Sie sind auf Seite 1von 8

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Major 3-Year Study of Traffic Signage Adequacy in Winnipeg Released by Safer Street Solutions
Concludes city speed limit and school/playground signage is grossly inadequate, placing motorists at risk while allowing photo and police enforcement to intentionally prey on deficient areas to maximize traffic violations Winnipeg, March 12, 2012 Chris Sweryda, founder of Safer Street Solutions, has undertaken a massive analysis of Winnipegs traffic signage adequacy relative to national standards, best practices adopted by other Canadian cities and even the City of Winnipegs own policies. The exhaustive research project has been 3 years in the making and culminates in a detailed report that identifies gross deficiencies in traffic signage so prevalent that mobile photo radar and police enforcement can be found regularly enforcing in these locations as an obvious predatory tactic to raise ticket revenue. The evidence is there for everyone to see where you find inadequate traffic signage, you are almost certain to find some form of enforcement, says Chris Sweryda. But whats even more egregious is that Winnipeg is the only major city in Canada that upholds such substandard signage practices and when challenged on the issue City officials inform me that Winnipeg cant be compared with other cities, but they cant properly explain why. Mr. Sweryda has presented many of his findings to the Citys Public Works Department resulting in numerous sign upgrades, only a few of which were speed signs. Their agenda is dangerously obvious - they dont want to unplug the cash machine. Its ironic that the #1 contributing factor in fatal collisions is speed according to MPIC and Winnipeg Police, yet the city refuses to dual sign its speed limits, adds Sweryda. So much for it being all about safety. A classic example of the need for dual signing speed limit and speed reduction signs on divided roads in Winnipeg involves East St. Paul resident Helen Fitzpatrick, who has been driving for 51 years with a clean driving record. Helen was ticketed in 2011 on westbound Grant Ave. at Wilton (the Citys top producing intersection speed camera) for driving 64 km/hr in a 50 km/hr zone. Helen, a senior on a fixed income, paid the $ 225 fine but argues that she could not see the curbside speed reduction signage because her view was visually obstructed by a truck. What is the point of speed limits if drivers arent made aware of them, Fitzpatrick asks. Why is it so difficult to put a second median sign up? It seems the City prefers to encourage speeding instead of discouraging it. I think the Mayor has his priorities a little backwards. The report by Safer Streets Solutions is in the form of a 100 page powerpoint presentation, complete with pictures and videos to verify each and every point. It is a compelling indictment of the City of Winnipegs appalling signage practices that actually place motorists at higher risk compared to other cities in Canada.

Major conclusions from the Safer Streets Solutions study include: Speed Limit Signs General
The city of Winnipeg fails to comply with its own standards that require speed signs to be larger when they are further than 3m from the road 69 of 98 speed reductions in Winnipeg fail to comply with national MUTCD standards Winnipeg Police and mobile radar units enforce almost exclusively in speed reduction zones that are not adequately signed. Enforcement in properly signed zones is virtually nil. Many speed limit signs are missing entirely. Enforcement is aggressive at these sites and especially if it involves a missing speed reduction sign Speed reduction signs are found up to 3.5 times further off the road than permissible by city standards Numerous speed limit and reduction signs are higher than the tops of many overpasses

Lost in space - why didnt they just place it on the light pole near the road?

Many speed reduction signs are non-reflective and virtually invisible at night-time. Some of these signs precede regular enforcement sites that are used for night-time enforcement

Speed Limit Dual Signing

Speed limit signs are the only traffic signs that are not placed on both sides of divided or one-way roads (dual signed), where as every other major city in western Canada dual signs its speed limit signs Speed reductions occur on roads with up to 4 lanes of traffic yet are not dual signed while most other signs are dual signed on roads with as few as 1 lane

58 of Winnipeg's 98 speed reductions are on divided roads where the signs should be dual signed for maximum awareness and compliance Winnipeg's top three producing intersection cameras follow speed reductions that are not dual signed on multi-lane divided roads. As well, each fails to meet MUTCD placement standards Dual signing is done for speed limit signs on provincial roads outside of Winnipeg. All provincial signs are also compliant with MUTCD and other standards

50 km/hr Unless Otherwise Posted 86% of mobile photo enforcement sites are in 50 km/h zones and almost all are either unsigned or follow an improperly signed speed reduction. The majority of live police enforcement occurs in areas with no speed limits posted as well Over 92% of the mobile enforcement in 50 km/hr speed limit locations do not post a speed limit sign The city claims it cannot post 50 km/hr speed limit signs outside of speed reduction zones so as to not erode the 50 km/hr limit unless otherwise posted rule yet there are 111 examples of posted 50 km/hr signs that contradict this claim and almost all are on streets that are not regularly enforced

Every other major city in western Canada uses selective 50 km/h signing on major roads to reinforce the 50 unless otherwise posted rule Intersection cameras issue 2 times more tickets in zones without speed signing than in zones with posted speed signs

School and Playground Zones


Many school and playground zone signs are missing. Photo enforcement is continuing in the absence of these signs Complaints to the city have failed to get any of these missing signs replaced Dozens of school zone signs in 60 km/h zones are smaller than the minimum size prescribed by city policy for that speed zone Many signs are placed at a substantial distance before major intersections so drivers entering the roadway from the intersection have no idea they are entering a school or playground zone. Proper signing does occur at locations lacking photo radar Playground zones that are not dual signed tend to be enforced by mobile photo radar far more aggressively than dual signed playground zones

The only location in the city with dual signed 50 km/h signs is on westbound Grant Ave. after Waverley St. It also happens to be the school zone that the City of Winnipeg uses for press conferences when promoting school zone safety. And ironically, it is the only 50 km/hr zone on Grant Ave. that is not photo enforced

Other
Winnipeg is the only western Canadian city that uses a 4.0 second amber in 80 km/h zones. All other cities use the ITE engineering formula to calculate amber times or use a minimum of 5.0 seconds in 80 km/hr zones. Winnipeg red light cameras in 80 km/h zones issue 6 times more tickets per camera then those in 50-70 km/h zones The City of Winnipeg tickets 3 times more speeding violations annually than the City of Saskatoon (15% of its population is ticketed annually vs. 5% respectively) - 30 Media Contact: Chris Sweryda, Safer Street Solutions (full study powerpoint slide deck available on request) Ph. 204-801-9239 csweryda@hotmail.com

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen