Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Teaching Project
Fall 2001
2NH3 + CO2 NH2COONH4 NH2CONH2 + H2O Where NH3: Ammonia (it is substantially noncorrosive) NH2COONH4: Ammonium Carbamate (extremely corrosive) NH2CONH2: Urea (it is substantially noncorrosive)
eq 1
The idea of this job is to find an explanation of the corrosion process that attack reactors during the production of urea. There are multiple failures reported, some catastrophically that yields to explore more in detail of this process. (Wang 2009) The present study makes an estimation of the kinetics parameters of the production of urea; the objective is to find an explanation why this reaction is so aggressive in terms of corrosion to the materials to the construction material of the reactor (titanium, stainless steel) The production of ammonia into urea can be used to produced fertilizer or just as a carbon collector in the flue gas (Conway 2011).
Teaching Project
Fall 2001
The Corrosion process in any metal needs the following to occur: 1. 2. 3. 4. Anode Cathode Electronic path Ionic path or electrolyte
The Pourbaix diagrams are an excellent tool to exemplify the behavior of the metals in aqueous solutions (Uhlig 2011), Figure 1 shows the Fe Pourbaix diagram at 298 K (25 C), the disadvantages of this tools is that can only be constructed from pure materials, but ii is a good approximation.
The following figures show the way we should read these diagrams and help us to understand the chemical stability of the metal in a certain environment.
Teaching Project
Fall 2001
Teaching Project
Fall 2001
(1) (2)
There are not enough information of the kinetics of urea formation from ammonia and carbon dioxide reaction, but this give me the freedom to play with this kinetics and estimate how these reactions goes forward inside the reactor. Writing the reaction in a simplify way we can get the following:
A+BC C+AD
Assuming that these reactions are first order and there are no any change in T and P, we can get the following result. We can see in the graph that the carbamic acid (NH2COOH) has a really slow conversion into urea, giving it the opportunity to interact with the metal surface and starting the corrosion process. The corrosion process could be explained as follows (Han 1998): NH2COOH NH2COO- + H+ Me + xNH2COO- Mez+( NH2COO-)x + ZeMez+( NH2COO-)x Mez+ + xNH2COO(3) (4) (5)
The corrosion process can be illustrated in Figure 5, the metal starts from point 1 in the passive behavior and after the urea production starts, the pH inside the reactor changes to more acidic values making the material more susceptible to the corrosion attack point 2. Carbamic acid reaction to form Urea is really slow, compare to the first reaction that forms the carbamic acid. This explains all the time that carbamic acid has to attack the surface of the material and start the corrosion process. As urea production continues the corrosion grows until a failure is present and brakes the material.
Teaching Project
Fall 2001
1000
2000
3000 t
4000
5000
6000
C NH2COOH, k1=1e-4,k2=1e-5
C urea, k1=1e-4,k2=1e-5
Teaching Project
Fall 2001
Teaching Project
Fall 2001
Localized corrosion process, the conjoint of a tensile stress and a corrodent will in some instances result in the cracking of a metal alloy. Stresses that cause cracking arise from residual cold work, welding, thermal treatment or may be externally applied during service. (Carpenter 1971)
To finish this work I want to point that the corrosion process in these urea reactors are not well understood, but we can prevent the corrosion problems with the proper materials selection, for these case, stainless steel and titanium, but buy these material with and certified provider in order to avoid any mechanical problem in the material, and to have an adequate maintenance program to avoid any catastrophic consequence like the explosion on the reactor.
Teaching Project
Fall 2001
Polymath program
Calculated values of DEQ variables Variable Initial value Minimal value Maximal value Final value 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 CA CB CC CD K k1 k2 r1A r1B 500. 200. 0 0 5. 0.0001 1.0E-05 -10. -10. 10. 0 0 0 -10. -10. 10. 0 0 100.4004 3.639E-47 0 0 5. 0.0001 1.0E-05 -10. -10. 3.653E-49 -0.2757209 -0.2757209 0 -10. -10. -0.2629426 0 0 500. 200. 123.0523 199.5996 5. 0.0001 1.0E-05 -3.653E-49 -3.653E-49 10. 0 0 0.2757209 -2.835E-06 -3.653E-49 10. 0.2757209 10000. 100.4004 3.639E-47 0.4004307 199.5996 5. 0.0001 1.0E-05 -3.653E-49 -3.653E-49 3.653E-49 -2.835E-06 -2.835E-06 2.835E-06 -2.835E-06 -3.653E-49 -2.835E-06 2.835E-06 10000.
Differential equations 1 d(CA)/d(t) = rA 2 d(CB)/d(t) = rB 3 d(CC)/d(t) = rC 4 d(CD)/d(t) = rD Explicit equations 1 2 3 4 5 6 k2 = 0.00001 k1 = 0.0001 K=5 r2A = -k2*(CA*CC-(CD/K)) r1A = -k1*CA*CB r1B = r1A
Teaching Project
Fall 2001
References 1. Carpenter. Corrosion Causes and Control. NY: McGraw-Hill, 1971. 2. Conway, William. "Kinetics of the Reversible Reaction of CO2(aq) with Ammonia in Aqueous Solution." The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 2011: 6405-6412. 3. Corrosion-Akron. n.d. 4. Fontana, Mars G. Corrosion Engineering. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1986. 5. Han, Wenan. "Approach to the Cause of Corrosion in Urea Medium." J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 1998: 92-94. 6. Krystow, P. E. "Materials and Corrosion Problems in Urea Plants." Chemical Engineering Progress 67 (1971): 59-64. 7. Uhlig, Herbert. Corrosion Handbook, 3rd edition. The Electrochemical Society, 2011. 8. Wang, Weiqiang. "The explosion reason analysis of urea reactor of Pingyin." Engineering Failure Analysis, 2009: 972986. 9. Wikipedia. Wikipedia. 11 19, 2011. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urea#cite_note-Ullmann-14 (accessed 11 19, 2011).