Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Assessment Point: MN-14 The following data are excerpts from multiple reports. While the same location in the Menomonee River watershed is represented, the assessment point IDs differ. Throughout the following data, Assessment Point MN-14 is also represented by: o Reach 905 o Underwood Creek
45 t u
C ii tt y o ff C y o CEDARBURG CEDARBURG
43
C ii tt y o ff C y o MEQUON MEQUON
41 t u 45 t u
WILLOW CREEK
NOR-X-WAY CHANNEL
43
LIT TLE MENOMONEE RIVER UPPER MENOMONEE RIVER
45 t u 41 t u
C ii tt y o ff C y o GLENDALE GLENDALE
LILLY CREEK
45 t u
43
BUTLER DITCH
41 t u
C ii tt y o ff C y o B R O O K F II E L D BROOKF ELD
C ii tt y o ff C y o M II L W A U K E E M LWAUKEE
C ii tt y o ff C y o WAUWATOSA WAUWATOSA
45 t u
UNDERWOOD CREEK
43 41 t u 18 t u
94
DOUSMAN DITCH
18 t u
18 t u
94
o ff SHA SHA
94 18 t u
SOUTH BRANCH UNDERWOOD CREEK
894
C ii tt y o ff C y o W E S T A L L II S WEST ALL S
41 t u
HONEY CREEK
C ii tt y o ff C y o N E W B E R L II N NEW BERL N
45 t u
94
C ii tt y o ff C y o G R E E N F II E L D GREENF ELD
894
43
LEGEND
Water Waterbodies Watersheds Subwatersheds Combined Sewer Area Civil Divisions
0 0.5
1 Miles 2
Watershed Map
WATERSHED RESTORATION PLAN MENOMONEE RIVER WATERSHED
November 10, 2008
45 t u
G " )
T " ) M " )
T " )
@ ?
145
@ ?
181
N.
BR.
NORTH BRANCH MENOMONEE RIVER
@ ?
57
Y " )
E
NO
PIG EO N
E CRE
PIT LAKE
43
@ ?
175
145
41 t u 45 t u BARK LAKE
BAR
MENOM O
W.
RI VE R
F " )
NE
ME NO MO . NEE BR
RIVER
E
LITTLE MENOMONEE CREEK
RI
" )
G
VE R
@ ?
CREEK
@ ?
167
C ii tt y o ff C y o MEQUON MEQUON
ME NO MO NE E
N MO
EE
@ ?
32
K
W " )
@ ?
167 Y " )
@ ?
167
@ ?
57
@ ?
181
WILLOW CREEK
NOR-X-WAY CHANNEL
LITTLE
@ ?
145
CH AN NE L
@ ?
175
CREEK
@ ?
57
LAC du COURS
WIL LOW
AY
NOR-X -W
Y " ) YY " )
RIV
ER
PP " )
@ ?
175 W " )
B " ) G " )
IN D
CREEK
VV " ) J " )
V VV " " ) )
Y " )
LILLY
K
RIV ER
Q " ) V " )
FISH
Q " ) F " )
Q " )
@ ?
32
CREEK
LITTLE
@ ?
57
@ ?
145
43
WAUK E MIL
@ ?
74
@ ?
100
ME
@ ?
100
@ ?
100
@ ?
32
@ ?
74
45 t u 41 t u
@ ?
181
O M
O NE
. CR
N IA
W " )
NO ME
NEE MO
RI V ER
C ii tt y o ff C y o GLENDALE GLENDALE
S " ) W " )
ER RIV
PP " )
@ ?
74
@ ?
145
LILLY CREEK
E WHIT
@ ?
74
S " )
45 t u @ ?
100 E " )
@ ?
57
SUS SEX
VV " )
43
" )
YY K " ) K " ) EE " )
@ ?
181
E CR E
K
EE " )
J " )
BUTLER DITCH
LINCOLN
Y " )
@ ?
190
@ ?
190
@ ?
190
CREEK
@ ?
190 J " )
@ ?
100
@ ?
145
@ ?
57
41 t u
@ ?
164
C ii tt y o ff C y o B R O O K F II E L D BROOKF ELD
45 t u
UN
C ii tt y o ff C y o M II L W A U K E E M LWAUKEE
DE
RIV ER
JJ " )
CREEK
PE
TJ " ) Y " )
UKE WA
FT " )
M " )
OD RW O
E
M " )
FOX
43
RIVER
ER RIV
MENO M
ONE E
94
DOUSMAN DITCH
41 t u
DOUSMAN
K EE CR
18 t u
DITCH
" )
J
JJ " )
18 t u
DEER
CRE E K
18 t u
94
A A
94
SOUTH BRANCH UNDERWOOD CREEK
t u
18
894
@ ?
181
@ ?
59 D " ) Y " )
AR PL PO
@ ?
59
@ ?
59
@ ?
59
ER RIV
O " )
@ ?
100 D " )
C ii tt y o ff C y o W E S T A L L II S WEST ALL S
41 t u KINNICKINNIC
LYONS
@ ?
32
D " ) ES " )
T " ) NN
" )
HO Y NE
HONEY CREEK
E CR EK
W IL
C ii tt y o ff C y o N E W B E R L II N NEW BERL N
SO
@ ?
9
Y " ) U " )
U " )
@ u ? t 45
100
C ii tt y o ff C y o G R E E N F II E L D GREENF ELD
@ ?
36
PA RK
94
CR.
@ ?
164
" )
O I " )
I " )
894
CREEK
@ ?
38
43
UPPER KELLY LAKE
LOWER KELLY LAKE
Y " ) N " )
" )
Y
@ ?
24
MILL
EK CR E
I " )
@ ?
119
OK
ES " )
@ ?
24
LEGEND
Water Waterbodies Watersheds Subwatersheds Civil Divisions
Aerial Map
WATERSHED RESTORATION PLAN MENOMONEE RIVER WATERSHED
October, 14, 2008
45 t u
MN-1
C ii tt y o ff C y o MEQUON MEQUON
43
MN-1 MN-3
41 t u 45 t u
MN-2 MN-10
!
MN-3
!!
MN-2
!
MN-4 MN-4
MN-6 MN-5
MN-10
43
!
MN-9
MN-7
C ii tt y o ff C y o
MN-7
GLENDALE GLENDALE
45 t u
MN-8
!!
MN-12
MN-9
! !
MN-11
43
MN-12 MN-8
MN-15
41 t u
C ii tt y o ff C y o B R O O K F II E L D BROOKF ELD
45 t u
C ii tt y o ff C y o M II L W A U K E E M LWAUKEE
C ii tt y o ff C y o WAUWATOSA WAUWATOSA
MN-13 MN-13
MN-14
94 18 t u
!
MN-14
18 t u
MN-15 MN-17
43 41 t u 18 t u
! ! MN-16 ! MN-17
94
A A
18 t u
94
MN-18
! MN-18
894
C ii tt y o ff C y o W E S T A L L II S WEST ALL S
41 t u
C ii tt y o ff C y o N E W B E R L II N NEW BERL N
45 t u
MN-16
C ii tt y o ff C y o G R E E N F II E L D GREENF ELD
94
894
43
LEGEND
Assessment Points Water Routing Reach Tributary Area Watersheds Waterbodies Civil Divisions
o ff o F II E L D F ELD
C ii tt C WAUW WAUW
!
MN-14
!
C ii tt y C y WEST A WEST
LEGEND
!
" "
o ff o F II E L D F ELD
C ii tt C WAUW WAUW
!
MN-14
!
C ii tt y C y WEST A WEST
LEGEND
Assessment Points Water Waterbodies Watersheds Assessment Point Basins Civil Division
Land Use
Agriculture Low Density Residential High Density Residential Commercial
Institutional and Governmental Outdoor Recreation, Wetlands, Woodlands and Open Lands Transportation, Communication and Utilites Manufacturing and Industrial
Menomonee River - Variance Standards/Targets Constituent Measure Variance Standard - Geomean not to exceed Fecal Coliform Dissolved Oxygen (DO) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Total Phosphorus (TP) Variance Standard - Less than 10% of all samples/month Variance Standard - Minimum Concentration USGS Median TSS Reference Concentration (estimated background concentration) Planning Guideline Richards Baker Flashiness Index (quantifies the frequency and rapidity of short-term changes in stream flow; the index ranges from 0 - 2, with 0 being constant flow) Standard/Target 1,000 counts/100 ml 2,000 counts/100 ml 2 mg/l 17.2 mg/l 0.1 mg/l
Flashiness
indicator only
Menomonee River Watershed Restoration Plan Fact Sheet MN-14, Reach 905, Underwood Creek
Data resulting from model runs:
Figure Flashiness index Dissolved oxygen v. days per year Fecal coliform v. days per year
Overall Project Analysis Team Assessment Good to Moderate The Flashiness Index quantifies the frequency and rapidity of short-term changes in stream flow. The index ranges from 0 Good to Moderate Variable (some good, some bad)
to 2, with 0 being constant flow. The flashiness is slightly high at this location. Typically, aquatic communities need 5 mg/l or more of dissolved oxygen to survive. Concentrations at this site fall below this level occasionally, but never fall below the 2 mg/l variance standard. For recreational uses, lower fecal coliform counts (a measure of bacteria) are better (preferably under 400 counts / 100ml). The counts on majority of the days are either below 400 or above 5,000. A potential goal in this case may be to determine the conditions that create the above 5,000 days and discourage recreational use on days that meet these conditions. As there is a variance that allows the fecal coliform to reach 2,000 counts, another goal could be to reduce fecal coliform loads in order to increase the number of days that have fewer than 2,000 counts. Phosphorus is a nutrient that can lead to increased growth of algae. The concentrations on most of the days are at or below the 0.1 mg/l planning guideline. Throughout the year, the phosphorus concentration does not exceed 0.35 mg/l on any day Suspended solids cause water to become cloudy and aesthetically unpleasant. They can clog the gills of fish and invertebrates, make feeding difficult, and lead to sediment deposition (poor habitat). The concentrations are less than 25 mg/l on most of the days, but the concentrations exceed 100 mg/l on some of the days. While it is natural for dissolved oxygen concentrations to decline during warmer months, the concentrations decline sporadically in March and during the summer and early winter this is unusual. The low concentrations in March may be related to pollutants and biochemical oxygen demand in the runoff associated with snow melt. While the ranges of values are fairly consistent throughout the year, notice that the 75th percentile value declines substantially in the summer and early fall. This may be related to the die-off of bacteria. Bacteria are most prevalent in the winter and conditions are particularly poor in March. This is most likely related to snow melt. Phosphorus concentrations are greatest in March and are likely related to snow-melt. Concentrations then decline during the summer and early fall. This could be related to uptake by plants during the growing season. Suspended solids concentrations are below the reference concentration most of the time. The majority of the higher concentrations are likely related to larger rain or snow melt events that disturb bare soil.
Phosphorus v. days per year Suspended solids v. days per year Monthly dissolved oxygen Monthly fecal coliform Monthly phosphorus Monthly suspended solids
Overall Project Analysis Team Assessment Note that dissolved oxygen concentrations decline at low flows. This is likely due to a combination of decreased water Good Moderate to Poor
agitation and higher temperatures (low flow conditions are often associated with the warm summer months). Generally, a pollutant that is present at high concentrations during high flows and low concentrations during low flows (fecal coliform, in this case) is attributed primarily to non-point sources. The infrequent sewer overflows (once every 2-5 years) would only contribute during the high flows when substantial non-point sources are already present. Note that during any period with the highest flows, fecal coliform counts exceed the variance standard. During moist conditions, fecal coliform exceeds the standard 50% of the time. During low flows and dry conditions, the standard is met nearly all of the time. During these low flows would be the safest time for recreational uses (boating, wading, swimming), although the amount of water in the stream may limit recreational use to wading. Concentrations of phosphorus are highest at high flows, with concentrations exceeding the 0.1 mg/l planning guideline over 50% of the time at the highest flows. This suggests the prevalence of non-point loads of phosphorus. The similarities between the phosphorus and suspended solids data suggest that the phosphorus may be associated with suspended sediment. The concentrations of suspended solids increase with increased flows, suggesting contributions from non-point sources. The suspended solids may come from runoff that carries a sediment load, from stream bank erosion, or re-suspended stream sediments. Note that this site is located downstream of some concrete-lined reaches within the watershed. As a result, upstream activities such as stream bank erosion and re-suspension of stream sediments likely make less of a contribution to suspended sediment loads at this site compared to sites that are situated downstream of natural reaches that experience these activities.
Good to Moderate
Good
Flashiness Index
Reach 905
Assessment Point
MN-14 Underwood Creek
Statistic
Condition Existing
8,133 71 691 247 2,964 86 351 147 11.0 11.1 100 0.066 0.043 84 0.67 0.61 16.8 7.9 0.0048 0.0013
Mean (cells per 100 ml) Percent compliance with single sample standard (<400 cells per 100 ml) Geometric mean (cells per 100 ml) Days of compliance with geometric mean standard (<200 cells per 100 ml)
Mean (cells per 100 ml) Percent compliance with single sample standard (<400 cells per 100 ml) Geometric mean (cells per 100 ml) Days of compliance with geometric mean standard (<200 cells per 100 ml)
Dissolved Oxygen
Mean (mg/l) Median (mg/l) Percent compliance with dissolved oxygen standard (>5 mg/l)
Total Phosphorus
Mean (mg/l) Median (mg/l) Percent compliance with recommended phosphorus standard (0.1 mg/l)
Total Nitrogen
Copper
400
360
320
280
240
200
160
120
80
40
0 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 >10
Average DO (mg/L)
360
320
280
240
200
160
120
80
40
360
320
280
240
200
160
120
80
40
0 0-0.05 0.05-0.1 0.1-0.15 0.15-0.2 0.2-0.25 0.25-0.3 0.3-0.35 0.35-0.4 0.4-0.45 0.45-0.5 >0.5
Average TP (mg/L)
360
320
280
240
200
160
120
80
40
Concentration (mg/L)
10
1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Flow Duration Interval (%)
1.E+04
C onc e ntra tion (c fu/1 0 0 m L)
1.E+03
1.E+02
1.E+01
1.E+00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Flow Duration Interval (%)
Concentration (mg/L)
0.10
0.01
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Flow Duration Interval (%)
Concentration (mg/L)
100
10
1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Flow Duration Interval (%)