Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

GOD Head Notes written by Rene K.

Mueller, Copyright (c) 2005, 2006, 2007, last updated Thu, Ja nuary 15, 2009 Introduction If you don't care about the origin, the notion, the mathematics behind the GOD H eads, skip right to the 3rd page. Origin of the GOD Head Construction of a planetarium of Carl Zeiss in Jena (Germany) 1922, planned by W alther Bauersfeld GOD: from geodesy "surveying"; greek geodaisia "division of the earth"; geo "ear th, land" + daiein "divide" - so far Buckminster Fuller 's often used notion, bu t as pointed out before, Walther Bauersfeld created a "GOD" Head in 1922 for Car l Zeiss in Jena (Germany), he even patented it in Germany 1925 (Patent Nr. 41539 5) as seen in this page , so well over 20 years before B. Fuller was developing the "GOD" approach. The term "GOD" is a mathematical term, which was adapted by Fuller to describe h is approach, the term otherwise literally means "shortest path of two points on a sphere or curved space". It seems Fuller simply wasn't aware of Bauersfeld prior work at Carl Zeiss, and reinvented and popularized it then in his life (1895 - 1983) and beyond via the Buckminster Fuller Institute these days. US Pavilion at the Expo 1967 in Montreal (Canada) by Buckminster Fuller & Shoji Sadao I discovered the GOD Head first through web-site by Tara Landry and her Head calculator. The first version of my notes used the strut or chord f actors she extracted from books by Hugh Kenner (GOD Math & How To Use It) and Ll oyd Khan (Headbook I & II), who themselves relied on Fuller's work. As a result of my study on GOD polyhedra I wrote my own software tools to calcul ate, adjust and render 3D solids, such as platonic, archimedean and johnson soli ds, also generally known as regular and semi-regular polyhedra. Based on that study of the manifold solids and their GOD derivates I rewrote my "GOD Heads Notes" entirely with more variants (not just Icosahedron based Heads) including dedicated calculators for each variant, optimization of cutting respe ctive struts and a 2D construction map. And as the time goes by I will add more comments on each featured Head variant. Geodesize: Triangulate & Normalize Icosahedron Icosahedron 2? (pre-normalized) Icosahedron 2? Triangulate Methods The procedure I feature as "geodesize" is to triangulate a triangle, or a polygo

n previously triangulated, and then normalize so the vector length is 1, this is also called spherized or spherical projected, as the point is forced to lie on the surface of a sphere. To triangulate a triangle there are different methods or classes available, most prominent are the class 1 or alternate, and class 2 or triacon; additionally se veral "methods" are distincted - read for more at the References, in particular Joseph D. Clinton's work for NASA. Of course you can also subdivide into other than triangles, such as other polygo nal forms. I focus as a first step on the triangulation and its "class 1" or "al ternate" way. Procedure & Evolution of a Subdividing Triangle I have summarized several procedures incl. ones I discovered (some may have been used by others previously, I'm personally just not aware of it): The nV Notion Buckminster Fuller introduced the notion of n? often also written as nV (V like in "vision", whereas ? is the greek letter "nu"), it means the amount of divisio n of an original triangle. In this case the class 1 or alternate method is used, and from the original triangle. Formulas: nt = n2 Example: 5V or 5? has 52 triangles per original triangle The Ln Notion More in an accident I "geodesized" an already geodesized solid, because the prog ram I wrote could not make subdivisions other than 2 at first, so in order to cr eate 4V I thought to pipe it into the same program twice - and as a surprise the strut lengths varied from the 4V notion - I also came up with 5 strut lengths a nd not 6 as common for the 4V. I realized then, the triangles were more even, smaller variance of strut lengths . In order to distinct this method from the nV notion I called it Level 1 or L1 and then L2. In order to make it more aligned with the nV notion: 1V and L1 are the same, 2V and L2 are also the same, but 4V and L3 differ then. Formulas: nt = (2(n-1))2 = 22(n-1) Example: L5 = (25-1)2 = 22(5-1) = 256 triangles per triangle The Concated V Notion While I discovered a geodesized geodesize solid (like L3) provides different str ut lengths and variance than a comperable, in sense of amount of subdivisions nV variant, I extended that it wouldn't necessary be the 2V to derive others, so I introduce the n0V.n1V . . . notion, concate the procedure of geodesize with '.' together.

2V.2V ~ 4V 3V.2V ~ 6V 2V.2V.2V ~ 8V Formulas: nt = n02 * n12 * n22 ... Example: 2V.3V.2V ~ 12V = 22 * 32 * 22 = 144 triangles per original triangle The Concated V vs Ln Notion Just for sake of completeness: L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 = = = = = 1V = 1V.1V 2V = 2V1 = L1.2V 2V.2V = 2V2 = L2.2V 2V.2V.2V = 2V3 = L3.2V 2V.2V.2V.2V = 2V4 = L4.2V

and also: 2V.2V != 3V.2V.2V L3 != 4V L4 != 8V 4V but ~ 4V != 12V but ~ 12V but ~ 4V but ~ 8V

Notions: '=' is equal, '!=' is not equal and '~' stands for similar Normalizing In order to normalize, we need to determine the distance of each vertice (x,y,z) from the center or an origin (xorigin,yorigin,zorigin): d = v(x2 + y2 + z2) or more general d = v((x - xorigin)2 + (y - yorigin)2 + (z - zorigin)2) To normalize we divide each of x, y and z by the distance: x = x / d y = y / d z = z / d or more general x = (x - xorigin) / d + xorigin y = (y - yorigin) / d + yorigin z = (z - zorigin) / d + zorigin which adjusts the point to have distance of 1 to the center - a sphere is a form where all points of the surface have the same distance to its center; so by nor malizing the point is spherized or spherical projected. There is far more math to cover in GOD approaches, but for now I leave it at thi s and may extend it later more. A bit more math comes when calculating details o

f the required struts to compose a Head, this follows on the next page then. References NASA Contractor Report: Advanced Structural Geometry Studies, Part I: Polyhe dral Subdivision Concepts for Structural Applications by Joseph D. Clinton (1971 ) GOD Math by Joseph D. Clinton, rewrite by Jay Salsburg Structural Design Concepts for Future Space Missions or "GOD Design Concepts " for NASA in 1968, by various authors incl. B. Fuller, rewrite by Jay Salsburg Mother Earth News: Where Heads Come From (1971)