Managing People & Performance

Individual Assignment

Page 1 of 3

This is an individual coursework weighted at 50% for the Managing People & Performance Module. Objective of the Project: Students must demonstrate their ability to: Demonstrate a systematic understanding and critical evaluation of key aspects of employee reward strategy used in managing the performance of the organisation. Demonstrate the ability to compare and appraise different business theories and perspectives of employee reward and performance. Analyse, critically evaluate and communicate information & concepts of varying degrees of complexity as applied to managing reward and employee appraisal.

Below are the alternative topics for the Individual Assignment: 1. Using practical examples, critically evaluate how the increase of women in the workplace has influenced the provision of rewards and benefits in contemporary organisations. 2. Critically discuss the extent to which the emergence of performance management system has become a strategy to managing employee contribution for organizational effectiveness. 3. Critically examine the needs of the younger workforce and analyse how rewards strategies could drive better performance outcomes from Generation Y employees for organisations. Requirements: 1) You are required to interpret the chosen statement and answer the question with analysis of more than two cases/examples of company rewards strategies or performance management systems(depending on the question selected). 2) Your analysis must highlight the practices and explore implications of these practices. 3) You must develop suggestions or provide recommendations based on the analysis given.
Level 3 Asia Pacific University College of Information & Innovation

Managing People & Performance

Individual Assignment

Page 2 of 3

Project Deliverables: You are required to choose any ONE of the above topics. Thorough and well referenced research must be carried out for the assignment. An appropriate report structure is required. (Introduction, body and conclusion) Format: Using font size 12, Times New Roman for writing style, spacing of 1.5. Word count should not exceed more than 2,200. You are required to demonstrate good comprehension of the module and exercise analytical skills in completing the assignment. Other Remarks Individuals are required to consult with the lecturer regularly to ensure the proper development of the project deliverables. Marking Scheme Students are expected to include the following in the assignment: Introduction and Interpretation Main issues/practices identified with supporting research Implications of practices (application of concepts) Suggestions Conclusion Overall quality, depth and critical evaluation TOTAL Performance Expectation Marks are awarded based on the following guidelines: Grade 80% 100% Description of performance level Good interpretation of question and a comprehensive analysis given. Evidence of superior knowledge of module content with clear and convincing application of concepts. Well illustrated with practical examples addressing
Asia Pacific University College of Information & Innovation

10% 20% 25% 15% 10% 20% 100%

Level 3

Managing People & Performance

Individual Assignment

Page 3 of 3

relevant issues with commendable critical appraisal. Citations must be from between 8 to 10 solid references and interesting arguments are presented based on selected reference sources. Arguments are coherent and convincing in implications, based on reflective reading. Points are supported with valid explanation and good reasoning through a well organized manner and well connected throughout. Shows critical analysis, understanding, thought and reflection of subject matter. 60% 79% Sufficient points are raised and valid explanations are provided based on accurate identification of issues. Arguments presented are adequate, based on selected text and relevant areas demonstrating knowledge of module content. Implications are relevant but with minor misapprehensions. Citations is from between 5 to 8 solid references. There is sufficient critical analysis of problem and possible solutions, reflecting understanding of subject matter but some areas lacking in depth. Basic requirements fulfilled, reflecting some understanding of issues and possible solutions. Application of concepts is broadly understood. Recommendations given are based on selected texts. Basic examples are used to illustrate points. Arguments given are elementary/ general and explanations may either be unclear or unhelpful in clarifying points. Assignment quality was reduced either in depth and scope of implications or suggestions or both. Citations is between 3 to 5 reference sources. Assignment not arranged in a structured manner. Sentences and reasoning may have flaws in clarity and meaning. No understanding of the subject matter and failure to address the needs of the question. Points are off-topic and are not related to selected text or required areas. Issues not addressed and not connected to implications or suggestions. No understanding of theories and concepts taught. Weak or no referencing of sources. Argument is sometimes trivial, confused or flawed.

50% 59%

Below 50%

Level 3

Asia Pacific University College of Information & Innovation