SUCCESSION

CIVIL LAW

Succession
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. II. III. IV. Succession in General Testamentary Succession Legal or Intestate Succession Provisions Common to Testamentary and Intestate Succession 99 99 109 114

100% UP LAW

UP

BAROPS

2008

Page 98 of 325

SUCCESSION
DEFINITION OF SUCCESSION (Art. 774, CC) - It is a mode of acquisition - by virtue of which the property, rights and obligations - to the extent of the value of the inheritance, of a person - are transmitted through his death to another or others - either by his will or by operation of law KINDS OF SUCCESSION 1. Testamentary that which results from the designation of an heir, made in a will executed in the form prescribed by law. (Art. 779, CC) 2. Legal or Intestate that which takes place by operation of law in the absence of a valid will. 3. Mixed that which is effected partly by will and partly by operation of law. (Art. 780, CC) KINDS OF HEIRS 1. Compulsory those who succeed by force of law to some portion of the inheritance, in an amount predetermined by law, of which they cannot be deprived by the testator, except by a valid disinheritance. They succeed regardless of a will. 2. Voluntary or Testamentary those who are instituted by the testator in his will, to succeed to the portion of the inheritance of which the testator can freely dispose. They succeed by reason of a will. 3. Legal or Intestate those who succeed to the estate of the decedent who dies without a valid will, or to the portion of such estate not disposed of by will. They succeed in the absence of a valid will.

CIVIL LAW
3. Of sound mind at the time of the execution of the will (Art. 798, CC) *Supervening capacity or incapacity does not affect the will.

C. FORMALITIES OF WILLS
KINDS OF WILLS 1. Notarial an ordinary or attested will (Articles 804-808, CC) 2. Holographic a handwritten will (Art. 810, CC) COMMON REQUIREMENTS TO BOTH WILLS (Art. 804, CC) 1. In writing 2. In a language or dialect known to the testator REQUISITES FOR A VALID NOTARIAL WILL 1. In writing (Art. 804, CC) 2. In a language or dialect known to the testator (Art. 804, CC) 3. Subscribed at the end by the testator himself or by the testators name written by some other person in his presence, and by his express direction (Art. 805, CC) *Requisite of a signature: satisfied by a thumbprint Matias vs. Salud. However, a cross does not. Garcia vs. Lacuesta 4. Attested and subscribed by three or more credible witnesses in the presence of the testator and of one another (Art. 805, CC) *Test of Presence: Not whether they actually saw each other sign, but whether they might have seen each other sign had they chosen to do so considering their mental and physical condition and position with relation to each other at the moment of inscription of each signature. Jaboneta vs. Gustilo, 5 Phil. 541 5. Each and every page, except the last, must be signed by the testator or by the person requested by him to write his name, and by the instrumental witnesses of the will, on the left margin. (Art. 805, CC) *Exceptions: a. when the will consists of only one page b. when the will consists of only two pages, the first of which contains all dispositions and is signed at the bottom by the testator and the witnesses, and the second page contains only the attestation clause duly signed at the bottom by the witnesses. Abangan vs. Abangan *Note: The inadvertent failure of one witness to affix his signature to one
2008 Page 99 of 325

I. TESTAMENTARY SUCCESSION A. CONCEPT

DEFINITION OF WILL (Art. 783, CC) - It is an act - whereby a person is permitted - with the formalities prescribed by law - to control to a certain degree - the disposition of his estate - to take effect after his death

B. TESTAMENTARY CAPACITY
TESTAMENTARY CAPACITY 1. All persons who are not expressly prohibited by law (Art. 796, CC) 2. Eighteen (18) years old and above (Art. 797, CC)
100% UP LAW UP BAROPS

SUCCESSION
page of a testament, due to the simultaneous lifting of two pages in the course of signing, is not per se sufficient to justify denial of probate. Icasiano vs. Icasiano, 11 SCRA 422 6. Each and every page of the will must be numbered correlatively in letters placed on the upper part of each page. (Art. 805, CC) example, page one of five pages 7. It must contain an attestation clause, stating the following (Art. 805, CC) a. The number of pages used upon which the will is written. b. The fact that the testator signed the will and every page, or caused some other person to write his name, under his express direction, in the presence of the instrumental witnesses. c. All the instrumental witnesses witnessed and signed the will and all the pages in the presence of the testator and of one another. 8. It must be acknowledged before a notary public by the testator and the witnesses. (Art. 806, CC) * Note: The notary public before whom the will was acknowledged cannot be considered as the third instrumental witness since he cannot acknowledge before himself his having signed the will. To allow such would have the effect of having only two attesting witnesses to the will which would be in contravention of Articles 805 and 806. Cruz vs. Villasor, 54 SCRA 31 ADDITIONAL REQUISITES FOR A NOTARIAL WILL IF THE TESTATOR BE DEAF OR A DEAF-MUTE (Art. 807, CC) 1. Testator must personally read the will, if able to do so. 2. Otherwise, testator shall designate two persons to read the will and communicate its contents to him in some practicable manner. ADDITIONAL REQUISITES FOR A NOTARIAL WILL IF THE TESTATOR BE BLIND (Art. 808, CC) The will shall be read to the testator twice 1. Once by one of the subscribing witnesses 2. Once by the notary public before whom the will is acknowledged REQUISITES FOR A HOLOGRAPHIC WILL 1. In writing (Art. 804, CC) 2. In a language or dialect known to the testator (Art. 804, CC) 3. Entirely written, dated, and signed by the hand of the testator himself (Art. 810, CC)

CIVIL LAW
AMENDING A WILL 1. Notarial only through a codicil 2. Holographic a. Dispositions may be added below the signature, provided that said dispositions are also dated and signed, and everything is written by the hand of the testator himself b. Certain dispositions or additional matter may be suppressed or inserted provided that such is signed by the testator and written by the hand of the testator himself c. Through a codicil which may either be notarial or holographic EFFECT OF INSERTION WRITTEN BY ANOTHER PERSON ON THE VALIDITY OF A HOLOGRAPHIC WILL WRITTEN BY THE TESTATOR When Made Effect After the execution of Insertion is the will, without the considered not consent of the testator written. The validity of the will cannot be defeated by the malice or caprice of a third person. After the execution of Will is valid. the will, with the Insertion is void. consent of the testator After the execution of Insertion becomes the will, validated by part of the will. the testator by his Entire will becomes signature void because it did not comply with the requirement that it must be wholly written by the testator. Contemporaneous to Will is void because the execution of the will it is not written entirely by the testator. RULES IN CASE OF SUBSEQUENT DISPOSITIONS Subsequent Effect Disposition Signed Valid Not dated Last disposition is signed and dated Not signed Void Dated Signed Void but it does not Not dated affect the validity of the other dispositions or the will itself QUALIFICATIONS OF WITNESSES TO A NOTARIAL WILL (Arts. 820 821, CC (SABRDC)) 1. Of sound mind 2. Of the age of 18 years or more 3. Not blind, deaf or dumb
2008 Page 100 of 325

100% UP LAW

UP

BAROPS

SUCCESSION
4. Able to read and write 5. Domiciled in the Philippines 6. Have not been convicted of falsification of a document, perjury or false testimony INTERESTED WITNESS (Art. 823, CC) - A witness who attests to the execution of a will which gives a legacy or devise to that witness, or his spouse, or his parent or his child. *Effect: The devise or legacy, insofar as it concerns that witness or his spouse or his parent or his child, shall be void unless there are three other witnesses to such will. His competence as a witness shall subsist. GOVERNING LAW As to time Governing Law Formal Validity Law in force at the time the will is made Intrinsic Validity Law of decedents nationality at the time of his death (Art. 16, CC) As to Place Place of Governing Law Execution of the Will Philippines Philippine Law (Art. 16, CC) Outside of 1. Law of the the country in Philippines which it is (Art. 815, executed; or CC) 2. Philippine Law Philippines 1. Philippine Law; (Art. 817, or CC) 2. Law of the Country of which testator is a citizen or subject. Outside the 1. Law of the Philippines place where (Art. 816, the will is CC) executed; or 2. Law of the place where the testator resides; or 3. Law of the testators country; or 4. Philippine Law 4. Intrinsic validity provisions - - - - of

CIVIL LAW
testamentary

JOINT WILL A single testamentary instrument which contains the wills of two or more persons jointly executed by them either for their reciprocal benefit or for the benefit of a third person MUTUAL WILLS Executed pursuant to an agreement between two or more persons to dispose of their property in a particular manner each in consideration of the other separate wills of two persons which are reciprocal in their provisions RECIPROCAL WILLS Testators name each other as beneficiaries under similar testamentary plans

- - -

- -

Testator

Filipino

Note: A will that is both joint and mutual is one executed jointly by two or more persons, the provisions of which are reciprocal and which shows on its face that the devises are made in consideration of the other. Such is prohibited under Art. 819, CC. Prohibition is applicable only to joint wills executed by Filipinos.

D. CODICIL AND INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

DEFINITION OF A CODICIL (Arts. 825 826, CC) - It is a supplement or addition to a will - made after the execution of a will - and annexed to be taken as a part of the will - by which any disposition made in the original will is explained, added to, or altered - It is executed as in the case of a will. REQUISITES FOR INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE (Art. 827, CC) 1. The document or paper referred to in the will must be in existence at the time of the execution of the will. 2. The will must clearly describe and identify the same, stating among other things the number of pages thereof. 3. It must be identified by clear and satisfactory proof as the document or paper referred to therein. And 4. It must be signed by the testator and the witnesses on each and every page, except in case of voluminous books of account or inventories.

Alien

ASPECTS OF THE WILL GOVERNED BY THE NATIONAL LAW OF THE DECEDENT (Arts. 16 and 1039, CC) 1. Order of succession 2. Capacity to succeed 3. Amount of successional rights

100% UP LAW

UP

BAROPS

2008

Page 101 of 325

SUCCESSION E. REVOCATION OF WILLS AND TESTAMENTARY DISPOSITIONS

MODES OF REVOKING A WILL (Art. 830, CC) 1. By implication of law 2. By the execution of a will, codicil or other writing executed as provided in the case of wills 3. By burning, tearing, canceling, or obliterating the will with the intention of revoking it, by the testator himself, or by some other person in his presence, and by his express direction *Note: It must be done any time before the death of the testator. The right of revocation cannot be waived or restricted. (Art. 828, CC) LAWS WHICH GOVERN REVOCATION (Art. 829, CC) PLACE OF TESTATORS GOVERNING REVOCATION DOMICILE LAW In the Philippines or Philippine Philippines in some Law other country Outside the Philippines Philippine Philippines Law Foreign 1. Law of country the place where the will was made; or 2. Law of the place in which the testator had his domicile at the time of revocatio n. DOCTRINE OF DEPENDENT RELATIVE REVOCATION - A revocation subject to a condition does not revoke a will unless and until the condition occurs. Thus, where a testator revokes a will with the proven intention that he would execute another will, his failure to validly make a latter will would permit the allowance of the earlier will. - Where the act of destruction is connected with the making of another will so as to fairly raise the inference that the testator meant the revocation of the old to depend upon the efficacy of the new disposition intended to be substituted, the revocation will be
100% UP LAW UP BAROPS

CIVIL LAW
conditional and dependent upon the efficacy of the new disposition; and if for any reason, the new will intended to be made as a substitute is inoperative, the revocation fails and the original will remain in full force. Molo vs. Molo, 90 Phil. 37

F. ALLOWANCE DISALLOWANCE OF WILLS

- -

AND

PROBATE It is a special proceeding by which the validity of a will may be established. Probate court may pass upon the title thereto, but such determination is provisional, not conclusive, and is subject to the final decision in a separate action to resolve title. Pastor vs. CA 1983 Probate of a will bars criminal prosecution of the alleged forger of the probated will. Mercado vs. Santos 1938

MATTERS TO BE PROVED IN A PROBATE 1. Whether the instrument which is offered for probate is the last will and testament of the decedent 2. Whether the will has been executed in accordance with the formalities prescribed by law 3. Whether the testator had testamentary capacity at the time of the execution of the will GROUNDS FOR DISALLOWANCE OF A WILL (Art. 839, CC) FIFU SM 1. If the Formalities required by law have not been complied with. 2. If the testator was Insane, or otherwise mentally incapable of making a will, at the time of its execution. 3. If it was executed through Force or under duress, or the influence of fear, or threats. 4. If it was procured by Undue and improper pressure and influence, on the part of the beneficiary or of some other person. 5. If the Signature of the testator was procured by fraud. 6. If the testator acted by Mistake or did not intend that the instrument he signed should be his will at the time of affixing his signature thereto. *This list is exclusive.

2008

Page 102 of 325

SUCCESSION
REVOCATION VS. DISALLOWANCE REVOCATION DISALLOWANCE Voluntary act of the Given by judicial testator decree With or without Must always be for a cause legal cause May be partial or Always total except total when the ground of fraud or influence for example affects only certain portions of the will

CIVIL LAW
1. cause for institution of heirs must be stated in the will 2. cause must be shown as false 3. it must appear form the face of the will that the testator would not have made such institution if he had known the falsity of the cause. Austria vs. Reyes 1970 RULES REGARDING A PERSONS RIGHT TO DISPOSE OF HIS ESTATE (Art. 842, CC) 1. If testator has no compulsory heirs a. He can give his estate to any person having capacity to succeed. b. He must respect restriction imposed by special laws. 2. If testator has compulsory heirs a. He can give the disposable portion to strangers. b. Legitimes of compulsory heirs must be respected. CONCEPT OF PRETERITION (Art. 854, CC) 1. There must be a total omission of one, some or all of the heir/s in the will. 2. The omission must be that of a compulsory heir. 3. The compulsory heir omitted must be of the direct line. 4. The omitted compulsory heir must be living at the time of the testators death or must at least have been conceived before the testators death. EFFECTS OF PRETERITION (Art. 854, CC) 1. The institution of the heir is annulled. 2. Devises and legacies shall remain valid as long as they are not inofficious. 3. If the omitted compulsory heir should die before the testator, the institution shall be effectual, without prejudice to the right of representation.

G. INSTITUTION OF HEIRS
DEFINITION OF INSTITUTION OF HEIRS (Art. 840, CC) - It is an act by virtue of which a testator designates in his will - the person/s who are to succeed him in his property and transmissible rights and obligations. REQUISITES FOR A VALID INSTITUTION OF HEIR (DACCVP) 1. Designation in will of person/s to succeed 2. Will specifically assigns to such person an inchoate share in the estate 3. The person so named has capacity to succeed 4. The will is formally valid 5. No vice of consent is present 6. No preterition results from the effect of such will THREE PRINCIPLES IN THE INSTITUTION OF HEIRS 1. Equality heirs who are instituted without designation of shares shall inherit in equal parts. (Art. 846, CC) 2. Individuality heirs collectively instituted are deemed individually named unless a contrary intent is proven. (Art. 847, CC) 3. Simultaneity when the testator calls to the succession a person and his children, they are all deemed to have been instituted simultaneously and not successively. (Art. 849, CC)i INSTITUTION BASED ON A FALSE CAUSE (Art. 850, CC) - General Rule: The statement of a false cause for the institution of an heir shall be considered as not written. - Exception: If it appears from the will that the testator would not have made such institution if he had known the falsity of such cause. In this case, the institution shall be annulled. - Requisites of Annulment under 850:
100% UP LAW UP BAROPS

2008

Page 103 of 325

SUCCESSION

CIVIL LAW

PRETERITION VS. DISINHERITANCE PRETERITION DISINHERITANCE Tacit deprivation of legitime Express deprivation of legitime Presumed to be involuntary as it is an Always voluntary omission to mention an heir or though mentioned, is not instituted as an heir. But it may also be voluntary. Presumed by law to be a mere oversight or Legal cause is present mistake The omitted compulsory heir gets his Even a compulsory heir may be totally legitime plus his share in the free portion not excluded. If disinheritance is not lawfully disposed of by way of legacies and devises. made, the compulsory heir is restored to his legitime. EFFECTS OF PREDECEASE, INCAPACITY, REPUDIATION PRE IN REPUDIA DECEASE CAPACITY TION No right transmitted to the No right transmitted to Voluntary heir heirs of the voluntary heir. the heirs of the who repudiated voluntary heir. cannot transmit any right to his own heirs. Right to the legitime and not Compulsory heir may be Compulsory heir to the free portion represented but only who repudiated transmitted to the with respect to his cannot transmit representatives of the legitime. any right to his compulsory heir. own heirs.

HEIR Voluntary

Compulsory

1.

2.

3.

4.

KINDS OF INSTITUTIONS Simple or Pure the rights to the succession are transmitted from the moment of the death of the decedent. (Art. 777, CC) Conditional may be potestative, causal or mixed. (See Arts. 871 884) *Disposicion Captatoria disposition made upon the condition that the heir shall make some provision in his will in favor of the testator or of any other person. This is void. (Art. 875, CC) With a Term designation of the day or time when the effects of the institution of an heir shall commence or cease. (Art. 885, CC) Modal institution where the testator states the following: (Art. 882, CC) a. the object of the institution; or b. the purpose of the application of the property left by the testator; or c. the charge imposed by the creator upon the heir. *Doctrine of Constructive Compliance When without the fault of the heir, the modal institution cannot take effect in the exact manner stated by the testator, it shall be complied with in a manner most analogous to and in conformity with his wishes. (Art. 883, CC)

H. SUBSTITUTION OF HEIRS
DEFINITION OF SUBSITUTION (Art. 857, CC) - - It is the appointment of another heir so that he may enter into the inheritance in default of the heir originally instituted.

CLASSES OF SUBSITITUTION 1. Vulgar or Simple the testator may designate one or more person/s to substitute the heir/s instituted in case such heir/s should: (Art. 859, CC) a. die before him (predecease) b. should not wish to accept the inheritance (renounce) c. should be incapacitated to accept the inheritance (incapacitated) 2. Brief or Compendious (Art. 860, CC) a. Brief - two or more persons designated by the testator to substitute for only one heir. b. Compendious One person is designated to take the place of two or more heirs. 3. Reciprocal If the heirs instituted in unequal shares should be reciprocally substituted, the substitute shall acquire the share of the heir who dies, renounces, or is incapacitated, unless it clearly appears that the intention of the testator was otherwise. If there are more than one substitute, they shall have the same share in the
2008 Page 104 of 325

100% UP LAW

UP

BAROPS

SUCCESSION
substitution as in the institution. (Art. 861, CC) 4. Fideicommissary if the testator institutes an heir with an obligation to preserve and to deliver to another the property so inherited. The heir instituted to such condition is called the first heir or the fiduciary heir, the one to receive the property is the fideicommissary or the second heir. (Art. 863, CC) REQUISITES FOR A FIDEICOMMISSARY SUBSTITUTION (Arts. 863 865, CC) 1. A fiduciary or first heir instituted entrusted with the obligation to preserve and to transmit to a fideicommissary substitute or second heir the whole or part of the inheritance. 2. The substitution must not go beyond one degree from the heir originally instituted. 3. The fiduciary heir and the fideicommissary are living at the time of the death of the testator. 4. The fideicommissary substitution must be expressly made. 5. The fideicommissary substitution is imposed on the free portion of the estate and never on the legitime. Surviving spouse- SS Legimate Parents- LP Illegitimate Parents- ILP

CIVIL LAW

COMPULSORY HEIRS If the testator is a If the testator is an LEGITIMATE ILLEGITIMATE CHILD CHILD 1. LC and 1. LC and descendants descendants 2. In default of no. 2. ILC and 1, LP and ascendants descendants 3. SS 3. In default of nos. 1- 2, ILP only 4. IC and 4. SS descendants SPECIFIC RULES ON LEGITIMES 1. Direct Descending Line a. Rule of preference between lines - Those in the direct descending line shall exclude those in the direct ascending and collateral lines, and those in the direct ascending line shall, in turn, exclude those in the collateral line. b. Rule of proximity the relative nearest in degree excludes the farther one c. Right of representation ad infinitum in case of predecease, incapacity or disinheritance. For decedents who are legitimate children, only the legitimate descendants can represent. For decedents who are illegitimate children, both the legitimate and illegitimate descendants can represent. d. If all the legitimate children repudiate their legitime, the next generation of legitimate descendants succeed in their own right. 2. Direct Ascending Line a. Rule of division by lines b. Rule of equal division the relatives who are in the same degree shall inherit in equal shares 3. Non-impairment of legitime

I. LEGITIMES
DEFINITION OF LEGITIME (Art. 886, CC) - It is that part of the testators property which he cannot dispose of - because the law has reserved it for his compulsory heirs CLASSES OF COMPULSORY HEIRS (Art. 887, CC) 1. Primary those who have precedence over and exclude other compulsory heirs a. Legitimate children and legitimate descendants with respect to their legitimate parents and ascendants 2. Secondary those who succeed only in the absence of the primary compulsory heirs a. Legitimate parents and legitimate ascendants with respect to their legitimate children and descendants b. Illegitimate parents with respect to their illegitimate children 3. Concurring those who succeed together with the primary or the secondary compulsory heirs a. Widow or widower (legitimate) b. Illegitimate children and illegitimate descendants Legitmate children- LC Illegitimate children- ILC
100% UP LAW UP BAROPS

2008

Page 105 of 325

SUCCESSION

CIVIL LAW
SUMMARY OF LEGITIMES OF COMPULSORY HEIRS LC & SS ILC LP &
DESCENDANTS ASCENDANT S

SURVIVING REL. LC alone 1 LC, SS LC, SS LC, ILC 1 LC, SS, ILC 2 or more LC, SS, ILC LP alone LP, ILC LP, SS LP, SS, ILC ILC alone ILC, SS SS alone

ILP

(divided by # of children) (divided by # of children) (divided by # of children) (preferred) Same as the share of 1 LC Same as the share of 1 LC of the share of 1 LC of the share of 1 LC of the share of 1 LC 1/8 (divided by # of children) 1/3 or 1/3 if marriage in articulo mortis 1/3 1/3 1/3 (adopter) 1/3 (divided by # of children)

ILP alone ILP, SS Adopter ILC, SS

STEPS IN DETERMINING THE LEGITIME OF COMPULSORY HEIRS 1. Determine the gross value of the estate at the time of the death of the testator. 2. Determine all debts and charges which are chargeable against the estate. 3. Determine the net value of the estate by deducting all debts and charges from the gross value of the estate. 4. Collate or add the value of all donations inter vivos to the net value of the estate. 5. Determine the amount of the legitime from the total thus found. 6. Impute the value of all donations inter vivos made to compulsory heirs against their legitime and of the value of all donations inter vivos made to strangers against the disposable free

portion and restore it to the estate if the donation is inofficious. 7. Distribute the residue of the estate in accordance with the will of the testator. REMEDY OF COMPULSORY HEIR IN CASE OF IMPAIRMENT OF LEGITIME 1. If the impairment is total, then there may be preterition if the compulsory heir omitted is either an ascendant or descendant. Art. 854, CC would come in to play, i.e., there will be an annulment of the institution of heirs and a reduction of devises and legacies. 2. If the impairment is partial, then the compulsory heir is entitled to completion of legitime under Art. 906, CC.

100% UP LAW

UP

BAROPS

2008

Page 106 of 325

SUCCESSION
3. If the impairment is through donation, the remedy is collation. CONCEPT OF RESERVA TRONCAL (Art. 891, CC) - The ascendant who inherits from his descendant - any property which the latter may have acquired by gratuitous tile - from another ascendant, or a brother or sister, - is obliged to reserve such property - as he may have acquired by operation of law - for the benefit of relatives within the third degree - and who belong to the line from which said property came. REQUISITES FOR RESERVA TRONCAL Chua vs. CFI, 78 SCRA 406 and Gonzales vs. CFI, 104 SCRA 161 1. that the property was acquired by a descendant (prepositus) from an ascendant or from a brother or sister (source) by gratuitous title 2. that the prepositus died without an issue 3. that the property is inherited by another ascendant (reservista) by operation of law 4. that there are relatives within the 3rd degree (reservatarios) belonging to the line from which said property came
(Source)

CIVIL LAW
3. It must be made in a valid will. 4. It must be made expressly, stating the cause in the will itself. 5. The cause must be certain and true, and must be proved by the interested heir if the person disinherited should deny it. 6. It must be unconditional. 7. It must be total. SUMMARY OF CAUSES OF DISINHERITANCE Art. Art. Art. Art. 919- children/ descendants 920- parents/ ascendants 921- spouse 1032- unworthiness GROUNDS FOR
DISINHERITANCE

919 *

920 *

921

10 32 *

B E

(Reservatario)

G (Reservista)

H
(Prepositus)

J. DISINHERITANCE
DEFINITION OF DISINHERITANCE (Art. 915, CC) - It is the act by which the testator - for just cause - deprives a compulsory heir of his right to the legitime. REQUISITES FOR A VALID DISINHERITANCE 1. Heir disinherited must be designated by name or in such a manner as to leave no room for doubt as to who is intended to be disinherited. 2. It must be for a cause designated by law.
100% UP LAW UP

Guilty/convicted of attempt against life of testator/spouse/ ascendant/descendant Accused testator/decedent of crime punishable by imprisonment of 6 years or more, found groundless, false Causes testator/decedent to make will or change one by fraud, violence, intimidation, or undue influence Unjustified refusal to support testator Convicted of adultery or concubinage with spouse of testator/decedent Maltreatment of testator by word and deed Leading a dishonorable or disgraceful life Conviction of crime which carries penalty of civil interdiction Abandonment of children or inducing children to live corrupt and immoral life or attempted against virtue Loss of parental authority Attempt by one parent against life of the other UNLESS there is reconciliation between parents Spouses given cause
2008

* *

* *

* *

* * *

* *
Page 107 of 325

BAROPS

SUCCESSION
for legal separation Failure to report violent death of decedent within one month, unless authorities have already taken action Force, violence, intimidation or undue influence to prevent another from making a will or revoking one already made or who supplants or alters the latters will Falsifies or forges a supposed will of the decedent favor of the legatee/devisee onerously 5. Not belonging to the testator at the time the will is executed but he has ordered that the thing be acquired in order that it be given to the legatee/devisee. 6. Not belonging to the testator at the time the will is executed and the testator erroneously believed that the thing pertained to him. 7. Not belonging to the testator at the time the will is executed but afterwards it becomes his by whatever title. 8. Already belonged to the legatee/devisee at the time of the execution of the will even though another person may have interest therein 9. Already belonged to the legatee/devisee at the time of the execution of the will even though it may have been subsequently alienated by him. 10. Testator had knowledge that the thing bequeathed belonged to a third person and the legatee/devisee acquired the property gratuitously after the execution of the will. 11. Testator had knowledge that the thing bequeathed belonged to a third person and the legatee/devisee acquired the property by onerous title. estate.

CIVIL LAW

Effective

Void

REVOCATION OF DISINHERITANCE 1. Reconciliation 2. Subsequent institution of the disinherited heir 3. Nullity of the will which contains the disinheritance *Note: The moment the testator uses one of the acts of unworthiness as a cause for disinheritance, he thereby submits it to the rules on disinheritance. Thus, reconciliation renders the disinheritance ineffective.

Effective

Ineffective

K. LEGACIES AND DEVISES

PERSONS CHARGED WITH LEGACIES AND DEVISES 1. Compulsory heir 2. Voluntary heir 3. Legatee or devisee 4. Estate VALIDITY AND EFFECT OF LEGACY OR DEVISE STATUS OF EFFECT ON THE PROPERTY GIVEN LEGACY/DEVISE BY LEGACY/DEVISE 1. Belonging to the Effective testator at the time of the execution of the will until his death 2. Belonging to the Revoked testator at the time of the execution of the will but alienated in favor of a 3rd person 3. Belonging to the No revocation. There testator at the time of is a clear intention to the execution of the comply with the will but alienated in legacy/devise. favor of the legatee or devisee gratuitously 4. Belonging to the Legatee/devisee can testator at the time of demand the execution of the reimbursement from will but alienated in the heirs or the
100% UP LAW UP

Ineffective

Legatee/devisee claim nothing virtue of legacy/devise

can by the

Legatee/devisee can demand reimbursement from the heir or estate.

ORDER OF PAYMENT IN CASE THE ESTATE IS INSUFFICIENT TO COVER ALL LEGACIES AND DEVISES ART. 911, CC VS. ART. 950, CC ART. 911 ART. 950 Order of Preference Order of Preference
2008 Page 108 of 325

BAROPS

SUCCESSION
(LIPO) 1. Legitime of compulsory heirs 2. Donations Inter vivos 3. Preferential legacies or devises 4. All Other legacies or devises pro rata (RPSESO) 1. Remuneratory legacy/devise 2. Preferential legacy/devise 3. Legacy for Support 4. Legacy for Education 5. Legacy/devise of Specific, determinate thing which forms a part of the estate 6. All Others pro rata Application: 1. When there are no compulsory heirs and the entire estate is distributed by the testator as legacies or devises; or 2. When there are compulsory heirs but their legitime has already been provided for by the testator and there are no donations inter vivos. *Art. 950 governs when the question of reduction is exclusively among legatees and devisees themselves.

CIVIL LAW
affecting the bequests; sale of the thing to pay the debts of the deceased during the settlement of his estate. *Note: List is not exclusive.

II. LEGAL SUCCESSION

OR

INTESTATE

Application: 1. When the reduction is necessary to preserve the legitime of compulsory heirs from impairment whether there are donations inter vivos or not; or 2. When, although, the legitime has been preserved by the testator himself there are donations inter vivos. *Art. 911 governs when there is a conflict between compulsory heirs and the devisees and legatees. *Note: In case of reduction, the inverse order of payment should be followed.

CAUSES OF VACANCY IN SUCCESSION 1. Disinheritance the testator creates it himself 2. Repudiation the heir does something 3. Incapacity or Predecease something happens to the heir 1. 2. 3. 4. HOW VACANCIES ARE FILLED Substitution (Art. 857, CC) Representation (Art. 970, CC) Accretion (Art. 1015, CC) Intestate Succession

GROUNDS FOR REVOCATION OF LEGACIES AND DEVISES (Art. 957, CC) 1. Testator transforms the thing bequeathed in such a manner that it does not retain either the form or the denomination it had. 2. Testator by any title or for any cause alienates the thing bequeathed, or any part thereof, it being understood that in the latter case the legacy or devise shall be without effect only with respect to the part alienated. Except: When the thing should again belong to the testator after alienation by virtue of the exercise of the right of repurchase. 3. Thing bequeathed is totally lost during the lifetime of the testator, or after his death without the heirs fault. 4. Other causes: nullity of the will; non- compliance with suspensive conditions
100% UP LAW UP BAROPS

CAUSES FOR LEGAL OR INTESTATE SUCCESSION (Art. 960, CC) 1. If a person dies without a will 2. If a person dies with a void will 3. If a person dies with a will which has subsequently lost its validity 4. When the will does not institute an heir 5. When the will does not dispose of all the property belonging to the testator. Legal succession shall take place only with respect to the property which the testator has not disposed. 6. If the suspensive condition attached to the institution of the heir does not happen or is not fulfilled 7. If the heir dies before the testator 8. If the heir repudiates the inheritance, there being no substitution, and no right of accretion takes place 9. When the heir instituted is incapable of succeeding, except in cases provided in the Civil Code FUNDAMENTAL UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES IN LEGAL OR INTESTATE SUCCESSION 1. Rule of Preference Between Lines Those in the direct descending line shall exclude those in the direct ascending and collateral lines, and those in the direct ascending line shall, in turn, exclude those in the collateral line. 2. Rule of Proximity the relative nearest in degree excludes the farther one. (Art. 962, CC) 3. Rule of Equal Division the relatives who are in the same degree shall inherit in equal shares. (Articles 987 and 1006, CC) Exceptions:

2008

Page 109 of 325

SUCCESSION
a. Division in the ascending line (between paternal and maternal grandparents) b. Division among brothers and sisters, some of whom are of the full and others of half-blood c. Division in cases where the right of representation takes place 4. Rule of Barrier between the legitimate family and the illegitimate family the illegitimate family cannot inherit by intestate succession from the legitimate family and vice-versa. (Art. 992, CC) 5. Rule of Double Share for full blood collaterals when full and half-blood brothers or sisters, nephews or nieces, survive, the full blood shall take a portion in the inheritance double that of the half-blood. (Articles 895 and 983, CC) RELATIONSHIP (Articles 963 969, CC) 1. Number of generations determines proximity. 2. Each generation forms a degree. 3. A series of degrees forms a line. 4. A line may either be direct or collateral. 5. A direct line is that constituted by the series of degrees among ascendants and descendants (ascending and descending). 6. A collateral line is that constituted by the series of degrees among persons who are not ascendants or descendants, but who come from a common ancestor. 7. Full blood same father and mother. 8. Half-blood only one of either parent is the same. 9. In adoption, the legal filiation is personal and exists only between the adopter and the adopted. The adopted is deemed a legitimate child of the adopter, but still remains as an intestate heir of his natural parents and other blood relatives. DEFINITION OF THE RIGHT OF REPRESENTATION (Art. 970, CC) - It is a right created by fiction of law - by virtue of which the representative is raised to the place and degree of the person represented - and acquires the rights which the latter would have if he were living or if he would have inherited. *Notes: -

CIVIL LAW

In the direct line, representation takes place ad infinitum in the direct descending line, never in the ascending. In the collateral line, representation takes place only in favor of the children of the brothers or sisters (i.e., nephews and nieces) whether of the full or half-blood and only if they concur with at least one uncle or aunt.

RIGHT OF REPRESENTATION IN TESTAMENTARY SUCCESSION 1. When a compulsory heir in the direct descending line had predeceased the testator and was survived by his children or descendants. 2. When a compulsory heir in the direct descending line is excluded from the inheritance due to incapacity or unworthiness and he has children or descendants. 3. When a compulsory heir in the direct descending line is disinherited and he has children or descendants; representation covers only the legitime. 4. A legatee or devisee who died afther the death of the testator may be represented by his heirs. RIGHT OF REPRESENTATION IN INTESTATE SUCCESSION 1. When a legal heir in the direct descending line had predeceased the decedent and was survived by his children or descendants. 2. When a legal heir in the direct descending line is excluded from the inheritance due to incapacity or unworthiness and he has children or descendants. 3. When brothers or sisters had predeceased the decedent and they had children or descendants. 4. When illegitimate children represent their deceased illegitimate parents in the estate of their grandparents. 5. When nephews and nieces inherit together with their uncles and aunts in representation of their deceased parents who are brothers or sisters of said uncles and aunts.

100% UP LAW

UP

BAROPS

2008

Page 110 of 325

SUCCESSION
ORDER OF LEGAL OR INTESTATE SUCCESSION DECEDENT IS A LEGITIMATE CHILD LC and Legitimate descendants LP and Legitimate ascendants ILC and Illegitimate descendants SS Legitimate siblings, Nephews, Nieces Legitimate collateral relatives within the 5th degree State DECEDENT IS AN ILLEGITIMATE CHILD LC and Legitimate descendants ILC and Illegitimate descendants ILP

CIVIL LAW

DECEDENT IS AN ADOPTED CHILD LC and Legitimate descendants ILC and Illegitimate descendants LP or ILP and Legitimate ascendants, Adoptive parents SS Siblings, Nephews, Nieces State

1 2 3

4 5 6 7

SS Illegitimate siblings, Nephews, Nieces State

CONCURRENCE IN LEGAL OR INTESTATE SUCCESSION Intestate Heir LC and Legitimate descendants ILC and Descendants LP and Legitimate ascendants ILP SS EXCLUDES Ascendants, Collaterals and State ILP, Collaterals and State Collaterals and State Collaterals and State Collaterals other than siblings, nephews and nieces All other collaterals and State Collateral more remote in degree and State No one EXCLUDED BY No one No one LC LC and ILC No one SS and ILC SS LC and LP ILC and SS SS LC, ILC, LP, ILP Siblings Nephews Nieces SS Collaterals in the same degree No one CONCURS WITH

Siblings, Nephews Nieces Other collaterals within 5th degree State

LC, ILC, LP, ILP LC, ILC, LP, ILP and SS Everyone

A MORE DETAILED SUMMARY OF INTESTATE SHARES 1 LEGITIMATE CHILDREN AND LEGITIMATE DESCENDANTS ALONE SHARE AS FREE TOTAL INTESTATE SHARE AS LEGITIME Intestate Heir DISPOSAL SHARE LC 1 TOTAL 1 2 ONE LEGITIMATE CHILD AND SURVIVING SPOUSE Intestate Heir LC SS TOTAL SHARE AS LEGITIME SHARE AS FREE DISPOSAL TOTAL INTESTATE SHARE 1

100% UP LAW

UP

BAROPS

2008

Page 111 of 325

SUCCESSION

CIVIL LAW

3 LEGITIMATE CHILDREN AND SURVIVING SPOUSE SHARE AS FREE TOTAL INTESTATE SHARE AS LEGITIME Intestate Heir DISPOSAL SHARE LC Remaining portion of Whole estate divided estate after paying equally between total legitimes # of children plus the SS SS Legitimes to be # of children plus the divided equally SS (see above) Same as share of 1 LC between total # of children plus the SS TOTAL Varies on no. of Varies on no. of 1 children children 4 LEGITIMATE CHILDREN AND ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN SHARE AS FREE TOTAL INTESTATE SHARE AS LEGITIME Intestate Heir DISPOSAL SHARE LC Remaining portion of Whole estate divided estate after paying by the ratio of 2:1 for legitimes each LC as compared to the ILC ILC share of 1 LC Legitimes to be 1 for each ILC divided by the ratio of provided that legitimes 2 for each LC, 1 for wouldnt be impaired each ILC TOTAL Varies on # of children Varies on # of children 1 5 ONE LEGITIMATE CHILD, ILLEGITIMATE CHILD, AND SURVIVING SPOUSE SHARE AS LEGITIME SHARE AS FREE TOTAL INTESTATE Intestate Heir DISPOSAL SHARE LC Remaining portion of estate after paying legitimes to be divided by the ratio of 2:1 for each LC and each ILC, respectively 1 for each ILC (see above) Same share as a LC Varies depending on # of ILC Whole estate divided by the ratio of 2 for each LC

ILC SS TOTAL

share of 1 LC or Varies depending on # of ILC

1 for each ILC Legitimes wouldnt be impaired 1

6 LEGITIMATE CHILDREN, ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN AND SURVIVING SPOUSE SHARE AS FREE TOTAL INTESTATE SHARE AS LEGITIME Intestate Heir DISPOSAL SHARE LC Remaining portion of Whole estate divided estate, if any after by the ratio of 2:1 for paying legitimes to be each LC and ILC divided by the ratio of respectively 2 for each LC ILC share of each LC 1 for each ILC (see 1 for each ILC (see above) above) SS Same share as one Same share as a LC, Same share as a LC, LC provided legitimes provided legitimes are not impaired are not impaired TOTAL Varies depending on Varies depending on 1 no. of ILC no. of ILC

100% UP LAW

UP

BAROPS

2008

Page 112 of 325

SUCCESSION
7 LEGITIMATE PARENTS ALONE SHARE AS FREE SHARE AS LEGITIME DISPOSAL

CIVIL LAW

Intestate Heir LP TOTAL

TOTAL INTESTATE SHARE 1 1

8 LEGITIMATE PARENTS AND ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN In testate Heir LP ILC TOTAL SHARE AS LEGITIME SHARE AS FREE DISPOSAL TOTAL INTESTATE SHARE 1

9 LEGITIMATE PARENTS AND SURVIVING SPOUSE SHARE AS FREE SHARE AS LEGITIME Intestate Heir DISPOSAL LP SS TOTAL

TOTAL INTESTATE SHARE 1

10 LEGITIMATE PARENTS, SURVIVING SPOUSE AND ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN SHARE AS FREE TOTAL INTESTATE SHARE AS LEGITIME Intestate Heir DISPOSAL SHARE LP SS 1/8 1/8 ILC TOTAL 7/8 1/8 1 11 ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN ALONE SHARE AS FREE SHARE AS LEGITIME DISPOSAL

Intestate Heir ILC alone TOTAL

TOTAL INTESTATE SHARE 1 1

12 ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN AND SURVIVING SPOUSE SHARE AS FREE TOTAL INTESTATE SHARE AS LEGITIME Intestate Heir DISPOSAL SHARE ILC 1/3 1/6 SS 1/3 1/6 TOTAL 2/3 1/3 1 13 SURVIVING SPOUSE SHARE AS FREE SHARE AS LEGITIME DISPOSAL or 1/3 or 1/3 or 1/3 or 1/3 14 ILLEGITIMATE PARENTS ALONE Intestate Heir ILP TOTAL
100% UP LAW

Intestate Heir SS TOTAL

TOTAL INTESTATE SHARE 1 1

SHARE AS LEGITIME
UP BAROPS

SHARE AS FREE DISPOSAL

2008

TOTAL INTESTATE SHARE 1 1

Page 113 of 325

SUCCESSION

CIVIL LAW

15 ILLEGITIMATE PARENTS AND SURVIVING SPOUSE SHARE AS FREE TOTAL INTESTATE SHARE AS LEGITIME Intestate Heir DISPOSAL SHARE ILP SS TOTAL 1 16 SIBLINGS, NEPHEWS AND NIECES ALONE (SPECIAL KIND OF COLLATERAL RELATIVES) SHARE AS FREE SHARE AS LEGITIME DISPOSAL

Intestate Heir Siblings, nephews, nieces TOTAL

TOTAL INTESTATE SHARE 1 1

17 SURVIVING SPOUSE, SIBLINGS, NEPHEWS AND NIECES SHARE AS FREE TOTAL INTESTATE SHARE AS LEGITIME Intestate Heir DISPOSAL SHARE SS Siblings, nephews, nieces TOTAL 1 ORDER OF CONCURRENCE IN THE CASE OF AN ADOPTED CHILD (Art. 190, FC) SURVIVORS SHARE LC, ILC, SS As in the case of ordinary intestate succession LP or ascendants or ILP Adopter LP or ascendants or ILP or Adopter SS LP or ascendants Adopter ILC or descendants LP or ascendants 1/3 Adopter SS 1/3 ILC or descendants 1/3 Adopter alone Entire estate Collateral blood relatives As in the case of ordinary intestate succession

III. PROVISIONS SUCCESSIONS A. ACCRETION

- - - -

COMMON

TO

TESTAMENTARY

AND

INTESTATE

DEFINITION OF ACCRETION (Art. 1015, CC) It is a right by virtue of which when two or more persons are called to the same inheritance, devise or legacy the part assigned to one who renounces or cannot receive his share or who died before the testator is added or incorporated to that of his co-heirs, co-devisees, or co-legatees.

100% UP LAW

UP

BAROPS

2008

Page 114 of 325

SUCCESSION

CIVIL LAW

EFFECT OF PREDECEASE, INCAPACITY, DISINHERITANCE OR REPUDIATION IN TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE SUCCESSION CAUSE OF VACANCY Predecease TESTAMENTARY SUCCESSION LEGITIME FREE PORTION Representat'n Accretion Intestate Succession Intestate Succession Representat'n Intestate Succession Representat'n Intestate Succession Intestate Succession Accretion Accretion Intestate Succession - INTESTATE SUCCESSION Representat'n Intestate Succession Representat'n Intestate Succession -

Incapacity

Disinheritance

Repudiation

Accretion f. Physician, surgeon, nurse, health officer or druggist who took care of the testator during his last illness.

B. CAPACITY TO SUCCEED
REQUISITES FOR CAPACITY TO SUCCEED BY WILL OR BY INTESTACY (Art. 1024 1025, CC) 1. The heir, legatee or devisee must be living or in existence at the moment the succession opens; and 2. He must not be incapacitated or disqualified by law to succeed. WHO ARE INCAPABLE OF SUCCEEDING 1. BASED ON UNDUE INFLUENCE OR INTEREST (Art. 1027, CC) - PIGRAP a. Priest who heard the last confession of the testator during his last illness, or the minister of the gospel who extended spiritual aid to him during the same period; b. Individuals, associations and corporations not permitted by law to inherit; c. Guardian with respect to testamentary dispositions given by a ward in his favor before the final accounts of the guardianship have been approved, even if the testator should die after the approval thereof; except if the guardian is his ascendant, descendant, brother, sister, or spouse; d. Relatives of the priest or minister of the gospel within the fourth degree, the church, order, chapter, community, organization, or institution to which such priest or minister may belong; e. Attesting witness to the execution of a will, the spouse, parents, or children, or any one claiming under such witness, spouse, parents, or children;
100% UP LAW UP BAROPS

2. BASED ON MORALITY OR PUBLIC POLICY (Art. 739, CC) a. Those made in favor of a person with whom the testator was guilty of adultery or concubinage at the time of the making of the will. b. Those made in consideration of a crime of which both the testator and the beneficiary have been found guilty. c. Those made in favor of a public officer or his spouse, descendants and ascendants, by reason of his public office. 3. BASED ON ACTS OF UNWORTHINESS (Art. 1032, CC) See table under disinheritance PARDON OF ACTS OF UNWORTHINESS EXPRESS IMPLIED Made by the Effected when the execution of a testator makes a document or any will instituting the writing in which the unworthy heir with decedent condones knowledge of the the cause of cause of incapacity incapacity Cannot be revoked Revoked when the testator revokes the will or the institution

2008

Page 115 of 325

SUCCESSION C. ACCEPTANCE AND REPUDIATION OF INHERITANCE

CHARACTERISTICS VIR (Articles 1041 1042, 1056, CC) 1. Voluntary and free 2. Irrevocable except if there is vitiation of consent or an unknown will appears 3. Retroactive REQUISITES (Art. 1043, CC) 1. certainty of death of the decedent 2. certainty of the right to the inheritance ACCEPTANCE VS. REPUDIATION 1. Acceptance involves the confirmation of transmission of successional rights, while repudiation renders such transmission ineffective. 2. Repudiation is equivalent to an act of disposition and alienation. 3. The publicity required for repudiation is necessary for the protection of other heirs and also of creditors. FORMS OF ACCEPTANCE (Articles 1049 1050, CC) 1. Express Acceptance one made in a public or private document. 2. Tacit Acceptance one resulting from acts by which the intention to accept is necessarily implied or from acts which one would have no right to do except in the capacity of an heir. Examples would be when the heir sells, donates or assigns his right, when the heir demands partition of the inheritance, when the heir alienates some objects of the inheritance, etc. FORMS OF REPUDIATION (Art. 1051, CC) 1. in a public instrument acknowledged before a notary public; or 2. in an authentic document equivalent of an indubitable writing or a writing whose authenticity is admitted or proved; or 3. by petition presented to the court having jurisdiction over the testamentary or intestate proceeding HEIRS IN TWO CAPACITIES (Art. 1055, CC) - If a person is called to the same inheritance as an heir by will and by law and he -

CIVIL LAW
repudiates the inheritance in his capacity as a testamentary heir, he will be considered to have also repudiated the inheritance as a legal heir. If he repudiates it as a legal heir, without his being a testamentary heir, he may still accept it in the latter capacity.

D. COLLATION (Articles 1061 1077, CC)

- - - CONCEPT OF COLLATION To collate is to bring back or to return to the hereditary mass in fact or by fiction property which came from the estate of the decedent, during his lifetime by donation or other gratuitous title but which the law considers as an advance from the inheritance. It is the act by virtue of which, the compulsory heir who concurs with other compulsory heirs in the inheritance bring back to the common hereditary mass the property which they may have received from the testator so that a division may be effected according to law and the will of the testator. OPERATIONS RELATED TO COLLATION Collation adding to the mass of the hereditary estate the value of the donation or gratuitous disposition. Imputing or Charging crediting the donation as an advance on the legitime (if the donee is a compulsory heir) or on the free portion (if the donee is a stranger). Reduction determining to what extent the donation will remain and to what extent it is excessive or inofficious. Restitution return or payment of the excess to the mass of hereditary estate.

- -

1.

2.

3.

4.

PERSONS OBLIGED TO COLLATE 1. General Rule: compulsory heirs Exceptions: a. when the testator should have so expressly provided b. when the compulsory heir should have repudiated his inheritance

100% UP LAW

UP

BAROPS

2008

Page 116 of 325

SUCCESSION
2. Grandchildren who survive with their uncles, aunts, or first cousins and inherit by right of representation *Note: Grandchildren may inherit from their grandparent in their own right, i.e., as heirs next in degree, and not by right of representation if their parent repudiates the inheritance of the grandparent, as no living person can be represented except in cases of disinheritance and incapacity in which case grandchildren are not obliged to bring to collation what their parent has received gratuitously from their grandparent. WHAT TO COLLATE 1. Any property or right received by gratuitous title during the testators lifetime. 2. All that they may have received from the decedent during his lifetime. 3. All that their parents would have brought to collation if alive. PROPERTIES NOT SUBJECT TO COLLATION 1. Absolutely no collation a. Expenses for support, education (only elementary and secondary), medical attendance, even in extraordinary illness, apprenticeship, ordinary equipment, or customary gifts. (Art. 1067, CC) 2. Generally not imputable to legitime a. Expenses incurred by parents in giving their children professional, vocational or other career unless the parents so provide, or unless they impair the legitime. b. Wedding gifts by parents and ascendants consisting of jewelry, clothing, and outfit except when they exceed 1/10 of the sum disposable by will.

CIVIL LAW E. PARTITION AND DISTRIBUITON OF ESTATE (Articles 1078 1105, CC)
CONCEPT OF PARTITION (Art. 1079, CC) - It is the separation, division and assignment - of a thing held in common among those to whom it may belong. - The thing itself or its value may be divided. WHO MAY EFFECT PARTITION 1. decedent, during his lifetime by an act inter vivos or by will 2. heirs 3. competent court 4. third person designated by the decedent WHO CAN DEMAND PARTITION 1. compulsory heir 2. voluntary heir 3. legatee or devisee 4. any person who has acquired interest in the estate WHEN PARTITION CANNOT BE DEMANDED PAPU 1. when expressly Prohibited by the testator for a period not exceeding 20 years 2. when the co-heirs Agreed that the estate shall not be divided for a period not exceeding 10 years, renewable for another 10 years 3. when Prohibited by law 4. when to partition the estate would render it Unserviceable for the use for which it is intended PROHIBITION TO PARTITION 1. The prohibition to partition for a period not exceeding 20 years can be imposed on the legitime. 2. If the prohibition to the partition is for more than 20 years, the excess is void. 3. Even if a prohibition is imposed, the heirs by mutual agreement can still make the partition. PARTITION INTER VIVOS (Art. 1080, CC) - It is one that merely allocates specific items or pieces of property on the basis of the pro-indiviso shares fixed by law or given under the will to heirs or successors.

100% UP LAW

UP

BAROPS

2008

Page 117 of 325

SUCCESSION
EFFECTS OF INCLUSION OF INTRUDER IN PARTITION 1. Between a true heir and several mistaken heirs partition is void. 2. Between several true heirs and a mistaken heir transmission to mistaken heir is void 3. Through error or mistake, share of true heir is allotted to mistaken heir partition shall not be rescinded unless there is bad faith or fraud on the part of the other persons interested, but the latter shall be proportionately obliged to pay the true heir of his share. The partition with respect to the mistaken heir is void. A VOID WILL MAY BE A VALID PARTITION 1. If the will was in fact a partition 2. If the beneficiaries of the void will were legal heirs IMPORTANT PERIODS TO REMEMBER 1 month or Testator, if publicly known less before to be insane, burden of making a will proof is on the one claiming validity of the will 20 years Maximum period testator can prohibit alienation of dispositions 5 years from To claim property delivery to escheated to the State the State 1 month To report knowledge of violent death of decedent lest he be considered unworthy 5 years from Action for declaration of the time incapacity & for recovery disqualified of the inheritance, devise person took or legacy possession 30 days from Must signify issuance of acceptance/repudiation order of otherwise, deemed distribution accepted 1 month form Right to repurchase written notice hereditary rights sold to a of sale stranger by a co-heir 10 years To enforce warranty of title/quality of property adjudicated to co-heir from the time right of action accrues 5 years from To enforce warranty of partition solvency of debtor of the estate at the time partition is made 4 years form Action for rescission of partition partition on account of lesion

CIVIL LAW
SAMPLE BAR QUESTIONS 1. Alfonso, a bachelor without any descendant or ascendant, wrote a last will and testament in which he devised, all the properties of which I may be possessed at the time of my death to his favorite brother Manuel. At the time he wrote the will, he owned only one parcel of land. But by the time he died, he owned 20 parcels of land. His other brothers and sisters insist that his will should pass only the parcel of land he owned at the time it was written, and did not cover his properties acquired, which should be by intestate succession. Manuel claims otherwise. Who is correct? Explain. Answer: Manuel is correct because under Art. 793, NCC, property acquired after the making of a will shall only pass thereby, as if the testator had possessed it at the time of making the will, should it expressly appear by the will that such was his intention. Since Alfonsos intention to devise all properties he owned at the time of his death expressly appears on the will, then all the 20 parcels of land are included in the devise. 2. Cristina, the illegitimate daughter of Jose and Maria, died intestate, without any descendant or ascendant. Her valuable estate is being claimed by Ana, the legitimate daughter of Jose, and Eduardo, the legitimate son of Maria. Is either, both, or neither of them entitled to inherit? Explain. Answer: Neither Ana nor Eduardo is entitled to inherit ab intestate from Cristina. Both are legitimate relatives of Cristinas illegitimate parents and therefore they fall under the prohibition prescribed un Art. 992, NCC (Manuel vs. Ferrer, 242 SCA 477; Diaz vs. CA, 182 SCRA 427). 3. (a) Luis was survived by 2 legitimate children, 2 illegitimate children, his parents, and 2 brothers. He left an estate of P1 million. Who are the compulsory heirs of Luis, how much is the legitime of each, and how much is the free portion of his estate, if any? (b) Suppose Luis, in the preceding question, died intestate. Who are his intestate heirs, and how much is the share of each in his estate?

100% UP LAW

UP

BAROPS

2008

Page 118 of 325

SUCCESSION
Suggested Answer: (a) The compulsory heirs are the 2 legitimate children and the 2 illegitimate children. The parents are excluded by the legitimate children, while the brothers are not compulsory heirs at all. Their respective legitimes are: 1. The legitime of the 2 legitimate children is of the estate (P500,000) to be divided between them equally, or P250,000 each. 2. The legitime of each illegitimate child is the legitime of each legitimate child or P125,000. Since the total legitimes of the compulsory heirs is P750,000, the balance of P250,000 is the free portion. (b) The intestate heirs are the 2 legitimate children and the 2 illegitimate children. In intestacy, the estate of the decedent is divided among the legitimate and illegitimate children such that the share of each illegitimate child is the share of each legitimate child. Their shares are: 1. For each legitimate child: P333,333.33 2. For each illegitimate child: P166,666.66

CIVIL LAW

100% UP LAW

UP

BAROPS

2008

Page 119 of 325