32

CHAPTER-4 Analysis of Data and Result of the Study

Data were collected with the help of the standard tools were found reliable, valid and accurate. However, for systematic presentation in this chapter, the raw data need to be organized in such a way so that they can be classified, tabulated and analyzed systematically for meeting the worthwhile purpose of the study. The present chapter is, therefore, devoted to analyze and interpret the data for reaching at a definite conclusion

Findings
Table no. 1 Comparison of Arms and Shoulder Strength among the Engineering and Pharmacy students Subjects Mean Std. Deviation Engineering Pharmacy
* Insignificant

Mean Difference 0.51

D.f

t value

8.90 8.39

1.05 0.96

38

1.78*

at 0.05 level of significance (38)(0.05)= 2.042

33

Table no.1 shows that mean scores of engineering and pharmacy students are 8.90 and 8.39 respectively, whereas standard deviation of engineering and pharmacy students are1.05and .96 respectively. Here the calculated t-value1.78is lesser than requiredt value 2.042. Hence there is no significant difference between Pharmacy and Engineering students in relation to arm and shoulder strength at 0.05 level of significance.

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Mean Std. Deviation Engineering Pharmacy

Fig. no. 1 Mean and standard deviation value of medicine ball throw.

34

Table no. 2 Comparison of Muscular Strength and Endurance among the engineering and pharmacy students Subjects Mean Std. Deviation D.f. Mean Difference t value

Engineering Pharmacy
* Significant

41.35 36.70

5.44 4.52 38 4.65 2.94

at 0.05 level of significance (38)(0.05)= 2.042

Table no.3 shows that mean scores of engineering and pharmacy students are 41.35 and 36.70 respectively, whereas standard deviation of engineering and pharmacy students are 5.44 and 4.52 respectively. Here the calculated t-value 2.94 is higher than required t value 2.042. Hence there is significant difference between Pharmacy and Engineering students in relation to muscular strength and endurance at 0.05 level of significance.

35

45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Mean Std. Deviation engineering Pharmacy

Fig no. 2: Mean and standard deviation value of bent knee sit-ups. Table no. 3 Comparisons of agility among the Engineering and Pharmacy students Students Mean Std. Mean Df T value

Deviation Difference

Engineering Pharmacy

16.82 16.64

3.30 3.39

0.18

38

0.174*

* Insignificant

at 0.05 level of significance (38)(0.05)= 2.042

36

Table no.3 shows that mean scores of engineering and pharmacy students are 16.82 and 16.64 respectively, whereas standard deviation of engineering and pharmacy students are3.30 and 3.39 respectively. Here the calculated t-value 1.74 is lesser than required t value 2.042. Hence there is no significant difference between Pharmacy and Engineering students in relation to agility at 0.05 level of significance.

18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Mean Std. Deviation Engineering Pharmacy

Fig no. 3 Mean and standard deviation value of 410 shuttle run.

37

Table no. 4 Comparison of Explosive Legs Strength among the Engineering and Pharmacy students Students

Mean

Std.

Mean

Df

Deviation Difference Engineering Pharmacy

* Insignificant

t value

2.13 2.07

0.11 0.15 0.60 38 1.30*

at 0.05 level of significance (38)(0.05)= 2.042

Table no.4 shows that mean scores of engineering and pharmacy students are 2.13 and 2.07 respectively, whereas standard deviation of engineering and pharmacy students are 0.11 and 0.15 respectively. Here the calculated t-value1.30 is lesser than required t value 2.042. Hence there is no significant difference between Pharmacy and Engineering students in relation to explosive leg strength at 0.05 level of significance.

38

2.5

1.5 Engineering pharmacy 1

0.5

0 mean std. deviation

Fig no.4 Mean and standard deviation value of Standing Broad Jump. Table no.5 Comparison of Speed of Engineering and Pharmacy students Students Mean Std. Deviation Engineering Pharmacy
* Significant

Mean Difference

Df

t value

6.80 8.36

0.50 1.01 0.44 38 6.17*

at 0.05 level of significance (38)(0.05)= 2.042

39

Table no.5 shows that mean scores of engineering and pharmacy students are 6.80 and 8.36 respectively, whereas standard deviation of engineering and pharmacy students are 0.50 and 1.01 respectively. Here the calculated t-value 6.17 is higher than required t value 2.042. Hence there is significant difference between Pharmacy and Engineering students in relation to speed at 0.05 level of significance.

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Mean Std. Deviation Engineering Pharmacy

Fig no.5 Mean and standard deviation value of 50 Meters Dash.

40

Table no.6 Comparison of Cardiovascular Endurance among the Engineering and Pharmacy students Std. Students Mean Deviation Mean Difference Df t value

Engineering 2.25 Pharmacy

* Significant

0.29 0.29

0.81

38 8.73

3.06

at 0.05 level of significance (38) (0.05) = 2.042

Table no.6 shows that mean scores of engineering and pharmacy students are 2.25 and 3.06 respectively, whereas standard deviation of engineering and pharmacy students are 0.29and 0.29 respectively. Here the calculated t-value 8.73 is higher than required t value 2.042. Hence there is significant difference between Pharmacy and Engineering students in relation to cardio vascular endurance at 0.05 level of significance.

41

3.5

2.5

Engineering Pharmacy

1.5

0.5

0 Mean Std. Deviation

Fig no.6: Mean and standard deviation value of 600 Meters Run/Walk

42

Discussion of Finding
1. It was found that there was no significance difference in relation to arm and shoulder strength between Engineering and Pharmacy. This may be due to many factors that influence the performance level of students. 2. It was found that there was significance difference in relation to muscular strength and endurance between Engineering and Pharmacy. This may be due to many factors that influence the performance level of students. 3. It was found that there was no significance difference in relation to agility between Engineering and Pharmacy. This may be due to many factors that influence the performance level of students. 4. It was found that there was no significance difference in relation to explosive leg strength between Engineering and Pharmacy. This may be due to many factors that influence the performance level of students. 5. It was found that there was significance difference in relation to speed between Engineering and Pharmacy. This may be due

43

to many factors that influence the performance level of students. 6. It was found that there was significance difference in relation to cardio vascular endurance between Engineering and Pharmacy. This may be due to many factors that influence the performance level of students.