Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Chapter 5
h as wood, laminated composites, and single crystal metals are stiffer when loaded along some material directions than others. Such mate opic, and cannot be modeled using the procedures described in the preceding sections. In this chapter, we describe briefly the most widely g elastic deformation and stress in two dimensional anisotropic solids. As you might expect, these calculations are difficult, and while the in a surprisingly compact form, the resulting expressions can usually only be evaluated using a computer. In many practical situations it utions for anisotropic materials using direct numerical computations (e.g. using the finite element method, discussed in Chapters 7 and 8). utions are useful: for example, the finite element method cannot easily be applied to problems involving cracks, dislocations, or point fo singularities; in addition exact calculations can show how the solutions vary parametrically with elastic constants and material orientation.
ne elasticity problem is illustrated in the picture. The solid is two dimensional: in this case we are concerned direction, and every cross section is loaded plane. The material is an anisotropic, linear elastic solid, whose (or an equivalent matrix) as discussed in Chapter 3.
rain solutions, which means that the solid is very long in the
nd only in the
calculations, we shall assume that (i) The solid is free of body forces; (ii) thermal strains can be neglected. conditions the general equations of elasticity listed in Section 5.1.2 reduce to
usual boundary conditions. In subsequent discussions, it will be convenient to write the equilibrium equations in matrix form as
necessary for strict plane strain deformation of anisotropic solids. For Plane strain deformations the displacement field h
can be chosen to satisfy two, but not all three, of the three equations. The elastic constants must satisfy
eformations therefore only exist in a material with elastic constants and orientation satisfying
cubic materials
plane strain deformations. A generalized plane strain displacement field can exist in any general anisotropic crystal. In this case the form
cement is independent of position along the length of the cylindrical solid, but points may move out of their original plane when the solid is
ution is a compact, complex variable, representation for generalized plane strain solutions to elastically anisotropic solids. To write the solu e several new quantities:
which satisfy
e Q, R and T are 3x3 matrices, this is a sextic equation for p, with 6 roots. It is possible to show that for a material with physically adm
ants p is always complex, so the 6 roots are pairs of complex conjugates , We define
to be the c
defined as
and
into matrices
are uniquely defined for a particular set of elastic constants, the eigenvectors
equently the vectors ) are not unique, since they may be multiplied by any arbitrary complex number and will remain eigen ul to normalize the eigenvectors so that the matrices A and B satisfy
are the three pairs of complex roots of the characteristic equation; and
or isotropic solids.
resentation of stresses: The stresses can be expressed in terms of a vector valued stress function ined as
as
matrix representation for displacement and stresses: The solution for the displacement field and stress function can be expressed in the fo
resentation for stresses and displacements: The solutions given above are the most general form of the generalized plane strain so uations of linear elasticity. However, not all the solutions of this form are of practical interest, since the displacements and stresses must be ost solutions can be expressed in a much simpler the form as
that
, where
can be re-written as
matrix form as
e are the matrices defined in Section 5.5.2. The eigenvalue/eigenvector pairs (p, h shows that the governing equation is indeed satisfied.
ective is to show that stresses can be computed from the formulas given in Section 5.5.2. To see this,
all that for each of the six characteristic solutions we may obtain displacements as , so that
mbining the results of (2) and (3) shows that stresses can be computed from
has components
, and
envalues p for a general anisotropic material involve the solution to a sextic equation, an explicit general solution cannot be found. Eve hich have a single symmetry plane) give solutions that are so cumbersome that many symbolic manipulation programs cannot handle them.
erials is manageable, as long as one of the coordinate axes is parallel to the matrix reduces to
rate Materials
me materials for which the general procedure outlined in the preceding sections breaks down. We can illustrate this by attempting to a
eigenvalue . In addition, if you attempt to substitute material constants representing an isotropic material into the formulas for A an section you will find that the terms in the matrices are infinite.
significance of this degeneracy is not known. Although isotropic materials are degenerate, isotropy does not appear to be a necessary as fully anisotropic materials may exhibit the same degeneracy for appropriate values of their stiffnesses.
. Shin and Y. Y. Earmme, Int J. Solids Structures 40, (6) 1411-1431 (2003) have found a way to re-write the complex variable formulation o a form that is identical in structure to the Stroh formulation. This approach is very useful, because it enables us to solve problems involvi opic and anisotropic materials, but it does not provide any fundamental insight into the cause of degeneracy, nor does it provide a gener
ctical situations the problems associated with degeneracy can be avoided by re-writing the solution in terms of special tensors (to be de computed directly from the elastic constants, without needing to determine A and B.
and corresponding eigenvector matrix known as the fundamental elasticity matrix, defined as
trices or of N.
can be sho
sed as
sitive definite and symmetric its inverse can always be computed. Therefore we may write
envalue equation, and multiplying out the matrices gives the required result.
nerate materials N has six distinct eigenvectors. A matrix of this kind is called simple. For some materials N has repeated eigenvalues, but vectors. A matrix of this kind is called semi-simple. For degenerate materials N does not have six distinct eigenvectors. A matrix of this k ple.
ion that and are right and left eigenvectors of N has an important con es are distinct (i.e. the material is not degenerate), the left and right eigenvectors of a matrix are orthogonal. This implies that
wo matrices are inverses of each other, and therefore we also have that
n we define four important tensors that can be calculated from the Stroh matrices A and B. Specifically, we introduce:
Barnett-Lothe tensors
g relations between the Barnett-Lothe tensors and the impedance tensor are also useful
ns can be expressed in terms of S, H and L directly, rather than in terms of A and B. In addition, Barnett and Lothe devised a procedure f ithout needing to calculate A and B (See Sect. 5.5.11). Consequently, these tensors can be calculated even for degenerate materials.
le, for cubic materials, with coordinate axes aligned with coordinate directions,
elow various useful algebraic relations between the various matrices that were introduced in the preceding sections.
, a matrix
satisfying
is skew
is skew Hermitian. To see this, note that the orthogonality relations for A and B require that
is Hermitian. This follows trivially from the preceding expression. and are both Hermitian. To see this, note and use the preceding result.
are Hermitian. To show the first expression, note that
matrices
are both orthogonal matrices. To see this for the first matrix, note that
t.
Barnett-Lothe tensors are real (i.e. they have zero imaginary part). To see this, note that the orthogonality of A and B (see sect. 5.5.7) impli
efore
and
ee the first result, note that and use the definitio he second result follows in the same way. Note that H, L and S are all real, so this gives a decomposition of M and its inverse into real a . In addition, since we can compute the Barnett-Lothe tensors for degenerate materials, M can also be determined without needing to com citly.
. To see M and its inverse are Hermitian, note that the imaginary part of a Hermitian matrix is skew symmetric, and use the preceding res , where .
tensors and matrices defined in the preceding sections are all functions of the elastic constants for the material. Since the nts depend on the orientation of the material with respect to the coordinate axes, the matrices are functions of the direction of e system.
denote any one of the three Stroh eigenvalues and the matrices of Stroh eigenvectors, computed for the coordinate ; denote the Barnett-Lothe tensors and impedance tensor in the , , etc denote the various matrices and tensors in the
basis
larly, let s.
as follows
These results can be derived as follow: that the displacements transform as vectors, so that . Consequently,
h shows that
with
quired.
basis change formulas for Q, R and T follow directly from the definitions of these matrices.
tituting for
gives
basis change formulas for the Barnett-Lothe tensors and impedance tensor follow trivially from their definitions. The basis change formula er assertion that these quantities are tensors.
tt-Lothe integrals
ange formulas in the preceding section lead to a remarkable direct procedure for computing the Barnett-Lothe tensors, without needing to ca ficance of this result is that, while A and B break down for degenerate materials, S, H, and L are well-behaved. Consequently, if a so terms of these tensors, it can be computed for any combination of material parameters.
we shall show that S, H, and L can be computed by integrating the sub-matrices of the fundamental elasticity matrix over orientation spac
can be diagonalized as
expressed as
hat [a,b] are eigenvectors of the rotated elasticity matrix. Following standard procedure, we obtain the diagonalization stated.
mine
ves
he integral is determined by Im(p) because the branch cut for axis). Thus,
ate of stress (with generalized plane strain deformation) provides a very simple example of the Stroh representation. The solution can be and corresponding strain we may write
form
To see this, recall that a and b form eigenvectors of the fundamental elasticity matrix N as
efining
uired result.
ustrates the problem to be solved. We consider an infinite, anisotropic, linear elastic solid, whose elastic properties cterized using the Stroh matrices A and B.
or
ime, the solid is subjected to a line of force (with line direction extending out of the plane of the figure). The force per unit length acting on .
ment and stress function can be expressed in terms of the Stroh matrices as
We must show that the solution satisfies the following conditions: displacement field for a dislocation with burgers vector b must satisfy
(this corresponds to taking a counterclockwise Burgers circuit around the dislocation, as described in Section 5.3.4)
resultant force exerted by the stresses acting on any contour surrounding the point force must balance the external force F. For exam lar contour with radius r centered at the origin, we see that
can create the required solution using properties of log(z). We try a solution of the form
e , whence
we may write
an solve for q
hows an anisotropic, linear elastic half-space. The elastic properties of the solid are characterized by the Stroh matrices efined in Section 5.5.2. The solid contains a dislocation with Burgers vector b and is also subjected to a linear load with length F at a point , while the surface of the solid is traction free.
m in the expression for f will be recognized as the solution for a dislocation and point force in an infinite solid; the second term corrects this s of the free surface.
(c) A.F. Bower, 2008 This site is made freely available for educational purposes. You may extract parts of the text for non-commercial purposes provided that the source is cited. Please respect the authors copyright.