Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Michael G. Kovalycsik Assistant Vice President Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Vaccines Research, Quality Assurance ASQ February 24th, 2009
Presentation Goals
Present
a systems and risk based approach to auditing investigation and deviation processes and systems. Identify several cGMP required elements of these systems which are likely to be reviewed during regulatory inspections. Review audit approaches covering critical aspects of these systems which may point to compliance gaps.
is a System ?
Websters
What
is the system? What is the system supposed to do and how is it done? Does the system do it? How does the system interact with other key systems? How is the system controlled and measured?
Process Deviation and Failure Investigation System will interact with all other cGMP systems!!!
Examples
Roles
objective is to generate a result or outcome which is supported by either data, documents, records, or reports which will assure the product being produced meets the requirements of safety, identity, strength, purity and quality and is acceptable from a regulatory compliance standpoint.
Questions:
Are
the investigations and deviation reports being initiated/conducted/written/reviewed/approved/reported and analyzed appropriately? Are timing commitments appropriate and are they being met? Are the true root causes being correctly identified and corrected?
Expectations include:
SOPs
or other controlled documentation must be in place describing operations and documentation of performance of these operations.
Procedures
must be appropriately reviewed and approved. Should adequately describe who, what, when, and how for: micro-aspects (individual reports) macro-aspects (root causes, tracking and trending)
Responsible
individuals must be identified for all key tasks. Time commitments are identified.
identify all other areas that support the system or are impacted by the system. Verify adequacy of scope of involvement of these areas
Other
Is
the required involvement of other areas being achieved? How is this documented? Are appropriate responses (based on adequate impact and risk assessments) being taken as a result of system output? How is this documented? Are the responses adequate and timely?
If
system changes are needed are they under appropriate review and approval
Change
of 5 Key Questions:
is the system? What is the system supposed to do and how is it done? Does the system do it? How does the system interact with other key systems? How is the system controlled and measured?
Timing
a Scheduled Audit
Include
in scheduled QC Laboratory Audits, Manufacturing Audits, Clinical Supply and Development Audits, QA Audits or as stand alone audit. Recommend to always include as part of a Rehearsal PAI
Be
sure to include investigations and deviations from relevant clinical trial, development, and validation activities
As an Unannounced Audit An audit necessitated by significant issues such as: New cGMP Expectations or Regulatory Requirements, Recurrent Manufacturing Problems, QA or Corporate Request, or others.
Strategies - Macro-Aspects Goal - Overall assessment of the system for compliance with internal procedures and regulatory expectations. Good Starting Point - SOPs describing the system
Acceptable
and up to date from a regulatory (BPDR) and cGMP standpoint NOTE: Relationship between laboratory failure investigations and manufacturing investigations is critical.
Identify
Are
Records
Recommend
review of at least last 2 years worth to identify those individual reports to explore further. Look for repeat problems Specific products, areas, lab methods, equipment, procedures, individuals, etc. Always review any reports dealing with critical impact areas Sterility and Sterility Assurance !!!
of Investigations and Deviations - Are they reasonable wrt. batches produced, tests performed, etc.? Trending and Reporting of Trending
What How Are
Product,
QA,
Strategies - Macro-Aspects
Individual
Verification of Corrective Action Completion Is there a written requirement? Who is responsible? QA? Audits? What happens if a corrective action commitment is not met?
Strategies - Micro-Aspects
Audits
of individual deviation and investigation reports Compliance with SOPs Scope of the reports
Appropriate
impact assessment and involvement of other departments, analyses, batches, samples, equipment, etc. progress updates, completion of reports
Timeliness
Initiation,
Strategies - Micro-Aspects
of the reports
Required
Completeness
relevant information included or attached Check references as needed. Are all the boxes checked?
Appropriate
QA,
Area Management, Regulatory, Senior Management? What do the review and the approval signify?
Notification
of Related Systems
Again ... The relationship between laboratory failure investigations and manufacturing investigations is critical.
Deviation and Failure Investigation audits can and will likely, lead down any other cGMP audit path. Common other areas include: QA Facilities Engineering and Maintenance Laboratories Customer Complaints Product Recalls many, many more.
Most Important Questions One Should Always Ask Themselves at the End of an Audit:
Do
I understand the area/item/procedure/system I just completed auditing? Does the area/item/procedure/system I just completed reviewing make sense from a cGMP standpoint and is it in compliance?
Presentation Goals
Present
a systems and risk based approach to auditing investigation and deviation systems. Identify several cGMP required elements of these systems which are likely to be reviewed during regulatory inspections. Review audit approaches covering critical aspects of Deviation and Failure Investigation systems which may point to compliance gaps.