Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
US Cities
Sr.#.
US Cities
Atlanta
163
Denver
120
Boston
177
Dallas
123
Chicago
166
Minneapolis
125
Cleveland
126
Cleveland
126
Pittsburgh
134
Dallas
123
Denver
120
Phoenix
139
Detroit
144
Detroit
144
Houston
173
St. Louis
145
Los Angeles
160
Orlando
146
10
Miami
192
10
Los Angeles
160
11
Minneapolis
125
11
Seattle
162
12
New Orleans
167
12
Atlanta
163
13
New York
245
13
Chicago
166
14
Orlando
146
14
New Orleans
167
15
Phoenix
139
15
San Francisco
167
16
Pittsburgh
134
16
Houston
173
17
San Francisco
167
17
Boston
177
18
Seattle
162
18
Miami
192
19
St. Louis
145
19
Washington D.C.
207
20
Washington D.C.
207
20
New York
245
Total
3181
Median =
3181
No. of Cities
Mean
20
159.05
Median =
Mode
167
Q1 =(1 x n x 1) / 4 th Observation
=(1*20*1)/4
=5th Observation
Q1 =134
Sr.#.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
3 points shots
23
20
17
18
13
16
8
19
28
21
17
19
22
25
15
10
11
25
23
350
shots made
4
6
5
8
4
4
5
8
5
7
7
10
7
11
6
5
3
8
7
120
a.
b.
18
6
University
Columbia
Harvard
M.I.T
Michigan
Northwestern
Princeton
Stanford
Texas
Texas A & M
Yale
Total
Total Endowment
No .of Universities
Mean
Sr.#.
7.2
36.6
10.1
7.6
7.2
16.4
17.2
16.1
6.7
22.9
148
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
148
10
14.8
University
Texas A & M
Columbia
Northwestern
Michigan
M.I.T
Texas
Princeton
Stanford
Yale
Harvard
Mode
7.2
6.7
7.2 Solution (D) : First Quartile
7.2
7.6
Q1 =(1 x n + 1) / 4 th Observation
10.1
=2.5 th observation
16.1
Q1 =7.2
16.4
17.2
22.9 Solution (E) : Third Quartile
36.6
Q3 =(3n + 1) / 4 th Observation
=(3*10+1)/4
=7.75
Median = Value of (n+1)/2 th observation
Q3
=17
=(10+1)/2
=5.5
Median =
13.1
e. The toal endowment of all these 10 universities is $148 billions. As per statement
Sr.#.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Total
120
130
105
100
230
150
360
115
110
105
120
180
115
195
120
235
160
155
140
255
3200
Mean =
160
Median =
100
105
105
110
115
115
120
120
120
130
140
150
155
160
180
195
230
235
255
360
Value of (n+1)/2 th
observation
=(20+1)/2
=
Median =
10.5
135
Mode = 120
Sr.#.
Existing Homes
1
315.5
2
202.5
3
140.2
4
181.3
5
470.2
6
169.9
7
112.8
8
230
9
177.5
Total
1999.9
Mean
222.21
Ordered Values
Sr.#.
Existing Homes
1
112.8
2
140.2
3
169.9
4
177.5
5
181.3
6
202.5
7
230
8
315.5
9
470.2
New Homes
275.9
350.2
195.8
525
225.3
215.5
175
149.5
2112.2
264.03
New Homes
149.5
175
195.8
215.5
225.3
275.9
350.2
525
Median =
=
=
Difference =
(9+1)/2
5th observation
181.3
39.1
(8+1)/2
4.5
220.4
The calculations shows that the raise in median sales prices of new homes is higher than
the existing homes sales and difference is $39.1 thousands.
c. New Homes sales price are higher than existing home prices
The difference between existing and new home prices is 39.1
d. One year earlier the median sales prices of existing homes was $208.4
One year earlier the median sales prices of new homes was $249.
Existing Homes
208.4
181.3
27.1
13.0%
New Homes
249
220.4
28.6
11.5%
e. First the difference in sales prices for existing and new homes from one year
earlier prices, the %age impact in existing homes is higher than the new homes
Sr.#.
GDP forecasts
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
2.6
2.7
0.4
3.1
2.7
2.5
2.3
2.7
2.2
2.7
2.9
1.9
3.4
3.1
1.8
0.9
2.8
1.1
2.6
1.7
2
2.8
2.3
2.1
2
2.8
2.5
2.4
3.5
0.5
ordered
GDP
forecasts
0.4
0.5
0.9
1.1
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.5
2.6
2.6
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.9
3.1
3.1
3.4
3.5
Solution (a)
Minimum Forecast
Minimum Forecast
0.4
3.4
Solution (b)
Mean (%) =
2.3
(30+1)/2 th
Median (%) =observation
=
15.5
=
2.5
Mode (%) =
2.7
Solution (c)
Q1 (%) =(30+1)/4 th observation
=
7.75
First Quartile (%) =
2.0
Q3 (%) =(3(30)+1)/4 th observation
=
22.75
Third Quartile (%) =
2.8
Solution (d)
Arithmatic shows that the forecasts of economists is optimistic
Ordered data
Mean =
City
Highway
13.2
17.2
14.4
17.4
15.2
18.3
15.3
18.5
15.3
18.6
15.3
18.6
15.9
18.7
16
19
16.1
19.2
16.2
19.4
16.2
19.4
16.7
20.6
16.8
21.1
City
Highway
15.58
18.92
15.9
18.7
Mode =
15.3
18.6, 19.4
Sr.#.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
City
16.2
16.7
15.9
14.4
13.2
15.3
16.8
16
16.1
15.3
15.2
15.3
16.2
Highway
19.4
20.6
18.3
18.6
19.2
17.4
17.2
18.6
19
21.1
19.4
18.5
18.7
Conclusion :
All three performance measures are showing that the mileage at
Highway is better than City.
Disney Movies
Sr.#.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Revenue ($millions)
104
110
136
169
249
250
253
273
304
325
346
354
448
Total Revenue =
3321
Mean =
255.5
Pixar Movies
Sr.#.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Total Revenue =
3231
Mean =
538.5
Revenue ($millions)
362
363
485
525
631
865
363.0
Q1=(6+1)/4 th observation
=1.75th observation
=
362.8
169.0
Conclusion :
Q1=(13+1)/4 th observation
=3.5th observation
=
152.5
Maxima on the part of revenue of Pixar and Disney movies shows in the following
statistics that Pixar's revenue is greater than Disney movies.
Sr.#.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Total
Bowler's score
168
170
174
182
184
190
1068
X-U
-10.0
-8.0
-4.0
4.0
6.0
12.0
0
178.0
Variance =
75.2
Std. Dev. =
8.7
C.V (%) =
4.9
(X-U)2
100.0
64.0
16.0
16.0
36.0
144.0
376.0
Sr.#.
Models with
DVD Players ($)
Models without
DVD Players ($)
1
2
3
300
400
400
290
300
300
4
5
Total
450
500
2050
300
360
1550
Solution (A)
Mean ($)=
Min. Value =
Max. Value =
Range =
410.0
300
500
200.0
310.0
290
360
70.0
(X-Xbar)
(X-Xbar)2
40.0
-110.0
-10.0
90.0
-10.0
0.0
1600.0
12100.0
100.0
8100.0
100.0
22000
Variance =
Std. Dev. =
Models without DVD Players in Dollars
Models without
Sr.#.
DVD Players ($)
1
300
2
300
3
360
4
290
5
300
Total
5500.0
74.2
(X-Xbar)
(X-Xbar)2
-10.0
-10.0
50.0
-20.0
-10.0
0.0
100.0
100.0
2500.0
400.0
100.0
3200
Variance =
Std. Dev. =
800.0
28.3
Conclusion :
Standard variation of models with and without DVD players shows that when anybody like to buy models from
market he found that he has to pay a greater amount in case of DVD player rather than without DVD player.
Sr.#.
Sr.#.
(X-Xbar)
(X-Xbar)2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Total
43
35
34
58
30
30
36
266
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
43
35
34
58
30
30
36
5.0
-3.0
-4.0
20.0
-8.0
-8.0
-2.0
0.0
25.0
9.0
16.0
400.0
64.0
64.0
4.0
582
Mean ($)=
Min. Value =
Max. Value =
Range =
Total
Variance =
Std. Dev. =
38.0
30
58
28.0
Western Cities
Western citiies mean car rent =
Variance =
St. Dev. =
97.0
9.85
Eastern Cities
$38
12.3
3.5
$38
97
9.8
Conclusion :
Statistics shows that eastern cities having more variation like 97 against 12.3 and similarly standard
deviation $9.8 against $3.5 of western cities.
Pomona Data
Sr.#.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Total
Mean ($)=
Min. Value =
Max. Value =
Range =
45
55
60
49
50
435
48.3
28
60
32.0
Pomona Data
Sr.#.
Air Quality Index
1
28
2
42
3
58
4
48
5
6
7
8
9
45
55
60
49
50
Total :
(X-Xbar)
-20.3
-6.3
9.7
-0.3
(X-Xbar)2
413.4
40.1
93.4
0.1
-3.3
6.7
11.7
0.7
1.7
0.0
11.1
44.4
136.1
0.4
2.8
742.0
Variance =
Std. Dev. =
Anaheim Data
Mean
Variance
Std. Deviation
X bar =
s2=
s=
48.5
136
11.66
92.8
9.63
Conclusion(c) :
statistics shows that Air Index Quality of Pomona is better than Anaheim due to the lower standard deviation of
9.63 against 11.66.
Dawson Supply
Clark Distributions
Days of
Sr.#.
Delivery
Sr.#.
Days of
Delivery
(X-Xbar)
(X-Xbar)2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Total
11
10
9
10
11
11
10
11
10
10
103
0.7
-0.3
-1.3
-0.3
0.7
0.7
-0.3
0.7
-0.3
-0.3
0.0
0.5
0.1
1.7
0.1
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.1
4.1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Total
8
10
13
7
10
11
10
7
15
12
103
0.5
0.67
Mean (days)=
Min. Value =
Max. Value =
Range =
10.3
7
15
8.0
Mean (days)=
Min. Value =
Max. Value =
Range =
10.3
9
11
2.0
Variance =
Std. Dev. =
(X-Xbar)
(X-Xbar)2
-2.3
-0.3
2.7
-3.3
-0.3
0.7
-0.3
-3.3
4.7
1.7
0.0
5.3
0.1
7.3
10.9
0.1
0.5
0.1
10.9
22.1
2.9
60.1
Variance =
Std. Dev.=
6.7
2.58
Conclusion(c) :
Statistics shows that Dawson Supply distribution is more reliable due to Clark distribution because they ae deviating lesser than
clark dist. With .67 days rather than 2.58 std. dev. Of Clark distribution, also if we see on mean both distributions services are
supplying equally.
City Areas
Sr.#.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Total
Mean (days)=
Min. Value =
Max. Value =
Range =
Cost ($)
33
27
32
38
36
32
198
33.0
27
38
11.0
(X-Xbar)
0.0
-6.0
-1.0
5.0
3.0
-1.0
0.0
Variance =
Std. Dev. =
C.V.=
(X-Xbar)2
0.0
36.0
1.0
25.0
9.0
1.0
72.0
14.4
3.79
11.50%
Retirement Areas
Sr.#.
Cost ($)
1
29
2
32
3
32
4
34
5
34
6
31
Total
192
Mean (days)=
Min. Value =
Max. Value =
Range =
32.0
29
34
5.0
(X-Xbar)
-3.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
2.0
-1.0
0.0
Variance =
Std. Dev.=
C.V.=
(X-Xbar)2
9.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
4.0
1.0
18.0
3.6
1.90
5.93%
Conclusion:
Statistics shows that standard deviation of Retirement areas is 1.90 against 3.79 of City areas and the mean value of both are
showing that Retirement Areas costs on average are 32 against City areas 33. Both facts proves that Grocery costs of Retirement
areas are better than City areas and there is an appeal for customers to save money. Similarly C.of Variation are showing that
Retirement areas having lesser variance than City Areas.
2005 season
Sr.#.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Total
Mean (days)=
Min. Value =
Max. Value =
Range =
scores
(X-Xbar)
(X-Xbar)2
2006 season
Sr.#.
74
78
79
77
75
73
75
77
608
-2.0
2.0
3.0
1.0
-1.0
-3.0
-1.0
1.0
0.0
4.0
4.0
9.0
1.0
1.0
9.0
1.0
1.0
30.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Total
71
70
75
77
85
80
71
79
608
76.0
73
79
6.0
Variance =
Std. Dev. =
4.3
2.07
Mean (days)=
Min. Value =
Max. Value =
Range =
76.0
70
85
15.0
C.V.=
2.72%
scores
(X-Xbar)
(X-Xbar)2
-5.0
-6.0
-1.0
1.0
9.0
4.0
-5.0
3.0
0.0
25.0
36.0
1.0
1.0
81.0
16.0
25.0
9.0
194.0
Variance =
Std. Dev.=
C.V.=
27.7
5.26
6.93%
Conclusion:
Statistics are showing that both years having seam mean value, but when we look at the variance and standard deviations the
scores of 2005 are better than 2006 seanson and this also results that Co efficienct of varation of 2005 is 2.7 rather than 6.93 of
2006 season. and no improvement is seeing in 2006 season.
time
0.92
0.98
1.04
0.9
0.99
4.83
Mean (days)=
Min. Value =
Max. Value =
Range =
1.0
0.9
1.04
0.1
(X-Xbar)
-0.046
0.014
0.074
-0.066
0.024
0.0
Variance =
Std. Dev. =
C.V.=
(X-Xbar)2
0.002
0.000
0.005
0.004
0.001
0.013
0.003
0.0564
5.84
Mile Times
Sr.#.
1
2
3
4
5
Total
time
4.52
4.35
4.6
4.7
4.5
22.67
(X-Xbar)
-0.014
-0.184
0.066
0.166
-0.034
0.0
Mean (days)=
Min. Value =
Max. Value =
Range =
4.5
4.35
4.7
0.4
Variance =
Std. Dev. =
C.V.=
(X-Xbar)2
0.000
0.034
0.004
0.028
0.001
0.067
0.017
0.1295
2.86
Conclusion:
Results shows that quarter miles are most consistent due to lower standard deviation .0564 as compare to Mile times which are
.1295. This also showed in C.V%age that is 5.84% of Quarter Miles as compare to 2.86% of Mile Times. Coach is saying true.