Sie sind auf Seite 1von 104

PIERO M.

ARMENANTE NJIT

The theory that studies the separation of solids from solid-liquid suspensions under the effect of gravity.

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Sedimentation theory is used in the design of:


Grit Chambers Primary and Secondary Settling Tanks (Clarifiers) Thickeners Flotation Thickeners

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

A clarifier is a device used to produce a

clarified effluent starting from a solid-liquid suspension.


A thickener is a device used to produce a

concentrated solid suspension starting from a more diluted solid-liquid suspension.


Each of these two devices must contain a

clarifying section and a thickening section.


The terms clarifier and thickener are

often used interchangeably.


PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Parameters Affecting Settling of Solids


Settling of solids depends primarily on:

characteristics of the solids (e.g., type, size, shape, density) concentration of the solids characteristics of the liquid (e.g., density, viscosity) fluid dynamic settling device conditions in the

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Settling phenomena are often classified into four distinct categories:

Settling Phenomenon
Discrete particle settling (gravity settling) Flocculent settling Hindered settling (zone settling, gravity thickening) Compression settling

Type
Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Discrete particle settling refers to the sedimentation of individual particles in quiescent liquids This type of settling describes well the sedimentation of particles in dilute suspensions in which the interactions between particles are insignificant Design applications: grit chambers, sedimentation in top portion of clarifiers

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

FB FD F
D

FW
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Single Particle Settling in a Quiescent Liquid - Momentum Balance


dv s m = FW FB FD dt
where: m = particle mass vs = particle velocity FW = gravity force FB = buoyancy force FD = drag force
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Single Particle Settling in a Quiescent Liquid - Momentum Balance


Since: FW = g s Vp FB = g L Vp 2 with: Ap = projected area of particle Vp = volume of particle then: 2 CD Ap L v s dv s m = g ( s L )Vp 2 dt
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT
2 CD Ap L v s

FD =

Single Particle Settling in a Quiescent Liquid - Terminal Velocity


At steady state it is:

vs =

2 ( s L ) g Vp CD L Ap

If the particle is a sphere then:


vs = 4 ( s L ) dp g CD L 3

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Single Particle Settling in a Quiescent Liquid - Drag Coefficient

After Sundstrom and Klei, Wastewater Treatment, 1979, p. 190 PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Single Particle Settling in a Quiescent Liquid - Drag Coefficient


For Re < 1:

CD = 24 / Re

L v s dp with Re =
For 1 < Re < 10,000:

24 3 CD = + + 0.34 Re Re
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Single Particle Settling in a Quiescent Liquid - Terminal Velocity for Spheres (Re < 1)
For Re < 1, CD = 24/Re, and one obtains Stokes' Law:

vs

( s L ) d 2 =g
18
p

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Ideal Rectangular Settling Tank


Width = W Inlet Zone Q Q H Settling Zone u

Sludge Zone L Outlet Zone

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Assumptions Made in Modeling Ideal Settling Tanks (Type 1 Settling)



Suspension is homogeneously distributed across the cross sectional area of the tank Liquid in settling zone moves in plug flow with constant velocity u Particles settle as in a quiescent liquid independently of other particles (dilute suspension) Particles are small enough to settle following Stokes law in the laminar region (Re < 1) When a particle enters the sludge region (i.e., it strikes the bottom of the vessel) it is effectively removed from the suspension

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

(Type 1 Settling)

u vs H Q vo Sludge Zone L u

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Retention (or Detention) Time: The average time an element of fluid will spend in a vessel under steady state conditions:
V to = Q

where:

V = volume of vessel Q = flow in and out of vessel


Q Q

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Note that to is also the time a generic fluid element needs to move (under plug flow conditions) across the settling tank, i.e., to cover the distance L:
V W H L L to = = = Q W H u u

where W, H, and L are, respectively the width, height, and length of the sedimentation tank, and u is the average fluid velocity (assumed uniform across the tank cross section).
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

If to is the residence time of the liquid inside the tank then all the particles having settling velocities equal to, or greater than, the critical settling velocity, vo, will settle at or before to.
H vo = to

This implies that all particles having a settling velocities equal to, or greater than, vo will be separated from the fluid in the settling tank.

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Since it is: to = L/u then:


H H u H uW Q vo = = = = to L LW A

where:

Q = volumetric flow rate of wastewater A = surface area of tank

Important: This equation does not contain the height of the tank.
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

The term:

vo =

Q A

called the overflow rate or surface-loading rate is the key parameter in the design of ideal clarifiers in which the solids settle as discrete particles. Once the overflow rate is set the surface area of the tank, A, is determined (for a given Q) and so is the fraction of solid removal. The height of the tank plays no role.
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Q H Q h vx Sludge Zone L u u vo

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Only a fraction of the particles having a generic settling velocity, vx (smaller than vo), will settle. The fraction, Fx, of particles of diameter dx (for which the settling velocity is vx) that will settle is:

hx Fx = H
where: hx = vx to H = vo to
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

(Type 1 Settling)

Particles having a diameter equal to or larger than do (for which the settling velocity is vo) will completely settle during time to. For particles having a particle diameter dx (smaller than the critical diameter, do) the fractional removal is given by:

hx v x t o v x v x A Fx = = = = Q H v o to vo
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Cumulative Distribution Curve for Particle Settling Velocities (Type 1 Settling)


f, Fraction of Particles with a vs Smaller than the Abscissa
1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5

fo

vo
Settling Velocity (mm/s)

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

(Type 1 Settling)
The total (cumulative) fraction of particles removed in a settling tank having an overflow rate vo (corresponding to a removal fraction fo) is:
1 F = (1 fo ) + vo
fo
0

v s (f ) df

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

f-v
The fraction, f, of particles having a settling velocity smaller that a given velocity, v, can be obtain in a settling tube from which samples are taken at a fixed depth, h. The fraction of solids in the sample at any given time, t (from which v=h/t can be obtained), will be equal to f.

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

f-v

Sampling Depth

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

For a given wastewater flow rate, Q, the fraction of free settling solids removed depends only on the surface area of the tank, A, i.e., on the overflow rate, vo. The height of the tank plays, in principle, no role and can be chosen independently. Choosing H (with known Q, A, and vo) implies the automatic definition of to (since to = H/vo). The width of the tank can also be chosen independently provided that the velocity of the wastewater in the tank is not too high to produce scouring.

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

W Q H1 L

W Q

H2 L

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

It was shown before that the height of the tank plays no role in the performance of the tank. To show this with an example assume that:

Q = cons tan t H 2 = 2 H1
However:

V2 = 2V1 to 2 = V2 Q vo 2 = H2 t o 2 t o 2 = 2 t o1 v o1 = v o 2

to1 = V1 Q
Hence:

and

vo1 = H1 to1
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

and

If the water velocity in the tank is too high (i.e., it exceeds the scour velocity) settled solids can be resuspended, i.e., scoured from the bottom of the tank. The scour velocity can be calculated from:

uscour =
where:

8 g d p s L L f

= constant (0.04 for unigranular sand; 0.06 for sticky interlocking materials)
f= Darcy-Weisbach friction factor (0.02 - 0.03)

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Inlet Zone

Settling Zone

vo u vs

Outlet Zone

Sludge Zone

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

At any time and radial distance it is:

Q = u (r ) 2 r H
R2 dr r R1
u(r) r Q

and: dr = u(r) dt
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Q u( r ) = 2 r H

i.e.:
Q dr = dt 2r H

2 r H dr = Q R1
R2

to 0

H dt = to = vo Q vo = A

HA H H 2 2 ( R 2 R1 ) = = Q vo Q
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

In an interval dt a particle having a diameter smaller than do will have moved vertically and horizontally, respectively:

dhx = v x dt
i.e.,

and

Q dr = dt 2r H

2r H dhx = vx dr Q

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Particles having a diameter equal to or larger than do (for which the settling velocity is vo) will completely settle during time to. For particles having a particle diameter dx (smaller than the critical diameter, do) the fractional removal is given by:
R2

hx Fx = = H
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

R1

2 r H v x dr

HQ

vx vx A 2 2 2 (R 2 R 2 ) = = Q Q

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Removal of grit (including sand and small gravel) is extremely important in plants in order to avoid:

wear of mechanical equipment deposition of grit in pipes, channels, aeration tanks and other basins.

Grit removal is typically accomplished in grit chambers.

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Most grit particles have settling velocities < 0.03 m/s Well-designed grit chambers typically remove 95% of grit particles with a diameter > 0.2 mm Poorly designed (or overdesigned) grit chambers remove particles made of organic material or grit with a high organic content (which should be treated instead) Two types of chambers are commonly used:

Constant velocity grit chambers Aerated grit chambers

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Design criterion:

H L = K u vo
where: L = length of chamber K = safety factor (1.5 - 2) vo = settling velocity of grit particle u = horizontal wastewater velocity H = height of chamber

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Particle Diameter (mm) Settling Velocity (mm/s) Particle Diameter (mm) Settling Velocity (mm/s)

0.6

0.4

0.2

1000

63

42

21

0.15

0.1

0.08

0.06

15

3.8

s = 2650 kg/m3
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Shape of chamber cross section: trapezoidal, parabolic, V-shaped or rectangular Typical design assumption: horizontal flow velocity = 0.3 m/s Design assumption: smallest grit settling velocity = 0.03 m/s, i.e., minimum chamber length-to-height ratio, L/H = 10 Typical L/H = 20, to account for reduced settling velocity due to turbulence effects Typical width-to-length ratio, W/L = 1:3 - 1:8 Typical retention time = 60 s.

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

After Horan, Biological Wastewater Treatment System, 1991, p. 47 PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Discrete Particle Settling

Heigh of LiquidSolid Interface

Flocculent Settling Hindered Settling Compression Settling

Time
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Coalescence of particles can occur during settling (e.g., larger particles with high settling velocities overtaking smaller particle with low settling velocities) Collision frequency among particles proportional to particle concentration is

Collision frequency is proportional to turbulence level. Too high a turbulent intensity also promotes breakup Total number of collisions increases with time

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

When particles agglomerate during settling (flocculent settling) their settling velocity increases The rate of particle settling increases with time Longer residence times and greater tank depth promote coalescence of particles Fractional removal of particles during flocculent settling is a function of overflow rate and residence time. By contrast, in discrete particle settling fractional removal depends only on the overflow rate

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

H4 H2 Ports H1 H0
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

100% H4 H3
H

80% H2 H1 40% H0 t0 t1 t2 t t3 t4 50% 60% 70%

Curves indicate percent removal in samples


PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

The fraction, Ro, of particles that have settling velocities equal to, or larger than, vo will have settled during the time interval to. Recall that: H vo = to Only some fractions of the other particle having vs<vo will have settled during to. The total fraction, Rtotal, of removed (settled) particles is:

Rtotal = Ro

(H1 + H0 ) +
2 Ho

(R1 R0 )

(Hn + Hn1) +L+


2 Ho

(Rn Rn1)

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Since flocculent settling in a stagnant liquid depends on the depth of the settling column the design of continuous settling tanks requires experimental data (settling curves) The experimental data must be obtained with a column as tall as the depth of the continuous settling tank

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

The tank can be designed using the equations:

H H u H uW Q = = = to L LW A
i.e.:

Qt o A= H
where: H = height tank = height of column in the which the experiments were conducted to = time to produce the desired solid removal in the settling experiments
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

The term:

H Q vo = = to A is the experimentally determined overflow rate. Hence the tank can be sized using: Q A= vo In practice the overflow rate from test column and the residence time for the settling tank are multiplied by safety factors (equal to 0.65-0.85 and 1.25 - 1.5, respectively.)
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

In conventional wastewater treatment primary sedimentation tanks (PSTs) come after grit chambers PSTs are typically designed assuming Type 2 settling characteristics Some 50-70% solids are typically removed in PSTs Because of the uncertainties about flocculent sedimentation a number of safety factors are included in the design of PSTs, such as:

1.5 - 2.0 calculated detention time 0.6 - 0.8 surface loading (overflow rate)

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Detention Time Average Overflow Rate Peak Overflow Rate Weir Loading Solid Concentration in Sludge

1.5-2.0 hr 800-1,200 gal/ft2 day 2,000-3,000 gal/ft2 day 10,000-40,000 gal/ft day 4-10% (primary tanks) 0.5-2% (secondary tanks)

After Metcalf and Eddy, Wastewater Engineering, 1989, p. 475 PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Non-ideal settling of particles in sedimentation tanks is affected by:

turbulence hydraulic short-circuiting bottom scouring velocity

All these effect will result in shorter residence time of the particles and/or the fluid in the tank

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

After Horan, Biological Wastewater Treatment System, 1991, p. 99 PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Rectangular Circular

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

After Metcalf and Eddy, Wastewater Engineering, 1989, p. 478 PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

After Metcalf and Eddy, Wastewater Engineering, 1989, p. 478 PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Depth (ft) Length (ft) Width (ft) Length/Width Flight Speed (ft/min)

10 - 15 50 - 300 10 - 80 3:1 - 5:1 2-4

After Metcalf and Eddy, Wastewater Engineering, 1989, p. 477 PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Circular Primary Sedimentation Tanks (Side View)

After Weber, Physicochemical Processes, 1972, p. 129 PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Circular Primary Sedimentation Tanks (Top View)

After Sundstrom and Klei, Wastewater Treatment, 1979, p. 209 PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Depth (ft) Diameter (ft) Bottom Slope (in/ft) Rotational Speed of Sludge Scraper Arm (rpm)

10-15 10-200 0.75-2 0.02-0.05

After Metcalf and Eddy, Wastewater Engineering, 1989, p. 477 PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Hindered settling occurs when the particle concentration is high enough so that the interaction between particles is significant In such a case the cohesive forces among particles are strong enough to restrict the movement of particles with respect to each other The particles then settle collectively establishing a distinct interface between the clarified liquid and the settling particles

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

The settling velocity under hindered conditions is much slower that under discrete particle settling conditions and is a strong function of particle concentration For spherical particles it is

v hs = v ss (1 X )
where:

vhs = hindered settling velocity vss = single particle velocity X = volume fraction of solids n = constant (n =4.65 for Re < 0.3; n = 2.33 for Re > 1000)

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

When the particle density is very high the particles can provide partial mechanical support for the particles above them The particles under these conditions undergo mechanical compression as they settle Compression settling is a very slow process

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Equation describing compression settling:


m t t H t H = (H o H ) e ( o )

where:

Ht = height of solids at time t H = height of solids at infinite time Ho = height of solids at time to m = constant

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Influent Wastewater

Effluent

Sludge

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Qe
Solid-Liquid Interface

Q= Q + Q
e

u Solid Flux Across Boundary

Qu
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Gravity settling:
Gg = v x X

where:

Gg = solid flux due to gravity vx = settling velocity of solids X = concentration of solids at a given height

Bulk transport:

Gu = u b X
where: Gu = solid flux due to bulk flow ub = bulk downward velocity of solids

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Interface Height

v
Increasing Solid Concentration

Time

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Solid Settling Velocity, v x

Solid Concentration, X

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Solid Gravity Flux, G g

Gg = vx X

Solid Concentration, X

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Given that: Qu = volumetric flow rate at the bottom of the thickener A= surface area of the thickener (perpendicular to downward flow)

then:

Qu ub = A
where ub = bulk velocity of slurry
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Total Flux Solid Flux, G Bulk Flux

Gravity Flux

Solid Concentration, X

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Total solid downward flux:

GT = Gg + Gu = v x X + u b X
where: GT = total solid flux

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Total Flux Solid Flux, G GL Bulk Flux ub ub XL G u

Gravity Flux XL Solid Concentration, X


PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

v LXL Xu

Gg

GL

In the thickening section of the thickenerclarifier the solid concentration ranges from the feed concentration value to the exit underflow concentration value (Xu) In this range a concentration will typically exists that produces the smallest (limiting) value, GL, of the solid flux G If the thickener-clarifier is designed for a value of G such that G > GL the solids will build up in the clarifying section of the thickener-clarifier and eventually overflow

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

GL XL

Xu

The coordinates of the point where the total gravity flux curve has a minimum correspond to GL and XL. GL is the highest flux allowable in the clarifier. Hence the clarifier must be designed using this as the limiting flux. Note that at the bottom of the clarifier (where the sludge is removed) there is no gravity flux and all the solids are removed via bulk flux. At the bottom of the clarifier it must be that:

GT

Xu

= Gu

Xu

= ub X u

from which Xu can be calculated.


PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Mass balance for solids in a thickener-clarifier: Solids in = Solids out + Solids out (with sludge) (with clarified effluent) i.e.: Qo X o = Qu X u + Qe X e where: QoXo = Flow of solids into the thickener-clarifier Since a very little amount of solids typically escapes with the clarified effluent it is: Qe X e 0 i.e.: Qo X o Qu X u
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

At steady state it must be that:

AGL = Qu X u Qo X o
i.e.:

Qo X o A= GL
where GL = limiting solid flux at concentration XL. Note that the term QoXo is typically fixed for a given wastewater. Hence, the greater the value of GL the smaller the area A will be. However, a greater GL will imply a smaller Xu.
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

L b
Total Flux Solid Flux, G GL Bulk Flux ub Gravity Flux ub XL G u

v LXL XL Solid Concentration, X Xu

Gg

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

L
Total Flux Solid Flux, G GL Bulk Flux Gravity Flux ubXL Gu

ub X L= X o Xu

v LXL

Gg

Solid Concentration, X
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

This method has the advantage of relying on the construction of the gravity flux curve alone to calculate GL, and Xu. The method is based on the realization that at XL (i.e., GL) the total flux (GT-Xu) curve has a minimum. Hence it must be that:
d GT dX =
XL

d Gg + Gu dX

)
XL

d Gg dX
XL

d Gu + dX

=0
XL

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

d Gg dX
XL

d Gu + dX

=
XL

d Gg dX
XL

d (ub X ) + dX

=
XL

d Gg dX
XL

+ ub = 0

d Gg dX
XL

= ub

which implies that at XL the tangent to the gravity flux curve must be equal to -ub. The Xu and GL values can be found where this tangent intercepts the x-axis and y-axis, respectively.
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Total Flux Solid Flux, G GL Bulk Flux ub Gravity Flux ub XL G u

v LXL XL Solid Concentration, X


PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Gg

Xu

GL
Tangent
Solid Flux, G

GL Gravity Flux -ub vL

Solid Concentration, X
PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Xu

GL Xu
G'L
Solid Flux, G

GL

- u'

- ub

X' Xu Solid Concentration, X u

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Determination of the Area of a ClarifierThickener (Yoshioka's Method)



Obtain total wastewater flow (Qo) and incoming solid concentration (Xo) Determine the desired concentration (Xu) underflow solid

Calculate the limiting solid flux GL from the solid flux vs. solid concentration curve Calculate the required thickener area A Separately compute the minimum area of the clarifying section. Take the largest of the two areas

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Alternative Thickener Area Calculation - Talmadge and Finch's Method


Interface Height, H
Hindered Settling Bisecting Line Tangent Line Compression Settling

Hu tu Time, t

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Alternative Thickener Area Calculation - Talmadge and Finch's Method

Obtain data on settling rate in test column. Determine interface height of settling solids, H, as a function of time, t Construct curve of H vs. t. Determine the point where hindered settling changes to compression settling. To do this:

determine intersection of tangents construct bisecting line through this point draw tangent to the H-vs.-t curve where the bisecting line intersects the curve

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Alternative Thickener Area Calculation - Talmadge and Finch's Method

Draw a horizontal line for H = Hu, corresponding to the achievement of the desired underflow concentration, Xu, in the test column. The value of Hu can be determined from X o Ho Hu = Xu Determine tu by drawing a vertical line at the point where the horizontal line at Hu intersects the previously obtained tangent to the H-vs.-t curve

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Alternative Thickener Area Calculation - Talmadge and Finch's Method

Finally obtain the surface area required for thickening from:

Qo t u A= Ho
Separately compute the minimum area of the clarifying section using as particle sedimentation velocity the settling velocity of the slurry at time = 0 from the column experiment. Take the largest of the two areas

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

The equations describing the settling of solids under hindered settling conditions do not include tank depth. Hence, tank depth can be fixed arbitrarily by the designer Specifying tank depth is equivalent to specifying the residence time in the thickener (for a given flow rate and thickener area) In practice the residence time is of the order of 1 -2 hours to reduce the impact of non-ideal behavior (due for example to the presence of turbulence)

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Secondary sedimentation tanks (SST) are commonly used to separate (and partially recycle) the biomass in the activated sludge process SST are commonly designed assuming that the activated sludge settles under hindered settling conditions Type of SST commonly used are:

Rectangular Circular

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Settling following: Air Activated Sludge Oxygen Activated Sludge Extended Aeration Trickling Filters Rotating Biological Contactors

Overflow Rate (gal/ft2 day) 400 - 800 400 - 800 200 - 400 400 - 600 400 - 800

Solid Loading (lb ft2 hr) 0.8 - 1.2 1.0 - 1.4 0.2 - 1.0 0.6 - 1.0 0.7 - 1.2

Depth (ft) 12 - 20 12 - 20 12 - 20 10 - 15 10 - 15

After Metcalf and Eddy, Wastewater Engineering, 1989, p. 588 PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Tank Loading for Common Suspensions


Nature of solid Specific Gravity 2.65 1.002 1.2 1.001 1.005 Settling Velocity (cm/s) as low as 710-3 8.310-2 4.210-2 4.210-2 0.2 Overflow Rate (gal/ft2day) 150144,000 600-1800 600-2880 600-800 800-1200 Detention Time (h) 0.01-15 2-8 1-4 1-2 1-2

Sand, Silt, Clay Aluminum and iron flocs CaCO3 precipitates Primary waste organics Activated sludge organics

After Weber, Physicochemical Processes, 1972, p. 128. PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

For the same total flow rate tube settlers reduce the distance the solids have to travel to settle The sedimented solids can slide down the tube and be collected at the bottom of the tank Two types of tube settlers are common:

horizontal tube settlers (5o angle) steeply inclined tube settlers (60o angle)

High efficiency are possible but clogging can be a problem

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Additional information and examples can be found in the following references:

Corbitt, R. A., 1990, The Standard Handbook of Environmental Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 5.84-5.94; 6.80-6.90. Droste, R. L., 1997, Theory and Practice of Water and Wastewater Treatment, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 287354. Eckenfelder, W. W., Jr., 1989, Industrial Water Pollution Control, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 53-69; 317-322. Geankoplis, C. J., 1993, Transport Processes and Unit Operations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 815-828.

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Metcalf & Eddy, 1991, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal, and Reuse, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 220-240; 472485; 580-591. Sundstrom, D. W. and Klei, H. E., 1979, Wastewater Treatment, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 187-208. Weber, W. J., Jr., 1972, Physicochemical Process for Water Quality Control, Wiley-Interscience, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 111-138.

Wentz, C. W., 1995, Hazardous Waste Management, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 190-193.

PIERO M. ARMENANTE NJIT

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen