Runaway Slave Documentary Exposed

At first I didnt desire to write about this issue, because I didnt want to be too politically divisive. Yet, when people like Rush Limbaugh, Herman Cain, Donald Trump, and Alan West are saying false comments, then I will not be silent. Silence is betrayal as the late Dr. Martin Luther King said. Its a new time in 2012 and secrets are coming out. I am a very smart man and I have access to tons of sources. Therefore, I knew by instinct that I will write on this issue. We know this issue. The issue is that the reactionaries are trying to make people of color to be submissive to their political views (so, they could be controlled by Tea Party/Republican political machine). Its bigger than one political party though. The reality is that the 2 party duopoly is one reason why independent political voices are suppressed. I am going to write whats on my mind. These people love their master too much. They love to smile like a Cheshire cat, but God plus real people are on to their slick games. Its bigger than them though. Its about a group of elitists and supremacists trying to dominate not only people of color, but the 99 percent too. I struggle with writing on this issue, because I dont want to be seen as a hater. Yet, God would want the total truth to be shown in season and out of season. Therefore, I will show the truth even if some people dont like it. Even if a deficit hawk doesnt like my words, the truth is that Social Security has a surplus. Even if a theocrat hates my views, loving your neighbor as yourself regardless of their background means something. Even if a war monger or AIPAC doesnt like it, the truth is that Iran has no nuclear warheads whatsoever. Iran is no immediate or direct threat to America or Israel. So, I am going to speak the truth here fearlessly. WHY DOES D. L. BRYANT CALL HIMSELF A RUNAWAY SLAVE WHEN HE ISNT? I AM NOT SLAVE EITHER. I AM A FREEMAN. ALSO, HE SAYS THAT THE REPUBLICANS DONT OWN HIM, YET HE SPEWS REPUBLICAN TALKING POINTS THROUGHOUT HIS DOCUMENTARY. I WILL NOT JOIN THE RAILROAD TO REACTIONARY PROPAGANDA, BUT I WILL JOIN THE UNDERGROUND RAILROAD TOWARD PROGRESSIVE THINKING AND TRUE LIBERTY. SO, THEY WANT US TO WEAR SUITS AND TIES AND WORSHIP THEIR WAY OF LIFE OF COLORBLINDNESS & APPLE PIE DECEPTIONS. SORRY, THAT ISNT ME. I DONT PLAY THAT GAME PERIOD. I AM A GROWN, STRONG BLACK MAN. I DONT HAVE TO THINK LIKE A REPUBLICAN OR A DEMOCRAT TO BE FREE. I reject completely the agendas of warmongers and corporate pirates. NO, SIR, THE FREE MARKET SYSTEM IS NOT ALMIGHTY GOD NEITHER IS AMERICA GOD EITHER. I CAN JUST BE INDEPENDENT IN ORDER FOR ME TO BE FREE.

It's not a secret anymore that the new world order agenda is real. Even David Rockefeller wrote in his own Memoirs from 2002 that:

For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalists and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure one world, if you will. If thats the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
These elitists say it in our faces about desiring an one world structure. Some people falsely believe that terrorists exist under every corner and that we should just follow Homeland Security at every single circumstance. The DHS promotes the See Something, Say Something view that can cause some to take things overboard in terms of conducting their everyday affairs. The government says that Al-Qaeda and homegrown threats are still real. Yet, when you investigate things, you see the war on terror is a hoax. Many have seen that the government used fear as an excuse to violate our rights and formulate unjust wars. Over the last 10 years, there has been trillions of dollars spent on anti-terror actions. Much of society has drones, and the TSA molesting people. There are naked X-Ray scanners, and other police state actions committed by the military industrial complex. The government and the corporate whorish media promote the war on terror as an excuse to violate our liberties, form an Empire, and harm our way of life. Even Knight of Malta Tom Ridge admitted that in his book that people issued terrorist alerts for political gain. Scientific American proven that terrorist threats has been exaggerated in the world. There are more of a risk of dying of cancer, traffic accidence, homicide, etc. than terrorism in America (many of it has been provocateured in America). The number one killer of human beings in the last century has been tyrannical government. The global technocratic elite use evil government to permit wars and harm against human beings. The oligarchy is egoistical and they view themselves as gods. Tyrannical government (not true social democratic governments) has killed over 260 million people in the 20th century alone. The death count continues to go on in the 21st century. Government can be bad when used in an evil fashion. For example, the Communist Party killed over70 million people from 1949 to 1987 killed over 76 million people. The USSR from 1917 to 1987 killed over 61 million people. Western colonialism killed over 50 million people. Hitlers Nazis killed over 20 million people including their own German population. Imperialist Japan killed almost 6 million people from 1936-1945. Before Mao came into power, China murdered 3.468 million people. Pol Pot in Cambodia (who was funded by Brzezinski and the United States government) from 1975 to 1979 killed over 2 million people. The Turkish killers murdered 1.8 million Armenians. The list goes on and on. Tito killed over 1 million people in then Yugoslavia. Over 1 million people were murdered in Russia before the Russian revolution. These deaths involve innocent civilians being murdered via democide. Our own government promoted the laws promoting immoral, anti-liberty laws. The

elite believes in eugenics, which was a pseudo-science. The Nazis used the race purification program. Eugenics was supported by the British Royal Society. Eugenics has been embraced by the elite among thousands of years (eugenics believes that a certain elite are divine and has the right to exterminate masses of human beings if they are falsely deemed "inferior" or "unfit"). Eugenics wants society to be dominated by a select ruling class. Liberty grew worldwide, so the government used covert acts in trying to suppress human liberties. Even Bertrand Russell believed that drugs can be used to control populations. That is why chemicals are in our foods and water to make society less intelligent, more docile, and more compliant to the status quo. The Tuskegee Experiment, tests in Europe, and NSM 200 calling for food and war as a weapon to reduce the population in the Third World proves that eugenics like tactics are still here in the modern era. Holden and others admit that they are establishing covert population control actions. BPA is poison too. They want to reduce our fertility. America has high rates of diabetes and other diseases. World government is one slick goal of these elitists. The elites are worse than Nazis since they killed more people than the Nazis (also, the elite funded the Nazis overtly and covertly). Also, they used ideas like "humanitarianism" as an excuse to promote their antipopulation rhetoric. Bill Gates wants vaccines to reduce the world's population and his father Gates Sr. was a leader in Planned Parenthood. GMOs can cause infertility and other evils in animals and humans. This has been exposed by researcher Jeffrey M. Smith and tons of other human beings. That's all the more reason for all of us to get healthy and get organic foods. Bill Gates, Rockefeller, and GMO giants are building vaults worldwide with non-GMO foods. Yet, these hypocrites promote GMO foods for the rest of the population (and the Rockefellers & others eat organic non-GMO foods in their own mansions). The FDA's new regulations refuse to label foods as non-GMO and GMO. Prince Philip, the Queen, and others refuse to eat GMO foods, but we are forced to embrace GMOs. Even the Amish are oppressed for producing their own raw, organic milk. Some of the Communist Chinese leaders are promoting GMOs to sterilizing their own people (this can cause cancer in human beings). The elite can poison people. Some vaccines have dangers of a soft kill mechanism in them. That is why the technocrats dehumanize man. George Soros, Ted Turner, George Soros, David Rockefeller, and Oprah Winfrey (including others) had a secret meeting to promote ways to reduce population. The same people wanting to reduce world population use the excuse of humanitarianism, education, etc. as means to con people. Groups like GAVI, AGRA, Monsanto, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (headed by billionaires with their own private chiefs and farms) are keenly involved in that agenda. Level 4 weaponized viruses that can kill humans exist now. The PNAC Document advocated genotype specific biowarfare. Even many nuclear plants now are leaking in our environment and some are being lax in doing something about it. There is paranoia about terrorist, but some in the government via the Air Forces tested hundreds of hydrogen bombs in the upper atmosphere to see if they can blow a hole in the atmosphere (we have chimera monkey developed in labs as well via combining several embryos into one). *Government can be good if it's harnessed to just protect our liberties, if its fair, if it can help the poor (including the elderly and all peoples), and it is utilized to promote the general welfare of our people. The government works great when its run efficiently to benefit the people not

the corporations. Corporate personhood ought to completely banned in our society. Austerity and deficit hawk propaganda arent embraced in my psyche, but truth & justice against economic inequality. We have to promote life. The elite are so arrogant that they admit to their plans in their own speeches, documents, and literature. Life, truth, and justice are superior to tyranny.

The famous 2008 IOUSA documentary is a part of austerity propaganda. Peter G. Peterson supported the documentary. Peterson since the 1970's desired especially the privatization of all of Social Security for the youth. He lied and said that Social Security could be gone when Social Security has a surplus (and will remain for a very long with little twists in it). Stealing money from Social Security has been a vision of Republicans for generations. The film claims that our current system is unsustainable absent drastic action. We have huge health care costs in America's corporate health care system. If we can keep the health care costs under control, then we can handle budget deficit issues and a better standard of living. The documentary claims that people from across the political spectrum support their austerity agenda. The reality is that most Republicans like the Heritage Foundation and centrists like the Brookings Institute agree with this fiscal agenda. Social spending had nothing to do with the stagnant economy in the 1970's. The slowdown of productivity growth in the 1970's because of automation and globalization influenced the economic slowdown of the 1970's.The government can maintain deficits as long as the growth of debt doesn't exceed the growth of GDP. The ratio of debt to GDP doesn't rise over time is one sign of fiscal stability. The film says that our children and grandchildren will be forced to sacrifice some parts of Social Security. This is pure paranoia. This fact is completely meaningless from the standpoint of Social Security. The program is projected to hold more than $5 trillion in government bonds at that point. The Congressional Budget Office projects that these bonds, together with annual tax revenue, will be sufficient to keep the program fully solvent until 2049 with no changes whatsoever (or in the 2030s). The attack on Social Security has been a goal of the plutocracy since its invention. That is why the Congressional puppets in 2010 cut payroll contributions to Social Security from 6.2% to 4.2%, representing a loss to the Social Security Fund of $140 billion the first year! This 2010 Obama/Republican Party payroll tax cut actually represented a 30 percent reduction of money going into Social Security. Peter Peterson is a hypocrite since he wants to destroy Social Security for us who are young, while he collects $2,700 a month from Social Security. Social Security payments help those who are in near poverty. Once, the elderly poverty rate was at 35%, which was as late as 1959. Now, it's about 10%, because of the reliable Social Security program that they have paid into. Social Security isn't part of the federal budget since it is independent of it being a depository fund. It isn't an entitlement program being paid for by government taxes. It's a separate program with its own revenue stream and retiree payments. This Social Security trust fund system is one of the few programs set up by the federal government that continues to operate successfully. To take a sample year, in 2002, the SSS received $627 billion in checks, $453.8 billion in taxes, and an additional $49 billion in interest. Instead of red ink, Social Security made almost $102 billion in profit, to add to the trillions it has in surplus from previous years. The film talks about the shift from surpluses to deficit. This was caused by the stock market bubble and the recession not by social programs. You will notice that these deficit hawks refuse to reduce the public sector health care costs by reforming the U.S. health care system itself. People like Peterson won't call for a single payer type of health care system. The idea being to reduce costs by making health care more efficient rather than just cutting services in Medicare and other public

sector programs. Big Pharma dominates the health care system in the USA mostly. A radical deficit reduction plan is silly when individuals need jobs now. The documentary is right on some things. It's correct to point out that we should look in our debt and deficit statistics in a cogent, mature fashion. It's right to expose the expensive nature of tax cuts for the super rich too. Yet, the film is pro-corporatist.

I regard Africa as my fatherland. I am primarily interested in seeing it become completely free of outside political and economic influence that has dominated and exploited it. -Malcolm X (Taken from Al-Muslimoon Magazine, February, 1965) "I don't think the Republican Party is a party full of the almighty God nor is the Democratic Party. They both have weaknesses ... And I'm not inextricably bound to either party. -Dr. Martin Luther King (from December of 1958)

There is always going to be a type of person that reactionaries love to hear. They are trying to be someone that they are not. They love their old Republican talking points and use the name of the dear Lord as an excuse to worship a false Master (See, I love to go old school on these types of people). You will notice that these people will never tell Wall Street to have personal responsibility. The real Promised Land is a place where human liberty and a rejection of neoconservative ideologies are absolute truisms. This person moves around in a framework of claiming that he or she arrived, but the STRUGGLE CONTINUES. THE STRUGGLE DIDNT

STOP. See, we shouldnt be conscious about integrating with a corrupt culture. We shouldnt be conscious about a dollar. We should be conscious about our souls, our Creator, and our people. Its certainly is time to build. "Runaway Slave" is
a new made by a man that wants to continue the Left/Right Paradigm. His message is that the Democrats are wrong and the Republicans are correct. So, black people must be Republicans according to the mindstate of these deluded reactionaries. C. L Bryant is the leader of the documentary. He was once a part of the NAACP and then he left it for in his mind, it represented secular humanism. He's a Tea Party Republican. The Tea Party is known as for its extremist rhetoric. He works for Freedom Works. The reality is that both parties aren't perfect. Henceforth, black people have the right to join whatever party he or she wishes. I am not a Republican. I am not a Democrat (as I don't agree with the President Barack Obama's military strikes in Libya, his refusal to oppose the Patriot Act, his refusal to end the

federal war on Drugs that damages communities nationwide, his pull back on anti-smog legislation, his drone attacks in Pakistan, and his refusal to adequately address poverty. At least the Poor Peoples Campaign of 1967-1968 addressed the issue of poverty in an elaborate, cogent fashion). I am an

Independent. In this generation, black neo-cons and their ilk try to use the Great Society as an excuse to demonize any government program. Don't worry; I will discuss the Great Society later (and refute the lies of numerous reactionaries about this issue). They
view the problems in the black community as solely the government's fault (or black culture even, which is blatantly racist in my opinion. instead of the white supremacist system (and corporate corruption. See, they refuse to expose evil corporations. They also refuse to expose white supremacy, which is a great enemy of black human beings). Black culture includes concepts like fashion, love of family, reverence for the ancestors, unity, and strength not degeneracy). The government isn't perfect, but the government can be utilized as a constructive avenue to be part of the solution. The content in the film is purely pro-Republican rhetoric. This film didn't expose the Patriot Act or the criminal actions of President George W. Bush administration. "Runaway Slave" claims that most African Americans were Republicans before 1960's. The truth is that shift transpired under FDR, because FDR allowed executive orders to begin some desegregation in certain occupations. John F. Kennedy gained most of the African American vote, because his platform promised the black community of dealing with equal housing, civil rights, and job opportunities. There are legitimate criticisms about JFK on this issue, but there can be no mistake that both parties have their fair share of dirt. Also, JFK promoted landmark civil rights legislation, he desired health care for the elderly and he proposed other progressive legislation. The Lyndon Johnson Great Society program cut poverty in half from 1960 to 1970. Between 1960 and 1973, these efforts cut poverty in half, from 22 to 11 percent. Meanwhile, between 1965 and 1976, the richest 1 percent had gone from owning 37 percent of America's wealth to only 22 percent. All of the Great Society programs weren't perfect (as fathers should be given real respect in American culture. Too often, fathers aren't given their due in terms of their contributions to family structure). This doesn't mean that all public programs to help fight poverty ought to be eliminated. Mostly middle class programs like student loans, school lunches, job training, veterans pensions and Medicaid (three-fourths of which goes not to the poor but the elderly and disabled) are vitally important. Such programs ought to be maintained. Also, welfare isn't slavery as the silly Runaway Slave movie says. Some people legitimately need it and mostly white Americans (who make up about 65 percent of US population) have welfare not black Americans (who make up about 13 percent of the US population). Welfare is criticized by reactionaries, but the documentary will not criticize crony capitalism, corporate welfare, and the outsourcing of jobs overseas. The documentary presents the racist picture of black people collectively acting as dumb slaves to the Democratic Party. The reality is that blacks have a great deal of intellectual maturity to make up their own minds. With the comments from Gingrich, Romney, Ron Paul, and other Republicans alone, I understand why most black Americans aren't Republicans. Calling black Democrats plantation slaves (as Runaway Slave presents. The man is a preacher) is just as wrong as saying that all black Republicans (or all black conservatives) are sellouts. A black person doesn't become free by worshipping Republicans or worshipping Democrats. A black person is free by birth and

can be more mentally aware by independently finding solutions without party genuflection. That is why public help and private help can solve problems in America (like good
nutrition, a support system, positive adult supervision, mentors, a strong educational apparatus, community building, etc.). Runaway Slave talks about educational choice. On the other hand, the documentary wants to cripple public education, which will not create true educational choice. Real educational choice is allowing full, functional, and growing public and private schools to exist (or to allow parents to make decisions and to allow the system protect public education at the same time). They talk about abortion, which I have no issue with. I reject abortion on demand& infanticide. Yet, I believe in helping a baby when it's inside and outside of the mother's womb. Some Republicans reject any public money for child care, educational services, and other avenues of assistance to women. Using public money to help mothers and their newborns is great.

Many reactionaries use the arguments from Daniel Patrick Moynihan as an excuse to promote the lie that culture (specifically black culture) is the major reason for poverty in America. Moynihan wrote his report called "The Negro Family" in 1965 in which he blamed the black family and black culture as the primary reasons for the poverty conditions among many African Americans. This is false since the report omits the economic inequalities, racism, etc. that play a big role in poverty. Daniel blamed the victim instead of the system for poverty in the first place. The reactionaries cry about affirmative action when mostly white women benefit from it (and some parts of affirmative action have been effective in giving minorities educational and occupational opportunities). White quotas like legacies, grandfather clauses, and Jim Crow allowed rich white males to have huge opportunities at a whim. The documentary doesnt discuss them and I know why. You know why too. The scholar and sociologist Dr. Stephen Steinberg wrote an excellent article proving that socioeconomic factors have a major role in the poverty in America (in the article entitled, "Poor Reason: Culture Still Doesn't Explain Poverty"). The reactionaries bash culture as a means to ignore America's racial history (and to deny white supremacy as a serious factor on why many st people of color suffer oppression even in the 21 century). America is responsible for slavery

and Jim Crow. Also, even single poor families had support systems to assist children back in the 1970's. So, the argument of Daniel P. Moynihan (and even black reactionaries) is that black single female households are one of the biggest reasons for the bad conditions among some poor African Americans. I do agree that the black father should have a big role in the lives of a family. As Cornell West wrote in the 1980's:
"...My aim is not to provide excuses for black behavior or to absolve blacks of personal responsibility. But when the new black conservatives accent black behavior and responsibility in such a way that the cultural realities of black people are ignored, they are playing 'a deceptive and dangerous intellectual game with the lives and fortunes of disadvantaged people. We indeed must criticize and condemn immoral acts of black people, but we must do so cognizant of the circumstances into which people are born and under which they live. By overlooking this, the new black conservatives fall into the trap of blaming black poor people for their predicament. The ideological blinders of the new black conservatives are clearly evident in their attempt to link the moral breakdown of poor black communities to the expansion of the welfare state. For them, the only structural element of political-economic life relevant to the plight of the black poor is the negative role of the state and the positive role of the market. An appropriate question to these descendants of slaves sold at the auction block is, Can the market do any wrong?They claim that transfer payments to the black needy engender a mentality of dependence which undercuts the values of selfreliance and the solidity of the black poor family. The new black conservatives fail to see that the welfare state was the historic compromise between progressive forces seeking broad subsistence rights and conservative forces arguing for unregulated markets. Therefore it should come as no surprise that the welfare state possesses many flaws. I do believe that the reinforcing of "dependent mentalities" and the undermining of the family are two such flaws. But simply to point out these rather obvious shortcomings does not justify cutbacks in the welfare state. In the face of high black unemployment, these cutbacks will not promote self-reliance or strong black families but will only produce even more black cultural disorientation and more devastated black households...." (Unmasking Black Conservatives from 1986). That is very important, but single parent households are not the major reason of America's crime. There has been an increase of single parent household from 1970 to 1992. Yet, the crime rate has decreased from 1970 to the present. The reality is that the black fathers should be respected. Although, crime and poverty in our communities are primarily caused by socioeconomic conditions, economic inequality, unemployment, underemployment, income problems, lack of housing, bad health care, and educational problems (not black single mothers). To assume that all single families are this monolithic block of producing only struggling children is an old canard. Moynihan believed that the poor were victims of their own vices, which ignores political and

economic institutions that caused the terrible conditions in the ghetto in the first place. Even

Adolph Reed said that poverty has to be solved not by blaming the victims for everything, but to advocate decent jobs, adequate housing, and egalitarian education. You will

notice that the anti-poor crowd refuse to advocate real solutions like restoring the safety net, resurrecting real affirmation action, having modern-day cosmopolitan public housing, rescinding mandatory sentencing, ending the war on Drugs, enforcing anti-discrimination laws, and creating job programs to help the poor. The enemy just wants to blame the victim. So, the 1965 report was a racist report in blaming the victims of oppression instead of the oppressor (which is white supmemacy and its system of racism against human beings). Not to mention that pro-life individuals are from across the political spectrum. No pro-life person of any color should be forced to be a Republican for the sake of political expediency. They can talk about in 1960 when there was more 2 parent households. Yet, in 1960's, we had a large number of lynchings in the USA, discrimination, woman not even paid the same wage as men, murders of innocent black people by white, racist thugs, violations of our free speech rights, and other restrictions to our humanity. I don't want to revert to the time of Jim Crow segregation. I don't want to return to a time where I can't eat in whatever place I want and I can't go to a certain location based on my skin color. I don't want to revert to a time where a person of another background was forced into the shadows & closets of society (with authoritarian, draconian restrictions of human sexuality). No one should be ashamed of being different. It is a sin to denigrate a neighbor if they are different.That is not what really America should be all about. True Americans respect the diversity of humanity. Now, we have problems and we should have more 2 parent households (about 70 percent have no 2 parent household not 90 percent as the film claims). Still, we should never revert to a time of oppression in America. I don't want the nuclear family destroyed either, but I don't want privatization to harm our environment. Austerity as Runway Slave promotes will harm the community than help. You will notice that the Runaway Slave documentary wants blacks to be mental slaves under the Republican Party (with their Southern Strategy rhetoric). Glen Beck calls all liberals communists and Rush Limbaugh has spewed his deception before too. These are the people that some black conservatives (not all of them) love to follow. It doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Why does the film refuse to promote civil liberties, labor rights, and

opposition to the war on terror? We know the reason. The New Deal and the Great Society programs caused the redistribution of wealth. The super rich elite hated this and use policies now to try to end the social safety net as we know it. What people like CL Bryant don't realize is that their economic policies are the same policies supported by the wealthy class, not the people. We support the people not the 1 percent (with their CIA killing people all across the world, especially against people of color). Cultural improvements
(like the growth of black families, the rejection of any form of degradation of black people, and the fight against poverty) are necessary in any community, but not only that. There needs to be a redistribution of economic and political power to help all people as Dr. Martin Luther King had spoken about. Many of the segregrationist Democrats are now Republicans today. The film won't expose white supremacism and real racism in society. You can never have a real society until you defeat white supremacy. The film won't even talk about the Third World being oppressed by Western imperialists. As West said: "...The need of black conservatives to gain the respect of their white peers deeply shapes certain elements of their conservatism. In this regard, they simply want what most people want, to be judged by the quality of their skills, not by the color of their skin. But the black conservatives overlook the fact that affirmative action policies were political responses to the pervasive refusal of most white Americans to judge black Americans on that basis." Cornel West, Race Matters Martin Luther King III said, "It is disingenuous to imply that my father was a Republican. He never endorsed any presidential candidate, and there is certainly no evidence that he ever even voted for a Republican. It is even more outrageous to suggest that he would support the Republican Party of today, which has spent so much time and effort trying to suppress African-American votes in Florida and many other states."

THE DOCUMENTARY REJECTS THE CALL FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE FOR ALL HUMAN BEINGS. THIS IS ONE PART OF THE SOCIAL JUSTICE STRUGGLE. EVERY INDUSTRALIZED NATION HAS UNIVERSAL HEALTH FOR PEOPLE (like in Scandinavia with its social democratic principles) EXCEPT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Democracy is not simply a matter of majority approval or even majority vote. Democratic values have to be upheld, sometimes without the support of the majority. All political figures (whether that person is liberal or conservative) should have their feet held unto the fire. The abolitionists had to put President Abraham Lincolns feet to the fire. We dont need a plutocracy where the poor and suffering are told to get up by their bootstraps and rely on nothing but charity. We are better than that. Nobody is an island. There should be accountability for the super-rich. Unfairness exists in society. Yet, that doesnt mean that we cant fight against it. People have fought against it from the leaders in the American Revolution to the leaders of the Civil Rights Movement. We should never adjust to ally with oppression. We should abolish injustice, oppression, and discrimination from the face of the Earth. You will notice that the enemy will classify any governmental program in the USA as socialism when it isnt. The Tea Party wants to cut government spending radically and shrink the size of government radically. The government should be more efficient and eliminated of waste. Yet, legitimate governmental programs ought not to be gone since this policy will cut jobs from people of color and shrink the black middle class (that grew greatly after the Civil Rights Movement, which reactionaries fought against in the first place). After the Southern Strategy, the neo-Confederates switched to the Republican Party. WE HATE OLIGARCHY AND EMPIRE. The Koch brothers, Dick Armeys Freedom Works, and other elitists fund the mainstream Tea Party movement not ordinary citizens. They use this austerity rhetoric as a means to enhance oligarchy not freedom.

In life, you will always encounter the post-racial types & the racists that use certain arguments in trying to justify their world views. People have mentioned their agenda for years. Today, they issue their talking points. One is that blacks are just as racists as white or even more so. That's a lie, because black people never kidnapped millions of white people at gunpoint and sold them into slavery, never wiped out mass groups of people on three continents plus taken their lands, never raped so many white women that most white are now part black, never created a racist standard of beauty in the world (via the mainstream fashion and the mainstream film industries), and never organized other genocidal atrocities killing millions of human beings. Therefore, black people aren't the most racist people on Earth period. Black people have every justification to defeat white supremacy period. The white supremacists use black crime statistics (sometimes they distort these stats) as an excuse to believe in the lie of black inferiority. The reality is that these bigots forget that crime is universally done by people of every background. In America, most crimes are done by white people not black people. Also, sometimes high black crimes are a product of the drug trade, racist policemen, bad policing, racial profiling, and socioeconomic factors (not because of black inferiority). The reactionaries and the racists will not show statistics of the identity of the most of the serial killers, mass shooters, financial crimes, collusion, domestic violence, imperialism, etc. in the world. We know the identity. White racists use FBI crime statistics as an excuse to believe in the lie of something genetically wrong with black people, while making excuses for the same stats on why whites commit more crimes in hate crimes, etc. (which they classify white crime as an individual flaw). Most crimes in America are done intraracially (or among the same race). This doesn't mean that people of color should do criminal acts or we should omit problems in the black community. It does mean that black people aren't inherently inferior and we deserve justice. There is no such thing as reverse racism. Racism is racism. The Bell Curve has been refuted to, because the Flynn Effect allows IQ rates to rise many percentage points per decade (among all human beings), human beings across backgrounds achieve great intellectual achievements, and there is equality in the human race.

Once again, Alex Jones sold out by interviewing a neo-con extremist named Dinesh D'Souza. This proves that he isn't outside of the Left/Right paradigm, but he's in it. He has more in common to the Tea Party Republicans than it is assumed. Alex Jones hates the President so much that he wants to interview a Republican puppet like Dinesh. I researched heavily about this man Dinesh D'Souza recently. I know a lot about him. His Obama 2016 film is about disinformation period. I knew I would expose Dinesh soon. He

has been in the media a lot recently. He's another Michelle Malkin. He claims to be above culturally and intelligently other minorities, but even he submits under a system of white supremacy. Dinesh loves the corporate media and white American supremacy has made him rich. Dinesh ignores the oppression that black people suffer daily and that is why he made a book years in trying to deny the massive racism perpetrated against black people. The Indian born D'Souza comes from a nation that experienced imperialism by criminals. That nation has a history of discriminating against people with a darker skin complexion via the immoral, illogical caste system. Still, D'Souza loves to promote reactionary propaganda and imperialism overseas. His book called "The Enemy at Home: The Cultural Left and Its Responsibility for 9/11." tries to blame the cultural left for causing 9/11. This is extremely ignorant garbage, but Alex Jones allowed this man to spew his vile propaganda on his show. The truth is that the American left or any legitimate political ideology has nothing to do with 9/11. 9/11 was caused by a bunch of extremists and murderers. These murderers have been exploited by the military industrial complex as a means for this complex to promote immoral wars of aggression (plus further corporate plunder of certain countries' resources). He supported the Bush administration. The Mormon Glen Beck loves Dinesh D'Souza. Even Daniel Larison of the American Conservative called Dinesh's claims about Obama as ridiculous. Now, Dinesh's 2016 film said that the President wants some anti-colonial revenge as a motivation for his political policies. He used the racist opinion that Obama embraces some tribal anticolonial mentality. Frankly, what is wrong with anti-colonialism? The answer is nothing. The reason is that anti-colonialism is the opposition of imperialist raiders or criminals plundering the wealth and resources of the Third World primarily. The anti-colonial doctrine teaches that the actions of imperialism by Western reactionary forces was unwarranted and wrong period. That isn't controversial nor hateful. It's a fact. Today, reactionaries like Dinesh D'Souza (whose ancestors were the victims of colonialism and imperialism ironically enough) supports Manifest destiny, free markets, the superiority of Western culture, and American exceptionalism. Manifest Destiny in America revolved around the theft, genocide, and murder of indigenous peoples spanning long centuries (under the exploitation of the name of the Most High God). Even early American anti-colonialists rebelled against British colonialism. Barack Obama isn't the radical as neo-con token puppets like Dinesh describe him as. The reason is that the President rejected the public option in the new health care law, he agrees with some strip mining, he agrees with some nuclear power development, and he executed attacks against nations globally via military drone attacks. Dinesh may think that he lives in the BIG HOUSE, BUT HE LIVES IN THE

MASTERS SUBORDINATE QUARTERS PSYCHOLOGICALLY (IN MY OPINION OF COURSE. He loves to follow his Masters political agenda quick or fast, faithfully, and in a hurry. LOL). White imperialistic thinkers like Gingrich ignore that tribal thinking is complex
and that tribal peoples aren't directly influencing the President's decision making at all. There is no evidence that Barack Obama's worldview is "Kenyan anti-colonialism." In fact, the American Empire has increased under President Barack Obama. As human beings, we have the right to disagree with U.S. imperialist policies. Dinesh even hates people like Tim Wise who admits that white supremacy is a serious problem in the world that must be addressed. Dinesh's racism isn't limited to the President. In his 1995 book entitled, "The End of Racism," he said that enslaved black people were just treated like property and that segregation was meant to protect blacks (this is a lie since Jim Crow segregation was meant to oppress and even kill black people period). He made the racist view that black people suffer from a civilizational deficit or that black people aren't civilized in Western society naturally. Now, Dinesh D'Souza is trying to get people to vote for Romney when both candidates are puppets of the same Left/Right Paradigm. Another important question is why does Dinesh D'Souza seem to advocate colonialism when colonialism murdered millions of human beings worldwide (including some of his own ethnic group)? Even Gutfeld claims that all policies from the Democrats want to infantilize an entire race and make them addicted to programs. Only 1.2 percent of the adult black population receives cash welfare. Gutfeld's views represent nonsense, because many programs like the GI Bill, FHA loans, and Social Security aren't handouts, but they enrich American society daily. To assume that black people are so weak to be infantilized by a political party is foolishness because back people survived the Middle Passage (or the Maafa), enslavement, debt peonage, Jim Crow, lynching, etc. without an infantilized mentality at all (when certain Europeans experienced a greater safety net than black people). One of the biggest myths of white supremacy is the bootstrap myth. This bootstrap myth means that the poor or suffering should just get up by their own bootstraps and succeed without any public or nearly no

private assistance at all. This lie also says that anyone with hard work and clean living can be rich or successful in a short period of time. Many racists use this idea as an excuse to promote the lie that American society is currently fair and that racism is dead. These racists talk about the Jewish people, the Asians, and the Irish, yet blacks have done the same things as these ethnic groups. These ethnic groups never suffered the massive institutional discrimination on a high level before in America as black Americans have. Although, black people are just as much victims of white supremacy as all people of color are. People of color (and all people in the human race) aren't our enemy. The corrupt, bigoted system is the enemy. Although, as a black man, I do place black women highly on a pedestal. A black woman birthed me, so the black sisters are always Queens in my mind and in my heart. The Homestead Act, the grants, grandfather clauses, etc. refute the bootstrap lie completely, because these policies allowed tons of certain Americans to achieve their livelihoods (via government programs beyond just individual initiative). Working hard and staying clean doesn't necessarily mean you will live in a middle class neighborhood or be super rich. There is nothing wrong with living clean and being moral, so I want to be clear on that point. The bootstrap myth (it is myth since much of American society was built on the theft of land and the exploitation of Native Americans and African Americans) was created by certain white people in America an excuse to excuse their racist mindset. If the bootstrap philosophy was real, then the working poor (filled with intelligent, strong, morally potent, and upright people) wouldn't exist in America today. You can't tell a person get up by their own bootstraps when they have no boots to being with. You have to give a man some boots first. In my opinion, these boots are programs and public opportunities. This is why today people are working their tails off and still receive low income. You have record income inequality here in America. Some folks are forced to have a 2nd job to make ends meet. What is amazing is that in less than 50 years after Jim Crow, black Americans have billions of dollars worth of income, are architects, engineers, teachers, lawyers, athletes, journalists, speakers, theologians, plumbers, mechanical workers, librarians, musicians, and tons of other contributing members to society. This proves that black people have beaten the odds with the Promised Land still not with us yet. The truth is that any human can succeed in life, but we ought to make this more of a reality by a radical redistribution of economic & political power. That means that private and government actions are necessary in order to give the poor & minorities opportunities to fulfill their own dreams and aspirations. These pro-bootstraps so-called "apple pie eating, superiority complex having, all American heroes" types keep on lying to believe that they didn't receive help to get what they got. All humans received help or assistance one way or another in their lives. Since the enemy has no empathy or conscience, we shouldnt be nihilistic. Although, we shouldnt be nave either. Our eyes ought to be wide open with empathy and compassion to the human race.

Dr. Martin Luther King preached a sermon (entitled, Remaining Awake Through a Great Revolution) from March 31, 1968, which was delivered at the National Cathedral, inside of Washington, D.C. This speech was delivered days before he died. These are some of his last words on issues like refuting the bootstraps lie. Here are some excerpts from the great sermon: Somewhere we must come to see that human progress never rolls in on the wheels of inevitability. It comes through the tireless efforts and the persistent work of dedicated individuals who are willing to be co-workers with God. And without this hard work, time itself becomes an ally of the primitive forces of social stagnation. So we must help time and realize that the time is always ripe to do right. Now there is another myth that still gets around: it is a kind of over reliance on the bootstrap philosophy. There are those who still feel that if the Negro is to rise out of poverty, if the Negro is to rise out of the slum conditions, if he is to rise out of discrimination and segregation, he must do it all by himself. And so they say the Negro must lift himself by his own bootstraps. They never stop to realize that no other ethnic group has been a slave on American soil. The people who say this never stop to realize that the nation made the black mans color a stigma. But beyond this they never stop to realize the debt that they owe a people who were kept in slavery two hundred and forty-four years. In 1863 the Negro was told that he was free as a result of the Emancipation Proclamation being signed by Abraham Lincoln. But he was not given any land to make that freedom meaningful. It was something like keeping a person in prison for a number of years and suddenly discovering that that person is not guilty of

the crime for which he was convicted. And you just go up to him and say, "Now you are free," but you dont give him any bus fare to get to town. You dont give him any money to get some clothes to put on his back or to get on his feet again in life. Every court of jurisprudence would rise up against this, and yet this is the very thing that our nation did to the black man. It simply said, "Youre free," and it left him there penniless, illiterate, not knowing what to do. And the irony of it all is that at the same time the nation failed to do anything for the black man, though an act of Congress was giving away millions of acres of land in the West and the Midwest. Which meant that it was willing to undergird its white peasants from Europe with an economic floor. But not only did it give the land, it built land-grant colleges to teach them how to farm. Not only that, it provided county agents to further their expertise in farming; not only that, as the years unfolded it provided low interest rates so that they could mechanize their farms. And to this day thousands of these very persons are receiving millions of dollars in federal subsidies every years not to farm. And these are so often the very people who tell Negroes that they must lift themselves by their own bootstraps. Its all right to tell a man to lift himself by his own bootstraps, but it is a cruel jest to say to a bootless man that he ought to lift himself by his own bootstraps. We must come to see that the roots of racism are very deep in our country, and there must be something positive and massive in order to get rid of all the effects of racism and the tragedies of racial injustice. There is another thing closely related to racism that I would like to mention as another challenge. We are challenged to rid our nation and the world of poverty. Like a monstrous octopus, poverty spreads its nagging, prehensile tentacles into hamlets and villages all over our world. Two-thirds of the people of the world go to bed hungry tonight. They are ill-housed; they are ill-nourished; they are shabbily clad. Ive seen it in Latin America; Ive seen it in Africa; Ive seen this poverty in Asia I am convinced that it is one of the most unjust wars that has ever been fought in the history of the world. Our involvement in the war in Vietnam has torn up the Geneva Accord. It has strengthened the military-industrial complex; it has strengthened the forces of reaction in our nation. It has put us against the self-determination of a vast majority of the Vietnamese people, and put us in the position of protecting a corrupt regime that is stacked against the poor. It has played havoc with our domestic destinies. This day we are spending five hundred thousand dollars to kill every Vietcong soldier. Every time we kill one we spend about five hundred thousand dollars while we spend only fifty-three dollars a year for every person characterized as poverty-stricken in the so-called poverty program, which is not even a good skirmish against poverty. Not only that, it has put us in a position of appearing to the world as an arrogant nation. And here we are ten thousand miles away from home fighting for the so-called freedom of the Vietnamese people when we have not even put our own house in order. And we force young black men and young white men to fight and kill in brutal solidarity. Yet when they come back home that cant hardly live on the same block together. The judgment of God is upon us today. And we could go right down the line and see that something must be doneand something must be done quickly. We have alienated ourselves from other nations so we end up morally and politically isolated in the world. There is not a single major ally of the United States of America that would dare send a troop to Vietnam, and so the only friends that we have now are a few client-nations like Taiwan, Thailand, South Korea, and a few others. This is where we are. "Mankind must put an end to war or war will put an end to mankind," and the best way to start is to put an end to war in Vietnam, because if it continues, we will inevitably come to the point of confronting China which could lead the whole world to nuclear annihilation With this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair the stone of hope. With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. Thank God for John, who centuries ago out on a lonely, obscure island called Patmos caught vision of a new Jerusalem descending out of heaven from God, who heard a voice saying, "Behold, I make all things new; former things are passed away." God grant that we will be participants in this newness and this magnificent development. If we will but do

it, we will bring about a new day of justice and brotherhood and peace. And that day the morning stars will sing together and the sons of God will shout for joy. God bless you Some people try to minimize racism in society. Not to mention that many white racists are getting bold. One of them named Josh Jambon (or a Romney supporter. This doesnt have to do with Romney, but a single bigot) spit on and used a slur against the beautiful black sister named Brandi Worley (a debris accessor trying to clean up areas after a Hurricane came). Worleys coworkers were hit by the man. Josh Jambon was lucky that I wasnt there. If I was there, well, you know the rest. My hand speed is very fast. I mean very fast. Josh Jambon acted like a devil and he should be punished for his crimes. Jambon is representative of the irrational, reactionary extremists in American society.

CONSERVATIVES IN THIS NEW GENERATION There is a new generation of conservatives. Tara Wall is a conservative Republican working for the Mitt Romney Presidential campaign. In Romney's mind, this represents inclusiveness. Tara Wall is the senior communications adviser for Mitt Romney's campaign. Tara Wall was a former news cater and senior adviser to former President George W. Bush. She works as a conservative columnist and deputy editorial page editor for the Washington Times. Wall wants to convince people like me (who is a brother) that we need to vote for the Mormon Mitt Romney. The Mormon Mitt Romney is something else. Mrs. Wall desires to communicate her message to appeal to Americans that want to see changes to our economic condition. One problem is that massive obstructionism by the GOP in Congress prevented some necessary, comprehensive economic reforms to transpire in America. Mitt Romney refuses to publicly disagree with Donald Trump's view that President Barack Obama wasn't born in America. Romney expressed anti-poor rhetoric before as well. Trump is a birther through and through. Romney won't repudiate the evil words from Trump since he wants that Klan demographic to vote for him. Tara Wall is a very accomplished person. I respect anyone as a human being. People have the right to believe in whatever political philosophy that they desire without ridicule or unfair marginalization. It is just as wrong to stereotype all black conservatives as it is to stereotype all black liberals. Personally, I am a black independent person ideologically. Yet, Wall should realize that Austrian economics and war mongering against Iran don't benefit us as a people or Americans at all. These ideas are Mitt Romney's

goals among others. It took progressive effort to extend rights to minorities, women, and other groups of people. Romney refuse to expose the Drug War, the prison industrial complex, income inequality, the war on terror, the Bilderberg Group, and other real issues involving my community. Mia Love is a part of the new generation of conservatives. She lives in Utah. Of course she said that her father said to her to not take welfare or be a burden to society. This is code and we know what that coded language is all about. Now, people sacrificed during the civil rights movement, so people like Mia Love could reap the benefits of society today. Just because a person takes welfare, doesn't mean that person is a leech. So, we don't make it own our own as social Darwinists subscribe to. She claims that she didn't felt "accepted" until she moved into Utah (yes, Mia Love is a black American Mormon person) despite being from Brooklyn. I know what that comment means. The truth is that real black people live in the urban and rural areas (you can be accepted in Brooklyn since Brooklyn has many progressive, real people. A subtle jab at blacks taking government assistance is very much ignorant thinking). We all have assistance in getting to our basic destination whether public or private. Mia Love said that it's not the government's responsibility to help society, but it's the people. The refutation of that assumption is that the people are made up of the government. The government is by and for the people, so the people and the government are inseparable. Too much small government means that people are going to lose their jobs. Yet, the conservatives are right that the government isn't perfect. Therefore, we have the right to criticize the government when it acts inappropriately and we have the right to call for reforms to improve the government as well. The government ought to be made accountable for its actions. Its just that the government and the private sector both have made great improvements in the conditions of our society. The government cant solve all problems in the Universe, but it can be part of the overall solution to our complications. Mia Love wants to get rid of the EPA. Mia Love should be respected for her accomplishments, but she needs to realize that even she had to get help even from the government to achieve her goals. Lt. Col. West is silly liar since he tries to demonize people that disagree with him as a communist or Marxist. Too many black conservatives can't speak about issues without belittling their own people (even in indirect, disgusting terms). I have more respect for Mia Love and Tara Wall than Lt. Col. West though, because at least with Mia Love and Tara Wall, you can have a basically tolerant discussion. With people like West and Jesse Lee Peterson, it's like talking to extremely brainwashed people. I dont believe that raising one cent of tax is a sin.

*Now in this generation, some people in Youtube still want to believe in deception. They deny the criminal actions of the Reagan administration. Reagan funded reactionary, totalitarian governments in the world. It is true that many people in Eastern Europe fought for liberation, but the Cold War ended by a multiplicity of reasons not just the efforts of one President. They try to equate atheistic communism to heroes, but cartel capitalism killed millions of people in the slave trade and in the extermination of Native Americans in the Western Hemisphere. It has killed others in the lands throughout the Earth from Vietnam to Latin America. The truth is not found universally in worshipping Capitalism nor worshipping Communism, but its found in freedom, justice, and equality. They exploit the real imperfections of the current administration as an excuse to promote the lie that the current President is a socialist or he has nothing to show (when President Barack Obama passed a farm bill to help Black Americans via $1.2 billion and Native Americans, he funded HBCUs, he passed a health care bill with some good parts in it [along with imperfections], and he passed the Fair Sentencing Act). I dont agree with the President on some issues and I think his foreign policy agenda is too reactionary or immoral (as I feel that President Barack Obama has the interests of Wall Street influence his Presidency to a great degree), but its a lie to say that the President has nothing to show. Another ad hominem attack that the extremists use is that people who disagree with a reactionary agenda lacks intelligence. The reality is that all human beings has worth and value. The truth is that civil liberties are important to preserve, that the same old trickled down economic philosophy will never radically decrease the poverty rate, and being a progressive thinking human being is no vice. Also, they say that the poor dont need help. Thats a cruel lie for all humans need help one way or another. The poor need help to achieve employment and its done by public and private efforts not a laissez faire approach. Also, jobs, education, and other acts are part of help that can assist the poor. Only a minority of human beings are abusing the welfare system. Its just that the extremists exploit the acts of a few to demonize collectively those who live in poverty. The vast majority of the poor arent in jail, they arent murderers mostly, and they arent rapists mostly. The extremists love to

obsess with the Constitution, but ignore it when it talks about the government promoting the general welfare of the people or allowing the government to fund roads, science, and create taxes (as found in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution). The reactionaries ignore the social democratic nations of Europe with a high HDI, a powerful educational system, strong health, and other amenities in some cases better than America. The liars ignore the crimes of some corporations and ignore the need for reforms of our economic unequal system. The status quo doesnt work, but a radical changing of power is necessary to see a real revolution of values. The reactionaries have tried to censor my words in the

Internet, but their tactics wont work, because the truth will persist forever. Efficient (not corrupt) government can work to cause more peace and freedom. The government should be of the people not of the select few.

Arthur Davis was a former Alabama Congressman. He failed to be governor of his home state of Alabama. Now, he will leave the Democratic Party and come into be a part of the Republican Party in my home state of Virginia. He said that the country is drifting. Yes, it is. The nation is moving in a more progressive direction. We cant deprive people of rights or execute policies that violate our civil liberties anymore without responses. He didnt agree with the health care reform law as being unsustainable financially and is too experimental and bureaucratic. Davis is wrong to even defend the oppressive voter ID laws. The truth is that even innocent people like a WWII veteran and an elderly person were falsely placed on a voter purge roll. Davis sent money to the campaigns launched by Republicans Heather Wilson and Phil Bryant. Davis has chosen his side. For years, Republicans collectively (there are exceptions of course) voted against the Black Farmers Bill, voted against Affirmation Act, support the unfair prison system, and some of them blatantly support white reactionary radicals like Rush Limbaugh, Glen Beck, Ted Nugent, and others of that ilk or clan. I mean clan, get it. The Republicans love to be in a certain special, exclusive type of clan. LOL. It is ironic that many people like JC Watts and Steele were initially accepted by the Republican leadership. Later, they were rejected by many in their own party. Mr. Davis view on health care and Voter ID are reactionary positions. I believe that universal health is great and the voter ID laws are a violation of fundamental voting rights indeed. Arthur Davis now is

supporting the Tea Party publicly. I will never do that, because that isnt my thing. I like the jumbo pot of reality not the stale pot of fantasy.
Arthur Davis has the right to believe in whatever philosophy that he chooses. Likewise, people have the right to critique his ideologies. In laymen terms: SOME FOLKS MAY ACT LIKE THEY ARRIVED HOME IN A SO-CALLED ACCEPTABLE PLACE, BUT THAT PLACE ISNT THEIR TRUE HOME. IF YOU WANT TO GO HOME, GO AND HAVE COMMADERIE WITH YOUR PEOPLE AND LOVE THE MOTHERLAND. THE MOTHERLAND IS HOME. THATS HOME. WHEN WE PASS AWAY, OUR HOME WILL BE IN HEAVEN (IF WE FOLLOW THE LORDS WILL). Its also our job to be the

change in our communities too. The President isnt a god (I dont agree with him on every issue), but its our responsibility to at least fight for reforms, fight against police brutality, promote civil liberties, talk to people and work with programs to help our people in our own areas. So, we shouldnt just write about it, we should speak up about it and do something about it in our country as men and as women. Other black conservatives in this new generation include Kira Davis and a male named Zo Rachel.

Extra Jewels It's a new time. Many people feel as those that black conservatives are unfairly demonized. Here is my perception on this issue. In recent months, I have received words from those who try to defend people like Herman Cain, Allen West, and others. The pattern I see from those who debate with me on this issue is that they are pro-Tea Party or pro-Republican. They feel that a black person courageously expressing their black identity or publicly being thankful of being black is equated to bigotry or racism. Nothing can be further from the truth. The truth is that cultural identity is real and tangible in our existence. Therefore, a black person has every right to promote Black Love, Black Unity, and Black Power. This call precisely relates to admiring our manhood or womanhood (for females) without expressing a harsh, denigrating interpretation of non-blacks collectively. It's really pernicious for Arizona to deny courses that teach about different cultures. It's pernicious for the War on Drugs and the prison industrial complex to persist. It's definitely pernicious to witness folks using religious texts (with excellent historical values) as an excuse to advance discriminatory & divisive policies in the world. Now, the reactionaries are right that not all black conservatives are monolithic. Historically, black people from across the political spectrum have expressed legitimate love for

their identity, a sense of fighting for justice, and a great sense of intellectual, social aptitude. The reactionaries are wrong in desiring black people to be Republicans or mainstream conservatives on every issue to prove our submission in society. See, they or the enemy don't desire liberation. They use the imperfections of numerous Democrats as an excuse to try to con well meaning black people to accept their way of life (that deemphasizes Black Power and emphasize colorblindness and a denial of white supremacy). Far too often, some black conservatives try to promote the falsehoods of massive black institutional racism and massive white victimization (on par with black oppression) as an excuse to blame the victim instead of the oppressors. This is designed as Black Sister Pam wrote as a means to portray white people as the only one meriting empathy, sympathy, and assistance. This anti-blackness mentality is embraced even by some black people (who are white supremacist-identified blacks, blacks who are self hating and confused). Meanwhile, many poor people, especially in some of the poorest areas of America vote for Tea Party Republicans which is against their own interests. Therefore, I am pro-black and I respect myself. See, white supremacy is real in the world as expressed in the war on terror, false beauty standards, stereotypes, and other crimes in the world. The reactionary denies white supremacy since they deny racism being a serious problem in the world today. They obsess with liberals since they see politics in monochromatic lenses. The reality is that a person wanting economic inequality to end, wanting justice for the poor, and loving to see peace without unjust wars is a person enlightened. It's not about left vs. right. It's about right vs. wrong. I don't believe in being extremely judgmental against a black person that is conservative. I do believe that all people, regardless of political affiliation, deserve a legitimate critique of their views. I don't believe that a sincere conservative that loves his own people is lacking in blackness. I do believe that a person like Jesse Lee Peterson is a traitor since he praises the Maafa that harmed unjustly black people, he slandered the victims of Hurricane Katrina, and he made other outrageous comments as well. I say it to his face like a man. Blackness isn't defined by political affiliation. Yet, being black truly is a person that has undying love and commitment to help out their own black people (and that recognizes his or her own great culture, history, legacy, and ancestors) as Kwame Ture said. We who are black must have an undying love for our people. That is truly why we shouldn't accept Republican talking points in order to blame the victims for all the circumstances of our daily ills. The oppressors uses the derivative crimes made by some of the victims as an excuse to escape their (or the oppressors') own responsibility.

Fundamentally, it is the oppressor not the victim that created a corrupt system harming the world today. A man shouldn't be called an Uncle Tom if they have love for their people sincerely and do something constructively to assist their people (whether they are liberal, conservative, moderate, independent, libertarian, etc.). A person should be called an Uncle Tom if they love slavery against blacks (like Jesse Lee Peterson), if they promote the bashing of black men and black women (like Manning), and if they agree to love a white supremacist system harming black people even in 2012. Jesse Lee Peterson made other ignorant statements like saying that the President Barack Obama hates white people and that women shouldn't be able to vote because they can't handle power. See, the

neo-con Sean Hannity doesn't reveal his comments publicly even though Peterson and Hannity are friends.
In our generation, we are calling these Uncle Toms out in Youtube like Pastor Manning, Jesse Lee Peterson (he thanked God for slavery and slandered the beautiful sister Michelle Obama in offensive terms. He criticized Michelle Obama doing pushups, but there is nothing wrong with a Sister doing push-ups at all. Jesse Lee Peterson recently said the lie that black people are destroying America collectively. He said that its not in the Presidents and his wifes DNA to be classy, which is a loud of nonsense. That alone makes this bootlicking traitor Jesse Lee Peterson something else. Peterson loves to shine his masters shoes metaphorically & literally, in that order. LOL. I called this Tom out since 2005), Allen West (who calls any liberal as a Communist. I am not a Democrat, but he is wrong to compare Democrats to Nazis and Communists), and the new guy Tommy Sotomayor (who disrespects black sisters. This House Negro must forgot that he came from a black woman). One person sent me a video of Juan Williams. Juan Williams isn't a conservative. I believe in political freedom (as bigotry, the muzzling of free speech, and hatred are found in both the Republicans and the Democrats). On the other hand, Juan made the mistake of disrespecting the First Lady. Now, the fiscal conservative crowd needs to realize that laissez faire economics doesn't work. We tried it in Chile and in other parts of the world. It only breeds oppression and not true economic justice. That system of economics causes more of the super rich to gain more wealth, while the poor has no real radical improvement in their socioeconomic disposition. This doesn't mean that the liberal establishment (called the foxes by the brother Malcolm X) is perfect. On many occasions, the liberal establishment presumes to be intellectually superior and tolerant. Although, they are some of the very ones that agree with the NATO war crimes in Libya (including other imperialist facets of the war on terror. The establishment liberals [as opposed to true progressives] are not saying one word on the black Libyans being tortured & killed by racist NATO-supported al-Qaeda related terrorists). Some of them refuse to expose Sangers once avocation of permits for parents and forced segregation plus sterilization of certain human beings because of their development. I am non integrative to oppression. I believe in separation from evil, while treating my neighbor as myself without malice or apprehension. I reject any form of forced segregation as Malcolm X said, but I believe in the growth of black communities in the world. I am color conscious and ethnocentric (as in believing in promoting the interests of my people without showing bigotry or unjust antagonism toward non-black human beings. Obviously, all men are created equal. No human being regardless of their color or background ought to be deprived of their human rights or treated less than a human being) as that is not a sin. It is not bigotry to say that. Why is it that black people (in many instances) are not even allowed to say publicly in mass that we want our own businesses, our own culture, we want more black families, and our own human legacies? See, the supremacists want to dominate our thinking and social consciousness, so they can rule our thinking. We as blacks have the right to promote our own thinking outside of the box without submitting to the machine. We are fighting for our humanity and our humanity is reflected in our great black skin color& cultural identity. It is from the Lord. Respecting my color without hatred is my God-given right as a human being. Therefore, the gauntlet has

been thrown. I submit to truth wholeheartedly. Also, having an education, having peace, getting a career, and striving to live a better life are better prescriptions for embracing a better social living than social nihilism.

The Aftermath of the 2012 Election

We live in a new political reality, because the GOP has reaped what it has sown. President Barack Obama won a second term. He won both more of the Electoral College and the popular vote. Ohio, Virginia, Florida, and New Hampshire were key states in giving the President the victory (including others like Wisconsin, New Mexico, and Colorado). The Senate gain more seats for the Democrats to be the most diverse Senate in American history. The Republicans maintain their majority in the House causing divided government. This is a historical time and it's a significantly watershed movement in American politics. The Democrats have more power politically and the Republicans are in the wilderness again seeking self-reflection. The demographics in America are changing. Most people who voted for the President and the Democrats are primarily women, African Americans, Hispanics, Asian Americans, young people under the age of 30, labor, and other groups. The reactionaries have to blame themselves, because they organized voter suppression efforts, lying ads, distractions, anti-poor scapegoating, and slander. All of these evil actions will result in a negative result, because most people rejected that form of deception. When some reactionaries now are advocating secession against America, you can tell that they hate America for real. At least activists like Dr. Martin Luther King or Fannie Lou Hamer didnt advocate secession. America is about diversity and for the human race to respect differences of all backgrounds. America isn't about unnecessary divisions and an embrace of intolerance. To assume when the government is promoting the general welfare of society to people is equivalent to Stalinist Communism is a total lie. We don't want the government to control all aspects of people's lives. That is not the name of the game. We just don't want reactionaries to eliminate necessary government programs that can help the human race in America. That's the real point. When these ignorant reactionaries call the President a Communist, they omit that the President issued a Wall Street bailout and praised the free enterprise system in public. Anyway, the Romney campaign failed. The Republican agenda of outlawing trade unions, depriving human rights, and using other methods as a means to try to harm other liberties have been thwarted for now. Romney's neocon foreign policy advisers are not going to be in the White House at all. The GOP's racist Southern Strategy has been defeated fully in 20012. They started it in 1968 after popular leaders were assassinated like John F. Kennedy, Dr. Martin Luther King, Robert Kennedy, Malcolm X, Medgar Evers, and others. Today, the GOP seeks to follow an extremist foreign policy that still believes in interventionism in an unjust fashion. They believe in the hysteria about false

flag terrorism and on economics. Now, in this age, the President can go to the path of revolutionary reform or the grand bargain of austerity including centrist, corporatist policies. The Democrats are divided into the populist wing and the more corporatist pro-Wall Street wing. Ironically, most Americans don't want massive cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid (and most Americans want increased taxes on the super wealthy). Therefore, both parties aren't perfect. We have the responsibility to fight for solutions and we should demand the government to be made accountable for its own actions.

The establishment neo-cons falsely believe that people like me accuse them of racism because of their critiques of President Barack Obama. That is wrong, because not all of their critiques are based on racism, but some reactionaries do criticize the President because they are racists. When some reactionaries falsely ascribe the President as being a Muslim Communist from Kenya, then that is rooted in bigotry or racism. Numerous human beings can have honest disagreements with the President on specific issues with reasoned, legitimate arguments. Yet, others have used a bias or bigotry in trying to slander the White House. I don't agree with that goal at all. Some in the Tea Party movement have gone overboard in critiquing White House policies. For example, some Tea Party protesters have shown signs of hate about the President during demonstrations across the nation. Judson Philips of Tea Party Nation in 2011 believes in the Birther theory or that the President was born in Africa (and used a falsified birth certificate as a means to be elected into the White House). Even Orly Taitz wanted armed rebellion against Obama. A 2011 New York Times/CBS poll shows that only 32 percent of likely GOP voters believe that Obama was likely born in America. About 17 percent of all Americans view Barack Obama as a secret Muslim. Rush Limbaugh made the racist remark that the President is behaving like an African colonial despot. This man has lies in his closet and he believes in the evil of the war on terror. Rush Limbaugh said that the Affordable Care Act was passed as a way to create reparations in America. I can show more examples too of these people. Mark Williams of the Tea Party movement said that the President Barack Obama is an Indonesian Muslim and welfare thug. Pam Geller accuses the administration of wanting Jewish human beings to get into the concentration camps and he called the President a Muhammedian President. See, I will show the truth about these extremists like God Almighty would want me to do. Geller was the human being that didn't want a mosque to be built in NYC, which is part of the First Amendment. Brent Bozell of the Media Research Media said that the President looks like a "skinny, ghetto crack head" in 2011 on FOX News. These words are very much evil and bigoted indeed. He won't go on MSNBC or CNN. These white racists like Bozell are getting bold. That is why I don't take these reactionaries seriously when they claim that they aren't extremists or racists. Trey Walker, an advisor to S.C. Attorney General Henry McMaster, made disparaging remarks about the beautiful Sister Michelle Obama. Glen Beck said that the New Black Panthers are Obama's new gang of thugs. Glen Beck is the punk that disrespected the President's children and was forced to apologize later on. Only a coward would mock a young girl. See, I can list more examples. I show these examples, because the neo-cons lie and claim that it is not racism as a motivation for their disagreements with President Barack Obama. If racism wasn't the motivation, then they need to explain the previous comments. Only a racist would make these comments. Only reactionaries and racists would defend the Mormon Glen Beck too. So, when neo cons lie and deny they there is no massive bigotry against White House, just show these facts to them. Yet, there is nothing wrong with legitimate criticisms about the White House that involves civil liberties, the war on terror, labor, the war on Drugs, the prison industrial complex, on his centrist economic agenda, on warrantless wiretapping, on FCC, on Africom, etc. On the other hand, human beings like Limbaugh or Beck go overboard indeed.

*Mitt Romneys recent comments about black people, Hispanic folks, women, and young people wanting gifts are wrong, bigoted, and evil. Its just like his 47 Percent comments. Even Governor Bobby Jindal opposed those comments. The truth is that the American people dont want to be lazy. Americans just want fairness and real opportunities, so society can grow. Romney is wrong to assume that the President won the election as a means to give people free stuff. His words are an example of sour grapes. Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare are programs that people earned. These programs are never free stuff at all. Romney expressed what he truly felt against the non-rich (when the super-rich received record bailouts. Romney wants tax cuts

for corporations, tax cuts for the super-rich, and slashing regulations. He ignores the fact that the government has every right to help people to receive health care, to get educational opportunities, and to protect the environment. These are investments that can benefit any nation). A man who once was involved with an outsourcing company like Bain Capital shouldnt lecture anyone on gifts. The election is over and we should move forward with our lives.

In colleges across the countries, there are many establishment conservatives and establishment liberals. Some of the establishment conservatives try to act like James O'Keefe. Some of the reactionaries even oppose efforts to have educational locations to advance racial equity or representation. This is done by using efforts at recruiting and retaining students of color. You have to have equal opportunity to all students, so students can thrive. There are still racial disparities in health, education, and other parameters of society. That is why racism and discrimination ought to be fought against at every turn. The disparities in income, wealth, education, etc. are inheritably racist period. White supremacy thrives on racism. So, we should eliminate biases, prejudices, and stereotypes completely from our thinking. For the truth is that no human is biologically or culturally inferior to another human being based on color or any background. Human beings have been disadvantaged by the evils in the current system in society. This doesn't mean that we have license to act as fools, fools, but we have the license to protest, use activism, and fight in constructive means to end discrimination and bigotry in the world society though. though America is not an equal opportunity society at this present moment, because we have social inequalities and injustices plaguing the landscape of world society not only inside of Western society. Human beings are people, but society is never in a vacuum. When you have human beings suffering in the world, we have the right to stop it even if it means that we utilize public or collective actions to do it not just individual actions. In other words, we can't treat human beings as abstractions removed from their social context and call that justice. We have to confront racism and any form of bigotry if we are to make an authentic freedom enriched world. Life is a complex experience. We can't be sheltered from reality. Now, in the early 1970's something happened. We know that the social programs under the Great Society brought down the poverty rates down by a third. Many of the Great Society programs were beginning to work before budgets was cut and the economy began to shift from manufacturing. The poverty rate plummeted especially in urban areas by about 38 percent from 1965 to 1973. By the mid 1970's, most of the innovative programs of the Great Society have been cut or eliminated. There was only cash assistance, which declined relative to inflation and never sufficient to pull human beings from poverty. Food stamps and limited housing support were main programs that allowed human beings in America to survive literally. Radical economic solutions now are restricted by the powers that be since they want the masses to survive excluding true prosperity or an end to poverty completely. In America during the 1950's and the 1960's, our tax rate was much higher than it is now both on individuals and companies. That time had far higher rates of investment than many nations in the world. Companies have been busting unions for years. Urban renewal programs of the 1960's were executed by reactionaries as a means to knocking down homes and businesses for interstates including office parks without massively helping poor human beings. In that time (in the early 1970s), there was a decline in production of labor among the manufacturing sector. There was a decline in the value of the real dollar. There was a decline of the real dollar value of social insurance

programs like the AFDC, Food Stamps, housing assistance, etc. These programs didn't keep pace with inflation after 1973. So, the total progress of America slowed down decades ago. Now, we have stagnant economic growth. We can see that the War on Drugs, urban renewal, and unfair home loans contributed greatly to the oppression in our world indeed in the USA. We want solutions. So, we can intensify affirmative action efforts to benefit humanity. We should fund money to train teachers in better using fair treatment among students and ban companies found guilty of discrimination from receiving public contracts of any kind. Also, it is just for a domestic Marshall Plan to build up poorer communities of every background. A change in public policy is great and we need to individually fight against evils via activism and education.
Bill O'Reilly is still trying to defend Mitt Romney's comments about free stuff. He is also defending his own comments that Americans voted against Romney, because they want more stuff or more things. He tries to say that real, traditional Americans voted mostly for Mitt Romney when just because you oppose the agenda of a flip flopper, doesn't mean you are not a real traditional American. For some, traditional Americans is code for older, more conservative Caucasians. The reality is that regular Americans exist in every color and every background (all of these human beings have value). Real Americans don't want more free stuff. We just want more freedom, justice, and equality. Bill O'Reilly is wrong since people from across the political spectrum believe in selfreliance, but most Americans don't believe in tax breaks for the super wealthy or a war mongering, neo-con foreign policy agenda. Most of us love personal responsibility, but we just reject intolerance and crony capitalism. Also, when Bill O'Reilly speaks of American exceptionalism, it is always linked to a false American superiority complex. The truth is that true Americans ought to be respected, but America is not God. America will never be God. Brothers and sisters have classified American exceptionalism as an extension of white supremacy. They are right, because American exceptionalism teaches the fiction that American culture is superior to all cultures and that America must dominate even the peoples of the world culturally. Readily, extremists utilize the concept of American exceptionalism as a sickening excuse to promote wars, invasions, thefts, genocides, etc. We can easily respect American heroes without embracing the ideal of American exceptionalism. O'Reilly ignores the fact that most black people don't take up welfare benefits at all. African Americans, women, Hispanics, the young, and others constantly fought to what they have earned all of the time with a lot of personal responsibility indeed. Now, we all know that FOX News shows propaganda and Bill O'Reilly is a very good deceiver. O'Reilly even slandered a son of a 9/11 victim (that just want to promote peace in the word. His name is Jeremy Glick) as unpatriotic or anti-American. The reactionaries are just angry that they have spent billions of dollars in the 2012 Presidential election. These billions of dollars were useless in the election since Mitt Romney wasn't elected President at all. Bill O'Reilly has said bigoted statements for years from the hubcaps comment to his words on other groups of people. Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, and even Bill Maher (with his Suge Knight comments) have made ignorant statements about my people before. I don't want to revert back to the bad old days when there was Jim Crow, suppression of human

rights, suppression of voting rights, and a draconian society at all. We are moving forward not backwards.

In Closing:

Lloyd Marcus is something else. He wrote a recent article in 2012 that promotes the Tea Party and other reactionary views. I disagree with him on many issues. He wants to acceptable to the Koch brothers funded Tea Party. I don't. On February 25, 2012, he tried to convince Christians to basically support the Republican Party (in claiming that allying with the Tea party is being on the Lord's side). I recall the Lord never telling us to vote for either party unconditionally at all. He wants to appeal to Christians, yet real Christians already realize that we are a war. Traditional values deal with tolerance, love for

humanity in every background, fighting against corporate corruption, and opposition to unjust wars. Some of these values are opposed by Lloyd. No one denies many Christians in early
America. Real Christians just believe that numerous Founding Fathers were occultists and expressed hatred of Christianity in general like Thomas Paine and Thomas Jefferson. I refuse to bow down and keep the feet of slave traders even if some of them possess great intellectual curiosity (and great thinking capacities). I don't seek a godless society, but the church has no right to dominate all human beings in a theocratic system. The separation of church and state is paramount in our culture for a reason. Lloyd Marcus lies to assume that real people concerned with economic inequality hate the rich. We don't hate the rich. We hate corruption and criminal acts performed by the Wall Street elite. Even the super rich like Warren Buffet admitted that his class has won the class war and that the super rich aren't paying their fair share of taxes. Promoting black power isn't racism as Lloyd lies about. My loyalty to my people isn't the sin of idolatry (as Lloyd Marcus mentioned); it's the blessing of common sense. Also, Lloyd Marcus doesnt want to have loyalty and respect to his skin color, because he believes in colorblindness. There is nothing wrong for a Christian to act as the salt, but the truth is that helping your family and your people is a great duty to perform. I am not a war with the church of liberalism as Lloyd Marcus says. Liberalism like all political philosophies has imperfections, but I am at war with oppression and evil. I don't agree with banning prayer at all public events, but I don't believe in forcing people to adhere to my religious code in public. Why is he talking about Christmas when that's a pagan holiday that turned into a capitalist, materialistic excess of propaganda. The 10 Commandments has nothing to do with our economic situations. The Commandments should be placed in public areas in reference to legal, historical tradition without indoctrination to a specific religious view. Most of the mainstream media is corporatist and agrees with the war on terror. They use the Left/Right Paradigm to control the masses. Lloyd said that only God can fix every problem. I believe in that. Yet, sometimes God can use man to help society. You need

big, bold ideas to solve problems like ending the war on terror, even a guaranteed annual income for all citizens, and a plan for better infrastructure development.

More and more human beings realize that health care is a human right. Health is never some quaint privilege, which is only reserved for the elite in society. Both sides of the health care debate among both parties have promoted pro-corporate politics. The leadership of both major parties wants to maintain the interests of the profit-driven medicine including interests of the corporate drug medicine industry. Both parties are funded by the huge drug monopolies (plus giant insurance companies). The current White House wants to defend its individual mandate. This mandate is toward private insurance companies, which are some of the same companies permitting high administrative costs in the USA. This can penalize low paid workers that resort to using emergency rooms, because they can't afford health insurance. Even Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg admitted that the goal of the law was to preserve a role for the private sector for the private insurers in the health care system. The Republican/Tea Party opponents of the health care law believe that the law is some big government, social welfare system which is a step closer to socialized medicine. That's silliness. There are some legitimate parts of the law like ending discrimination of people utilizing health care based on a preexisting condition. Yet, some Republicans want to continue to attack the constitutionality of social programs like Medicaid, Medicare, and even Social Security (which saved millions of lives literally). The new law will cause corporations to dump workers into state insurance exchanges. We have new developments in science and technology that can extend life expectancies. The elite wants to extend the retirement age, so workers can work longer to benefit corporations (and cut from the common man available technology plus high quality medical services for working people). This is while the super rich can have wealth to command whatever health care resources they want to. In the 2012 election, both the Democrats and the Republicans want spending on our health to be slashed or the status quo to remain in some fashion. The Republicans hypocritically disagree with the cuts in Medicare in the new health care law (in the Republicans minds), but some of them want to end Medicare as we know it absolutely (via privatization). Both parties agree to some cuts to Medicare. That is why real Americans should advocate no cuts to Medicaid, Medicare, and all other social programs. We should expand health care service for all Americans. More than 50 million people in America have no health insurance

and another 25 million are underinsured. The privately owned health care corporations have 200 billion a year in profits from human suffering. Universal health care is a necessity or a public option is fine too. New technology can be used to help humanity. That is why I believe in real constitutional rights, I believe in saving our savings, protecting the security of the elderly, opposing war, fighting against economic inequality, protecting the environment, and handle real issues in the world.
See, he denies that man using public services can assist humanity, but he's proven wrong time after time again (because even some New Deal policies helped this country escaped the recession). There is nothing wrong with helping the environment either. Regardless of divergent views of climate change, it's fine to have clean air, clean water, and clean land. No one wants total equal outcomes. People want fairness. Fairness has nothing to do with some Utopian ideas or stealing wealth. It's about giving people equal opportunities. See, he ignores about how Wall Street bankers stole record wealth from the people and how there is record income inequality. Also, people being poor aren't non-achievers since many of them work day in and day out. It's just that austerity has harmed a lot of poor people including socioeconomic factors as well. Biblical charity is fine and public help. Government mandated giving is part of the Constitution. For example, the Constitution gives Congress the right to fund services, create taxes (which isnt about embracing confiscation at all, etc.). That isn't tyranny. I don't agree with abortion on demand and moral relativism, but I don't agree with a theocracy either. I don't agree with people using excessive profanity and anti-God acts, but I don't agree with the Catholic Church either. Barack Obama isn't a socialist. He's a centrist. Jesus wasn't a socialist completely, but he didn't agree with unregulated capitalism either. Even the OT outlined the Year of Jubilee where the land of Israel was divided equally in perpetual allotments to its citizenry. Each family was to receive an equal share of the land. That policy isn't capitalism. Lloyd Marcus uses the view of 2 Thessalonians 3:10 to justify allowing people to starve to death if they can't work. Now, that verse refers to religious leaders to not be lazy with their walk with God (not to advocate folks to starve to death). Since he loves to quote the Bible so much, the Bible says that the rich will have a hard time to get into Heaven according to Matthew 19:24. Matthew 13:18-22 outlines the deceitfulness of riches. Luke 6:20 says blessed are the poor for theirs is the Kingdom of God. Its so

revolting for some to use the Bible as an excuse to promote discrimination, bigotry, and hatred of the poor when justice for all people is one solution that can lead into a more prodigiously positive society.
It's hypocritical for people like Lloyd to desire welfare for the rich, while oppose legitimate welfare for the poor. His anti-government extremism is silly since the government (although not perfect) can help humanity in many ways if it was eliminated of corporate interests. An animal is different from humanity, but I don't agree with harming animal species unfairly. Lloyd Marcus lied and wrote that advocating the rich to pay their fair share of taxation (and eliminating tax loopholes plus ending rich subsidies) is covetousness. That's wrong. No one is demonizing the rich, but exposing the truth of economic exploitation. See, he denies white supremacy and the evils found in the prison industrial complex. He has a right to marry who he wants, wear the hats, dance for his Tea Party like an acceptable man to the Tea Party, and think that hes an unhyphenated America (and be pro-Republican when the Republican Southern Strategy harmed his own people). Yet, I have the right to call myself a black American (or an African American) plus I have the perfect right to advance liberty without austerity.

We should always Say Kind Words, Honest Words, Real Words, and Constructive Words.
By Timothy