we will get an approximate solution h
(1)

:
G
(1)

[h
(1)
] = 8GT

. (42)
This solution disregards the eect of gravitational waves and only takes into account the eect of matter T

. We can
try to get a more precise solution by using the second-order terms in Eq. (41). Then we will get a correction h
(2)
to the
solution; the solution g = +h
(1)
+h
(2)
will be more precise. From Eq. (41) we nd
G
(1)

[h
(1)
+h
(2)
] +G
(2)

[h
(1)
] = 8GT

.
Now this is similar to Eq. (42), but it looks as if there is an additional term in the energy-momentum tensor, which we
may rewrite as
G
(1)

[h
(1)
+h
(2)
] = 8G
_
T

+
(GW)
T

_
,
(GW)
T

1
8G
G
(2)

[h
(1)
].
This motivates us to say that the EMT for gravitational waves is given by this formula. But of course this is not a real
derivation because this does not show why the quantity
(GW)
T

has anything to do with the energy carried by waves.

The second-order terms G
(2)

are computed in Problem 9.3. The result is used to compute the power radiated in
gravitational waves (Problem 9.4). Note that the calculation of G
(2)

uses averaging over spacetime in an essential way.

Thus, the result is an averaged power radiated during a long timemuch longer than the typical time scale of change
in the sourcesand averaged over large distances, much larger than the typical length scale of the sources. This kind of
averaging is assumed in Eq. (38). It remains unclear exactly how one performs averaging over space and time.
One can use the formula (38) to compute the gravitational radiation emitted by nonrelativistic matter far away from
those places where the matter is contained. The distribution of the energy density, T
0
0
(r, t), should be given. Then one
computes the tensor Q
ij
according to Eq. (39), by integrating over space where the matter is contained. Finally, one
computes the third derivative
...
Q
ij
, the trace, and averages over long time, as indicated in Eq. (38). If we want to insert
factors of c, we replace G by Gc
9
.
34
WiSe06 T VI General Relativity Problem Sheet 1
http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~serge/WS06-T6/
1 Coordinates and 1-forms
1.1 Invertible transformations
Under what conditions is a coordinate transformation

(x

) invertible in a neighborhood of some point

x

?
1.2 Examples of coordinate transformations
The following coordinate transformations are given, mapping the standard Euclidean coordinates (x, y) or
(x, y, z) into new coordinates.
1. In a two-dimensional plane, (x, y) (u, v), where < u, v < +:
x = u + uv
2
+
1
3
u
3
,
y = v + vu
2
+
1
3
v
3
.
2. In a three-dimensional space, (x, y, z) (r, , ), where < r < +, 0 < +, 0 < 2:
x = r sinh cos ,
y = r sinh sin,
z = r cosh.
3. In a three-dimensional space, (x, y, z) (r, , ), where 0 r < +, 0 , 0 < 2:
x = r sin cos ,
y = r sin sin ,
z = r cos .
The following questions must be answered in all three cases:
(a) Find the subdomain covered by the new coordinates. Hint: Consider e.g. the range of x at constant
value of y.
(b) Find the points where the new coordinates do not specify a one-to-one invertible transformation (sin-
gular points).
(c) If singular points exist, give a geometric interpretation.
1.3 Basis in tangent space
Prove that the vectors e

=

x

are linearly independent.

1.4 Differentials of functions as 1-forms
If f(x

) is a function of coordinates x

, then one denes the 1-form df (called the differential of the function
f) as
df

f
x

dx

. (1)
Compute d(x), d(x
2
), d(xy), d(x + y). Compute the 1-forms df, dg, dh, where the functions f, g, h are dened
as follows,
f(x, y, z) =4x
2
y + x
3
z,
g(x, y) =3

x
2
+ y
2
,
h(x, y) =arctan(x + y) + arctan(x y)
+ arctan
2x
x
2
y
2
1
.
1.5 Basis in cotangent space
Show that the 1-forms dx
1
, ..., dx
n
comprise a basis in the space of 1-forms at any point M. Show that
< dx

,

x

>=

.
1.6 Linearly independent 1-forms
Check whether the following sets of 1-forms are linearly independent at each point of the 2-dimensional or the
3-dimensional space respectively. If not, determine the points where these sets are linearly dependent.
1. Two 1-forms d(e
x
cos y), d(e
x
sin y).
2. Two 1-forms (1 + y)dx 2xydy, 8dx.
3. Three 1-forms dx + dy, dx + dz, dy + dz.
4. Three 1-forms dx dy, dy dz, dz dx.
1.7 Transformation law for 1-forms
Derive the transformation law for 1-forms,
d x

=
x

dx

, (2)
under a coordinate transformation x

= x

(x

).
1.8 Examples of transformations
Consider the coordinate transformation (x, y) (u, v) dened in Problem 1.2(1). Transform the following
1-form,
= d
1
x + y
,
into the coordinates (u, v) in two ways:
(a) By a direct substitution of the new coordinates.
(b) By using the transformation law (2).
2
WiSe06 T VI General Relativity Supplemental Problem Sheet 1
http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~serge/WS06-T6/
2D surfaces embedded in 3D Euclidean space
1A Tangent plane
Consider the surface given by z = hexp

1
2
2
(x
2
+ y
2
)

. If gravity acts in the negative z-direction, at what

points will a ball rolling along this surface experience the greatest acceleration? Find the tangent plane at one
of these points.
1B Induced metric
Find the metric for the surface given parametrically by
x = a sin
2
cos ,
y = a sin
2
sin,
z = a cos sin,
where, as usual, [0, ) and [0, 2). Is the metric well dened at = 0? Do you think the surface is well
dened there?
1C Embedding waves
1. Sketch the surface given by
x =
cos v

2 sin u
,
y =
sin v

2 sin u
,
z =
cos u

2 sin u
,
where u, v [0, 2). (Hint: Consider the intersection of the surface with the plane y = 0. What happens
for general v?)
2. Find the normal vector and the tangent plane to this surface at point (u, v).
3. Determine the induced metric on the surface. Then consider the 2D vector V
a
= (cos v, sin v), i.e.
V = cos v

v
+ sinv

u
,
dened within the surface. Is V
a
a unit vector? What are the 3D Euclidean components of the vector V
in the 3D space? Show that the 3D components of the vector V everywhere lie in the tangent plane to
the surface.
WiSe06 T VI General Relativity Problem Sheet 2
http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~serge/WS06-T6/
2 Tensors
2.1 Denition of tensor product
If
1
and
2
are 1-forms, their tensor product
1

2
is dened as a function on pairs of vectors:
(
1

2
)(v
1
, v
2
) =
1
, v
1

2
, v
2
. (1)
Let
1
= dx + 2ydy,
2
= 2dy be 1-forms on a 2-dimensional space and v
1
= 3/x, v
2
= x(/x + /y)
be vector elds (also dened in this 2-dimensional space). Just for this problem, let us denote T
1

2
.
(a) Compute T(v
1
, v
1
).
(b) Compute T(v
1
, v
2
).
(c) Show that
T(a + b, u) = T(a, u) + T(b, u), (2)
where a, b, u are vectors and is a number). The same property holds for the second argument of T. Such
functions T are called bilinear.
(d) Show that all bilinear functions of pairs of 2-dimensional vectors belong to a vector space of such
functions. Show that the tensor products dx dx, dx dy, dy dx, dy dy form a basis in that space. (That
space is called the space of tensors of rank 0 + 2.)
2.2 General tensors
(a) A general tensor of rank r + s is dened as a multilinear function on sets of r 1-forms f
j
and s vectors v
j
(multilinear means linear in every argument). An example of a tensor of rank r + s is a tensor product of r
vectors e
1
, ..., e
r
, and s 1-forms
1
, ...,
s
, denoted by e
1
... e
r

1
...
s
. This tensor is a function
that acts on a set of r 1-forms f
j
and s vectors v
j
via the formula
e
1
... e
r

1
...
s
(f
1
, ..., f
r
, v
1
, ..., v
s
)
= f
1
, e
1
... f
r
, e
r

1
, v
1
...
s
, v
s
.
(This is a generalization of Eq. (1) to tensors of rank r +s.) Show that this function is linear in every argument.
Such functions are called r + s-linear functions. Show that all r + s-linear functions form a vector space. This
vector space is called the space of tensors of rank r + s.
(b) Let e
j
, j = 1, ..., N, and
j
, j = 1, ..., N are bases in the space of vectors and in the space of 1-forms
respectively (both spaces have dimension N). Show that the set of tensors
e
1
... e
r

1
...
s
(3)
form a basis in the space of r + s-tensors (where
j
and
j
exhaust all possible combinations of indices). Note
that this set contains n
r+s
basis tensors.
2.3 Example
(a) Let T be a bilinear function of two vectors with vector values, i.e. T(v
1
, v
2
) is a vector if v
1
, v
2
are vectors.
Give a simple example of such T as a tensor and determine its rank.
(b) A particular example of such a tensor T in 3-dimensional Euclidean space is the following function,
T(v
1
, v
2
) = 2v
1
v
2
v
1
(n v
2
), (4)
where n is a xed vector. Show that the function T is bilinear in v
1
, v
2
. Determine the components T

of the
tensor T in an orthogonal basis where the vector n has the components n

(n
1
, n
2
, n
3
).
1
2.4 Transformation law
Derive the transformation law for the components T
1...r
1...s
of a tensor of rank r + s.
2.5 Contractions of tensor indices
(a) Show that the results of addition, multiplication by scalar, tensor multiplication, and index contraction of
tensors are again tensors. Use the denition of tensor from Problem 2.2.
(b) Show that a contraction of indices in the same position (e.g. lower indices with lower indices, T

) does
not generally yield a tensor.
(c) Consider the tensor T

dened in Problem 2.3(b) and compute the contraction T

. Is the result a
tensor? If so, determine its rank.
2.6 Invariance of the interval
Show that the spacetime interval ds
2
g

dx

dx

is invariant under coordinate transformations x

if
g

are components of a tensor transforming according to the tensor transformation law

g

=
x

. (5)
2.7 Correspondence between vectors and 1-forms
For a given metric g

, each vector v has a corresponding 1-form which we shall denote

v
. This 1-form is
dened by its action on an arbitrary vector x as follows,

v
, x = v x, (6)
where the scalar product v x is dened through the metric g

. Show that the components of the 1-form

v
in the basis dx

are related to the components of the vector v in the basis /x

by

= g

. (7)
2.8 Examples of spaces with a metric
(a) Consider the usual, Euclidean 3-dimensional space with the metric
g(v
1
, v
2
) = v
1
v
2
(n v
1
) (n v
2
), (8)
where v
1
v
2
is the usual scalar product, ab is the cross product, and n is a xed vector with components n

.
Compute the components of the tensor g

. For which vectors n is the metric g nondegenerate (i.e. det g

= 0)?
(b) Answer the same questions for the 2-dimensional Euclidean space with the metric
g(v
1
, v
2
) = 3v
1
v
2
+ (n v
1
)(n v
2
). (9)
Note that the cross product is undened in the 2-dimensional space.
(c)* Answer the same questions for the metric (9) now dened in an r-dimensional Euclidean space, r 3.
(d)* Consider a 2-dimensional surface embedded in the 3-dimensional Euclidean space,
x = Rcoshu cos v, (10)
y = Rcoshu sin v, (11)
z = Rsinh u. (12)
Determine the 2-dimensional metric g

in the basis du, dv.

2
WiSe06 T VI General Relativity Supplemental Problem
Sheet 2
http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~serge/WS06-T6/
Calculations with tensor indices
1A Vector equations
In the following equations, the vector x

is unknown and all other quantities are known. The

symbol

denotes the completely antisymmetric tensor. Determine the unknown vector x

from the given data. In every case, assume the generic choice of data. This means that every
given scalar, vector and tensor is nonzero (k, A

, B

, ...), there are no accidental cancellations

or linear dependence between given vectors, matrices are nondegenerate, etc.
(a) kx

= B

(3-dimensional vectors). The assumption of the generic case is

k = 0 and A

and B

linearly independent.
(b)

= B

, x

= k (3-dimensional vectors).
(c) x

= k, x

= l (2-dimensional vectors).
(d) x

= B

(3-dimensional vectors and a given tensor A

).
1B Tensor equations
In the following equations, the tensor X

is unknown and all other quantities are known. The

dimensionality of the (Euclidean) space is indicated. Determine X

under the assumption

that all given quantities are generic.
(a) X

= X

, X

= B

, X

= 0, X

= 0, where A

= 0 (2-dimensional).
(b) X

= X

, X

= B

, X

= 0, where A

= 0 (3-dimensional vectors).
1C Degeneracy of the metric
(a) A two-dimensional space with coordinates (x, y) has the metric given as a bilinear form
g = y
2
dx dx + (x
2
+ 1)(dx dy + dy dx). (1)
Is the metric nondegenerate at all points (x, y)?
(b) The same question for the n-dimensional metric of the form
g

1 + r
2

, (2)
where A

is a given vector and r

2

is the squared Euclidean distance.

WiSe06 T VI General Relativity Problem Sheet 3
http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~serge/WS06-T6/
3 The Christoel symbol

3.1 Transformations 1
In at space with standard Euclidean coordinates

and arbitrary coordinates x

= x

), the Christoel
symbol can be found as

=

2

.
Derive the transformation law for

between arbitrary coordinate systems x

and x

+

2
x

. (1)
3.2 Transformations 2
Show that the Christoel symbol must transform according to Eq. (1) not only in at space but also in arbitrary
space. Hint: consider the covariant derivative of a vector eld,
A
;
=
A

,
and demand that the components A
;
transform as a tensor.
3.3 Covariant derivatives
Derive the explicit form of the covariant derivative
T

;
for a tensor eld T

.
3.4 The Leibnitz rule
Prove the Leibnitz rule in the following specic case,

;
= A
;
B

+A

;
.
3.5 Locally inertial reference frame
Suppose that the Christoel symbol at a point x

(0)
in some coordinate system x

has the value

(0)
and is
symmetric,

(0)
=

(0)
. Then a locally inertial system at point x
0
can be constructed by dening the new
coordinates

(x) = x

(0)
+
1
2

(0)

(0)

(0)
.
The point x
0
in the new coordinates is the origin

= 0. Prove explicitly that the Christoel symbol, when

transformed to the new coordinates, is equal to zero at the point

= 0.
WiSe06 T VI General Relativity Problem Sheet 4
http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~serge/WS06-T6/
4 Geodesics and curvature
4.1 Geodesics
(a) Show that the geodesic equation can be written in the following form,
du

ds

1
2
g

= 0. (1)
(b) Show that g

is constant along a geodesic.

4.2 Commutator of covariant derivatives
Show that
u

;;
u

;;
= R

, (2)
where the Riemann tensor is dened by
R

. (3)
4.3 Parallel transport
Consider a vector A

parallel-transported along a small closed curve x

(s). Show that the change

in A

after the parallel transport can be approximately expressed as

A

(x)A

dx

1
2
R

dx

, (4)
where it is assumed that the area within the closed curve is very small.
Hint: Use a locally inertial coordinate system where

= 0 at one point. Also, show that

dx

dx

. (5)
4.4 Riemann tensor
(a) Using the symmetry properties of the Riemann tensor R

, compute the number of indepen-

dent components of R

in an n-dimensional space (n 2).

(b) Prove the Bianchi identity: R

;
+ R

;
+ R

;
= 0.
(c) Compute the Einstein tensor G

in an arbitrary two-dimensional space. Hint: First determine

the independent components of R

.
4.5 Lorentz transformations
Determine the number of independent parameters in Lorentz transformations x

, given
by matrices

, and interpret these parameters. Hint: It is easier to consider innitesimal Lorentz

transformations

+ H

, where 1 and so
2
can be disregarded.
2
WiSe06 T VI General Relativity Problem Sheet 5
http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~serge/WS06-T6/
5 Gravitation theory applied
5.1 Redshift
Calculate the gravitational redshift at the surface of the Earth for the vertical distance of 1m between the sender
and the receiver. Same question for 1 km.
5.2 Energy-momentum tensor 1
Rewrite the conservation law T

;
= 0 explicitly in the nonrelativistic limit for an ideal uid, and show that these
equations coincide with the continuity equation and the Euler equation.
5.3 Energy-momentum tensor 2
The EMT for a massless scalar eld is
T

=
;

1
2

;
.
Show (using the conservation law) that the equation of motion the eld is
;
;
= 0.
5.4 Weak gravity
Show that in the limit of weak static gravitational eld (g
00
= 1 + 2(x, y, z), and g

is independent of t) the
following relation holds,
R
00
+ O(
2
) ,
where is the ordinary Laplace operator,
xx
+
yy
+
zz
.
5.5 Equations of motion from conservation law
The EMT for a point particle of mass m
0
moving along a worldline x

(s) can be expressed as

T

=
1

g
m
0

ds
dx

ds
dx

ds

(4)
(x

(s)) .
Show that the conservation law T

;
= 0 implies the geodesic equation for x

(s).
Hint: First derive the relations

=
1

g) ,
T

;
=
1

gT

) +

.
WiSe06 T VI General Relativity Problem Sheet 6
http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~serge/WS06-T6/
6 The gravitational eld
6.1 Degrees of freedom
Using the scheme developed in the lecture, compute the number of degrees of freedom in the
electromagnetic eld, taking into account the presence of charges and currents.
6.2 Spherically symmetric spacetime
Compute the Ricci tensor R

and the curvature scalar R for a spherically symmetric gravitational

eld. Assume that the metric has the form
g

e
(t,r)
0 0 0
0 e
(t,r)
0 0
0 0 r
2
0
0 0 0 r
2
sin
2

.
Write the corresponding Einstein equations in vacuum (T

= 0).
6.3 Motion in Schwarzschild spacetime
Derive the equation for the covariant component u
1
of the 4-velocity of a particle in Schwarzschild
spacetime (u
1
() f
1
(r) r, f(r) = 1r
g
/r). Verify that this equation follows from Eqs. (1)(4)
given in the lecture:
f

t
2
f
1
r
2
r
2

2
r
2
sin
2

2
= K (= u

), (1)
d
d

f

t

= 0, (u
0
) (2)
d
d

r
2

+ r
2
sin cos

2
= 0, (u
2
) (3)
d
d

r
2
sin
2

= 0, (u
3
) (4)
where the overdot () denotes d/d and the spherical coordinates are {x
0
, x
1
, x
2
, x
3
} {t, r, , }.
WiSe06 T VI General Relativity Problem Sheet 7
http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~serge/WS06-T6/
7 Weak gravitational elds
7.1 Gravitational bending of light
Verify that the gravitational bending of light passing near the Sun is
= 1.75

R
where R is the distance at which the light passes from the center of the Sun and R

is the radius
of the Sun.
7.2 Einstein tensor for weak eld
Derive the following expression for the Einstein tensor due to a weak gravitational eld,
G

=
1
2

,
,

,
,
+

h

,
,
+

h

,
,

+ O(h
2
), (1)
where

h

= h

1
2

h.
7.3 Gravitational perturbations I
Derive the expressions (shown in the lecture) for the Einstein tensor G

in terms of the scalar,

vector, and tensor perturbations of the gravitational eld. The background is the at Minkowski
spacetime,
(0)
g

, and the metric is

g
00
= 1 + 2, g
0i
= B
,i
+ S
i
, g
ij
=
ij
+ 2
ij
+ 2E
,ij
+ F
i,j
+ F
j,i
+ h
ij
. (2)
7.4 Gravitational perturbations II
Derive the transformation laws for the scalar, vector, and tensor perturbations of the gravitational
eld, under an innitesimal change of the coordinates,
x

= x

(x). (3)
Note: It is convenient to decompose

as

= (
0
,
i

+
,i
), where
0
and are scalar functions
and
i
,i
= 0.
WiSe06 T VI General Relativity Problem Sheet 8
http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~serge/WS06T6/
8 Gravitational radiation I
8.1 Gauge invariant variables
Verify that the following combinations of metric perturbations, D =

B+

E and S
i

F
i
, are gauge-invariant.
8.2 Detecting gravitational waves
Light noninteracting particles are situated in the xy plane in free space. A plane gravitational wave propagating
in the z direction passes through the ring. The metric is of the form g

+h

, where h
n
contains only the
pure tensor component,
h

0 0 0 0
0 A
+
A

0
0 A

A
+
0
0 0 0 0

exp [i (t z)] . (1)

Describe the deformation of the shape of the ring due to the gravitational wave. Consider cases A
+
= 0, A

= 0
and A
+
= 0, A

= 0.
8.3 Poisson equation
Derive the solution of the following dierential equation,
(x) = 4(x), (2)
with boundary conditions 0 at |x| .
8.4 Metric perturbations 1
Determine an explicit expression for through T
0
i,i
, where
i
represents the scalar part of T
0
i
.
8.5 Metric perturbations 2
Verify that the equation

1
2
(

S
i

F
i
) = 8G
i
(3)
which follows from vector part of the spatial Einstein equation, also follows from other components of the Einstein
equation and from the conservation law (as derived in the lecture).
WiSe06 T VI General Relativity Problem Sheet 9
http://www.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~serge/WS06-T6/
9 Gravitational radiation II
9.1 Projection of the matter tensor
The projection operator P
ij
is dened by
P
ij
=
ij
n
i
n
j
, n
i
n
i
= 1, n
i

R
i
R
. (1)
Show that the projected tensor
(T)
X
ik
(t, |

R|) dened by
(T)
X
ik
= P
ia
X
ab
P
bk

1
2
P
ik
P
ab
X
ab
, X
ik
(t, R)

d
3
r r
i
r
k
T
00
(t |R| , r), (2)
has the following properties,
a)
(T)
X
ii
= 0; (3)
b)
(T)
X
ik,i
= O(X |R|
1
), (4)
that is,
(T)
X
ik
is transverse-traceless up to terms of order |R|
1
.
9.2 Matter sources
Verify that
(T)
X
ik
=
(T)
Q
ik
, where
(T)
X
ik
(t |

R|) is the projected tensor dened in Problem 9.1 and

(T)
Q
ik
= P
ia
Q
ab
P
bk

1
2
P
ik
P
ab
Q
ab
, (5)
Q
ik

(r
i
r
k

1
3

ik
r
2
) T
0
0
d
3
r. (6)
9.3 Energy-momentum tensor of gravitational waves
Compute the second-order terms G
(2)

, i.e. terms quadratic in h

, of the Einstein tensor G

for small perturba-

tions in at space, g

+h

, where only the transverse and traceless part

(T)
h
ik
is nonzero. Verify that the
energy-momentum tensor of gravitational waves in vacuum (T

= 0 for matter) is
(GW)
T

1
8G

G
(2)

=
1
32G

(T)
h
i
k
,(T)
h
i
k
,

. (7)
9.4 Power of emitted radiation
Show that the rate of energy loss (energy lost per unit time) is
dE
dt
=
G
8

d
2

(T)
...
Q
ik
(T)
...
Q
ik
=
G
5
...
Q
ik
...
Q
ik
. (8)
Here the integration goes over all directions n
i
in 2-sphere. In the calculation, derive and use the following relations,

n
l
n
m
d
2

4
=
1
3

lm
, (9)

n
l
n
m
n
k
n
r
d
2

4
=
1
15
(
lm

kr
+
lk

mr
+
lk

mr
) . (10)