Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
http://www.credit-suisse.com/researchandanalytics
The EM worlds short-term growth indicators have become more encouraging over the past two months. Most importantly, the forward-looking PMI new orders data for the EM world as a whole have bounced somewhat from their low point in late 2011. However, the backward-looking IP growth numbers for the EM world have yet to show a convincing bounce. When we exclude the volatile figures for India, Thailand and Singapore from our aggregate EM growth measure, we find that sequential worldwide EM IP growth remained largely stable at about 5% between April 2011 and January 2012. Our measures of three-month headline and core inflation for the EM world as a whole have continued to trend down in recent months. We saw divergent patterns in different EM countries in the second half of 2011 when local food and energy prices rose substantially in some countries in response to currency depreciation, but data for the first two months of 2012 show a tendency for inflation to come back down again in those countries.
ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS AND IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES ARE IN THE DISCLOSURE APPENDIX. FOR OTHER IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES, PLEASE REFER TO https://firesearchdisclosure.credit-suisse.com.
14 March 2012
14 March 2012
Table of Contents
Moderately encouraging EM PMI data alongside stability in EM core inflation Summary PMIs signaling stronger sequential growth mainly in Asia EM inflation generally looking benign EM currencies: responding to a pickup in global risk appetite Latin America Argentina: More interventionism, less growth Brazil: We expect additional Selic interest rate cuts of 125bps in Q2 2012 Chile: Shifting focus from rate cuts to inflation Colombia: Overcoming the global headwinds Mexico: A strong start in 2012, but will it last? Panama: Slowing from double-digit growth Peru: No sharp slowdown here Venezuela: Will he or wont he? Europe, Middle East and Africa Hungary: Waiting for Godot? Israel: Robust economy with geopolitical concerns Poland: Still the growth champion in Europe? Russia: A fresh chance for reform post-elections South Africa: Reasons to be positive Turkey: A temporary soft patch Ukraine: Left to her own devices? Non-Japan Asia China: Improved liquidity, but not demand Hong Kong: Property bounces but not for long India: A cyclical sweet spot 5 5 7 10 15 21 22 27 32 36 40 45 49 53 58 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 96 101 105
14 March 2012
Indonesia: All about inflation Korea: Growth has troughed, rates on hold Malaysia: Outperform till the next election? Philippines: Promising signs emerging Singapore: Higher wage growth ahead? Taiwan: Emerging from a technical recession Thailand: Investment leads the way Long-term sovereign FX debt ratings Key websites Previous publications Key dates Gross financing needs for 2012 Balance of payments financing needs Government funding needs Quarterly and annual forecasts for developed countries Summary macroeconomic data for developed countries Summary macroeconomic data
110 115 120 124 128 132 137 141 143 149 157 162 163 176 186 187 192
14 March 2012
Summary
Overview: The EM worlds short-term growth indicators have become more encouraging over the past two months. Most importantly, the forward-looking PMI new orders data for the EM world as a whole have bounced somewhat from their low point in late 2011 (Exhibit 1). However, the backward-looking IP growth numbers for the EM world have yet to show a convincing bounce. When we exclude the volatile figures for India, Thailand and Singapore from our aggregate EM growth measure, we find that sequential worldwide EM IP growth remained largely stable at about 5% between April 2011 and January 2012 (Exhibit 2). Our measures of three-month headline and core inflation for the EM world as a whole have continued to trend down in recent months. We saw divergent patterns in different EM countries in the second half of 2011 when local food and energy prices rose substantially in some countries in response to currency depreciation, but data for the first two months of 2012 show a tendency for inflation to come back down again in those countries.
Exhibit 1: The EM worlds PMI indices for new orders have move up from their 2011 lows in the most recent months, especially in non-Japan Asia and Latin America
Seasonally adjusted regional indices for PMI new orders. See the footnote below regarding the GDP-weighting of country-specific observations. PMI new orders indices are lead indicators for sequential industrial production growth.
Exhibit 2: Sequential EM industrial production growth remained stable in January 2012 (on a measure that excludes the volatile figures for India, Thailand and Singapore from the calculation), but the PMIs indicate that EM growth is about to bounce
The dark thick line shows (using the left hand scale) the annualized % change in the seasonally adjusted industrial production level for the EM world as a whole during the last three months. The line with the diamonds shows the same growth concept for the EM world excluding India, Thailand and Singapore. The other two lines show PMI new orders indices (using the right hand scale).
65 60 55 50 45 40 35 Feb-10 LatAm new orders EMEA new orders NJA new orders
65 60 55 50 45 40 35 Feb-12
65 60 55 50 Aug-10 Feb-11 Aug-11 Feb-12 45 EM IP, 3m% ann.* (left scale) EM IP ex-IN, SG, TH, 3m% ann.* (left scale) EM new orders** (right scale) Global new orders (right scale) 40 35
Aug-10
Feb-11
Aug-11
*Observations for 13 countries were taken into account and weighted by the countries 2010 nominal GDP. The countries are listed in footnotes of Exhibits 7-9. Source: PMI Premium, Haver Analytics, Credit Suisse
*Observations for 20 countries (listed in footnotes below Exhibits 7-9) were weighted by the countries 2010 nominal GDP. The figures were seasonally and workday-adjusted. **The index takes into account PMI readings for Brazil, Mexico, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Turkey, China, India, Korea, Singapore and Taiwan.. Source: PMI Premium, Haver Analytics, Credit Suisse
While backwardlooking IP growth for the EM world is yet to bounce notably, the PMI data suggest that it will
Growth: The forward-looking PMI new orders index for the EM world rose encouragingly in December and January and remained at the new and moderately higher level in February, suggesting that some strengthening of the sequential IP growth figures should become visible in the forthcoming data releases (Exhibits 1 and 2) it isnt truly visible at this stage. While our three-month measure of growth in industrial production (IP) for the EM world as a whole bounced sharply in December 2011 and January 2012 after staying in a narrow range at an unsatisfactory low level for nearly a year (Exhibits 2 and 5), this reflects temporarily extra-ordinarily high month-on-month figures for India, Thailand and Singapore. If we exclude those figures from the aggregates, we find that EM IP growth remained stable in Q4 2011 and in January 2012 (the latest available observation). 5
14 March 2012
The growth trends differ across regions. China has just released revised IP figures for the past year. The updated series shows a gradual decline in Chinas three-month annualized rate of IP growth to 8.4% in February 2012 from 12.7% in the middle of 2011 and 19.8% at the end of 2010 (Exhibit 10). In non-Japan Asia outside of China (an area in which India and Korea are the largest economies), the annualized three-month rate of IP growth jumped massively into positive territory in December 2011 and January 2012, under the influence of one-off factors that are discussed below. In the EMEA area, annualized threemonth IP growth slowed sharply to about 1% in January 2012 from more than 8% in late 2011. In Latin America, Brazils IP growth remains very weak but Mexicos has bounced. Sequential EM inflation continued to decline in December 2011 and January 2012 Inflation: After remaining stable for a few months, our measures of three-month EM headline and core inflation resumed their decline in the three months from December to February, helped by particularly large falls in inflation in China and India (Exhibit 3). Threemonth inflation in the rest of the EM world rose notably towards the end of last year but came off again in January and February (Exhibit 4). This reflects in part the temporary impact (on food and energy price inflation) of last years EM currency depreciation against the dollar and the euro an effect that has subsequently been mostly reversed.
Exhibit 3: Our sequential measure of EM headline inflation has been declining since December after remaining stable for a few months
Annualized % change in the seasonally adjusted CPI indices for the EM world as a whole over the last three months
Exhibit 4: : In the EM world outside of China and India, a spike in food inflation drove up headline inflation in late 2011, but headline inflation fell back again in January and February 2012
Annualized % change in the seasonally adjusted CPI indices for the EM world excluding China and India over the last three months
18 15 12 9 6 3 0 Aug-09
18 15 12 9 6 3 0
18 15 12 9 6 3 0 Aug-09
18 15 12 9 6 3 0
Feb-10
Aug-10
Feb-11
Aug-11
Feb-12
Feb-10
Aug-10
Feb-11
Aug-11
Feb-12
*For headline inflation, 31 countries are taken into account and weighted by their 2010 nominal GDP. These countries are listed in the footnotes for Exhibits 27-29. Argentina is not included. For India, the index used is the WPI. **For core inflation (defined here to be the change in the CPI index excluding food, energy, alcohol and tobacco), 21 countries are taken into account and weighted by their 2010 nominal GDP. These countries are listed in the footnotes for Exhibits 27-29. For India, the index used is the WPI. Source: Haver Analytics, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, Credit Suisse.
* For headline inflation, the same 31 countries are taken into account as in Exhibits 27-29 excluding China, India and Argentina. The countries are listed in footnotes to the latter charts. **For core inflation (defined here to be the change in the CPI index excluding food, energy, alcohol and tobacco), we use the same subset of EM countries as in Exhibit 22, but excluding India and China. Source: Haver Analytics, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, Credit Suisse.
Recovering EM currencies
Exchange rates: Most EM currencies have recovered a lot of ground against the dollar and the euro so far this year. At this stage only a short list of EM countries has currencies which in REER terms remain more than 3% cheap to the levels that prevailed in mid2011: Hungary, Brazil, Israel, Mexico, Poland, Romania and India.
14 March 2012
Exhibit 5: While three-month IP growth has continued to weaken in EMEA and China in recent months, it has recovered sharply in other parts of Asia while remaining largely unchanged (at zero) in Latin America
Annualized % change in the industrial production level (sa) over the last three months preceding each observation point in the chart.
Exhibit 6: Three-month IP growth has recovered to a decently strong rate in the US and but has continued to decline (from very high levels) in China
Annualized % change in the industrial production level (sa) over the last three months preceding each observation point in the chart.
40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 Jan-10 LatAm EMEA NJA NJA ex-China NJA ex-China, Singapore & Thailand Jul-10 Jan-11 Jul-11 Jan-12
30 20 10 0 -10 -20
*Observations for 19 countries were taken into account and weighted by the countries 2010 nominal GDP. The countries are listed in footnotes of Exhibits 7-9. Source: Haver Analytics, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, Credit Suisse
EM output growth is, in our view, likely to be supported in the coming quarters by the already visible positive growth momentum in the US, a policy-induced bottoming out of growth in China, recent central bank policy easing across much of the rest of the EM world, and global commodity price stability. The main risk to this view is probably that the assumed commodity price stability may not materialize. Higher global oil and food prices could be a significant growth impediment.
To be exact, we define the run rate or the three-month growth rate as the annualized three-month moving average of the month-on-month growth rates in the seasonally adjusted IP series.
14 March 2012
Exhibit 7: Latin America IP, mfg PMI and US ISM new orders
70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35
LatAm PMI** LatAm new orders** US new orders LatAm IP, 3m% ann.* (rhs)
Exhibit 8: EMEA IP, mfg PMI and euro zone new orders
70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35
EMEA mfg PMI** EMEA new orders** Eurozone new orders EMEA IP, 3m% ann.* (rhs)
Exhibit 9: NJA ex-China IP, mfg PMI and global new orders
70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 20 10 0 -10
NJA ex-China PMI** NJA ex-China new orders** -20 Global new orders NJA ex-Ch IP, 3m% ann.* (rhs)
30 20 10 0 -10 -20
30 20 10 0 -10 -20
30 20 10 0 -10
China PMI** China new orders** China IP, 3m% ann.* (rhs)
-20
30 20 10 0 -10 -20
15 10 5 0 -5 -10
20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15
14 March 2012
Q1 10 Latin America* Argentina(1) Brazil Chile Colombia Mexico EMEA* Czech Republic Hungary Poland Romania Russia South Africa Turkey Ukraine Non-Japan Asia* NJA excl China China India(2) Korea Malaysia Singapore Taiwan Thailand EM World* 11.2 13.1 18.2 -5.8 3.9 4.8 10.1 6.9 5.1 10.2 4.3 9.5 4.1 17.3 11.2 20.7 22.4 19.8 14.0 25.7 10.7 37.2 48.8 31.2 16.8
Q2 10 11.2 9.4 14.3 6.1 7.6 8.2 11.5 11.5 13.5 12.5 6.8 10.9 8.7 13.8 13.3 16.3 16.9 15.9 9.6 18.8 10.6 45.3 29.7 17.6 14.4
Q3 10 7.1 6.8 8.0 6.8 3.5 6.5 8.1 10.7 12.9 11.9 4.5 6.5 4.6 10.0 9.0 12.1 9.8 13.5 6.8 10.9 4.2 13.7 18.8 9.8 10.3
Q4 10 4.2 5.9 3.3 5.4 4.4 5.0 8.4 11.9 10.5 9.8 6.3 6.7 2.8 12.1 11.5 12.3 10.6 13.3 8.6 11.8 3.7 25.7 17.7 2.6 9.8
Q1 11 4.5 4.4 2.8 14.5 5.5 5.4 8.9 12.3 12.6 9.0 11.4 6.0 4.9 14.4 10.3 12.4 8.9 14.4 7.9 10.4 2.4 19.0 15.3 -2.2 10.3
Q2 11 2.4 5.8 0.6 7.4 3.4 3.4 5.5 9.1 4.3 5.4 4.0 4.8 0.7 8.0 8.5 10.8 5.1 13.9 7.0 7.1 -1.6 -3.8 7.1 -2.5 8.2
Q3 11 2.0 4.5 0.0 4.4 6.1 3.5 5.4 3.7 2.7 5.7 5.5 5.0 2.6 7.6 9.2 10.2 4.0 13.8 3.2 5.3 2.0 8.9 3.4 1.8 7.6
Q4 11 Jan 11 Feb 11 0.4 2.1 -2.0 2.0 4.4 3.2 4.4 3.1 3.0 7.5 2.2 3.3 2.1 6.4 3.3 7.8 -0.5 12.8 1.1 5.0 2.8 9.3 -4.0 -34.2 5.6 -0.1 -0.9 -3.4 3.6 na 4.2 3.5 3.1 -0.4 9.1 1.2 3.8 2.4 1.4 2.0 7.0 -1.3 11.4 6.8 -2.0 0.3 -8.7 -16.5 -15.2 5.1 na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na 11.4 na na na na na na na
30 20
(1) Argentinean IP data are privately collected by FIEL. (2) We use the IP series for India with the base year FY2004 = 100. *The regional aggregate is calculated by weighting each countrys IP data by its 2010 nominal GDP. Source: Haver Analytics, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, Credit Suisse
70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35
Hungary mfg PMI Hungary new orders Hungary IP, 3m % ann.* (rhs)
30 20 10 0 -10 -20
-20 -30
14 March 2012
Core inflation Core inflation remains notably well-behaved in most countries. Our sequential annualized remains well three-month measure (the run-rate) of core inflation for the EM world excluding China behaved and India hovered in a narrow range of about 5.0%-5.5% between April and December 2011, but fell in the first two months of 2012 to reach 3.8% in February (Exhibit 23). Interestingly, our measure of the run-rate of Chinas core inflation fell almost all the way to zero in November and December after having hovered at much higher levels earlier in 2011. This is consistent with the longer-term experience, which suggests that food inflation, which has recently fallen sharply in China, is an important influence on that countrys core inflation. However, the runrate measure of Chinas core inflation picked up moderately to 1.7% in February from its recent low of 0.4% in December 2011. From a forward-looking perspective, we think it makes sense to expect the impact of currency depreciation on inflation to continue to be reversed in response to the recent strengthening of many EM currencies, and to expect the recent sharp decline in food price inflation in China to be a one-off effect that will depress headline inflation less and less over time.
Exhibit 22: Our sequential measure of EM headline inflation declined in January and February after remaining stable for a few months
Annualized % change in the seasonally adjusted CPI indices for the EM world as a whole over the last three months
Exhibit 23: In the EM world outside of China and India, a spike in food inflation drove up headline inflation in late 2011, but this effect has been reversed in January and February 2012
Annualized % change in the seasonally adjusted CPI indices for the EM world excluding China and India over the last three months
18 15 12 9 6 3 0 Aug-09
18 15 12 9 6 3 0
18 15 12 9 6 3 0 Aug-09
18 15 12 9 6 3 0
Feb-10
Aug-10
Feb-11
Aug-11
Feb-12
Feb-10
Aug-10
Feb-11
Aug-11
Feb-12
*For headline inflation, 31 countries are taken into account and weighted by their 2010 nominal GDP. These countries are listed in the footnotes for Exhibits 27 -29. Argentina is not included. For India, the index used is the WPI. **For core inflation (defined here to be the change in the CPI index excluding food, energy, alcohol and tobacco), 21 countries are taken into account and weighted by their 2010 nominal GDP. These countries are listed in the footnotes for Exhibits 27-29. For India, the index used is the WPI. Source: Haver Analytics, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, Credit Suisse.
* For headline inflation, the same 31 countries are taken into account as in Exhibits 27 - 29 excluding China, India and Argentina. The countries are listed in footnotes to the latter charts. **For core inflation (defined here to be the change in the CPI index excluding food, energy, alcohol and tobacco), we use the same subset of EM countries as in Exhibit 22, but excluding India and China. Source: Haver Analytics, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, Credit Suisse.
These statements are based on our estimate of sequential inflation for the EM world as a whole. We refer to our measure of sequential inflation as "the run-rate of consumer prices" defined as the annualized % change during the most recent three months in the GDP-weighted average of seasonally adjusted price indices for the EM countries.
10
14 March 2012
180 120 60
110 70
13-Sep-10
13-Sep-10
* Index that attributes equal weight to US wholesale prices for wheat, corn, soy and rice prices measured in US$ Source: the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service
Exhibit 28: Emerging Europe, Middle East and Africa CPI inflation*
Annualized % 3-month change in the CPI (sa)
20 15 10 5 0 Feb-08
Headline CPI* (left axis) Core CPI** (left axis) Food CPI (right axis)
40 30 20
20 15 10 5
Headline CPI* (left axis) Core CPI** (left axis) Food CPI (right axis)
40 30 20 10 0
20 15 10 5 0 -5 Feb-08
Headline CPI* (left axis) Core CPI** (left axis) Food CPI (right axis)
40 30 20 10 0
10 0 Feb-12
0 -5 Feb-08
Jun-09
Oct-10
Jun-09
Oct-10
-10 Feb-12
Jun-09
Oct-10
-10 Feb-12
* The aggregates in this chart exclude Argentina. The 8 countries that are taken into account and weighted by 2010 nominal GDP are Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Panama, Peru and Venezuela. ** Core inflation excludes food, energy, alcohol and tobacco; only for a selected subset of four of the eight Latin American countries listed above. These are Brazil, Chile, Mexico and Peru. Source: Haver Analytics, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, Credit Suisse
* The 12 countries that are taken into account and weighted by 2010 nominal GDP are Czech Republic, Egypt, Hungary, Israel, Kazakhstan, Nigeria, Poland, Romania, Russia, South Africa, Turkey and Ukraine. ** Core inflation excludes food, energy, alcohol and tobacco; only for nine EMEA countries listed above. These are Czech Republic, Hungary, Israel, Kazakhstan, Poland, Romania, Russia, South Africa and Turkey. Source: Haver Analytics, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, Credit Suisse
* The 11 countries that are taken into account and weighted by 2010 nominal GDP are China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam. For India, the price index used is the WPI. ** Core inflation excludes food, energy, alcohol and tobacco; only for eight non-Japan Asian countries listed above. These are China, Hong Kong, India, Korea, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand. Source: Haver Analytics, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, Credit Suisse
20 15 10 5 0 -5 Feb-08
Headline CPI (left axis) Core CPI* (left axis) Food CPI (right axis)
40 30 20 10 0
20 15 10 5 0 -5 Feb-08
Headline CPI (left axis) Core CPI* (left axis) Food CPI (right axis)
40 30 20 10 0
20 15 10 5 0 -5 Feb-08
Headline CPI (left axis) Core CPI* (left axis) Food CPI (right axis)
40 30 20 10 0
Jun-09
Oct-10
-10 Feb-12
Jun-09
Oct-10
-10 Feb-12
Jun-09
Oct-10
-10 Feb-12
*Index calculated by Credit Suisse: excludes food and beverages, fuels and energy and fuels for personal transport. Source: Haver Analytics, IBGE, Credit Suisse
*Index calculated by Credit Suisse: excludes food and beverages, tobacco, electricity and fuels. Source: Haver Analytics, Banxico, Credit Suisse
*Index calculated by Eurostat: excludes food, energy, alcohol and tobacco. Source: Haver Analytics, Eurostat, Credit Suisse
11
14 March 2012
20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 Feb-08
Headline CPI (left axis) Core CPI* (left axis) Food CPI (right axis)
40 30 20 10 0 -10
15 10 5 0 -5 Feb-08
Headline CPI (left axis) Core CPI* (left axis) Food CPI (right axis)
30 20 10 0
25 20 15 10 5 0
Headline CPI (left axis) Core CPI* (left axis) Food CPI (right axis)
50 40 30 20 10 0
Jun-09
Oct-10
-20 Feb-12
Jun-09
Oct-10
-10 Feb-12
-5 Feb-08
Jun-09
Oct-10
-10 Feb-12
*Index calculated by Eurostat: excludes food, energy, alcohol and tobacco. Source: Haver Analytics, Eurostat, Credit Suisse
*Index calculated by Eurostat: excludes food, energy, alcohol and tobacco. Source: Haver Analytics, Eurostat, Credit Suisse
*Index calculated by Credit Suisse: excludes food, alcohol, tobacco, gasoline and utilities. Source: Haver Analytics, Credit Suisse
20 15 10 5 0 -5 Jan-08
Headline CPI (left axis) Core CPI* (left axis) Food CPI (right axis)
40 30 20 10 0
25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 Feb-08
Headline CPI (left axis) Core CPI* (left axis)* Food CPI (right axis)
50 40 30 20 10 0 -10
15 10 5 0 -5 -10 Jan-08
Headline CPI (left axis) Core CPI* (left axis)* Food CPI (right axis)
30 20 10 0 -10
May-09
Sep-10
-10 Jan-12
Jun-09
Oct-10
-20 Feb-12
May-09
Sep-10
-20 Jan-12
*Index calculated by Credit Suisse: excludes food and nonalcoholic beverages, electricity and other fuels, petrol, alcohol and tobacco. Source: Haver Analytics, Statistics South Africa, Credit Suisse
*Index excluding food, energy, alcohol, tobacco and gold. Source: Haver Analytics, Turkstat, Credit Suisse
*Index as calculated by Credit Suisse: excludes food, energy, alcohol and tobacco. Source: Haver Analytics, Central Bureau of Statistics, Credit Suisse
Jun-09
Oct-10
Jun-09
Oct-10
Jun-09
Oct-10
*Index as calculated by Credit Suisse: excludes food and energy. Source: Haver Analytics, National Bureau of Statistics, Credit Suisse
*Index calculated by Credit Suisse: based on the WPI excluding primary food articles, manufactured food products, fuel and power, beverages and tobacco. **Index calculated by Credit Suisse: based on the mfg WPI excluding manufactured food products. Source: Haver Analytics, Credit Suisse
*Index calculated by Credit Suisse: excludes food and nonalcoholic beverages, alcohol and tobacco, electricity, gas and other fuels and fuels for transport equipment. Source: Haver Analytics, National Statistical Office, Credit Suisse
12
14 March 2012
Q4 2009 Latin America* Argentina** Brazil Chile Colombia Mexico Panama Peru Venezuela EMEA* Czech Republic Egypt Hungary Israel Kazakhstan Nigeria Poland Romania Russia South Africa Turkey Ukraine EM Asia* EM Asia ex- China and India* China Hong Kong India Indonesia Korea Malaysia Philippines Singapore Taiwan Thailand Vietnam EM* EM ex- China and India* 5.7 16.1 4.2 -1.9 2.4 4.0 1.3 0.4 26.0 7.2 0.4 13.1 5.2 3.6 6.0 12.7 3.3 4.6 9.2 6.0 5.7 13.3 1.4 1.6 0.7 1.6 4.5 2.6 2.4 -0.2 2.9 -0.8 -1.3 1.9 5.2 3.6 5.1
Q1 2010 6.6 19.4 4.9 -0.3 2.0 4.8 2.9 0.7 25.1 7.1 0.7 12.8 6.0 3.5 7.3 14.9 3.0 4.6 7.2 5.7 9.3 11.2 3.4 3.0 2.2 2.1 9.6 3.7 3.0 1.4 4.3 0.9 1.3 3.7 9.5 4.9 5.8
Q2 2010 7.2 21.4 5.1 1.2 2.1 4.0 2.9 1.1 31.0 6.2 1.2 10.3 5.3 2.9 7.0 14.0 2.3 4.4 5.9 4.5 9.2 8.3 4.0 3.1 2.9 2.8 10.5 4.4 2.6 1.7 4.3 3.1 1.1 3.2 9.9 5.2 5.7
Q3 2010 7.1 23.0 4.6 2.2 2.3 3.7 3.7 2.2 29.3 6.1 1.9 10.7 3.8 2.0 6.6 13.4 2.2 7.5 6.2 3.5 8.4 8.5 4.2 3.4 3.5 1.6 9.3 6.2 2.9 1.9 4.2 3.4 0.4 3.3 9.4 5.3 5.7
Q4 2010 7.8 23.7 5.6 2.5 2.7 4.2 4.4 2.1 27.2 6.8 2.1 10.6 4.3 2.4 7.5 12.6 2.9 7.9 8.1 3.5 7.4 9.5 5.0 3.8 4.7 2.7 8.9 6.3 3.2 2.0 3.6 4.0 1.1 2.9 11.2 6.0 6.3
Q1 2011 7.9 21.8 6.1 2.9 3.3 3.5 5.1 2.4 28.2 6.9 1.7 11.3 4.2 4.0 8.5 12.0 3.8 7.6 9.5 3.8 4.3 7.7 5.6 4.4 5.1 3.8 9.6 6.8 3.8 2.8 4.5 5.2 1.3 3.0 12.8 6.4 6.6
Q2 2011 7.9 21.4 6.6 3.3 3.0 3.3 6.4 3.1 23.1 7.4 1.8 11.9 4.0 4.1 8.3 11.3 4.6 8.2 9.5 4.6 5.9 10.8 6.1 4.7 5.7 5.2 9.6 5.9 4.0 3.3 5.0 4.7 1.6 4.1 19.4 6.8 6.9
Q3 2011 8.6 21.6 7.1 3.1 3.5 3.4 5.6 3.5 25.8 6.6 1.8 9.0 3.4 3.2 8.9 9.7 4.1 4.2 8.1 5.4 6.4 8.4 6.4 4.8 6.3 6.4 9.7 4.7 4.3 3.4 4.9 5.5 1.3 4.1 22.5 7.0 6.8
Q4 2011 8.6 20.9 6.7 4.0 3.9 3.5 6.4 4.5 27.4 6.6 2.4 8.5 4.1 2.5 7.8 10.5 4.6 3.4 6.7 6.1 9.2 5.0 5.3 4.4 4.6 5.7 8.9 4.1 4.0 3.2 4.7 5.5 1.4 4.0 19.8 6.3 6.7
Dec 11 8.7 21.2 6.5 4.4 3.7 3.8 6.3 4.7 27.6 6.6 2.4 9.5 4.1 2.2 7.4 10.3 4.6 3.1 6.1 6.1 10.4 4.6 4.7 4.3 4.1 5.7 7.5 3.8 4.2 3.0 4.2 5.5 2.0 3.5 18.1 6.0 6.7
Jan 11 8.4 20.7 6.2 4.2 3.6 4.0 6.1 4.2 26.0 5.9 3.5 8.6 5.5 2.0 5.9 12.6 4.1 2.7 4.2 6.3 10.6 3.7 4.7 4.1 4.5 6.1 6.6 3.7 3.4 2.7 4.0 4.8 2.4 3.4 17.3 5.9 6.3
Feb 11 8.3 21.4 5.8 4.4 3.6 3.9 6.4 4.2 25.3 5.8 3.7 9.2 5.9 na 4.7 na 4.3 2.6 3.7 na 10.4 3.0 3.9 3.6 3.2 na 7.0 3.6 3.1 na 2.7 na 0.3 3.3 16.4 5.4 6.1
*The regional aggregates are calculated by weighting each countrys inflation data by 2010 nominal GDP. **For Argentina we use unofficial headline CPI data supplied by Haver Analytics. Source: Haver Analytics, Credit Suisse
13
14 March 2012
Q4 2009 Latin America* Brazil Chile Mexico Peru Venezuela EMEA* Czech Republic Hungary Israel Kazakhstan Poland Romania Russia South Africa Turkey** EM Asia* EM Asia ex- China and India* China*** Hong Kong India Indonesia**** Korea Philippines*** Singapore Taiwan Thailand EM* EM ex- China and India* 5.3 4.6 -1.3 3.9 0.7 27.6 6.4 0.3 5.2 4.1 9.8 2.7 5.4 10.1 6.2 4.0 0.1 1.0 -0.6 1.0 1.8 4.4 2.3 2.8 0.3 -1.2 -0.9 2.6 4.7
Q1 2010 5.6 4.8 -1.3 4.3 0.9 27.0 4.7 -0.2 5.0 3.5 9.1 2.2 2.6 6.2 5.0 4.4 1.3 1.2 0.3 0.2 5.3 4.0 2.3 3.5 0.5 -0.3 -0.3 2.9 4.2
Q2 2010 5.7 4.7 -0.2 4.1 0.9 27.8 3.9 0.0 4.0 3.2 7.7 1.2 3.0 4.5 3.8 5.3 2.0 1.5 0.9 0.9 7.2 3.8 1.9 3.9 2.4 0.0 0.7 3.2 4.0
Q3 2010 5.9 5.0 1.6 3.9 1.1 26.3 3.4 0.1 1.6 2.3 6.8 0.9 4.8 4.1 3.0 4.1 2.1 1.7 1.1 -0.6 6.9 4.1 1.9 4.0 3.3 0.5 1.1 3.2 3.9
Q4 2010 5.8 4.9 2.0 3.8 1.3 24.8 3.1 0.0 1.5 2.1 6.5 0.9 4.7 4.1 3.0 2.7 2.6 1.9 1.5 1.7 8.2 4.3 1.7 3.4 4.7 0.6 1.0 3.4 3.8
Q1 2011 6.0 5.4 2.2 3.0 1.9 25.4 3.5 -0.3 1.4 3.3 6.2 1.3 4.6 4.6 2.7 3.6 3.4 2.2 2.2 3.0 9.4 4.3 2.2 3.5 5.9 0.6 0.8 4.0 4.1
Q2 2011 5.9 5.6 2.4 2.3 2.1 23.6 4.0 -0.3 1.7 3.2 5.7 1.9 3.7 5.2 3.1 4.8 3.5 2.5 2.4 4.1 8.9 4.6 2.7 3.6 4.9 0.8 0.5 4.1 4.4
Q3 2011 Q4 20101 6.3 6.1 2.1 2.2 2.5 24.7 4.5 -0.2 1.7 2.9 5.9 2.1 2.5 5.8 3.6 6.2 3.6 2.8 2.4 6.8 8.7 4.9 2.7 3.5 5.8 0.7 0.5 4.4 4.8 6.7 6.4 2.9 2.3 2.7 25.3 5.0 0.3 2.2 2.6 5.1 2.8 2.6 5.9 3.6 8.0 3.0 2.7 1.9 5.6 7.4 4.4 2.8 3.7 5.5 0.7 0.5 4.3 5.1
Dec 11 6.7 6.4 3.3 2.4 2.7 25.4 5.1 0.5 2.2 2.2 5.5 3.2 2.8 5.9 3.7 8.1 2.7 2.7 1.6 5.7 6.6 4.3 2.9 3.4 5.6 0.5 0.5 4.1 5.2
Jan 12 6.3 5.9 3.2 2.4 2.4 24.2 5.3 1.5 3.5 1.9 5.0 2.8 2.9 6.1 4.2 8.4 2.6 2.7 1.6 6.1 5.8 4.3 2.6 3.4 4.6 1.6 0.5 4.0 5.1
Feb 12 6.0 5.5 3.5 2.3 2.4 22.9 5.1 1.8 3.9 na 3.8 2.8 2.9 5.9 na 8.1 2.2 2.3 1.4 na 5.0 4.3 2.5 na na -0.8 0.4 3.7 4.8
*The regional aggregates are calculated by weighting each countrys inflation data by 2010 nominal GDP. **Official core excluding energy, food, beverages, tobacco and gold. ***Core inflation measured by CPI exc. food and energy. ****Official core inflation measured by CPI exc. food (volatile good) and energy, fuel, transportation and water supply (administered commodities). Source: Haver Analytics, National authorities, Credit Suisse
14
14 March 2012
Exhibit 44: Deviation of 12 March 2012 REERs from the fair-value estimates*
Number of standard deviations
3
REER is more than one standard deviation stronger than the "fair value" REER
2 1 0
Colombia Czech Rep. Brazil Singapore Egypt Philippines Venezuela
REER is within (+/-) one standard deviation of the "fair value" REER REER is more than one standard deviation weaker than the "fair value" REER
Turkey
Argentina
Indonesia
Russia
Thailand
S. Africa
Israel
Romania
Mexico
S. Arabia
Hungary
Chile
Malaysia
Kazakhstan
Korea
Hong Kong
Taiwan
China
Peru
Poland
Ukraine
India
-1 -2 -3
* January 2012 REER was used for Israel and Peru. ** Argentinas REER for the period starting from January 2005 was estimated using unofficial inflation data supplied by Haver Analytics. Source: Credit Suisse
A simpler and less adequate valuation model is one that focuses exclusively on the real (i.e., inflation-adjusted) effective (i.e., trade-weighted) exchange rate (REER). A possible valuation guide from this model comes from a comparison of the current REER level with the average REER level in the past five years. This comparison is shown in the fourth column of Exhibit 45 below. At this stage only a short list of EM countries has currencies in REER terms remain more than 3% cheap to the levels that prevailed in mid-2011, includes Hungary, Brazil, Israel, Mexico, Poland, and India.
The model's estimated coefficients were recalibrated in June 2011 by incorporating 2010 data into the sample.
15
14 March 2012
12 March 2012 % chg 12 Mar 2012 over 13 Feb 2012 1 month chg Argentina** Brazil Chile China Colombia Czech Republic Egypt Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Kazakhstan Korea Malaysia Mexico Nigeria Philippines Poland Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Singapore South Africa Taiwan Thailand Turkey Ukraine United Kingdom United States Euro Japan 0.5 -5.0 0.2 0.4 1.3 1.4 0.8 0.8 -1.1 -1.0 -0.2 0.4 0.8 1.0 0.6 1.5 0.6 1.5 0.0 1.8 1.4 0.4 2.8 1.1 1.8 -1.2 0.8 -0.2 0.6 0.0 -5.4 % chg 12 Mar 2012 over 14 Mar 2011 1 year chg 10.7 -4.9 1.6 5.9 8.6 -1.7 6.7 0.7 -7.5 -5.0 -1.9 5.8 1.2 0.5 -4.2 3.7 3.0 -2.0 -4.1 2.4 5.5 3.0 -5.3 -1.4 0.0 -3.0 5.3 1.6 1.7 -3.6 -3.4 -21.6 -1.9 2.9 6.3 5.1 0.3 1.8 -1.8 -5.6 -5.1 -1.8 4.2 0.5 0.9 0.2 4.6 3.1 -2.2 -1.2 7.0 1.8 6.7 -2.5 -0.2 -0.2 -10.7 0.3 2.1 -3.3 -3.0 -3.5 -10.4 13.1 6.2 12.4 19.7 5.5 20.1 -6.3 -5.4 6.5 5.5 5.8 -9.8 3.4 -1.1 10.5 6.4 -3.5 -6.1 15.0 6.4 12.4 7.2 -3.4 1.6 -5.7 -3.9 -8.0 -6.7 -7.8 5.0 -14.4 34.7 11.1 16.2 32.1 15.9 25.1 -14.9 -1.6 10.6 14.3 12.3 -9.7 3.1 -5.5 23.3 16.7 -1.4 2.0 29.8 1.8 14.1 5.8 -8.8 9.5 4.0 -3.7 -13.6 -12.9 -6.0 -1.4 -35.9 25.9 9.0 23.1 30.8 38.7 34.7 -21.4 11.8 15.9 11.2 32.0 -11.8 -3.2 -1.6 35.1 13.3 9.8 18.5 66.6 -2.7 11.0 -5.0 -18.2 5.0 17.6 6.3 -14.6 -12.0 -8.8 -10.2 % chg 12 Mar 2012 over 1yr average % chg 12 Mar 2012 over 5yr average % chg 12 Mar % chg 12 Mar 2012 over 10yr 2012 over 20yr average average
*Inflation-adjusted, trade-weighted exchange rate; figures in bold are more than one standard deviation from the average REER change across the included countries ** Argentinas REER for the period starting from January 2005 was estimated using unofficial inflation data supplied by Haver Analytics Source: Credit Suisse
16
14 March 2012
110 100 90 80 70 60 50
110 100 90 80 70 60 50
Feb-02
Feb-07
* Argentinas REER for the period starting from January 2005 was estimated using unofficial inflation data supplied by Haver Analytics Source: Haver Analytics, Credit Suisse
17
14 March 2012
100 90 80 70
100 90
110 95 80
110 95 80 65 50 35
80 70
65 50 35
110 100 90 80 70 60
110 100
105 95
105 95 85 75
85
130 110 90 70
130 110 90
70
95
18
14 March 2012
130 110 90 70
130 110 90 70
110 100 90 80 70 60
110 100 90 80 70 60
92 88 84 80 76 72 68 64 12Mar12
19
14 March 2012
96 92 88 84 80 76 72 68 12Mar12
20
14 March 2012
Latin America
21
14 March 2012
The governments interventionism in the economy has increased significantly over the past quarter. Three months ago, when President Cristina Kirchner was sworn in for a new term, she signaled a moderation in policy, referring to a fine-tuning of the model. We still think that her government is committed to some of the initiatives that it announced late last year, such as the reduction of the fiscal deficit (by lowering the subsidy bill) and the moderation of wage inflation. However, the government is also implementing a number of less desirable measures, in our view, aimed at fostering domestic production and investment: import controls, quasi-restrictions on the payment of dividends by corporations and banks, and rhetorical attacks and political pressure against the repatriation of profits by foreign-owned companies. We think that the governments efforts to influence domestic economic activity may backfire and, thus, we are now less optimistic about the growth outlook. Unsurprisingly, some of the recent measures are already having negative consequences. For example, there is anecdotal evidence of shortages of and/or higher prices for a number of consumer products (which may also be dampening consumer sentiment) and for intermediate and capital goods imports (which are disrupting the chain of production). Business sentiment likely weakened in the past few weeks on persistent speculation about a takeover by the federal government of one of the foreignowned oil companies operating in Argentina. Regional political allies of the Kirchner government are also putting pressure on foreign companies to invest more, particularly in the oil and gas sector. The government seems to think that its measures and political pressure will result in higher investment by the private sector. However, we see the risk of the opposite: that all these maneuvers will discourage the large investments that Argentina needs to sustain high GDP growth rates over the medium term. We still expect the national accounts to show real GDP growth of 5% in 2012, but the actual expansion of the economy is likely to be lower. Three months ago, we thought that true real GDP growth would be in line with the official reading, and we saw upside risk to our growth projection. We now think that true real GDP growth in 2012 will be 3%, or at most 4%. We are more pessimistic about the growth outlook not only because of the growing interventionism but also because this years cereal and grains harvest will be smaller than expected (because of the late 2011/early 2012 drought) and economic activity in Brazil (Argentinas main trading partner) will be weaker. However, we do not expect true GDP growth below 3% because fiscal and, particularly, monetary policy remains expansionary and could be loosened further if needed to stimulate economic activity. In our base case scenario for GDP growth in 2012 as reported in the national accounts, we see consumer spending rising 6% and gross fixed investment expanding 8% (down from 11% and 17%, respectively, in 2011). The issues with the Argentine macro data will likely remain unresolved for the foreseeable future. We do not expect the government to deal, in a meaningful way, with the underreporting of inflation because of the high political, financial and legal costs that might arise from formally acknowledging that inflation is much higher than is officially reported. Similarly, we do not think the government will acknowledge a significant slowdown of GDP growth in 2012, even if that could save it from making the payment on the GDP warrant in 2013. In a context where other economies in the region are growing at a relatively decent pace, despite the slowdown in the developed economies, we do not think the Kirchner government would be willing to pay the political price of admitting that, on her watch, Argentina underperformed the region, while the financial benefit of this admission would not materialize until December 2013.
22
14 March 2012
We still think the government wants to see a moderation of consumer and wage inflation in the months ahead. Last year, we thought that the government would resort to tighter fiscal and monetary policy to drive CPI inflation (as measured by the private sector) down to 15%-20% from the current level of about 20%-25%. However, monetary policy is now as loose as it was in mid-2011, as nominal interest rates have fallen again while inflation has remained stable. Given the proposed changes to the central banks charter, which should receive full congressional approval by early April, monetary policy may play an ever larger role in the economy and, thus, we do not envision tighter monetary conditions in the foreseeable future. Tighter fiscal policy and the governments efforts to cap wage increases at about 20% in the upcoming wage negotiations, along with the expected slowdown in domestic demand, may help prevent inflation from rising further but, at this point, we no longer expect it to decline. We still expect the federal government to post a primary fiscal surplus of about 2% of GDP in 2012, consistent with a nearly balanced budget. In 2011, the federal government posted a 1.7% of GDP overall fiscal deficit as the electoral process pressured primary spending. We think that the government wants to maintain the socalled pillars of its model large fiscal and trade surpluses, the accumulation of international reserves and a relatively weak real exchange rate and, thus, it is committed to posting a primary surplus in line with the 2.5% of GDP assumption of the 2012 budget bill. The bulk of the fiscal adjustment in 2012 should come from a reduction of the subsidy bill, which exceeded 5% of GDP last year. The restrictions on imports will probably be only partially effective in preventing a sharp deterioration of the trade surplus. We project that the merchandise trade surplus, on an FOB/FOB basis, will fall to $10bn in 2012 from about $13.7bn in 2011 (on an FOB/CIF basis, this would be equivalent to $6bn in 2012, down from $10bn in 2011). Our projection assumes that agricultural commodity prices remain flat in 2012 while volumes fall 5%. We think that industrial exports will continue to grow, albeit at a more modest pace, and expect that the dollar value of exports in 2012 will be flat relative to 2011. Due to the restrictions in place and the expected slowdown in domestic activity, import growth should slow to about 6% in dollar terms in 2012, down from 31% in 2011. We project a worsening of the current account to a deficit of 0.2% of GDP in 2012 from an estimated 0.4% of GDP surplus in 2011. In the coming months, the government may seek to normalize relations with official and some private creditors. We still think that the government will seek a resolution of the countrys debt arrears with the Paris Club. We expect that the government and its bilateral creditors will manage to narrow the gap between the rescheduling terms proposed by Argentina and the Paris Club (the debt in arrears amounts to about $9bn) and think there is a good chance that an accord will be announced later this year, which may unlock bilateral financing. We also think the government may try to settle the awards granted by the ICSID, as the non-payment of these claims could result in the US suspending trade benefits for Argentina under the Generalized System of Preferences program. We do not expect the government to tap the external bond markets in 2012 or to negotiate with holdout bondholders. The government will likely maintain its FX policy of allowing only a gradual nominal depreciation. We believe it will continue to use the nominal exchange rate as a nominal anchor of inflation, even if it is not an very effective one. We think the government believes that a sharp depreciation of the peso in nominal terms would translate into higher inflation, a drop in domestic sentiment and capital flight. As long as the Brazilian Real does not weaken sharply, the government is probably not too concerned about the erosion of competitiveness and growth. We expect the nominal exchange rate to end 2012 at 4.55 pesos per dollar. With the central banks FX reserves being used to service a large share of the debt, and as there may no longer be the abundance of dollars in the economy that was generated by the large current account surpluses of previous years, we expect the central banks gross stock of FX reserves to remain stable over the next two years, relative to its end-2011 level of $46.5bn.
Emerging Markets Quarterly
23
14 March 2012
The 2011/2012 harvest will likely be about 5% smaller than the previous years and, thus, the agricultural sector will no longer be one of the drivers of growth. In our view, whether industrial production stabilizes at current levels or declines hinges not only on the outlook for global growth and domestic demand, but also on whether the government eases some of the restrictions that are creating distortions in the economy.
110 90 70 50 30 10
170
99/00
07/08
08/09
00/01
01/02
02/03
03/04
04/05
05/06
-10
06/07
09/10
Consumer confidence remains relatively high, which bodes well for the near-term outlook for consumer spending. Real interest rates are again very negative, which keeps consumer loans growing at a fast pace. Meanwhile, despite the governments efforts to encourage bank lending for productive activities, the growth of commercial loans has collapsed in recent weeks.
60
65 55 45
50
40
35 25
30
15 5
12 9 6 3 0 -3 03 04 05
3.5 2.5 1.5 0.5 -0.5 -1.5 Primary fiscal balance Overall fiscal balance
06
07
08
09
10 11F 12F
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12F
24
14 March 2012
We no longer expect inflation, as measured by private sources, to decline from its current 20%-25% range in the foreseeable future. We expect the government to continue with its policy of allowing only a gradual depreciation of the peso in nominal terms. For the past several weeks, the central bank has again been a net buyer of dollars in the FX market.
Exhibit 84: Nominal exchange rate and central bank intervention in the FX market
2 4.5 4.3 4.1 0 3.9 3.7 3.5 Central bank's monthly net FX 3.3 purchases ($bn, left axis)* Nominal exchange rate (ARS per USD, right axis) 3.1 2.9
30
1
25 20
-1
15 10 5 0 Feb-07 May-08 Aug-09 Nov-10 Feb-12 Privately estimated CPI inflation Consumers' expectations for 12 month inflation Wage inflation*
-2 -3 -4
*Average of private and public sector wages. Source: Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Credit Suisse
Export and import growth are likely to fall significantly in 2012. The former on the back of a smaller harvest, stable prices for cereals and grains, and a less competitive exchange rate, and the latter due to the broad import restrictions that the government has put in place.
220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 Oct-01 May-04 Dec-06 Jul-09 Feb-12 REER using privately estimated inflation data REER using the official inflation data
40
20
-20
-40
55 50 45 40
Capital flight slowed in Q4 2011 and, based on preliminary data, it has declined further in the year to date. However, domestic sentiment regarding the peso remains fragile.
4 0 -4 -8 -12 -16 Current account Net FDI IFI loans ex. IMF Financial sector and other Public sector ex. IFI loans Non-financial private sector 2Q07 3Q07 4Q07 1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09 3Q09 4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11
Gross
35 30 25
Net of borrow ing from bilateral lenders, net of reserve req. on USD deposits
25
14 March 2012
(1) Starting in 2003, people participating in the Jefes de Hogar subsidy program are counted as employed; adjusting the data by Jefes de Hogar, the unemployment rate is 2-4 points higher. (2) Increase indicates appreciation. REER was estimated using the official inflation series. (3) Weighted average of wages in the formal and informal private sector, and the public sector. (4) Debt data assumes that Paris Club debt is rescheduled in 2012. (5) Net of Brady guarantees (through 2003), the Bogar bond, government bonds held by Central Bank and by the social security agency (ANSES), and estimated government cash holdings. (6) For the 2002-2005 period, it includes notional interest paid on defaulted debt. (7) It includes only scheduled amortizations to multilaterals. (8) Net of borrowing from the BIS and other bilateral lenders. Source: INDEC, Central Bank, Ministry of Economy, Credit Suisse
26
14 March 2012
We expect real GDP growth of 2.5% in 2012 and 4.0% in 2013. Our forecasts are lower than the median market expectations of 3.3% for 2012 and 4.2% for 2013. Our projection for 2012 assumes acceleration in economic activity from 0.3% qoq in Q4 2011 to 0.8% qoq in Q1 2012 and 1.0% qoq in H2 2012. If our GDP growth forecast for 1Q 2012 (which already assumes a significant downward bias) is correct, the market consensus forecast for growth in 2012 will be compatible with an average expansion of 1.6% from Q2 2012 to Q4 2012. Such continuous growth was recorded in Brazil only from Q3 2006 to Q3 2008, in a scenario of very strong global growth and a significant expansion in investments and industrial production. Low industrial performance and investment expansion explains why growth will resume gradually in 2012. We believe 2012 GDP growth will be lower than the 4.5% average growth from 2004 to 2010. On the supply side, we expect industrial GDP to expand 1.9% in 2012 versus the 3.8% average from 2004 to 2010. We are assuming that industrial expansion will not be strong in 2012. We expect much of the growth in domestic demand to be met by imports expansion. While 55% of the rise in the consumption of goods from 2003 to 2011 was met by local industry, imports accounted for the total rise in consumption in 2011. Local inflation well above of that of Brazils trading partners and the significant rise in the cost of labor in manufacturing explain the declining competitiveness of local industry. We expect investments to grow 5.3% in 2012, higher than the 4.7% of 2011 but much less than the 9.2% average expansion from 2004 to 2010. Investments in machinery and equipment, which were responsible for an important part of the strong investment growth in the past several years, should contribute much less to investment expansion in upcoming quarters. We keep our expectation of a low unemployment rate in 2012 and 2013. Our projection of GDP growth of 2.5% in 2012 and 4.0% in 2013 is compatible with the decline in the unemployment rate measured by the Monthly Employment Survey (PME), from 6.0% on average for 2011 to 5.8% in 2012 and 5.2% in 2013. We estimate that the GDP growth rate needed to keep unemployment stable has dropped from 3.3% in 2003 to 2.0% in 2011. We project that growth in real wages will increase from 2.7% in 2011 to 3.2% in 2012 due to the continuation of low unemployment and the real increase in the minimum wage of 8.8% in 2012. Most of the decline in annual IPCA inflation (benchmark used for inflation targeting) at the beginning of the year resulted from lower food prices. We expect IPCA inflation to decline from 6.5% yoy in December 2011 to 5.3% in April. A high comparison base (inflation of 0.80% on average from January to April 2011), lower commodity price inflation, and a few non-recurring factors (e.g., municipal elections and the change in the weighting structure of the IPCA index) have led to lower CPI inflation. We expect IPCA inflation to decline to 5.0% by the end of 2012 as a result of the favorable prospects for non-services inflation (composed of inflation in food at home, industrial goods, and administered prices) and a decline in services inflation (due to lower inflation in prices linked to past inflation). The main risks to our forecast come from the dynamics of commodity prices (and their direct impact on food prices) and from services inflation, which is quite persistent and reached almost 10% yoy in 2011. Despite the favorable outlook for consumer inflation in the short term, median market expectations for IPCA inflation in the next few years increased sharply in Q1 2012. Most market participants believe IPCA inflation will not converge to the center of the target range in the coming years. Median market expectations for IPCA inflation in 2013 increased from 5.0% in December 2011 to 5.5% in March, while the market forecast for 2014 and 2015 rose from 4.6% to 5.00% and from 4.5% to 4.8%, respectively. This jump in inflation forecasts (e.g., breakeven inflation and Market Readout) makes it more difficult for IPCA inflation to converge to the center of the target range in the next few quarters.
27
14 March 2012
We expect the current easing cycle to total 400bps, with the Selic interest rate (policy rate) reaching 8.50% at the end of May. The Monetary Policy Committee (Copom) decided to cut the Selic basic interest rate by 75bps on 7 March, from 10.50% to 9.75%, accelerating the pace of cuts in the current easing cycle from 50bps to 75bps. Some market participants explain the acceleration as a way of containing local currency appreciation by reducing the appeal of the local fixed-income market. However, we think the decision to speed up the easing cycle was probably due to lower-than-expected consumer inflation in January and February and, mainly, to the subdued growth in Q4 2011 and early 2012 (e.g., Januarys industrial production). These results were much lower than expected by the government and most investors a few months ago. We are now assuming additional cuts of 75bps on 7 April and 50bps on 30 May, with the Selic reaching 8.50% and remaining at this level until the end of 2013. Given that we think growth will surprise the government on the downside, we believe the probability of a stronger easing cycle than we expect is not low. Brazils external accounts remain sound, despite uncertainty surrounding the global outlook. We expect the current account deficit to edge up from 2.1% of GDP in 2011 to 2.2% of GDP in 2012, largely due to our expectation of a lower trade balance in 2012. The risk of Brazil having problems financing its current account deficit in the medium term seems low in view of the countrys high international reserves, the gradual improvement in solvency indicators, and the favorable prospects for financial inflows. FDI inflows equivalent to 2.2% of GDP should be enough to finance the current account deficit in 2012. Our forecasts for the countrys external accounts point to a decline in the balance-of-payments surplus from $59 billion in 2011 to $21 billion in 2012. The government has announced new measures aimed at preventing local currency appreciation. High international liquidity and favorable funding conditions abroad (low interest rates) at the start of 2012 have led to a sharp increase in the volume of private bonds issued and direct loans taken out abroad by Brazilian banks and corporations. This led to substantial BRL appreciation at the beginning of the year. In response, in March the government adopted a set of measures aimed at limiting capital inflows into the country. We believe the announcement of additional measures will be dependent upon the amount of capital inflows into the country as well as the trend followed by the exchange rate in 2012, whose dynamics will depend greatly on the global outlook. We assume that the Real will remain volatile in the coming months and that it will plateau at around R$1.75/US$ in December 2012. Cuts in budget spending and higher-than-expected fiscal results in January reinforce our forecast that the primary surplus target will be met in 2012. The central government received almost no extraordinary revenues, and the fiscal result was marked by a combination of favorable tax receipts, lower transfers to local entities, and a sharp decline in discretionary expenditures. This result and the federal governments announcement of R$55 billion in spending cuts in the 2012 budget reinforced our view, published in December 2011, that the public sector should be able to meet the full primary surplus target in 2012 (R$139.8 billion, equivalent to 3.1% of GDP) without the use of escape clauses for investments made under the Growth Acceleration Program (PAC). We expect net debt to continue to decline in 2012 from 36.5% of GDP in December 2011 to 34.5% in December 2012. We keep the view that the risks on the fiscal side are minor in the short term.
28
14 March 2012
We expect GDP growth in 2012 to be slightly lower than in 2011, mainly due to the unfavorable statistical effect. In our opinion, the lower growth in comparison to the average of 4.5% from 2004 to 2010 will be explained by industry on the supply side and investments on the demand side.
5.2 GDP growth 2008 Supply Agriculture Industry Services Household consumption Demand Government consumption Investments Exports Imports
Source: IBGE, Credit Suisse
7.5 2009 -0.3 -3.1 -5.6 2.1 4.4 3.1 -6.7 -9.1 -7.6 2010 6.3 10.4 5.5 6.9 4.2 21.3 11.5 35.8 2.7 2011 3.9 1.6 2.7 4.1 1.9 4.7 4.5 9.7 2.5 2012e 2.2 1.9 2.6 3.5 2.0 5.3 2.0 7.5
4.0 2013e 2.8 3.7 3.8 4.6 3.2 8.9 5.5 12.8
Our scenario assumes an increase in quarteron-quarter GDP growth, from 0.8% in 1Q12 to nearly 1.0% in 2H12. Assuming our projection for 1Q12, the markets GDP growth forecast of 3.3% in 2012 would require average GDP growth of 1.5% from 2Q12 to 4Q12. Such continuous growth was recorded only from Q3 2006 to Q3 2008, in a scenario of very strong global growth.
YoY QoQ YoY QoQ YoY QoQ YoY QoQ 0.8 0.8
1.6 1.8 1.1 2.9 1.0 3.9 1.1 2.5 1.1 1.1
2.8 3.8
6,3 8.3
4.5
3.3
3.3
5.4
We expect the Copom to make 125bps in additional cuts in the Selic interest rate, with cuts of 75bps and 50bps at the next two meetings. Although our forecast is in line with the yield curve in the short term, we expect the Selic to remain stable in 2013. The yield curve is pricing in total tightening of 250bps in 2013, with the policy rate reaching 11.00% at the end of the year.
10 5
Apr-13
Oct-13
29
14 March 2012
Consumer inflation has declined in the past few months due to the more favorable dynamics in the non-services group (food at home, industrial goods, and administered prices). However, market participants have increased their forecasts for IPCA inflation in the medium and long term. Median market expectations for consumer inflation in 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016 are above 4.5%.
5.6 5.6 5.4 5.2 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.2 4.0 1-Dec-11 2016 2012 5.5 5.3 2013 2014 5.0 4.8 2015 4.6
Feb-11
Feb-12
25-Dec-11
18-Jan-12 11-Feb-12
6-Mar-12
Slower growth in global commodity prices and reduced global growth will probably cause a reduction in Brazils trade surplus. Even with lower deficits in the main services and income accounts, Brazils current account deficit would rise in 2012 due to a drop in the trade surplus. Nevertheless, we expect net financial inflows to outweigh the current account deficit and keep international reserves growing.
6.4
111 97 30 71 10 41 10 14 25 -8 37 99 11 13 38 76 36 -12 37 -1 29 6 76 14 5 58
2.9 4.5
4.8 2.3
4.5 2.4
14
3.2 0.6 -2.2
28 7 13 -22 23 7 8 -9
26 28
0.1 -0.2
-0.4 -0.2 0.0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012e Current account Capital and financial account Errors and omissions Balance of payments result
Source: Central Bank of Brazil, Credit Suisse
-1.5 0.0
-2.3
-2.1
-2 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012e Direct investments Portfolio investments - Fixed income Portfolio investments - Equities Other
Source: Central Bank of Brazil, Credit Suisse
We maintain our expectation that the federal government will meet the primary surplus target of R$139.8 billion (or 3.1% of GDP) in 2012. In our opinion, cuts in budget spending and a higher-than-expected fiscal result in January reinforce our forecast that the fiscal target will be met in 2012.
29.5
938
55.0
-3.6
-3.6
-2.8
-3.3
-2.5
-2.6
-2.3
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012e 2013e Central government Government-owned corporations States and municipalities Nominal deficit
Source: Central Bank of Brazil, Credit Suisse
Primary surplus
30
14 March 2012
(1) Real effective exchange rate. Deflator: CPIs. Increase indicates appreciation; (2) Average annual growth of nominal wage; (3) Total government expenditure. Include interest payment; (4) Net of fiduciary fund assets, central bank holdings of government paper, social security system holdings of government paper; (5) Scheduled amortizations for public and private sectors; (6) Adjusted net reserves due to parity with other assets and it also excludes teh IMF loan (liquidated in Dec.2005). Source: IBGE, IPEA, Central Bank, Trade Ministry and Credit Suisse
31
14 March 2012
In Chile, signs of a clear economic slowdown are still hard to find almost three months into 2012. This, combined with much higher than expected inflation in two of the past three months has made us (and the market) revise sharply our expectations for the likely path of the monetary policy rate in upcoming quarters. In short, we think that the central bank will likely keep the monetary policy rate unchanged at 5.0% for the remainder of 2012. Up until last week, we were anticipating three more rate cuts of 25bps each. We think that investor focus should shift to inflation, where we see risks of further disappointments, as current market expectations appear too optimistic. We are maintaining our real GDP growth forecast for 2012 at 4.0%, compared to the estimated 6.4% growth rate in 2011. Though this forecast may appear low given the resilience of the economy in recent quarters, we prefer to wait for the next release on 19 March of the revised national accounts with 2008 as the base year (2003 at present) to fine-tune our forecasts. Our current forecast compares to a median forecast of 4.4% real GDP growth in 2012 in the latest central bank survey released earlier this week. As has been the case in recent quarters, booming imports will likely continue to mask the strength in domestic demand in the GDP figures. For instance, we are forecasting that domestic demand growth will average 6.2% in real terms in 2012, fueled by 10% growth in gross fixed investment and with private consumption expanding by 5.5%. Some of the factors supporting this rosy outlook include the ample credit availability in the economy and the rising consumer confidence levels which, in turn, probably reflect the strength in the labor market. Persistently high economic growth and a tight labor market have taken a toll on inflation, despite the strength of the peso. We recently increased our year-end 2012 inflation forecast from 3.0% to 4.1%, as we now project that annual inflation will average 4.4% in 2012, the highest annual average since 2008. Our forecasts are more pessimistic than those captured in the latest central bank survey which show a median inflation forecast of 3.5% for year-end 2012. Therefore, we see risks of further adverse inflation surprises and of a worsening in inflation expectations. We are concerned about the speed with which our measure of core inflation has risen in recent months. In year-on-year terms, headline inflation minus food, beverages, tobacco and energy has risen from 0.1% last July to 2.5% in February 2012. This measure, which closed last year at 2.0%, suggests that the recent adverse inflation surprises (December 2011 and February 2012) were driven by more than just a few bad inflation prints for certain items, probably reflecting various bottlenecks in the economy. Barring a major economic slowdown in upcoming months, we do not see room for cuts in the monetary policy rate in the foreseeable future. We forecast that the central bank will leave the monetary policy rate unchanged at 5.0% in the balance of 2012. The risk at present is that the central bank may choose to start contemplating rate hikes, which are yet to be priced-in by the market. Ex-post, the prudence we called for in our previous Quarterly report regarding the timing of any rate cuts proved timely, while our criticism of the January 2012 surprise rate cut also seems to have been appropriate. Finally, we continue to think that Chile stands out globally with its ability to implement aggressive countercyclical monetary and fiscal policies if needed. On the monetary policy front, the central bank continues to enjoy strong credibility with regards to its commitment to the 3.0% inflation target, despite its premature rate cut in January 2012. On the fiscal front, the government has abundant external savings that are equivalent to 12% of this years GDP and has a net creditor position.
32
14 March 2012
145
There are still no clear signs of an economic slowdown, at a time in which various measures of consumer confidence are well-off their recent lows and are approaching multi-year highs.
140 135 130 125 120 115 Jan-10 Earthquake and tsunami
30 20 Feb-03
Jul-10
Jan-11
Jul-11
Jan-12
Feb-06
Feb-09
Feb-12
76,000
170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 Dec-07 Total Durables Non durables
72,000
68,000
10,000 9,500
Dec-09
Dec-10
Dec-08
Dec-09
Dec-10
Dec-11
14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 4Q03 Nominal w age increases National unemployment Unemployment rate in Santiago Feb-10 Feb-11 Feb-12 4Q05 4Q07 4Q09 4Q11
33
14 March 2012
Exhibit 105: Annual consumer price inflation and the monetary policy rate
The rise in core inflation has been surprisingly fast in recent months. At the noncore level, higher food inflation has more than offset the drop in annual inflation on alcoholic beverages, tobacco and energy. Rising gasoline prices abroad are a renewed risk to non-core inflation.
%
20 15 10
5
0 Monetary policy rate Headline inflation Our core inflation measure* Aug-10 Feb-11 Aug-11 Feb-12
0 -5 Feb-10
-2 Feb-10
Aug-10
Feb-11
Aug-11
Feb-12
* Excludes food, alcoholic beverages, tobacco and energy Source: INE, Central bank, Credit Suisse
The swaps curve is no longer pricing in rate cuts, after inflation was much higher than expected in two of the past three months. The real exchange rate appears to be fairly valued, relative to its own history, but it is cheap relative to our fair value estimate.
10
4Q03
4Q05
4Q07
4Q09
4Q11
FX reserves Economic stabilization fund (FEES) Financial assets (FA) Pension fund reserve
15.6%
5.9%
4.5%
1.7%
4Q07
1Q09
2Q10
3Q11
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
34
14 March 2012
(1) Adjusted for seasonality (2) Real effective exchange rate, increase indicates appreciation (3) General compensation index (includes fringe benefits). (4) Excludes debt of the central bank (5) Net of dollar assets deposited in the central bank and abroad through various funds and of debt owed by public sector companies to the government (6) Scheduled amortizations for public and private sectors. Source: Central Bank, INE, Budget office, Ministry of Finance, Credit Suisse
35
14 March 2012
We expect real GDP growth to slow down gradually in 2012, to 5.2% from an estimated 5.9% in 2011. The slowdown in global growth does not seem to have affected the Colombian economy significantly; domestic demand is decelerating gradually while exports are performing better than expected. Both consumer and business remained quite strong through early 2012, while credit growth remained high, which suggests that private spending will continue to drive GDP growth this year. Real GDP rose a strong 7.7% in Q3 2011 (1.7% qoq sa non-annualized); we estimate that real GDP grew 6.1% yoy in Q4 2011 and project a 5.5% yoy expansion for Q1 2012 (1.5% and 1.2% qoq, respectively). The tightening of monetary policy is supportive of our view that headline CPI inflation will decline to 3% by the end of 2012. Headline CPI inflation fell to 3.55% in February from a recent peak of 4.0% (in October 2011). Despite our relatively bullish view about the economy and the expected increase in domestic fuel prices going forward (as the government seeks to reduce the fuel subsidy bill), we expect inflation to decline further. Food disinflation should be the main factor driving down headline inflation, as the impact of the La Nia weather phenomenon on local food production appears mild. Meanwhile, the strength of the Colombian peso should contain, if not revert, last years increase in tradables inflation. Last, but not least, the central banks efforts to revert the deterioration of inflation expectations and reign in credit growth should prevent inflationary pressures from rising. Unless there is evidence of activity and credit growth slowing meaningfully, we expect one more 25bps rate hike, likely in Q2, taking the nominal policy interest rate to 5.5%. We project that the current account deficit will widen to $9.4bn (2.4% of GDP) in 2012 from an estimated $8.6bn in 2011. The dollar value of imports rose sharply in 2011, up 35%, in tandem with domestic demand growth. However, export revenues grew at an even faster pace, up 43% in dollar terms, largely on the back of higher oil prices and volumes sold; as a result, the merchandise trade surplus (on an FOB/FOB basis) rose to $6bn in 2011 from $2.2bn in 2010. We think that exports will grow just 10% in dollar terms in 2012, but we do not expect a significant worsening of the external accounts, as import growth is likely to moderate as well. We project a merchandise trade surplus of $5.3bn in 2012. Net dollar inflows in 2012 are likely to remain high, which should make it difficult for the government and the central bank to fight the appreciation of the Colombian peso. The main sources of the dollar inflows are FDI (with the bulk of it going to the hydrocarbons sector) and the repatriation of profits by the state-owned oil company, Ecopetrol (to fund its investment program). The central bank resumed its program of daily dollar purchases in February, $20mn per day, and, for now, we think it is not inclined to step up its intervention in the FX market. However, as has been the case in the past, the USDCOP approaching the 1,700 level is likely to prompt additional measures, which may include larger daily dollar purchases (by the central bank and the government) and, possibly, the implementation of capital controls. Our end-2012 USDCOP forecast is 1,740. Last year, the central government vastly outperformed its 3.7% of GDP deficit target on the back of higher than expected tax revenues. The tax intake in 2011 was nearly one percentage point of GDP higher than projected due to the strength of the economy and government efforts to reign in tax evasion; as a result, the preliminary estimate for the central governments deficit in 2011 is 2.9% of GDP. Currently, we expect the central government to post a deficit of about 3% of GDP in 2012, although if it manages to succeed further in its fight against tax evasion, it may be able to post a lower deficit. On the reform front, we expect the government to focus its efforts on obtaining congressional approval for a structural reform of the tax code to make it more simple and more efficient. This tax reform is expected to be revenue neutral.
36
14 March 2012
12
We recently raised our 2012 real GDP growth projection, to 5.2%, from 4% previously, as domestic demand appears to be decelerating more gradually than we had anticipated
2 1
0 -1 -2 2Q08 4Q08 2Q09 4Q09 2Q10 4Q10 2Q11 4Q11 2Q12 4Q12
-4 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11F 12F
Source: DANE, Credit Suisse
25
35 25
20 15 10 5
US 27%
% change year-on-year in dollar terms, three-month moving average. Source: DANE, Credit Suisse
37
14 March 2012
The local supply shocks that led to the increase in food prices last year are reversing. Food inflation, which reached 6.6% yoy in October 2011, fell to 4.7% in February and should continue declining in the coming months. The strength of the Colombian peso should contain, if not revert, last years increase in tradables inflation.
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1
Oct-10
Feb-12
Feb-09
Nov-09
Aug-10
May-11
Feb-12
* It excludes goods and services that have the most volatile prices ** It excludes food and regulated goods and services Source: DANE, Credit Suisse
The central bank is in the process of taking the reference interest rate to a more neutral level (about 2%-2.5% in real terms); we expect one more hike in Q2, taking the nominal policy interest rate to 5.5%. The tightening of monetary policy is also aimed at curbing credit growth, particularly, consumer credit as the central bank is concerned about households becoming over leveraged.
50
10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 Feb-04 Nominal interest rate Real interest rate (non-food inflation) Real interest rate (headline inflation) Feb-06 Feb-08 Feb-10 Feb-12
0 -10 Feb-04 Feb-06 Feb-08 40 30 20 10
Feb-10
Feb-12
1 0 -1 -2
38
14 March 2012
(1) Increase indicates appreciation. (2) Wages for manufacturing workers. (3) Non-financial public sector debt net of intergovernmental loans and holdings of public sector bonds by public sector entities. (4) Flows are reported on a cash-basis. Net FDI accounted for on an accrued basis, which takes into account actual flows, may be significantly different; for example, in 2010, net FDI on an accrued basis was $9.1bn. (5) Scheduled amortizations for public sector. Source: DANE, Central Bank, Ministry of Finance and Public Credit, Credit Suisse
39
14 March 2012
Economic activity in Mexico appears to be off to a strong start in 2012, judging from the latest manufacturing output report. This seems consistent with recent upside surprises out of the US. Still, we are maintaining our real GDP growth forecast for 2012 unchanged at 3.2%, as speed-up scares in the US are not uncommon and since the strength in Mexicos manufacturing sector is overly dependent on external demand for vehicles, which we project will weaken as the year goes on. Our real GDP growth forecast assumes that industrial output in the US will grow at an average annual rate of 3.8% (4.2% in 2011) and that US real GDP will grow 2.3% on average (1.7% in 2011). On the political front, presidential campaigns will be under way at the end of March. We think that Mexican assets, particularly the peso, have room to rally in upcoming weeks if the PRIs presidential candidate (Enrique Pea Nieto) maintains a strong lead in the polls, and if the candidate from the PRD-led coalition (Andrs M. Lpez Obrador) remains a distant third in the race. Our central scenario continues to be that Pea Nieto will win the presidential elections by a comfortable margin and that the PRI-PVEM coalition will become the largest bloc in the lower house and the senate. These results, in our view, would be conducive to reform progress as early as 2013. Sentiment indicators in the manufacturing sector have been a very poor predictor of output in recent months. On one hand, contemporaneous PMI and confidence indicators have moved in opposite directions in nine of the past twelve months. On the other hand, both variables are well below their mid-2011 peak levels, even though manufacturing output has marched higher, almost uninterrupted, during this period. The main explanation we find is that all but two of Mexicos manufacturing industries seem to be struggling, while the other twovehicles and machinery/equipmentare booming. Specifically, government data show that in 2011, production of machinery and equipment grew 11.4%, while production of transportation equipment grew 17.1%. In contrast, output in all the other 19 industries grew by just 2.5%. In January 2012, a similar picture unfolded. Vehicle output was up 2.3% in monthly terms (non-annualized) and output of machinery and equipment was up 2.6%. In contrast, output in all other manufacturing industries was up 0.5%. Strength in selected manufacturing sectors and the steady recovery in other variables, like remittances, credit and confidence, should continue to support domestic demand. We are forecasting that private consumption will grow at an average rate of 4.0% in real terms in 2012, down slightly from the estimated growth rate of 4.4% in 2011. Similarly, we project a slight slowdown in gross fixed investment growth from 8.0% in 2011 to 6.0%, on the back of slightly tighter credit conditions. We remain comfortable with the inflation outlook as the labor market remains loose, the peso has rallied and demand-side inflationary pressures are nonexistent. We continue to project that annual headline inflation will hover around 4.0% most of the year, while annual core inflation will remain between 3.1% and 3.4% in 2012. Our projections are in line with the central banks forecast, as depicted in the center of its inflation fan charts in the latest quarterly inflation report. The main risk to higher inflation resides in agricultural prices, in our view, despite the recent favorable surprises on this front. While we think that the adverse impact on several prices from last years drought are behind us, we also acknowledge that some key prices are quite low at present, including those of red tomatoes, onions and lemons. Meanwhile, we do not think that energy prices represent a risk to inflation, despite the rise in international oil and gasoline prices, as we think it is unlikely that the government will accelerate sharply the pace at which it increases gasoline prices on a monthly basis (particularly before the July presidential and congressional elections).
40
14 March 2012
We are sticking to our out-of-consensus call that the central bank will cut the overnight rate at some point in 2012. We base this view on how we think the central banks monetary conditions index will likely continue to tighten if we are right on our call that the Mexican peso will rally ahead of the July elections. Additional arguments supporting our call include the dissipation of the risk of an extreme event in Europe and our belief that, when the time comes, the majority of the central banks board members will prefer to start a monetary policy tightening cycle from a level below the current 4.5% for the overnight rate. In our view, the window for the central bank to start cutting the overnight rate is mainly in the first half of the year. We remain bullish on the Mexican peso, despite the already sharp appreciation year-to-date. Our year-end 2012 forecast for the exchange rate is 12.30 pesos per dollar; for year-end 2013 our forecast is 12.00 pesos per dollar. Some of the factors supporting the currency are the risk-on mood in international markets, the rise in oil prices (and its positive impact on Mexicos fiscal and external accounts), the currencys own valuation and the prospects for sovereign debt ratings upgrades over the next 12 months, particularly from S&P and Fitch. In our view, the Mexican authorities could begin to fight the appreciation of the peso in upcoming months. We think that the instruments they would likely use would be interest rate cuts (in the case of the central bank), and/or the re-introduction of the monthly auction of US dollar puts by the foreign exchange commission, that would allow the central bank to accumulate dollars from the market at times of peso strength. Through this option mechanism, the central bank accumulated $9.1bn between March 2010 and November 2011. The bank discontinued these monthly auctions at the end of November 2011, a time of significant peso weakness. We continue to project that fiscal and external imbalances will remain modest in 2012. On the fiscal front, we project a fiscal deficit equivalent to 2.5% of GDP, including Pemexs capital expenditures that are equivalent to 2.0% of GDP. As in previous years, we think that the public sector would likely spend most of the oil-related revenue windfall that may materialize should oil process remain above the governments budget estimate. Between 2003 and 2011, the revenue surprise was equivalent to $155bn; unfortunately, however, less than the equivalent of $2.0bn is currently saved in the various stabilization funds. On the current account, our forecast is of a modest deficit of $11.9bn or 1.0% of GDP. Our deficit forecast matches our estimate of net FDI inflows this year. Presidential and congressional elections will take place on July 1, 2012. Campaigns will begin on March 30 and will end on June 27. The Federal Electoral Institute will organize at least two debates among the four presidential candidates. The first debate will take place in the first week of May, while the second one will take place no later than the second week of June. The format and dates of the debates will be determined once campaigns are under way. Polls suggest that the candidate of the PRI-PVEM alliance, Enrique Pea Nieto continues to enjoy a wide lead over the PANs candidate (Josefina Vzquez Mota) and the candidate from the PRD-led coalition (Andrs M. Lpez Obrador). A sample of five polls taken in February and March show Pea Nieto with an average lead of 15.4 points over Vzquez Mota, and a lead of 25.9 points over Lpez Obrador. Average effective voter preferences in this sample are 47%-31%-22% for Pea NietoVzquez Mota- Lpez Obrador. In the congressional race, though poll availability is lower, pollster Consulta Mitofsky reports that the PRI-PVEM currently has 44% of effective voter preferences in the lower house race (the PAN is at 31% and the left-ofcenter parties are at 24%). This type of outcome could translate into the PRI-PVEM winning more than 50% of the seats in the lower house. In our view, an undisputed victory by the PRI-PVEM coalition in the presidential and congressional elections would fuel investor expectations that pending structural reforms could be achieved starting in 2013.
Emerging Markets Quarterly
41
14 March 2012
60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 Feb-09 Producer confidence (lhs) PMI (lhs) Manufacturing output (rhs) Feb-10 Feb-11
4Q10
4Q11
4Q12
Higher consumer confidence levels and greater credit availability have supported the expansion in consumption and investment since mid2009. Conditions in the labor market have also improved, but at a slower pace.
95 90
Feb-09
Feb-10
Feb-11
Aug-08
Aug-09
Aug-10
Aug-11
Feb-12
Jan-09
Jan-10
Jan-11
Jan-12
Agricultural prices account for most of the gap between headline and core inflation. Core inflation excluding all foodstuffs, beverages, tobacco and energy is at just 2.3%. High crude oil export prices are a positive for the external and fiscal accounts, and not a danger to inflation, based on how gasoline prices are determined by the government.
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Dec-08 Headline Core (Govt. definition) Core (US definition*) Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11 Dec-12
Actual
Budget
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
* Headline minus all foodstuffs, beverages, tobacco and energy Source: INEGI, Credit Suisse
2012
42
14 March 2012
Dec-91
Dec-94
Dec-97
Dec-00
Dec-03
Dec-06
Dec-09
The central banks monetary conditions index has been tightening since the start of 2012 on the back of the rally in the peso. A continuation of this trend could lead the central bank to ease monetary policy.
-5
-10
-15
The central banks survey of private expectations shows an average forecast of rate hikes starting in early 2013. The swaps curve is also pricing in some rate hikes within the next year. We are not on this camp, as we see room for rate cuts materializing particularly in the first half of 2012.
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 End 2010 End 2011 3/12/12 0
Source: Credit Suisse
4.50
4.30
4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
15 20
60 50 40 30 20 10
40 47 31 21 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Nov-11 Dec-11 Oct-11 Jan-12 Mar-12 Feb-12
PRI-PVEM
OEM
0
Excelsior Mitofsky
Universal
ISA
Pollster
Average
The real exchange rate remains cheap relative to its own historical average.
120 110
43
14 March 2012
(1) Real effective exchange rate, increase indicates appreciation. (2) Contractual wage increases at a national level in the public and private sectors (excludes fringe benefits). (3) Narrow definition that excludes off-balance expenditures. (4) Includes all contingent liabilities associated with IPAB, Pidiregas, FARAC, financial intermediation and other debtor support programs. (5) Scheduled short- and long-term market and non-market amortizations for public and private sectors. (6) Includes the total stock of Pidiregas debt. Source: INEGI, Banco de Mexico, Ministry of Finance, Credit Suisse
44
14 March 2012
We maintain our real GDP growth forecast of 6.0% in 2012, a sizeable deceleration from 10.6% in 2011. This adjustment is milder, though, than the deceleration to 3.2% in 2009 from 10.1% in 2008. Panamas small, open economy will certainly feel the effects of slower growth in Europe and China. However, robust domestic demand, led by continued execution of the $5.25bn Panama Canal expansion project and the governments $13.4bn five-year investment program, as well as historically low unemployment levels, should soften the blow. Meanwhile, we expect the external sectors contribution to growth to remain negative due to the heavy demand for imports required for the public investment projects, which largely focus on infrastructure. Inflation will likely remain high relative to historical standards this year. We project 12-month inflation of 5.2% at year end 2012, down from 6.3% in 2011, but compared to an average of 3.7% over the past 10 years. Panamas inflation is largely driven by international commodity prices, despite temporary fuel subsidies. As an officially dollarized economy, Panama will continue to import loose monetary policy from the US over our forecast horizon. In addition, fiscal policy will likely remain expansive over the course of the governments investment program. Panamas structural current account deficit will probably remain large at almost 13% of GDP this year, but is driven by investment and should be over 50% financed by FDI. Consumer goods imports and restocking of Colon Free Zone inventories for re-export should also keep the current account wide. Foreign direct investment in Panama reached $2.8bn in 2011 despite turmoil in the international markets; we expect at least $2.4bn in FDI in 2012, mainly driven by reinvested earnings of foreign companies operating in Panama. Achieving this years non-financial public sector deficit limit under the fiscal responsibility law of 2.0% of GDP looks more challenging than in the past. Using the budget projections from the governments revised five-year plan and our GDP forecasts, we expect a NFPS deficit of 2.1% of GDP in 2012. However, the government projects real GDP growth of 7.5% this year, which would probably result in a smaller deficit. In either case, the government should easily cover its funding gap with a combination of multilateral and domestic borrowing. We project that NPFS debt will continue declining to 39% of GDP in 2012 from 42% at the end of 2011. Popular support for President Martinelli reached an all time low in February. A Dichter and Neira poll showed that 33% of respondents had a positive view of Martinelli, down from 47% in January and 64% one year earlier. Martinellis popularity has been trending downward since he took office in 2009, but any natural decline has been exacerbated by last years rupture of the government coalition, public confrontations with various sectors and most recently, what was perceived as poor handling of protests by indigenous groups against mining projects and hydroelectric dams in their territory. Unless Martinelli adopts a more conciliatory governing style, we expect his approval ratings to remain low and for policy reversals to continue. In this context, we believe it will probably be difficult for Martinelli to secure any of the unpopular electoral reforms he desires, like adding a second round to presidential elections or amending the constitution to allow consecutive re-election. Hopefully the noisy political backdrop will not derail the governments plan to create a sovereign wealth fund to manage future fiscal transfers from the expanded Panama Canal. The economic authorities aim to present a bill that would establish this fund to the National Assembly in the near term. The authorities estimate that increased capacity and higher tolls will allow the Canals fiscal contributions to rise to $3bn by 2018 and $5bn by 2025. The sovereign fund would likely use these transfers to maintain a balanced budget and pay future obligations, including debt service and pension system transition costs. We expect the bill to be approved as long as President Martinellis party retains an absolute majority in the Assembly, although smooth passage cannot be guaranteed in the current political environment. 45
14 March 2012
20 7.6 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 2007 Net Exports Governmant Spending Investment Private Consumption Real GDP Growth (% change year-on-year) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012F 2013F 12.1 10.1 6.0 3.9 6.5 10.6
Dec-09
Dec-10
Nov-09
Nov-10
Nov-11
Sep-09
Jun-10
Mar-11
Dec-11
Jun-10
Dec-10
Jun-11
Dec-11
46
14 March 2012
Last years non-financial public sector deficit of 2.3% of GDP was safely within the 3.0% limit set by the fiscal responsibility law, but we think the government could risk non-compliance with the 2.0% limit in 2012 unless economic growth exceeds our expectations. Nevertheless, non-financial public sector debt should fall below 39% of GDP by the end of this year.
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
2011
2013F
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013F
Much of Panamas external bond debt is long-dated and the near-term maturity profile is manageable. The government recently conducted a liability management exercise that reduced its Global 2015 external bond maturity by $521mn and furthered its strategy to develop the local capital market and diversify its financing sources.
Other* $1.1
1.4
2036 $1.8
2029 $1.0
2027 $1.0
2015 $1.5
2026 $1.0
*Bonds maturing in 2013, 2021, 2023 and 2034
2020 $1.0
President Martinellis approval rating fell to a new low of 33% in February following what was seen as poor handling of protests by indigenous Panamanians over planned mining concessions and hydroelectric projects in their territory. The ongoing political noise has stalled or reversed progress on Martinellis legislative priorities, though his party retains an absolute majority in the National Assembly.
80
Other, 6
60
40
20
Partido Panameista, 12
Source: National Assembly, Credit Suisse
47
14 March 2012
2006 8.5 4.4 16.6 18.3 17.1 3.3 5,209 9.1 2.2 2.5 1.00 1.00 -0.7 5.0 4.14 0.5 4.9 24.5 61.0 87.2 22.5 86.6 6.3 91.6 16.6 72.8 69.5 17.6 10.9 -0.4 -2.6 2.6 2.1 7.8 45.4 62.4
2007 12.1 0.9 41.0 23.1 19.5 3.3 5,834 7.3 6.4 4.2 1.00 1.00 1.3 7.9 4.18 3.5 7.0 24.7 53.7 90.0 17.3 98.9 29.7 95.1 17.9 73.3 75.2 14.6 22.9 -1.4 -7.2 1.8 0.2 8.3 42.5 57.9
2008 10.1 -2.1 25.3 26.2 23.0 3.4 6,759 6.4 6.8 8.8 1.00 1.00 5.0 7.3 2.88 0.4 3.6 25.7 45.4 86.0 12.8 95.0 13.4 92.2 14.5 70.0 76.1 12.7 19.5 -2.7 -11.8 2.2 0.9 8.5 36.9 52.6
2009 3.9 -2.8 -6.2 23.7 24.2 3.5 7,004 6.6 1.9 2.4 1.00 1.00 2.7 0.3 2.54 -1.0 1.9 27.0 45.4 90.3 10.3 90.3 -0.1 88.9 1.3 72.7 68.0 9.0 -6.2 -0.2 -0.7 1.3 0.2 10.2 42.0 57.8
2010 7.6 24.4 11.6 24.6 26.6 3.5 7,575 6.5 4.9 3.5 1.00 1.00 2.1 4.3 2.05 -1.9 0.8 27.8 43.7 91.1 11.1 93.0 13.3 91.5 13.3 70.5 74.8 6.8 21.1 -2.9 -10.8 2.4 0.2 10.4 39.3 55.7
2011E 10.6 18.0 13.0 25.1 30.7 3.6 8,617 4.5 6.3 5.9 1.00 1.00 3.4 5.0 1.40 -2.3 0.1 27.6 41.8 85.7 8.4 94.5 17.3 91.5 15.3 78.6 85.8 28.5 32.4 -3.9 -12.7 2.8 0.5 10.9 35.6 45.3
2012F 6.0 8.0 12.5 26.6 32.5 3.6 8,986 5.0 5.2 5.6 1.00 1.00 3.6 5.0 1.50 -2.1 0.6 30.5 38.8 85.2 5.5 94.5 6.0 90.6 5.0 79.4 88.1 7.1 8.9 -4.2 -12.9 2.4 0.4 10.5 32.2 40.6
2013F 6.5 8.0 8.0 27.0 34.6 3.7 9,438 5.2 4.0 4.4 1.00 1.00 1.9 4.4 2.00 -1.6 1.1 30.2 37.2 86.0 7.5 96.3 8.5 91.0 7.0 80.9 89.8 8.6 8.5 -4.3 -12.4 2.5 0.8 10.5 30.3 37.5
7.2 8.8 6.4 17.1 15.5 3.2 4,788 10.2 3.5 2.9 1.00 1.00 -0.5 1.2 2.73 -2.5 2.0 25.0 66.2 78.9 8.7 90.3 6.6 87.1 9.9 68.6 69.5 19.5 18.4 -1.0 -6.6 1.0 1.0 7.6 49.0 71.5
(1) Real effective exchange rate, increase indicates appreciation. (2) Estimated by the Central American Monetary Council, cash holdings are assumed to be zero. (3) Non-financial public sector. (4) As an officially dollarized economy with no central bank, Panama does not have formalized FX reserve holdings. Source: INEC, IMF, Ministry of Finance, Banking Superintendence, Central American Monetary Council , Credit Suisse
48
14 March 2012
Early 2012 indicators suggest that economic activity is stabilizing or improving, after moderating in late 2011. Real GDP rose 5.5% yoy in Q4, after expanding an average 7.4% during the first three quarters of 2011; for the full-year 2011, real GDP growth averaged 6.9%. Last years expansion was driven by consumer spending, up 6.4%, on the back of employment growth and strong consumer sentiment. Gross fixed investment, however, grew a disappointing 5.2%. Private investment was up 11%, which is low by Peruvian standards, due to the surge in political risk related to the election of President Humala and concerns about global growth. Meanwhile, public investment plunged 17% last year, despite the governments efforts late in the year to revert the large spending cuts that it had implemented in early 2011 on concerns about a potential overheating of the economy. We project real GDP growth of 5% in 2012. We expect consumer spending growth to remain strong in the near term, building on last years momentum. Higher government spending particularly, in public investment and the potential for expansive monetary policy also point to domestic demand growing at a decent pace in the quarters ahead; we forecast domestic demand growth of 5.8% in 2012, down from 7.2% in 2011. Risks to our forecast come from private investment. Business sentiment is recovering only gradually as there is uncertainty about global growth and about the governments ability to resolve the conflicts surrounding the extraction of natural resources. We have penciled in a 5.5% expansion of private investment in 2012 but see upside/downside risk to this forecast. If there is a prompt and satisfactory resolution to the conflicts surrounding key mining projects, private investment growth would probably accelerate in H2; if, instead, the conflicts drag on, private investment growth would likely slow further. We expect the general governments overall fiscal surplus to fall to 1.2% of GDP in 2012 from 1.8% in 2011. Tax collection rose a strong 17% in 2011 and the tax intake reached a record 15.9% of GDP. We expect this years tax collection to remain flat as a share of GDP but the governments revenues should increase on account of the windfall tax on mining, about 0.4% of GDP, which is expected to be counted as non-tax revenue. Despite Humalas campaign promises, primary expenditures increased only 8% yoy in H2. We expect fiscal spending to grow at a faster pace this year, particularly at the regional level, but unless there is a sharp slowdown in activity, the general government will likely post another overall fiscal surplus this year. Unless there is sharp drop of mineral prices, we do not expect a significant deterioration of the current account in 2012. We project that the dollar value of exports, mainly minerals, will increase just 6% in 2012 after rising 30% in 2011. Mining production is not expected to increase meaningfully this year and with international mineral prices expected to remain largely flat, revenues from commodity exports are unlikely to grow much. Import growth should moderate as well; we project a 10% increase in dollar terms in 2012, after rising 28% in 2011, which should limit the deterioration of the trade balance. For 2012, we project a current account deficit of $3.1bn (1.6% of GDP), up from a $2.3bn deficit in 2012, mainly because of a narrower trade surplus. Our base-case scenario is still that monetary policy will be eased in H2 but upside surprises regarding domestic or global growth could delay the rate cuts or prevent them entirely. We expect the Peruvian central bank to move decisively to counter an economic slowdown and, given the potential that last years growth momentum may wear down by mid-year, we expect two 25bps rate cuts in H2, taking the reference rate to 3.75% by the end of 2012. Meanwhile, inflation has been adjusting down gradually, from a peak of 4.74% at the end of 2011, as the supply shocks that affected inflation last year are reversing. We expect headline CPI inflation to fall to 2.8% yoy by the end of 2012, within the banks 1%-3% range. The main risk to inflation comes from a surge in international oil prices as Peru is a net fuel importer.
49
14 March 2012
16 12 8 4 0 -4 -8
Change in inventories Public investment Government spending Private consumption Private investment Net exports GDP
20 15 10 5 0 -5 May-11
Electricity demand Imports of industrial inputs (3m ma) Domestic demand for cement
Nov-11
Mar-11
Apr-11
Aug-11
Dec-11
Feb-11
Oct-11
Sep-11
12F
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
70 55
75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35
Quarter-on-quarter (s.a.) Year-on-year
Business sentiment has yet to fully recover from last years lows, which does not bode well for the outlook of private sector investment in 2012.
Expectations for the economy in the next 3 months Expectations for hiring in the next 3 months Purchase orders over the previous month
May-10
May-11
Aug-10
Nov-10
Aug-11
Nov-11
Feb-10
Feb-11
65
We expect consumer spending to continue growing at a robust pace in the near term, as consumer sentiment is strong and employment growth is holding up relatively well.
60 55 50 45
3 7 5
Feb-12
Feb-12
Jan-11
Jun-11
Jul-11
Jan-12
50
14 March 2012
Exhibit 154: Nominal exchange rate and the central banks monthly FX intervention
Headline inflation Food inflation Non-food inflation
4 3 2 Net purchases of dollars ($ bn, left axis)* Soles per dollar (right axis)*
11 9 7 5 3 1
1 0 -1 -2 -3
Mar-12
*Data through 9 March 2012 Source: Central bank, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, Credit Suisse
150
50
We do not expect a significant worsening of the terms of trade and, thus, we do not envision a sizable deterioration of the trade surplus or the current account over the next year.
30
The general government accounts should remain in surplus in 2012 despite the likely increase in primary spending, particularly at the regional level. President Humalas approval ratings have rebounded but they may come under pressure again as the government seeks a resolution of the social conflicts surrounding the extraction of natural resources. Protests are expected to resume later in March.
Emerging Markets Quarterly
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 6
31
51
14 March 2012
2006 7.7 6.4 18.9 20.6 92.3 27.5 3,359 7.4 1.1 2.0 3.20 3.27 2.3 8.7 4.50 1.8 3.7 18.2 33.0 31.2 11.1 17.9 13.7 0.9 19.9 8.1 28.7 19.8 34.8 20.0 -7.6 2.2 2.9 3.1 3.5 1.1 28.9 22.0 6.9 31.3 109.1 17.3
2007 8.9 8.3 22.6 23.2 107.1 27.7 3,861 7.5 3.9 1.8 3.00 3.13 1.6 6.0 5.00 3.1 4.8 17.8 29.8 28.5 13.4 33.6 13.6 9.6 22.9 28.0 29.2 22.3 18.0 31.2 -8.4 2.5 1.5 1.4 5.4 3.1 32.9 21.0 11.9 30.7 105.3 27.7
2008 9.8 8.7 28.3 27.1 126.9 28.0 4,529 7.8 6.7 5.8 3.14 2.92 4.8 3.8 6.50 2.4 4.0 18.9 24.1 23.1 15.3 26.5 16.9 38.0 27.5 32.7 27.3 26.9 10.9 42.7 -8.8 2.9 -5.3 -4.2 6.2 1.2 34.8 20.0 14.9 27.5 100.5 31.2
2009 0.9 2.4 -8.6 24.5 127.0 28.3 4,486 7.9 0.2 3.0 2.88 3.01 -0.9 0.0 1.25 -1.5 -0.2 20.5 27.2 25.2 17.1 15.0 18.0 9.6 27.9 4.7 24.1 20.3 -11.7 -24.5 -7.5 2.9 0.2 0.2 5.2 1.8 35.7 20.7 15.0 28.1 116.7 33.2
2010 8.8 6.0 23.2 27.7 153.9 28.6 5,387 7.2 2.1 1.5 2.81 2.83 2.3 5.5 3.00 -0.2 1.0 20.3 23.4 21.9 19.6 30.5 18.9 19.2 28.6 16.5 25.5 22.7 28.3 35.1 -10.1 3.0 -2.6 -1.7 7.1 3.0 40.2 20.0 20.3 26.2 102.5 43.8
2011E 6.9 6.4 5.2 27.3 176.9 28.8 6,133 7.0 4.7 3.4 2.70 2.75 4.5 12.5 4.25 1.8 3.0 19.2 21.7 19.7 20.3 16.0 19.9 17.6 31.0 21.0 28.6 24.6 29.0 24.7 -12.6 3.2 -2.3 -1.3 7.5 0.8 43.2 20.2 22.9 24.4 85.2 48.9
2012F 5.0 5.4 7.0 27.8 197.2 29.1 6,772 6.8 2.8 3.5 2.65 2.66 2.1 11.1 3.75 1.2 2.3 19.8 20.0 18.1 20.8 10.0 20.7 12.0 33.4 16.0 27.3 24.1 6.5 9.4 -12.6 3.2 -3.1 -1.6 7.2 1.2 44.7 21.4 23.3 22.7 83.0 60.4
2013F 5.5 5.5 7.9 28.4 215.9 29.4 7,342 6.5 2.0 2.5 2.60 2.61 1.4 4.0 3.75 0.8 1.8 20.3 18.2 16.5 21.2 10.0 21.1 10.0 35.7 15.0 26.9 24.5 7.8 11.3 -12.6 3.2 -4.3 -2.0 7.2 1.2 45.5 21.4 24.1 21.1 78.3 64.9
6.8 4.6 12.0 18.6 79.4 27.2 2,916 7.6 1.5 1.6 3.43 3.30 -6.6 0.0 3.25 -0.5 1.4 18.9 37.8 35.6 10.9 32.2 15.7 20.0 21.2 17.1 24.8 19.2 32.8 21.4 -5.1 1.8 1.1 1.4 2.6 2.8 28.7 22.3 6.4 36.1 145.8 14.1
(1) Real effective exchange rate, increase indicates appreciation. (2) Minimum wage. (3) Public sector debt net of intergovernmental loans. (4) Scheduled amortizations for public sector only.
52
14 March 2012
Political uncertainty is as heightened as ever in Venezuela; the most critical question is whether President Chavez will stand for re-election this October. Chavez remains the Socialist (PSUV) partys presidential candidate for now, but in our view, the probability that he will not run has risen since the recurrence of his cancer in late February. There is strong pressure on Chavez to stay in the race, though, as polling data show that the most prominent alternative candidates are less popular than unified opposition nominee Henrique Capriles Radonski. They also represent different factions within Chavismo, presenting the risk that Chavezs allies would not remain united in his absence. Thus, we think Chavez will stay in the race as long as his health permits. Chavez can still win, but the race could be even closer than we expected before his relapse. Beyond his access to substantial financial, institutional and political resources and any sympathy boost, Chavezs prospects may now swing on his ability to convince independent voters concerned about political stability that he is healthy enough to serve another six-year term. We expect transparency regarding Chavezs illness to remain limited, though, and for suggestions that his prognosis is grave to continue influencing Venezuela and PDVSA asset prices. A PSUV primary election or changes to the date of the presidential election could signal that Chavez is increasingly likely to withdraw from the race, in our view. Holding a primary, which Chavez would likely win, could allow the PSUV to identify a potential successor in the runner-up. Further altering the presidential election date, currently set for 7 October 2012, could indicate a desire to optimize Chavezs treatment and campaign calendars in a manner inconsistent with claims that he is recovering well. If constitutional procedures are followed, elections should be held by the end of 2012 and the president-elect would take office in January 2013. If Chavez does not run, we expect the opposition to remain unified and think Capriles would be well positioned to win an election. Our view is based on the oppositions successful and decisive primary process, endorsements of Capriles by the other precandidates, and weak popular support for Chavista alternatives. For example, head to head against Vice President Jaua, the most popular of Chavezs allies according to Datanalisiss February poll, Capriles received 38% support (5% of Chavistas, 42% of independents, and 89% of pro-opposition respondents), while Jaua received 24% (51% of Chavistas, 10% of independents, and 1% pro-opposition respondents). In this case, the main risk could be political violence targeting Capriles and other opposition leaders. We do not rule out political instability or elections being canceled if Chavez does not run. A negative scenario for political stability is one in which Chavez is absent, the lack of a clear successor spurs infighting among the Chavista factions, elections are postponed or cancelled and the military eventually steps in to restore order. We think that this remains a lower probability scenario based on recent statements by key stakeholders and that any military intervention would probably be temporary. PSUV unity could depend on how close to elections Chavez were to withdraw and who succeeded him; it may be most vulnerable after an electoral defeat. On the economic front, we maintain our forecast that real GDP growth will reach 4.5% in 2012, accelerating slightly from 4.2% in 2011. We expect domestic demand to keep strengthening on the back of higher politically driven public investment and current spending on wages, cash transfers, and subsidies, mainly. Venezuelas economy could probably grow even faster in the absence of years of elevated inflation, foreign exchange restrictions, electricity supply constraints, and a difficult investment climate; the persistence of these conditions has likely decreased the fiscal multiplier. Recent results suggest that the new price control regime has succeeded in slowing inflation, but we expect this to be a temporary phenomenon. Twelve-month headline Caracas CPI fell to 24.8% in February, from 29.0% in December 2011. We project that this figure will rise back towards 29% over the course of this year, though, as strong fiscal and monetary expansion continue ahead of Octobers presidential election and businesses attempt to pass on losses from the price controls.
53
14 March 2012
We do not anticipate unpopular or inflationary changes to the structure of Venezuelas FX regime before presidential elections in October. The government and PDVSA will likely continue to sell dollar bonds for bolivares in the domestic market in order to supplement the supply of dollar assets and contain inflationary pressures. Still, we are revising our combined Venezuela and PDVSA dollar issuance forecast down to $9bn in 2012, from $12bn previously. The window for USD bond sales is narrower this year, in our view, as government officials, including PDVSA, will likely become more focused on budget execution and campaigning during Q3 2012. We also perceive heightened election-related sensitivity on the part of the economic authorities regarding heavy dollar issuance or requesting an increase in the borrowing limit set by the 2012 debt law (which permits bolivar- and dollar-denominated debt sales up to a combined $14.6bn or 3.4% of GDP) as they did in 2011. The public sector probably needs to issue at least $5bn-$6bn before the end of H1 2012, according to our calculations. We estimate that the central bank has enough dollar bonds to supply its SITME market through the end of June at the current monthly average volume of $40mn per day. At the same rate, the central bank would need at least another $5bn of USD bonds to sell in H2 2012.4 We expect the public sector as a whole to sell dollar bonds in excess of what is used to supply SITME, though, because a portion of the new issues could also be allocated directly to private sector participants. For now we remain comfortable with Venezuelas capacity to service its foreign liabilities. The government has only $0.7bn in external amortizations in 2012 and PDVSA has none. The two entities owe a combined $3.3bn in 2013. Meanwhile, in Q4, the sum of the central banks international reserves and other public sector liquid foreign assets ($67bn) well exceeded public sector external bond debt ($43bn). If we add the public sectors external loans to external bond debt, though, the total ($72bn) surpassed the public sectors liquid assets in Q4. We would grow more concerned about this if the Venezuelan oil mix price fell below $75-$80 per barrel, but that is not our central case. In the absence of significant political instability, we think Venezuelas sovereign debt ratings (B2 from Moodys, B+ from Fitch and S&P) are unlikely to be downgraded during 2012 given the stable outlooks assigned to all ratings and supportive oil prices. The government continues to pressure PDVSA to boost social and fiscal contributions as well as increase production in the Orinoco belt ahead of elections. PDVSA compensates for the squeeze on its cash flow by issuing debt, running arrears with suppliers, and postponing dividend payments to private partners. Plans to increase oil supplies to China to 1mn bpd by 2015 could further strain PDVSA if tax shields which compensate for non-cash exports under Venezuelas agreements with China are not reinstated. An opposition victory would likely be more positive for the oil sectors prospects than a Chavez re-election. However, even if the opposition wins, some of PDVSAs partners and other potential investors may still be inclined to wait for a new administration to prove that governability will not be a major issue. 2013 will likely be a more difficult year regardless of this years political developments. Whomever is in power should begin amending unsustainable fiscal and FX policies. Our 2013 projections assume an over 40% devaluation of the bolivar to 6.150 per USD to start. The resulting inflation and a relatively tighter fiscal stance mean that real wage losses are likely to resume and real GDP growth should slow to around 1.5%. In addition, Venezuela could hear about multi-billion dollar arbitration claims next year. The possibility also remains that President Chavez is re-elected but unable to complete a new term due to his illness. According to the constitution, fresh elections would then be called, potentially reinvigorating many of the current political uncertainties.
Our figures do not include the central banks secondary market purchases to augment its holdings.
54
14 March 2012
Support for President Chavez rose from November 2011 through early 2012, although 36% of the population remained independent as of Datanalisiss last survey. Upcoming polls will incorporate the impact of the successful opposition primary won by Henrqiue Capriles Radonski on 12 February and the news of President Chavezs relapse later the same month.
65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 Feb-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Aug-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Sep-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Feb-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Feb-12
50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15
Pro-Opposition Pro-Chavez
Neither
Fiscal expansion has driven economic growth since the middle of 2011, while the oil sectors performance has been mixed recently. Real wage gains have supported increased private consumption, and probably President Chavezs popularity as well.
GDP
Oil
Non-oil
60 50 40 30 20
100 90 80
Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11
Source: Central bank, Credit Suisse
10 0
Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11
Credit and M2, which expanded by 48% and 51% year on year, respectively, in 2011, will likely continue rising rapidly this year. Meanwhile, the government has increased approved sales of dollars in CADIVI (to an average of $147mn per day in Q4 2011), which may help contain inflation and limit shortages of imported goods ahead of the elections.
Jan-09
Jan-10
Jan-11
Jan-12
Feb-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Sep-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Feb-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Feb-12
Nominal wages Nominal private sector wages Nominal public sector wages Caracas CPI
55
14 March 2012
Average sales of dollar bonds in the central banks SITME market were $40mn per day over the last 30 days, compared to an average of $36mn per day since SITME was created in June 2010. The PDVSA 2021 bond, issued in November 2011 in a $2.4bn private transaction with the central bank, should continue to trickle out to the external market over the coming months.
Exhibit 165: FX-denominated bond sales in SITME (at 5.3 bolivares per USD)
$mn, as of 12 March 2012
70 60 50 40 30
Exhibit 166: Total sales of selected bonds in SITME thus far in 2012
USDmn, as of 12 March 2012
700 600 500 400 300 200
20
100
10
0 PDVSA VENZ 2021 2026 VENZ 2027 VENZ PDVSA VENZ 2022 2017N 2031
The public sectors net external asset position deteriorated slightly in Q4 2011, a trend which may continue in 2012 as the government spends heavily and continues borrowing abroad. The sum of central bank FX reserves and other liquid public sector FX holdings still exceed external bond debt by $24bn in Q4, but was over $5bn shy of the total including the public sectors external loans.
Exhibit 167: Public and private sector net external asset position
$bn
180 Public 165 150 135 120 105 90 75 60 45 30 15 0 -15 4Q01 4Q03
Private
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 4Q07
4Q05
4Q07
4Q09
4Q11
4Q08
4Q09
4Q10
4Q11
The public sectors external amortization profile remains manageable, although the recent rally would have been a good time for PDVSA to try to extend maturities of bonds coming due between 2014 and 2017. We expect Venezuelas external accounts to remain in surplus, as a sharp and sustained drop in oil prices is not our central case.
14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
PDVSA Government
Oil Exports (lhs) Current account balance (lhs) Trade balance (lhs) Price of Venezuela oil mix (rhs)
CS Forecast
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027+
56
14 March 2012
(1) Based on CS forecasts for the official exchange rate. (2) Expressed in strong bolivares for all years, though the change took place in January 2008. (3) Real effective exchange rate, increase indicates appreciation. (4) Public and private sector wages. (5) Consolidation of Central Government, PDVSA, Non-Financial Public Enterprises, Venezuelan Social Security Institute and Deposit and Guarantee Fund. (6) Central government, regional governments, PDVSA; does not include liabilities of other public institutions such as the Central bank, National Development Bank, Foreign Trade Bank, Industrial Bank of Venezuela and Andean Region Development Bank. (7) Central government only for 2004-2009. Source: Central Bank, INE, Ministry of Finance, PDVSA, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, Credit Suisse
57
14 March 2012
58
14 March 2012
59
14 March 2012
Hungary avoided recession in 2011, despite the weak growth in the euro area. Real GDP rose 0.3% qoq in Q4 2011, which represented only a marginal slowdown following 0.4% qoq in Q3 2011. Net exports continued to drive growth, contributing 1.1pps to quarter-on-quarter real GDP growth, as exports were up 1.0% qoq, and imports contracted 0.1% qoq. On the other hand, domestic demand continued to contract in Q4: household spending was down 0.5% qoq, government spending contracted 0.3% qoq, and investment spending was 1.2% lower in Q4 than in Q3. We believe that the economy continued to operate substantially below its capacity in 2011. In our view, Hungary can avoid a recession in 2012, too. Although Hungary's export performance will probably be adversely affected by the slowdown in the euro area, we believe that net exports can still make a positive contribution to real GDP growth in 2012. In our view, household spending will also support growth, recovering gradually by 0.6% in 2012 and 1.7% in 2013, while investment spending will probably remain broadly flat in 2012 and 2013. In keeping with this outlook, we forecast that full-year real GDP growth will reach 1.0% in 2012 and 1.8% in 2013 and that the output gap will remain negative throughout our forecast horizon. Hungarys gross external financing requirements remain large. We estimate that the current account surplus was around 1.4% of GDP in 2011, and that it will probably shrink to around 0.4% of GDP in 2012, dampened by the projected slowdown in exports and the pick-up in imports driven by the recovery in household spending. In the meantime, the forint remains exposed to spillover from the crisis in the euro area, given Hungarys large stock of gross external debt which reached around 139bn (133% of GDP) at end-September 2011, of which around 25bn (24% of GDP) had an original maturity of one year or less. Furthermore, Hungarys medium- and long-term external debt amortizations will reach around 12bn (11% of GDP) in 2012, according to our estimates. The government shows willingness to reach an agreement with the IMF, but talks were interrupted by contentious amendments to the central bank law. The amendments approved by parliament in December stipulated an increase in the maximum number of Monetary Council (MC) members from seven to nine and the maximum number of deputy governors from two to three. The bill also allowed the prime minister (instead of the governor) to nominate the deputy governors. Additionally, an amendment to the constitution allowed the merger of the central bank and the financial supervisory authority to form a new body, which would be headed by a new president, while the central bank's current governor and the financial supervisory authoritys chairman would serve as deputy presidents. These legislative changes sparked criticism from the ECB and the European Commission (EC), raising concerns about the independence of the central bank. On 17 January, the EC launched infringement proceedings against Hungary and said that a counter amendment to the central bank law would be a precondition to formal negotiations with the IMF and the EC about financial assistance. The government pledged to comply with the EC's required amendment, but has yet to deliver. To us, this indicates that the government's resolve to reach an agreement is waning. Furthermore, the infringement process also involves measures affecting the judiciary and the data protection authority, and we believe that the government is unlikely to compromise on these issues, which will probably continue to create political noise and may delay the start of talks with the IMF and the EC. Against this backdrop, we maintain our view that Hungary is likely to reach an agreement with the IMF this year, but we note a high risk that this is delayed to H2 2012, if market sentiment towards Hungary remains favorable.
60
14 March 2012
In the meantime, fiscal consolidation is on track, in our view. The 2012 budget targets a 2.5% of GDP general government budget deficit, containing structural measures in several areas, such as retirement schemes, labor market regulation, and medical subsidies. It also envisages a nominal wage freeze in the public sector and revenue-increasing measures including a hike in indirect taxes and an increase in the social security contribution rate. We believe that the government will be able to carry out most of its reform plans, which would bring Hungarys general government budget deficit to around 2.7% of GDP in 2012. According to our estimates, such fiscal consolidation can stabilize Hungarys general government gross debt below 77% of GDP. The EUs Excessive Deficit Procedure (EDP) puts pressure on the government to continue fiscal adjustment. The EC projects that the budget deficit will be 2.8% of GDP in 2012, but it will once again exceed the Maastricht threshold of 3.0% of GDP and reach around 3.25% of GDP in 2013. Consequently, on 22 February, the EC proposed, as a sanction, to suspend 0.5bn in cohesion funds for Hungary from 2013. The amount represents about 0.5% of GDP and around one-third of Hungary's cohesion fund allocations for 2013. The European Council approved the Commissions proposal on 13 March, and set 22 June as a deadline for Hungary to take effective action to reduce its fiscal deficit to avoid the sanction. We believe that the required fiscal adjustment is relatively modest (around 0.5% of GDP) and that the government is likely to comply with the EUs expectations. Uncertainty about an IMF program led to forint depreciation, which prompted the MC to raise the policy rate by 50bps to 7.00% in December. Subsequently, the MC adopted a wait-and-see stance in January, and moved in our view towards a dovish bias in February. CPI inflation rose from a low of 3.1% yoy in July to 5.9% yoy in March, and on 29 February the MC assessed that "the consumer price index is expected to rise significantly, reflecting the effects of increases in VAT and excise duties as well as the depreciation of the forint exchange rate in the second half of 2011," but the MC concluded that "low inflation dynamics due to weak domestic demand will be the main determinant of consumer prices as the effects of the indirect tax increases wane." We believe that the forint exchange rate weakness continues to represent an upside risk to inflation. Nevertheless, we believe that the authorities' re-engagement with the IMF could stabilize the exchange rate, and we maintain our end-2012 EURHUF forecast at 280. In our view, such exchange rate stabilization could help to bring CPI inflation closer to the central bank's 3.0% yoy target towards end-2012. Against this backdrop, we maintain our view that if Hungary enters an IMF program, the MC will be able to gradually lower the policy rate by 100bps, and in keeping with this, we maintain our end-2012 policy rate forecast at 6.00%. Fitch downgraded Hungarys long-term foreign-currency sovereign credit rating by one notch to BB+ (below investment grade) on 6 January. Fitch's downgrade reflected further deterioration in the country's fiscal and external financing environment and growth outlook, caused in part by further unorthodox economic policies which are undermining investor confidence and complicating the agreement of a new IMF/EU deal. This followed S&Ps downgrade on 21 December of Hungary's long-term foreigncurrency sovereign credit rating by one notch to BB+ (below investment grade), and its outlook to negative, reflecting S&Ps opinion that the predictability and credibility of Hungary's policy framework continues to weaken. Moody's downgraded Hungary's long-term foreign-currency sovereign credit rating by one notch to Ba1 (below investment grade), and kept its outlook negative on 24 November, due to "the rising uncertainty surrounding the country's ability to meet its medium-term targets for fiscal consolidation and public sector debt reduction, particularly given Hungary's increasingly constrained medium-term growth prospects."
61
14 March 2012
Following 0.4% qoq growth in Q3, real GDP was up 0.3% qoq in Q4 2011, driven by exports. In Q4 2011, the seasonally adjusted level of real GDP was around 4.6% lower than at its peak in Q1 2008, which suggests that there is still a substantial negative output gap.
3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 Q4-09
Source: KSH
8.6
Net exports Inventories Investment spending Government spending Household spending GDP, % qoq Q2-10 Q4-10 Q2-11 Q4-11
8.5
Hungarys growth performance depends on the external environment, and given the slowdown in the euro area, Hungary's export performance will probably be adversely affected. We project that household spending will recover gradually, but investment spending will remain broadly flat in 2012.
4 2
110
0 -2
100 -4 90 Industrial production in Germany, sa 2005=100 Industrial production in Hungary, sa 2005=100 Jan-11 Jan-12 -6 -8 -10 Dec-09
Source: KSH, Credit Suisse
Retail sales Real wages, excl. bonuses Private employment Dec-10 Dec-11
80 Jan-10
Source: Eurostat, KSH
Foreign trade balance, 12-m rolling % of GDP, right scale Exports, sa bn Imports, sa bn
10 8 6 4 2 0 Jan-12
15 10 5 0 -5 -10 Q3-09
Transfers balance Income balance Services balance Trade balance Current account balance
Jan-11
Q3-10
Q3-11
62
14 March 2012
Non-residents holdings of forint-denominated government securities surged from around HUF 3,760bn in mid-December to HUF 4,030bn by March. Uncertainty about an IMF program led to forint depreciation, which prompted the MC to raise the policy rate in December. Subsequently, the MC adopted a wait-and-see stance in January, and moved towards a dovish bias in February.
4,100 3,900 3,700 3,500 3,300 3,100 2,900 2,700 2,500 2,300 2,100 Mar-10
Source: AKK
Sep-10
Mar-11
Sep-11
Mar-12
We believe that the forint exchange rate weakness continues to represent an upside risk to inflation. CPI inflation rose from a low of 3.1% yoy in July 2011 to 5.9% yoy in March 2012, and core inflation rose from a low of 1.1% yoy in February 2011 to 3.8% yoy in March 2012.
6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Feb-11
Energy Food Alcohol and tobacco Core (CS estimate) CPI, % yoy
May-11 Aug-11
Nov-11
Feb-12
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Feb-11
CPI inflation KSH core inflation* CS measure of core inflation** Run-rate of CS core inflation***
May-11
Aug-11
Nov-11
Feb-12
*excluding unprocessed food, energy and regulated prices; **excluding food, energy, alcohol and tobacco; ***calculated as the annualized three-month moving average of the de-seasonalized month-on-month core inflation. Source: Eurostat, KSH, Credit Suisse
11
10
85
80
9 0
75
8 -1
7 Aug-10
Feb-11
Aug-11
-2 Feb-12
70 2008
2010
2012F
2014F
63
14 March 2012
(1) Data from 2005 exclude premiums and bonuses. (2) An increase in the real effective exchange rate (CPI-deflated) indicates appreciation. (3) ESA95 consolidated fiscal accounts of the general government excluding one-off transfers from pension funds to the government budget as revenues. (4) The central government balance has a narrow definition and is reported on a cash basis. (5) ESA95 represents consolidated fiscal accounts of the general government on an accrual basis. (6) Scheduled amortizations of medium- and long-term external debt of both the public and private sector. Sources: AKK, National Bank of Hungary, Ministry for National Economy, KSH, IMF, JEDH, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, Haver Analytics, Credit Suisse
64
14 March 2012
Real GDP growth has been moderating since Q4 2010 and was 4.7% in 2011. In Q4 2011, real GDP growth slowed further (albeit modestly) to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (saar) of 3.2% qoq from 3.4% qoq saar in Q3 2011. This extended the sequential slowdown since the peak of 7.6% qoq saar in Q4 2010 that was driven by a decline in all components growth pace except that of government spending. Government spending rose sharply, up 8.5% qoq saar during Q4 2011, contributing 1.9pps to annualized quarter-on-quarter real GDP growth and offsetting the contraction in household spending and in exports. Household spending contracted 0.8% qoq saar, shaving 0.5pp off annualized quarter-on-quarter real GDP growth in Q4 2011. Investment spending, which was a key driver of real GDP growth over the past seven quarters, rose 4.7% qoq saar in Q4 2011, slowing from double-digit growth in each of the quarters since Q1 2010. Net exports shaved 0.8pp off annualized quarter-on-quarter real GDP growth as export volumes declined more sharply than import volumes. Export volumes contracted (7.0% qoq saar in Q4 2011) for the second quarter in a row as the global economic environment remained adverse. Meanwhile, import volumes contracted 5.2% qoq saar in Q4 2011. Although we expect real GDP growth to continue to slow, the probability of a sharp decline in economic activity is lower now than it was late last year, in our assessment. Recent frequent indicators, such as the central banks State of Economy Index (SEI) suggest that the pace of real GDP growth will likely continue to slow in the coming period. Consequently, since the publication of our previous Emerging Markets Quarterly (7 December 2011), we have revised lower our 2012 real GDP growth forecast to 3.0% (from 3.4% previously) and our household spending growth to 2.0% (from 3.1%). In our view, the contraction in household spending in Q4 2011 is likely to reverse in 2012 driven by the revival in consumer confidence on the back of the improving global sentiment. However, we envisage household spending growth will be slower than the 3.6% in 2011. We are also encouraged by the latest labor market data indicating that the unemployment rate fell to a historical low of 5.4% at end-2011 from 5.6% at the end of Q3 2011. A potential war with Iran would pose a risk to Israels economic outlook, in our view, but we think a war with Iran (if one materializes) would only have a one-off impact on the economy. In the case of a war between Israel and Iran (which is not our baseline scenario), we think Israel would be affected in a way that would be broadly similar to the five-week war between Israel and Hezbollah in the summer of 2006. (We think that Hezbollah would react on Irans behalf. However, somewhat differently from the 2006 war, Iran would probably join by firing medium-range ballistic missiles as well.) Based on the 2006 experience and most of the wars and combats Israel has experienced (directly or indirectly) since the mid-1980s, we project that the impact on Israels economy will be limited if our baseline assumptions for the modalities and extent of the conflict with Iran were to materialize. During the 2006 war (in Q3 2006), there was a one-off 1.9% qoq saar contraction in real GDP, driven by a contraction in exports and a slowdown in household spending, but the economy recovered rapidly in the subsequent quarter. We expect the shekel to remain weak in the short term. Several factors which, in our view, are currently supporting the weakness of the shekel against the dollar are likely to remain in place. First, we estimate that the four-quarter rolling current account balance reversed from a surplus of 0.8% of GDP in Q3 2011 to a deficit of 0.6% of GDP in Q4 2011. (The balance of payments data for Q4 2011 is due to be released on 14 March.) Furthermore, the 12-month rolling foreign trade deficit (which is the main driver of the current account balance) continued to widen in early 2012 and is likely to deteriorate further, in our view, on the back of unfavorable terms of trade. The foreign trade deficit deteriorated to 7.3% of GDP on a 12-month rolling basis in February 2012 from 6.2% of GDP in December 2011. Second, the non-residents Makam sell-off (T-bills issued by the central bank) has intensified over the past months. Non-residents sold around $8.9bn
65
14 March 2012
worth of Makam from May 2011 to January 2012 due to looser monetary policy and the regulatory measures aimed at reducing non-residents activity in short-term instruments. Third, the geopolitical tension with Iran might escalate further. However, we think there is limited scope for the shekel to depreciate further, due to Israels relatively strong external position (only around 18% of total outstanding government debt is denominated in foreign currency and FX reserves are considered high by both historical and international standards). Against this backdrop, we project USDILS at 3.85 at end-2012. Headline inflation fell to the central banks target in January. Headline inflation fell to 2.0% yoy in January from a peak of 4.2% yoy in June 2011, driven by a broad-based slowdown in all major components of CPI inflation. Food inflation declined to -0.2% yoy in January from 6.0% yoy in June and shaved 1.0pp off year-on-year headline inflation. Core inflation (our definition of core inflation excludes energy, food, alcohol, and tobacco) was 1.9% yoy in January compared to 3.0% yoy in June and shaved 0.8pp off year-on-year headline inflation (0.3pp of which is attributable to the slowdown in housing price inflation, which was 5.0% yoy in January 2012 compared to 6.2% yoy in June 2011). During the same period, energy prices shaved 0.2pp off year-on-year headline inflation and tobacco prices contributed a 0.1pp drop. We envisage that the base effects for food prices will drive headline inflation higher in H2 2012, toward the 3.0% upper barrier of the inflation target range. We project that headline inflation will decline further towards 1.7%-1.9% yoy in Q1 2012. However, we forecast that year-on-year food price inflation will pick up again in H2 2011 once the base effect of the one-off decline in food prices in H2 2011 fades. (The decline in food prices in H2 2011 was partly due to organized price cuts by large manufacturers and distributors on the back of the tent protests last summer.) We also envisage that while housing price inflation should moderate to around 4.0% yoy by end-2012 (from 5.0% yoy in January 2012), the year-on-year non-housing core components should climb higher as the shekels weakness passes through to prices. We think that elevated global commodity prices are to a large extent already priced in the current year-on-year energy inflation (mainly via the fuel sub-component). Nonetheless, energy prices pose an upside risk to inflation, especially through their second-round effects. We think the Monetary Committees (MC) bias is still dovish, but the monetary policy outlook has become more ambiguous recently. The MC cut the policy rate by a cumulative 75bps to 2.50% between September 2011 and January 2012 in three separate 25bps cuts as the growth outlook deteriorated. However, the abating risks in the euro area alongside an increase in inflation expectations in Israel (which rose from January to February by around 0.2pp to the 2.4%-2.6% range, both according to the capital market data and analysts survey) have turned the monetary policy outlook more ambiguous recently. However, in our understanding, the MC remains primarily focused on the subdued domestic growth outlook and is still likely to cut the policy rate by an additional 25bps in the coming months. We also base our forecast on recent public statements by Governor Fischer and other MC members which, in our view, point to a still cautious outlook for the euro area. A sharp fall in domestic housing prices might lead to a substantial easing of monetary policy, but recent developments in the housing market somewhat abate these concerns, although such a risk is still not off the table. The Ministry of Finance will likely struggle to restrain the budget deficit in the year ahead, in our view. The budget deficit overshot the 2.9% of GDP target by 0.4pp of GDP in 2011, mainly due to weaker-than-projected revenues. In addition, since the publication of our previous Emerging Markets Quarterly (7 December 2011) several unfavorable developments have increased the risk for an elevated budget deficit in 2012. First, the rise in tension with Iran is leading to a looser defense expenditure policy. Second, the higher probability that elections will be brought forward from end-2013 poses an additional risk factor for fiscal policy. Third, tax revenues might weaken further in 2012 as the economy continues to slow. We forecast a budget deficit of 3.3% of GDP in 2012, the same as in 2011 but higher than the original 2.0% of GDP target (in the 2011-2012 budget book released in October 2010).
Emerging Markets Quarterly
66
14 March 2012
Real GDP growth has been moderating since Q4 2010, driven by a decline in all components pace of growth except that of government spending. The State of the Economy Index (SEI) rose 0.15% mom in January, slightly lower than the monthly pace of growth in Q4 2011, suggesting that real GDP growth is continuing to moderate.
Q2-10
Q4-10
Q2-11
110 Jan-09
Jan-10
Jan-11
0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 Jan-12
Note: changes in inventories includes statistical discrepancy. Source: Central Bureau of Statistics, Credit Suisse
Dec-08
Jun-10
Dec-11
Note: The chart only shows the regional breakdown of goods exports (which account for approximately 70% of total exports), while data on the regional breakdown of services exports (which account for the reminder 30% of total exports) are not available. Source: Central Bureau of Statistics, Credit Suisse
The shekel will probably remain weak in the short term, partly on the back of investors concerns about the intensifying tension between Israel and Iran. Non-residents sold around $8.9bn worth of Makam between May 2011 and January 2012, taking their holdings in Makam to the lowest level since March 2010. We believe this decline was driven by monetary policy easing and regulated measures aimed at reducing non-residents activity in short-term instruments.
Emerging Markets Quarterly
Exhibit 187: USDILS and the shekels nominal effective exchange rate
98 96 94 92 90 88 86 84 82 Feb-09
Nominal Effective Exchange Rate (100=2007) USDILS (right)
12 10 8 6 4 2
Feb-10
Feb-11
0 Jan-10
Jul-10
Jan-11
Jul-11
Note: Nominal effective exchange rate is a weight average index composed from 28 currencies reflecting 38 of Israels trade partners. Source: Bank of Israel, Credit Suisse
67
14 March 2012
On our estimates, the fourquarter rolling current account balance reversed from a surplus in Q3 2011 into a deficit in Q4 2011. Furthermore, the 12-month rolling foreign trade deficit (which is the main driver of the current account balance) continued to widen in early 2012 and is likely to deteriorate further, in our view, on the back of unfavorable terms of trade.
16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 Q4-08
Current transfers account Income account Services account Goods account (Trade balance) Current account surplus
900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 Feb-12
Q4-09
Q4-10
Q4-11E
0 Feb-08
Feb-09
Feb-10
Feb-11
Source: Central Bureau of Statistics, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, Credit Suisse
We forecast that year-on-year food price inflation will pick up again in H2 2011, taking the year-on-year headline inflation higher toward the 3.0% upper barrier of the inflation target range. However, in our understanding, the MC remains primarily focused on the subdued growth outlook for Israel and is still likely to cut the policy rate by an additional 25bps to 2.25% in the coming months.
6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 Jan-11
Housing Other
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Dec-09
BoI policy rate, % BoI policy rate, % (CS forecast) CPI inflation, % yoy CPI inflation, % yoy (CS forecast)
Apr-11
Jul-11
Oct-11
Jan-12
Dec-10
Dec-11
Dec-12
The housing market has been reviving since November 2011 as more buyers have returned to the market and prices have started to rise again. However, the transaction volumes are still much lower than in previous years. Several unfavorable developments have increased the risk for a larger budget deficit in 2012. We forecast the budget deficit will reach 3.3% of GDP in 2012, the same as in 2011 but higher than the target of 2.0% of GDP.
Exhibit 193: The Housing Price Index (HPI) and new mortgages taken by households
30%
New mortgages - ILS, billions (right) Annualized 3mma of % mom change in HPI
Exhibit 194: Central government fiscal balance and revenues from tax collection
12-month rolling, % of GDP
1 0
Budget balance
28 27 26 25
20%
-1 -2
10%
-3
0% 3
-4 -5
24 23 22 Feb-12
-10% Jan-10
Jul-10
Jan-11
Jul-11
2 Jan-12
-6 Feb-08
Feb-09
Feb-10
Feb-11
Note: The government deficit is excluding net credit. Source: Ministry of Finance, Credit Suisse
68
14 March 2012
(1) Annual average of monthly average wages in the economy. (2) Real effective exchange rate; increase indicates appreciation. (3) Net of central bank FX reserves. (4) Principal repayments of public and private sector. Source: Central Statistical Bureau, Bank of Israel, Ministry of Finance, Credit Suisse
69
14 March 2012
Poland's annualized quarter-on-quarter real GDP growth rate was stable in a range of 4%-5% throughout 2011, despite the weakening of growth in the euro area. Real GDP growth remained robust in Q4 2011 at 1.1% qoq, broadly unchanged from 1.0% qoq in Q3 2011. According to our estimates based on the Eurostat data, investment spending contributed the most to quarter-on-quarter real GDP growth, 0.6pp in Q4, unchanged from Q3. The contribution of government spending to quarter-on-quarter real GDP growth rose to +0.2pp in Q4 from -0.1pp in Q3. In the meantime, however, the contribution of household spending declined modestly to 0.2pp in Q4 from 0.3pp in Q3, and the contribution of net exports also declined to 0.1pp in Q4 from 0.9pp in Q3, as export-growth slowed marginally and import-growth picked up. We believe that the economy has been operating over its capacity in 2011. There is a decent amount of data evidence that supports the idea that a slowdown is underway. Industrial production growth slowed from 0.9% mom in December to 0.4% mom in January. The manufacturing PMI declined from 52.2 in January to 50.0 in February, and the forward-looking new orders component of the PMI also weakened from 52.7 in January to 48.6 in February. However, given the recent strong IFO readings in Germany, we believe that the slowdown will be relatively mild, and quarter-on-quarter real GDP growth in Poland will probably reach around 0.6% in Q1 and 0.5% in Q2 this year. We project that annualized quarter-on-quarter real GDP growth will be in a range of 2%-3% throughout 2012. We believe that the strong growth in investment spending in 2011 was driven by EU-funded public investments, which will probably peak in H1 2012 and will drop markedly in H2 2012, after the Euro 2012 football championship in June. In the meantime, in our view, household spending growth will probably continue to slow in 2012, and the contribution of net exports to overall GDP growth will remain broadly flat. We project that following 3.0% growth in 2011, household spending will grow 1.6% in 2012 and 3.8% in 2013, supported by the ongoing (albeit slowing) increase in personal income on account of rising employment and wages. We believe that employment growth will moderate from 2.3% yoy in 2011 to around 1.0% yoy in 2012, while nominal wage growth will probably remain broadly steady between 4.0% and 5.0% yoy in 2012. In keeping with this outlook, we forecast that full-year real GDP growth will reach 3.0% in 2012, and 3.5% in 2013, while the economy will probably continue to operate marginally over its capacity, which will put upward pressure on wages. The current account deficit narrowed to 4.1% of GDP in 2011 from 4.5% of GDP in 2010. On a 12-month rolling basis, the current account deficit reached its peak in July 2011, around 5.0% of GDP, and narrowed in H2 2011. This narrowing in the current account deficit was mainly driven by a narrowing foreign trade deficit, from 2.1% of GDP in the 12 months to July to 1.5% of GDP in the 12 months to December (including both goods and services). This was mainly driven by a pick-up in exports, which may not be sustained in 2012, in our view. Meanwhile, the deficit on the income balance remained around 3.7% of GDP in 2011, broadly unchanged compared to 2010. Against this backdrop, we believe that the current account deficit is likely to widen again in 2012 (to around 5.0% of GDP), as domestic demand growth will probably continue to outperform external demand growth. In the meantime, the deficit due to net errors and omissions (which reached 1.8% of GDP in 2011 from 2.0% of GDP in 2010), is likely to remain large, in our view. Stable sources of external financing (EU transfers and net FDI inflows) increased in 2011 and were almost adequate to finance the full current account deficit. The stable sources of external financing amounted to around $19.1bn (3.8% of GDP) in 2011 up from $12.4bn (2.5% of GDP) in 2010, while net portfolio investment inflows moderated to around $16.2bn (3.1% of GDP) in 2011 from $25.5bn (5.4% of GDP) in 2010. Net other investment inflows (including cross-border lending) rose to $21.1bn
70
14 March 2012
(4.3% of GDP) in the 12 months to April from $9.4bn (2.0% of GDP) in 2010, but then saw a marked drop in H2 2011, coming in close to a net figure of zero for full-year 2011. In our view, the decline in cross-border lending towards the end of last year might have been due to the financing stress of the euro area parent banks that have subsidiaries in Poland. We believe that if financial stress in the euro area continues to abate, crossborder lending may rise again later this year, providing some support to the Polish zloty. Against this backdrop our end-2012 EURPLN forecast is 4.10. Inflation remains elevated but we expect it to decline towards the 2.5% yoy target by end-2012. CPI inflation reached a peak of 5.0% yoy in May 2011, and moderated to 4.3% yoy in February 2012, mainly due to base effects from a food price shock in 2010 and a VAT hike in January 2011. In the meantime, core inflation (excluding food, energy, alcohol, and tobacco prices) increased from a low of 0.7% yoy in November 2010 to 3.2% yoy in December 2011, driven by the recovery in domestic demand and the zloty weakness, but then moderated to 2.8% yoy in February. We believe that the Monetary Policy Council (MPC) will maintain its hawkish stance as long as CPI inflation is running significantly above its 2.5% yoy target, but it remains unlikely that the MPC would raise the policy rate against the lingering risk of a global economic slowdown. We project that as domestic demand growth moderates and the zloty exchange rate stabilizes, CPI inflation will moderate to close to the inflation target towards the end of 2012, and that the MPC will keep the policy rate on hold at 4.50% through end-2012. Subsequently, in our view, as domestic demand growth will start to accelerate in 2013, the MPC will probably raise the policy rate by 50bps to 5.00%. The government embarked on fiscal consolidation in 2011. In 2010, the broadly defined general government budget deficit was recorded around 7.8% of GDP, and the general government gross debt (under the ESA95 definition) was around 55.0% of GDP at the end of the year. We estimate that revenue-enhancing measures (including a VAT hike) improved the 2011 budget balance by about 1.0% of GDP, while spending cuts (including changes in entitlements to pension benefits) saved around 0.5% of GDP. Additionally, lower contributions to privately managed pension funds reduced expenditures by about 0.7% of GDP, on our estimates. In keeping with this, we believe that the government reached its deficit target of 5.6% of GDP in 2011 and that the general government gross debt was around 57.4% of GDP at end-2011, according to the EUs accounting rules. The general government budget deficit is likely to narrow further in 2012. We believe that a continuing public wage freeze, the expenditure rule which limits discretionary spending, a rise in employers' disability contribution, and new taxes on the commodities sector will reduce the general government budget deficit by around 2pps of GDP this year. We forecast that the general government budget deficit is likely to narrow to 3.7% of GDP in 2012 but question the attainability of this years general government budget deficit target of 2.9% of GDP. Prime Minister Tusk promised further structural reforms, pledging a gradual increase in the retirement age, as well as reductions in pension privileges for miners, priests and farmers. In our view, these measures should help to reduce the general government deficit to below 3.0% of GDP in 2013, and stabilize the general government gross debt at around 60% of GDP. Polands long-term foreign currency sovereign debt is currently rated A2 by Moodys and A- by Fitch and S&P, all with a stable outlook. We believe that the proven resilience of Polands economy and its favorable outlook argue for a more positive assessment of the countrys sovereign credit ratings, but an eventual upgrade remains contingent on further fiscal consolidation and on the implementation of the structural reforms.
71
14 March 2012
Poland's annualized quarter-on-quarter real GDP growth rate was stable in a range of 4%-5% throughout 2011, despite the weakening of growth in the euro area. Real GDP growth remained robust in Q4 2011 at 1.1% qoq, broadly unchanged from 1.0% qoq in Q3 2011. In our view, the economy has been operating over its capacity in 2011.
0 Net exports Inventories Investment spending Government spending Household spending GDP, % qoq Q4-09
Source: Eurostat
5.7
-2
-4 Q2-10
5.6 Q4-09
Source: GUS, Credit Suisse
Q4-10
Q2-11
Q4-11
Q4-11
Household spending growth will probably continue to slow in 2012, and the contribution of net exports to overall GDP growth will remain broadly flat. We believe that employment growth will moderate from 2.3% yoy in 2011 to around 1.0% yoy in 2012, while nominal wage growth will probably remain broadly steady between 4.0% and 5.0% yoy in 2012.
25 20 15
10 5 0 -5 Jan-10
Source: GUS, Credit Suisse
Jan-11
Jan-12
Jan-11
Jul-11
Stable sources of external financing (EU transfers and net FDI inflows) increased in 2011 and were almost adequate to finance the full current account deficit. Net other investment inflows (including crossborder lending) rose to $21.1bn (4.3% of GDP) in the 12 months to April from $9.4bn (2.0% of GDP) in 2010, but then saw a marked drop in H2 2011, coming in close to a net figure of zero for full-2011.
8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 Jan-10
Basic balance (FDI+EU+C/A+E/O) Net FDI and EU transfers Current account and net errors
40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 Jan-10
Net portfolio investment inflows Net other investment inflows Net direct investment inflows EU capital transfers
Jan-11
Jan-12
Jul-10
Jan-11
Jul-11
Jan-12
72
14 March 2012
CPI inflation reached a peak of 5.0% yoy in May 2011, and moderated to 4.3% yoy in February 2012, mainly due to base effects from a food price shock in 2010 and a VAT hike in January 2011. Core inflation moderated from 3.2% yoy in December to 2.8% yoy in February.
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Feb-11
Energy Food Alcohol and tobacco Core (CS measure) CPI, % yoy
7 6 5 4 3 2 1
CPI inflation NBP core inflation* CS measure of core inflation** Run-rate of CS core inflation***
May-11 Aug-11
Nov-11
Feb-12
0 Feb-11
May-11
Aug-11
Nov-11
Feb-12
Source: *excluding food, and energy prices; **excluding food, energy, alcohol and tobacco; ***calculated as the annualized threemonth moving average of the de-seasonalized month-on-month core inflation. Source: Eurostat, GUS, Credit Suisse
24
2 1
65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 2001
22
0 -1
20
-2 -3
-4 -5 -6 Jan-12
16 Jan-10
2004
2007
2010
2013F
73
14 March 2012
(1) Real effective exchange rate (CPI-deflated), increase indicates appreciation. (2) ESA95 budget balances represent the consolidated fiscal balance of the general government on an accrual basis while the central government balance has a narrower definition and reported on a cash basis. (3) Scheduled amortizations of medium- and long-term external debt of both the public and private sector. Sources: GUS, Ministry of Finance, National Bank of Poland, IMF, JEDH, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, Haver Analyitcs, Credit Suisse
74
14 March 2012
Vladimir Putins first-round victory in the presidential election on 4 March points to an early easing of political uncertainty, but investor confidence would be supported only if reforms are resumed. We believe that Putins outright victory allows him to claim a strong mandate from the electorate, but investors will be looking for evidence that he is prepared to pursue proactive reforms during his third term in office. The unexpectedly strong challenge by Mikhail Prokhorov, a prominent businessman and a political novice, demonstrates the electorates growing appetite for pro-market policies and political liberalization. Dmitry Medvedev still looks set to become the new prime minister (in May), but we expect investors to focus more on actual implementation of the declared policy measures than on the composition of the new government. Putins campaign agenda contained a broad range of policy proposals that may help Russia to become a more attractive destination for domestic and foreign capital. Among these goals, progress on tackling corruption and enhancing governance would, in the view of many observers including ourselves, represent the key factor for improving the countrys investment climate. Other important issues for the new government should include reform of the political system (initiated in the wake of largescale protests after the December Duma elections), a transparent privatization process, pension reform (including increases in minimum pension age), streamlining taxation of the energy sector, and a review of the social spending commitments. The high level of Russias non-oil budget deficit (over 10% of GDP) means the government needs to consider very carefully any such fresh commitments, including those Putin made during his campaign (of about 1.2%-1.3% of GDP annually during his six-year term). Full-year real GDP growth for 2011 was 4.3%, above our own and market projections of 4.1% and 4.0%, respectively. The stronger-than-expected growth was mainly attributed to a further pick-up in output in Q4, supported by robust fixed capital investment growth (of 8.1% yoy in Q4 after 7.5% yoy in Q3). On our estimates, real GDP grew 4.8% yoy in Q4, on par with the previous quarter. We estimate that, in seasonally adjusted terms, real GDP was up 1.3% qoq in Q4, after 1.4% qoq in Q3 and 0.8% qoq in Q2. However, the full-year GDP growth decomposition does not appear particularly encouraging, with fixed investment growth at 6.0% yoy (compared to double-digit growth prior to the 2008 crisis), resulting in a lower investment ratio (21.0% of GDP in 2011). Despite higher oil prices, we expect real GDP growth to decelerate in 2012 to 3.8% due to subdued external demand, a delayed start to the annual investment cycle because of the elections, and a smaller harvest due to less favorable weather conditions this year. The latest domestic demand indicators and early official estimates point to only modest growth in Q1 2012. Fixed capital investment growth accelerated to 15.6% yoy in January from 8.9% yoy in December. However, on our estimates, in seasonally adjusted (sa) terms, fixed investment growth was 0.2% mom, after 0.9% mom in December. Retail sales growth moderated in January to 6.8% yoy from 9.5% yoy in December, which was below expectations. Industrial output growth picked up in January to 0.4% mom sa from 0.1% mom sa previously; however, manufacturing PMI remains subdued, having stayed at a four-month trough of 50.7 in February. The government estimates that real GDP fell 0.1% mom sa in January; we now project only a modest increase in economic activity in Q1 2012. Following the broadly market-friendly outcome of the presidential elections, we expect the economic recovery to strengthen, led by higher fixed investment and private consumption growth (on the back of a stronger rouble and higher budget spending growth over the past three months). Headline inflation hit a fresh all-time low in February but is expected to rebound in H2 2012, following the delayed increase in utility tariffs in July. CPI inflation fell further in February to 3.7% yoy after 4.2% yoy in January (and 6.1% yoy in December 2011), on the back of a stronger rouble and the impact of the delay in the annual tariff increases. Officially measured core inflation continued to ease to 5.7% yoy from 6.0% yoy in January and a recent peak of 8.4% yoy in July 2011. Our own measure of core
75
14 March 2012
inflation (excluding food, alcohol, tobacco, gasoline, and utilities) was down to 5.9% yoy from 6.1% yoy in January. The impact of high inflation last year on core inflation continues to lose momentum: the core inflation run rate (annualized three-month moving averages of the seasonally adjusted series) registered a further drop to 4.6% in February from 5.2% in January(and the recent peak of 7.5% in July). Ahead of the anticipated increases in administered and fuel prices, the central bank (CBR) is unlikely to ease policy in the coming months. We think the CBR may adopt a tightening bias even ahead of the anticipated increase in headline inflation, once the election-related commitments for higher social spending are reflected in the governments spending plans. Higher petrol prices (effectively frozen since the beginning of the year) will represent an additional risk factor. For now, we expect the impact of the stronger rouble to help contain inflationary pressures, allowing the central bank to keep headline inflation near its target for end-2012 of 6%. However, this level may be exceeded in early 2013 due to the impact of higher spending and a likely weakening of the exchange rate (in response to a lower current account surplus). We have revised upward our end-year CPI inflation forecast to 6.1% yoy in 2012 (from 5.4% yoy previously) and to 5.8% yoy for 2013 (from 4.9% yoy previously). The rouble has gained 7.6% against the basket so far this year, supported by higher oil prices and the improvement in global risk appetite. The strong current account inflows in the first two months of the year (that we estimate at some $23bn) were accompanied by continuing large net private capital outflows of about $20bn, attributed mainly to political uncertainty ahead of the presidential elections. The CBR was a net buyer of foreign currency, having purchased roughly $2.6bn in the first two months of 2012. Assuming global sentiment improves and domestic political tensions ease, the rouble would appreciate further, helped by higher oil prices and tighter liquidity conditions. We expect the rouble to surpass the 33.0 level in basket terms as early as this month and to appreciate towards the stronger edge of the CBRs intervention band (RUB 32.2). In Q4 2012, we expect a narrower current account surplus, higher capital outflows, and rising inflation to put downward pressure on the exchange rate. Net private capital outflows are set to ease following the orderly outcome of the presidential election and improved global markets sentiment. Net outflows in 2011 were $84.2bn (4.5% of GDP), after $33.6bn (2.3% of GDP) in 2010. The main drivers of outflows have been the uncertain global environment, political tensions, and lower external debt rollover ratios (attributed in part to increased repatriation of capital by European banks). According to the CBR, net private capital outflow totaled $11bn in January. On our estimates, outflows declined only marginally in February to about $9bn. In our view, the relatively high net private capital outflows in early 2012 should be mainly attributed to a seasonal increase in the current account surplus, helped by higher oil prices. Should domestic political tensions continue to ease post-election, the direction of capital flows could reverse as early as May, in our view. The federal budget was in deficit in the first two months of 2012 (RUB250bn or 3.0% of GDP), for the first time in more than ten years, according to preliminary estimates by the Finance Ministry. On the 12-month rolling basis, the surplus of the federal budget fell to 0.2% of GDP in February from 0.5% in January and 0.8% in December 2011. The recent deterioration in the fiscal position was mainly on the expenditure side. The most plausible explanation for the abrupt increase in expenditures, in our view, was that expenditure was front loaded ahead of the presidential elections on 4 March, with control over spending likely to be regained soon. We expect the 2012 federal budget to be in a deficit of 0.1% of GDP, assuming an average oil price (Urals) at $119/bbl and extra expenditures this year of 0.5% of GDP. The brunt of the extra spending (and of overall impact on the budget) will take place at the regional government level.
76
14 March 2012
Full-year real GDP growth was 4.3% in 2011, implying that real GDP rose 4.8% yoy in Q4, on our calculations, on par with Q3. We estimate that real GDP growth in seasonally adjusted terms was 1.3% qoq in Q4, after 1.4% qoq in Q3 and 0.8% qoq in Q2. We expect the negative output gap (0.9% currently, on our estimates) to close by the end of this year.
10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 Mar-05 Agriculture & fishing Retail trade Industrial production Transport & telecoms Construction Services and other sectors Real GDP Mar-07 Mar-09 Mar-11
10
9.5
5 0 -5 -10 -15
Real GDP growth is likely to ease to 0.6% qoq sa in Q1 due to only modest growth in investment and retail sales in early 2012. Industrial output growth in January picked up to 0.4% mom sa, after 0.1% mom sa in December. However, manufacturing PMI remained subdued, having slowed to a four-month trough.
30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 Sep-06 Retail sales Real wages Fixed investment Jan-08 May-09 Sep-10
63 58 53 48 43 38 33 28 Oct-08
15 10 5 0 -5 New orders PMI -10 Employment IP Index (right scale) -15 -20 Feb-12
Aug-09
Jun-10
Apr-11
18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Oct-08 Aug-09
18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2
20 16 12 8 4 0 Feb-12
Jun-10
Apr-11
0 Feb-12
Note: Official core CPI is net of fruit and vegetables, includes most other food items. CS core CPI is net of all food and energy items. Source: Rosstat, Credit Suisse
77
14 March 2012
The pace of monetary growth aggregates remained subdued in early 2012. We now expect headline inflation to pick up to 6.1% yoy by end2012 on the back of higher services tariffs and deferred increases in petrol prices. In order to contain headline inflation to its 6% target for end-2012, we now expect the central bank to tighten policy at some point in H2 2012.
FX reserves (US$ bn, right scale) 600 M2 (left scale) 550 M0 (left scale)
16 14 12 10 8
Fixed tom-next deposit rate 3-month NDF 1-day direct repo CPI inflation (% yoy) Refinancing rate Overnight fixed deposit rate
16 14 12 10 8 6 4
Jul-08
Sep-09 Nov-10
Jan-10
Oct-10
Jun-11
2 Mar-12
The rouble remains well supported by export flows and healthy demand from nonresident portfolio investors. We estimate the rouble is now trading around the RUB 33.7 threshold level against the basket, where the central bank has increased its daily intervention volumes from approximately $120mn to about $250mn. Should net private capital outflows ease, we may see further rouble appreciation towards RUB32.2 against the basket.
38 37 36 35 34 33 Dec-10
39.2 38.2 37.2 36.2 35.2 34.2 33.2 32.2 31.2 Oct-10 Free-float mini-band Basket
39.2 38.2 37.2 36.2 35.2 34.2 33.2 32.2 31.2 Mar-11 Aug-11 Feb-12
May-11
Oct-11
130 Mar-12
Note: The $0.55/0.45 basket is in effect since 8 February 2007. Source: the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, Credit Suisse.
Exchange rate volatility has curbed imports growth in Q4 after a period of extremely strong growth in Q2 and early Q3. Growth in exports values held steady, generating trade surpluses of about $18bn$19bn per month. The 12month rolling federal budget surplus narrowed in February to 0.2% of GDP from 0.8% of GDP in December, following a spike in spending ahead of the elections. Assuming an average oil price (Urals) at $119/bbl, the federal budget should stay roughly balanced this year.
Emerging Markets Quarterly
Balance (12m rolling, left scale) 100 Imports, % yoy, 3mma 85 Exports, % yoy, 3mma 70 55 40 25 10 -5 -20 -35 Nov-09 Dec-10 -50 Jan-12
12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 Oct-06 Overall balance (left scale) Total revenue Non-interest expenditure Feb-08 Jun-09 Oct-10
28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 Feb-12
October 2010 data are Economy Ministry estimates. Source: Central Bank, Credit Suisse
78
14 March 2012
(1) The basket comprises $0.55 and 0.45. Our forecasts for the USDRUB exchange rate are derived from our basket exchange rate forecasts and Credit Suisse's EURUSD forecasts. (2) Real effective exchange rate (deflator: CPI), increase indicates appreciation. (3) Net of bank recapitalization costs. (4) Net of official fiscal reserves (Stabilization Fund assets through 2007, thereafter the sum of the Reserve Fund and the National Welfare Fund). (5) Long- and medium-term amortization of the private and public sectors. (6) Liabilities of the central and regional governments and the central bank. Source: Rosstat, Central Bank of Russia, Finance Ministry of the Russian Federation, Credit Suisse
79
14 March 2012
Macroeconomic developments in South Africa in recent months have been more positive than what was generally feared at the time of our last Emerging Markets Quarterly (7 December 2011), in our view. First, real GDP growth in Q4 recorded a broad-based acceleration to a higher-than-expected 3.2% qoq annualized, and activity in January and February was on balance more resilient than expected, in our view. Second, consumer price inflation increased to 6.3% yoy in January, but the continued breach of the inflation target (3%-6%) looks likely to be smaller and less extended than feared late last year, in our view. Third, as global risk appetite has recovered so have international portfolio inflows to South Africa. Finally, the rand has recovered more quickly and more strongly than expected, up 7% since the beginning of the year, in nominal trade-weighted terms. There are a number of reasons, both external and domestic, to be more optimistic about the prospects for South African economic growth, inflation, capital inflows and the rand. First, our global economists expect a sequential improvement in quarterly global real GDP growth and monthly industrial production throughout 2012. According to their estimates, quarter-on-quarter annualized real GDP growth bottomed in Q4 2011 and should accelerate throughout 2012. Similarly, global industrial production growth bottomed in late 2011, accelerated in the current quarter, and is expected to maintain a relatively solid rate of 5.2% on a 3m/3m annualized basis throughout the rest of 2012. Second, our commodity research analysts forecast that prices for most industrial and precious metals will increase throughout the year, as the global economy proves to be more resilient to the European debt crisis than was feared late last year. Our commodity research analysts do not think that there has been a structural decline in investor interest in commodities (see The Demise of Commodities as an Asset Class Much Exaggerated, 5 March 2012). All of this bodes well for South Africas mining production volumes (see Better prospects for mining output in 2012, 30 January 2012) and for capital inflows related to the sector. On 1 March 2012, our foreign currency strategists revised their forecast for EURUSD to 1.29 on a three-month horizon and 1.28 on a 12-month horizon, in response to improved global risk appetite. They also revised stronger the forecasts for emerging market currencies, including USDZAR, which is expected to be at 7.80 on a three-month horizon and 7.50 on a 12-month horizon. South African monetary policy remains accommodative, in our opinion. We expect that the policy rate of 5.5% will remain unchanged until H2 2013, implying negative real short-term interest rates for most of the current year. We think that the Reserve Bank could lower its forecasts for headline consumer price inflation at the next MPC meeting on 27-29 March. Nevertheless, we expect that it will maintain its preference for a stable interest rate environment, as economic growth surprises on the upside, credit growth accelerates further, the growth rate of unit labor costs increases, and core inflation moves higher, in our view. Fiscal policy is set to be less stimulatory, but the prospects for the broader public sectors infrastructure program have improved. The consolidated government budget deficits have been revised lower for the next three fiscal years. Expenditure as a percentage of GDP was revised marginally lower in the Budget Review on 22 February but remains at historical highs, above 31% over the next three fiscal years, according to the National Treasurys estimates. The tax burden is budgeted to increase to 27.4% of GDP in FY2012/13 from a previous estimate of 27%. The ratio moves higher in FY2013/14 and FY2014/15. We think that expenditure plans for the next three years are designed with too little margin for error. In our opinion, the risk is that expenditure turns out to be higher than budgeted, either in response to political pressures or in reaction to the fiscal space that upside surprises in economic growth and tax collection could provide.
80
14 March 2012
There appears to be renewed vigor in the public sectors infrastructure program. Infrastructure expenditure is budgeted to increase by 5.3% to ZAR845bn over the next three years. The program will be monitored by a newly formed presidential infrastructure coordinating committee. The public sector accounts for 36% of total fixed investment in the economy, therefore an implementation of the program in line with what has been budgeted would support the construction sector and the recovery in fixed investment more generally, in our view (see Construction awaits vigor in infrastructure investment, 23 February 2012). Against this backdrop, our core macroeconomic forecasts are as follows. First, we maintain our above-consensus forecast for real GDP growth for 2012 and 2013 at 3.3% and 4.0%, respectively. We expect that real household consumption expenditure will grow at a more moderate pace of 3.4% in 2012 compared to an estimated 4.9% in 2011. We now expect fixed investment to pick up some of the slack with estimated growth at 4.4% in 2012 compared to an estimated 4.2% in 2011. This would help lift South Africas fixed investment ratio to an estimated 20.2% of GDP. We expect that government consumption growth will slow to 3.4% in 2012 from an estimated 4.3% in 2011. In summary, we estimate that the growth rate of gross domestic expenditure will slow to 3.7% in 2011 compared an estimated 4.3% in 2011. Consequently, the growth rate of import volumes will also decelerate based on our estimates. Second, despite weaker growth in imports we expect that the current account deficit will widen marginally. An expected increase in income and service payments will likely push the current account deficit to 4.0% of GDP in 2012 from an estimated 3.6% in 2011. According to our estimates, South Africas total balance of payments funding needs increase to $44.6bn in 2012 from an estimated $38.5bn in 2011. Aside from the higher current account deficit, a large increase in private sector debt amortization in 2012 pushes up the countrys external financing needs, which is expected to be equivalent to 10.8% of GDP. Third, we revise higher our estimates for foreign direct investment inflows and portfolio inflows, in line with our more constructive view on global growth, commodity prices and general risk appetite. We pencil in $3.1bn of foreign direct investment inflows for 2012 and $6.3bn of international portfolio inflows. We assume short-term financing of $20.6bn, similar to the amount borrowed in 2011. We also assume that other investment inflows and resident repatriations will again be high, similar to what was experienced in 2011. Lastly, we expect that the Reserve Bank will react to appreciation pressure on the rand by building foreign exchange reserves. We estimate that the real effective rand exchange rate will have appreciated by 8% by the end of 2012 compared to the depreciation of 14% in 2011. Finally, we lower our estimates marginally for inflation as a result of our stronger forecast for the rand. The recent appreciation in the rand looks likely to temper the rise in inflation expected in the months ahead, in our view. Furthermore, the announcement that electricity tariffs will only be raised by 16% this year compared to a previously announced 25.9%, also leads us to revise lower our year-end forecast for consumer price inflation to 5.5% from 5.7%. Our forecast for inflation was not cut more aggressively because we have concerns about the renewed increase in domestic maize prices, the growth rate of unit labor costs and rising core inflation. Reserve Bank Governor Marcus has said that the renewed increase in unit labor costs poses upside risk to the inflation outlook. The growth rate of nominal unit labor costs accelerated to 8.3% in Q3 2011, having fallen to 5.2% in mid-2011 from 10.5% in early 2010. Trade unions look likely to take advantage of the ruling ANCs policy and elective conferences this year (in June and December, respectively) to push for higher wage adjustments and increased regulation of the labor market. We continue to think that monetary and fiscal policies will remain orthodox, despite the likely increased political rhetoric this year.
Emerging Markets Quarterly
81
14 March 2012
4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 Feb-10 Monthly Rolling 12-month sum (right) Aug-10 Feb-11 Aug-11 Feb-12
16 12 8 4 0 -4 -8 -12 -16
We expect that mining volumes will rebound this year, following their collapse in 2011. A sequential improvement in external demand, higher international commodity prices and higher fixed investment in the sector should all boost production volumes.
7 5 3 1 -1 -3 -5 -7
105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60
12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12
05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Source: Statistics South Africa, Credit Suisse
05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Source: Statistics South Africa, Credit Suisse
14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 91 94 97 00 03 06 09 12
82
14 March 2012
There are positive indications that the public sectors infrastructure program could be implemented with greater vigor over the next 18 months. This would help support the recovery in fixed investment, which over the past seven quarters has been led by the private sectors investment in machinery and equipment, whilst investment in constructionrelated assets has lagged.
25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 Private business Public corporations Government Total fixed investment (% qoq) 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
Source: Reserve Bank, Credit Suisse
60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15
Source: Reserve Bank, Credit Suisse
85 80
6 4 2
75 70 65
Transfers balance Income balance Services balance Trade balance Current account
0 -2 -4 -6
60 Mar-10
-8
Sep-10 Mar-11 Sep-11 Mar-12
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
Source: Reserve Bank, Credit Suisse
16
12 9 6
The inflation outlook has improved as a result of the stronger-than-expected appreciation in the rand, but other risks remain for inflation, including an acceleration in the growth rate of unit labor costs.
83
14 March 2012
2006 5.6 8.3 12.1 17.8 261.2 48.6 5,376 22.1 4.7 3.1 13.8 6.97 6.77 -9.4 9.00 0.7 3.5 25.7 30.1 26.0 65.5 20.1 87.5 24.0 81.2 25.8 30.0 32.5 15.9 23.2 -13.9 -5.3 -6.6 2.0 59.4 25.5 33.9 22.7 75.8 25.6 23.0 23.1
2007 5.5 5.5 14.0 19.2 285.8 49.0 5,837 21.0 7.4 6.0 7.4 6.81 7.05 0.1 11.00 0.9 3.4 26.1 27.6 23.0 69.3 20.7 92.3 20.2 86.5 21.5 31.5 34.2 14.8 15.4 -19.9 -7.0 2.7 1.8 75.3 24.4 51.0 26.4 83.7 33.0 31.3 29.6
2008 3.6 2.2 13.3 21.0 274.2 48.6 5,636 21.9 9.0 9.9 12.2 9.53 8.25 -16.5 11.50 -1.1 1.3 30.8 27.2 22.8 69.0 11.8 95.5 16.1 87.6 13.6 35.8 38.8 9.1 8.9 -19.6 -7.2 12.2 2.0 72.9 22.3 50.6 26.6 74.3 34.1 33.5 30.6
2009 -1.5 -1.6 -3.2 20.7 284.5 49.3 5,768 24.2 6.3 7.1 15.5 7.38 8.43 22.5 7.00 -6.5 -4.2 33.7 33.0 27.6 66.2 1.7 91.8 1.9 82.5 -0.1 27.4 28.3 -20.5 -24.4 -11.5 -4.0 4.2 2.1 78.6 27.9 50.7 27.6 100.8 39.7 39.0 35.3
2010 2.9 3.7 -1.6 19.8 364.3 50.0 7,287 24.0 3.5 4.3 10.1 6.63 7.31 10.0 5.50 -4.2 -1.8 31.7 36.0 29.7 63.0 5.6 87.9 6.2 78.4 5.5 26.9 27.5 25.6 24.7 -10.3 -2.8 1.3 1.8 99.0 43.4 55.7 27.2 101.1 43.8 43.4 38.2
2011E 3.1 4.9 4.2 20.0 397.2 50.6 7,851 23.9 6.1 5.0 7.5 8.09 7.25 -13.8 5.50 -4.8 -2.2 32.5 39.4 33.0 62.4 7.2 87.3 7.5 76.9 6.1 29.4 30.4 19.3 20.2 -14.3 -3.6 3.4 2.3 111.0 53.1 57.9 27.9 95.0 48.9 47.9 42.6
2012F 3.3 3.4 4.4 20.2 411.2 51.1 8,048 23.0 5.5 6.0 8.0 7.50 7.67 8.3 5.50 -4.6 -1.9 33.4 40.8 35.8 62.2 9.1 88.4 10.8 77.8 10.7 32.8 32.2 15.7 9.8 -16.6 -4.0 3.1 7.3 118.5 57.6 60.9 28.8 87.7 53.9 51.6 47.0
2013F 4.0 4.2 4.8 20.4 450.8 51.6 8,734 22.5 5.5 5.3 8.0 7.80 7.66 -1.5 6.50 -4.0 -1.2 32.0 41.9 37.6 63.5 11.8 90.2 11.8 79.4 11.8 35.6 34.7 18.8 18.1 -19.1 -4.2 3.7 4.4 126.9 63.1 63.9 28.2 79.1 54.9 52.6 47.8
5.3 6.1 11.0 16.8 246.9 48.2 5,125 23.5 2.0 2.0 4.3 6.32 6.36 0.0 7.00 -0.3 2.8 25.8 32.8 29.1 61.3 17.7 79.4 16.6 72.6 19.5 27.4 27.9 16.6 17.3 -8.6 -3.5 5.7 2.6 48.6 23.8 24.8 19.7 71.9 20.7 17.2 18.6
General government fiscal balance (% of GDP) General government primary balance (% of GDP) General government expenditure (% of GDP) Gross general government debt (% of GDP, end-year) Net general government debt (% of GDP, year-end) Money supply and credit Broad money supply (M2, % of GDP) Broad money supply (M2, % year-on-year change) Domestic credit (% of GDP) Domestic credit (% year-on-year) Domestic credit to private sector (% of GDP) Domestic credit to private sector (% year-on-year) Balance of payments Exports (goods and non-factor services, % of GDP) Imports (goods and non-factor services, % of GDP) Exports (goods and non-factor services, % change in $ value) Imports (goods and non-factor services, % change in $ value) Current account balance ($bn) Current account (% of GDP) Net FDI ($bn) Scheduled debt amortization ($bn)(4) Foreign debt and reserves Foreign debt ($bn)(5) Public ($bn) Private ($bn) Foreign debt (% of GDP, end-year) Foreign debt (% of exports of goods and services) Central bank gross FX reserves, including forward FX transactions ($bn) Central bank net FX reserves ($bn) Central bank gross non-gold FX reserves ($bn)
(1) Based on remuneration per worker, index 2000=100. (2) Real effective exchange rate, increase indicates appreciation. (3) Data for fiscal years starting 1 April. Selected data refer to the governments consolidated fiscal balances from 2009. (4) Of medium- and long-term debt only. (5) Including rand-denominated debt held by non-residents. Source: South African Reserve Bank, Statistics South Africa, National Treasury, Credit Suisse
84
14 March 2012
Economic activity is moderating after a slight pick-up in Q4 2011, on our estimates. (GDP data for Q4 2011 will be released on 2 April.) Industrial output was up 3.1% qoq in Q4 2011 on a seasonally and workday adjusted (swda) basis, accelerating sharply from 0.9% qoq swda in Q3 2011. Since early 2012, however, signs of moderation have emerged in both demand- and supply-side indicators, which were driven by various factors, in our view, including the increase in banks lending rates (in response to tighter lira liquidity since late October) and supply-chain disruptions caused by adverse weather conditions. The run-rate of consumer loan growth (the annualized four-week moving average of the week-on-week growth rate) was nil at end-January compared to about 15.0% at end-December. Meanwhile, industrial output was down 1.9% mom swda in January, the manufacturing sectors capacity utilization rate declined to 75.8% in February from 76.6% in December, and the manufacturing PMI dipped below 50 in February for the first time since April 2009. However, this moderation is likely to be temporary, in our view. Credit growth has started to pick up since late January as the central bank encouraged by the stronger lira and global risk appetite has been easing lira liquidity. Banks lending rates have been declining since late January (mortgage rates by about 110bps to 13.45%), and the run-rate of consumer loan growth increased to about 8.0% in early March. The central banks monthly business survey also showed a surge in three-month-ahead orders in February. In view of the central banks growth-supportive policy stance (which became even more clear, in our view, in the context of the 31 January inflation report) and recent signs of a pick-up in economic activity compared to early 2012, we revised higher our 2012 real GDP growth forecast to 4.2% from 2.1% previously. (We also revised our 2011 real GDP growth forecast to 8.8% from 7.5%.) The demand side of the economy is continuing to rebalance away from domestic demand, but the pace of this rebalancing is slowing. The available volume data for goods exports and imports suggest that the rebalancing (which started in Q2 2011) has continued through Q4 2011, albeit at a slower rate. Similarly, the current account deficit (in seasonally adjusted dollar terms) declined on average to $5.8bn in Q4 2011 from $6.2bn in Q3 2011and $7.0bn in Q2 2011, on our estimates. The seasonally adjusted current account deficit was broadly unchanged in January compared to the Q4 2011 average, but this was partly due to high oil prices. The run-rate of the current account deficit (currently at about $70bn) might dip below our 2012 current account deficit forecast of $61.4bn (7.7% of GDP) in February or March, but the central banks growth-supportive policies, its lira-based disinflation strategy and high oil prices imply that any near-term improvement in the current account deficit would be temporary. (Our average global oil price assumption for 2012 is $120/bbl and an increase of $10/bbl adds about $5bn to Turkeys full-year current account deficit, all else being equal.) We believe the large (albeit narrowing) current account deficit will keep the lira vulnerable to swings in global risk sentiment and the exchange-ratedependent monetary policy outlook highly uncertain. Additionally, the longer it takes for the external imbalances to improve, the higher the pressure on Turkeys credit ratings and outlook will be, in our view. The inflation outlook remains contingent on the exchange rate as ever. Headline inflation increased to 10.4% yoy in February 2012 from 6.2% yoy in September 2011, as a result of administered price/tax hikes, unfavorable base effects and the pass-through from the weak lira. The run-rate of core inflation (annualized three-month moving average of the central banks core inflation indicator I) remained within 8.0%-8.5% after September but declined modestly to 7.6% in February on account of the liras recent strength. In the absence of another exchange rate shock, we expect the run-rate of core inflation to continue to slow but forecast that headline inflation will hover around 10.0% through May (and possibly through July) and fall gradually to 6.5% by end-2012. Since another exchange rate shock would push headline inflation firmly into double-digit territory, the MPC will continue to monitor the exchange rate as a key (but not the only) input into its policy decisions. We do not expect the MPC to respond to the first-round impact of higher global oil prices.
85
14 March 2012
Since August 2011, the central bank has tried to contain the impact on the lira of moderating cross-border capital inflows with sizable FX sales. Twelve-month rolling net other investments (which primarily comprise cross-border loans and the repatriation of residents off-shore deposits, and constitute the main source of financing for the current account deficit) declined to $24.5bn in January 2012 from $39.5bn in August 2011. Concurrently, the central banks FX reserves declined by $16.3bn, with declines of $7.5bn recorded in August-October and $8.1bn in December-January. These FX sales, however, had to be combined with sharply higher short-term interest rates (and stronger global risk appetite) in order for the depreciation pressure on the lira to be contained. The MPCs focus on the exchange rate since August 2011 combined with its reluctance for an outright repo rate hike led to frequent changes in the monetary policy framework. The central bank relied solely on FX sales in August-October to contain the depreciation pressure on the lira, but this proved inadequate. The depreciation in the liras nominal basket exchange rate (BASKTRY) to as weak as 2.22 on 19 October triggered a sharp 350bps hike in the central banks overnight lending rate (i.e., the upper end of the short-term interest rate corridor) to 12.50%. While the central bank continued to provide one-week lira funding at the unchanged policy rate of 5.75%, the interbank overnight rate moved higher by about 460bps to 10.78% on average (between 20 October and 28 December). Nevertheless, the increase in the effective yield support for the lira was not adequate on its own either to stabilize the lira (as the central bank limited its FX sales in November). As BASKTRY weakened to 2.22 again in late December, the central bank started to implement a new and even more complicated monetary policy framework from 29 December, combining high short-term interest rates and aggressive FX sales through 9 January which succeeded in reversing the depreciation pressure on the lira (albeit with the help of improving global risk appetite). The new monetary policy framework is primarily specified with respect to global risk appetite, in our view, continuing to damage the credibility of the inflation targeting regime. Under the new framework that has been in effect since 29 December, the central bank provides one-week lira funding at the policy rate (the one-week repo rate which still stands at 5.75%) on normal days and at the auction-clearing rate on exceptional days. The central banks definition of normal and exceptional days is not clear, but the eight exceptional trading days between 29 December and 9 January were characterized by low global risk appetite and limited capital inflows into Turkey. On those exceptional days, the central bank provided one-week funding at an average interest rate of 11.73% (rather than at 5.75%) and sold FX aggressively both through direct interventions and regular daily FX auctions. Since 10 January, stronger global risk appetite has allowed all trading days to be classified as normal days and the central bank has been providing one-week funding at the policy rate of 5.75%. The central bank has also been providing one-month lira funding (at the auction-clearing rate) since late December, keeping the average cost of lira funding above the policy rate of 5.75%, albeit on a declining path. The monetary policy outlook remains contingent on BASKTRY and credit growth, but is biased for further easing, in our view. Since November, the MPC has been underscoring the importance of credit growth and inflation expectations (i.e., BASKTRY, in our reading) in its policy decisions. In its 31 January inflation report, the central bank revised higher its end-2012 inflation forecast to 6.5% under the baseline assumptions for BASKTRY of about 2.05 and credit growth of 15.0%. (In the same report, the central bank pushed the timing for the attainability of the 5% inflation target to mid-2013 in view of the potential output costs that would be associated with further monetary policy tightening, underscoring real GDP growth as a priority.) As BASKTRY traded around 2.02 and the run-rate of credit growth was only 1.5% for consumer loans ahead of its February meeting, the MPC eased monetary policy on 21 February by lowering the central banks overnight lending rate by to 11.50% and adopted a cautious stance for the coming period. Our best guess regarding this cautious stance is that the MPC will ease monetary policy (by lowering the central banks overnight lending rate) as long as the two key variables BASKTRY and the credit growth rate provide the room for it.
86
14 March 2012
Available indicators suggest that real GDP growth might have accelerated modestly in Q4 2011. Industrial output growth in Q4 2011 was recorded as 3.1% qoq in seasonally and workdayadjusted terms, up sharply from 0.9% qoq in Q3 2011. Manufacturing activity indicators from early 2012, however, are showing signs of moderation, which might have been due to supplychain disruptions caused by adverse weather conditions.
Q4-07
Q4-09
Q4-11
50 Feb-12
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 6-Jul % annualized, 4-week moving average % annualized, 13-week moving average
24-Sep
13-Dec
2-Mar
Mar-11
Sep-11
Mar-12
22.0 20.0
60
Cash
40
12.0
-40
Aug-11
Nov-11
Feb-12
-60 Feb-10
Aug-10
Feb-11
Aug-11
Feb-12
* Based on the central banks monthly business survey and calculated as the difference between the share of companies that see an increase in their orders and those that see a decline. Source: Central Bank, Credit Suisse
87
14 March 2012
200.0
180.0
8.0
120.0 Q4-09
Q2-10
Q4-10
Q2-11
Q4-11
0.0 Jan-09
Jan-10
Jan-11
Jan-12
The large (albeit narrowing) current account deficit will keep the lira vulnerable to swings in global risk sentiment, and the exchange-rate-dependent monetary policy outlook highly uncertain, in our view. The central banks complicated monetary policy framework allows for lira liquidity to be eased if the exchange rate remains well-behaved.
1.85
7.00
6.00 13-Mar 8-Mar 3-Mar 27-Feb 22-Feb 17-Feb 12-Feb 7-Feb 2-Feb 28-Jan 23-Jan 18-Jan 13-Jan 8-Jan 3-Jan 29-Dec
Jul-11
Nov-11
Mar-12
12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 Feb-11
14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 Feb-09
Aug-11
Feb-12
Feb-10
Feb-11
Feb-12
Note: The energy component of CPI is not released officially. We simulate it using the officially released core indicator excluding energy. Source: Statistics Office, Credit Suisse
*Core index I excludes food, energy, tobacco products, alcoholic beverages and gold from the CPI basket. **Calculated as the annualized three-month moving average of the month-on-month changes in the seasonally adjusted core index I. Source: Statistics Office, Credit Suisse
88
14 March 2012
(1) For the private manufacturing sector for 2004 and 2005, for the overall manufacturing sector for 2006 and 2007, and the overall hourly earnings index thereafter. (2) The basket exchange rate is the average of USDTRY and EURTRY exchange rates. Our forecasts for USDTRY are derived from our basket exchange rate forecasts and Credit Suisse's EURUSD forecasts. (3) Real effective exchange rate, increase indicates appreciation. (4) The monetary policy committee changed the definition of the policy rate on 18 May 2010 to the one-week repo rate from central banks overnight borrowing rate previously. (5) The definition of the consolidated government comprises the central government, extra-budgetary funds, state-owned enterprises, social security institutions and the Unemployment Insurance Fund. The data for government spending and gross debt are for the central government. (6) Gross general government debt minus the central bank's net assets, public sector's deposits/securities and the assets of the Unemployment Insurance Fund. (7) Central banks old definition of M2 is used for both 2004 and 2005 due to lack of data on the new definition. (8) Of medium- and long-term debt, including repayments to the IMF. Source: Statistics Office, Central Bank, Treasury, IMF, Credit Suisse
89
14 March 2012
Ukraines ability to successfully cope with its large financing needs over the next couple of years seems in doubt. This is due primarily to the increasing focus of the countrys political leaders on the forthcoming parliamentary elections scheduled for October 2012. This overriding need to secure public support ahead of the elections has prevented the government from meeting its earlier commitment to the IMF on raising gas tariffs and has likely contributed to the decision by the president to increase social spending by some 1.2pps of GDP this year, over and above the approved budget targets. With scope for cooperation with the IMF and other multilateral lenders prior to the elections all but closed, Ukraine is now facing the need to repay some $3.2bn to IFIs (after the $0.6bn paid last month) and a further $2.5bn to private sector creditors this year, without recourse to fresh IMF or World Bank financing or ready access to capital markets. In the meantime, Ukraines negotiations with Russia on a potentially large discount off the natural gas price, in return for a stake in its pipeline network, have been hampered by election-related political sensitivities in both countries this year. After the strong growth in 2011 (5.2%, primarily due to a sharp rebound in agriculture on the back of a record-high harvest), real GDP is unlikely to expand by more than 3% this year, on our estimates. The beginning of the year was characterized by exceptionally harsh weather conditions throughout the country, boosting demand for the output of the utilities sector (to 3.4% yoy in January, reversing the decline in late 2011), but keeping growth in metals output below last years level (by 1.6% yoy). The severe weather in February forced several manufacturing plants to suspend production and many farmers in the south to re-plant their wheat crops. From the demand side, growth has been consumption-led most recently, while the performance of fixed investment has been uneven. GDP growth in January was estimated by the central bank at just 2% yoy, putting in further doubt the attainability of the budgeted growth assumption for this year, of 3.9%. Inflation fell to a nine-year low of 3.0% yoy in February, compared with 3.7% yoy in January 2012 and 4.6% yoy in December 2011, thanks mainly to the continuing declines in food price inflation after last years bumper harvest. However, inflation is very likely to rebound later in the year, in view of unfavorable base effects, a likely decline in agricultural output and spending pressures ahead of the elections in October. The recent sharp decline in inflation was due, in part, to new CPI basket weights that reduced the share of food products and also increased the weight of imported goods in the CPI. This should lead to a higher pass-through effect from changes in the exchange rate, increasing the impact on inflation of potential currency depreciation. Last years steep deterioration in the current account deficit, from 2.1% of GDP in 2010 to 5.6% of GDP in 2011, was due mainly to increases in the value of energy imports. The foreign trade deficit was recorded at 8.4% of GDP in 2011. The deterioration in the current account is set to slow in Q1 2012, in our view, due to sharply lower volumes of imported gas compared to Q1 2011 (when Naftogaz had to buy an additional quantity of gas worth $3.2bn to settle a lawsuit with RosUkrEnergo). External data for December 2011 and January 2012 painted a slightly less negative picture compared to the previous several months, thanks mainly to a further slowdown in import growth, as well as lower household purchases of FX. However, we expect that the bill for oil and gas energy imports will rise in H1 2012 compared to H1 2011, while export values will likely be curbed due to stagnant metal prices and export volumes. Accordingly, the deterioration of the current account is very likely to continue in 2012, aggravating a key credit vulnerability, unless an agreement with Russia is reached soon. The current price terms for Ukraines gas imports from Russia are highly unfavorable. Ukraines price for Russian gas is $416/tcm in Q1 2012, after a $100/tcm reduction off a formula-base price agreed upon in 2009. While it corresponds to this years assumed gas price in the budget, Ukraine has been pushing for a much larger additional discount, of at least 150/tcm, due to its status as the largest transit country for Gazprom and the much lower prices for those European gas consumers that have access to the spot market. To
90
14 March 2012
date, the only concession offered to Naftogaz by Gazprom was a 10% discount off the formula price (i.e. some $40/tcm). Gazprom has also failed to amend the terms of its takeor-pay contract, prompting Ukraine to threaten a cut in import volumes this year by a third unilaterally, to just 27bcm. The decision by the government and central bank to maintain the hryvnias peg intact despite the persisting balance of payments deficits has been arguably the most controversial element of Ukraines policy mix recently. The stock of gross FX reserves has been falling steadily since August (when it was $38.2bn) through end- February, to $31.0bn. Cumulative FX interventions over this period totaled $6.2bn (central bank data), slightly less that than the nominal decline in the stock of reserves ($7.2bn). The non-gold part of the reserves ($29.4bn) represents just over three months of imports. In the approved budget for 2012, revenues have been calculated on a real GDP growth assumption of 3.9%. The slowdown in external demand since late 2011 has affected Ukraines growth prospects for this year. Accordingly, it is unlikely that the budgeted growth level will be overshot, in our view, while a shortfall is an acute risk. The very low inflation level has further adverse implications for the governments ability to meet nominal budget targets for the year as a whole. On 7 March, President Yanukovich announced additional social spending allocations in this years budget, in excess of 1.2% of this years GDP. The package of measures includes an increase in pensions to the nine million people who retired before 2008, with an estimated cost of UAH7.2bn ($0.9bn), pension increases to various other categories of retirees, resumption of compensation payments to six million depositors of the Soviet-era savings bank (UAH6.0bn, $0.86bn), and mortgage and medicine subsidies. Senior government officials claimed that the government has already secured the funds to cover the extra spending but little evidence is available to back this up. As of end-February, the balance on the governments hryvnia accounts with the central bank was a mere UAH4.7bn ($0.6bn). The governments reserves in FX were reportedly around $1.5bn in January, clearly not sufficient to cover all forthcoming payments to both private and multilateral creditors. In view of the constraints on the governments ability to strengthen revenue performance materially this year, the focus should be on the availability of financing sources. On our estimates, the government would be able to finance even a relatively modest state budget deficit this year (2.7% of GDP) without IFI financing only if it was able to secure a significant subsidy from Russia on imported gas prices, allowing a significant part of Naftogazs operational deficit to be covered. The delay in the agreement with Russia and the decision to de facto give up on the IMF program ahead of the elections have combined to create an acute risk that the government will have to resort to exceptional financing means, such as monetary financing or debt restructuring. Ukraines government funding needs in 2012 look challenging, given the lack of progress in the talks with the IMF. Besides the $1bn due to the IFIs from the government and $2.6bn from the central bank, Ukraine is also facing the need to refinance the $2bn VTB loan maturing in June 2012 (probably, the least onerous task) and the $0.5bn Eurobond (also in June). Despite the recent tightening of spreads, the likelihood of a new issue of some $1.7bn of Eurobonds in Q1 2012 (targeted by the government) appears low to us at the moment, without support from either of Ukraines largest counterparties (the IMF or Russia). Accordingly, the government would have to rely primarily on domestic borrowing and Russia-related financing sources. According to recent opinion polls, the political opposition has being steadily gaining ground against the coalition parties. According to a poll by Razumkov Centre, support for the Regions Party fell to an all-time low of 13.9% in December, below that for Yulia Tymoshenko bloc (15.8%). The Front of Change party led by Yatsenyuk was running third with 9.6% followed by the UDAR party led by Klitchko (7.5%). Results of these polls point to a likely formation of a majority by opposition groups in the next Rada, putting strong pressure on the Regions Party leaders to prevent such a scenario.
Emerging Markets Quarterly
91
14 March 2012
Real GDP growth slowed in Q4 2011 to 4.7% yoy (0.5% qoq in seasonally adjusted terms), after 6.6% yoy (2.2% qoq sa) in Q3 2011 and 3.8% yoy (0.5% qoq sa) in Q2 2011, due mainly to sharply weaker external demand. Agriculture contributed 2.3pps to Q3 2011 growth. Prospects for 2012 are highly uncertain because of an unusual concentration of various risk factors, both domestic and external.
120 110
100 90 80 70 Industrial output Key sectors output IP, SA (2007=100), right scale 60 Jul-07 Jan-09 Jul-10 Jan-12
Sep-08
Mar-10
Sep-11
Note: The NBUs key sectors indicator covers 72% of GDP. Source: State Statistics Agency, NBU, Credit Suisse
Inflation continued to decline sharply in 2012, to a nine-year low of 3.0% yoy in February, almost entirely due to lower food prices. The possibility of tariff increases in Q4 2012, a weaker currency and spending pressures ahead of Rada elections next October are likely to cause inflation to rebound to about 6% by year-end, on our estimates.
40
30
20
40 Services Transport & telecoms Housing & utilities 30 Non-food Food Headline CPI inflation 20
30 25 20 15 10 5
30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 Feb-12
10
10
0 -5 May-09
0 Jun-07
Aug-08
Oct-09
Dec-10
0 Feb-12
Apr-10
Mar-11
95 75 55 35 15 -5 -25 -45
Dec-08
Jun-10
-65 Dec-11
92
14 March 2012
Exchange rate volatility has subsided since the beginning of 2011. The central banks determination to maintain the currency peg in the face of weaker prices for key export products risks a prolonged spell of declining reserves. Since the beginning of 2012, the central bank has cut some of its policy rates (but not the discount rate) by 50bps, the first such moves since 2009.
20
20
15
15
10
10
NBU Discount rate T-bill yields, primary, up to 1 months 2 Interbank lending rate 7-30 day
Apr-08
Jul-09
Oct-10
Jan-12
*Real effective exchange rate, an increase denotes appreciation. TM Source: BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, Credit Suisse.
Ukraines overall balance of payments situation has worsened considerably since August 2011, with the central bank selling some $6.2bn in FX reserves over the past six months in order to keep the currency close to its target of UAH8.0 per USD. The central bank has reported that its monetary policy conduct has won support from the IMF.
42 39 36 33 30 27 24 21 18
25 15 5
M2
Jan-08
Jan-09
Jan-10
Jan-11
Jan-12
Source: National Bank of Ukraine, Credit Suisse
The state budget performance in late 2011 was appropriate, with the officially reported deficit of the state budget (net of Naftogaz subsidies) at just 1.8% of GDP. The operational deficit of Naftogaz, which we estimate was 1.7% of GDP in 2011, cannot be cut without higher tariffs or lower gas prices. Reaching a new gas supply agreement with Russia has proven difficult thus far.
4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Apr-07 Jun-08 Aug-09 Oct-10 Overall balance (left scale) Revenue Expenditure
30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 Dec-11
* H2 2009 revenues are net of 1.8% of GDP SDR conversions; August 2010 data are net of 1.5% of VAT arrears. Source: Economy Ministry, Credit Suisse
93
14 March 2012
(1) Real effective exchange rate, increase indicates appreciation. (2) Excluding impact of bank recapitalization and transfers to Naftogaz. (3) Scheduled amortization of the private and the public sectors. Source: National Bank of Ukraine, Ministry of Finance, Economy Ministry, State Statistics Office, IMF, Credit Suisse
94
14 March 2012
Non-Japan Asia
95
14 March 2012
Chinas liquidity situation has visibly improved since the beginning of the year, reducing significantly the risk of a hard landing, in our view. In the first two months of 2012, banks lent out RMB 1.45tn, lower than the average for same period in the previous three years, but still a remarkable improvement in lending attitude compared to the final four months last year. Not only do SOEs have access to credit, but local government financial vehicles and SMEs have also regained access. Banks are also more active in making mortgage loans to first time home buyers. The improvement in liquidity is the biggest change in the economy relative to three months ago. However, demand remains muted and growth may surprise on the downside. Despite banks willingness to lend, organic demand for loans outside of the property sector seems to have weakened. Banks are now chasing after quality borrowers, in sharp contrast to last year. We think that there is a sea-change, as the constraint to lending has shifted from policy restrictions to demand limitation. Anecdotally, heavy industries are in pain, more so than in 2008-09. Retail sales, especially for automobiles and white goods, are also unimpressive. In our judgment, 1Q12 growth and corporate earnings may well surprise on the downside, despite an easier lending environment. We project 7.5% GDP growth for 1Q on an annualized QoQ basis. Industrial production grew 11.4% yoy during the first two months this year, compared to 12.8% yoy last December and a 13.7% average growth in 2011. This is the weakest production growth since July 2009, underscoring the lack of growth momentum. Inventory correction is occurring everywhere, and in the machinery and raw material sectors in particular. Fixed asset investment grew at 21.5% in same period, which was slightly better than expected. Apparently, local governments have resumed some stalled infrastructure projects following easier bank lending, but this is expected to be weak and may not even last, as we expect the local governments to repair their balance sheets. Industrial investment has been muted, as production costs have surged, fuelled by rising salaries. Retail sales were soft during the Chinese New Year holiday. The dip in housing transactions has reduced the need for electronics products and interior decoration. Restrictions on car sales in an attempt to curb traffic jams in some cities have also hurt auto sales. While retail sales have softened, they are still more robust than the manufacturing sector. Manufacturing PMI has been struggling at around 50, and the sector appears to be in a recession. But non-manufacturing PMI stays brisk at around 58 the reason being Chinas consumption story, which is fuelled by urbanization and wage hikes. Strong non-manufacturing PMI is the pillar supporting our confidence that the economy is unlikely to slip into a hard landing (growth below 6%), assuming that housing prices do not collapse. We do not expect large-scale stimulus in the coming months, although more required reserves ratio cuts are likely. To the PBoCs governor and to us, cutting the RRR is a technical adjustment. Regulators are asking banks to bring their off-balance sheet activities back to book, and that increases the base that is subject to reserve charges. Maintaining the status quo in RRR means that banks must hand over more liquidity to the central banks reserves account. We expect two more cuts in RRR. However, the economy is growing at a pace of 7.5% to 8.5%, with about 4% inflation. This is a good result, and the economy is not slipping into deflation. The fact that Premier Wen Jiabao set this years growth target at 7.5%, instead of the usual 8%, has sent a strong message that Beijing does not mind a slower growth pace during the period of economic transformation, provided that social stability is not threatened.
96
14 March 2012
During our meetings with senior officials, we sense strong confidence in their ability to manage the economy, in contrast to the lack of such confidence in Q4 2008 before a huge stimulus program was launched. There is consensus among key decision makers that the RMB 4trn stimulus at that time did more harm than good to the long-term sustainability of growth. Unless the economy shows signs of a hard landing and social stability appears to be in danger, we do not expect large-scale stimulus to be launched. Chinas labor market has moved from very tight to tight. The most troubled heavy industries are not labor intensive. The export sector is laying off workers, but they have been absorbed by the services sector. Further, as more jobs become available in the inland provinces, fewer migrant workers are willing to come to the coastal areas. A solid labor market makes Beijing feel more relaxed about the growth slowdown. Indeed, we think that growth at 7% or 5% would make a difference to the labor market and hence could lead to a different policy response from the government. The trade balance in February turned to a $31.5bn deficit compared to a $13.1bn average monthly surplus last year. This has raised concerns about whether RMB appreciation against the USD is running out of steam. We do not think so. First, export orders seems to have improved, lifted by the acceleration in the US recovery and better sentiment regarding the European debt crisis. Second, we think the worst of the capital account outflow is over. Third, the RMB exchange rate is a political call instead of a balance of payments call. With the US in an election year, we think Chinese leaders will maintain the RMBs gradual appreciation trend. We look for 3% RMB appreciation against the USD in 2012 and 2013, respectively. RMB internationalization is a much bigger story. It involves interest rate de-regulation, the build-up of an off-shore financial center, liberalization of the capital account, etc. We expect to see the RMB achieving over 90% convertibility under the current and capital accounts by 2016. We expect inflation to stay moderate in the coming months but to rebound toward year-end. Inflation may hover around 3.5% in the coming months, trending lower from 3.9% yoy in January-February, helped by weakened domestic demand and a favorable base effect. For the full year, we project inflation to average 3.7% in 2012, below the policy target of 4%. But that said, we think inflation should rebound and reach 4.4% yoy by year-end, when the favorable base effect fades away. In our view, the drivers of price hikes have not disappeared. Salary increases are continuing, while food prices are still on the rise, fuelled by rising production and transportation costs. The government is also prepared to launch more price de-regulation. The housing sector is the biggest swing factor for the Chinese economy this year. Residential property transaction volumes were down from a year ago, but sales improved in February. While those large developers that have access to international capital market are fine with liquidity, smaller developers are having cash flow problems. Unless transactions continue to grow in the next few months, we still expect to see a large number of bankruptcies among the smaller developers. However, we think local governments are likely to use their own property arms to take over weak developers. We do not expect to see a reverse in housing policy, which is engineered by Vice Premier Li Keqiang, until he becomes the next premier in March 2013. There are a few possible initiatives on structural reforms that may become the focal points this year. Tax code reshuffling, combining corporate tax and VAT, and lowering individual tax but with widened spread may draw attention. De-regulating the price-setting rules for fuel and power, while inflation softens briefly, is also possible. Interest rate deregulation is an issue for 2013, but this topic may get attention later this year it has major implications for banking sector profitability, in our view. China has entered a period of power succession, and we expect policy continuity. The key successors were brought on board four years ago, and they played major roles when policies were set in December 2011. Party officials are scheduled to change guard in October 2012; government officials will do the same in March 2013. We do not anticipate a ratings change for China over the next six months. Chinas rating is Aa3 (positive) at Moodys, AA- (stable) at S&P, and A+ (stable) at Fitch.
Emerging Markets Quarterly
97
14 March 2012
1Q12 growth and corporate earnings may well surprise on the downside, despite an easier lending environment.
4,000
2,000 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Source: PBoC, Credit Suisse
5 0
May-07 Aug-07 Nov-07 Feb-08 May-08 Aug-08 Nov-08 Feb-09 May-09 Aug-09 Nov-09 Feb-10 May-10 Aug-10 Nov-10 Feb-11 May-11 Aug-11 Nov-11 Feb-12
14 12
May-07 Aug-07 Nov-07 Feb-08 May-08 Aug-08 Nov-08 Feb-09 May-09 Aug-09 Nov-09 Feb-10 May-10 Aug-10 Nov-10 Feb-11 May-11 Aug-11 Nov-11 Feb-12
Manufacturing PMI has been struggling at around 50, and the sector appears to be in a recession. But non-manufacturing PMI stays brisk at around 58 the reason being Chinas consumption story, which is fuelled by urbanization and wage hikes.
60 55 50 45 40 35 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Source: NBS, CLIC, Credit Suisse
65 60 55 50
PMI improved, but could reflect seasonality 2005 2008 2011 2006 2009 2012 2007 2010
45 40 35
Feb-08 May-08 Aug-08 Nov-08 Feb-09 May-09 Aug-09 Nov-09 Feb-10 May-10 Aug-10 Nov-10 Feb-11 May-11 Aug-11 Nov-11 Feb-12
Source: NBS, CLIC, Credit Suisse
98
14 March 2012
Jul-11
Jan-11
Beijing
USDRMB
14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 May-09 Feb-10 May-10 Feb-11 May-11 Nov-09 Nov-10 Aug-09 Aug-10 Nov-11 Aug-11 Feb-12
Jan-08
Jan-12
Jan-09
Jan-10
Jul-12
Jan-11
Jan-12
99
14 March 2012
(1) Calculated based on annual GDP data released by the NBS. (2) Calculated based on annual GDP data released by the NBS. (3) Real effective exchange rate: increase indicates appreciation. (4) Include Treasury bond and foreign state debt owed by the State Council only. 2010F level is estimated to be 50.3%, including local governments affiliated debt. (5) Scheduled and estimated amortizations for medium- and long-term public and private sector debt. (6) Public debt defined as direct loans by government, state banks and SOEs, excluding trade credit. Source: National Bureau of Statistics, Peoples Bank of China, CEIC, Credit Suisse
100
14 March 2012
Hong Kongs growth should remain slow, but the trough could have been reached. A better-than-expected US recovery and improved stability in the European sovereign debt situation have made us less concerned about Hong Kongs external demand condition. 4Q11 GDP growth was weaker than expected at 3% yoy, or 0.3% on a quarterly seasonally adjusted basis (1.2% annualized). We think that growth momentum should improve but remain weak in 1H12, supported by better developed market growth and the gradual moderation in Chinas growth. We have kept our 2012 GDP growth forecast unchanged at 3%, vis--vis the governments 1%-3% estimate. The breakdown of the 4Q11 GDP report showed that external trade flows slowed more than domestic demand. Real export and import growth slowed to a low-single-digit level in 4Q, but private consumption and fixed investment growth were more resilient, at 6.4% yoy and 9% yoy, respectively. We think that this reflects the relative resilience of domestic demand, supported by Chinas growth and a low-interest-rate environment locally. In our view, Hong Kongs wealth and financial system have not been severely affected by the global credit crisis. The purchasing power of the domestic residents have remained intact, cushioning the moderation in consumption and employment. Property transactions have rebounded, pushing up prices again, but we think that the uptrend could be temporary. We think that the latest bounce in property transactions was driven by (1) a return of risk appetite, driven by an improved outlook on the developed economies; (2) a low-interest-rate environment, which is supportive of leverage; and (3) better funding condition for banks and their refocus on the mortgage business. These have helped release the pent-up demand of end users, which was on hold over the past six months. Although we think that the risk of home prices is tilted to the upside in the near term, higher offer prices are expected to taper market activity progressively. In our view, the eventual normalization of US interest rates would reverse the current drivers of rising property prices. We think that inflationary pressure will remain persistent in the economy. Headline inflation accelerated to 6.1% yoy in January, higher than the consensus expectation. We had expected weaker growth momentum, as prices were supported by elevated food prices in China, the appreciating RMB, resilient consumption demand, and the upswing of the private housing rent adjustment cycle. We expect inflation to remain resilient around 5% in 2012, keeping the real interest rate level negative. Trade growth is expected to rebound in February, but the January-February growth pace should remain moderate. January trade growth disappointed, falling more than anticipated from a year ago as a result of the Chinese New Year effect. We think that February data is important to take into account to get a clearer view of the latest trade trend. Although the external environment should remain weak, the latest indicators from the developed world and China suggest some improvement. Further recovery, however, would depend on the sustainability of the global economic recovery. The chief executive election will be held on 25 March. There will be three candidates in the election: (1) Former Chief Secretary Henry Tang; (2) Former Convenor of the Executive Council Leung Chun Ying; and (3) Chairman of the Democratic Party Albert Ho. The newly elected chief executive will assume office on 1 July this year, taking over from the incumbent Donald Tsang, who is stepping down after two terms in office. The latest public poll shows that Leung is leading, but as there are only 1,200 election committee members who are eligible to vote, the final result may still be uncertain. The outlook for Hong Kongs ratings appears stable. Adjustment remains unlikely over the next six months, in our view. Hong Kong is currently rated Aa1 (Moodys), AAA (S&P), and AA+ (Fitch).
101
14 March 2012
2Q05 4Q05 2Q06 4Q06 2Q07 4Q07 2Q08 4Q08 2Q09 4Q09 2Q10 4Q10 2Q11 4Q11
Aggregate Balance (HKD bn, RHS) 3M HIBOR (%) 3M USD LIBOR (%) Fed fund target rate (%)
We think that inflationary pressure will remain persistent in the economy, fuelled by the continuation of excess liquidity.
5 4 3 2 1 0 2001
102
14 March 2012
25
Prices were supported by the elevated food prices in China, the appreciating RMB, resilient consumption demand, and the upswing of the private housing rent adjustment cycle.
Although the external environment should remain weak, the latest indicators from the developed world and China suggest some improvement. Further recovery, however, would depend on the sustainability of the global economic recovery.
2005
2007
2009
2011
HKD has strengthened toward the strong side again, as foreign capital returns to the asset markets. Leung is leading in the polls, but the final outcome of the chief executive election remains uncertain.
7.82 7.81 7.8 7.79 7.78 7.77 7.76 7.75 7.74 May-09
USDHKD
Albert Ho 11%
May-10
May-11
Jan-09
Jan-10
Jan-11
Sep-09
Sep-10
Sep-11
Jan-12
Note: Survey done between 6 and 11 March 2012. Source: Public Opinion Program University of Hong Kong, Credit Suisse
103
14 March 2012
(1) Real effective exchange rate, increase indicates appreciation. (2) Also includes debt issued under the Government Bond Program. Excludes debt guaranteed by the government. (3) Scheduled and estimated amortizations for total medium- and long-term public and private sector debt. (4) Non-bank foreign debt to Hong Kong entities. Source: Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong Monetary Authority, CEIC, Credit Suisse
104
14 March 2012
From our macroeconomic perspective, India looks to have entered a sweet spot in the economic cycle, helping justify and hopefully extend the rally we have seen in markets so far this calendar year. If we are right, the coming months will witness a confluence of positive factors as GDP growth begins to pick up, inflation continues to fall and interest rates (both short and long term) drop with a thump. To be clear, this is not to suggest that the countrys various structural weaknesses have been resolved (far from it), but rather to indicate that shorter-term cyclical drivers are likely to dominate sentiment for much of the current calendar year. The light at the end of the tunnel that we referred to in the previous edition of this publication is not an on-coming train or, at least, not this time. Our main non-consensus call is for a repo rate cut totaling 175bps by early 2013. As far as we know, this is more than any economic analyst is looking for and mainly reflects our relative optimism regarding the outlook for wholesale price inflation, Indias key price measure. We would also emphasis that the potential reduction should be seen in the context of the 500bps of effective tightening that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) delivered during 2010-11, while it would only take the repo rate 25bps below its longterm average. If we are right, WPI inflation will fall below 6% in the next few months, averaging 5.8% in the 2012/13 fiscal year as a whole. The headline or all-items rate of inflation has already dropped from close to 10% in October last year to less than 7%, albeit largely on the back of a collapse in food price inflation. It is hard to see food price inflation, which is already negative in year-on-year terms and close to a record low, declining further from here, while likely energy price rises would keep a floor under the fuel component as well (note that we also do not expect a strong rise in fuel price inflation as petrol, diesel, LPG and kerosene prices were all hiked reasonably aggressively in mid-2011, making for a helpful base effect). As such, any further fall in the headline WPI rate will almost certainly need to come via lower price increases in manufactured products. This component accounts for nearly two-thirds of the total index. Manufacturing WPI inflation has proved surprisingly stubborn, but the omens for a fall are encouraging. The weakness of primary food prices, referred to above, bodes well for a deceleration in manufactured food price growth, while the drop in international metal commodity price inflation, from 40% to zero in rupee terms, should herald a drop in the RBIs preferred measure of core inflation. The fact that this has yet to materialize in a meaningful fashion, so far, is probably the consequence of Indias positive output gap (the level of output is above trend). This is now changing, however, as economic growth is running at a rate we judge to be well below the increase in the countrys productive potential. History suggests that it can take six months or so before a period of sub-trend growth has a meaningful impact on prices. Most argue that inflation is almost certain to head higher from around mid-2012. We disagree. Unless one takes a reasonably aggressive view regarding the likely development of international commodity price inflation and/or the rupee it seems to us that headline WPI inflation will probably flatten out later this year, rather than shooting higher (or lower). This is certainly the message of the middle chart on the next but one page, where we have assumed that the level of the Brent oil price is stable at USD125/barrel, the rupee is at 50 against the US dollar and the Commodity Research Bureau (CRB) food and metal indices remain at their current level. Of course, if oil and other commodity prices were to shoot higher from here then our inflation and interest rate views are likely to be wrong.
105
14 March 2012
We believe the importance of WPI inflation as a driver of RBI interest rate policy has increased significantly. Since the current governor took charge of the central bank in September 2008 it is noticeable how the repo rate looks to have become a coincident or slightly lagging indicator of price developments. This is a very different approach from that taken by Dr. Subbaraos predecessors and, in our view, runs a greater risk of policy mistakes. After all, WPI inflation, which is largely a function of international commodity developments, is probably driven more by growth in the likes of China than it is in India itself. Indias GDP growth is at, or close to, the bottom, in our view. Having fallen to just 6.1% in the December quarter of 2011, close to the 5.8% low experienced during the global financial crisis, we believe year-on-year GDP growth will improve during the course of 2012. The main reason for optimism stems from the sharp improvement seen in Indias manufacturing and service sector PMIs over recent months. As the charts on the next page reveal, the former looks to be consistent with roughly 10% industrial growth, with the latter pointing to slightly more than that in services. While reality is unlikely to prove quite as rosy as this, there are other, more fundamental, reasons for believing that a recovery is close at hand. We expect net exports and private consumption to drive the initial recovery phase. The combination of a pick up in the world trade cycle, as evidenced by the improvement in business confidence surveys throughout the world, and the fall in Indias real trade weighted exchange rate bodes well for the countrys exports. At the same time, import growth is likely to slow given the weakness of domestic demand. This combination not only bodes well for real GDP growth, but should also help stabilize the trade deficit, which continues to deteriorate. Meanwhile, our modeling work suggests that private consumption will benefit from the sizeable boost to real incomes stemming from the recent drop in food prices. Despite the importance of the rural sector, it seems to us that very few people in India actually benefit from rising food prices. Capital spending is likely to remain a brake on growth during 2012. Unfortunately, the lagged effects of the RBIs rate increases during 2011, coupled with on-going high levels of international and domestic uncertainty will continue to cap investment growth for the time being, in our view. The best we can say is that capital spending should stop contracting, but a strong pick up is unlikely to materialize until the benefits of the anticipated rate reductions are felt in 2013. Partly for this reason, it is not until next year that overall GDP growth is likely to exceed its trend rate, which we put at 7.5%. We remain skeptical about the governments ability to engineer sizeable structural improvements in the economy. It remains to be seen whether the postponed plan to allow multi-brand retailers to set up shop in India eventually comes to fruition, but we are certainly not holding our breath. The poor showing of the governing Congress party in this years state elections could even encourage a more populist stance from the government. In particular, it will no doubt be keener than ever to push through the food security bill, designed to provide subsidized food grains to 75% of the rural population and 50% of urban-dwellers. The total cost of the plan is currently pegged at around 1% of GDP enough to put a sizeable dent in the governments already fragile public finances. It is unclear how this will be financed, although there is, in our view, legitimate hope that the introduction of the Direct Tax Code (DTC) and GST will help somewhat. Risks of a sovereign downgrade? It is important to stress that India is a long way from experiencing the sort of unsustainable rise in its public debt that is becoming all too familiar in the developed world (thanks mainly to the countrys strong money GDP growth). But it is clear that the rating agencies will be paying close attention to the 16 March budget. In the absence of a credible tightening of the fiscal purse strings, India could well be placed on watch for a downgrade back to non-investment grade.
106
14 March 2012
Government is highly likely to raise subsidized fuel prices given the renewed increase in the price of oil. But this will not lead to a pick up in the energy component of the WPI if prices are, as we suspect, raised by a similar amount to last year. Meanwhile, manufacturing ex. food inflation has yet to reflect the drop in international metal commodity price inflation. We expect it to do so shortly.
% y-o-y
23 18 13 8 3 -2 -7 -12
05 06 07 08
In rupee terms
Source: CEIC, Credit Reserve
09
10
11
12
Source: CEIC
In our view, WPI inflation, Indias key price measure, will average 5.8% in 2012/13 comfortably below the Bloomberg consensus forecast of 6.6%. The fact that rupeedenominated international commodity price inflation has dropped so sharply and leads the headline rate bodes well for a further decline in WPI inflation. Unlike many, we are not convinced it will show a meaningful rise in the second half of the year.
Average of CRB food & metal price index as well as Brent oil. ** Assumes level of INR denominated CRB index is unchanged and Brent oil price of USD125/barrel Source: CEIC, Credit Suisse forecast
% y-o-y
70 65 60 55 50 45 40 06 07
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 11 12
08
09
10
05 06 07 08 09
Source: Credit Suisse, CEIC, Markit
107
14 March 2012
In practice, we find it harder to be so optimistic when looking at the prospects for the expenditure breakdown of GDP. In particular, our model suggests that capital spending growth is likely to remain muted in 2012. Nevertheless, the fall in food prices bodes well for private consumption growth, while we also expect some improvement in net exports. Our GDP growth forecast for 2012/13 remains at 7.3%.
25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 00
'Actual' Model
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 02
'Actual' Model
02
04
06
08
10
12
04
06
08
10
12
With WPI inflation set to fall below 6%, in our view, and GDP growth unlikely to move above trend (which we put at 7.5%) until 2013, there is plenty of room for the RBI to cut policy rates. We are looking for a consensus-busting 175bps of repo rate cuts by January 2013, taking the rate down to 6.75%, with the CRR falling another 75bps to 4.0%.
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 01 02 03
Repo rate
CRR
F'cst
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 05/06
80 75 70 65 60 55 50 85/86 88/89
06/07
07/08
08/09
09/10
10/11
11/12 F
12/13 F
91/92
94/95
97/98
00/01
03/04
06/07
09/10
108
14 March 2012
(1) The years above are fiscal years beginning in April and ending in March, i.e., 2010 refers to the period of April 2010-March 2011, also written as FY2010/11. (2) Revised GDP series with base 2004-05. All historical ratios expressed as % of GDP may appear smaller since the revised GDP values in the new series (with base year of 2004) are higher. (3) Real effective exchange rate: an increase indicates appreciation. (4) The RBI uses a mix of instruments such as the repo rate, reverse repo rate, CRR (Cash Reserve Ratio), etc. (5) Note, effective from 2010, the central government includes proceeds from disinvestments as revenue in calculating the fiscal deficit. Source: Ministry of Finance, Reserve Bank of India, CSO, CEIC, Credit Suisse
109
14 March 2012
Inflation down, rates cut. In the previous edition of this publication, we pointed to the risks of the central bank keeping monetary policy too loose for too long, eventually leading to an overheating economy. Since then, Bank Indonesia has cut the policy rate another 25bps to a new record low of 5.75%, while the bottom end of the interest rate corridor has come down to just 3.75%. At the same time, however, the headline rate of inflation has eased further, falling to 3.6% in the latest number for February the lowest figure since March 2010. This weakness was mainly the result of a softening in food price inflation, although even the core rate moved a fraction lower to 4.3%. So does the inflation trajectory support the rate-cutting case? Not in our view. Fuel effects. With the crude oil price taking another leg up, the government looks to have decided to make one its periodic adjustments to subsidized fuel prices, apparently dropping the plan to shift private sector four-wheel vehicles from subsidized to unsubsidized fuel. The suggested IDR1,500 a liter (33%) increase, which is still subject to parliamentary approval at the time of writing, is expected to add roughly two percentage points directly to the headline rate of inflation and another 0.5pp-1pp as a second-round effect. As such, and assuming the measure is implemented at the beginning of April, inflation could be running close to 7% by mid-year. It is worth noting that if the government chooses not to increase subsidized fuel prices then the risk is that the budget deficit would exceed the implicit 3% of GDP limit. In any event, the authorities may choose to spend some of the money generated in the form of welfare support. Underlying inflation concerns. On top of what should be a temporary effect of the fuel price hike, we remain concerned about the longer-term prospects for core inflation. While the good news is that we can find statistically robust evidence of a structural improvement in underlying inflation (see Indonesias great rate gamble, 22 November 2011), this does not mean that core price pressures will always remain muted. Growing above trend. We believe the trend rate of economic growth in Indonesia is no more than 6%, below the current GDP growth rate of 6.5%, let alone the presidents 7%+ growth target that he aims to achieve by end of his second and final term in 2014. Our view is more pessimistic than that of many, including the central bank, which pegs trend growth at 6.5%-7%. In part, this likely reflects contrasting calculations regarding the investment share in GDP. Strangely, while the nominal gross fixed investment share is 34%, it is only 26% in real terms. Exactly why the price of capital goods should have risen so much more than goods in the economy as a whole (220% versus 140% since the beginning of 2003) is not entirely clear. However, it seems to us that when thinking about real trend growth we should pay more attention to the share of real investment in real GDP. Signs of overheating? If we are right, then the economy should be eating into spare capacity and showing more and more signs of overheating. Although few, if any, indicators are flashing red right now, this process does indeed seem to be under way. The countrys jobless rate, for example, has all but halved over the last five years, while this years minimum wage hikes look set to be higher than normal in real terms. Property prices are surging (in Jakarta at least), the current account is deteriorating (it moved into deficit for the first time in two years in Q4 2011), and money and credit growth are rising strongly. It is also noticeable that retailers price expectations have moved sharply higher over the last few months hitting their strongest level for two years in January (the latest available figure) this year. At the same time, consumer price expectations (for six months ahead) are currently at their second highest level since the series started in 2006. Admittedly, as we have pointed out, inflation has yet to show any signs of picking up, but it is important to bear in mind that consumer prices are often the last indicator to turn.
110
14 March 2012
Central bank rate reaction. Bank Indonesia has indicated that the upper limit of its 3.5%-5.5% target range for headline CPI inflation is likely to be breached if the government does raise fuel prices by the suggested amount. The question is, however, will the central bank choose to see through the resulting uptick or react to the move by raising rates? History at least suggests the latter is the more likely outcome, although we very much doubt any rate action would be aggressive for fear of undermining the countrys growth prospects. It may not even involve a hike in the BI rate, but rather a move up in the politically less contentious FASBI rate and/or an increase in reserve requirements to mop up excess liquidity. Lending growth. Bank Indonesia appears to be particularly keen not to affect lending growth, partly on the grounds that the economy is underleveraged. But while it is true to say that the Indonesias bank credit/GDP ratio, at 27%, is the lowest in the region, lending can still expand at too rapid a rate. Indeed, our fear is that some loans are being made on the basis of unrealistic assumptions about interest rates and/or economic growth, for example. Within total loan growth, it is at least reasonably reassuring that credit for investment purposes is expanding at more than 30%, compared with 24% for consumption. Bond and currency market risks. With this in mind and despite the recent move higher in yields, it is hard to be optimistic about the countrys sovereign bonds. The rupiah is also at risk, with our foreign exchange team expecting the currency to be amongst the weakest performers in the region over coming months. Revising up our inflation and growth forecasts. Not only are we moving our 2012 inflation forecasts higher (from 5.9% at year-end to 7.3%) to reflect the likely impact of the fuel price hike, we are also upping our year average GDP growth forecasts for both this year and next to 6.4% and 6.6% respectively (from 5.9% and 6.5%). The growth revisions may seem a little odd given the prospect of higher energy prices, but, as mentioned, real incomes are unlikely to take that much of a hit as the government boosts welfare spending in return. In addition, we have been extremely impressed by the seemingly bullet-proof nature of the economy. Year-on-year GDP growth moved in a tiny 6bps range during the course of 2011, with the central bank forecasting a fourth consecutive quarter of 6.5% growth in Q1 2012. We cannot think of another economy in the world that has shown such extraordinary stability and resilience in recent times. Signs of protectionism? The governments recent decision to reduce the limit on foreign ownership of local mines to 49% from 80% (companies will have 10 years to comply with the presidents decree) has caused some concerns amongst existing and potential investors based abroad. Many are asking whether this represents an isolated incident or the tip of a protectionist iceberg. To our minds, the Indonesian authorities were never going to give foreign companies unlimited access to the domestic market, not least in the commodities space, and hence this development should not have come as a massive surprise. As we see it, while Indonesia is a vastly different country to the one that entered the Asian crisis in the late-1990s, there are some things that have not changed that much.
111
14 March 2012
A huge and strange gap has opened up between the nominal and real investment shares of GDP. This has important implications for estimates of trend GDP growth in the country. Since the beginning of 2003, while prices in the economy as a whole have risen 140%, they have risen 220% for investment goods. It is hard to explain the full extent of the gap.
35 33 31 29 27 25 23 21 19 17 15
Real Nominal
93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11
Source: Credit Suisse, CEIC
01
03
05
07
09
11
The good news is that even the real investment share in GDP has been rising, although we suspect it is consistent with no more than 6% trend growth. The economy has, however, been growing at more than this rate for a while now, reducing spare capacity. The remarkable stability of Indonesian GDP growth compared with many of its Asian neighbors is also worth noting.
Exhibit 290: Indonesian GDP growth has probably been running above trend
% y-o-y
10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 00 01 02 03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
07
08
09
10
11
12
112
14 March 2012
Further evidence that the economy is growing above trend is given by the trend deterioration in the current (and trade) account balance. Meanwhile, the countrys unemployment rate has all but halved over the last five years and, although it is still quite high by past standards, there is a concern that the structural rate of joblessness has increased.
Current account
12 10
Unemployment rate
3 2 1 0 -1 -2 05
Source: CEIC
8 6 4 2 0 06 08 09 11 85 88 91 94 97 00 03 06 09
Source: CEIC
20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 03 04 05 06
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 13
07
08
09
10
11
12
The government has signaled its intention to raise subsidized fuel prices by IDR1,500/litre (33%). This is most likely to happen in April and we estimate it will add around 2-3pps to inflation when one includes both direct and indirect effects. The renewed strength of money and lending growth, which tend to lead underlying inflation, presents further, mediumterm, upside risks to inflation.
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
% y-o-y 21
19 17 15 13 11 9
95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11
Source: Credit Suisse, CEIC
113
14 March 2012
(1) Real effective exchange rate, increase indicates appreciation. (2) Nominal wage: manufacturing. (3) BI changed its policy target from 1m SBI rate to overnight rate in 2008. (4) Refers to central government. The government assumed an oil price of $61 per barrel for 2009 in its revised budget announced in June 2009. (5) Excludes SOE and BI debt. (6) BoP numbers from 2004 onwards have been revised; exports & imports include credits & debits on net income, respectively, in 2000-03. Source: Bank Indonesia, Ministry of Finance, Central Bureau Statistics, CEIC, World Bank, Credit Suisse
114
14 March 2012
We think growth may have troughed, but it is likely to remain slow amidst an uncertain global growth environment. On a quarter-on-quarter sequential basis, Koreas GDP growth has slowed from 0.8% in Q3 2011 to 0.4% in Q4 2011. We expect to see some improvement in the sequential growth trend going forward, though on a year-on-year basis GDP growth is still likely to remain modest at nearly 3% yoy in Q1 2012. An improved outlook on the US economy and better stability in the European sovereign debt situation have provided support to the weakness in the global economy. Koreas leading indicators, such as the manufacturing PMI and composite leading indicator index, have also demonstrated a pick-up from their trough in Q4 2011. With the external economy seemingly stabilized, we expect export growth to improve gradually in the months to come. Merchandise exports grew 8.2% yoy in December 2011 and moderated further to 6.7% yoy in January-February this year. We do not think the growth pace will fall much further in the near term. Better demand for technology exports coming from the developed world is expected to be the driver behind the improvement. But having said that, a slowing Chinese economy and its weakened demand for machinery and raw material imports are likely to create headwinds on Koreas non-tech export growth, in our view. Consumption growth is likely to remain moderate. (1) As an export-led economy, weakened external demand and facility investments in Korea are expected to limit employment and wage growth. (2) A high household debt level would limit the momentum for consumption and further appetite for loans. (3) A sluggish real estate market and volatile stock market are capping the wealth effects strength on the economy. We expect private consumption growth to remain modest at 3% yoy in 2012 versus 2.3% yoy in 2011. Fixed investment growth is likely to remain weak as well. (1) A moderate outlook on the external economy would likely limit the amount of facility investments carried out by corporations. (2) The reduction in Social Overhead Capital (SOC) budget in 2012 is likely to weaken public infrastructure investments. (3) A still sluggish real estate market may continue to put a cap on housing construction activities this year. We expect gross fixed capital formation growth to be at 3.2% in 2012, albeit improved from the very weak 2.1% contraction in 2011. 2012s growth is likely to be below-trend, but we do not think the government has the intention to provide strong stimulus support at this stage. We have maintained our 2012 GDP growth forecast at 3.4%, which is slower than the 4% trend growth seen over the past ten years. Although we think there is room for the government to provide stimulus to the economy, we do not think it is prepared to do so, unless the economy sees severe downside risk. Currently, the government is aiming to balance the managed fiscal account (exclude social security funds) by 2013 and to bring down gradually the public-debt-to-GDP ratio in the coming years. We now expect the Bank of Korea to keep the policy base rate unchanged at 3.25% through the end of 2012, in view of the tilt in inflation and growth risk balance in the economy. Growth is likely to remain slow, but we do not think it is likely to deteriorate much further at this juncture. In fact, the BoK has expressed its optimism about Koreas growth in the March monetary policy statement, saying that the domestic economy is not likely to weaken further. Meanwhile, rising global crude oil prices are causing heightened concern about inflation. According to the BoK, a $10 rise in the price for Dubai Fateh Crude oil is likely to add 0.2pp to the headline inflation rate. Inflation expectations remain high, with over 50% of the respondents expecting the headline inflation to pierce over 4% again in 12 months time.
115
14 March 2012
We expect the trade surplus to narrow in 2012, led by the moderation in exports, providing less support to the current account surplus. We expect merchandise exports to rise 14% yoy in 2012, slowed from the 19% yoy seen in 2011. Weak exports of electronics and cars are likely to be the driver, while the exports of final and intermediate products to China are likely to see a slowdown as well. We expect merchandise imports to grow 16% yoy this year, led by the slowdown in imports of raw materials and intermediate products for the export sector, and final products for domestic demand, though higher crude oil prices should inflate the import bill. We expect Koreas current account surplus to narrow to $21.5bn (1.8% of GDP) in 2012, still sizable to provide support to the balance of payment. The upside risk on USDKRW seems to have lessened, as the sovereign debt problem in Europe appears to have stabilized in the meantime. We maintain our expectation for USDKRW to be traded lower to around 1,030 by end-2012. This is under the assumption that the European condition would remain contained towards year-end and that the undervaluation of the KRW and continued current account surplus would increasingly compel KRW strength over H2 2012. A weakened JPY against the KRW is likely to erode the cost advantage Korean companies have over their Japanese competitors, but more visible impact on trade is not likely to be seen in the near term. We think the government will maintain a tightened fiscal stance, barring the need to respond to a severe growth shock, in preparation for rising challenges from a rapidly aging population. In the 2012 fiscal budget, the government projected a 9.4% increase in revenue (to KRW 344trn), but only a 5.5% increase in expenditure (to KRW 326trn). On the expenditure side, allocation to education, public administration, healthcare, welfare and other items saw increments, but allocation to infrastructure investments, also known as the Social Overhead Capital budget, was cut by 7.4%. The government has expressed its intention to balance the managed budget account next year and gradually reduce the ratio of its national debt to GDP to below 30% over the medium term. Household credit reached another record high to KRW 913trn by end-2011, over 150% of disposable income. The government has responded by introducing a series of policy measures in June last year to curtail the rapid rise of household debt, and the recent data suggest that its growth pace has slowed. However, we think the policies may only help to stabilize the household debt level; more stringent measures aiming to lower household leverages would negatively impact consumption demand. We are concerned that the continued sluggishness in the real estate market and resumption of the BoKs interest rate normalization process would aggravate the debt-servicing burden of the household sector. The voters choice for a conservative or liberal legislature and president this year would be important for Koreas politics in the years to come. The National Assembly election will be held on 11 April, while the presidential election will be held on 19 December. We believe domestic issues like a widening income gap, social welfare, and the balance between the big and small businesses will be the focus of this years elections There is a chance that the incumbent New World Party (formerly known as the Grand National Party) may narrow or even lose its majority in the National Assembly, as voters sentiment has been increasingly against the stance of the current administration. These elections may tilt the balance of governments policy towards the big businesses and social issues, in our view. Outlook for Koreas sovereign ratings appears stable. Adjustment remains unlikely over the next six months, in our view. Korea is currently rated A1 (Moodys), A (S&P) and A+ (Fitch), with a stable outlook.
116
14 March 2012
4Q11
2Q12
Industrial production has been weak, but may have reached its trough. Consumption and fixed investments are expected to stay weak in 2012.
30 20 10
Employment condition stayed resilient, but is likely to weaken this year. We now expect the BoK to remain on pause, in view of the tilt in inflation and growth risk balance.
1 0 -1 -2 -3 2002 Korea base rate (%) Korea real base rate (%) 2004 2006 2008 2010
2012
117
14 March 2012
Rising oil prices pose upside risk to CPI inflation. External trade remains weak, but should stabilize soon upon improved global condition.
Appreciation
USDKRW (inverted RHS)
70 60
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
The government has expressed its intention to gradually reduce the ratio of its national debt to GDP. We think more stringent measures aiming to lower household leverage would negatively affect consumption demand.
4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 2001
155
90
150 85 140
85
80
20 Forecast 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011E 2012F 15
120 75
110
70
118
14 March 2012
(1) Real effective exchange rate (CPI-deflated); increase indicates appreciation. (2) Include social security funds. (3) Scheduled amortizations of medium- and long-term external debt of both the public and private sectors. (4) Liabilities vis--vis non-residents (i.e., includes FX-denominated and local-currency debt). (5) Includes government and central bank. (6) Central bank forex reserves minus monetary authorities other liabilities. Source: Bank of Korea, National Statistical Office, Ministry of Strategy and Finance, CEIC, Credit Suisse
119
14 March 2012
We maintain our above consensus real GDP growth forecast of 4.8% for 2012 (consensus as of February: 3.9%). Real GDP growth surprised on the upside for the second consecutive quarter at the end of last year. The strong performance is in line with our view that Malaysias GDP growth will continue to outperform that of the other exportoriented economies in the region. High crude and palm oil prices, a further fiscal boost from the government (cash transfers to the poor and civil servant pay rises of 7%-13% in Q1), and higher investment from the Economic Transformation Programme should keep domestic demand strong, in our view. The recent improvement in US economic activity also bodes well for Malaysias exports. We expect the governments fiscal deficit to GDP ratio to remain stable at around 5.0% in 2012. The governments 2012 fiscal deficit projection of RM44bn (4.7% of GDP) was based on a real GDP growth forecast of 5.5% and oil price of $110/barrel. We think the governments growth forecast is optimistic. That said, we do not think the fiscal deficit will be a big issue under our assumption that Dubai oil prices remain at about $120/barrel in 2012. We estimate that every $10 rise in oil prices boosts the governments revenues by about RM3bn (0.3% of GDP). Total oil-related revenues, at around RM70bn (8.4% of GDP), remain well above the governments spending on oil subsidies of about RM16bn (1.7% of GDP) in 2011. We do not expect any change in subsidized fuel prices before the next general election, which must be held by March 2013. We expect Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) to keep the policy rate on hold for the rest of 2012. With inflation likely to fall to as low as 2% by mid-2012, BNM has room to cut the policy rate if needed. However, the pickup in global PMIs in recent months, still high crude oil and palm oil prices, and strong domestic credit growth support our view that BNM will keep the policy rate unchanged at 3% for the rest of 2012, barring a euro zone financial crisis or other major adverse growth shocks. BNM might increase its intervention to keep the ringgit from further outperformance. The ringgit has outperformed most Asian currencies so far this year. We noted in Malaysias Economy and Markets in 2012 (12 January 2012) that BNM might allow more ringgit appreciation in 2012, given that the current account surplus remains strong, domestic demand is resilient, and there are signs of a pickup in US economic activity. Malaysia also benefits from the positive terms of trade shocks from higher oil prices. In particular, we think demand for oil and gas from Japan is likely to remain high in the next few months as it is still uncertain when most of Japans nuclear reactors will restart. But, given that the MYR trade-weighted exchange rate is now nearly back to its recent peak in early 2010, BNM might intervene more to keep the ringgit from outperforming the other regional currencies much further in a risk-on environment. We think introduction of the minimum wage could have a significant effect on the economy. According to local news reports, the government approved the introduction of a national minimum wage for the first time at RM800-900 per month. This is about 12% higher than the governments survey of the poverty income line at RM760 ringgit per month and above the average gross pay that workers in the trade-reliant manufacturing sector receive, and about 34% of workers in the private sector earn less than RM700 per month. Although this measure might raise the governments popularity from lower income households who manage to keep their jobs, it would be negative for low value-added companies, while some workers are likely to lose their jobs unless they quickly manage to raise their productivity. Market uncertainty will likely rise ahead of the next election. The populist measures implemented in recent weeks suggest that the next general election might be near. Our base case remains that Prime Minister Najibs UMNO party will perform better than in the 2008 election but will fail to get back the two-thirds majority. Such an outcome should be mildly positive for the stock market. A recent survey by the Merdeka Center suggests that Najbis approval rating rose to 69% in February 2012 from 59% in August 2011. The prospects for further reforms will hinge crucially on the election outcome, in our view.
120
14 March 2012
10
4 0
-4
-5
ID MA PH KR HK TW SG
-8
Dec-03 Dec-05 Dec-07 Dec-09 Dec-11
Source: CEIC, Credit Suisse. *Malaysia and Indonesias GDP based on our own seasonally-adjusted data.
Jul-04
Jan-07
Jul-09
Jan-12
26
Commodities have been the main driver of export growth since the global financial crisis and have kept the trade balance in surplus.
21 16
5
11 6
Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12
0 -5
Dec-03 Dec-05 Dec-07 Dec-09 Dec-11
121
14 March 2012
The improvement in nonFDI capital flows more than offset a smaller current account surplus, keeping the overall balance of payments flows in surplus. Net FDI inflows were broadbased and should pick up further if the government continues to implement its reform program.
6 4 2 0 -2
Change in reserve assets Current account Net FDI Non-FDI capital flows Mar-05 Jun-07 Sep-09
Net direct investment flows Direct investment in Malaysia Direct investment abroad
-4 -6 -8
Dec-11
Dec-02 Dec-05 Dec-08 Dec-11
100 80 60 40 20 0
35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Dec-00 Dec-04 Dec-08 Dec-12
Dec-05
Dec-07
Dec-09
Dec-11
Dec-96
CPI inflation is likely to fall toward 2% yoy in the coming months, providing room for BNM to cut the policy rate if needed. But with domestic demand remaining strong and the global growth outlook improving, we expect BNM to keep the policy rate on hold at 3% for the rest of 2012. BNM may, however, intervene more to keep the MYR from outperforming much further, as the MYR trade-weighted exchange rate is nearly back to its recent peak.
122
14 March 2012
(1) Real GDP from 2001 has been rebased to 2000 = 100. (2) Real effective exchange rate, increase indicates appreciation. (3) Salaries and wages in the manufacturing sector. (4) BNM changed the policy rate from the intervention rate to the overnight rate in May 2004. (5) Refers to the federal governments financial position. The government assumed an oil price of $110 per barrel in its 2012 budget. (6) Not including forward FX purchases. Source: Bank Negara Malaysia, CEIC, Credit Suisse
123
14 March 2012
We are increasing our 2012 real GDP growth forecast to 3.5% from 3% earlier. The two key factors holding back growth last year exports and government spending have shown signs of turning around. Japanese PMI new order indicators, as well as semiconductor book to bill ratios, our preferred lead indicators for the Philippines exports, suggest that year-on-year export growth will bottom in 1Q. Assuming no full-blown European crisis, we expect export growth to pick up from 2Q onwards, supporting both GDP and the current account balance. We see improvements in the governments budget disbursement. We think the key tool for boosting growth is fiscal policy as the government is looking to put USD16bn (about 7% of GDP) in rail and airport projects. These planned expenditures form part of the governments spending plan, which it expects will produce a fiscal deficit of 2.6% of GDP this year (versus 2% last year). While we remain cautious about the execution of policy, we have seen some promising signs that the government can deliver the promised spending when it really wants to. Fiscal spending disbursements rose 43.2% year on year in December. Growth is still likely to be sub trend this year. The positive developments explained above have not removed all of the headwinds to GDP this year, in our view. The export recovery is likely to be slow, with sub trend growth in the Western world, and structural issues in the Philippines electronic exports (see Philippines: Growth fears, rate hopes, 12 January 2012). In terms of government spending, we are not expecting a large fiscal stimulus (after all, the primary balance is still likely to remain in surplus). The administrative bottlenecks in PPP projects have not gone away and the recent debate around changing the rules governing the mining sector will not help investors sentiment. As a result, our growth projection is still below consensus5. We are cutting our 2012 headline Inflation forecast to 3.2% yoy from 3.7% yoy earlier. The collapse in February inflation, which fell to the lowest rate since 2009, implies that 2012 average inflation is likely to be even lower than our below-consensus call. This development also bodes well for household real spending, as we have argued previously. While year-on-year inflation is likely to pick up in 2H, the speed of increase will depend largely on global oil prices as the government will not subsidize fuel prices. We think a Dubai oil price of around USD120 is still manageable for the BSP. The BSP is likely to stay put for the rest of this year. We maintain our expectation that the BSP will keep the policy rate at 4% going forward. The policy rate is already at its lowest level (the same as during the GFC) and the BSP governors recent statements sound more balanced, highlighting the upside risk to inflation from the higher oil price. We think the key tool for boosting growth is fiscal policy. The banking sector has plenty of liquidity in the system, as reflected by the PHP1.6trn in the central banks special deposit account (36% of broad money). We think what is needed to kick-start private investment is not cheaper credits, but a catalyst such as government investment. An upgrade to investment grade this year? The Philippines is rated two notches below investment grade by S&P and Moodys, and one step below by Fitch. The government expects its bonds to be upgraded to investment grade this year, and bonds rallied along with their Indonesian equivalents late last year. We think it quite possible that the countrys rating could be boosted, especially given that S&P put the country on positive outlook in December. However, we are more cautious about the prospect of achieving an investment grade rating this year. We think the country still needs to show that it can grow robustly while maintaining low inflation and fiscal discipline the improvement in the fiscal position that was achieved in 2011 was done so through under-spending at the expense of growth, rather than enhancing the ability to generate revenue, in our view.
124
14 March 2012
Consensus GDP
4.1% 3.8% 3.8% CS: 3.5%
30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15
40
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
CS
The governments accelerated spending plan has enabled it to increase the budget deficit to 2% of GDP. The government expects the budget deficit to reach 2.6% of GDP this year, but with the primary balance still in surplus.
Govt accelerated the spending plan after underspending for the most part of 2011
-2%
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
Assuming a Dubai oil price of USD120/bbl and that PHP remains at its current level, we think the pick up in inflation in 2H will be manageable. We maintain our view that the BSP will keep the policy rate at 4% for the rest of this year.
12 10 8 6 4 2 0
CPI inflation (% yoy) Dubai oil price in peso terms (% yoy, RHS) 110
f'cast
12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2005 2006
90 70 50 30 10 -10 -30
f'cast
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
125
14 March 2012
Excess liquidity in the system has pushed the market interest rate significantly below the policy rate. This is also reflected by the value of funds accumulating in the BSPs special deposit account reaching 35% of aggregate broad money.
SDA account/M2
1.6trn pesos
We expect growth in remittances to remain strong on the back of the better global growth outlook. Improvement in exports and robust remittance growth should result in a higher current account surplus this year.
In trade-weighted inflation adjusted terms, the PHP has appreciated more than its ASEAN peers over the years possibly one of the reasons behind loss of export competitiveness, in our view. The Philippines 10-year bond has rallied significantly since late last year, much like Indonesia, which achieved a rating upgrade to investment grade last year.
PH TH ID
SG MY
18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 Jan-07
2011
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 Jan-12
Jan-08
Jan-09
Jan-10
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Jan-11
126
14 March 2012
(1) Nominal minimum wage in non-agricultural sector. Figures from 2005 onwards also include cost of living allowance and daily equivalent of 13th month pay. (2) Real effective exchange rate, increase indicates appreciation. (3) 2007 number includes a large direct investment abroad in the amount of $2.7bn. (4) Not including forward FX purchases. Source: CEIC, Bangko Sentral Ng Pilipinas, Ministry of Finance, Credit Suisse
127
14 March 2012
We expect real GDP to expand 3.5% in 2012, higher than the governments forecast range of 1%-3%. Real GDP contracted 2.5% qoq annualized in Q4 (+3.6% yoy). Given that Singapore is highly leveraged to the global trade cycle, the recent improvement in PMIs in many parts of the world bodes well for Singapores growth. Similarly, the rise in the US semiconductor book-to-bill ratio suggests that electronic output should pick up in the coming months. Assuming the euro zone situation stabilizes, we think quarter-on-quarter real GDP growth, excluding the volatile biomedical sector, has already troughed, while year-on-year growth will bottom in Q1. The performance of the biomedical sector remains a key swing factor for Q1s sequential GDP. If biomedical production remains flat (i.e., no sequential growth or contraction) in February and March, it would rise 1% qoq in Q1 and contribute positively to Q1s real GDP growth. CPI inflation is likely to exceed the governments forecast range. CPI inflation remained high at 4.8% yoy in January. Moreover, the MAS core inflation measure, which excludes accommodation and private road transport, rose to 3.5% yoy, its highest since January 2009. Transport inflation is likely to rebound in coming months as COE (car license) prices hit a new high in the current cycle. Assuming COE and oil prices remain unchanged at current levels, we expect headline inflation to stay at around 5% in the rest of Q1 before falling below 4% yoy only in the second half of 2012. Our year-average inflation forecasts of 4.0% for headline and 3.0% for core are higher than the governments forecast of 2.5%-3.5% and 1.5%-2%, respectively, for 2012. Government spending should rise gradually as a share of GDP in coming years. The government expects the overall fiscal surplus to narrow modestly from an upwardly revised SGD2.3bn (0.7% of GDP) in FY2011 to SGD1.3bn (0.4% of GDP) in FY2012. This suggests that fiscal policy will be broadly neutral for the economy in 2012. The budget is focused more on medium-term issues, namely boosting labor productivity growth, improving infrastructure supply, and building an inclusive society, with particular focus on helping older people, lower-income families, and the disabled, through higher subsidies and work incentives. This suggests that the government is targeting a better balance between real GDP growth and the quality of living standards for the majority of Singaporeans. The labor market is likely to remain tight. The unemployment rate remained low at 2% in Q4, despite the weakness in growth in the second half of 2011. This supports the view that the tightness in the labor market is partly structural. High job vacancy levels, especially in the services sector, suggest that firms are having trouble meeting their labor demand. This is in line with recent surveys indicating that manpower shortages are among the top concerns for small and medium-sized enterprises, while the construction sector is facing the pinch of lower foreign worker inflows. In addition to the hikes in foreign worker levies that are in place, the government announced in its recent budget that it plans to reduce the dependency ratio ceilings (maximum proportion of foreign workers that companies can hire) for the manufacturing sector and services sector, as well as the entitlement quota for the construction sector. This should keep the labor market tight and should create wage pressure on the upside whenever global demand picks up. We expect the SGD trade-weighted exchange rate to remain on an appreciation trend. With both headline and core inflation likely to remain well above their historical averages in April (assuming no further supply-side shocks) and the labor market remaining tight (see Singapores Budget 2012: Lower potential growth near term? 17 February 2012), we think the most likely scenario remains that the MAS will keep the SGD NEER (tradeweighted exchange rate) on a mild appreciation trend of about 1%-2% per annum.
128
14 March 2012
Industrial production excluding the volatile biomedical sector rose for the second consecutive month in January. Businesses expect biomedical output to rebound modestly in Q1.
Jun-08
Sep-09
Dec-10
Mar-12
Singapore is among the most open economies in the world and is highly leveraged to the global trade cycle. The improvement in the global growth indicators in recent months bodes well for Singapores growth.
15 10 5 0 -5
Singapore real GDP (% yoy)
-10 -15
1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Source: CEIC, IMF, Credit Suisse. *World trade volume based on the IMFs latest forecast; Singapores real GDP growth based on our forecast.
Even though growth has stagnated since Q1 2011, unemployment remains low at around 2%. This suggests that the economy continues to operate near full capacity.
Dec-08
Dec-09
Dec-10
Dec-11
Dec-01
Jun-04
Dec-06
Jun-09
Dec-11
129
14 March 2012
6 4 2 0 -2
60 40 20 0 -20 -40
Dec-97
2011
Jun-01
Dec-04
Jun-08
Dec-11
8 6 4
The rise in COE (car license) prices should keep headline inflation high in the next few months. Core inflation rose to 3.5% yoy in January, and inflation momentum remained high on a seasonally adjusted month-on-month basis.
-0.4
Feb-04
Source: CEIC, Credit Suisse. *Excludes accommodation and private road transport.
We expect inflation to slow in the second half of 2012 as the surge in car prices drops out from the base. But both headline and core inflation are likely to remain above their historical averages and exceed the governments forecast range.
6 4 2 0 -2
Dec-02 Dec-04 Dec-06 Dec-08 Dec-10 Dec-12
Source: CEIC, Credit Suisse. *Excludes accommodation and private road transport.
130
14 March 2012
(1) Real effective exchange rate, increase indicates appreciation. (2) Operating revenue minus total expenditure. (3) Current account data were revised in early 2008, leading to a downward revision of around 6pp of GDP in the 2007 current account balance. The adjustment mostly reflected revisions to the income balance. (4) Not including forward FX purchases. Source: Monetary Authority of Singapore, CEIC, Credit Suisse
131
14 March 2012
Taiwan entered into a technical recession in 2H 2011. 4Q11 GDP growth was 1.89% yoy, much weaker than consensus and our estimate. On a quarter-on-quarter seasonally adjusted basis, GDP contracted 0.59% on an annualized basis, following the 0.2% contraction in 3Q11. This marked a technical recession for Taiwan, amid a sluggish global demand environment. Domestic demand was weak, deducting 2.88 percentage points (pp) from headline year-on-year growth. Net trade contributed 4.77pp, but it was led by a sharp decline in imports, which reflected weakened domestic demand. We have maintained our forecast for Taiwans GDP growth at 2.8% to reflect the slow global growth momentum anticipated for this year, but we reckon the upside risk to our projection posed by a stronger-than-expected US recovery. Signs of better growth in the US and stability in the European sovereign debt situation have prompted us to think that the trough for growth could have been reached. Recent US economic data have been surprising on the upside, posing upside surprise to the strength of its recovery. In Europe, the long-term refinancing operation (LTRO) conducted by the European Central Bank has helped to reduce the risk of a banking crisis. We draw comfort from the rapid improvement of Taiwans PMI, which rose to 52.7 in February, signifying the bottoming of this cyclical slowdown. Private consumption is expected to stay moderate in the coming quarters. In 4Q11, private consumption rose a mere 0.98% yoy, suppressed by a weak wealth effect, a sluggish external environment, and a higher base effect. Looking forward, a still resilient employment market is likely to be the support behind consumption, but as an export-led economy, moderate external demand and facility investments are still expected to limit consumer confidence and demand. Continued weakness in Taiwans commercial sales, which contracted 7.2% yoy and 2.1% mom, sa in January, supported our cautiousness on consumption momentum. We expect private consumption to grow 2.2% in 2012, compared to 2.95% in 2011. Fixed investment growth is likely to be limited in 2012, affected by the moderate external demand and slow government infrastructure projects. In 4Q11, private investments contracted 12.68% yoy, dragged down by contraction in machinery, construction, and transportation equipment investments. Public investments contracted as well, dragged down by slow progress on government projects. In 2012, we think moderate external demand should still limit the strength of facility investments, although investments into Taiwans tourism-related industry and ECFA benefited sectors are still expected to provide support. We expect fixed investments to grow 0.5% yoy in 2012, compared to a 3.8% yoy contraction in 2011. January export orders and industrial production contracted sharply yoy due to the Lunar New Year distortion, but rebounded visibly on a monthly sequential basis, suggesting that underlying momentum may not be that weak. Assuming that the governments seasonalized figures are reliable, Taiwans external demand and production activities could be turning the corner, in our view, emerging from the technical recession in 2H 2011. In the semiconductor sector, we think the utilization rates for foundry and back-end production are likely to bottom out in 1Q12. Prospects for better demand for tech products in the US may help to support order flows and production activities among Taiwanese manufacturers.
132
14 March 2012
Exports and imports contracted 4.5% yoy and 5.8% yoy in January-February, respectively, but we suspect the trough is about to be reached. The details showed that electronic exports, which represented 26.7% of January-February export flows, contracted 9% yoy, while information and communication equipment (-20.8% yoy) and plastics (-3.4% yoy) also dropped from a year ago. Geographically, exports to China/Hong Kong (about 37.8% of exports) fell 11.3% yoy, while exports to the US, Europe, and Japan contracted 6.5% yoy, 3.8% yoy, and 8.2% yoy, respectively. For imports, only mineral imports (+14.9% yoy), especially crude oil (+10.5% yoy), saw a yearly gain, while other items saw continued yearly contraction. The persistent weakness in machinery and intermediate goods imports reflects the sluggishness in manufacturing production and facility investments, in our view. Taiwans inflationary pressure remained muted, as evidenced by the moderate 1.3% yoy headline inflation rate in January-February. Core-CPI was up 0.9% YoY in January-February, also milder than Decembers. Rising global crude oil prices is an upside risk to Taiwans inflation, but we expect most of the direct pressure to be absorbed by the state-owned petroleum and power companies before being transmitted to the general public. Looking forward, we think weak domestic demand should keep inflationary pressure contained, although any adverse weather condition may cause spikes in fresh vegetable prices, given the mild statistical base in 2011. We now expect the Central Bank of China (CBC) to keep its policy rediscount rate unchanged through 2012, in view of the expected stabilization in the external and domestic economies. We believe the CBC may have become less concerned on growth and opted to remain on hold in the March monetary policy meeting. This is despite the muted inflationary pressure, as the central bank thinks that rates are at a very low level and that any further lowering might spur speculative pressure and encourage the build-up of leverage. Prospects for resumption of the rate normalization process remain unlikely in the near term, in our view, given the weakness in growth momentum and the lack of price and speculative pressure. Despite slower exports and a higher import bill for oil and fuel products, we expect Taiwans current account surplus to remain supported at $38.2bn (8% of GDP) in 2012. Taiwans concentration in high-technology exports exposes its trade flows to the cyclicality of world demand. But given the softness of its domestic demand strength, the economy has been able to maintain a sizable current account surplus, averaging 7.9% of GDP over the past ten years. We expect Taiwans current account surplus to narrow but to remain resilient in 2012, providing the fundamental support to the TWD. With external demand stabilizing but remaining slow, we think the CBCs FX policy will be geared to preventing excessive strengthening of the TWD. The expectation of a more stabilized European sovereign debt situation may reignite the appetite for risky assets in Asia, attracting capital inflows into the region Taiwan included. We maintain our view that the TWD will appreciate mildly to 29.2 by end-2012, upon an improved global and domestic economic outlook. We think the victory of President Ma Ying-Jeou and the KMT in the presidential and legislative elections in January has helped to maintain the consistency of existing government policies over the next four years. We think Taipei will continue to facilitate a rapprochement with Mainland China, maintaining stability in the cross-strait relationship. Pragmatically, we think the SEF and ARATS should negotiate further tariff reductions for each others imports, so that the items benefited would be expanded beyond those covered under the Early Harvest List. Furthermore, we think President Ma should also more forcefully push for FTAs with Taiwans key trading partners, such as the ASEAN bloc, the US, and the EU. These are very important steps for Taiwan to take to prevent marginalization under the rapid rise of FTAs among its competitors and trading partners, in our view. We do not expect changes in Taiwans ratings over the next six months. Taiwan is currently rated at Aa3 (Moodys), AA- (S&P) and A+ (Fitch), with a stable outlook.
Emerging Markets Quarterly
133
14 March 2012
10 8 6 4 2 0 -2
40 20 0 -20 -40
Taiwan entered into a technical recession in 2H 2011. Domestic demand was weak, deducting 2.88 percentage points from headline year-on-year growth.
4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2
2009
2010
2Q09
3Q09
4Q09
2Q10
3Q10
4Q10
2011
2Q11
3Q11
4Q11
-4
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Feb-10
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
Taiwans external demand condition and production activities could be turning the corner, in our view, emerging from the technical recession in 2H 2011.
2011
134
14 March 2012
6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 05
30 20 10 0 -10 -20
5 4
3 2 1 0
2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
USDTWD
Taiwan needs to catch up on reaching FTAs to maintain its external trade competitiveness. This is to prevent Taiwan from becoming marginalized under the rapid rise of FTAs among its competitors and trading partners.
Note: Red Signatory of FTA with selected country/territory; Green Non-signatory of FTA, but WTO member; Grey Non-signatory of FTA and non WTO member. Source: WTO, Credit Suisse Note: Red Signatory of FTA with selected country/territory; Green Non-signatory of FTA, but WTO member; Grey Non-signatory of FTA and non WTO member. Source: WTO, Credit Suisse
135
14 March 2012
(1) Real effective exchange rate (CPI-deflated), increase indicates appreciation. (2) General government statistics as interpreted by the Taiwan government. (3) Scheduled amortizations of medium- and long-term external debt of both the public and private sectors. (4) Liabilities vis--vis non-residents (i.e., includes FX-denominated and local-currency debt). (5) Includes government and central bank. (6) Central bank forex reserves minus monetary authorities other liabilities. Source: Directorate-general of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Central Bank of China, Ministry of Finance, CEIC, Credit Suisse
136
14 March 2012
We are adjusting our 2012 real GDP growth forecast up to 4.5% from 3.8%, albeit purely for technical reasons and taking into account the Q4 2011 disappointment. Our projected level of GDP remains the same. The 2011 full-year GDP growth of 0.1% was significantly below virtually everyones estimate of around 1%. Assuming the same path of recovery, with the flood-related fall in the level of output being fully restored by end Q2, this implies that the year-on-year growth rate has to be higher this year to account for the lower base. The BoT has said it will increase its forecast (from 4.9%) for the same reason. The underlying story remains the same. We maintain our view that, despite a brief initial rebound, private consumption will be the main laggard in H1 due to the significant damage to wealth, incomes, and confidence from the floods. This is one of the key reasons why we are still more cautious than the government and the market on GDP. The floods have pushed infrastructure investment higher up the governments agenda. The governments planned capital expenditure (including the THB300bn water management investment) implies a doubling of investment expenditure this fiscal year to 4%-5% of GDP. This means that the effective budget deficit that includes the off-budget items will likely increase to 4%-5% (from the official figure of 3.6%). This, together with our view that households will be spending more on residential investment, underpins our above-consensus investment growth forecast6. We expect better GDP growth prints in H2 and 2013. We remain cautious on the speed of implementing this infrastructure spending both due to the nature of the plans and the governments track record (see Thailand's post flood recovery: Turning the tide, 13 February 2012). This is why we expect healthy GDP prints to come later in H2 2012 and 2013. As a result, we are also revising up our 2013 GDP forecast to 5% from 4.6%. Oil prices remain a key risk to growth and inflation. Thailand is one of the most oilintensive economies and the largest net oil importer in the region (as a percentage of GDP). For now, year-on-year oil price inflation is still contained due to the high base last year and excise duty cuts that have kept the diesel price 20% lower than it would have been. Our assumptions are that 1) the Dubai oil price will fluctuate around USD120bbl; and 2) the government will do everything in its power to keep the diesel price contained. We estimate that, at current global oil prices, the extension of excise duty exemption on diesel until the end of September (the end of the fiscal year) will cost the government around 0.5pp of GDP, roughly equal to the savings it made from transferring the interest burden on the debt legacy from the Asian financial crisis to the BoT. We maintain our 2012 average inflation forecast at 3.3%. Assuming that the government continues to contain the diesel price and the Dubai oil price stays at its current level, we think that inflation will fall sharply by April and the pick-up in H2 will be relatively modest, thanks to the slack in the economy. Inflation will become more of an issue in 2013, and we are raising our 2013 average inflation forecast to 3.7% from 3.2%. We still see a good chance that the BoT will cut another 25bps. Given our assumptions above, we think the likely fall in core inflation and potential growth disappointment should prompt the BoT to cut rates further to 2.75% in Q2. The central bank will probably then shift to rate rises early next year to contain inflation pressure. Our strategists are still moderately bearish on the baht and expect more steepening in the yield curve. Disruptions to exports and higher import demand from investment spending should squeeze the current account surplus, while data on approved FDI do not point to a major pick-up in direct investment flows. For bonds, the pressure on the government to support growth will likely add to fiscal risks and lead to increased issuance. The prospect of fiscal slippage should also keep long bonds weak.
11.9% yoy versus the market expectation of 6.7% as per the February issue of Consensus Economics.
137
14 March 2012
Private consumption has led the bounce back from the floods as expected, but going forward we think investment growth momentum will be stronger than consumption. Survey-based indicators suggest business sentiment is back to its pre-flood level while consumer confidence in the economy is still near its all-time low.
-20
75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30
2010
2011
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
2012
60 50 40 30 20
80% 75%
0 2012F
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011F
138
14 March 2012
Overall approved FDI value was flat in 2011 as the decline in electronics FDI offset the increase in the metal and machinery (including automobiles) category. We expect a smaller current account surplus this year on increased import demand.
30 25 20 15
0%
10 5 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011F -5 2012F
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
-10
Source: CEIC, Credit Suisse
The Thai economy is the most exposed NJA economy to the rise in oil prices since it is an oilintensive economy and a large net importer of oil.
More exposed ID IN PH HK
MY CN
TW KR TH
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
Assuming that the government continues to contain the diesel price and the Dubai oil price stays at its current level, we think overall inflation will be relatively manageable. Under this assumption, the likely fall in core inflation and GDP growth disappointment should trigger another 25bps cut in the policy rate.
139
14 March 2012
(1) Real effective exchange rate, increase indicates appreciation. (2) From Labor Force Survey: Average Monthly Wage in the private sector. (3) Through 2006, the policy rate was the 14-day repo rate. (4) Data for central government, based on cash basis prior to 2004, based on fiscal year ending September. (5) Includes central government, non-financial SOEs and financial institution development fund. (6) Not including forward FX purchases. Source: Bank of Thailand, National Economic & Social Development Board, CEIC, Credit Suisse
140
14 March 2012
Moody's LATIN AMERICA Argentina Brazil Chile Colombia Mexico Panama Peru Venezuela B3 Baa2 (pos) Aa3 Baa3 Baa1 Baa3 (pos) Baa3 (pos) B2
S&P B (u) (1) BBB A+ (pos) BBBBBB BBB- (pos) BBB B+ AABB+ (neg) A+ BBB+ ABBB AABBB+ BB (pos) B+
Fitch B BBB A+ BBBBBB BBB BBB B+ A+ BBB+ (neg) A BBB (pos) ABBB AABBB+ (neg) BB+ B
EASTERN EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA Czech Republic A1 Hungary Ba1 (neg) Israel A1 Kazakhstan(2) Baa1 Poland A2 Russia Baa1 Saudi Arabia Aa3 South Africa A3 (neg) Turkey Ba2 (pos) Ukraine B2 (neg) United Arab Emirates Aa2 EMERGING ASIA China Hong Kong India Indonesia Korea Malaysia Philippines Singapore Taiwan Thailand Aa3 (pos) Aa1 (pos) Baa3 Baa3 A1 A3 Ba2 Aaa Aa3 Baa1 Moody's rating scale Investment grade Aa1 Aa2 Aa3 A1 A2 A3 Baa1 Baa2 Baa3 Subinvestment grade Ba1 Ba2 Ba3 B1 B2 B3 Caa1
AAAAA BBBBB+ (pos) A ABB (pos) AAA AABBB+ S&P rating scale Investment grade AAA AA AAA+ A ABBB+ BBB BBBSubinvestment grade BB+ BB BBB+ B BCCC+
A+ AA+ BBBBBBA+ (pos) ABB+ AAA A+ BBB Fitch rating scale Investment grade AAA AA AAA+ A ABBB+ BBB BBBSubinvestment grade BB+ BB BBB+ B BCCC+
(1) u denotes unsolicited. (2) The Moodys rating in the table refers to the country ceiling. Moodys foreign currency issuer rating is one notch lower. Source: Standard & Poors, Moodys and Fitch
141
S&P
AA Kuwait Qatar
BBB Bahrain Brazil Bulgaria Lithuania Mexico Peru Russia Bahrain Brazil Kazakhstan + Lithuania Mexico Panama Peru Russia Thailand
Fitch
Kuwait
Saudi Arabia
Israel Slovenia
Malaysia Poland
South Africa
Baa3 Colombia Croatia India Indonesia Latvia + Panama + Peru + Romania Tunisia BBBAzerbaijan Colombia Croatia India Morocco Panama + Tunisia Uruguay Azerbaijan + Bulgaria Colombia Croatia Cyprus India Indonesia Latvia Morocco Romania Tunisia
Sub-Investment Grade
Moodys
S&P
Fitch
Ba1 Azerbaijan + Cyprus Hungary Morocco Uruguay + BB+ Cyprus Hungary Indonesia + Latvia + Romania Hungary Philippines Turkey Uruguay
Ba3
B1 Lebanon Sri Lanka + Vietnam B+ Nigeria + Sri Lanka Ukraine Venezuela Ghana Venezuela Vietnam
B2 Egypt Ukraine Venezuela B Argentina Egypt Ghana Lebanon Argentina Lebanon Ukraine
BBEl Salvador Gabon Vietnam Egypt Gabon Nigeria Serbia Sri Lanka
(1) The Moodys rating in the table refers to the country ceiling. Moodys foreign currency issuer rating is one notch lower. (2) The S&P rating in the table refers to the rating for the foreign currency sovereign bonds. S&Ps foreign currency rating is one notch lower. Source: Standard & Poors, Moodys & Fitch + Outlook positive Outlook negative No sign indicates stable outlook
14 March 2012
142
14 March 2012
Key websites
GENERAL WEBSITES
Central bank websites Central bank websites National statistical offices Finance ministry websites Global election calendar www.zagury.com/cbanks.htm www.centralbanking.co.uk/links unstats.un.org www.centralbanking.co.uk/links/mof.htm www.electionguide.org
BRAZIL
Central Bank Statistics Office Ministry of Finance National Treasury Brazilian Federal Revenue Service Development, Industry and Trade Ministry Planning Ministry Economic Research Official Bureau News sources www.bcb.gov.br www.ibge.gov.br www.fazenda.gov.br www.tesouro.fazenda.gov.br www.receita.fazenda.gov.br www.mdic.gov.br www.planejamento.gov.br www.ipea.gov.br www.valoronline.com.br www.estadao.com.br www.folha.com.br www.oglobo.com www.ibre.fgv.br
CHILE
Central Bank Office of the President Ministry of Finance and Office of the Budget Statistical Office Pension Fund Regulator News sources National Emergencies Office / Ministry of the Interior www.bcentral.cl www.gobiernodechile.cl www.hacienda.cl www.dipres.cl www.ine.cl www.safp.cl www.latercera.cl www.emol.com www.elmercurio.cl www.df.cl www.onemi.cl
COLOMBIA
Central Bank Ministry of Finance Statistical Office News sources www.banrep.gov.co www.minhacienda.gov.co www.dane.gov.co www.elpais.com.co www.elespectador.com www.eltiempo.com www.larepublica.com.co www.portafolio.com.co
ECUADOR
Central Bank Ministry of Finance Statistical Office News sources
Source: Credit Suisse
www.bce.fin.ec www.mef.gov.ec www.inec.gob.ec www.eluniverso.com www.elcomercio.com www.lahora.com.ec www.vistazo.com www.hoy.com.ec www.diario-expreso.com www.elmercurio.com.ec
143
14 March 2012
Key websites
LATIN AMERICA (contd) EL SALVADOR
Central Bank Finance Ministry Legislative Assembly Bank Superintendence News Sources www.bcr.gob.sv www.mh.gob.sv www.asamblea.gob.sv www.ssf.gob.sv www.elsalvador.com www.laprensagrafica.com www.elmundo.com.sv www.elfaro.net
MEXICO
Central Bank Office of the President Ministry of Finance Federal Electoral Institute Ministry of Energy Statistical Office Pension Fund Regulator Pemex Pollsters News sources www.banxico.org.mx www.presidencia.gob.mx www.shcp.gob.mx www.ife.org.mx www.energia.gob.mx www.inegi.org.mx www.consar.gob.mx www.pemex.com www.consulta.mx www.parametria.com.mx www.buendiaylaredo.com www.ipsos-bimsa.com.mx www.elfinanciero.com.mx www.eluniversal.com.mx www.reforma.com www.milenio.com www.economista.com.mx www.cronica.com.mx www.excelsior.com.mx www.jornada.unam.mx www.radioformula.com.mx
PANAMA
Ministry of Finance Statistical Office Bank Superintendence National Assembly Pollster News sources www.mef.gob.pa www.contraloria.gob.pa/inec www.superbancos.gob.pa www.asamblea.gob.pa/main www.dichter-neira.com/encuesta_opinion.php www.prensa.com www.laestrella.com.pa
PERU
Central Bank Ministry of Finance Statistical Office New sources www.bcrp.gob.pe www.mef.gob.pe www.inei.gob.pe www.elcomercioperu.pe www.gestion.pe www.larepublica.pe www. diariocorreo.pe
URUGUAY
Central Bank Office of the President Ministry of Finance Statistical Office News sources www.bcu.gub.uy www.presidencia.gub.uy www.dgi.gub.uy www.ine.gub.uy www.observador.com.uy www.lr21.com.uy www.brecha.com.uy www.espectador.com
VENEZUELA
Central Bank Ministry of Finance Statistical Office Budget Office National Electoral Commission National Foreign Exchange Administration National Tax and Customs Administration National Public Credit Office PDVSA News sources
Source: Credit Suisse
www.bcv.org.ve www.mf.gov.ve www.ine.gov.ve www.ocepre.gov.ve www.cne.gov.ve www.cadivi.gob.ve www.seniat.gob.ve www.oncp.gob.ve www.pdvsa.com www.el-nacional.com www.eluniversal.com www.unionradio.net www.avn.info.ve
144
14 March 2012
Key websites
EASTERN EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CZECH REPUBLIC
Czech National Bank Czech Statistical Office Ministry of Finance Parliament News sources www.cnb.cz www.czso.cz www.mfcr.cz www.psp.cz www.radio.cz www.praguepost.com
EGYPT
Central Bank of Egypt Finance Ministry Statistics Office News sources www.cbe.org.eg www.mof.gov.eg www.capmas.gov.eg www.businesstodayegypt.com english.ahram.org.eg www.almasryalyoum.com/en
GCC
Central Bank of Kuwait Ministry of Finance Kuwait Qatar Central Bank Ministry of Finance Qatar Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency Ministry of Finance Saudi Arabia Central Bank of the UAE Ministry of Finance and Industry UAE News sources GCC www.cbk.gov.kw www.mof.gov.kw www.qcb.gov.qa www.mof.gov.qa www.sama.gov.sa www.mof.gov.sa/en www.centralbank.ae www.mofi.gov.ae www.arabianbusiness.com
HUNGARY
National Bank of Hungary Website of the Hungarian Government Ministry for National Economy Debt Management Agency Central Statistical Office Parliament Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority News sources www.mnb.hu www.kormany.hu www.ngm.gov.hu www.allampapir.hu www.ksh.hu www.parlament.hu www.pszaf.hu www.budapesttimes.hu www.portfolio.hu
ISRAEL
Central Bank of Israel Central Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Finance Israel Securities Authority News sources www.bankisrael.gov.il www.cbs.gov.il govx.mof.gov.il www.isa.gov.il www.haaretz.com www.globes.co.il
KAZAKHSTAN
National Bank of Kazakhstan Ministry of Finance Statistical Agency Ministry of Economy and Budget Planning Financial Services Supervisory Agency Official site of the president News sources
Source: Credit Suisse
145
14 March 2012
Key websites
EASTERN EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA (contd) NIGERIA
Central Bank of Nigeria Ministry of Finance Debt Management Office Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation News sources www.cenbank.org www.fmf.gov.ng www.dmo.gov.ng www.nnpcgroup.com www.thisdayonline.com www.allafrica.com
POLAND
National Bank of Poland Ministry of Finance Central Statistical Office Polish Financial Supervision Authority Parliament News sources www.nbp.pl www.mf.gov.pl www.stat.gov.pl www.knf.gov.pl www.sejm.gov.pl www thenews.pl www.polandmonthly.pl www.warsawvoice.pl
ROMANIA
Central Bank Statistics Office Ministry of Finance www.bnr.ro www.insse.ro www.mfinante.ro
RUSSIA
Central Bank of Russia Finance Ministry State Statistics Agency Economic Expert Group The State Duma News sources www.cbr.ru www.minfin.ru www.gks.ru www.eeg.ru www.duma.ru www.themoscowtimes.com
SOUTH AFRICA
South African Reserve Bank National Treasury Statistics South Africa South Africa Revenue Services Bureau for Economic Research Bond Exchange of South Africa Johannesburg Stock Exchange News sources www.reservebank.co.za www.treasury.gov.za www.statssa.gov.za www.sars.gov.za www.ber.sun.ac.za www.bondexchange.co.za www.jse.co.za www.businessday.co.za www.mg.co.za www.financialmail.co.za www.thestar.co.za
TURKEY
Central Bank Treasury Ministry of Finance State Planning Organization State Institute of Statistics News sources www.tcmb.gov.tr www.treasury.gov.tr www.maliye.gov.tr www.dpt.gov.tr www.tuik.gov.tr www.ntvmsnbc.com.tr www.turkishdailynews.com.tr
UKRAINE
National Bank of Ukraine Finance Ministry Economy Ministry State Statistics Agency News sources
Source: Credit Suisse
146
14 March 2012
Key websites
EMERGING ASIA CHINA
Central Bank Statistics Office Ministry of Finance News sources www.pbc.gov.cn/english www.stats.gov.cn www.mof.gov.cn www.chinadaily.com english.peopledaily.com.cn www.xinhuanet.com
HONG KONG
Central Bank Statistics Office Treasury Department News sources www.info.gov.hk/hkma www.info.gov.hk/censtatd www.try.gov.hk www.scmp.com www.thestandard.com.hk www.feer.com
INDIA
Central Bank Ministry of Finance Government press releases Ministry of Statistics Ministry of Commerce & Industry www.rbi.org.in finmin.nic.in www.pib.nic.in www.mospi.nic.in www.commerce.nic.in
INDONESIA
Central Bank Investment Coordinating Board News sources www.bi.go.id www.bkpm.go.id www.thejakartapost.com www.antara.co.id
KOREA
Central Bank Statistics Office Ministry of Finance News sources www.bok.or.kr www.nso.go.kr/eng www.mocie.go.kr english.mofe.go.kr times.hankooki.com english.chosun.com www.koreaherald.co.kr www.koreapost.com www.theseoultimes.com english.yna.co.kr joongangdaily.joins.com english.donga.com english.yna.co.kr
MALAYSIA
Central Bank Ministry of Finance Department of Statistics News sources www.bnm.gov.my www.treasury.gov.my/englishversionbaru www.statistics.gov.my thestar.com.my www.nst.com.my www.bernama.com www.theedgedaily.com
PHILIPPINES
Central Bank National Statistics Office Department of Finance Department of Budget and Management News sources www.bsp.gov.ph www.census.gov.ph www.dof.gov.ph www.dbm.gov.ph www.bworld.com.ph www.inq7.net www.gmanews.tv/business
SINGAPORE
Central Bank Department of Statistics Department of Finance News sources
Source: Credit Suisse
147
14 March 2012
Key websites
EMERGING ASIA (contd) TAIWAN
Central Bank Statistics Offices Ministry of Finance News sources www.cbc.gov.tw eng.dgbas.gov.tw eng.stat.gov.tw www.moea.gov.tw www.cepd.gov.tw www.mof.gov.tw www.taipeitimes.com www.chinapost.com.tw www.taiwanheadlines.com www.etaiwannews.com news.cens.com www.cna.com.tw taiwansnews.net
THAILAND
Central Bank National Statistical Office Ministry of Finance News sources www.bot.or.th www.nso.go.th www2.mof.go.th www.nationmultimedia.com www.bangkokpost.net
VIETNAM
Vietnam Economic News Ministry of Finance World Bank in Vietnam Vietnam Economic Portal
Source: Credit Suisse
148
14 March 2012
Previous publications
From Credit Suisses Economics Team since the last Emerging Markets Quarterly
BRAZIL
08 Mar 2012 Brazil: We stick with the flattener, I. Arsenin 07 Mar 2012 Brazil: We now expect the Selic rate to reach 8.5% at the end of May , N. Teixeira, I. Ferrao, L. Fonseca, D. Lavarda, T. Rabelo 06 Mar 2012 Brazil: We maintain our forecast for GDP growth of 2.5% in 2012 , N. Teixeira, I. Ferrao, L. Fonseca, D. Lavarda, T. Rabelo 29 Feb 2012 Brazil: Brazil's vulnerability increased only slightly with rise in external debt, N. Teixeira, I. Ferrao, L. Fonseca, D. Lavarda, T. Rabelo 22 Feb 2012 Brazil: Put on Jan '14 to Jan '17 PRE-CDI flattener, I. Arsenin 15 Feb 2012 Brazil: We maintain our forecast of a reduction in the unemployment rate in 2012 and 2013, N. Teixeira, I. Ferrao, L. Fonseca, D. Lavarda, T. Rabelo 07 Feb 2012 Brazil: We project GDP growth of 0.2% qoq in 4Q11, N. Teixeira, I. Ferrao, L. Fonseca, D. Lavarda, T. Rabelo 03 Feb 2012 Brazil: Budget cuts of R$60bn would greatly increase the probability of our scenario of a primary surplus of 3.1% of GDP in 2012, N. Teixeira, I. Ferrao, L. et. al 01 Feb 2012 Brazil: Rise in the weight of services under the new IPCA classification, N. Teixeira, I. Ferrao, L. Fonseca, D. Lavarda, T.Rabelo 31 Jan 2012 Brazil: Extend duration on NTNB curve, I. Arsenin 26 Jan 2012 Brazil: We still expect 150bps in additional rate cuts in 2012, N. Teixeira, I. Ferrao, L. Fonseca, D. Lavarda, T. Rabelo 22 Dec 2011 Brazil: We still expect an aggregate interest rate cut of 200bps in 2012, N. Teixeira, I. Ferrao, L. Fonseca, D. Lavarda, T. Rabelo 01 Dec 2011 Brazil 2012/13: Slowdown in activity and above-target inflation in an uncertain global environment, N. Teixeira, I. Ferrao, L. Fonseca, D. Lavarda, T. Rabelo
Source: Credit Suisse
149
14 March 2012
Previous publications
From Credit Suisses Economics Team since the last Emerging Markets Quarterly
CHILE
09 Mar 2012 Chile: Long CLP versus COP in six-month NDF, A. Cervera, D. Chodos, I. Arsenin, C. Sandy 08 Mar 2012 Chile & Mexico: Our take on todays inflation reports, A. Cervera 29 Feb 2012 Chile: Room for an extended pause in the easing cycle, A. Cervera, C. Reckman 23 Feb 2012 Chile: Pension fund snapshot as of January 2012, A. Cervera, C. Reckman 31 Jan 2012 Chile: Where is the slowdown?, A. Cervera, C. Reckman 12 Jan 2012 Chile: Easing too soon?, A. Cervera, C. Reckman 11 Jan 2012 Chile: Pension fund snapshot as of end-2011, A. Cervera, C. Reckman 10 Jan 2012 Chile: Unwind long breakeven inflation trade , A. Cervera, D. Chodos, I. Arsenin, C. Reckman 10 Jan 2012 Chile: Monetary policy preview, A. Cervera, C. Reckman 09 Jan 2012: Chile: What drove inflation in 2011?, A. Cervera, C. Reckman 03 Jan 2012 Chile: Holiday recap, A. Cervera, C. Reckman 08 Dec 2011 Chile: Not a worrisome slowdown until now, A. Cervera
COLOMBIA
27 Feb 2012 Colombias central bank: Up another 25bps, C. Sandy 23 Feb 2012 Colombia monetary policy preview: Another hike is likely, C. Sandy 23 Feb 2012 Colombia: Keep 2s10s IBR flattener positions, I. Arsenin, D. Chodos, C. Sandy 22 Feb 2012 Colombia: Growth still robust; peso likely to strengthen further, C. Sandy 07 Feb 2012 Colombia: Waiting for better entry levels to short the COP, I. Arsenin, D. Chodos, C. Sandy 06 Feb 2012 Colombia - Central bank will resume its daily dollar purchases; January CPI up 0.73% mom, C. Sandy 31 Jan 2012 Colombias central bank: an unexpected rate hike, C. Sandy 27 Jan 2012 Colombia: Monetary policy preview, C. Sandy 18 Jan 2012 Colombia: Unwind receiver in 1-year IBR swap rates, D. Chodos, C. Sandy 04 Jan 2012 Colombia: An update of our views about the economy, C. Sandy 08 Dec 2011 Colombia: Growth may hit speed bump, C. Sandy
MEXICO
13 Mar 2012 Mexico: Long FX carry and 2s-10s steepeners, A. Cervera, I. Arsenin 08 Mar 2012 Mexico and Chile: Our take on todays inflation reports, A. Cervera 06 Mar 2012 Mexico: Steepeners remain our top trade, A. Cervera, I. Arsenin 02 Mar 2012 Mexico: Afores are stronger hands for Bonos in 2012, A. Cervera, I. Arsenin 01 Mar 2012 Mexico: Highlights from the central banks survey, A. Cervera 23 Feb 2012 Mexico: Inflation in early February was below market estimates, A. Cervera 17 Feb 2012 Mexico: Whats the front-runner thinking?, A. Cervera, I. Arsenin 15 Feb 2012 Mexico: Our take on Banxicos inflation report, A. Cervera 10 Feb 2012 Mexico: The week ahead, A. Cervera 10 Feb 2012 Mexico: How do voter preferences look right now, A. Cervera, I. Arsenin 09 Feb 2012 Mexico: January inflation slightly higher than expected, A. Cervera 08 Feb 2012 Mexico: Inflation preview, A. Cervera 03 Feb 2012 Mexico: More doves than hawks? You decide, A. Cervera, I. Arsenin 31 Jan 2012 Mexico: Put on 2s-10s TIIE steepener, A. Cervera, I. Arsenin 30 Jan 2012 Mexico: What to do in the local market? A. Cervera, I. Arsenin 25 Jan 2012 Mexico: Our take on Tuesdays data releases, A. Cervera 20 Jan 2012 Mexico: Next step, adopt an easing bias, A. Cervera, I. Arsenin
Source: Credit Suisse
150
14 March 2012
Previous publications
From Credit Suisses Economics Team since the last Emerging Markets Quarterly 20 Jan 2012 Mexico: A neutral bias, thats not so neutral to us, A. Cervera 19 Jan 2012 Mexico: Monetary policy preview and inflation estimates, A. Cervera 18 Jan 2012 Mexico: Receive 2-year TIIE, A. Cervera, I. Arsenin 17 Jan 2012 Mexico: Pension fund snapshot December 2011, A. Cervera 13 Jan 2012 Mexico: What to expect from Banxico next Friday?, A. Cervera, I. Arsenin 12 Jan 2012 Mexico: Local markets snapshot as of December 2011, A. Cervera 11 Jan 2012 Mexico: Weak IP and vehicle output data to close 2011, A. Cervera 10 Jan 2012 Mexico: Earn the carry in 3-month Cetes funded in FX forwards. A. Cervera, I. Arsenin 10 Jan 2012 Mexico: Election update, A. Cervera 09 Jan 2012 Mexico: Inflation was higher than expected in December, A. Cervera 09 Jan 2012 Mexico: 2011 inflation under the microscope, A. Cervera 06 Jan 2012 Mexico: A roadmap to the presidential elections, A. Cervera 03 Jan 2012 Mexico: Holiday recap. A. Cervera 16 Dec 2011 Mexico: Hawks versus doves, A. Cervera, I. Arsenin 08 Dec 2011 Mexico: So far, not so bad, A. Cervera
PERU
09 Mar 2012 Perus central bank: No need for rate cuts yet (or, perhaps, at all), C. Sandy 06 Mar 2012 Peru: Monetary policy preview, C. Sandy 01 Mar 2012 Peru: CPI up 0.32% mom in February, C. Sandy 16 Feb 2012 Peru: GDP proxy 6% yoy in December; 6.9% for full-year 2011, C. Sandy 09 Feb 2012 Perus central bank: No change in the policy stance yet, C. Sandy 08 Feb 2012 Peru: Central bank likely to leave policy rate unchanged at 4.25%, C. Sandy 01 Feb 2012 Peru: CPI down 0.1% mom in January, C. Sandy 18 Jan 2012 Peru: Go long short-dated Soberanos bonds, D. Chodos, C. Sandy 12 Jan 2012 Perus central bank: Still on hold, as expected, C. Sandy 11 Jan 2012 Perus central bank: Unlikely to change its policy stance yet, C. Sandy 04 Jan 2012 Peru: Economic and political update, C. Sandy 08 Dec 2011 Peru: A challenging socio-political environment, C. Sandy
VENEZUELA
22 Feb 2012 Venezuela: Keep long positions on Venezuelan bonds; I. Arsenin. D. Chodos, C. Reckman 21 Feb 2012 Venezuela: President Chavez to undergo another operation, C. Reckman 13 Feb 2012 Venezuela: Landslide Capriles victory in primary should boost opposition campaign, C. Reckman 09 Feb 2012 Venezuela: Trip notes, I. Arsenin, C. Reckman 08 Feb 2012 Venezuela: Opposition primary outlook, C. Reckman 01 Feb 2012 Venezuela: SITME Snapshot, I .Arsenin, C. Reckman 02 Jan 2012 Venezuela: Holiday recap, C. Reckman 08 Dec 2011 Venezuela: Re-election or bust, C. Reckman
Source: Credit Suisse
151
14 March 2012
Previous publications
From Credit Suisses Economics Team since the last Emerging Markets Quarterly
CZECH REPUBLIC
16 Feb 2012 Czech Republic: VAT hike pushed inflation up in January, G. Hudecz 13 Feb 2012 Czech Republic: FDI inflows resilient, G. Hudecz 09 Jan 2012 Czech Republic: Weak koruna remains an upside risk to inflation, G. Hudecz 21 Dec 2011 Czech Republic: CNB board turning hawkish?, G. Hudecz
EGYPT
16 Feb 2012 Egypt: In need of IMF support, N. Mustafayev
HUNGARY
13 Mar 2012 Hungary: Headline inflation moved higher in February but the run-rate of core inflation moderated, G. Hudecz 09 Mar 2012 Hungary vs. European Commission: The saga continues, G. Hudecz 28 Feb 2012 Hungary: Time of the doves approaching?, G. Hudecz 22 Feb 2012 Hungary: European Commission proponed to suspend 0.5bn in cohesin funds from 2013, G. Hudecz 17 Feb 2012 Hungary: Take profits on long positions against SovX CEEMEA, S. Siddiqui, G. Hudecz 14 Feb 2012 Hungary: Pick-up in inflation driven by VAT hike in January, G. Hudecz 06 Feb 2012 Hungary: Government willing to compromise on economic policy, G. Hudecz 25 Jan 2012 Hungary: The IMF recommends that the government identify contingency measures, G. Hudecz 24 Jan 2012 Hungary: Policy rate on hold, waiting for an IMF program, G. Hudecz 17 Jan 2012 Hungary: The EC launched infringement proceedings, G. Hudecz 13 Jan 2012 Hungary: December inflation surprised on the downside, G. Hudecz 05 Jan 2012 Hungary: Waiting for the European Commissions view on the central bank law, G. Hudecz 20 Dec 2011 Hungary: Policy rate hike amidst uncertainty about central bank law and IMF talks, G. Hudecz 13 Dec 2011 Hungary: Inflation continued to rise in November, G. Hudecz
ISRAEL
27 Feb 2012 Israel: MC still dovish, but the policy rate outlook is more ambiguous now, N. Mevorach 16 Feb 2012 Israel: Real GDP growth slowed moderately in Q4 while strong government spending offset a sharp contraction in household spending and exports, N. Mevorach 15 Feb 2012 Israel: CPI inflation slowed in January to the central bank's target rate, N. Mevorach 23 Jan 2012 Israel: Monetary Committee cut the policy rate by 25bps to 2.50%, continuing the monetary policy easing cycle on the back of eurozone concerns, N. Mevorach 16 Jan 2012 Israel: CPI inflation slowed more than expected in December, but we expect the Monetary Committee to remain on hold again on 23 January, N. Mevorach 28 Dec 2011 Israel: Monetary Committee on hold but dovish, N. Mevorach 15 Dec 2011 Israel: An unexpected fall in inflation in November, driven by housing and transportation prices, N. Mevorach
Source: Credit Suisse
152
14 March 2012
Previous publications
From Credit Suisses Economics Team since the last Emerging Markets Quarterly
POLAND
13 Mar 2012 Poland: Run-rate of core inflation continued to moderate in February, G. Hudecz 07 Mar 2012 Poland: MPC maintained its hawkish stance today, G. Hudecz 13 Feb 2012 Poland: Stable sources of external financing came close to financing the current account deficit in 2011, G. Hudecz 08 Feb 2012 Poland: MPC believes that the risk of elevated inflation in the coming months remain high, G. Hudecz 18 Jan 2012 Poland: Time to pay rates, S. Siddiqui, G. Hudecz 13 Jan 2012 Poland: CPI inflation moderated in December, but our measure of core inflation continued to rise, G. Hudecz 11 Jan 2012 Poland: MPC sees increased risk of elevated inflation in the coming months, G. Hudecz 13 Dec 2011 Poland: Another month of broad-based increase in CPI inflation, G. Hudecz 12 Dec 2011 Poland: Life with a weaker zloty, G. Hudecz 07 Dec 2011 Poland: MPC sticking to its hawkish line, G. Hudecz
RUSSIA
13 Mar 2012 Russia: All policy rates kept unchanged amid uncertain external and domestic environment, S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov 09 Mar 2012 Russia: A new era for the local bond market, S. Siddiqui, I. Arsenin, S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov 05 Mar 2012 Russia: Putin wins election with 64% support but will need to act to back his claim of a strong mandate, S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov 05 Mar 2012 Russian Local Markets Monitor (Can the recent fiscal easing be sustained?), S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov, S. Siddiqui 16 Feb 2012 Russia: Stronger than expected industrial output data support neutral policy stance, S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov 14 Feb 2012 Russia: Januarys federal budget deficit surprise: a pre-election spending splurge or a change in policy?, S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov 06 Feb 2012 Russian Local Markets Monitor (After two 4.3% years, growth is set to slow in 2012), S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov, S. Siddiqui 03 Feb 2012 Russia: CBR left policy rates unchanged in line with expectations, likely to extend the pause, S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov 25 Jan 2012 Russia: The rouble surges to a 5-month high against basket, has further potential for appreciation, S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov 24 Jan 2012 Russia: Weak December industrial output data strengthens the case for near-term policy easing, S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov 20 Jan 2012 Russian Local Markets Monitor (Tighter liquidity, large trade surplus in sight), S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov, S. Siddiqui 16 Jan 2012 Russia: Fitch drops positive rating outlook on political uncertainty, S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov 13 Jan 2012 Russia: Higher current account surplus should offset large outflows and support the rouble in the near term, S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov 10 Jan 2012 Russia: Sharply lower headline inflation paves way for further policy easing in Q1, S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov 29 Dec 2011 Russia: Intervention band widening, soft PMI and inflation data add to the downward pressure on the rouble ahead of holidays, S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov 29 Dec 2011 Russia: Close out payer positions on 1-year xccy swaps, S. Siddiqui, S. Voloboev 23 Dec 2011 Russia: CBR starts easing policy early, narrows rates corridor further, S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov 19 Dec 2011 Russian Local Markets Monitor (March presidential elections no longer a formality), S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov, S. Siddiqui 12 Dec 2011 Russia: Pay on 1-year xccy swaps, buy 1-month USDRUB RKO Calls, S. Siddiqui, A. Bagaria, S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov 08 Dec 2011 Russia: CBR continues to limit REPO volumes, allowing liquidity conditions to worsen, S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov
SOUTH AFRICA
14 Mar 2012 South Africa: Retail sales declined in January, after strong growth in December, C. Teixeira 12 Mar 2012 South Africa: Manufacturing production increased in January, led by the motor sector, C. Teixeira 29 Feb 2012 South Africa: Budget deficit widens to 4.6% of GDP on a 12-month rolling sum, C. Teixeira 29 Feb 2012 South Africa: Export growth slows further, while import growth sustained, C. Teixeira 28 Feb 2012 South Africa: Broad-based acceleration in Q4 GDP growth, led by the trade sector, C. Teixeira 23 Feb 2012 South Africa: Construction awaits vigor in infrastructure investment, C. Teixeira 22 Feb 2012 South Africa: Budget deficits cut on the expectation that revenue growth will outpace GDP and that expenditure growth will not, C. Teixeira 22 Feb 2012 South Africa: Core consumer price inflation jumps to 4.3% yoy in January, C. Teixeira 15 Feb 2012 South Africa: Retail sales increased to an historical high in December, C. Teixeira 14 Feb 2012 South Africa and Turkey: Take profits on TR30s basis trade, S. Siddiqui 09 Feb 2012 South Africa: Manufacturing production declined in December in line with the PMI, C. Teixeira 09 Feb 2012 South Africa: Mining production continued to expand in December, C. Teixeira 07 Feb 2012 South Africa and Turkey: We like the basis on sovereign dollar debt, S. Siddiqui
Source: Credit Suisse
153
14 March 2012
Previous publications
From Credit Suisses Economics Team since the last Emerging Markets Quarterly 30 Jan 2012 South Africa: Better prospects for mining output in 2012, C. Teixeira 30 Jan 2012 South Africa: Higher tax revenues helped push the 12-month rolling budget deficit lower, C. Teixeira 19 Jan 2012 South Africa: Reserve Bank seeking stable interest rate environment, C. Teixeira 18 Jan 2012 South Africa: Retail sales declined in November, ending a five month run higher, C. Teixeira 18 Jan 2012 South Africa: Consumer price inflation stabilizes at 6.1% year-on-year; core at 3.9%, C. Teixeira 17 Jan 2012 South Africa: Mining production recorded a broad-based bounce in November, C. Teixeira 17 Jan 2012 South Africa: Take profit on receiver trades in South Africa, S. Siddiqui, C. Teixeira 12 Jan 2012 South Africa: Manufacturing production bounces in November, C. Teixeira 08 Dec 2011 South Africa: Manufacturing production volumes resume decline, C. Teixeira 08 Dec 2011 South Africa: Mining volumes continue to decline; PGMs down, C. Teixeira 08 Dec 2011 South Africa: Current account deficit widens as dividend payments surge in Q3, C. Teixeira 08 Dec 2011 South Africa: Retail sales rise to historical high, C. Teixeira
TURKEY
12 Mar 2012 Turkey: Flat non-oil current account balance in Q1 2012?, B. Bayazitoglu 05 Mar 2012 Turkey: A modest improvement in core inflation dynamics in February, B. Bayazitoglu 22 Feb 2012 Turkey: Put on 2s5s xccy curve steepener, S. Siddiqui, B. Bayazitoglu 21 Feb 2012 Turkey: MPC Now, you know the answer to how much longer?, B. Bayazitoglu 13 Feb 2012 Turkey: Where is the current account deficit heading to?, B. Bayazitoglu 03 Feb 2012 Turkey: There is a core problem, B. Bayazitoglu 31 Jan 2012 Turkey: How tight and how much longer?, B. Bayazitoglu 24 Jan 2012 Turkey: MPC Less concerned about the lira but still not confident in the repo rate of 5.75%, B. Bayazitoglu 11 Jan 2012 Turkey: Central bank content with BoP dynamics for now?, B. Bayazitoglu 05 Jan 2012 Turkey: Roll 5Y payers into 2s5s steepeners, I. Arsenin, B. Bayazitoglu, S. Siddiqui 03 Jan 2012 Turkey: Pay 5Y cross-currency swap rates, I. Arsenin, B. Bayazitoglu 03 Jan 2012 Turkey: Double-digit inflation triggers additional monetary tightening, B. Bayazitoglu 28 Dec 2011 Turkey: In the name of predictability, B. Bayazitoglu 28 Dec 2011 Turkey: The central bank introduced term-financing for both lira and FX, B. Bayazitoglu 22 Dec 2011 Turkey: Lira liquidity to remain tight, as long as credit growth holds up, B. Bayazitoglu 12 Dec 2011 Turkey: Impressions from the central banks investor meeting in London, B. Bayazitoglu 12 Dec 2011 Turkey: Household spending drove the economy stronger in Q3 but the rebalancing continued, B. Bayazitoglu
UKRAINE
24 Feb 2012 Ukraine: Reshuffle is unlikely to bring early policy changes, S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov 18 Jan 2012 Ukraine: Khoroshkovsky's appointment as finance minister tightens presidential control over budget flows, S. Voloboev, A. Pogorelov 10 Jan 2012 Ukraine and Hungary: Where would you rather be Kiev or Budapest? I. Arsenin, K. Bartholdy, G. Hudecz, N. Mustafayev, S. Voloboev
Source: Credit Suisse
154
14 March 2012
Previous publications
From Credit Suisses Economics Team since the last Emerging Markets Quarterly
EMERGING ASIA
05 Mar 2012 Oil & Asia: Charting the effects, R. Prior-Wandesforde 01 Feb 2012 Asian Daily: Asia PMIs: Turning for the better 20 Feb 2012 Asia rates: Monday musings, A. Agrawal 13 Feb 2012 Asia rates: Monday musings, A. Agrawal 12 Jan 2012 Asia 2012: Our top ten non-consensus economic calls, R. Prior-Wandesforde, D. Tao, S. Sathirathai, C. Tuntono, K. L. Wu 04 Jan 2012 Asian Daily: Regional - Asian Exports & PMIs, R. Prior-Wandesforde 13 Dec 2011 Focus Asia (Q1 2012) - Better times?, R. Prior-Wandesforde, D. Tao, S. Sathirathai, C. Tuntono, K. L. Wu
CHINA
05 Mar 2012 China: Is the commodity supercycle behind us? , D. Tao 01 Mar 2012 China: PMI improved, but distorted by seasonality, D. Tao 01 Mar 2012 China: Assessing the state of the economy - Hard landing risk is gone, but rebound is weak, D. Tao 28 Feb 2012 Asia rates China: Markets to consolidate, A. Agrawal 20 Feb 2012 China: Regulators are planning large scale debt roll-over for LGFV, D. Tao 20 Feb 2012 China: More fine-tuning of monetary conditions: PBoC cuts required reserves ratio by 50bps, D .Tao 16 Feb 2012 China: PBoC said downward pressure on growth and upward pressure on inflation coexist, suggesting policy neutrality, D. Tao, C. Tuntono 01 Feb 2012 China: PMI remained above 50 in January, D. Tao 31 Jan 2012 China: Pay 2y IRS, target 3.25%, stop 2.5%, A. Agrawal 25 Jan 2012 Asia rates China: Biased to pay IRS, A. Agrawal 13 Jan 2012 China: New QFII quota may emerge on the horizon, D. Tao 17 Jan 2012 China: Growth slowed, but surprised on the upside: 4Q11 GDP growth at 8.9% yoy, D. Tao, C. Tuntono 03 Jan 2012 China: PMI rebounded: But risk is still to the downside, D. Tao, C. Tuntono 15 Dec 2011 China: Cyclical stability, structural break-through, D. Tao, C. Tuntono 14 Dec 2011 China: National Economic Working Conference: Cyclical stability, structural breakthrough, D. Tao, C. Tuntono
HONG KONG
01 Feb 2012 Hong Kong: Budget speech generally in line, but our concern about FY12-13 performance looms, C. Tuntono
INDIA
06 Mar 2012 India: Reiterate long 2017 bonds, pay 5y OIS, A. Agrawal 28 Feb 2012 India: A fiscal horror show?, R. Prior-Wandesforde, S. Sathirathai, A. Agrawal 15 Feb 2012 Asia rates India: Initiate 2s5s OIS steepeners, A. Agrawal
INDONESIA
23 Feb 2012 Indonesia: Implications of a potential fuel price hike, K. L. Wu, R. Prior-Wandesforde 10 Feb 2012 Asia rates Indonesia: Volatility likely to rise, A. Agrawal 18 Jan 2012 Asia rates Indonesia: BI actions fuel rally again, A. Agrawal 09 Dec 2011 Asia rates Indonesia: Turning more cautious, A. Agrawal
KOREA
09 Mar 2012 Asia rates Korea: Pay 5y IRS, A. Agrawal 08 Mar 2012 Korea: BoK stays on pause again in March, showing greater ease over growth, C. Tuntono 29 Feb 2012 Korea: January production was better than expected, giving support for policy inaction, C. Tuntono 09 Feb 2012 Korea: BoK stayed on pause again in February, and has turned a bit more concerned about inflation, C. Tuntono
Source: Credit Suisse
155
14 March 2012
Previous publications
From Credit Suisses Economics Team since the last Emerging Markets Quarterly 09 Feb 2012 Korea: Inventory surged; production to remain soft, C. Tuntono 09 Feb 2012 Asia rates Korea: Range gets wider, A. Agrawal 31 Jan 2012 Korea: December production weakens further, though the leading indices show some stability, C. Tuntono 26 Jan 2012 Korea: Domestic demand weakened visibly in the preliminary 4Q11 GDP report, C. Tuntono 20 Jan 2012 Asia rates Korea: Trapped in a range, A. Agrawal
MALAYSIA
25 Jan 2012 Asia rates Malaysia: Retain tactical bearish bias, A. Agrawal 12 Jan 2012 Malaysias Economy and Markets in 2012, K. L. Wu
PHILIPPINES
12 Jan 2012 Philippines: Growth fears, rate hopes, S. Sathirathai
SINGAPORE
17 Feb 2012 Singapore's Budget 2012: Lower potential growth near term?, K. L. Wu
TAIWAN
23 Feb 2012 Taiwan: Industrial production fell 16.64% YoY in January, but sequential growth suggests resilience, C. Tuntono 20 Feb 2012 Taiwan: January export orders fell sharply by 8.63% YoY, distorted by the lunar new year effect, C. Tuntono 31 Jan 2012 Taiwan: A technical recession; 4Q11 GDP disappointed, forecast downgraded, C. Tuntono 06 Jan 2012 Taiwan: The threat of marginalization still looms, C. Tuntono
THAILAND
29 Feb 2012 Asia rates Thailand: Position for bear steepening, A. Agrawal 13 Feb 2012 Thailands post-flood recovery: Turning the tide, S. Sathirathai
Source: Credit Suisse
156
14 March 2012
Key dates
LATIN AMERICA ARGENTINA
Submission of 2013 budget proposal to Congress End of Congressional ordinary sessions Mid September 2012 30 November 2012 18 April 2012 30 May 2012 11 July 2012 29 August 2012 10 October 2012 28 November 2012
BRAZIL
Monetary policy decision Monetary policy decision Monetary policy decision Monetary policy decision Monetary policy decision Monetary policy decision
CHILE
Monetary policy decision Monetary policy minutes Monetary policy decision Monetary policy minutes Monetary policy decision Monetary policy minutes Monetary policy decision Monetary policy minutes Monetary policy decision Monetary policy minutes Monetary policy decision 15 March 2012 30 March 2012 17 April 2012 3 May 2012 17 May 2012 4 June 2012 14 June 2012 29 June 2012 12 July 2012 30 July 2012 16 August 2012
COLOMBIA
Start of Congress second ordinary sessions Monetary policy decision Monetary policy decision Monetary policy decision End of Congress second ordinary sessions Monetary policy decision Start of Congress first ordinary sessions Monetary policy decision Submission of 2013 budget proposal to Congress Monetary policy decision Monetary policy decision Monetary policy decision Monetary policy decision Monetary policy decision End of Congress first ordinary sessions 16 March 2012 23 March 2012 30 April 2012 25 May 2012 20 June 2012 29 June 2012 20 July 2012 27 July 2012 End-July 2012 24 August 2012 28 September 2012 26 October 2012 23 November 2012 14 December 2012 16 December 2012
MEXICO
Monetary policy decision Monetary policy minutes Start of the presidential campaigns Monetary policy decision End of the ordinary period in congress Monetary policy minutes Quarterly inflation report Monetary policy decision Monetary policy minutes End of the presidential campaigns
Source: Credit Suisse
16 March 2012 30 March 2012 30 March 2012 27 April 2012 30 April 2012 11 May 2012 16 May 2012 8 June 2012 22 June 2012 27 June 2012
157
14 March 2012
Key dates
LATIN AMERICA (contd) MEXICO (contd)
Presidential and congressional elections; governor elections in the states of Guanajuato, Jalisco, Morelos, Tabasco, Yucatan, Chiapas and DF Monetary policy decision Monetary policy minutes Quarterly inflation report Start of the ordinary session in congress Monetary policy decision Monetary policy minutes Monetary policy decision Quarterly inflation report Monetary policy minutes Monetary policy decision Inauguration ceremony for the new President Monetary policy decision End of the ordinary session in congress 1 July 2012 20 July 2012 3 August 2012 15 August 2012 1 September 2012 7 September 2012 21 September 2012 26 October 2012 7 November 2012 9 November 2012 30 November 2012 1 December 2012 14 December 2012 15 December 2012
PANAMA
End of Congress first ordinary sessions Start of Congress second ordinary sessions End of Congress second ordinary sessions 30 April 2012 2 July 2012 31 October 2012
PERU
Monetary policy decision Monetary policy decision Monetary policy decision End of Congressional second ordinary sessions Monetary policy decision Start of Congressional first ordinary sessions Monetary policy decision Submission of 2013 budget proposal to Congress Monetary policy decision Monetary policy decision Monetary policy decision Monetary policy decision End of Congressional first ordinary sessions 12 April 2012 10 May 2012 7 June 2012 15 June 2012 12 July 2012 27 July 2012 9 August 2012 Mid-August 2012 6 September 2012 11 October 2012 8 November 2012 6 December 2012 15 December 2012
VENEZUELA
Presidential election Gubernatorial elections Presidential inauguration
Source: Credit Suisse
158
14 March 2012
Key dates
EASTERN EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CZECH REPUBLIC
Czech National Bank Board policy rate decision Czech National Bank Board policy rate decision Czech National Bank Board policy rate decision Czech National Bank Board policy rate decision Czech National Bank Board policy rate decision Czech National Bank Board policy rate decision Czech National Bank Board policy rate decision 29 March 2012 3 May 2012 28 June 2012 2 Aug 2012 27 Sep 2012 1 Nov 2012 19 Dec 2012
HUNGARY
Monetary Council meeting Monetary Council meeting Monetary Council meeting Deadline for fiscal adjustment to avoid EU sanctions from 2013 Monetary Council meeting 27 March 2012 24 April 2012 29 May 2012 22 June 2012 26 June 2012
ISRAEL
Q4 2011 Balance of payments data Monetary Committee rate-setting meeting Monetary Committee rate-setting meeting Q1 2012 GDP data Monetary Committee rate-setting meeting Monetary Committee rate-setting meeting 14 March 2012 26 March 2012 23 April 2012 16 May 2012 28 May 2012 25 June 2012
POLAND
Monetary Policy Council meeting Monetary Policy Council meeting Monetary Policy Council meeting Monetary Policy Council meeting Monetary Policy Council meeting Monetary Policy Council meeting Monetary Policy Council meeting Monetary Policy Council meeting 3-4 April 2012 8-9 May 2012 5-6 June 2012 3-4 July 2012 4-5 September 2012 2-3 October 2012 6-7 November 2012 4-5 December 2012
RUSSIA
Excise taxes, payments to off-budget funds are due Corporate profit tax payable VAT payable Excise, mineral extraction taxes are due Corporate profit tax payable Corporate profit tax payable Excise taxes, payments to off-budget funds are due VAT payable Excise, mineral extraction taxes are due Corporate profit tax payable Inauguration of the newly elected president 15 March 2012 16 March 2012 20 March 2012 26 March 2012 28 March 2012 13 April 2012 16 April 2012 20 April 2012 25 April 2012 28 April 2012 7 May 2012
SOUTH AFRICA
Reserve Bank Quarterly Bulletin Q4 Monetary Policy Committee meeting Monetary Policy Committee meeting Statistics South Africa supply-side Q1 2012 GDP data
Source: Credit Suisse
159
14 March 2012
Key dates
EASTERN EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA (contd.) TURKEY
Monetary Policy Committee meeting Monetary Policy Committee meeting Release of the quarterly inflation report Monetary Policy Committee meeting Monetary Policy Committee meeting Monetary Policy Committee meeting Release of the quarterly inflation report Monetary Policy Committee meeting Announcement of medium-term fiscal program Monetary Policy Committee meeting Deadline for the submission of the draft 2013 budget to parliament Monetary Policy Committee meeting Release of the quarterly inflation report Monetary Policy Committee meeting Monetary Policy Committee meeting Deadline for the parliamentary approval of the 2013 budget 27 March 2012 18 April 2012 26 April 2012 29 May 2012 21 June 2012 19 July 2012 26 July 2012 16 August 2012 September-October 2012 18 September 2012 17 October 2012 18 October 2012 24 October 2012 20 November 2012 18 December 2012 31 December 2012
UKRAINE
Maturity of the $2.0bn loan originally granted to the government of Ukraine by Russias VTB bank in June 2010 Ukraine to host the European football championship (jointly with Poland) Maturity of the $500mn Eurobond Scheduled parliamentary elections
Source: Credit Suisse
160
14 March 2012
Key dates
EMERGING ASIA CHINA
Communist Party Congress October 2012
HONG KONG
Chief Executive Election 25 March 2012
INDIA
RBI policy review 17 April 2012
INDONESIA
Bank Indonesia Meeting Bank Indonesia Meeting Bank Indonesia Meeting 12 April 2012 10 May 2012 12 June 2012
KOREA
Bank of Korea Monetary Policy Meeting National Assembly election Bank of Korea Monetary Policy Meeting Bank of Korea Monetary Policy Meeting Presidential election 13 April 2012 April 2012 10 May 2012 08 June 2012 December 2012
MALAYSIA
Bank Negara Monetary Policy Meeting Bank Negara Monetary Policy Meeting Bank Negara Monetary Policy Meeting 3 May 2012 5 July 2012 6 Sep 2012
PHILIPPINES
Banko Sentral ng Pilipinas Monetary Policy Meeting Banko Sentral ng Pilipinas Monetary Policy Meeting 19 April 2012 14 June 2012
SINGAPORE
Monetary Policy Meeting Mid-April 2012
TAIWAN
Central Bank of China quarterly Monetary Policy Meeting Central Bank of China quarterly Monetary Policy Meeting 29 March 2012 28 June 2012
THAILAND
Bank of Thailand Monetary Policy Committee Meeting Bank of Thailand Monetary Policy Committee Meeting
Source: Credit Suisse
161
14 March 2012
4.9 5.6 5.4 17.3 5.4 3.8 na 5.9 -4.6 13.5 17.8 34.5 26.7 5.2 27.5 2.6 10.9 23.3 31.1 12.5 5.3 274.0 9.9 6.3 14.2 3.9 6.1 13.7 14.9 11.0
3.0 2.6 3.9 9.4 4.3 2.2 na 2.8 -4.6 5.9 5.8 12.2 3.9 2.6 12.6 0.4 6.0 12.9 19.1 1.2 -1.1 24.5 6.4 3.5 3.0 1.2 2.4 -4.7 -0.8 2.5
8.5 3.6 11.8 -0.1 5.2 7.8 4.3 0.2 8.9 5.6 10.1 15.1 11.2 -0.7 11.6 0.8 10.7 8.1 7.7 6.6 6.6 0.7 10.5 3.6 3.0 9.9 na 3.5 na 6.8
162
14 March 2012
(1) Including payments to foreign holdings of local law federal government bonds; the data for 2010 include flows related restructuring of defaulted government bonds. (2) The IMFs data dissemination system reports that Argentina has a larger stock of short-term debt, but our understanding is that the IMF number includes debt that has been in arrears since 2001 and is not being serviced. (3) This includes foreigners' purchases of local law federal government bonds. For 2008 and 2009, it includes the sale of Boden 2015 to Venezuela. (4) This includes accumulation of new arrears and capital flight. Source: Central Bank, Ministry of Finance, Credit Suisse
BRAZIL
$bn Funding need (including short-term debt amortization) Funding need (excluding short-term debt amortization) Current account deficit FDI outflows Medium- and long-term debt amortization Public Private Short-term debt amortization Funding sources (including gross short-term borrowing) FDI inflows Portfolio investments Stocks Fixed income Government bonds Borrowing by the government (from other sources than the IMF) Medium- and long-term borrowing by the private sector Short-term debt contracted from abroad (gross) Other capital inflows/errors and omissions Change in international net reserves (- indicates increase)
Source: Central Bank, Ministry of Finance, Credit Suisse
2007 64.0 43.7 -1.6 7.1 38.2 11.4 26.8 20.3 64.0 34.6 42.6 26.2 13.5 2.9 0.8 32.3 38.9 2.3 -87.5
2008 109.9 71.0 28.2 20.5 22.4 4.2 18.1 38.9 109.9 45.1 6.8 -7.6 13.8 0.5 1.9 29.2 36.4 -6.5 -3.0
2009 80.8 44.3 24.3 -10.1 30.1 5.0 25.1 36.4 80.8 25.9 50.9 37.1 9.7 4.2 4.6 27.1 29.5 -10.5 -46.7
2010 122.2 92.8 47.3 11.6 33.8 8.1 25.8 29.5 122.2 48.4 53.9 37.7 13.4 2.8 5.6 54.1 55.3 -46.0 -49.1
2011E 136.3 81.0 52.6 -9.3 37.7 7.7 30.0 55.3 136.3 66.7 7.7 6.2 -0.2 1.7 2.8 79.7 39.0 -1.0 -58.6
2012F 136.4 97.4 54.2 -3.4 46.6 4.2 42.5 39.0 136.4 55.0 5.2 4.9 -1.0 1.3 3.0 71.6 42.4 -19.8 -21.0
163
14 March 2012
2007 17.5 6.5 -7.5 2.6 11.4 11.0 17.5 12.5 -16.5 16.0 -0.5 0.2 13.8 4.9 2.5 164
2008 40.1 25.3 3.3 8.0 14.0 14.7 40.1 15.2 -7.6 10.3 2.6 4.0 22.4 12.5 -6.3 170
2009 33.7 15.8 -2.6 8.1 10.3 17.9 33.7 12.9 -11.8 13.7 1.9 5.1 19.7 10.0 -2.2 161
2010 38.5 18.7 -3.8 8.7 13.8 19.8 38.5 15.1 -7.1 16.5 9.4 9.5 17.0 6.5 -2.5 204
2011E 54.8 32.3 4.3 7.3 20.7 22.5 54.8 17.5 8.4 2.3 10.7 12.0 23.4 7.6 -14.1 238
2012F 44.1 23.9 5.0 4.0 14.9 20.2 44.1 12.0 2.0 5.0 7.0 6.0 25.4 0.0 -1.3 255
COLOMBIA
$bn Funding need (including short-term debt amortization) Funding need (excluding short-term debt amortization) Current account deficit FDI outflows Medium- and long-term debt amortization Public sector IFIs Non-IFIs Private sector Non-financial private sector Financial private sector Short-term debt amortization Funding sources (including gross short-term borrowing) FDI inflows IMF lending IFI lending excluding IMF Public sector borrowing (excluding IFI lending)* Net portfolio investments Medium-term non-financial private sector borrowing Medium-term financial private sector borrowing Short-term financing Other capital flows/errors and omissions Change in FX reserves (- indicates increase)
* Including pre-financing Source: Central Bank, Ministry of Finance, Credit Suisse
2007 19.8 12.0 6.0 0.9 5.1 2.8 1.4 1.4 2.3 2.1 0.1 7.8 19.8 9.0 0.0 1.9 3.0 0.4 3.1 0.8 7.4 -0.4 -5.5
2008 15.2 12.9 6.8 2.3 3.8 1.7 0.5 1.2 2.1 1.9 0.3 2.3 15.2 10.6 0.0 1.4 1.0 -0.2 2.3 0.1 2.8 0.2 -3.1
2009 17.4 12.3 5.0 3.1 4.2 1.1 0.5 0.6 3.1 2.8 0.3 5.1 17.4 7.1 0.0 2.1 3.5 -0.1 3.5 0.0 4.4 -1.8 -1.3
2010 24.5 20.4 8.9 6.5 5.0 1.7 0.7 1.0 3.3 3.2 0.1 4.2 24.5 6.9 0.0 2.1 3.3 1.0 6.6 1.8 5.8 0.3 -3.1
2011E 23.0 17.2 8.6 4.1 4.4 1.2 0.8 0.5 3.2 3.0 0.2 5.8 23.0 15.1 0.0 1.1 1.9 1.0 4.5 0.8 4.5 -2.2 -3.8
2012F 20.9 16.4 9.4 2.4 4.6 1.9 0.7 1.2 2.7 2.5 0.2 4.5 20.9 14.9 0.0 1.1 3.0 1.0 3.5 0.5 4.0 -2.1 -5.0
164
14 March 2012
2007 37.9 26.4 9.3 8.3 3.2 2.0 1.2 5.6 11.5 37.9 31.3 7.3 15.1 25.1 -27.5 -2.5 -10.9
2008 50.9 30.4 15.7 1.2 5.9 3.7 2.2 7.6 20.5 50.9 26.9 2.4 8.0 19.5 6.0 -3.9 -8.0
2009 38.4 23.2 5.1 7.0 5.8 3.7 2.1 5.3 15.2 38.4 16.0 7.6 14.0 16.2 -2.0 -8.8 -4.6
2010 47.5 27.6 3.1 13.6 7.1 5.4 1.7 3.8 19.9 47.4 20.2 23.8 16.0 8.2 0.0 0.0 -20.8
2011E 48.6 28.0 8.8 9.6 6.0 5.4 0.6 3.6 20.6 48.6 19.4 25.4 20.0 12.4 0.0 0.0 -28.6
2012F 47.3 27.3 11.9 8.0 2.8 1.7 1.1 4.6 20.0 47.3 20.0 21.0 10.0 11.0 5.3 0.0 -20.0
PERU
$bn Funding need (including short-term debt amortization) Funding need (excluding short-term debt amortization) Current account deficit FDI outflows Medium- and long-term debt amortization Public sector IFIs (1) Paris Club (2) External market debt amortization (3) Private sector Short-term debt amortization Funding sources (including gross short-term borrowing) FDI inflows Net portfolio investments IFI lending (excluding IMF) Paris Club lending to Perus government sector Public sector external bond issuance (4) Medium-term private-sector borrowing Short-term financing Other Change in FX reserves (- indicates increase) 2007 6.8 3.4 -1.5 0.1 4.8 3.3 1.0 2.1 0.2 1.5 3.4 6.8 5.5 0.5 0.7 0.1 2.4 4.4 6.3 -2.7 -10.4 2008 15.7 9.4 5.3 0.7 3.3 2.6 1.0 0.3 1.3 0.8 6.3 15.7 6.9 0.7 1.1 0.1 0.0 3.4 6.4 0.6 -3.5 2009 9.3 2.9 -0.2 0.4 2.8 1.8 0.7 1.2 0.0 0.9 6.4 9.3 5.6 -3.6 1.1 0.2 2.0 2.1 4.8 -0.8 -1.9 2010 11.8 7.0 2.6 0.2 4.2 3.0 1.9 1.1 0.0 1.2 4.8 11.8 7.3 2.5 1.3 0.3 2.3 5.0 6.3 -2.2 -11.0 2011E 10.6 4.3 2.3 0.1 1.9 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.0 1.1 6.3 10.6 7.7 -0.3 1.1 0.1 0.0 3.8 6.2 -3.2 -4.7 2012F 11.7 5.5 3.1 0.4 2.1 1.2 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.9 6.2 11.7 7.5 2.5 1.2 0.1 1.0 4.5 6.5 -0.1 -11.5
(1) In 2010, it includes prepayments to the Inter-American Development Bank and the CAF (2) It includes prepayments to the Paris Club. (3) In 2008, it includes an $816mn prepayment of the Brady bonds. (4) It includes issuance to prepay Paris Club debt. Source: Central Bank, Ministry of Finance, Credit Suisse
165
14 March 2012
2007 -16.6 -17.3 0.0 0.7 -16.6 1.6 2.5 -26.3 -1.3 2.6 -23.3 -4.2 -0.2 5.7
2008 -30.9 -34.3 1.2 2.2 -30.9 1.2 2.6 -26.8 -0.4 -0.8 -17.6 -8.0 1.4 -9.3
2009 -3.1 -6.0 1.8 1.1 -3.1 -2.5 9.7 -18.1 -4.0 2.9 -16.0 -0.9 -2.4 10.3
2010 -6.2 -12.1 2.7 3.2 -6.2 1.2 2.4 -18.7 -4.6 7.1 -18.7 -2.5 0.8 8.1
2011E -22.3 -27.2 0.2 4.7 -22.3 5.3 2.5 -35.2 -11.0 11.0 -31.7 -3.5 1.1 4.0
2012F -19.2 -23.2 3.3 0.7 -19.2 1.9 11.8 -26.9 -7.8 9.1 -25.2 -2.9 -2.3 -3.6
2007 26.3 10.9 5.8 11.0 1.6 3.5 15.4 26.3 10.6 -3.5 0.8 2.7 22.6 1.0 0.0 -4.5 -3.4 0.8 1.5
2008 33.1 10.5 1.2 17.0 4.3 5.0 22.6 33.1 6.6 -1.9 1.9 3.5 26.1 1.8 -0.8 -2.0 -2.1 0.7 1.2
2009 33.9 7.8 2.1 13.1 1.3 4.4 26.1 33.9 2.7 -1.8 7.8 6.0 22.7 2.2 -0.4 -0.7 -4.6 1.4 0.9
2010 35.2 12.5 6.0 13.3 1.8 4.7 22.7 35.2 6.7 0.3 7.8 2.2 24.9 1.8 -0.2 -7.4 -0.9 0.5 1.1
2011E 35.5 10.6 4.8 15.1 0.8 5.0 24.9 35.5 5.2 -0.2 0.2 5.0 24.9 0.8 0.0 -2.6 2.2 1.0 1.0
2012F 36.9 12.0 5.0 14.0 2.0 5.0 24.9 36.9 4.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 27.4 1.0 0.0 0.0 -1.0 Assumptions 1.1 1.1
166
14 March 2012
2007 45.5 22.9 9.9 10.2 3.7 9.3 22.6 45.5 4.0 -7.6 5.2 12.8 32.9 1.0 1.1 -1.4 -2.5 1.4 1.5
2008 61.3 28.4 11.3 10.9 2.0 15.1 32.9 61.3 5.8 -3.5 0.5 25.3 27.8 1.6 -1.1 5.6 9.1 -9.8 1.7 0.8
2009 41.8 14.0 0.1 6.7 1.9 12.0 27.8 41.8 1.7 -0.3 -4.7 13.6 28.6 1.5 1.0 0.7 10.0 -10.3 1.1 1.0
2010 41.2 12.6 -1.4 6.8 1.4 12.6 28.6 41.2 1.9 -1.2 0.9 9.7 33.5 2.2 0.8 -5.8 0.0 -0.8 0.8 1.2
2011E 50.4 16.9 -2.0 8.5 1.0 17.9 33.5 50.4 0.0 0.0 8.0 14.3 30.2 2.8 0.0 -1.1 0.0 -3.8 0.8 0.9
2012F 46.7 16.6 -0.5 9.0 1.0 16.1 30.2 46.7 2.0 0.0 0.0 14.5 27.1 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Assumptions 0.9 0.9
ISRAEL
$bn Funding need (including short-term debt amortization) Funding need (excluding short-term debt amortization) Current account deficit FDI outflows Medium and long-term debt amortization Public sector Private sector Short-term debt amortizations Funding sources (including gross short-term borrowing) FDI inflows Portfolio investments, net Medium and long-term borrowing Public sector Private sector Short-term debt financing Errors and omissions Change in reserves (- indicates increase) Rollover ratios: Medium- and long-term debt Public sector Private sector Short-term debt
Source: IMF, Central Bank, Credit Suisse
2007 46.3 9.4 -4.9 8.6 5.6 3.1 2.5 37.0 46.3 8.8 -1.5 8.7 1.3 7.5 40.2 -10.4 0.5
2008 50.5 10.3 -1.5 7.2 4.6 2.9 1.7 40.2 50.5 10.9 -0.6 2.8 1.3 1.6 40.3 11.1 -14.0
2009 40.2 -0.1 -7.1 1.7 5.3 2.0 3.3 40.3 40.2 4.4 -5.9 7.4 3.2 4.2 42.2 10.1 -18.1
2010 49.8 7.6 -6.3 8.0 6.0 3.4 2.6 42.2 49.8 5.2 0.1 7.4 3.3 4.1 54.3 -6.9 -10.3
2011E 65.3 11.0 1.5 4.7 4.7 1.4 3.3 54.3 65.3 7.9 -0.8 6.3 1.5 4.8 54.7 1.2 -4.0
2012F 64.0 9.3 -2.5 6.0 5.7 2.3 3.5 54.7 64.0 7.4 -1.4 5.8 2.4 3.5 54.7 2.2 -4.7
167
14 March 2012
2007 35.2 22.6 7.2 4.0 11.4 0.1 8.3 3.0 12.7 35.2 11.9 -4.6 27.2 20.5 6.7 12.0 -11.1 -3.2 3.0
2008 25.3 13.3 -6.3 3.7 15.9 0.2 10.1 5.5 12.0 25.3 16.8 -9.3 21.7 7.4 14.3 10.6 -6.4 -6.0 -2.2
2009 38.4 27.8 4.2 4.1 19.4 0.1 14.8 4.5 10.6 38.4 14.3 3.0 14.4 4.9 9.5 11.4 -5.8 -1.3 2.5
2010 20.5 9.1 -4.3 3.7 9.7 1.0 2.5 6.2 11.4 20.5 6.5 8.7 10.8 1.5 9.4 6.8 -6.8 1.4 -7.0
2011E 14.7 7.9 -12.9 4.2 16.6 3.1 3.1 10.4 6.8 14.7 8.9 -7.3 19.0 3.5 15.5 5.3 -1.7 0.0 -9.5
2012F 10.7 5.4 -9.3 3.4 11.3 0.5 3.2 7.7 5.3 10.7 7.5 -2.7 13.9 3.2 10.7 5.0 -5.6 0.0 -7.4 Assumptions
POLAND
$bn Funding need (including short-term debt amortization) Funding need (excluding short-term debt amortization) Current account deficit of which: Income deficit FDI outflows Medium- and long-term external debt amortization Short-term external debt amortization Funding sources (including gross short-term borrowing) FDI inflows Net portfolio equity inflows Net portfolio debt inflows Medium- and long-term borrowing Short-term borrowing Net capital account inflows (including EU funds) Financial derivatives Other items (incl. net errors and omissions) Change in reserves (- indicates increase) Roll-over ratios: Medium- and long-term debt Short-term debt
Source: National Bank of Poland, Ministry of Finance, IMF, JEDH, Credit Suisse
2007 110.6 76.0 26.5 16.4 5.7 43.8 34.6 110.6 23.7 -6.4 0.9 55.3 60.9 4.7 -2.0 -9.2 -17.3 1.3 1.8
2008 130.5 69.6 35.0 12.8 4.6 30.0 60.9 130.5 15.0 2.0 -4.1 48.4 65.9 6.1 -1.0 -5.4 3.6 1.6 1.1
2009 100.9 35.0 17.2 16.6 5.1 12.7 65.9 100.9 13.8 -0.2 15.2 18.5 70.0 7.0 -1.6 -4.4 -17.4 1.5 1.2
2010 122.2 52.2 21.0 16.7 5.0 26.2 70.0 122.2 10.3 6.8 21.1 31.7 76.5 9.0 -0.5 -18.8 -13.9 1.2 1.1
2011E 122.0 45.5 21.2 19.4 5.8 18.5 76.5 122.0 13.7 3.5 12.7 20.4 76.5 11.1 -0.6 -10.9 -4.4 1.1 1.0
2012F 141.5 65.0 25.8 20.0 6.0 33.2 76.5 141.5 12.0 2.0 10.0 36.5 84.2 10.0 0.0 -5.0 -8.1 Assumptions 1.1 1.1
168
14 March 2012
2007 58.6 1.9 -77.8 45.9 33.8 7.1 26.7 56.7 58.6 55.1 5.6 -19.4 99.7 66.7 -148.9 1,300.0
2008 91.2 -8.4 -103.5 55.6 39.5 4.4 35.1 99.7 91.2 75.0 -35.4 66.3 73.5 -127.1 38.9 1,661.0
2009 132.1 58.6 -48.6 43.7 63.5 2.9 60.6 73.5 132.1 36.5 -2.2 72.7 52.7 -24.3 -3.4 1,223.0
2010 101.2 48.5 -70.3 51.7 67.1 3.2 63.9 52.7 101.2 41.2 -1.6 66.8 54.1 -22.5 -36.8 1,487.0
2011E 48.6 -5.5 -101.1 50.0 45.6 4.8 40.8 54.1 48.6 40.0 -15.0 50.6 45.0 -62.0 -10.0 1,850.0
2012F 53.8 8.8 -102.9 55.0 56.7 2.8 53.9 45.0 53.8 45.0 14.0 46.8 30.0 -70.0 -12.0 2,051.0
SOUTH AFRICA
$bn Funding need (including short-term debt amortization) Funding need (excluding short-term debt amortization) Current account deficit FDI outflows Medium- and long-term debt amortization Public Private Short-term debt amortization (1) Funding sources (including gross short-term borrowing) FDI inflows Portfolio investments Medium- and long-term borrowing by public sector (2) Medium- and long-term borrowing by private sector (2) Short-term loans Other (3) Change in net reserves owing to BOPs (- indicates increase) Roll-over ratios: Medium- and long-term debt Short-term debt 7.1 1.2 -1.9 1.1 4.7 0.8 11.3 1.0 5.1 0.9 1.0 1.0 2007 45.2 24.7 19.9 3.0 1.8 1.3 0.5 20.6 45.2 5.7 10.4 -0.8 13.2 24.0 0.0 -7.4 2008 42.5 18.5 19.6 -3.1 2.0 1.4 0.6 24.0 42.5 9.0 -16.3 -1.2 -2.6 25.5 31.4 -3.2 2009 40.3 14.8 11.5 1.2 2.1 1.2 0.9 25.5 40.3 5.4 11.1 6.0 3.9 21.3 -5.3 -2.1 2010 33.2 12.0 10.3 -0.1 1.8 0.7 1.1 21.3 33.2 1.2 10.0 15.5 4.5 21.7 -15.6 -4.2 2011E 38.5 16.8 14.3 0.2 2.3 0.7 1.6 21.7 38.5 3.6 -1.2 9.7 2.2 20.1 8.3 -4.3 2012F 44.6 24.5 16.6 0.5 7.3 1.8 5.6 20.1 44.6 3.7 6.3 4.5 3.0 20.6 10.0 -3.5
(1) Includes non-residents' deposits. (2) Estimates based on stock data. (3) Includes residents' portfolio and other investments, transfers and net errors and omissions. Repatriation of $8.6bn from abroad and net errors and omissions of $10.6bn are behind the unusually large figure in 2008. Source: Reserve Bank, Credit Suisse
169
14 March 2012
(1) Includes non-residents' deposits. (2) Estimates based on stock data. (3) Includes residents' portfolio and other investments, transfers and net errors and omissions. Repatriation of $8.6bn from abroad and net errors and omissions of $10.6bn are behind the unusually large figure in 2008. Source: Central Bank, Credit Suisse
170
14 March 2012
2007 30.1 15.3 5.3 9.3 1.7 7.6 0.7 14.8 30.1 9.9 5.8 13.1 23.1 -12.8 -9.0 143.1
2008 46.0 22.9 12.8 9.7 0.9 8.8 0.4 23.1 46.0 10.4 0.3 10.1 21.3 5.0 -1.1 179.4
2009 40.6 19.3 1.7 17.4 3.0 14.4 0.2 21.3 40.6 3.6 0.3 4.5 18.4 8.1 5.7 113.7
2010 41.2 22.8 2.9 19.2 3.3 15.9 0.7 18.4 41.2 6.8 0.3 14.9 20.2 7.5 -8.5 128.4
2011E 48.0 27.9 9.3 18.3 3.8 14.5 0.3 20.2 48.0 6.9 0.5 17.5 20.7 0.0 2.4 164.5
2012F 53.6 32.9 11.1 21.3 6.3 15.0 0.5 20.7 53.6 7.5 0.5 15.5 21.2 0.0 8.9 172.2
2007 -134.1 -330.7 -371.8 17.0 24.1 196.6 -134.1 138.4 18.7 220.1 38.3 -87.8 -461.7
2008 -112.2 -345.3 -426.1 53.5 27.3 233.1 -112.2 175.1 42.7 210.8 37.6 -159.5 -419.0
2009 27.2 -186.6 -261.1 43.9 30.6 213.8 27.2 114.2 38.7 259.3 36.1 -22.6 -398.5
2010 49.4 -210.9 -305.4 60.2 34.3 260.3 49.4 185.1 24.0 375.7 38.2 -102.0 -471.6
2011E 251.8 -125.9 -201.1 42.1 33.0 377.7 251.8 116.0 35.9 525.7 49.4 -87.4 -387.8
2012F 436.9 -90.8 -170.7 48.1 31.7 527.7 436.9 105.0 35.2 555.7 50.6 30.1 -339.7
HONG KONG
$bn Funding need (including short-term debt amortization) Funding need (excluding short-term debt amortization) Current account deficit FDI outflows Medium- and long-term debt amortization Short-term debt amortization Funding sources (including gross short-term borrowing) FDI inflows Net portfolio inflows Short-term loans Medium- and long-term borrowings Other capital flows / errors & omissions Changes in reserves (- indicates increase)
Source: Census and Statistics Department, Credit Suisse
2007 420.6 54.3 -25.6 61.3 18.7 366.3 420.6 54.5 -2.8 507.9 32.9 -157.1 -14.7
2008 551.9 42.6 -30.6 60.0 13.3 509.3 551.9 63.0 -37.6 469.0 7.1 84.2 -33.9
2009 519.8 48.8 -18.4 57.0 10.3 470.9 519.8 62.0 -14.5 496.7 2.1 47.1 -73.7
2010 549.1 55.5 -12.5 56.6 11.4 493.6 549.1 61.6 -22.1 631.7 11.8 -104.1 -29.7
2011E 691.6 60.0 -7.8 56.0 11.8 631.7 691.6 61.9 -21.7 644.5 10.2 23.0 -26.2
2012F 707.9 63.4 -4.8 56.4 11.9 644.5 707.9 62.1 -21.4 657.3 10.5 22.9 -23.6
171
14 March 2012
2007 106.7 75.0 17.0 18.8 39.1 31.7 106.7 34.7 29.5 64.0 48.9 20.9 1.1 -92.4 44.8
2008 143.8 100.0 28.7 17.9 42.6 43.8 143.8 37.7 -14.0 57.4 41.8 -9.2 9.1 21.0 46.0
2009 152.2 106.3 38.4 14.4 53.5 45.9 152.2 33.1 32.4 61.0 53.6 -4.0 1.0 -24.9 43.0
2010 180.3 115.6 44.3 16.2 55.1 64.7 180.3 23.3 32.0 67.6 75.7 -9.0 -1.2 -8.1 52.5
2011E 206.0 136.0 58.0 18.0 60.0 70.0 206.0 33.0 15.0 69.5 84.0 -5.0 4.5 5.0 60.0
2012F 209.0 136.0 53.0 20.0 63.0 73.0 209.0 30.0 28.0 78.0 88.0 0.0 -5.0 -10.0 70.0
INDONESIA
$bn Funding need (including short-term debt amortization) Funding need (excluding short-term debt amortization) Current account deficit Medium- and long-term debt amortization FDI outflows Short-term debt (original maturity) at beginning of period Unclassified capital outflows and E&O Funding sources (including gross short-term borrowing) FDI inflows Portfolio inflows Portfolio equity inflows Portfolio debt inflows Loan disbursements Short-term debt inflows Other inflows Change in reserves (- indicates increase) Memo items: BI FX reserves, including valuation changes ST external debt (remaining maturity) Central bank FX reserves-to-ST external debt (%) Rollover ratios (MLT debt, times)* Rollover ratios (ST debt, times)*
Source: Bank Indonesia, CEIC.
2007 22.4 10.2 -10.4 14.4 4.7 12.2 1.5 22.4 6.9 5.6 3.3 2.2 13.2 18.7 -13.2 -14.3 56.9 26.6 187.8 0.9 1.5
2008 45.7 27.0 -0.1 15.5 5.9 18.7 5.7 45.7 9.3 1.7 0.0 1.7 18.3 20.5 -11.2 5.3 51.6 34.2 145.0 1.2 1.1
2009 41.3 20.8 -10.7 17.1 2.2 20.5 12.2 41.3 4.9 10.5 0.8 9.7 19.0 21.0 -10.0 -14.5 66.1 37.6 171.1 1.1 1.0
2010 42.6 20.6 -5.1 17.6 2.7 22.0 5.4 42.6 13.4 15.7 2.1 13.6 17.9 25.4 -15.4 -30.1 96.2 39.6 223.7 1.0 1.2
2011E 48.0 24.0 -2.1 21.0 7.7 24.0 -2.6 48.0 18.2 5.6 -0.3 5.9 18.0 27.0 -10.6 -15.8 112.0 45.0 243.5 0.9 1.1
2012F 58.0 32.0 6.5 24.0 4.0 26.0 -2.5 58.0 16.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 19.0 24.0 -17.0 12.0 100.0 50.0 212.8 0.8 0.9
*1998-2003 BOP data were based on old classification. Short-term debt figures came from IMF 2008 Article IV Consultation report published September 2008 on Indonesia.
172
14 March 2012
2007 147.1 33.3 -21.8 19.7 35.4 113.7 147.1 1.8 -26.1 146.4 44.2 -4.0 -15.1
2008 216.4 56.2 -3.2 20.3 39.1 160.2 216.4 3.3 -2.4 154.4 0.0 4.7 56.4
2009 164.8 14.9 -32.8 17.2 30.5 149.9 164.8 2.2 49.7 153.3 1.3 26.9 -68.7
2010 176.8 27.6 -29.4 23.3 33.7 149.2 176.8 1.1 42.5 159.2 5.4 -4.5 -27.0
2011E 166.4 27.0 -27.7 20.4 34.3 139.4 166.4 4.7 10.3 154.4 10.5 0.4 -13.9
2012F 172.1 36.0 -21.5 22.4 35.2 136.1 172.1 7.7 9.3 146.1 8.5 7.0 -6.5
MALAYSIA
$bn Funding need (including short-term debt amortization) Funding need (excluding short-term debt amortization) Current account deficit FDI outflows Other investment outflows Short-term external debt (beginning of period) Other and unclassified items Funding sources (including gross short-term borrowing) FDI inflows Net portfolio inflows Short-term external borrowing Change in net reserves (- indicates increase) Memo items: BNM FX reserves, including forward purchases Short-term external debt (end of period) Medium- and long-term external debt Actual and assumed debt rollover ratios (short-term debt, times)
Source: Bank Negara Malaysia, CEIC, Credit Suisse
2007 17.2 5.1 -29.8 -11.3 14.0 12.1 20.9 17.2 8.6 5.4 16.5 -13.2 101.1 16.5 40.2 1.4
2008 10.1 -6.4 -39.5 -15.0 2.4 16.5 30.8 10.1 7.2 -25.6 23.0 5.5 91.4 23.0 45.3 1.4
2009 20.3 -2.7 -31.8 -7.9 16.5 23.0 12.6 20.3 1.4 0.2 22.6 -3.9 96.7 22.6 45.4 1.0
2010 51.0 28.4 -27.1 -13.4 16.8 22.6 38.7 51.0 9.1 15.1 25.9 0.8 106.5 25.9 48.2 1.1
2011E 27.0 1.0 -32.0 -14.9 -0.8 25.9 33.9 27.0 10.9 10.2 33.0 -27.1 133.6 33.0 48.0 1.3
2012F 47.0 14.0 -33.2 -14.7 15.0 33.0 32.2 47.0 13.4 10.0 40.0 -16.4 150.0 40.0 50.0 1.2
173
14 March 2012
2009 7.2 -1.7 -9.4 0.4 4.1 1.3 2.9 1.6 -3.9 5.4 -1.7 2.0 0.3 -1.1 1.4 3.8 2.1 -0.5 -8.7 44.2 8.4 529.4
2010 10.3 1.9 -8.5 0.5 3.8 1.7 2.1 1.4 2.7 2.0 1.9 1.7 4.6 2.6 2.0 5.0 2.5 0.4 -11.0 62.3 8.8 711.5
2011E 14.4 5.6 -4.7 0.5 4.7 2.7 2.0 1.2 2.0 2.0 5.6 1.5 4.9 0.3 4.6 10.0 2.0 0.0 -10.3 75.3 8.8 860.0
2012F 14.6 5.9 -6.4 0.2 5.5 3.0 2.5 1.5 3.0 2.1 5.9 1.4 4.5 1.5 3.0 4.5 4.0 0.0 -4.3 89.6 8.8 1023.4
1.3 3.2 1.2 2.7 2.9 4.6 3.1 1.5 7.3 1.6 0.2 0.0 33.8 9.9 340.9
-3.2 3.8 -3.0 0.3 1.5 -3.8 -1.2 -2.6 4.0 1.3 -1.2 -1.6 37.1 8.9 416.4
TAIWAN
$bn Funding need (including short-term debt amortization) Funding need (excluding short-term debt amortization) Current account deficit FDI outflows Medium- and long-term debt amortization Short-term debt amortization Funding sources (including gross short-term borrowing) FDI inflows Net portfolio inflows Short-term loans Medium- and long-term borrowings Other capital flows / errors and omissions Changes in reserves (- indicates increase)
Source: Central Bank of China, Credit Suisse
2007 67.6 -20.4 -35.2 11.1 3.7 88.0 67.6 7.8 -40.1 82.4 4.0 9.4 4.0
2008 72.3 -11.0 -27.5 10.3 6.2 83.3 72.3 5.4 -12.3 85.2 2.3 17.9 -26.3
2009 41.3 -37.5 -42.9 5.9 -0.5 78.8 41.3 2.8 -10.3 84.2 5.4 13.4 -54.1
2010 44.7 -23.5 -39.9 11.6 4.8 68.2 44.7 2.5 -20.7 84.2 -0.2 19.0 -40.2
2011E 64.9 -18.8 -41.3 12.8 9.7 83.7 64.9 -2.0 -35.7 87.9 -5.1 26.0 -6.2
2012F 65.6 -22.4 -38.2 13.8 2.0 87.9 65.6 0.0 -33.7 92.8 -0.2 11.7 -5.1
174
14 March 2012
2007 29.5 10.5 -15.7 3.0 19.5 1.6 18.0 19.1 4.4 0.0 -0.8 29.5 11.3 -6.7 -9.6 4.3 -1.4 20.4 -0.9 21.3 21.6 -17.1 87.6 21.6 61.9 2.8 59.1 1.0 1.1
2008 22.5 0.9 -1.6 4.1 13.2 1.0 12.1 21.6 -12.3 -0.2 -2.3 22.5 8.5 -2.1 0.4 -3.8 1.3 16.5 1.6 14.9 24.2 -24.7 111.0 24.2 65.2 3.4 61.8 1.3 1.1
2009 29.5 5.2 -20.3 4.2 11.0 0.9 10.2 24.2 -2.3 -0.2 12.8 29.5 4.9 -5.5 -8.2 1.7 1.0 21.1 3.4 17.7 33.1 -24.1 138.4 33.1 75.3 5.9 69.4 1.9 1.4
2010 30.2 -2.9 -14.8 5.5 9.4 1.2 8.2 33.1 5.9 -0.6 -8.4 30.2 9.7 9.2 0.7 2.6 5.9 25.2 6.7 18.5 17.5 -31.3 172.1 50.6 100.5 12.7 84.3 2.7 0.5
2011E 39.9 -10.7 -11.9 10.8 11.5 1.5 10.0 50.6 0.7 -5.0 -16.8 39.9 8.4 3.4 -0.5 0.4 3.5 19.9 -2.6 22.5 9.4 -1.2 175.1 60.0 106.6 10.1 96.8 1.7 0.2
2012F 57.0 -3.0 -2.0 6.0 10.7 1.2 9.5 60.0 1.5 -5.0 -14.2 57.0 9.5 2.5 -2.5 3.0 2.0 27.0 3.0 24.0 30.0 -12.0 190.0 90.0 112.0 16.5 111.3 2.5 1.0
175
14 March 2012
2009
$ bn 13.6 1.9 -4.7 6.6 8.3 6.6 1.7 1.7 3.3 13.6 1.7 0.7 1.7 1.3 8.2 % of GDP 4.4 0.6 -1.5 2.2 2.7 2.2 0.6 0.6 1.1 4.4 0.6 0.2 0.6 0.4 2.7
2010
$ bn 9.7 -0.7 -6.3 5.5 7.2 5.5 1.7 1.7 3.3 9.7 2.4 0.9 2.1 6.6 -2.3 % of GDP 2.6 -0.2 -1.7 1.5 1.9 1.5 0.5 0.5 0.9 2.6 0.7 0.3 0.6 1.8 -0.6
2011E
$ bn 21.4 7.4 -1.3 8.7 10.0 8.4 1.6 1.6 4.0 21.4 2.0 0.9 2.8 2.5 7.5 5.7 % of GDP 4.9 1.7 -0.3 2.0 2.3 1.9 0.4 0.4 0.9 4.9 0.5 0.2 0.6 0.6 1.7 1.3
2012F
$ bn 17.0 0.5 -9.5 9.9 11.8 7.0 4.7 1.7 3.0 4.8 17.0 2.0 0.9 2.9 3.3 5.7 2.2 % of GDP 3.6 0.1 -2.0 2.1 2.5 1.5 1.0 0.4 0.6 1.0 3.6 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.7 1.2 0.5
BRAZIL
Total borrowing requirements Overall fiscal deficit Primary fiscal deficit Interest payments Debt amortization Domestic debt External debt Funding sources New privatization proceeds Transfer of privatization proceeds from previous year External bonds IFIs Project finance Domestic debt issuance
2009
$ bn 214.3 54.6 -32.6 87.2 159.7 152.5 7.2 214.3 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 210.1 % of GDP 13.4 3.4 -2.0 5.4 10.0 9.5 0.5 13.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 13.2
2010
$ bn 262.4 52.7 -58.5 111.2 209.7 197.1 12.6 262.4 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 259.6 % of GDP 12.6 2.5 -2.8 5.3 10.0 9.4 0.6 12.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 12.4
2011E
$ bn 293.2 64.3 -76.7 141.0 228.9 221.5 7.4 293.2 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 291.5 % of GDP 11.9 2.6 -3.1 5.7 9.3 9.0 0.3 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 11.8
2012F
$ bn 298.5 58.0 -78.2 136.1 240.5 233.5 7.0 298.5 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 296.8 % of GDP 11.8 2.3 -3.1 5.4 9.5 9.3 0.3 11.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 11.8
CHILE
Total borrowing requirements Overall fiscal deficit Primary fiscal deficit Interest payments Debt amortization Domestic debt External debt Capitalization of state-owned companies Funding sources Domestic External*
2009
$ bn 12.1 7.3 6.5 0.8 2.7 2.3 0.5 2.1 12.1 2.4 9.7 % of GDP 7.5 4.5 4.0 0.5 1.7 1.4 0.3 1.3 7.5 1.5 6.0
2010
$ bn 1.6 1.0 -0.2 1.2 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.0 1.6 0.4 1.2 % of GDP 0.8 0.5 -0.1 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.6
2011E
$ bn -3.3 -3.3 -4.5 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -5.2 1.8 % of GDP -1.4 -1.4 -1.9 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 -1.4 -2.2 0.8
2012F
$ bn -0.3 -1.3 -2.8 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 -0.3 -0.3 0.0 % of GDP -0.1 -0.5 -1.1 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 -0.1 -0.1 0.0
*Includes resources from the Economic and Social Stabilization Fund and debt placements.
176
14 March 2012
2009
$ bn 17.2 10.1 2.6 7.5 7.0 5.8 1.2 17.2 2.1 1.5 13.6 % of GDP 7.3 4.3 1.1 3.2 3.0 2.5 0.5 7.3 0.9 0.6 5.8
2010
$ bn 19.7 11.2 2.9 8.3 8.5 6.8 1.7 19.7 2.1 3.3 13.2 1.1 % of GDP 6.8 3.9 1.0 2.9 2.9 2.4 0.6 6.8 0.7 1.2 4.6 0.4
2011E
$ bn 18.4 9.6 0.3 9.3 8.8 7.5 1.2 18.4 1.1 2.0 15.3 % of GDP 5.5 2.9 0.1 2.8 2.6 2.3 0.4 5.5 0.3 0.6 4.6
2012F
$ bn 20.1 11.2 0.0 11.2 8.9 7.0 1.9 20.1 1.1 3.0 16.0 % of GDP 5.2 2.9 0.0 2.9 2.3 1.8 0.5 5.2 0.3 0.8 4.2
MEXICO
Total borrowing requirements Overall fiscal deficit Primary fiscal deficit Interest payments Debt amortization Domestic debt External debt Funding sources Domestic External
2009
$ bn 73.2 20.3 0.9 19.4 53.8 50.3 3.5 73.2 64.4 8.8 % of GDP 8.3 2.3 0.1 2.2 6.1 5.7 0.4 8.3 7.3 1.0 % of GDP 12.0 1.0 -1.9 3.0 6.8 5.9 0.9 4.1 12.0 4.1 3.4 4.5
2010
$ bn 92.2 30.0 9.3 20.7 62.2 59.1 3.1 92.2 80.8 11.4 % of GDP 8.9 2.9 0.9 2.0 6.0 5.7 0.3 8.9 7.8 1.1 % of GDP 5.2 1.9 -0.8 2.7 3.3 2.6 0.7 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.8 4.4
2011E
$ bn 87.7 28.8 6.9 21.9 58.8 56.5 2.3 87.7 83.1 4.6 % of GDP 7.6 2.5 0.6 1.9 5.1 4.9 0.2 7.6 7.2 0.4 % of GDP 3.9 2.3 -0.1 2.4 1.6 -0.1 1.7 0.0 3.9 0.8 0.5 2.6
2012F
$ bn 95.9 30.7 7.4 23.4 65.2 64.0 1.2 95.9 88.6 7.4 % of GDP 7.8 2.5 0.6 1.9 5.3 5.2 0.1 7.8 7.2 0.6 % of GDP 4.3 2.1 -0.6 2.7 2.2 0.8 1.3 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.9 3.4
PANAMA
Total borrowing requirements Overall fiscal deficit* Primary fiscal deficit Interest payments Debt amortization Domestic debt External debt Buyback of domestic debt Funding sources Issuance of foreign debt IFIs + bilateral debt Issuance of domestic debt
*Non-financial public sector
2009
$ bn 2.9 0.3 -0.5 0.7 1.6 1.4 0.2 1.0 2.9 1.0 0.8 1.1
2010
$ bn 1.4 0.5 -0.2 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.2 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.2 1.2
2011E
$ bn 1.2 0.7 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.2 0.2 0.2 0.8
2012F
$ bn 1.4 0.7 -0.2 0.9 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.3 1.1
177
14 March 2012
2009
$ bn 3.2 2.0 0.4 1.7 1.2 0.3 1.0 3.2 0.9 1.2 1.1 % of GDP 2.6 1.6 0.3 1.3 1.0 0.2 0.7 2.6 0.7 0.9 0.9
2010
$ bn 2.3 0.8 -0.9 1.7 1.5 0.5 1.0 2.3 -0.5 1.4 1.3 % of GDP 1.5 0.5 -0.6 1.1 1.0 0.4 0.6 1.5 -0.3 0.9 0.9
2011E
$ bn -1.8 -3.2 -5.1 1.9 1.4 0.5 0.8 -1.8 -2.8 0.0 0.9 % of GDP -1.0 -1.8 -2.9 1.1 0.8 0.3 0.5 -1.0 -1.6 0.0 0.5
2012F
$ bn 0.3 -1.4 -3.5 2.2 1.7 0.5 1.2 0.3 -1.9 1.0 1.2 % of GDP 0.2 -0.7 -1.8 1.1 0.9 0.3 0.6 0.2 -0.9 0.5 0.6
VENEZUELA
Total borrowing requirement Overall fiscal deficit* Primary fiscal deficit Interest payments Debt amortization External Domestic Funding sources Dollar denominated debt-placements Bolivar denominated debt placements Public sector external assets
Source: National authorities, Credit Suisse
2009
$ bn 32.3 28.6 23.8 4.8 3.7 2.6 1.1 32.3 9.8 10.6 11.9 % of GDP 9.8 8.7 7.2 1.5 1.1 0.8 0.3 9.8 3.0 3.2 3.6
2010
$ bn 13.8 11.7 8.5 3.2 2.1 1.6 0.5 13.8 6.0 8.6 -0.9 % of GDP 5.8 4.9 3.6 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.2 5.8 2.5 3.7 -0.4
2011E
$ bn 22.5 17.4 11.9 5.5 5.1 4.7 0.4 22.5 17.6 15.8 -10.9 % of GDP 7.1 5.5 3.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 0.1 7.1 5.6 5.0 -3.5
2012F
$ bn 37.6 35.6 26.3 9.3 2.0 0.7 1.3 37.6 9.0 15.0 13.6 % of GDP 8.9 8.5 6.3 2.2 0.5 0.2 0.3 8.9 2.1 3.6 3.2
*Consolidation of Central Government, PDVSA, Non-Financial Public Enterprises, Venezuelan Social Security Institute and Deposit and Guarantee Fund.
2009
$ bn 20.5 11.1 8.8 2.3 5.2 5.2 0.0 4.2 20.5 13.5 10.6 2.9 4.8 0.6 3.8 -2.2 191.7 % of GDP 10.7 5.8 4.6 1.2 2.7 2.7 0.0 2.2 10.7 7.0 5.5 1.5 2.5 0.3 2.0 -1.1
2010
$ bn 18.1 9.0 6.3 2.7 4.3 4.3 0.0 4.8 18.1 11.2 8.7 2.5 6.0 0.5 -0.8 1.2 192.4 % of GDP 9.4 4.7 3.3 1.4 2.2 2.2 0.0 2.5 9.4 5.8 4.5 1.3 3.1 0.3 -0.4 0.6
2011E
$ bn 21.4 9.1 6.1 3.0 6.3 6.3 0.0 6.0 21.4 7.0 7.0 0.0 8.0 0.4 5.5 0.5 217.5 % of GDP 9.9 4.2 2.8 1.4 2.9 2.9 0.0 2.8 9.9 3.2 3.2 0.0 3.7 0.2 2.5 0.2
2012F
$ bn 20.8 6.6 3.7 2.9 6.2 6.2 0.0 8.0 20.8 12.0 10.0 2.0 8.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 207.3 % of GDP 10.1 3.2 1.8 1.4 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.9 10.1 5.8 4.8 1.0 3.9 0.1 0.0 0.2
178
14 March 2012
2009
$ bn 25.8 5.8 -0.1 6.0 11.7 10.3 1.4 8.3 na na 25.8 6.5 5.1 1.4 9.2 10.0 3.5 -3.4 na % of GDP 20.4 4.6 -0.1 4.7 9.2 8.1 1.1 6.6 na na 20.4 5.1 4.0 1.1 7.3 7.9 2.8 -2.7 na
2010
$ bn 24.6 5.4 0.1 5.3 10.0 8.1 1.9 9.2 na na 24.6 12.2 10.2 2.0 8.0 0.0 0.1 4.3 na % of GDP 19.1 4.2 0.1 4.1 7.8 6.3 1.5 7.2 na na 19.1 9.5 8.0 1.6 6.2 0.0 0.1 3.3 na
2011E
$ bn 25.7 6.3 0.7 5.6 11.4 5.9 5.5 8.0 2.6 11.2 39.6 16.1 10.3 5.8 6.7 0.0 -0.6 1.5 15.9 % of GDP 18.3 4.5 0.5 4.0 8.1 4.2 3.9 5.7 1.8 8.0 28.1 11.5 7.3 4.1 4.8 0.0 -0.4 1.0 11.3
2012F
$ bn 20.5 3.7 -1.6 5.3 10.1 4.0 6.1 6.7 na 2.7 23.2 11.0 8.0 3.0 7.0 0.0 5.0 0.2 na % of GDP 15.1 2.7 -1.2 3.9 7.5 3.0 4.5 5.0 na 2.0 17.1 8.1 5.9 2.2 5.2 0.0 3.7 0.1 na
ISRAEL
Total borrowing requirements Overall fiscal deficit Primary fiscal deficit Interest payments* Debt amortization Domestic External Funding sources Bond issuance Domestic External Privatization Other domestic financing Change in cash reserves** (- indicates increase) Memo item: GDP ($bn)
2009
$ bn 24.7 10.0 -0.5 10.5 14.7 12.7 2.0 24.7 26.1 22.9 3.2 0.6 0.6 -2.7 194.9 % of GDP 12.7 5.1 -0.3 5.4 7.5 6.5 1.0 12.7 13.4 11.8 1.6 0.3 0.3 -1.4
2010
$ bn 27.0 8.1 -3.3 11.4 18.9 15.5 3.4 27.0 22.2 18.9 3.3 1.2 1.4 2.3 217.8 % of GDP 12.4 3.7 -1.5 5.2 8.7 7.1 1.6 12.4 10.2 8.7 1.5 0.5 0.6 1.1
2011E
$ bn 30.1 8.0 -4.5 12.5 22.1 20.7 1.4 30.1 25.6 24.1 1.5 2.0 1.4 1.1 242.9 % of GDP 12.4 3.3 -1.8 5.1 9.1 8.5 0.6 12.4 10.5 9.9 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.4
2012F
$ bn 26.9 8.0 -4.6 12.5 19.0 16.7 2.3 26.9 24.4 22.1 2.4 0.5 2.0 0.0 239.9 % of GDP 11.2 3.3 -1.9 5.2 7.9 7.0 0.9 11.2 10.2 9.2 1.0 0.2 0.8 0.0
*Including repayment of loans to National Insurance Institute.**Positive/negative number indicates a decline/increase in the governments cash reserves.
179
14 March 2012
2009
$bn 4.6 1.6 1.1 0.5 2.0 1.7 0.3 1.0 4.6 5.4 4.9 0.5 1.0 0.1 -2.0 % of GDP 4.0 1.4 1.0 0.4 1.7 1.5 0.2 0.9 4.0 4.7 4.2 0.4 0.9 0.1 -1.7
2010
$ bn 0.4 -2.5 -3.2 0.6 1.9 1.9 0.0 1.0 0.4 5.6 4.6 1.0 0.9 0.1 -6.2 % of GDP 0.3 -1.7 -2.2 0.4 1.3 1.3 0.0 0.7 0.3 3.8 3.1 0.7 0.6 0.1 -4.2
2011E
$ bn -1.0 -4.3 -5.2 0.9 2.4 2.4 0.0 0.9 -1.0 7.5 7.5 0.0 0.7 0.1 -9.3 % of GDP -0.6 -2.5 -3.0 0.5 1.4 1.4 0.0 0.5 -0.6 4.3 4.3 0.0 0.4 0.0 -5.3
2012F
$ bn -1.5 -4.8 -6.0 1.2 2.6 2.6 0.0 0.7 -1.5 5.7 5.7 0.0 0.8 0.0 -8.0 % of GDP -0.7 -2.4 -3.0 0.6 1.3 1.3 0.0 0.3 -0.7 2.8 2.8 0.0 0.4 0.0 -4.0
POLAND
Total borrowing requirements General government deficit ESA95 Primary deficit Interest payments Principal payments Domestic bonds External bonds and loans on foreign markets Stock of T-bills at the beginning of the period Funding sources Bond issuance Domestic External Stock of T-bills at the end of the period Other international financing Change in funds held by MoF (- indicates increase) Other domestic financing (including loans and privatization proceeds) Memo item: GDP ($bn)
2009
$ bn 65.5 31.4 20.2 11.2 17.1 12.8 4.3 17.0 65.5 29.8 21.5 8.3 16.6 2.0 -0.4 17.5 430.5 % of GDP 15.2 7.3 4.7 2.6 4.0 3.0 1.0 3.9 15.2 6.9 5.0 1.9 3.9 0.5 -0.1 4.1
2010
$ bn 75.5 36.6 24.4 12.2 22.3 19.4 2.9 16.6 75.5 52.6 43.2 9.4 9.4 2.5 2.3 8.7 469.2 % of GDP 16.1 7.8 5.2 2.6 4.8 4.1 0.6 3.5 16.1 11.2 9.2 2.0 2.0 0.5 0.5 1.9
2011E
$ bn 65.5 29.1 14.0 15.1 27.0 25.0 2.0 9.4 65.5 43.2 36.3 6.9 3.5 3.1 -5.6 21.3 520.1 % of GDP 12.6 5.6 2.7 2.9 5.2 4.8 0.4 1.8 12.6 8.3 7.0 1.3 0.7 0.6 -1.1 4.1
2012F
$ bn 59.6 19.0 5.7 13.3 37.1 32.2 4.9 3.5 59.6 46.0 40.0 6.0 4.0 0.0 -0.4 10.0 515.0 % of GDP 11.6 3.7 1.1 2.6 7.2 6.3 1.0 0.7 11.6 8.9 7.8 1.2 0.8 0.0 -0.1 1.9
180
14 March 2012
2009
$ bn 79.3 72.1 66.6 5.5 7.2 3.1 4.1 79.3 16.2 16.2 0 0 0.2 0.1 62.9 62.9 1,231.9 % of GDP 6.5 5.9 5.4 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.3 6.5 1.3 1.3 0 0 0 0 5.1 5.1
2010
$ bn 71 61.9 52.7 9.3 9.1 7.8 1.3 71 33.6 28.3 5.3 0.5 -20.7 -0.1 57.7 31.9 1,465.1 % of GDP 4.8 4.2 3.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.1 4.8 2.3 1.9 0.4 0 -1.4 0 3.9 2.2
2011E
$ bn -2.3 -14.7 -23.7 9 12.4 10.9 1.5 -2.3 47.1 47.1 0.0 4.3 -9.9 -3.6 -40.2 -39.9 1,850.4 % of GDP -0.1 -0.8 -1.3 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.1 -0.1 2.5 2.5 0.0 0.2 -0.5 -0.2 -2.2 -2.1
2012F
$ bn 16.4 1.8 -11.3 13.1 14.6 13.5 1.1 16.4 41 37.6 3.4 0 6.6 -0.7 -30.5 -30.5 2,051.5 % of GDP 0.8 0.1 -0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.8 2.0 1.8 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 -1.5 -1.5
SOUTH AFRICA*
Consolidated budget borrowing requirements Overall fiscal deficit Primary fiscal deficit Interest payments Debt amortizations Domestic debt T-bill stock at the end of the previous year External debt Funding sources External Domestic debt T-bills Net extraordinary receipts Change in cash reserves (- indicates increase) Memo item: GDP ($bn), fiscal year*
*Fiscal year starting on 1 April of the year specified in the column heading.
2009
$ bn 29.7 20.4 13.1 7.3 9.3 1.7 6.5 1.1 29.7 4.1 16.9 11.8 0.7 -3.9 312.3 % of GDP 9.5 6.5 4.2 2.3 3.0 0.6 2.1 0.3 9.5 1.3 5.4 3.8 0.2 -1.2
2010
$ bn 34.0 16.2 7.0 9.2 17.8 1.9 15.5 0.4 34.0 0.7 17.8 20.9 0.3 -5.8 383.6 % of GDP 8.9 4.2 1.8 2.4 4.6 0.5 4.0 0.1 8.9 0.2 4.6 5.5 0.1 -1.5
2011E
$ bn 42.1 19.8 9.5 10.3 22.3 2.1 19.7 0.5 42.1 1.6 20.8 21.9 0.2 -2.4 412.5 % of GDP 10.2 4.8 2.3 2.5 5.4 0.5 4.8 0.1 10.2 0.4 5.0 5.3 0.0 -0.6
2012F
$ bn 46.5 20.1 8.3 11.7 26.5 4.1 20.8 1.5 46.5 0.5 25.2 16.3 0.0 4.5 436.1 % of GDP 10.7 4.6 1.9 2.7 6.1 0.9 4.8 0.4 10.7 0.1 5.8 3.7 0.0 1.0
181
14 March 2012
2009
$ bn 106.0 43.7 9.3 34.4 53.3 47.9 5.4 9.0 106.0 84.5 80.7 3.8 9.0 12.8 3.5 -3.9 % of GDP 17.2 7.1 1.5 5.6 8.7 7.8 0.9 1.5 17.2 13.7 13.1 0.6 1.5 2.1 0.6 -0.6
2010
$ bn 133.9 36.0 3.6 32.5 88.6 81.4 7.1 9.4 133.9 102.8 96.1 6.7 10.1 14.9 3.2 2.9 % of GDP 18.2 4.9 0.4 4.4 12.0 11.1 1.0 1.3 18.2 14.0 13.1 0.9 1.4 2.0 0.4 0.4
2011E
$ bn 80.8 15.8 -10.0 25.7 55.9 49.0 6.9 9.1 80.8 61.8 57.5 4.3 9.8 9.7 1.3 -1.8 % of GDP 10.6 2.1 -1.4 3.4 7.3 6.4 0.9 1.2 10.6 8.1 7.5 0.6 1.3 1.3 0.2 -0.2
2012F
$ bn 64.9 14.3 -15.0 29.3 41.6 36.0 5.6 9.0 64.9 52.2 47.7 4.5 9.0 2.8 1.0 0.0 % of GDP 8.1 1.8 -1.9 3.7 5.2 4.5 0.7 1.1 8.1 6.5 5.9 0.6 1.1 0.3 0.1 0.0
UKRAINE
Total borrowing requirement Overall fiscal deficit* Primary fiscal deficit Interest payments Total amortization payments Domestic debt External debt Naftogaz operational deficit Funding sources External Domestic financing sources, of which Gross domestic borrowing Drawdowns on fiscal deposits Privatization Memo item: GDP ($bn)
*Excluding bank recapitalization costs. Source: National authorities, Credit Suisse
2009
$ bn 14.4 5.6 3.8 1.7 5.8 3.3 2.5 3.0 14.4 6.2 8.0 2.1 5.7 0.2 113.7 % of GDP 12.7 4.9 3.3 1.5 5.1 2.9 2.2 2.6 12.7 5.5 7.0 1.8 5.0 0.2
2010
$ bn 13.2 7.0 5.0 2.0 4.3 3.5 0.8 1.9 13.2 5.5 7.3 5.4 -1.9 0.4 128.4 % of GDP 10.3 5.5 3.9 1.6 3.4 2.7 0.6 1.5 10.3 4.3 5.7 4.2 -1.5 0.3
2011E
$ bn 11.4 2.9 0.0 2.9 5.7 4.0 1.7 2.8 11.4 3.4 6.5 6.7 -0.2 1.4 164.5 % of GDP 6.9 1.8 0.0 1.8 3.5 2.4 1.0 1.7 6.9 2.1 4.0 4.1 -0.1 0.9
2012F
$ bn 13.2 4.7 0.9 3.8 7.6 3.8 3.8 0.9 13.2 3.5 8.3 7.5 0.8 1.4 172.2 % of GDP 7.7 2.7 0.5 2.2 4.4 2.2 2.2 0.5 7.7 2.0 4.8 4.4 0.5 0.8
182
14 March 2012
2009
$ bn 191.8 114.0 76.8 37.2 77.8 77.6 0.2 191.8 191.8 % of GDP 3.8 2.2 1.5 0.7 1.5 1.5 0.0 3.8 3.8
2010
$ bn 179.3 96.6 53.7 42.8 82.7 82.4 0.3 179.3 179.3 % of GDP 3.1 1.6 0.9 0.7 1.4 1.4 0.0 3.1 3.1
2011E
$ bn 478.0 80.0 28.6 51.4 398.0 397.7 0.3 478.0 478.0 % of GDP 6.8 1.1 0.4 0.7 5.7 5.7 0.0 6.8 6.8
2012F
$ bn 543.9 127.7 70.9 56.8 416.2 415.9 0.3 543.9 543.9 % of GDP 6.6 1.6 0.9 0.7 5.1 5.1 0.0 6.6 6.6
HONG KONG
Total borrowing requirement Overall fiscal deficit Primary fiscal deficit Interest payments Debt amortization Domestic External Government bond program Funding sources Drawdown on fiscal reserves Domestic debt issuance Memo items: Fiscal reserves (year-end, $bn) GDP ($bn) Average exchange rate (USDHKD)
2009
$ bn -3.0 -3.3 -3.4 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 -3.0 -3.0 0.0 66.8 209.3 7.8 % of GDP -1.4 -1.6 -1.6 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 -1.4 -1.4 0.0
2010
$ bn -8.1 -9.6 -9.7 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.3 1.0 -8.1 -9.1 1.0 75.5 223.3 7.8 % of GDP -3.6 -4.3 -4.3 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.5 -3.6 -4.1 0.5
2011E
$ bn -6.7 -8.6 -8.6 0.1 -0.1 0.0 -0.1 1.9 -6.7 -8.7 1.9 84.1 242.8 7.8 % of GDP -2.8 -3.5 -3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 -2.8 -3.6 0.8
2012F
$ bn 1.7 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.7 0.4 1.3 83.7 258.3 7.8 % of GDP 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.7 0.2 0.5
INDIA*
Total borrowing requirements General Government fiscal deficit (incl. disinvestment proceeds) o/w Central government fiscal deficit (incl. disinvestment proceeds) Primary fiscal balance Interest payments Debt amortization Funding sources Domestic Debt issuance Others (1) Foreign Borrowings (2) Memo items: GDP ($bn) Average exchange rate (USDINR) Disinvestment proceeds (3)
2009
$ bn 146.6 131.9 87.2 42.4 44.8 14.7 146.6 143.1 130.3 12.9 3.5 1,383.1 47.4 5.5 % of GDP 10.6 9.5 6.3 3.1 3.2 1.1 10.6 10.3 9.4 0.9 0.3
2010
$ bn 157.7 127.9 85.1 32.3 52.8 29.7 157.7 152.7 133.3 19.5 4.9 1,595.4 45.6 5.0 % of GDP 9.1 7.4 4.9 1.9 3.1 1.7 9.1 8.8 7.7 1.1 0.3
2011E
$ bn 207.0 148.0 102.0 43.0 59.0 59.0 207.0 197.0 172.0 25.0 10.0 1,811.6 49.0 0.7 % of GDP 11.4 8.2 5.6 2.4 3.3 3.3 8.9 10.9 9.5 1.4 0.6
2012F
$ bn 222.0 175.0 123.0 48.0 75.0 47.0 222.0 207.0 179.0 28.0 15.0 2,118.3 47.0 8.5 % of GDP 10.5 8.3 5.8 2.3 3.5 2.2 8.9 9.8 8.5 1.3 0.7
0.4
0.3
0.0
0.4
* Fiscal year beginning April. For instance, 2010 is April 2010 to March 2011. (1) 'Others' includes small savings, state provident funds and changes in cash. (2) Foreign borrowings are net of repayments. (3) The central government has decided to include proceeds from disinvestments as revenue in calculating the fiscal deficit. Proceeds are to be used to fund certain social sector schemes that lead to capital formation. This is effective from 2009.
183
14 March 2012
2009
$ bn 19.0 8.4 -0.6 9.0 10.6 6.6 4.1 19.0 4.5 2.5 2.0 12.0 3.7 0.0 2.5 542.2 10,353.9 % of GDP 3.5 1.6 -0.1 1.7 2.0 1.2 0.7 3.5 0.8 0.5 0.4 2.2 0.7 0.0 0.5
2010
$ bn 18.2 5.2 -5.3 10.5 13.0 5.9 7.1 18.2 5.7 2.4 3.3 15.5 5.4 0.0 -3.0 707.5 9,078.3 % of GDP 2.6 0.7 -0.6 1.4 1.8 0.8 1.0 2.6 0.8 0.3 0.5 2.2 0.8 0.0 -0.4
2011E
$ bn 22.1 10.1 1.7 8.4 12.0 7.0 5.0 22.1 8.1 3.0 5.1 16.0 3.0 0.0 -2.0 844.1 8,799.3 % of GDP 2.6 1.2 0.2 1.0 1.4 0.8 0.6 2.6 1.0 0.4 0.6 1.9 0.4 0.0 -0.2
2012F
$ bn 33.4 18.4 4.6 13.8 15.0 7.0 8.0 33.4 10.0 3.5 6.5 25.0 2.5 0.0 -1.6 922.5 9,059.0 % of GDP 3.6 2.0 0.5 1.5 1.6 0.8 0.9 3.6 1.1 0.4 0.7 2.7 0.3 0.0 -0.2
KOREA
Total borrowing requirement Overall fiscal deficit Primary deficit Interest payments Debt amortization Domestic External Funding sources Domestic External Memo items: GDP ($bn) Average exchange rate (USDKRW)
2009
$ bn 61.7 22.3 9.8 12.5 39.4 37.2 2.2 61.7 59.3 2.4 829.6 1,281.4 % of GDP 7.4 2.7 1.2 1.5 4.8 4.5 0.3 7.4 7.1 0.3
2010
$ bn 52.9 5.4 -10.9 16.2 47.5 43.4 4.1 52.9 48.6 4.3 1011.6 1,159.4 % of GDP 5.2 0.5 -1.1 1.6 4.7 4.3 0.4 5.2 4.8 0.4
2011E
$ bn 42.6 -6.7 -23.3 16.6 49.3 44.5 4.8 42.6 37.6 5.0 1,133.8 1,108.0 % of GDP 3.8 -0.6 -2.1 1.5 4.4 3.9 0.4 3.8 3.3 0.4
2012F
$ bn 37.0 -11.2 -26.3 15.1 48.2 43.7 4.5 37.0 32.2 4.8 1,214.3 1,091.5 % of GDP 3.0 -0.9 -2.2 1.2 4.0 3.6 0.4 3.0 2.7 0.4
MALAYSIA
Total borrowing requirements Overall fiscal deficit Primary fiscal deficit Interest payments Debt amortization Domestic External Funding sources Domestic bonds issuance External loans Change in cash (- indicates increase) Memo items: GDP ($bn) Average exchange rate (USDMYR)
2009
$ bn 25.6 13.5 9.4 4.0 12.2 10.3 1.9 25.6 26.5 0.1 -1.1 193.0 3.5 % of GDP 13.3 7.0 4.9 2.1 6.3 5.3 1.0 13.3 13.8 0.1 -0.5
2010
$ bn 21.7 13.9 9.1 4.9 7.7 7.5 0.3 21.7 18.8 1.3 1.6 238.6 3.2 % of GDP 9.1 5.8 3.8 2.0 3.2 3.1 0.1 9.1 7.9 0.5 0.7
2011E
$ bn 30.7 14.0 7.9 6.1 16.7 14.8 1.9 30.7 29.5 2.1 -1.0 278.9 3.1 % of GDP 11.0 5.0 2.8 2.2 6.0 5.3 0.7 11.0 10.6 0.8 -0.3
2012F
$ bn 31.8 16.1 9.1 7.0 15.7 15.7 0.0 31.8 32.7 0.2 -1.0 322.4 2.9 % of GDP 9.9 5.0 2.8 2.2 4.9 4.9 0.0 9.9 10.1 0.1 -0.3
184
14 March 2012
2009
$ bn 13.4 6.2 0.4 5.8 7.2 5.1 2.1 13.4 5.3 2.0 3.2 6.7 0.0 1.4 % of GDP 8.0 3.7 0.2 3.5 4.3 3.0 1.2 8.0 3.1 1.2 1.9 4.0 0.0 0.8
2010
$ bn 15.8 7.0 0.5 6.5 8.8 6.0 2.8 15.8 5.7 1.3 4.4 10.9 0.0 -0.8 % of GDP 7.9 3.5 0.2 3.3 4.4 3.0 1.4 7.9 2.9 0.7 2.2 5.4 0.0 -0.4
2011E
$ bn 13.8 4.5 -3.6 8.1 9.4 6.7 2.7 13.8 3.9 1.1 2.8 8.3 0.1 1.5 % of GDP 6.2 2.0 -1.6 3.6 4.2 3.0 1.2 6.2 1.7 0.5 1.2 3.7 0.0 0.7
2012F
$ bn 17.0 6.0 -1.9 8.0 11.0 8.0 3.0 17.0 4.5 1.5 3.0 12.8 0.1 -0.4 % of GDP 7.1 2.5 -0.8 3.3 4.6 3.3 1.2 7.1 1.9 0.6 1.2 5.3 0.1 0.0
TAIWAN
Total borrowing requirement Overall fiscal deficit Primary fiscal deficit Interest payments Debt amortization Domestic External Funding sources Domestic External Memo items: GDP ($bn) Average exchange rate (USDTWD)
2009
$ bn 9.5 16.9 14.3 2.5 6.1 6.1 0.0 9.5 9.5 0.0 377.6 33.1 % of GDP 2.5 4.5 3.8 0.7 1.6 1.6 0.0 2.5 2.5 0.0
2010
$ bn 14.4 14.3 12.8 1.5 6.5 6.5 0.0 14.4 14.4 0.0 430.2 31.6 % of GDP 3.4 3.3 3.0 0.3 1.5 1.5 0.0 3.4 3.4 0.0
2011E
$ bn 19.9 14.5 13.6 0.9 5.4 5.4 0.0 19.9 19.9 0.0 466.3 29.5 % of GDP 4.3 3.1 2.9 0.2 1.2 1.2 0.0 4.3 4.3 0.0
2012F
$ bn 16.6 11.2 11.4 -0.2 5.4 5.4 0.0 16.6 16.6 0.0 479.1 29.8 % of GDP 3.5 2.3 2.4 0.0 1.1 1.1 0.0 3.5 3.5 0.0
THAILAND*
Total borrowing requirements Overall fiscal deficit** Primary fiscal deficit Interest payments Funding sources Net domestic borrowing Net foreign borrowing Change in cash (- indicates increase) Memo items: GDP ($bn) Average exchange rate (USDTHB)
Source: National authorities, Credit Suisse
2009
$ bn 14.7 14.7 11.5 3.3 14.7 14.5 -0.3 0.6 257.9 34.3 % of GDP 5.7 5.7 4.4 1.3 5.7 5.6 -0.1 0.2
2010
$ bn 2.7 2.7 -1.0 3.7 2.7 11.2 -0.1 -8.5 310.8 31.7 % of GDP 0.9 0.9 -0.3 1.2 0.9 3.6 0.0 -2.7
2011E
$ bn 9.3 9.3 4.1 5.1 9.3 8.9 0.0 0.4 342.2 30.8 % of GDP 2.7 2.7 1.2 1.5 2.7 2.6 0.0 0.1
2012F
$ bn 13.5 13.5 10.0 3.4 13.5 16.0 0.3 -2.9 382.8 30.8 % of GDP 3.5 3.5 2.6 0.9 3.5 4.2 0.1 -0.7
*Fiscal year ending September; **Including the principal payments on outstanding debts
185
14 March 2012
2012F Q3 3.7 5.2 5.0 1.8 3.4 3.8 0-.25 5.6 -3.3 0.2 0-0.1 77.0 0.6 4.2 2.7 1.50 1.34 1.9 -0.8 4.7 0.50 1.56 0.2 0.4 0-.25 0.90 Q4E 3.4 4.3 4.6 3.1 3.5 3.3 0-.25 -0.5 -1.4 -0.2 0-0.1 77.0 -2.2 0.5 3.1 1.00 1.30 -1.2 -1.9 4.6 0.50 1.55 0.2 -0.2 0-.25 0.94 Q1 3.3 4.0 3.9 2.2 3.1 2.5 0-.25 1.6 2.2 -0.3 0-0.1 74.3 -1.7 -2.2 2.5 0.75 1.23 -0.1 -2.3 3.4 0.50 1.46 2.1 -0.4 0-.25 1.00 Q2 3.4 4.6 3.6 2.2 4.1 1.5 0-.25 1.3 8.4 -0.4 0-0.1 74.2 0.1 -3.8 1.9 0.75 1.22 1.7 -0.7 3.0 0.50 1.45 2.8 -0.2 0-.25 1.01 Q3 3.4 4.6 3.6 2.3 3.6 1.3 0-.25 1.5 5.5 -0.4 0-0.1 74.9 0.8 -2.5 1.9 0.75 1.24 1.9 -0.4 2.9 0.50 1.46 4.6 0.8 0-.25 0.99 Q4 3.7 5.3 3.6 2.3 3.5 1.4 0-.25 1.7 6.4 -0.2 0-0.1 75.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 0.75 1.24 2.6 1.0 2.6 0.50 1.46 3.6 1.3 0-.25 0.99 10 5.1 9.6 4.4 3.0 5.3 1.6 0-.25 4.4 16.8 -1.0 0-0.1 ... 1.8 7.5 1.6 ... ... 1.8 2.1 3.3 0.5 ... 2.7 0.7 0.3 ...
Annual average 11E 3.8 5.3 4.7 1.7 4.2 3.1 0-.25 -0.8 -4.9 -0.3 0-0.1 ... 1.5 3.9 2.8 ... ... 0.8 -0.4 4.5 0.5 ... 1.9 0.3 0-.25 ... 12F 3.4 4.6 3.7 2.3 3.5 1.7 0-.25 1.4 5.6 -0.3 0-0.1 ... -0.5 -1.9 1.9 ... ... 0.7 -0.6 3.0 0.5 ... 2.0 0.4 0-.25 ... 13F 4.2 ... 3.6 2.0 3.0 1.7 0-.25 1.6 5.6 -0.1 0-0.1 0.0 1.7 3.4 1.6 ... ... 2.5 2.0 2.5 0.5 0.0 ... ... ... ...
Q2 3.9 4.9 4.9 1.3 3.8 3.3 0-.25 -2.0 -1.7 -0.3 0-0.1 80.6 0.7 4.2 2.8 1.25 1.45 0.4 -0.8 4.5 0.50 1.61 1.4 0.4 0.25 0.84
4.5 6.6 4.5 0.4 5.5 2.2 0-.25 -6.6 -13.1 -0.8 0-0.1 82.8 3.1 6.6 2.5 1.00 1.42 1.6 2.0 4.2 0.50 1.60 2.6 0.6 0.25 0.92
186
14 March 2012
(1) IMF World Economic Outlook projections as of September 2011. (2) Consensus estimates from Consensus Economics. (3) Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets are weighted by 2011 nominal GDP ($bn) figures. Source: Thomson Reuters DataStream, Consensus Economics, European Commission, IMF, National Statistical Offices, Credit Suisse
187
14 March 2012
(1) IMF World Economic Outlook projections as of September 2011. (2) Inflation ex. fresh food. (3) Consensus estimates from Consensus Economics. (4) Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets are weighted by 2011 nominal GDP ($bn) figures. Source: Thomson Reuters DataStream, Consensus Economics, European Commission, IMF, National Statistical Offices, Credit Suisse
188
14 March 2012
(1) IMF World Economic Outlook projections as of September 2011. (2) OECD estimates. (3) Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets are weighted by 2011 nominal GDP ($bn) figures. Source: Thomson Reuters DataStream, ECB, Eurostat, OECD, IMF, National Statistical Offices, Credit Suisse
189
14 March 2012
(1) IMF World Economic Outlook projections as of September 2011. (2) European Commission estimates; for 2010-2012 for Luxembourg and Sweden; for 2009-2012 for Ireland. (3) Fiscal year, general government (central + local + social security), special factors adjusted. (4) OECD estimates. (5) Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets are weighted by 2011 nominal GDP ($bn) figures. Source: Thomson Reuters DataStream, European Commission, OECD, IMF, National Statistical Offices, Credit Suisse
190
14 March 2012
(1) IMF World Economic Outlook projections as of September 2011. (2) Fiscal year, general government. (3) Fiscal year, general government (central + local + social security), special factors adjusted. (4) OECD estimates. (5) Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets are weighted by 2011 nominal GDP ($bn) figures. Source: Thomson Reuters DataStream, European Commission, OECD, IMF, National Statistical Offices, Credit Suisse
191
14 March 2012
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011E
2012F
2013F
2012F 5,510.9 472.4 2,517.0 255.0 386.0 1,229.9 32.5 197.2 420.8 5,778.8 207.3 135.3 239.9 206.9 515.0 2,051.5 627.7 411.2 801.7 172.2 410.2 14,427.3 8,202.8 258.3 2,118.3 923.5 1,214.3 322.4 241.1 284.6 479.1 382.8 25,717.0
2013F 6,020.1 512.8 2,788.0 265.1 426.6 1,387.6 34.6 215.9 389.5 6,092.8 214.3 141.8 251.5 221.2 536.0 2,144.9 678.6 450.8 853.5 172.4 427.8 16,648.8 9,600.5 276.1 2,496.0 1,018.1 1,363.6 358.0 271.0 315.2 510.9 439.5 28,761.7 4.4 9.2 3.2 5.6 4.7 3.2 7.2 6.8 10.3 6.0 6.3 3.5 4.9 9.7 3.6 6.4 5.6 5.3 8.4 2.7 4.9 8.6 10.4 7.1 9.5 5.7 4.0 5.3 4.8 7.4 4.7 4.6 7.4 11,742.0 25.8 24,823.7 43.8 5.3 8.5 4.0 4.6 6.7 5.2 8.5 7.7 9.9 7.0 6.8 4.0 5.6 10.7 6.2 8.2 3.2 5.6 6.9 7.3 9.9 10.1 12.7 7.0 9.6 5.5 5.2 5.8 5.2 8.8 5.4 5.1 8.7 13,793.9 28.0 27,689.0 45.0 5.9 8.7 6.1 4.6 6.9 3.3 12.1 8.9 8.8 6.0 6.1 1.0 5.5 8.7 6.8 8.5 2.0 5.5 4.7 7.6 3.2 10.9 14.2 6.4 9.3 6.3 5.1 6.3 6.6 8.9 6.0 4.9 9.0 16,829.6 30.3 30,928.1 46.4
Real GDP growth (% year on year) 4.4 6.8 5.2 3.7 3.5 1.2 10.1 9.8 5.3 3.7 2.5 0.6 4.0 3.3 5.1 5.2 4.2 3.6 0.7 2.3 3.3 7.2 9.6 2.3 6.8 6.0 2.3 4.6 4.2 1.7 0.7 2.5 5.9 20,228.8 33.1 33,415.2 47.8 -1.6 0.9 -0.3 -1.7 1.5 -6.2 3.9 0.9 -3.2 -4.0 -4.1 -6.3 0.8 1.2 1.7 -7.8 0.1 -1.5 -4.8 -14.8 -1.6 6.3 9.1 -2.6 8.5 4.6 0.3 -1.6 1.1 -1.0 -1.8 -2.2 2.6 19,119.0 33.1 34,397.2 49.1 6.4 9.2 7.5 5.2 4.3 5.5 7.6 8.8 -1.5 4.7 2.3 1.2 4.8 7.3 3.8 4.3 4.6 2.9 9.0 4.2 1.4 9.2 10.3 7.0 8.0 6.1 6.2 7.2 7.6 14.8 10.7 7.8 7.6 22,033.1 35.6 37,161.3 50.2 4.2 9.1 2.7 6.4 5.9 3.9 10.6 6.9 4.2 5.2 1.7 1.7 4.7 7.5 4.3 4.3 6.8 3.1 8.8 5.2 5.4 7.3 9.2 5.0 6.8 6.5 3.6 5.1 3.7 4.9 4.0 0.1 6.4 24,115.1 36.9 40,004.1 51.2 3.3 5.0 2.5 4.0 5.2 3.2 6.0 5.0 4.5 3.6 0.3 1.0 3.0 6.5 3.0 3.8 4.3 3.3 4.2 3.0 4.0 6.7 8.0 3.0 7.3 6.4 3.4 4.8 3.5 3.5 2.8 4.5 5.5 26,276.0 38.0 43,124.2 52.1 4.1 4.5 4.0 4.9 4.5 4.1 6.5 5.5 1.5 4.2 2.6 1.8 3.3 6.7 3.5 4.8 4.5 4.0 3.8 3.6 4.1 7.1 8.2 3.9 8.2 6.6 3.9 5.4 4.3 5.0 3.8 5.0 6.0 28,623.0 39.1 46,585.9 53.1
5,154.1 436.5 2,471.0 237.7 332.5 1,153.8 30.7 176.9 315.1 5,426.9 217.5 140.6 242.9 177.9 520.1 1,850.4 576.8 397.2 765.8 164.5 373.1 12,631.7 7,028.3 242.8 1,811.6 844.1 1,133.8 278.9 224.5 260.6 466.3 340.7 23,212.8
EM nominal GDP according to the IMF ($bn) (3) EM nominal GDP as a share of global nominal GDP (%)(3) EM PPP GDP according to the IMF ($bn) (3) EM PPP GDP as a share of global PPP GDP (%)(3)
Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets are weighted by 2011 nominal GDP ($bn) figures. The data for India are for the fiscal years. (1) Revised GDP series with base 2004-05. All historical ratios expressed as % of GDP may appear smaller since the revised GDP values in the new series (with base year of 2004) are higher. (2) Real GDP from 2001 has been rebased to 2000 = 100. (3) Based on GDP data (historical and forecast) from the IMFs latest World Economic Outlook. We have amended the group of countries that the IMF classifies as emerging markets to include the Czech Republic, Hong Kong, Israel, Korea, Singapore and Taiwan; note that the IMFs group of emerging markets countries includes many (typically small) economies that are not included in the table above. Source: the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, National Statistical Offices, IMF World Economic Outlook, IHS Global Insight, Credit Suisse
192
14 March 2012
Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets are weighted by 2011 nominal GDP ($bn) figures. Source: the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, National Statistical Offices, Credit Suisse
193
14 March 2012
Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets are weighted by 2011 nominal GDP ($bn) figures. The data for India are for the fiscal years. Source: the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, National Statistical Offices, IHS Global Insight, Credit Suisse
194
14 March 2012
Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets are weighted by 2011 nominal GDP ($bn) figures. The data for India are for the fiscal years. (1) Balance of payments numbers from 2004 onwards have been revised; exports & imports include credits & debits on net income, respectively, in 2000-03. Source: the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, National Statistical Offices, IHS Global Insight, Credit Suisse
195
14 March 2012
Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets are weighted by 2011 nominal GDP ($bn) figures. The data for India are for the fiscal years. (1) Balance of payments numbers from 2004 onwards have been revised; exports & imports include credits & debits on net income, respectively, in 2000-03. Source: the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, National Statistical Offices, IHS Global Insight, Credit Suisse
196
14 March 2012
-1.3 2.1 -3.6 4.5 -2.1 -0.1 -2.5 -0.5 4.1 4.2 -3.6 -7.9 -1.8 5.1 -4.1 9.0 18.4 -0.3 -0.6 -2.4 6.0 -1.6 -1.2 1.0 -6.5 -0.5 1.6 -4.2 -2.6 0.7 -0.6 0.3 -0.1
-1.4 1.9 -3.6 7.7 -2.4 0.1 0.5 1.8 -1.5 4.8 -2.6 -9.3 -0.4 7.4 -3.6 8.4 21.0 0.7 0.0 -1.4 9.2 -1.2 -0.8 4.0 -5.4 -0.9 1.5 -3.5 -1.1 0.0 -0.3 -0.7 0.4
-1.0 1.1 -2.8 8.2 -1.7 0.0 3.5 3.1 -2.6 3.2 -0.7 -5.1 0.4 4.4 -1.9 6.0 12.2 0.9 -1.2 -2.0 7.3 -0.3 0.6 7.7 -5.0 -1.3 1.9 -3.7 -1.5 2.8 -0.4 -1.6 0.5
-0.9 0.8 -2.0 4.3 -0.6 -0.1 0.4 2.4 -3.5 4.5 -2.7 -3.7 -2.1 1.8 -3.7 4.8 32.5 -1.1 -1.9 -3.2 13.5 -1.7 -0.4 0.1 -8.7 -0.1 -0.3 -4.8 -1.3 -0.3 -0.9 -1.0 0.0
-3.2 -1.6 -3.3 -4.5 -2.7 -2.3 -1.0 -1.5 -8.7 -6.6 -5.8 -4.6 -5.1 -1.4 -7.3 -6.3 -6.1 -6.5 -4.9 -6.2 -17.0 -3.5 -2.2 1.6 -9.5 -1.6 -2.7 -7.0 -3.7 -0.3 -4.5 -5.7 -4.3
-2.3 0.4 -2.5 -0.5 -3.1 -2.9 -1.9 -0.2 -4.9 -3.2 -4.8 -4.2 -3.7 2.6 -7.8 -3.5 5.2 -4.2 -3.2 -5.5 -5.9 -2.3 -1.6 4.3 -7.4 -0.7 -0.5 -5.8 -3.5 0.5 -3.3 -0.9 -2.6
-2.3 -2.1 -2.6 1.4 -2.2 -2.5 -2.3 1.8 -5.5 0.7 -4.2 -4.5 -3.3 3.3 -5.6 1.6 14.1 -4.8 -0.7 -1.8 4.8 -2.1 -1.1 3.5 -8.2 -1.2 0.6 -5.0 -2.0 0.7 -3.1 -2.7 -1.4
-2.3 -0.6 -2.3 0.5 -2.0 -2.5 -2.1 1.2 -8.5 0.0 -3.2 -2.7 -3.3 2.8 -3.7 -1.2 12.2 -4.6 -0.4 -2.7 5.7 -2.5 -1.6 -0.2 -8.3 -2.0 0.9 -5.0 -2.5 0.4 -2.3 -3.5 -1.8
-2.0 -1.1 -2.0 0.5 -1.9 -2.4 -1.6 0.8 -6.0 -0.9 -2.9 -1.5 -2.5 2.7 -2.9 -2.9 7.2 -4.0 -0.3 -2.1 3.6 -2.2 -1.4 -0.2 -7.8 -1.8 1.1 -4.5 -1.8 -0.2 -2.1 -2.5 -1.8
Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets are weighted by 2011 nominal GDP ($bn) figures. The data for India are for the fiscal years. (1) Narrow definition that excludes off-balance expenditures. (2) Consolidation of Central Government, PDVSA, Non-Financial Public Enterprises, Venezuelan Social Security Institute and Deposit and Guarantee Fund. (3) ESA95 represents consolidated fiscal accounts of the general government on an accrual basis, while the central government balance has a narrower definition and is reported on a cash basis. (4) ESA95 consolidated fiscal accounts of the general government excluding one-off transfers from pension funds to the government budget as revenues. (5) Consists of the state budget and the National Oil Fund. (6) Net of bank recapitalization costs. (7) Data for fiscal years starting 1 April. Selected data refer to the governments consolidated fiscal balances from 2009. (8) The definition of the consolidated government comprises the central government, extra-budgetary funds, state-owned enterprises, social security institutions and the Unemployment Insurance Fund. The data for government spending and gross debt are for the central government. (9) Excluding impact of bank recapitalization and transfers to Naftogaz. Estimate for 2011 expenditure includes 0.8% of GDP of additional allocations for settlement of VAT arrears accumulated in 2010. (10) Prior to 2006 and again effective from 2009, these estimates include revenue from disinvestments (in line with government methodology). (11) Refers to central government. (12) General government statistics as interpreted by the Korea government (13) Refers to the federal governments financial position. The government assumed an average oil price of $85 per barrel for 2011 in its 2011 budget. (14) General government statistics as interpreted by the Taiwan government. (15) Data for central government, based on cash basis prior to 2004, based on fiscal year ending September. Source: the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, National Statistical Offices, IHS Global Insight, Credit Suisse
197
14 March 2012
30.3 27.0 37.5 19.3 26.1 21.2 25.0 18.9 33.7 32.5 43.0 50.1 34.1 27.4 43.4 31.6 29.3 25.8 31.8 46.5 15.7 18.4 18.0 16.9 13.7 18.4 28.4 24.7 17.0 13.4 19.5 18.0 23.6
30.9 27.9 38.0 18.1 26.4 21.7 24.5 18.2 39.4 32.3 42.0 52.1 33.3 22.3 43.9 31.1 29.4 25.7 32.7 45.3 15.4 18.6 18.2 15.5 13.6 20.0 29.2 25.0 16.7 12.6 18.1 18.1 23.8
30.7 31.4 37.1 18.7 26.5 21.9 24.7 17.8 35.5 33.6 41.0 50.6 32.5 26.4 42.2 34.2 32.3 26.1 33.3 43.8 16.8 18.8 18.7 14.6 14.3 19.2 28.0 25.4 16.7 12.1 17.7 19.0 24.2
31.0 32.8 36.5 21.2 25.6 23.6 25.7 18.9 35.6 34.6 41.1 49.2 32.2 33.9 43.2 34.3 29.1 30.8 33.8 47.4 23.8 20.0 19.9 18.8 15.8 19.9 29.6 26.4 16.5 14.3 18.6 17.9 25.2
32.7 36.6 37.7 24.8 27.5 25.9 27.0 20.5 33.3 40.3 44.9 51.4 31.9 31.7 44.5 41.4 42.2 33.7 37.3 48.4 40.8 21.4 22.0 18.0 15.6 16.7 31.0 30.3 17.7 15.3 21.4 21.7 27.8
32.1 37.7 37.3 23.5 26.2 25.5 27.8 20.3 29.2 38.0 44.1 49.5 31.2 30.5 45.4 38.3 38.7 31.7 34.8 51.1 33.2 21.1 22.7 17.3 15.2 16.2 27.7 26.7 16.9 16.5 18.9 18.0 26.9
32.9 40.8 38.3 22.5 26.6 25.3 27.6 19.2 32.2 36.4 44.4 47.9 30.8 30.0 45.2 36.8 37.2 32.5 32.1 41.7 29.6 19.2 19.0 19.3 15.9 17.0 26.3 26.9 15.7 14.5 18.9 20.7 25.4
33.6 40.5 39.1 23.4 27.3 25.2 30.5 19.8 35.9 36.6 43.4 45.4 30.5 29.1 44.8 36.5 40.2 33.4 32.5 43.0 29.4 19.4 19.5 19.5 16.1 18.0 25.5 24.6 16.5 15.4 18.5 20.9 25.7
33.1 41.0 38.4 23.8 27.6 25.1 30.2 20.3 33.0 35.9 43.0 44.3 30.4 22.5 44.0 35.9 40.3 32.0 32.6 40.3 29.3 19.3 19.5 18.3 16.2 19.0 24.8 23.1 15.6 13.7 18.8 20.0 25.4
Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets are weighted by 2011 nominal GDP ($bn) figures. The data for India are for the fiscal years. (1) Total government expenditures; includes interest payments. (2) Consolidation of Central Government, PDVSA, Non-Financial Public Enterprises, Venezuelan Social Security Institute and Deposit and Guarantee Fund. (3) ESA95 represents consolidated fiscal accounts of the general government on an accrual basis, while the central government balance has a narrower definition and is reported on a cash basis. (4) ESA95 represents consolidated fiscal accounts of the general government on an accrual basis. (5) Consists of the state budget and the National Oil Fund. (6) Net of bank recapitalization costs. (7) Data for fiscal years starting 1 April. Selected data refer to the governments consolidated fiscal balances from 2009. (8) The definition of the consolidated government comprises the central government, extra-budgetary funds, state-owned enterprises, social security institutions and the Unemployment Insurance Fund. The data for government spending and gross debt are for the central government. (9) Refers to central government. (10) General government statistics as interpreted by the Korea government (11) Refers to the federal governments financial position. The government assumed an average oil price of $85 per barrel for 2011 in its 2011 budget. (12) General government statistics as interpreted by the Taiwan government. (13) Data for central government, based on cash basis prior to 2004, based on fiscal year ending September. Source: the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, National Statistical Offices, IHS Global Insight, Credit Suisse
198
14 March 2012
49.5 88.5 56.7 7.3 50.8 33.8 66.2 37.8 34.9 32.7 28.4 61.7 91.7 10.3 47.1 14.1 40.2 32.8 51.1 21.0 9.2 40.5 29.8 1.8 80.9 47.0 29.8 43.8 68.5 50.6 47.3 39.6
47.8 81.6 56.4 5.3 47.5 33.6 61.0 33.0 25.6 28.5 28.3 65.9 82.8 11.9 47.7 9.2 27.4 30.1 45.6 16.0 10.1 40.6 31.6 1.5 78.5 39.5 33.8 42.2 66.4 47.9 42.0 38.3
47.2 71.1 58.0 4.1 43.8 33.7 53.7 29.8 26.3 25.1 27.9 67.0 76.2 7.7 45.0 7.4 18.5 27.6 39.6 13.2 9.7 41.6 35.3 1.2 75.4 34.2 36.3 41.5 53.9 43.4 38.3 37.9
46.4 57.4 57.4 5.2 42.6 38.9 45.4 24.1 18.8 25.0 28.7 72.9 75.3 8.8 47.1 6.1 13.3 27.2 40.0 15.5 15.1 39.7 32.5 1.0 74.7 29.5 36.2 41.4 54.7 46.2 37.3 36.6
49.2 61.7 60.9 6.2 44.8 39.7 45.4 27.2 24.8 29.3 34.4 79.7 77.8 13.7 50.9 7.7 16.1 33.0 46.3 31.6 22.2 45.1 40.5 0.7 74.2 31.3 39.4 53.3 54.8 49.8 45.2 41.4
45.1 51.2 53.4 9.2 45.8 38.5 43.7 23.4 35.1 29.2 37.6 81.3 74.5 15.7 54.9 8.1 10.2 36.0 42.9 41.1 20.5 45.9 44.8 0.6 67.3 26.4 37.8 55.3 52.3 49.1 42.6 41.3
45.2 44.4 54.3 11.0 44.5 39.6 41.8 21.7 36.2 28.7 40.9 76.4 73.3 18.1 57.4 8.5 6.7 39.4 39.9 37.7 16.8 42.8 42.1 1.1 65.0 24.0 35.6 55.8 0.5 52.1 42.3 39.3
43.6 42.8 52.0 11.3 44.0 39.2 38.8 20.0 32.4 28.5 43.0 76.3 71.3 19.6 59.4 8.6 6.9 40.8 36.4 38.5 16.2 42.5 41.1 1.3 63.5 21.0 32.7 56.0 49.0 53.0 43.1 38.9
42.8 40.7 51.0 11.8 43.8 38.1 37.2 18.2 36.0 28.5 43.9 76.5 69.5 12.7 60.2 10.3 6.2 41.9 34.1 40.5 15.4 41.1 39.5 1.3 62.0 20.0 29.4 55.6 48.0 55.7 41.6 38.0
Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets are weighted by 2011 nominal GDP ($bn) figures. The data for India are for the fiscal years. (1) Debt data assumes that Paris Club debt is rescheduled in 2012. (2) Figures related to the Central Bank's new methodology. (3) Excludes debt of the central bank (4) Includes all contingent liabilities associated with IPAB, Pidiregas, FARAC, financial intermediation and other debtor support programs. (5) Central government, regional governments, PDVSA; does not include liabilities of other public institutions such as the Central bank, National Development Bank, Foreign Trade Bank, Industrial Bank of Venezuela and Andean Region Development Bank. (6) ESA95 represents consolidated fiscal accounts of the general government on an accrual basis. (7) ESA95 represents consolidated fiscal accounts of the general government on an accrual basis, while the central government balance has a narrower definition and is reported on a cash basis. (8) Data for fiscal years starting 1 April. Selected data refer to the governments consolidated fiscal balances from 2009. (9) Include Treasury bond, foreign state debt owed by the State Council, and local government bonds. (10) Also includes debt issued under the Government Bond Program. Excludes debt guaranteed by the government. (11) Refers to central government. (12) General government statistics as interpreted by the Korea government (13) Refers to the federal governments financial position. The government assumed an average oil price of $85 per barrel for 2011 in its 2011 budget. (14) General government statistics as interpreted by the Taiwan government. (15) Data for central government, based on cash basis prior to 2004, based on fiscal year ending September. (16) Includes central government, nonfinancial SOEs and financial institution development fund. Source: the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, National Statistical Offices, IHS Global Insight, Credit Suisse
199
14 March 2012
26.3 70.2 21.3 39.1 26.3 15.1 49.0 36.1 31.1 35.0 37.4 79.3 58.4 77.1 43.5 33.7 9.4 19.7 35.1 48.4 21.2 18.6 12.2 25.2 16.7 45.9 19.1 37.9 52.5 23.7 34.7 23.9
22.1 58.5 18.3 33.7 21.0 12.5 45.4 31.3 22.8 37.7 37.4 92.8 60.1 90.4 46.0 31.6 11.4 22.7 39.2 51.2 37.3 17.9 11.6 28.5 18.2 35.2 23.7 33.4 43.6 22.8 33.8 23.7
21.2 53.5 17.6 33.9 21.5 12.3 42.5 30.7 22.2 41.3 38.9 102.0 54.4 92.3 48.3 35.7 18.9 26.4 38.5 57.5 50.8 18.1 11.1 41.3 18.1 31.7 31.8 30.4 36.6 24.0 28.1 24.7
19.4 46.1 15.9 37.4 19.0 11.8 36.9 27.5 20.8 39.1 43.1 122.4 43.8 82.5 54.6 28.9 16.7 26.6 38.1 57.5 45.7 16.3 8.6 23.3 18.7 29.4 34.2 30.6 31.4 22.6 27.6 22.8
22.6 47.6 17.0 45.2 22.8 18.7 42.0 28.1 24.4 46.9 43.0 140.7 47.9 100.5 58.0 38.2 22.8 27.6 43.7 90.9 55.9 17.2 8.4 19.2 18.9 31.9 41.6 35.2 32.7 21.7 28.5 25.7
22.1 38.1 16.3 42.6 22.5 19.0 39.3 26.2 39.3 43.8 47.2 137.7 48.7 81.7 63.6 32.9 19.9 27.2 39.4 87.3 50.4 16.8 9.4 24.7 17.7 28.3 35.6 31.1 30.0 23.6 30.4 24.6
20.9 32.7 16.3 42.2 20.6 17.9 35.6 24.4 34.1 40.2 47.1 120.9 41.9 71.1 63.4 29.1 15.9 27.9 40.2 71.3 41.3 16.9 10.2 22.6 18.8 24.9 35.1 29.1 27.8 20.5 31.3 23.6
20.5 30.1 17.4 42.4 18.5 17.4 32.2 22.7 27.5 39.5 58.0 121.5 42.6 62.5 65.1 25.9 15.1 28.8 40.6 70.6 39.5 15.7 9.3 21.1 17.5 23.8 32.3 25.9 26.5 20.5 29.3 22.6
20.0 27.4 17.4 43.1 16.8 15.9 30.3 21.1 30.9 38.3 58.5 112.8 41.7 59.7 63.4 24.4 14.4 28.2 40.2 74.7 38.4 14.3 8.5 19.6 16.0 22.6 28.4 23.6 24.5 20.0 26.2 21.4
Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets are weighted by 2011 nominal GDP ($bn) figures. The data for India are for the fiscal years.
200
14 March 2012
(1) Expressed in strong bolivares for all years, though the change took place in January 2008. (2) The basket comprises $0.55 and 0.45. Our forecasts for the USDRUB exchange rate are derived from our basket exchange rate forecasts and Credit Suisse's EURUSD forecasts. (3) The basket exchange rate is the average of USDTRY and EURTRY exchange rates. Our forecasts for USDTRY are derived from our basket exchange rate forecasts and Credit Suisse's EURUSD forecasts. Source: the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, National Statistical Offices, IHS Global Insight, Credit Suisse
201
14 March 2012
2006 10.09 8.30 13.25 5.25 7.50 7.00 4.14 4.50 10.20 6.70 2.75 8.00 5.00 9.00 4.00 2.25 5.02 9.00 18.38 9.00 5.21 4.05 2.81 3.90 6.00 9.75 4.50 3.50 7.50 3.44 1.69 5.00
2007 9.65 10.30 11.25 6.00 9.50 7.50 4.18 5.00 10.89 6.84 3.50 7.50 4.00 11.00 5.00 2.75 4.79 11.00 16.73 8.00 5.14 4.76 4.43 3.45 6.00 8.00 5.00 3.50 5.45 2.38 2.08 3.25
2008 11.75 13.00 13.75 8.25 9.50 8.25 2.88 6.50 17.60 7.70 2.25 10.00 2.50 10.50 5.00 6.75 2.89 11.50 15.64 12.00 2.82 2.75 1.90 0.95 3.50 9.25 3.00 2.50 5.86 0.96 0.87 2.75
2009 7.29 11.50 8.75 0.50 3.50 4.50 2.54 1.25 15.00 4.22 1.00 6.00 1.00 7.00 3.50 3.50 1.33 7.00 7.11 10.25 2.40 2.30 1.83 0.13 3.50 6.50 2.00 2.00 4.00 0.70 0.11 1.25
2010 8.39 11.50 10.75 3.25 3.00 4.50 2.05 3.00 15.00 3.65 0.75 5.75 2.00 7.00 3.50 2.75 0.74 5.50 6.50 7.75 2.22 4.23 4.62 0.30 5.75 6.50 2.50 2.75 4.00 0.44 0.25 2.00
2011E 8.73 11.50 11.00 5.25 4.75 4.50 1.40 4.25 14.50 4.08 0.75 7.00 2.75 7.50 4.50 4.00 0.69 5.50 5.75 7.75 1.72 5.00 5.47 0.30 7.25 6.00 3.25 3.00 4.25 0.38 0.40 3.25
2012F 7.39 11.50 8.50 5.00 5.50 3.75 1.50 3.75 14.50 4.02 1.00 6.00 2.25 7.00 4.50 4.00 0.82 5.50 5.75 7.50 1.56 4.75 5.42 0.30 5.75 6.25 3.25 3.00 4.00 0.38 0.40 2.75
2013F 7.60 11.50 8.50 5.00 5.50 4.50 2.00 3.75 15.00 4.26 1.50 5.00 3.00 7.00 5.00 4.25 0.81 6.50 5.75 7.50 1.53 4.92 5.67 0.30 5.75 6.50 3.25 3.00 4.25 0.38 0.40 3.25
Interest rate (end-year, %) 12.35 6.00 18.00 4.50 6.00 8.25 2.73 3.25 11.74 5.19 2.00 6.00 4.50 8.00 4.50 0.50 3.75 7.00 15.35 9.50 3.58 4.49 3.60 4.23 5.50 12.75 3.75 3.00 7.50 3.25 1.47 4.00
(5)
Poland One-week reference rate Russia - Overnight deposit rate Saudi Arabia - Three-month deposit rate South Africa - Repo rate Turkey - One-week repo rate (2) Ukraine - Discount rate United Arab Emirates - Three-month deposit rate EMERGING ASIA China - 3-month interbank rate Hong Kong - 3-month HIBOR India - Reverse repo rate (3) Indonesia - Overnight rate (4) Korea - Overnight base rate (%, end year) Malaysia - Overnight policy rate Singapore - 3-month SIBOR Taiwan - Overnight rate Thailand - Overnight repo rate (6) Philippines - Overnight borrowing rate
Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets are weighted by 2011 nominal GDP ($bn) figures. The data for India are for the fiscal years.(1) The central bank 1-month deposit rate equals half of the refinancing rate and until the banking crisis in the summer of 2007 represented a more effective policy instrument. (2) The monetary policy committee changed the definition of the policy rate on 18 May 2010 to the one-week repo rate from central banks overnight borrowing rate previously. (3) The RBI uses a mix of instruments, such as the repo rate, reverse repo rate, CRR (cash reserve ratio), etc. (4) BI changed its policy target from 1m SBI rate to overnight rate in 2008. (5) BNM changed the policy rate from the intervention rate to the overnight rate in May 2004. (6) Through 2006, the policy rate was the 14-day repo rate. Source: the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, National Statistical Offices, IHS Global Insight, Credit Suisse
202
14 March 2012
Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets are weighted by 2011 nominal GDP ($bn) figures. The data for India are for the fiscal years. Source: IMF International Financial Statistics, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, National Statistical Offices, IHS Global Insight, Credit Suisse
203
14 March 2012
Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets are weighted by 2011 nominal GDP ($bn) figures. The data for India are for the fiscal years. (1) Includes bank lending to individuals and private corporate debt (debentures and bank loans to the sector). Source: IMF International Financial Statistics, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, National Statistical Offices, IHS Global Insight, Credit Suisse
204
14 March 2012
Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets are weighted by 2011 nominal GDP ($bn) figures. The data for India are for the fiscal years. Source: the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, National Statistical Offices, IHS Global Insight, Credit Suisse
205
14 March 2012
Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets represent the sums of individual country data. The data for India are for the fiscal years. (1) Net foreign assets of the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority. (2) Central bank forex reserves minus monetary authorities other liabilities. (3) Not including forward FX purchases. Source: the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, National Statistical Offices, Credit Suisse
206
14 March 2012
Aggregates for regions and total emerging markets are weighted by 2011 nominal GDP ($bn) figures. The data for India are for the fiscal years. Source: the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, National Statistical Offices, Credit Suisse
207
STRATEGY
Igor Arsenin Head of Latin America Strategy +1 212 325 6437 igor.arsenin@credit-suisse.com Daniel Chodos Latin America Strategy +1 212 325 7708 daniel.chodos@credit-suisse.com Ray Farris Chief Asia Strategist +65 6212 3412 ray.farris@credit-suisse.com Saad Siddiqui EEMEA Strategy +44 20 7888 9464 saad.siddiqui@credit-suisse.com Nimrod Mevorach EEMEA Strategy +44 20 7888 1257 nimrod.mevorach@credit-suisse.com Daniel Katzive FX Strategy +1 212 538 2163 daniel.katzive@credit-suisse.com Ashish Agrawal Asia Strategy +65 6212 3405 ashish.agrawal@credit-suisse.com Chris Balster, CFA Locus Analytics Specialist +1 212 538 5889 chris.balster@credit-suisse.com
..
Disclosure Appendix
Analyst Certification The analysts identified in this report each certify, with respect to the companies or securities that the individual analyzes, that (1) the views expressed in this report accurately reflect his or her personal views about all of the subject companies and securities and (2) no part of his or her compensation was, is or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this report. Important Disclosures Credit Suisse's policy is only to publish investment research that is impartial, independent, clear, fair and not misleading. For more detail, please refer to Credit Suisse's Policies for Managing Conflicts of Interest in connection with Investment Research: http://www.csfb.com/research-andanalytics/disclaimer/managing_conflicts_disclaimer.html Credit Suisses policy is to publish research reports as it deems appropriate, based on developments with the subject issuer, the sector or the market that may have a material impact on the research views or opinions stated herein. The analyst(s) involved in the preparation of this research report received compensation that is based upon various factors, including Credit Suisse's total revenues, a portion of which are generated by Credit Suisse's Investment Banking and Fixed Income Divisions. Credit Suisse may trade as principal in the securities or derivatives of the issuers that are the subject of this report. At any point in time, Credit Suisse is likely to have significant holdings in the securities mentioned in this report. As at the date of this report, Credit Suisse acts as a market maker or liquidity provider in the debt securities of the subject issuer(s) mentioned in this report. For important disclosure information on securities recommended in this report, please visit the website at https://firesearchdisclosure.credit-suisse.com or call +1-212-538-7625. For the history of any relative value trade ideas suggested by the Fixed Income research department as well as fundamental recommendations provided by the Emerging Markets Sovereign Strategy Group over the previous 12 months, please view the document at http://research-andanalytics.csfb.com/docpopup.asp?ctbdocid=330703_1_en. Credit Suisse clients with access to the Locus website may refer to http://www.creditsuisse.com/locus. For the history of recommendations provided by Technical Analysis, please visit the website at http://www.credit-suisse.com/techanalysis. Credit Suisse does not provide any tax advice. Any statement herein regarding any US federal tax is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purposes of avoiding any penalties. Emerging Markets Bond Recommendation Definitions Buy: Indicates a recommended buy on our expectation that the issue will deliver a return higher than the risk-free rate. Sell: Indicates a recommended sell on our expectation that the issue will deliver a return lower than the risk-free rate. Corporate Bond Fundamental Recommendation Definitions Buy: Indicates a recommended buy on our expectation that the issue will be a top performer in its sector. Outperform: Indicates an above-average total return performer within its sector. Bonds in this category have stable or improving credit profiles and are undervalued, or they may be weaker credits that, we believe, are cheap relative to the sector and are expected to outperform on a total-return basis. These bonds may possess price risk in a volatile environment. Market Perform: Indicates a bond that is expected to return average performance in its sector. Underperform: Indicates a below-average total-return performer within its sector. Bonds in this category have weak or worsening credit trends, or they may be stable credits that, we believe, are overvalued or rich relative to the sector. Sell: Indicates a recommended sell on the expectation that the issue will be among the poor performers in its sector. Restricted: In certain circumstances, Credit Suisse policy and/or applicable law and regulations preclude certain types of communications, including an investment recommendation, during the course of Credit Suisse's engagement in an investment banking transaction and in certain other circumstances. Not Rated: Credit Suisse Global Credit Research or Global Leveraged Finance Research covers the issuer but currently does not offer an investment view on the subject issue. Not Covered: Neither Credit Suisse Global Credit Research nor Global Leveraged Finance Research covers the issuer or offers an investment view on the issuer or any securities related to it. Any communication from Research on securities or companies that Credit Suisse does not cover is factual or a reasonable, non-material deduction based on an analysis of publicly available information. Corporate Bond Risk Category Definitions In addition to the recommendation, each issue may have a risk category indicating that it is an appropriate holding for an "average" high yield investor, designated as Market, or that it has a higher or lower risk profile, designated as Speculative and Conservative, respectively. Credit Suisse Credit Rating Definitions Credit Suisse may assign rating opinions to investment-grade and crossover issuers. Ratings are based on our assessment of a company's creditworthiness and are not recommendations to buy or sell a security. The ratings scale (AAA, AA, A, BBB, BB, B) is dependent on our assessment of an issuer's ability to meet its financial commitments in a timely manner. Within each category, creditworthiness is further detailed with a scale of High, Mid, or Low with High being the strongest sub-category rating: High AAA, Mid AAA, Low AAA obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments is extremely strong; High AA, Mid AA, Low AA obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments is very strong; High A, Mid A, Low A obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments is strong; High BBB, Mid BBB, Low BBB obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments is adequate, but adverse economic/operating/financial circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity to meet its obligations; High BB, Mid BB, Low BB obligations have speculative characteristics and are subject to substantial credit risk; High B, Mid B, Low B obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments is very weak and highly vulnerable to adverse economic, operating, and financial circumstances; High CCC, Mid CCC, Low CCC obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments is extremely weak and is dependent on favorable economic, operating, and financial circumstances. Credit Suisse's rating opinions do not necessarily correlate with those of the rating agencies.
References in this report to Credit Suisse include all of the subsidiaries and affiliates of Credit Suisse AG operating under its investment banking division. For more information on our structure, please use the following link: https://www.credit-suisse.com/who_we_are/en/. This report is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would subject Credit Suisse AG or its affiliates (CS) to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. All material presented in this report, unless specifically indicated otherwise, is under copyright to CS. None of the material, nor its content, nor any copy of it, may be altered in any way, transmitted to, copied or distributed to any other party, without the prior express written permission of CS. All trademarks, service marks and logos used in this report are trademarks or service marks or registered trademarks or service marks of CS or its affiliates. The information, tools and material presented in this report are provided to you for information purposes only and are not to be used or considered as an offer or the solicitation of an offer to sell or to buy or subscribe for securities or other financial instruments. CS may not have taken any steps to ensure that the securities referred to in this report are suitable for any particular investor. CS will not treat recipients of this report as its customers by virtue of their receiving this report. The investments and services contained or referred to in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about such investments or investment services. Nothing in this report constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a representation that any investment or strategy is suitable or appropriate to your individual circumstances, or otherwise constitutes a personal recommendation to you. CS does not advise on the tax consequences of investments and you are advised to contact an independent tax adviser. Please note in particular that the bases and levels of taxation may change. Information and opinions presented in this report have been obtained or derived from sources believed by CS to be reliable, but CS makes no representation as to their accuracy or completeness. CS accepts no liability for loss arising from the use of the material presented in this report, except that this exclusion of liability does not apply to the extent that such liability arises under specific statutes or regulations applicable to CS. This report is not to be relied upon in substitution for the exercise of independent judgment. CS may have issued, and may in the future issue, other reports that are inconsistent with, and reach different conclusions from, the information presented in this report. Those reports reflect the different assumptions, views and analytical methods of the analysts who prepared them and CS is under no obligation to ensure that such other reports are brought to the attention of any recipient of this report. CS may, to the extent permitted by law, participate or invest in financing transactions with the issuer(s) of the securities referred to in this report, perform services for or solicit business from such issuers, and/or have a position or holding, or other material interest, or effect transactions, in such securities or options thereon, or other investments related thereto. In addition, it may make markets in the securities mentioned in the material presented in this report. CS may have, within the last three years, served as manager or co-manager of a public offering of securities for, or currently may make a primary market in issues of, any or all of the entities mentioned in this report or may be providing, or have provided within the previous 12 months, significant advice or investment services in relation to the investment concerned or a related investment. Additional information is, subject to duties of confidentiality, available on request. Some investments referred to in this report will be offered solely by a single entity and in the case of some investments solely by CS, or an associate of CS or CS may be the only market maker in such investments. Past performance should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future performance, and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made regarding future performance. Information, opinions and estimates contained in this report reflect a judgement at its original date of publication by CS and are subject to change without notice. The price, value of and income from any of the securities or financial instruments mentioned in this report can fall as well as rise. The value of securities and financial instruments is subject to exchange rate fluctuation that may have a positive or adverse effect on the price or income of such securities or financial instruments. Investors in securities such as ADRs, the values of which are influenced by currency volatility, effectively assume this risk. Structured securities are complex instruments, typically involve a high degree of risk and are intended for sale only to sophisticated investors who are capable of understanding and assuming the risks involved. The market value of any structured security may be affected by changes in economic, financial and political factors (including, but not limited to, spot and forward interest and exchange rates), time to maturity, market conditions and volatility, and the credit quality of any issuer or reference issuer. Any investor interested in purchasing a structured product should conduct their own investigation and analysis of the product and consult with their own professional advisers as to the risks involved in making such a purchase. Some investments discussed in this report may have a high level of volatility. High volatility investments may experience sudden and large falls in their value causing losses when that investment is realised. Those losses may equal your original investment. Indeed, in the case of some investments the potential losses may exceed the amount of initial investment and, in such circumstances, you may be required to pay more money to support those losses. Income yields from investments may fluctuate and, in consequence, initial capital paid to make the investment may be used as part of that income yield. Some investments may not be readily realisable and it may be difficult to sell or realise those investments, similarly it may prove difficult for you to obtain reliable information about the value, or risks, to which such an investment is exposed. This report may provide the addresses of, or contain hyperlinks to, websites. Except to the extent to which the report refers to website material of CS, CS has not reviewed any such site and takes no responsibility for the content contained therein. Such address or hyperlink (including addresses or hyperlinks to CSs own website material) is provided solely for your convenience and information and the content of any such website does not in any way form part of this document. Accessing such website or following such link through this report or CSs website shall be at your own risk. This report is issued and distributed in Europe (except Switzerland) by Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited, One Cabot Square, London E14 4QJ, England, which is regulated in the United Kingdom by The Financial Services Authority (FSA). This report is being distributed in Germany by Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited Niederlassung Frankfurt am Main regulated by the Bundesanstalt fuer Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht ("BaFin"). This report is being distributed in the United States and Canada by Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC; in Switzerland by Credit Suisse AG; in Brazil by Banco de Investimentos Credit Suisse (Brasil) S.A; in Mexico by Banco Credit Suisse (Mxico), S.A. (transactions related to the securities mentioned in this report will only be effected in compliance with applicable regulation); in Japan by Credit Suisse Securities (Japan) Limited, Financial Instruments Firm, Director-General of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Kinsho) No. 66, a member of Japan Securities Dealers Association, The Financial Futures Association of Japan, Japan Securities Investment Advisers Association, Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association; elsewhere in Asia/ Pacific by whichever of the following is the appropriately authorised entity in the relevant jurisdiction: Credit Suisse (Hong Kong) Limited, Credit Suisse Equities (Australia) Limited, Credit Suisse Securities (Thailand) Limited, Credit Suisse Securities (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch, and elsewhere in the world by the relevant authorised affiliate of the above. Research on Taiwanese securities produced by Credit Suisse AG, Taipei Branch has been prepared by a registered Senior Business Person. Research provided to residents of Malaysia is authorised by the Head of Research for Credit Suisse Securities (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, to whom they should direct any queries on +603 2723 2020. This research may not conform to Canadian disclosure requirements. In jurisdictions where CS is not already registered or licensed to trade in securities, transactions will only be effected in accordance with applicable securities legislation, which will vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and may require that the trade be made in accordance with applicable exemptions from registration or licensing requirements. Non-U.S. customers wishing to effect a transaction should contact a CS entity in their local jurisdiction unless governing law permits otherwise. U.S. customers wishing to effect a transaction should do so only by contacting a representative at Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC in the U.S. This material is not for distribution to retail clients and is directed exclusively at Credit Suisse's market professional and institutional clients. Recipients who are not market professional or institutional investor clients of CS should seek the advice of their independent financial advisor prior to taking any investment decision based on this report or for any necessary explanation of its contents. This research may relate to investments or services of a person outside of the UK or to other matters which are not regulated by the FSA or in respect of which the protections of the FSA for private customers and/or the UK compensation scheme may not be available, and further details as to where this may be the case are available upon request in respect of this report. CS may provide various services to US municipal entities or obligated persons ("municipalities"), including suggesting individual transactions or trades and entering into such transactions. Any services CS provides to municipalities are not viewed as advice within the meaning of Section 975 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. CS is providing any such services and related information solely on an arms length basis and not as an advisor or fiduciary to the municipality. In connection with the provision of the any such services, there is no agreement, direct or indirect, between any municipality (including the officials, management, employees or agents thereof) and CS for CS to provide advice to the municipality. Municipalities should consult with their financial, accounting and legal advisors regarding any such services provided by CS. In addition, CS is not acting for direct or indirect compensation to solicit the municipality on behalf of an unaffiliated broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, or investment adviser for the purpose of obtaining or retaining an engagement by the municipality for or in connection with Municipal Financial Products, the issuance of municipal securities, or of an investment adviser to provide investment advisory services to or on behalf of the municipality. Copyright 2012 CREDIT SUISSE GROUP AG and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Investment principal on bonds can be eroded depending on sale price or market price. In addition, there are bonds on which investment principal can be eroded due to changes in redemption amounts. Care is required when investing in such instruments.
When you purchase non-listed Japanese fixed income securities (Japanese government bonds, Japanese municipal bonds, Japanese government guaranteed bonds, Japanese corporate bonds) from CS as a seller, you will be requested to pay purchase price only.