THE ARMED FORCES (SPECIAL POWERS) ACT, 1958 (AFSPA)

The lofty proclamations of liberal democracy like: equality, liberty and right to life are the main principles of social contract signed by the Modern Nation-States to legitimize itself, values as liberal democracy, where citizens rights are sacrosanct, where individual rights are supposed to be the foundation in the structure of governance mechanisms including the coercive apparatus like the army, paramilitary, and the police. However, the reality is different. The existence of extremely draconian acts like the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA), The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), Chhattisgarh Special Public Security Act, National Security Act, and various provisions in the penal code like sedition make a mockery of the claims of liberal democratic character of the Indian state. These claims are equally fraudulent and hilarious as the proclamations are made by the representations of the Indian ruling classes in forums like the United Nations, G20, World Economic Forum, etc. The propaganda machines for the neo-liberal exploitation parade India as the largest democracy and an emerging economic power-house. While the fact that more than 77% of the population lives a sub-human existence of 20 rupees a day, the trampling of the human rights of the poor Dalits, women, national ethnic and religious minorities with impunity is the order of the day. Operation Green Hunt is one of the prime examples. The rights provided in the Indian Constitution like: right to life and dignity, expression, etc., are reduced to cruel jokes on a hapless people. Numerous false encounter killings, custodial deaths/rape, rape of women, gangrapes, torture, disappearances, etc., are the stark realities of the so-called largest Democracy and Emerging Economic Power.

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

Recently discovered thousands of unmarked graves in Kashmir are a horrifying testimony of the state of human right to life and the legality of extrajudicial killings, which of course involves both rape and murder. The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act of 1958 (AFSPA) is one of the most draconian legislations used by the Indian rulers to enslave and oppress peoples under the garb of fighting separatism. For the past sixty years the North-East, and for almost two decades Kashmir, both have been virtually under army rule. This rule by the army has had a drastic effect on the daily life of the average citizen residing in the North-East and Kashmir. There is a state of de-facto abrogation of fundamental rights, including the all-important right to life, and large-scale encroachment by the army on the life and liberty of the citizens in the above-mentioned areas. AFSPA violates the fundamental constitutional rights of right to life, liberty, equality, freedom of speech and expression, peaceful assembly, moving freely, practice of any profession, protection against arbitrary arrest and freedom of religion enshrined in Articles 21, 14, 19, 22 and 25 of the Constitution. AFSPA has been used in these regions for thousands of deaths, custodial deaths/rape, torture, encirclement of the civilian population, sadistic combing operations, looting of private citizens property, etc. Thousands of youth have simply disappeared - another euphemism for encounter deaths. Draconian laws are antithetical to modern democracy since they overturn the fundamental tenets of modern jurisprudence on which democracy rests, viz., a person is presumed to be innocent till proven guilty. The genre of draconian laws thereby makes it difficult for persons booked under it to redress their grievances and get relief, such as bail. It grants extraordinary power to the investigating agencies (police, etc.) to elicit confessions, etc. Thus, the act empowers the investigating agencies to easily frame a person whom they suspect to be guilty.

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

Provisions of the AFSPA are far more severe. The provisions of the act provide special powers to the Governor, whereby he can at his own discretion (without consulting the duly elected Chief Minister), by notification in the Official Gazette, declare the whole or part of the state or union territory to be disturbed area. Bypassing the duly elected and representative political authority is tantamount to de-facto imposition of emergency. Unlike other draconian laws, the AFSPA does not stop at providing special powers to the investigating agency to elicit confession and to conduct search and arrest operations. It in fact provides the investigating agency with absolute powers whereby, even a havaldar, if he is of the opinion that it is necessary to fire or otherwise use force, even to the causing of death, can make use of the provisions of the act, thereby, harming the democratic fabric of the country. More disturbingly, even while it provides the Armed Forces with such absolute powers, it also provides them with immunity from any legal accountability. Even though the acts are in operation in the states and union territories of the country, the elected initiate legal proceedings, let alone administrative, against Armed Forces without prior sanction of the Central Government. (License to Kill, INSAF, 2005) Provisions of the Act Section 1 defines the title of the Act. Section 2(a) limits the jurisdiction of the Act to the seven states of the North-East; of late, it has been extended to Kashmir. (b) Defines disturbed area as an area notified under Section 3 to be a disturbed area. Section 3 states that if the Governor of a State or Central Government is of the opinion that an area is in such a disturbed or dangerous state that the use of armed forces in aid of civil power is necessary, then either of them can declare it to be disturbed area by notification in the Gazette.

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

Section 4 gives the following special powers to any Commissioned Officer, Warrant Officer or Non-Commissioned Officer of the armed forces in a disturbed area: (a) If in his opinion, it is necessary for maintenance for public order to fire even to the extent of causing death or otherwise use force against a person who is acting in contravention of an order prohibiting the assembly of five or more persons or the carrying of weapons or of things capable of being used as weapons. (b) If in his opinion, it is necessary to do so, then to destroy any arms dump or fortified position, any shelter from which armed attacks are made or are likely to be made, and any structure used as training camp for armed volunteers or as a hide-out for armed gangs or absconders. (c) Arrest without warrant any person who has committed a cognizable offence or against whom a reasonable suspicion exists that he has committed or is likely to commit a cognizable offence and to use whatever force is necessary to affect the arrest. (d) To enter and search without warrant any premises to make an arrest or to recover any person wrongfully confined or to recover any arms, ammunition, explosive substance or suspected stolen property. Section 5 makes it mandatory for the army to hand over a person arrested under the Act to the nearest police station with least possible delay. Section 6 lays down that prosecution, suit or other legal proceedings can be instituted against a person acting under the act, only after getting previous sanction of the Central Government. Historical Background of AFSPA The AFSPA gives the armed forces wide powers to shoot, arrest and search all in the name of aiding civil power. It was first applied to the north-eastern states of Assam and Manipur, and was amended in 1972 to extend to all the seven states in the
6

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

north-eastern region of India. They are Assam, Manipur, Tripura, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram and Nagaland, also known as the Seven Sisters. The enforcement of the AFSPA has resulted in innumerable incidents of arbitrary detention, torture, rape and looting by security personnel. This legislation is sought to be justified by the Government of India, on the plea that it is required to stop the North-East states from seceding from the Indian Union. There is a strong movement for self-determination which precedes the formation of the Indian Union. As the great Himalayan range dividing South and Central Asia runs down the east, it takes a southward curve and splits into lower hill ranges. The hills are punctuated by valleys and the valleys are washed by the rivers that drain into the Bay of Bengal. Waves of people settled in these blue hills and green valleys at various times in history. They brought with them cultures and traditions. The new interacted with the old and evolved into the unique cultural mosaic that characterizes the region. Through the centuries, these hills and valleys have bridged South, South-East, and Central Asia. On todays geo-political map, a large part of the original region constitutes the seven states of the Republic of India, but its political, economic and socio-cultural systems have always been linked with South-East Asia. The great Hindu and Muslim empires that reigned over the Indian sub-continent never extended east of the Brahmaputra River. Indias British colonizers were the first to break this barrier. In the early 19th century they moved in to check Burmese expansion into todays Manipur and Assam. The British, with the help of the then Manipur King, Gambhir Singh, crushed the Burmese imperialist dream and the treaty of Yandabo was signed in 1828. Under this treaty, Assam became a part of British India, and British continued to influence the political affairs of the region. This undue interference eventually led to the bloody AngloManipuri conflict of 1891. The British reaffirmed their position

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

but were cognizant of the ferocious spirit of independence of these people and did not administer directly but only through the King. It was during the Second World War, when the Japanese tried to enter the Indian sub-continent through this narrow corridor, that the strategic significance of the region to the Indian armed forces was realized. With the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, a disenchanted Japanese had to retreat from the Imphal and Kohima fronts; however the importance of control over the region subsequently remained a priority for the Government of India. With the end of the war, the global political map was changed overnight. As the British were preparing to leave Asia, the Political Department of the British Government planned to carve out a buffer state consisting of the Naga Hills, Mikir Hills, Sadiya Area, Balipara Tract, Manipur, Lushai Hills, Khasi Hills, and hills in Assam, as well as the Chin Hills and the hills of northern Burma. The impending departure of the British created confusion and turmoil over how to fill the political vacuum they would leave behind. Ultimately, the various territories were parceled out to Nehrus India, Jinnahs Pakistan, and Aung Sangs Burma, according to strategic requirements. As expected, there were some rumblings between the new Asiatic powers on who should get how much. Compromises were made, and issues were finally settled in distant capitals, to the satisfaction of the new rulers. The people who had been dwelling in these hills and valleys for thousands of years were systematically excluded from the consultation process. The Indian greed of the disputed British colonial cake in this region constitutes the present Seven Sisters states of the North-East. Over the years, local democratic movements evolved as the people aspired to a new social and political order. One important example is a strong popular democratic movement against feudalism and colonialism in Manipur led by Hijam Irabot. After the departure of the British, the Kingdom of Manipur was reconstituted as a constitutional monarchy by passing the Manipur Constitution Act, 1947.
8

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

Elections were held under the new constitution. A legislative assembly was formed. In 1949 V.P. Menon, a senior representative of Government of India, invited the King to a meeting on the pretext of discussing the deteriorating law and order situation in the state in Shillong. Upon his arrival, the King was forced to sign under duress. The agreement was never ratified in the Manipur Legislative Assembly. Rather, the Assembly was dissolved and Manipur was kept under the charge of a Chief Commissioner. There were strong protests, but by using violent brutal state repression, the Government of India has been ruthlessly suppressing the democratic movement in Manipur. The Deception in Nagaland At the beginning of the century, the inhabitants of the Naga Hills, which extend across the Indo-Burmese border, came together under the banner of Naga National Council (NNC), aspiring for a common homeland and self-governance. As early as 1929, the NNC petitioned the Simon Commission, which was examining the feasibility of future of self-governance of India. The Naga leaders forcefully articulated the demand of selfgovernance once British pulled out of India. Gandhi publicly announced that Nagas had every right to be independent. Under the Hydari Agreement signed between NNC and British administration, Nagaland was granted protected status for ten years, after which the Nagas would decide whether they should stay in the Indian Union or not. However, shortly after the British withdrew, the new Indian rulers colonized Nagaland and claimed it to be Indian Territory. Articulating the democratic aspirations of the people of Nagaland, The Naga National Council proclaimed Nagalands independence. In retaliation, Indian authorities arrested the Naga leaders. The AFSPA is one of the instruments which the Indian state used to violently suppress the democratic aspirations of the people of North-East. In 1975, some Naga leaders held talks with the Government of India which resulted in the Shillong agreement - this

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

agreement was forced on them. Democratic forces of Nagaland smelt a rat in this deceptive agreement and rallied the people behind them for the national liberation of Nagas. One of the voices which articulates the democratic demand of Naga people for national liberation is National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN). Mizoram In the Lushai Hills of Assam in the early sixties, a famine broke out. A relief team requested for help from the Government of India. But there was little help. The relief team organised themselves into the Mizo National Front (MNF) to liberate themselves from the neocolonial occupation of India. Against the democratic aspirations of the people, the Indian army moved in. This is the only place in India where the Indian security forces actually aerially bombed its own civilian population. The armed forces compelled people to leave their homes and dumped them on the road-side to set up new villages, so that the armed forces would be able to control them. This devasted the structure of the Mizo society. In 1986, the Mizo Accord was signed between MNF and Government of India. This accord was as deceptive as the Shillong Accord made with the Nagas earlier. Much of this bloodshed and genocides by the Indian state could have been avoided if the Indian ruling classes had listened to the voices of democratic aspirations of the people of Nagaland and the rights of colonized nationalities. This brutal, force accession was based on a feudal, brahamanical and patriarchal notion of the so-called Indian mainstream based on the dominant Aryan brahamanical culture, destroying the cultures and aspirations of national, linguistic, ethnic and religious minorities, in the process eliminating indigenous populations. Culturally the high caste dominated feudal Indian society is totally incompatible with the ethics of North-East cultures, which were by and large democratic and egalitarian. To make matters worse, the Indian ruling classes forcibly clubbed these different non-feudal ethnic groups with Adivasis cheating them in the name of scheduled tribes and in the process forcing them
10

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

to be marginalized and stigmatized by the upper caste ruling elites of India. The languages of the North-East are of the Tibeto-Chinese family rather than the Indo-Aryan of Dravidian like the rest of India. Until the later Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, none of the TibetoChinese languages were recognized as Indian languages. Politically dependent, the North-East is being economically undermined; the traditional trade routes with South-East Asia and Bangladesh have been closed. It was kept out of the Government of Indias massive infrastructural development in the five year plans. Gradually, it became the neocolonial hinterland for exploitation by the Indian state, where local industries were made worthless and now the people are entirely dependent on goods and businesses owned predominantly by those from the Indo-Gangetic plains. The new Indian unscrupulous businesses pull the economic strings of this region. All the states of the North-East are connected to India by the chicken neck - a narrow corridor between Bangladesh and Bhutan. At partition, the area was cut off from the nearest port of Chittagong, in what is now Bangladesh, reducing traffic to and from the region to a trickle. The states in the region are largely unconnected to Indias vast rail system. Indian ruling classes freely exploit the natural resources of the North-East. Assam produces one-fourth of all petroleum for India, yet it is processed outside of Assam, so the state does not receive the revenues. Manipur, Nagaland and Mizoram are far far behind. In a rough calculation, in the infrastructural development, North-East region lags behind the rest of the country by more than 40%. Even strictly neutral and independent observers have pointed out that in the North-East insurgency and underdevelopment have been closely linked in such a situation that strong-arm tactics will only help to further alienate the people. The shifting demographic balance due to large-scale immigration from within and outside the country is another

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

11

source of frustration. The indigenous people fear that they will be outnumbered by outsiders in their own land. Laborers from Bihar and Bengal, who live under rigidly feudal, casteist socioeconomic conditions in their own states, are ready for all kinds of menial jobs at much lower wages. As they pour in, more and more local laborers are being edged out of their jobs. Illegal immigration from Bangladesh and Nepal is also perceived as a threat. In Tripura, the indigenous population has been reduced to a mere 25% of the total population of the state because of large-scale immigration from the North-East and Bangladesh. The Indian states primary interest in the North-East was strategic, and so was its response to problems. A series of repressive laws were passed by the Government of India in order to deal with the rising national liberation aspirations of the people of North-East. In 1953, the Assam Maintenance of Public Order (Autonomous District) Regulation Act was passed. It was applicable to the then Naga Hills and Tuensang districts. It empowered the Governor to impose collective fines, prohibit public meetings, and detain anybody without a warrant. On 22 May 1958 (a mere 12 days after the Budget Session of Parliament was over), the Armed Forces (Assam & Manipur) Special Powers Ordinance was passed. A bill was introduced in the Monsoon session of Parliament that year. Amongst those who cautioned against such blanket powers to the Army included the then Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha Mr. P.N. Sapru. In a brief discussion that lasted for three hours, in the Rajya Sabha, Parliament approved the Armed Forces (Assam & Manipur) Special Powers Act retrospectively from 22 May 1958. Enactment of AFSPA From Colonialism to Neocolonialism After the transfer of power in 1947, the Indian ruling classes enacted draconian laws like AFSPA for the neocolonial exploitation and to suppress the aspirations of democracy and national liberation in North-East. Since two decades, it has been imposed in Kashmir, resulting in thousands of extrajudicial murders, torture, rapes and custodial killings.
12

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

My friend Nayan writes With the so-called de-colonization, India along with its South Asian neighbors, entered a period of socio-economic restructuring, declaring itself a democratic secular republic, whence it sought to self-fashion its path of economic progress and development springing from its backward stagnant agrarian economy. The much trumpeted Nehruvian welfare state was the result - with its techno managerial elite and a vision of socialist tinged, non-aligned path, it was a model that was built on the back of a heavy security-centric approach in its periphery, where resided a population which was to be excluded from this vision, only to be integrated as the other on the centers terms whenever it saw fit. Thus it points to the intrinsic link between development, modernization and exclusion which can be almost through a strict militization. The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 or AFSPA, which was a continuation of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Ordinance of 1942 of British colonial regime, is the clearest instance of this. North-East India is one of South Asias most contested spaces. Contestations have taken many forms - from armed opposition to the Indian state, movement for separate federal states and autonomous units based on ethnic lines, to struggles against extractive industries and for more funds from central government. The AFSPA stands almost in centrality of creating spaces for such contestation, with the content of the Act having changed little over the last 50 years and impacting North-East India and South Asia in profound ways. The Act itself stems from the specific context of North-Easts integration into postcolonial India emerged out of a dominant mainstream Hindu (even as enshrined secular) Nationalist imagination. Long drawn self-determination struggles, first inaugurated by Naga rebellion who asserted their own independent history, became the defining characteristic of the region which is materially, and ideationally a space distinct from the larger vision of a developing India. While India contains diverse regions and holistic national polity or even a national society however unassimilated, there is a strong belief in both the Indian mainland and in most of the North-East itself, that an unbridgeable binary/gap exists in the two regions. This then

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

13

makes one understand how a law like the AFSPA with its extraordinary provisions by any measure, persists in Indias democratic polity for 52 years. Disunity as a factor that led to British rule over South Asia had been a part and parcel of the awareness of nationalist awakening since the 19th century. The trauma of partition at independence accentuated the anxiety of disunity. Emergence of the post-revolutionary regime in 1949 in China heightened the sense of persecutory anxiety once represented by castrating Muslim plunderers and bad British-colonial mother. Thus, long before insurgency became the defining characteristic of NorthEast, referring to Assam, the land of nationalist Gopinath Bordoloi, and political leadership of Manipur, Sardar Patel wrote to Jawaharlal Nehru, The people inhabiting these portions have no established loyalty or devotion to India. Even the Darjeeling and Kalimpong areas are not free from proMongoloid prejudices defining the population clearly as the cultural other. While there are other instances of Merger Agreements being signed in situations of stress and duress (Jammu & Kashmir) as well as of military intervention (the police action that ended Nizams rule in Hyderabad in 1948), what makes the Manipur situation unique is the steam-rolling of democratic institutions that the merger represents, the irony of a state (India) which at that time aspired to be a democratic republic, but was not one yet, effectively undermining the foundations of an existing democratic state through a basically military manoeuvre, makes the case of Manipur quite exceptional. That all this was justified not by reference to the will of the people of the territories concerned (as was the case with Hyderabad) or by a response to internal aggression (as is said to be the case with Jammu & Kashmir), but by invoking a strategic necessity is all the more revealing. The reason cited for the decision to take over: Manipur is a border state and backward, therefore its take over is a strategic necessity. These were the expressions used by V.P. Menon (then Home Minister Sardar Vallabhai Patels able bureaucratic lieutenant, who has been described as the Arch Manoeuverer of
14

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

Integration) when referring to the merger of Manipur with the Indian Dominion. The fact that he uses the expression take over to mean integration speaks for itself. (Nayanjyoti) A border state that is also backward needs to be taken over because it is a strategic necessity. A backward people need not be consulted about whether they would actually like to be taken over. A battalion marches in, and a population is told by the armed forces of a state that is still trying to get its own constitution together, that the constitutions that backward people give to themselves, or the democratic institutions that they evolve in the course of their history, are of no consequence. What is of consequence is the strategic necessity of the emerging Indian state, trying to live up to the imperatives of its imperial inheritance (see Bimol Akoijam Another 9/11, Another Act of Terror - The Embedded Disorder of the AFSPA). Writing further about the nature of AFSPA, Nayan says: A cursory reading of AFSPA reveals that the Act is an act of legitimizing the involvement of the military in the domestic space, not supplementing by replacing civil power. The military character of the Act is reflected in multiple ways. AFSPA allows use of armed forces, defined as military forces and the air forces operating as land forces and any other armed forces of the union (Section 3) in the domestic space. Section 2(c) of the Act also clearly shows the close affinity between AFSPA and those laws governing the military, such as the Army Act (1950). It reads, All other words and expressions used herein but not defined in the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Army Act, 1950, shall have the meaning respectively assigned to them in those Acts. In six sections, being one of the most shortest Acts to be passed in the history of the Indian legislation, it unmasks the military paradigm involved. For example, what constitutes the disturbed and dangerous condition for an area to be declared a disturbed area in not defined at all (Section 3). All that is required, is that an area be declared as a disturbed area. It is as good or

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

15

bad as declaring war, once it is so declared, what it means is clear. In fact, the principle of war is unmistakable here. Just like declaring war, once an area is declared as disturbed area, the personnel of the armed forces simultaneously acquire powers to us force as may be necessary based on their opinion and suspicion to effect arrest without warrant or fire upon or otherwise use force, even to causing death. (Section 4). Also, unlike assumption of innocence of a suspect or accused in the domestic space, hostile intention of the inhabitants of the alien and hostile space is taken for granted for the military personnel. Thus, the opinion and suspicion of the commanding officer of a military formation serves as the basis for exercising power to fire upon or otherwise use force which he thinks is necessary not only to search any premises or destroy any shelter and structure but also arrest or even to causing death. (Section 4). The presumption of hostile intent as the legitimate basis for the armed forces to take action, characteristic of a war zone, is highlighted when these powers can also be exercised for acts that are likely to be made or about to be committed. Besides, the nature of the power conferred upon the armed forces, the fact that commanding officers are given the power to judge and execute action on his own, only proves that the Act is based on the business of war. In a war situation, any officer irrespective of whether he is a Commissioned, Junior Commissioned or Non-Commissioned Officer - leading his men in the field has to be the judge as well as part of the body that executes his judgments. In the context of maintaining law and order within the domestic space, the same person or body cannot be the judge as well as the one who executes the judgment. Moreover, the soldiers operational space, that is alien and hostile, is a relatively undifferentiated space and it does not require elaborate conditions and procedures as in the case of the differentiated domestic space. Hence, unlike other Acts (including the erstwhile POTA) which provide explicit conditions and elaborate procedures running into pages, AFSPA is hardly a one-page Act with six sections. All that the Act requires is to
16

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

restate the assumption of taken-for-granted hostile intent (based on opinion and suspicion) of the inhabitants of the alien and hostile space (disturbed) to exercise the power to eliminate, destroy or neutralize the latter (Section 4). AFSPA does not have any provision for interrogation and/or gathering evidence. Nor is it like any other so-called special laws, meant to facilitate trial or enhance conviction rate. It is plainly an instrument of war empowering the military and forces operating under it to eliminate, neutralize and destroy the enemy or suspected enemies, which more often than not practically include everybody residing in the disturbed area. Enough instances are there to show that civilians in a disturbed area are also inherent targets under the Act. Civilians are always at the receiving end of the Act, as in any other war zone in alien territory forming part and parcel of the collateral damage thus making indiscriminate firing and killing of civilians, including women and children, by security forces intrinsic to the use rather than deployment of the military, in concrete terms insurgency has spread and thrived in the NorthEast. This begs the question: What has the military been doing all these decades and how has AFSPA furthered counterinsurgency? Such questions, along with subversion of democratic institutions and principles through prolonged and continuous deployment of the armed forces under AFSPA, raise questions of militarism i.e., a phenomenon by which a nations armed services come to put their institutional preservation ahead of achieving national security or even commitment to the integrity of the government structure of which they are a part, which goes far beyond the idea of the military or use of military per se in counter-insurgency. Interestingly, it was observed that American troops deployed and engaged in actual combat in the recent Iraq war primarily came from the American soil, not from its military bases in foreign countries. In this sense, the American network of (military) bases is not a sign of military preparedness but of militarism. In a similar sense, continuous enforcement of AFSPA and deployment of troops under the Act seem to serve as a reminder of a presence rather than combating the

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

17

insurgency per se in the region. The columns of armed forces during combing operations and troops patrolling the streets, towns and villages have not restricted the activities of the insurgents who are as active as, if not more than, they were twenty years ago. But these movements and activities of the armed forces definitely convey the presence of the might of the Indian state to the people. This reminder is also communicated in frightening dimensions by the so-called excesses in which men, women and children are killed in retaliation to attacks on the armed forces by the insurgents. More than being cases of human rights abuses, those excesses for which no accountability can be fixed on anybody are reminders of the militarism that has subverted the democratic institutions and ethos in the North-East. (See Nayanjyoti: Integrate, Develop or Shooting-to-Kill on Suspicion in a South Asian Periphery, the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act in North-East India. Term paper submitted by Nayanjyoti to CSSS/SSS/JNU.)

18

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

IROM SHARMILAS STRUGGLE AND HER BODY AS A SITE OF CONTESTATION

Indian Army Rape Us read the banner which the women were holding when they protested against the murder and death of Manorama Devi in front of Army Headquarters in Imphal (Manipur) in the year 2004. Thangjam Manorama, a Manipuri woman, was raped and murdered by jawans of Rashtriya Rifles in July 2004. Testifying before the (retired) Justice Upendra Inquiry Commission, instituted to probe the circumstances leading to the death of Ms. Manorama, her bereaved mother said that around seven or eight personnel of the Assam Rifles (AR) violently entered their house in the intervening night of July 10 and 11, and one of the personnel pointing his gun at her, asked about Ms. Manorama. At that point of time, Manorama came out of her room and the AR men pounced on her and took her towards the verandah. She further said that Manorama was dragged outside the house and the personnel severely beat her up, and that she could hear the muffled voice of her daughter. After sometime, the personnel brought Manorama back into the house. At this time, the mother said that Manorama was clutching her phanek (a sarong-like traditional garment worn by Manipuri women) with her left hand, and that her shirt was unbuttoned. The personnel made out an arrest memo and got Manoramas mother to put her thumb impression on the memo. Before taking her away, the personnel allowed Ms. Manorama to change into a new phanek and shirt. The mother said that the lifeless body was discovered at Yaipharok Manik village the next morning. The autopsy on Manoramas body was conducted at the Regional Institute of Medical Sciences hospital in Imphal, the state capital, after the Irilbung police picked up her body. Testifying before the Upendra Commission, the doctors who conducted the

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

19

autopsy confirmed the presence of semen on the undergarments of the victim, and more than half a dozen bullet injuries, including the genitals. The spokesman of the security forces, while claiming responsibility for the killing of a hard core PLA cadre, stated that they had acted on the basis of specific information about the presence of PLA cadres at Bamon Kampu area. They went on to state that, on this basis, an AR team rushed to the area and apprehended Manorama. During interrogation, she disclosed that she possessed an AK-47 rifle and was willing to take the army personnel to recover the weapon. However, on the way, she was gunned down by the AR personnel as she made a bid to escape by jumping down from the army vehicle. One radio set, hand grenade and some incriminating documents were recovered from her possession. On the face of it, these accounts seem no different from the familiar stories that emanate from the normal world of counter-insurgency operations in the North-East. The bereaved mothers statement could have been any unofficial account, made only to be delegitimised by official spokesmen as baseless allegations made by vested parties against the patriotic soldiers of the Indian security forces fighting the enemy within. The post-hoc statements of the army officials would have been the final say on the official reality of the situation on how they have eliminated an enemy. This time, however, there was a Freudian slip that revealed the inner reality beneath the normality of hitherto familiar counter-insurgency narratives in the North-East. Havaldar Suresh Kumar of the Assam Rifles, who signed the arrest memo, inscribed on the memo that Ms. Manorama was being arrested as a suspect and that nothing had been taken from her house or her person. There is no legal absurdity in the killing of Ms. Manorama under the AFSPA. What does ring hollow is the incredulity of a narrative that features a group of armed men of the mighty India military having necessarily to fire more half-a-dozen bullets in order to subdue a women dressed in phanek while
20

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

she was allegedly trying to escape from them by jumping down from their vehicle, and that too late at night. Havaldar Suresh Kumars inscription on the arrest memo says that nothing was recovered from her - meaning she was un-armed. The post-hoc statement by the spokesman of the security forces, on the other hand, mentions the recovery of a hand grenade, a radio set and incriminating documents from her possession. The death of Manorama opened out issues that became too unpalatable for the brutalized people of Manipur. Indeed, for many, this was the last straw. Venting decades of suppressed rage, a group of prominent women in the community protested by disrobing and staging a Naked Protest in front of the Assam Rifles Headquarters in the heart of Imphal City. They shouted, Rape us, kill us, take our flesh, while attempting to break open the gate of the AR Headquarters. In immediate response, an indefinite curfew was imposed in Imphal and the surrounding areas (see Bimol Akoijam - Another 9/11, Another Act of Terror - The Embedded Disorder of the AFSPA). The rape and murder of Manorama is not an isolated case, but thousands of these kinds of sexual assaults and murders happen to the women in the North-East every day since the past sixty years. The Indian state and its killing machines use the body of the women in these areas to exercise the control on behalf of the Indian state. Irom Sharmila has been on a fast for the revocation of AFSPA since 11 years; her body also has become a site of contest for legality and illegality of the Indian state. Indian state, whose constitution guarantees right to life and liberty, also kills, rapes and murders thousands of women every passing year. Irom Sharmila has been arrested, rearrested and force-fed many times ostensibly to make her live, this was done by the authorities to stop her from dying - invoking the attempt to suicide of the Indian penal code. On the other hand, Indian security forces go on killing, raping and torturing women every day.

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

21

This exposes the farce of legality of the Indian system which has been imposed on the body of Irom Sharmila. The 39-year-old Manipuri is about to complete 11 years of a hunger strike in protest against AFSPA that gives security forces powers to kill with impunity. The UPA promised as far back as 2004, to replace the act with a more humane law but has shown little interest in taking up the task in the face of opposition from the internal security establishment. Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram recently admitted there was no consensus within the Government on the issue. Ms. Sharmilas fast began on 3rd November 2000, a day after security personnel shot down 10 people at a bus stand just outside Imphal. Within days, she was detained by the police. Since then, she has been nasally force-fed a liquid concoction of nutrients in a hospital, which serves as her prison. After every year in detention, she is released for a day and rearrested for attempting to commit suicide - because she refuses to call off her fast until the government repeals the legislation, which is in force in Manipur, Assam, Nagaland and parts of Arunachal Pradesh, besides Jammu & Kashmir. Hers may be the longest hunger strike in recorded history but it has generated little or no interest outside Manipur. In recent days, the attention Ms. Sharmila has received in the wake of Anna Hazares anticorruption hunger strike has served to highlight her personal life. She comes out as a resolute but lonely woman, caught between her iconic importance to the struggle against AFSPA and her human desire to lead a normal life, therefore making her struggle an epic struggle in modern Indian history. CONCLUSION In fact, by legitimizing the use of military force in the internal affairs of the state beyond what is already provided in the Criminal Procedure Code and the provisions of emergency in the constitution, AFSPA seeks to supplant rather than supplement civil authority with military authority in the administration of everyday life. There is no question that if exigency demands, the State, under the Indian constitution, can always promulgate an ordinance to use its military might to deal with that exigency. But to convert such an ordinance into
22

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

a regular law that stays in place for almost half a century is to entrench a military structure and ethos in the polity and structure of the state. It sets into motion the process of reproduction and appropriation of the military structure and ethos by other instruments of the State (the paramilitary and police) as well as civil society itself. Ultimately, it leads to a complete subversion of the basic foundation of society and polity. It blurs the necessary distinctions between the police and the military, between the civilian and the combatant, and between domestic and alien space. This is what has happened in Manipur. (Bimol Akoijam) As Bimol Akoijam says, the single Act AFSPA has given rise to a plethora of acts of horror, like the thousands of murders, rapes, custodial deaths/rapes, disappearances, torture, encirclements, combing operations and genocides. Recently discovered unmarked graves in Kashmir are a chilling testimony to these hard realities of everyday living in Kashmir and North-East. The list of such acts in the North-East is long, but to name a few well-known cases, from 1980 onwards, they include the massacres of civilians at Heirangoithong (Manipur) in 1984; at Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS Manipur) in 1995; at Malom (Manipur) in 2000; the horror of army torture and violence on civilians during Operation Blue Bird (Manipur) in 1987 and Operation Rhino (Assam) in 1991; indiscriminate firing on civilians by armed forces personnel when a tyre of their own vehicle burst in the town of Kohima (Nagaland) in March 1995; the shelling and destruction of the town of Makokchung (Nagaland) in 1994; the enforced disappearances of Loken and Lokendro (Manipur) in 1980; and the rape of Miss N. Sanjita [who subsequently committed suicide (Manipur)] in 2003. I would conclude by stating a fact-finding report-cum-demand by SAHELI-PUDR fact sheets. SAHELI and PUDR Fact Sheets and Demands Outside the North-East too, human rights violations in Jammu & Kashmir under the AFSPA are commonplace, including

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

23

disappearances, torture, arbitrary killings and numerous instances of mass rape of Kashmiri women by security forces. AFSPA: Constitutional Contradictions The large-scale violations of fundamental rights in the northeastern states is a direct consequence of the provisions of the AFSPA, of areas declared as Disturbed Areas under Section No. 3 and the simultaneous acquiring of wide powers by army personnel under Section 4 of the Act. The AFSPA which grants armed forces personnel the power to shoot to arrest, search, seize and even shoot-to-kill, violate the Right to Life enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India which guarantees the right to life to all people. The AFSPA also violates the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). India signed the ICCPR in 1978, taking on the responsibility of securing the rights guaranteed by the Covenant to all its citizens. In particular, the Act is in contravention of Article 6 of the ICCPR guaranteeing the right to life. Crucially, the AFSPA effectively undermines civil authority. For instance: After the Oinam incident (1987) the Chief Minister wrote to the Union Home Minister, The civil law has, unfortunately, ceased to operate in Senapati District Manipur due to excesses committed by the Assam Rifles with complete disregard shown to the civil administration.the Deputy Commissioner and the Superintendent of Police were wrongfully confined, humiliated and prevented from discharging their official duties by the Security Forces. And consequent to the Kohima incident in 1995, even the Superintendent of Police, Kohima, was stopped at gun point by army personnel. At the same time, the AFSPA is an emergency legislation that constitutionally requires to be reviewed every 6 months. Yet it has been imposed in Manipur and other states of the NorthEast for years on end, which contributes the misuse of unbridled and arbitrary powers by the armed forces.
24

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

END THE LAW THAT GIVES THE ARMED FORCES IMMUNITY FOR RAPE, MURDER, TORTURE AND OTHER HEINOUS CRIMES. END THE ARMED FORCES (SPECIAL POWERS) ACT, 1958 The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958: A Fact Sheet [A fact sheet adapted by the SAHELI and PUDR team from earlier reports and submissions to the Jeevan Reddy Committee] Over the last five decades, heavy militarization in the NorthEast has taken its toll on normal civilian life and led to innumerable instances of violations committed against the civilian populations there. Encounter deaths, extrajudicial killings, disappearances, arbitrary arrests, rape and torture have been a regular feature among the relentless series of atrocities meted out to the people by the army with impunity, especially in areas where they are protected by legislations like AFSPA. Some of the most widely known incidents of such excesses in the North-East are: Army torture and violence against the villagers of Oinam (Manipur) in 1987 who were detained in army camps, beaten mercilessly, given electric shocks. At least 3 women were raped, 15 villagers killed, and many left permanently disabled. The gang-rape of the women of Ujanmaidan (Tripura) by security forces. The terror wreaked by the army in Assam during Operation Rhino in 1991. The shelling of the town of Ukhrul (Manipur) with mortars in May 1994 by the Assam Rifles when they violently ransacked the town, leaving many homes damaged, over a hundred men and women bleeding with serious injuries and 3 dead.

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

25

Four women raped at gunpoint, and homes and shops set on fire by the Maratha Light Infantry, killing other people in December 1994 in Mokokchung (Nagaland). Indiscriminate firing on civilians and combing operations by the combined forces of the 16th Rashtriya Rifles, CRPF and Assam Rifles when a tyre of an army jeep burst in the Kohima town (Nagaland) in March 1995. Torture, forced detaining, starvation, sexual assault of women and looting in the 5 villages of Namtiram (Manipur) in 1995 by the 21st Rajputana Rifles. The armys reign of terror in Jesami (Manipur) in January 1996. The rampage of the village of Huishu (Manipur) by the Assam rifles in March 1996. The massacre of 10 innocent civilians by the Assam Rifles in Malom (Manipur) on 2nd November 2000 by security forces. The torture, rape and killing of Thangjam Manorama in Imphal (Manipur) in 2004.

26

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

REFERENCES 1. A. Bimol Akoijam Another 9/11, Another Act of Terror The Embedded Disorder of the AFSPA. 2. Nayanjyoti Integrate, Develop or Shooting-to-Kill on Suspicion in South Asian Periphery Term paper submitted to CSSS/SSS/JNU. 3. End Army Rule - Committee for the Repeal of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, Delhi. 4. An Illusion of Justice - PUDR Delhi 1998. 5. Licence to Kill INSAF, Delhi 2005. 6. Fantasies of Development and The Democracy Deficit in North East India by Sanjib Baruah. 7. An Analysis of Armed Forces Special Powers Act, 1958 PUCL and Asian Centre for Human Rights. 8. Manipur in the Shadow of AFSPA. 9. Love in the time of AFSPA. Hindu editorial. 10. Poem on Sharmila by Kamayani Bali Mahabal - Movement of India. 11. SAHELIPUDR Fact Sheet on Human Rights abused in North-East.

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

27

IROM SHARMILA IRON LADY OF MANIPUR

(from Wikipedia) Irom Sharmila Chanu (born March 14, 1972), also known as the Iron Lady of Manipur or Mengoubi (the fair one)[1] is a civil rights activist, political activist, and poet from the Indian state of Manipur. Since 2 November 2000, she has been on hunger strike to demand that the Indian government repeal the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 (AFSPA), which she blames for violence in Manipur and other parts of Indias northeast.[2] Having refused food and water for more than 500 weeks, she has been called the worlds longest hunger striker.[3] The following linked statement was released by her hand at the fortnightly habeas corpus hearing Lamphel Court Complex on November 30, 2011 and is the clearest statement of her satyagraha showing both her sanamahi/vaishnavaite and gandhian roots and her poetic style.[4] Contents 1 Decision to fast 2 Continued activism 3 International attention 4 Works on her life 5 References 1. Decision to fast On November 2, 2000, in Malom, a town in the Imphal Valley of Manipur, ten civilians were allegedly shot and killed by the Assam Rifles, one of the Indian Paramilitary forces operating in the state, while waiting at a bus stop.[5,6] The incident later
28

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

came to be known to activists as the Malom Massacre.[7] The next days local newspapers published graphic pictures of the dead bodies, including one of a 62-year old woman, Leisangbam Ibetomi, and 18-year old Sinam Chandramani, a 1988 National Child Bravery Award winner.[6] Sharmila, the 28-year-old daughter of a Grade IV veterinary worker, began to fast in protest of the killings, taking neither food nor water.[8] As her brother Irom Singhajit Singh recalled, The killings took place on 2 November 2000. It was a Thursday. Sharmila used to fast on Thursdays since she was a child. That day she was fasting too. She has just continued with her fast. 4 November is also given as the start day of her fast. On the Friday third of November she had her last supper of pastries and sweets then touched her mothers feet and asked permission to fulfill her bounden duty.[9] Her primary demand to the Indian government was the repeal of the AFSPA, which allowed soldiers to indefinitely detain any citizen on suspicion of being a rebel.[5]The act has been blamed by opposition and human rights groups for permitting torture, forced disappearances, and extrajudicial executions.[5,8] Three days after she began her strike, she was arrested by the police and charged with an attempt to commit suicide, which is unlawful under section 309 of the Indian Penal Code, and was later transferred to judicial custody.[9] Her health deteriorated rapidly, and the police then forcibly had to use nasogastric intubation in order to keep her alive while under arrest.[3] Since then, Irom Sharmila has been regularly released and re-arrested every year since under IPC section 309, a person who attempts to commit suicide is punishable with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year [or with fine, or with both].[9,10] However from 2005 additional constraints were imposed by the Manipur State the only official document authorizing this is one sent by the Home Secretariat purportedly in response to a request from the DG Police (Prisons) asking for the Home Secretariat to ban all further visitors to her who did not first gain their clearance. This letter was deemed supra vires the authority of the Home Secretariat by HH Roland Keishing the

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

29

Chief Judicial Magistrate Imphal East in a meeting with Sharmila in chambers February 2011. He had summoned the Sec Gen of the All Manipur Bar Association to chambers to assist Sharmila in High Court action to overturn the ban and assert her constitutional rights. However the lawyer later reneged on his promise a pattern that has been repeated now several times each time without explanation. But on the general principle of the illegality of AF(SP)A as can be noted below many human rights lawyers have made statements and resolutions in opposition to it. 2. Continued activism By 2004, Sharmila had become an icon of public.[5] Following her procedural release On 2 October 2006, for around four months, Irom Sharmila Chanu went to Raj Ghat, New Delhi, which she said was to pay floral tribute to my idol, Mahatma Gandhi. Later that evening, Sharmila headed for Jantar Mantar for a protest demonstration where she was joined by students, human rights activists and other concerned citizens.[8] On 6 October, she was re-arrested by the Delhi police for attempting suicide and was taken to the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, where she wrote letters to the Prime Minister, President, and Home Minister.[8] At this time, she met and won the support of Nobel-laureate Shirin Ebadi, the Nobel Laureate and human rights activist, who promised to take up Sharmilas cause at the United Nations Human Rights Council.[8] On 23 August 2011, Sharmila was involved in the wave of Anti-corruption movement on invitation by Anna Hazare via letter.[11,12] Following Mr Hazares promise to visit Imphal and support Sharmila there he announced in an interview with NDTV on September 13 that he would be sending two representatives to meet with Sharmila soon to prepare for the meeting[13] Trinamool Congress have reiterated their support for her.[14] The Communist Party of India (CPI ML) has also reiterated their support for her and for repeal of AF(SP)A[16] Neither group has responded to a request to make the moral support effective by pledging to denotify Disturbed Area Status from all of Manipur. Sharmila has been allowed to have her
30

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

own words reported first urging Dr Singh to reaffirm his pledge to do something about the inhumanity of the AF(SP)A[16] Also in that report conveyed via a University Chancellor and former IAS officer she urges the CM to allow visitors especially when they come from distant lands. In Assam many NGOs have come out supporting her and urging for repeal of AF(SP)A[17] The ToI appears to have replaced the Calcutta Telegraph as the mainland paper to break Manipuri news to the world. This year 2011 the Christian Church has also become active in supporting Sharmila and agitating against AF(SP)A. The NCCI which represents Protestant and Orthodox Christians (30 million of the 1.3 billion Indians but also the hill tribals of Manipur Nagas and Kuki Chin Federation about 40% of the population of Manipur) made their first unequivocal statement on this issue in November.[18] The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Guwahati HG Thomas Menamparampil also spoke out in defence of Sharmila.[19] Although he has few in his flock he has for some time been active in political agitation for peace in the area. Sharmilas spokesman has appealed to both sources directly for more effective support. Student Christians less effectively also offer moral support and prayer.[20] On 18 November 2011 H Premkrishna Esq presented a paper on Sharmila to the Indian Association of Lawyers who passed a resolution seeking the abolition of AF(SP)A[21] Regrettably there is still no Indian Lawyer willing to take High Court action to overturn the blanket ban on visitors imposed illegally upon Sharmila we are still actively searching for one. In similar vein in December the National Human Rights Council in its second universal periodic review of human rights in India again requested the Government to repeal AF(SP)A so that it can conform with its treaty rights under international law.[22] Although formed by the Government following the Paris protocols with the Prime Minister and Chief Justice as ex officio members it has no authority to compel the Government to conform with its treaty obligations under international law it may only advise the government when they are in breach of international law. The advice was echoed by the working group on human rights in India and the UN[23] The working group

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

31

also has no authority to compel the Indian Government to observe its treaty obligations under international law, they merely present the report to the UN which the Indian Government has been petitioning for a permanent place on its Security Council the body set up to supervise treaty obligations. Following these statements the banned UG (insurgency) outfit the Maoists Communist Party Manipur also issued a statement of support for Sharmila though one suspects this is another example of Manipuris infamous sense of humour.[24] And finally a film on the lighter side of Sharmila the poetess won the award for best documentary at the 2nd Siliguri International Short and Documentary film festival 23 November 2011[25] Pune University has announced a scholarship program for 39 Manipuri women students to take degree courses commencing academic year 2012/2013 in honour of Irom Sharmila Chanus 39 years.[26] These two reports are about Indian modern artists in a typically Indian bureaucratic attack on Indian bureaucracy[27,28] Unfortunately neither media report carries any images of the artwork. This latter sums up the recent interest in Sharmila from mainland India. It started as a Facebook social with dozens of Facebook pages taking up the name of Irom Sharmila Chanu and then fading away. Six months ago visitors to this page were lucky to make double figures, in September, it had risen to thousands. Now it has settled back to hundreds. It took an adrenaline rush from Anna Hazares mercurial success in the late summer also. These campaigns in the long run may weaken the Indian Armys resolve to maintain its low impact civil war on the buffer states. But often campaigns like these marches art attacks are blowing off steam so that the middle classes can feel they have done their duty and may return to their real lives. What remains is for the Manipuri people to assert their democratic rights and remove AF(SP)A from Manipur by denotifying Disturbed Area Status come the next elections or not. 3. International attention Sharmila was nominated to the 2005 Nobel Peace Prize by a
32

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

Guwahati-based womans organization, the North East Network.[29] She was awarded the 2007 Gwangju Prize for Human Rights, which is given for an outstanding person or group, active in the promotion and advocacy of Peace, Democracy and Human Rights.[30] She shared the award with Lenin Raghuvanshi of Peoples Vigilance Committee on Human Rights, a northeastern Indian human rights organization. In Addition the largest monetary prize the first Rabindranath Tagore Peace Prize was given to her in 2010 by the New Delhi IIPM.[31] She was awarded the Sarva Gunah Sampannah Award for Peace and Harmony[32] aka the 12th Signature Women of Substance award (Assam) also in 2010.[33] 2009 she was awarded the first Mayillama Award (Kerala).[34] And in 2010 in the presence of the Law Minister Sri V Moilly in Bangalore she was awarded in absentia a lifetime achievement award.[35] She was most recently awarded an Adivasi Ratna award accepted by her brother.[36] She has some support in Europe and a request for letters to be sent to her within Manipur. The letters were presented to her in the form of a printed personalized slam book titled Echel for Eche a Pan Manipur initiative on 11 October 2011. An effective end to the satyagraha can come next year if Manipuris convert their symbolic and moral support to votes for MLAs who pledge to lift the disturbed area status from the whole of Manipur. In Turkey 811 December 2010 The Which Human Rights Festival organized by the Turkish Human Rights Group the Documentarist was dedicated to Irom Sharmila.[37] The controversial BJP politician Varun Gandhi recently used an internet tweet to announce his support of her[38] She has written a lot of poetry most recently a 12 poem bilingual anthology (Meiteilol and English), Fragrance of Peace (Nungsigi Leinam), was released by Zubaan books to coincide with the tenth year of her detention,[39] with profits used to support her cause. This appears to have been a project first

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

33

suggested by Norwegian designer Mr Lars Muller, who was appointed in December 2007 by the World Organization against Torture OMCT as her Defending the Defenders sponsor.[40,41] The JPF have appealed to the current SAARC conference[42] in the Maldives on behalf of Sharmila while its founder presented at the Peoples SAARC in Kerala.[43] 4. Works on her life Deepti Priya Mehrotras Burning Bright: Irom Sharmila and the Struggle for Peace in Manipur details Sharmilas life and the political background of her fast.[44] Kavita Joshis short documentary My Body My Weapon (released by Why Democracy? in 2007) alleges violations by security forces that fuel Sharmilas resolve to keep fasting until AFSPA is repealed.[45] Tales from the Margins, a twin project of the above film, also focuses on Sharmila, locating her resistance in the larger context of womens protests against the AFSPA in Manipur. Ojas S V, a theatre artist from Pune has been performing a mono-play titled Le Mashale (Take the torch), based on Irom Sharmilas life and struggle at several places in India. It is an adaptation of Meira Paibi (Women bearing torches), a drama written by Malayalam playwright Civic Chandran.[46,47] Recently Save Sharmila Campaign, SaveSharmila.org, has been launched by a joint network of civil societies. They all are raising voice for Irom Sharmila. Save Sharmila Campaign has organised a candle light solidarity prayer[48] on 25th JUNE 2011 at Rajghat New Delhi. Approximately 200 people participated in it from all walks of life. On August 21, 2011, Indian author and activist Arundhati Roy, in her The Hindu editorial on Anna Hazare, contrasted Annas media-publicized fast with the decade-long fast of Irom, including the motivations for both.[49] Save Sharmila Campaign organised documentary screening and panel discussion in various colleges of Delhi with support of its student coordinators and volunteers. Screening and discussion already organised in September month in South Asian
34

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

University, Delhi College of Arts & Commerce. The Save Sharmila Campaign has already got support from various eminent social activists. 5. References 1 ^ Rituparna Chatterjee (20 April 2011). Spot the Difference: Hazare vs. Irom Sharmila. Sinlung. Retrieved 30 April 2011. ^ Manipur Fasting Woman Re-arrested. BBC News. 9 March 2009. Retrieved 8 May 2011. ^ a b Andrew Buncombe (4 November 2010). A decade of starvation for Irom Sharmila. London: The Independent. Retrieved 8 May 2011. ^ . http://kanglaonline.com/2011/12/a-message-from-iromsharmila-chanu/. ^ a b c d Nilanjana S. Roy (8 February 2011). Torchbearers for Victims in a Violent Land. New York Times. Retrieved 8 May 2011. ^ a b Rahul Pathak (6 August 2004). Why Malom is a big reason for Manipur anger against Army Act. IndianExpress.com. Retrieved 8 May 2011. ^ Malom Massacre ^ a b c d e Shoma Chaudhury (5 December 2009). Irom And The Iron In Indias Soul. Tehelka. Retrieved 8 May 2011. ^ a b c Manipur fasting woman re-arrested. BBC News. 9 March 2009. Retrieved 8 May 2011.

2 3

4 5

7 8

10 ^ Section 309 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 11 ^ [1] 12 ^ Subramaniam, Vidya (28 August 2011). Irom Sharmila urges Anna to visit Manipur. The Hindu (Chennai, India). 13 ^ http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/highlights-of-annahazare-s-interview-to-ndtv-133365

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

35

14 ^ Mamatas help sought for raising voice against AFSPA. The Times Of India. 15 ^ http://kanglaonline.com/2011/09/cpi-ml-to-showsolidarity-to-sharmila-with-nationwide-agitation/ 16 ^ PM should realize I am struggling for people: Irom. The Times Of India. 17 ^ Civil society groups in state back Iroms cause. The Times Of India. 18 ^ http://www.cathnewsindia.com/2011/11/09/nccidemands-repeal-of-draconian-law/ 19 ^ http://www.cathnewsindia.com/2011/09/07/christiansback-hunger-striker-campaign/ 20 ^ http://e-pao.net epSubPage Extractor.asp? src=news_section.Press_Release. Press_Release_2011.11_ years_of_Fasting_the_plea_unheard_the_struggle_uncovered_Justice_at_Crossroads_20111102 21 ^ http://e-pao.net/GP.asp?src=5..191111.nov11 22 ^ http://e-pao.net/GP.asp?src=3..061211.dec11 23 ^ http://e-pao.net/GP.asp?src=2..091211.dec11 24 ^ http://e-pao.net/GP.asp?src=26..091211.dec11 25 ^ http://e-pao.net/GP.asp?src=24..241111.nov11 26 ^ http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/guwahati/ Scholarship-for-Manipuri-girl-students-in-Sharmilas-honour/ articleshow/11053460.cms 27 ^ http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/the-force-of-art/ 886614/ 28 ^ http://www.mumbaimirror.com/article/3/ 2011121120111211130008924a506ecfb/%E2%80%98Worldlooks-up-to-her-not-our-govt%E2%80%99.html 29 ^ Irom Sharmila: A potent revolutionary fights the unacceptable. headlinesindia.com. 6 March 2011. Retrieved 8 May 2011.
36

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

30 ^ a b Gwangju Prize for Human Rights. May 18 Memorial Foundation. Retrieved 24 April 2011. 31 ^ Irom Sharmila awarded Rabindranath Tagore peace award - India - DNA 32 ^ [2] 33 ^ The Sentinel 34 ^ The Assam Tribune Online 35 ^ INDIA: Human rights defender awarded for lifetime achievement Asian Human Rights Commission 36 ^ Irom Chanu Sharmila Gets Adivasi Ratna Award manipurhub.com 37 ^ [3] 38 ^ [4] 39 ^ Zubaan Books: Books 40 ^ [5] 41 ^ Actions realised within the framework of the sponsorship project. In the OMCT website third paragraph for actions realized within 2009 it states that the project of publication of 12 poems through the collaboration of her Norwegian sponsor Mr Lars Muller could not be realized due to problems with the Indian Partner. World Organization against Torture OMCT. Retrieved 27 August 2011. 42 ^ http://ifp.co.in/imphal-free-press-fullstory.php?newsid=2839&catid=1 43 ^ http://expressbuzz.com/cities/thiruvananthapuram/socialgroups-come-together-for-people%E2%80%99s-saarc/ 331470.html. 44 ^ Penguin Review, Burning Bright 45 ^ Iron Lady Of Manipur- The Worlds Longest Hunger Striker 46 ^ The Hindu, For a Noble cause

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice

37

47 ^ Times of India, Single act that captures a dozen wounds of Manipur 48 ^ Civil society questions govt, why ignoring Sharmilas fast | National Alliance of Peoples Movements 49 ^ Arundhati Roy (21 August 2011). Id rather not be Anna. In regards to Annas anti-corruption activism, now known across the sub-continent as The Fast, Roy reminded readers: The Fast, of course, doesnt mean Irom Sharmilas fast that has lasted for more than ten years (shes being force fed now) against the AFSPA, which allows soldiers in Manipur to kill merely on suspicion. (Chennai, India: The Hindu). Retrieved 27 August 2011. SOURCE: based on wikipedia entry at: http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharmila_Chanu

38

Irom Sharmilas Struggle for Justice