A PROJECT REPORT ON EVALUATION OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS IN NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED AT RAJASTHAN ATOMIC POWER STATION

A Comparative Study by
Narendra Kumar Sharma MBA, Enrollment No.510811352 Study Center : Kota(01691,Rajasthan Project Supervisor Shri M.N.Verma Manager(HR) RR Site, Rawatbhata

Page 1 of 86

TITLE

: Evaluation of Disciplinary proceedings in NPCILA Comparative Study

PRESENTED TO : The Director/ Coordinator(Projects) Sikkim Manipal University DATE OF SUBMISSION PURPOSE : : To fulfill the requirements for the project report in the curriculum of MBA : Narendra Kumar Sharma : Shri M.N.Verma Manager(HRM), Rajasthan Atomic Power Station Rawatbhata Rajasthan Site, PO: Anushakti, Via: Kota, Rajasthan-323305

WRITTEN BY UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF

Page 2 of 86

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
It is a matter of great pleasure that SIKKIM MANIPAL UNIVERSITY has provided an opportunity to those executive who do not have professional qualifications but are keen to acquire simultaneously with their jobs. While making use of this opportunity, I have been given an opportunity to prepare a Project report as part of fulfillment of MBA(HRM) curriculum. My sincere thanks are due to those concerned personnel who have conveyed the approval of synopsis with guide to do the Project work. My deep gratitude are due to the people of my organization, people of my other units located in other part of the country who have helped directly and indirectly in completing this project report. My high obligation and sincere thanks is for the Management of Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited who have been kind enough to sponsor for this Management Programme. I also place on record my sincere thanks for Shri M.N.Verma, Manager(HRM) who, inspire of his high busy schedule, provided me not only guidance but motivation also for completion of this project. I would be failing in my duties if I forgot to express gratitude to my wife who has always motivated me for early completion of the assignment & this Project Report Similarly, I dedicate this project Report to my Parents and other family members whose blessings had always been with me. I am also extremely thankful to my section In-Charge Shri Mahavir Sharma, Deputy Manager (HRM), Shri O.P.Baghel, Deputy Manager (HR) & colleagues Shri K.K.Anand, Assistant Grade-2, Shri Prakash Vidhani, Assistant Grade-2 for rendering their assistance at various stages to make this project report more attractive and effective and in the present form of presentation. (Narendra Kumar Sharma)
Page 3 of 86

Authentication Certificate

This is certified that the Project report entitled "Employee Job Satisfaction at NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED. This Project has been completed under the able guidance and supervision of Shri Rajeev Dudhe, Sr. Manager (HR) of Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited, Rawatbhata Rajasthan Site, PO: Anushakti, Via: Kota, Rajasthan-323 303 and also with the requisite assistance from other Managers of Rawatbhata Rajasthan Site. It is further certificated that this report was not submitted earlier either to Sikkim Manipal University or to any other institution for said purpose.

(Rinkey Lata) Reg. No. 520951978 (Study Centre Code-1691)

Sikkim Manipal University, Kota (Raj.)

Countersigned by:

(Rajeev Dudhe) Sr. Manager (HR), Rajesthan Atomic Power Station Rawatbhata Rajasthan Site PO: Anushakti,Via: Kota, Rajasthan-323305

Page 4 of 86

As part of fulfillment of Master of Business Administration in (HRM) from Sikkim Manipal University, a Project was required to be prepared. For this purpose, being an executive of Personnel and Industrial Relations and having continuous experience of handling disciplinary cases for more than 5 years, it came to my mind to choose this topic for the project. With this decision, I will be killing two birds with one stone-firstly comparative study will eliminate negative aspects while dealing with disciplinary cases and secondly, my requirement of submission of Project Report will also be fulfilled. In my first chapter i.e. Brief description of the organization, I have indicated as to why I chose this topic or what is base for writing this Project report. Apart from this, a separate chapter entitled" comparison" has been included which will be facilitating in finding out the difference between three sets of rules applicable in a single organization. I have made efforts to include very important aspects of any domestic inquiry Principle of natural justice which many times make the whole inquiry process null and void, Cunning charged employees go on pulling the inquiries undue long. To prevent this, a separate chapter entitled" Avoiding delays and dilatory tactics" has been written. Besides, roles of Inquiry Officers, Presenting Officers and Disciplinary Authorities which are not available any where as a collection, has also been compiled with experience. I am sure, this project report will be useful for the executives of NPCIL who are dealing with disciplinary cases.

SYNOPSIS
Page 5 of 86

EVALUATION OD DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS IN NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED-A COMPARATIVE STUDY. 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE ORGANIZATION / PROJECT.

Brief description of the Organization i.e. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited. Description of the sample unit, i.e. Rajasthan Atomic Power Station and Project. 2. RATIONALE:

As a model employer, organization has to observe all the laws of the land in dealing with employees, right from their recruitment to their retirement. The employee, particularly public servants, including employees of NPCIL are a special type quite distinct from the employees in private sector, being charged with a special type of responsibility to man the Nuclear Power Stations at construction and operation stage to avoid any kind of disaster. The NPCIL is bound by severe restraints in handling its employees and is mainly guided by the Construction of India in such matters. It has to dispense justice and fair play and avoid discrimination. At the smae time, NPCIL, in its obligation to the progress and development of the nation by producing Nuclear Energy, has to ensure that the employees behave themselves, enforce discipline and promote loyalty for the sake of smooth conduct of business of NPCIL, prevent corrupt practices and punish errant employees through appropriate disciplinary measures. To crystal clarify the roles of Inquiry Officers, Presenting Officers and Defiance Assistants in delivering justice to accused employees. To recommended as to whether institution of disciplinary proceedings can be avoided with any other kind of similar actions. 3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Page 6 of 86

The research methodology will be partly of "exploratory research". it will be based on the experience of the undersigned gained in four different units i.e. Kakrapar Atomic Power Station, Rajasthan Atomic Power Station-3&4, Narora Atomic Power Station and Rajasthan Atomic Power Project-5&6. In addition to above, so called experts in these areas available in different units of NPCIL will be consulted. Heads of HR 's who are generally disciplinary authority for majority of employees and are also responsible for systematic conduct of inquiry shall be consulted. The following will be the source of data: PRIMARY DATA: - Discussion and consultation with the concerned dealing officers in various NPCIL units who are dealing with Disciplinary matters. - Interaction with some of Disciplinary Authorities and Appellate Authorities. SECONDARY DATA: Monthly return on disciplinary cases sent to corporate office. CCS(CCA) Rules-1965 as model. Other official records, annual reports etc. Study of Procedure of other units of NPCIL to compare with the Rajasthan Atomic Power Station.

4. SAMPLING: Rajasthan Atomic power Station, which has 4 units under operation and two units under construction and is popularly known as Nuclear City, being the biggest Nuclear Power Plant, will be used as a sample units. Other units of NPCIL located at Narora in Bulandshahar district, Kakrapar in Surat district, Tarapur in Thane district, Kalpakkam in Kanchipuram district, Kaiga in Uttar Kannada district and Kudankulam in Tirunalvelli district will be treated as its elements.
Page 7 of 86

5. LIMITATIONS: Though the study is limited to Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited where NPCIL Discipline & Appeal Rules-1996 is applicable in respect of NPCIL Officers and Certified Standing Orders (wherever Certified)/Model Standing orders are applicable, it will be useful to other Government organizations also, as part of NPCIL employees who are on permanent deputation form Department of Atomic Energy are also governed by CCS(CCA)Rules-1965. 6. EXPECTED CONTRIBUTION FROM THE STUDY: The outcome of the proposed comparative study and project work will be able to ascertain any problematic key areas due to which right rules may be applied to right class of employees, whether disciplinary actions should be used as reinforcement strategy or not in NPCIL or if it is to be used at all , where should it be used. It is also expected to bring uniformity in all the units of NPCIL as far as application of different rules on disciplinary proceedings are concerned. Study also expects to clarify the role of IAs,POs, and DAs in discharging their duties in doing the justice to the accused. Elimination of disciplinary actions to the bare minimum will boost the morale of employees and motivate the functions of NPCIL employees. Thus the development of the nation will bring peace and prosperity be high level of Nuclear Energy Generation. (Narendra Kumar Sharma) Roll No.510811352 (M.N.Verma) Manager(HR),Project Guide

CONTENTS
Chapter No. Description
Page 8 of 86

Page No.

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11

Brief Description of the organization Classification of posts under different Rules Misconducts Comparison Penalties Principles of Natural Justice Avoiding Delays & Dilatory Tactics Roles of various authorities Research Methodology Recommendations Abbreviations & Bibliography

11 17 17A 21 22 26 27 38 39 44 45 53 54 62 63 73 74 76 77 83 84 86

Page 9 of 86

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ORGANIZATION

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ORGANIZATION INTRODUCTION ABOUT THE ENTIRE ORGANIZATION

In its planned programme for steady economic development and improvement of living standard of its people, India paid attention among other resources in harnessing energy from ATOM, the newest and potentially and most revolutionary source of energy in modern times. The Atomic Energy programme started in the year 1944, when Dr. Homi Jehangir Bhabha proposed for Nuclear Research in India. Soon after
Page 10 of 86

independence, an Atomic Energy Act was passed in April 1948 with the object of development of atomic energy for peaceful purposes. As per the terms of this Act, an Atomic Energy Commission was set up in August 1948 by the Govt. of India. The commission was to protect the interests of the country in connection with the Nuclear Energy, searching and extracting of minerals and to make research and development related to Nuclear energy. To carry out these functions, Department of Atomic Energy was established on 03.08.1954 with followings aims:

i.

Administration of Atomic Energy Act including control of radio active substances and regulation of their possessions, use, disposals and transportation.

ii. iii. iv. v.

Research Atomic Energy and its use in Agriculture, Biology industries and medicines Generation of electricity through use of Atomic Energy. Design, construction and operation of research, developments and power reactors. Supervision of Heavy Water Boards and other institutions like IRE-Indian Rare Earth Limited, ECIL-Electronics Corporation of India Limited, UCIL-Uranium Corporation of India Limited, SINP- Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics etc.

Page 11 of 86

Department of Atomic Energy is a very vast department as can be seen from Annexure-II. To facilitate DAE in achieving its aims more effectively and also with an intention of raising funds from the Capital market required for the programme Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) was formed an registered under the Companys Act 1956 on 17th September, 1987 with an authorized share capital of Rs. 2000/- crores. Thus, now Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited is a public sector enterprise of Central Government under the administrative control of Department of Atomic Energy with an objective of Generation of Electricity through the use of nuclear energy by designing, constructing and operating reactors and other Peaceful and constructive use of atomic energy in the field of agriculture, medicines etc. NPCIL had its registered office at New Delhi but it has been changed now to Mumbai with its Head Office in Mumbai. All the nuclear power projects and stations under the control of DAE have been transferred to NPCIL Units after formation. The different units of NPCIL with its capacity are as under:

Sl. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Station with locations Tarapur Atomic Power Station-1&2, Distt. Thane, Maharashtra Tarapur Atomic Power Station-3&4, Distt. Thane, Maharashtra Rajasthan Atomic Power Station1&2, Distt. Chittorgarh, Rajasthan Madras Atomic Power Station, Distt. Chingleput, Tamilnadu Narora Atomic Power Station, Distt. Bulandshahar, Uttar Pradesh Kakarapar Atomic Power Station, Distt. Surat, Gujrat Kaiga Generating Station 1&2, Distt.
Page 12 of 86

No. of Capacity Reactors Reactor- ReactorI II TWO 160 160 MWe MWe TWO 540 540 MWe MWe TWO 100 200 MWe MWe TWO 170 220 MWe MWe TWO 220 220 MWe MWe TWO 220 220 MWe MWe TWO 220 220

8 9

Uttar Kannada, Karnataka Kaiga Generating Project 3&4, Distt. Uttar Kannada, Karnataka Rajasthan Atomic Power Station3&4, Distt. Chittorgarh, Rajasthan

TWO TWO

MWe 220 MWe 200 MWe

MWe 220 MWe 220 MWe

UNITS UNDER CONSTRUCTION

Sl. No. Station with locations Rajasthan Atomic Power Project5&6, Distt. Chittorgarh, Rajasthan Kudankulam Atomic Power Project, Distt. Nagarcoil, Tamilnadu No. of Capacity Reactors Reactor- ReactorI II TWO 200 220 MWe MWe TWO 1000 1000 MWe MWe

ABOUT THE UNIT CONCERNED FOR THE PROJECT REPORT

Rajasthan Atomic Power Station which is the first unit of Department of Atomic Energy is today very popular not only on the map of Rajasthan but on the map of India as biggest Nuclear Centre of the world and popularly known as Anu Nagari. It is situated about 50 Kms from Kota City which is very popular for Kota Stone and is actually in the Chittorgarh district of Rajasthan State. The Station has 4 units running and two more units of 220 MWe are at the advanced stage of construction and it is expected that these twin units under construction will start generating electricity very shortly. The total man power the

Page 13 of 86

station is about 2800 comprises Scientists, supervisors, technicians, Manager and administrative assistants. The station has got multi residential colonies well maintained, and horticulture. The diversified activities of this station have recently been unified and functions which were common in nature have been integrated and switched over under the one umbrella. Personnel functions, Finance related functions and materials procurement activities have been integrated along with the common of facilities. It is really a unique station in many matters compared to other units of the NPCIL.

ABOUT THE BASE FOR THIS PROJECT REPORT

Before 17th September, 1987, this was under the direct control of Department of Atomic Energy and under the label of Government of India. The employees were governed by rules and regulations, which were applicable to the employees of Central Government i.e. under the Central Civil Services (CCS). As far as rules relating to conduct and disciplines were concerned, Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules-1964 and Central Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeals) Rules 1965 were applicable to discipline the employees from misconduct etc. on formation of the Corporation, it was decided that till Corporation frames its own rules, only Govt. rules shall be followed.

Page 14 of 86

At a later date, NPCIL Board, in its 46th meeting held on 28th December, 1994 approved NPCIL (Conduct) Rules-1994. Corporate Office of the Corporation vide their letter No. NPC/CO/231/PER/95/89 dated March 1, 1995 notified. NPCIL (Conduct) Rules-1994, subsequently, a resolution was also passed by NPCIL Board at its 77th meeting held on 27.09.2000 approving NPCIL (Conduct) Rules-1994. Notification of mere NPCIL (Conduct) Rules was not sufficient, but a rule that is commensurate to Central Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeals) Rules 1965 was also to be notified by the NPCIL so that full-fledged NPCIL discipline rules are implemented in the Corporation to discipline its employees. Finally, NPCIL (DISCIPLINE & APPEAL) RULES- 1996 was formulated with resolution by NPCIL Board in its 54th meeting held on 5th September, 1996. In a resolution by Board in its 84 th meeting held on 28th November, 2001 approved amendments to the NPCIL (Discipline & Appeal) Rules 1996.

But the unfortunate thing even after notification of these Conduct and Discipline & Appeal Rules was that these rules were applicable to the officers only of the Corporation. There were no rules to regulate and discipline the workers of the Corporation which were in good numbers. However, subsequently, it was decided that workers will be governed by the Certified Standing orders of the respective units and process to certify the Standing orders from various units were initiated by the Corporation. Almost all units started the process of certification of standing orders but due to Industrial dispute filed by the units, the work of certification is still not completed except KAPS where there was some problem in the union office bearers and they did not respond to the notices issued by the Regional Labour Commission (Central) Ahmedabad nor they could register any

Page 15 of 86

protest and after a long waiting period, the RLC (Central), Ahmedabad certified the standing orders for KAPS. The above being the situation, categories of the employees widened with reference to Conduct Rules and Appeal Rules. Different kind of employees were to be regulated by different sets of the rules
Sl. No. 1 2 Category of employee Conduct Rules Appeal Rules

Employee not absorbed CCS (Conduct) Rules- CCS (CCA) Rules-1965 in NPCIL 1964 Employees opting to CCS (Conduct) Rules- CCS (CCA) Rules-1965 join NPCIL on 1964 industrial The Standing (Employment industrial Standing & permanent deputation Workmen absorbed in The NPCIL and recruited in (Employment

NPCIL Orders) Act-1946 Orders) Act-1946 Officers absorbed in NPCIL (Conduct) Rules- NPCIL (Discipline NPCIL and recruited in 1994 NPCIL Appeal) Rules-1996

Due to application of variety of Rules to different sets of employees, it had become quite difficult to apply relevant rules on concerned employees by the various units. As I have experience of four different units and particularly dealing with this delicate subject, I was surprised to note that different units have been applying wrong rules to the employees for initiating disciplinary action. Due to this, following serious lapses on the part of employer were noticed. Application of wrong rules prevailed Employees who were illiterate or less educated and not having the knowledge of disciplinary proceedings were booked and punished by the different rules Impartiality in the application of rules germinated There remained threat of challenge for irrelevant application of rules
Page 16 of 86

 Some of the sharp and cunning employees managed to quash the action of the Management on the notion of wrong application of rules Some employees who were imposed penalties of major nature like, dismissal and removal or withholding of increments adversely affecting the career opportunity approached Court of Law and action of management were set aside though action and procedures of the management were perfectly alright except application of relevant rules Sometimes, employees were awarded punishments not commensurate to the gravity of offence. These are some of the points which made me to think and analyse disciplinary proceedings being initiated in Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited with a view to bring uniformity in application of rules and also to brig out some suggestive points for the benefit of the Presenting Officers, Inquiry Officers and Disciplinary Authorities. Hence, this project report

CLASSIFICATION OF POSTS
Classification according to CCS (CCA) Rules 1965 :Sl. Description of Post No. 1 A central civil post carrying a pay or scale of pay 2 with a maximum of not less than Rs. 13,500/A central civil post carrying a pay or scale of pay with a maximum of not less than Rs. 9,000/- but less 3 than Rs. 13,500/A central civil post carrying a pay or scale of pay with a maximum of not less than Rs. 4,000/- but less 4 than Rs. 9,000/A central civil post carrying a pay or scale of pay with a maximum of which is Rs. 4,000/- or less Group D Group C Classification of Posts Group A Group B

Classification according to NPCIL (Discipline & Appeal) Rules 1996

Page 17 of 86

The post under the Corporation other than those held by persons to who these rules do not apply, shall be a general or special order of the board be classified as below :GROUP A GROUP B GROUP C All posts in NPCIL shall be classified as follows(Pre-revised) :Sl. Description of Post No. 1 Post carrying a pay or scale of pay with a maximum 2 3 of not less than Rs. 13,500/Post carrying a pay or scale of pay with a maximum of not less than Rs. 9,000/- but less than Rs. 13,500/Post carrying a pay or scale of pay with a maximum Classification of Posts Group A Group B Group C

of not less than Rs. 4,000/- but less than Rs. 9,000/Classification of workmen according to the Industrial Employment (Standing

Orders) Central Rules, 1946. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Permanent Workman Probationers Badlis Temporary Casual Apprentices

From the above classification we can see that according to Central Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeals) Rules 1965, there have been 4 groups i.e. Group A, B, C & D. However, NPCIL (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1965 which has been formed on the line of CCS (CCA) Rules 1965 has classified only 3 group of employees i.e. Group A, B & C. Similarly, Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Central Rules-1946 does not provide such classification. It h as only classified workmen. The purpose of classification of such posts under CCS (CCA) Rules-1965 & NPCIL (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1996, is to ensure and decide as to who will be Competent Authority to
Page 18 of 86

initiate disciplinary proceedings and impose penalties for different posts, similarly, who will be prescribed Authority for giving permission for acquiring movable and immovable property for which posts. Any lapse in initiating the action and imposing the penalty by a non proper and in-Competent Authority will make the action null and void, as this will attract the provision of Article-311 of constitutional Provision article 311 of the Constitution gives two fold protection to the Civil Servants :-

b) Against dismissal or removal of a civil servant by an authority subordinate to that by which he was appointed c) Against dismissal, removal or reduction in rank without giving him an adequate opportunity of being heard in regard to the action proposed to be taken against him.

The said protection has been granted as under :a) No person who is a member of a civil service of the union or an all India service or a civil service of a state or holds a civil post under the union or a state shall be dismissed or removed be an authority subordinate to that by which he was appointed. b) No such person as foresaid shall be dismissed or removed or reduced in rank except after an inquiry in which he has been informed of the charges framed against him and given a reasonable opportunity of being heard in respect of those charges. There being the above provision, any deviation from the right application of Rules may make the whole disciplinary proceedings hull and void. In addition, in may also drag the actions to Court of Law.

Page 19 of 86

Example : - A female employee of the organization in Group C employ marred to a person who was serving in Delhi secretariat. After the marriage she was forced to stay at Delhi with her husband and remained continuously absent unauthorisedly. This was the sate of notification of new rules on disciplinary matters and nobody was sure as to under what rules the memorandum of charge sheet is to be issued and proceedings to be initiated.

The charge sheet was issued under NPCIL (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1996 which were not at all applicable to the accused employee. The said rules are applicable to the officers of NPCIL and officers who had opted to join Corporation at the enmass transfer of DAE employees to Corporation. The proceedings continued for about one year ex-parte and final decisions were about to be taken, when a letter was received from the shrewd husband of the accused employee stating that they are willing to co-operate during the inquiry if it is under the relevant rules applicable to such employees. Fortunately, disciplinary authority got changed and new disciplinary authority was thorough in the rules who immediately dropped the charges framed under wrong rules. After some time, fresh charge sheet was issued under relevant rules and matter could be concluded in accordance with the procedure. Apart from the above case, there were many other incidents where employees were imposed minor penalties under wrong rules but due to lack of knowledge neither they could protest nor it could be revised. But one thing was clear that
Page 20 of 86

they had committed the offence worth punishing and this may be the reason of the silence.

Page 21 of 86

MISCONDUCTS

MISCONDUCTS
Misconducts under different rules have been different. Let us see one by one. Since our main purpose is comparative study, we are tabulating the misconducts in the following tabular form. Misconducts under different rules:-

Under CCS (Conduct Rules)-1964

1. 2. 3. 4. The insulting and insubordination to such a degree as to be incompatible with the continuance of the relation of master and servant. Habitually negligent in respect of the duties for which he is engaged Willful insubordination or disobedience, whether alone or in combination with others, to any lawful and reasonable orders of superior Infidelity, unfaithfulness, dishonesty, untrustworthiness, theft and fraud, or dishonesty in connection with the employers business or property.

Page 22 of 86

5. of law. 6.

Strike, picketing, gherao, striking work or inciting others to strike work in contravention of the provisions of any law, or rule having the force Gross moral misconduct, acts subversive of discipline, riotous or disorderly behavior during working hours at the establishment or any act subversive of discipline.

7. 8. 9. 10. 11.

Riotous and disorderly behavior during and after the office hours or office premises. Habitual late attendance. Negligence or neglect of work or duty amounting to misconduct Habitual negligence or neglect of work Habitual absence without permission and overstaying leave Conviction by a Criminal Court.

UNDER NPCIL (CONDUCT) RULES

a) Theft, fraud or misappropriation or dishonesty in connection with the business or property of the Corporation or of property of another person within the premises of the Corporation. b) Taking or giving bribes or any illegal gratification c) Possession of pecuniary resources or property disproportionate to the known source of income by the employee or on his behalf by another person, which the employee cannot satisfactorily account for. d) Furnishing false information regarding name, age, fathers name, qualification, previous service or any other matter germane to the employment at the time of employment or during the course of employment.

Page 23 of 86

e) Acting in a manner prejudicial to the interest of the Corporation. f) Willful insubordination or disobedience, whether or not in combination with others, or any lawful and reasonable order of his superior. g) Habitual late or irregular attendance. h) Sabotage or damage to any property of the Corporation i) Interference or tampering with any safety devices installed in or about the premises of the Corporation. j) Riotous or disorderly or indecent behavior in the premises of the Corporation or outside such premises where such behavior is related to or connected with the employment. k) Gambling within the premises or the Corporation. l) Smoking within the premises of the Corporation where it is prohibited m) Collection, without the permission of the Prescribed Authority, of any money within the premises of the Corporation except as sanctioned by any law of the land for the time being in the force or rules of the Corporation.

n) Sleeping while on duty o) Commission of any act which amounts to a criminal offence involving moral turpitude. p) Absence from the employees appointed place of work without permission or sufficient cause. q) Purchasing properties, machinery, store etc. from or selling properties, machinery, stores etc. to the Corporation either directly or indirectly without seeking permission in writing from the Prescribed Authority. r) Commission of any act subversive of discipline or of good behavior including during lunch break. s) Abetment or attempt to abetment of any act which amounts to misconduct. t) Refusal to accept any communication from the official superiors.

Page 24 of 86

u) Failure to put on the uniforms/ protective clothing/ safety gears, provided by the Corporation and putting on them while not on duty. v) Failure to follow Safety Rules / Regulations / precautions laid down by the Corporation. w) Unauthorised custody and use of the Companys equipment, tools, residential premises allotted to the employee, office premises, land etc. x) Subletting or sharing of residential accommodation allotted to the employee without the approval of the Corporation y) Joint representation in matters of common interest.

UNDER INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT STANDING ORDERS ACT & MODEL STANDING ORDERS 1946 :a) Willful in subordination or dis-obedience, whether alone or in combination with others, to any lawful and reasonable order of a superior. b) Theft, fraud, or dishonesty in connection with the employers business or property. c) Willful damage to or loss of employers goods or property. d) Taking or giving bribes or any illegal gratification e) Habitual absence without leave or absence without leave for more than 10 days f) Habitual late attendance
Page 25 of 86

g) Habitual breach of any law applicable to the establishment h) Riotous or disorderly behavior during working hours at the establishment or any act subversive of discipline. i) Habitual negligence or neglect of work j) Frequent repetition of any act or omission for which a fine may be imposed to a maximum of 2 percent of the wages in a month k) Striking work or inciting others to strike work in contravention of the provisions of any law, or rule having the force of law.

Page 26 of 86

COMPARISON

The comparative study is quite essential as Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act-1946 which is applicable to industrial workers have been made compulsory to NPCIL employees in the absence of any rule in this regard. The main reason for making this Act applicable to NPCIL is that an industrial dispute has been pending for certification of standing orders for NPCIL. Following are

Page 27 of 86

the comparison which brings out the deficiency due to applicability of Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act-1946.

COMPARISON 01
Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules 1964 and NPCIL (Conduct) Rules 1994 provides that possession of pecuniary resources or property disproportionate to the known sources of income by the employee will be a grave misconduct. However, this clause is not applicable to workers in the small or other industries where wages of workers are very less, in NPCIL it is applicable to workmen on following grounds : Workmen of NPCIL are highly paid, They are earning good overtime allowance, some times equal to their wages or slightly lesser than that. Free Medical Facility More than Rs. 20,000/- incentive per annum.

These lucrative wages, and attractive perquisites attract them to acquire property beyond their reach and some times it leads to violation of the provision of disproportionate to the known source of income. However, their being no provision under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act-1946, workers are safe from action on this count. Whereas, junior officers who are not getting any

Page 28 of 86

overtime allowance are governed by the Rule. Thus there is disparity in applicability of rules and creates grouse among other class of employees

COMPARISON 2
In a major way, we can divide employees of NPCIL into following two broad categories for the purpose of conduct Rules and Discipline & Appeal Rules as under Sl. No. Officers Non-Officers 01. NPCIL (Conduct) Rules- Industrial Employment 1994 applies (Standing Order) Act-1946 applies There are following misconducts which are available under CCS (Conduct) Rules-1964 and NPCIL (Conduct) Rules 1994 but not available under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946. Furnishing false information regarding name, age, fathers name, qualification etc. Sleeping while on duty. Sub-letting or renting their residential accommodation.

Due to this, step motherly treatment is given to the employees working together, just because of their classification. Whereas, CCS (Conduct) Rules 1964 which is applicable to Govt. Employees covers all employees let it be Chief of the department or a simple helper/peon of the organization. With this, we can see that NPCIL (Conduct) Rules-1994 which is covering almost all things does not apply to the workmen of the Corporation. And, Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946 which does not cover all aspects of NPCIL or in other words
Page 29 of 86

has narrow applications, regulates the conduct and behaviour of NPCIL employees.

PROBLEM 1
We can seen that Furnishing false information regarding name, age, fathers name, qualification etc. is not a misconduct under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946. But it is of great importance in NPCIL. In case of normal industry if a workman furnishes wrong information it may not make much difference as workman has to do not much skilled job. However, in NPCIL if a 10th pass person, by furnishing wrong information gets an employment with NPCIL, he may not be able to perform the same kind of job as is required to be performed by a person of high prudence. NPCIL Projects are highly sophisticated, highly enriched in technology and computer education that where skilled persons are required, no ordinary substitute will fill the gape. There are risks of mistake by unskilled person and a person of less qualification. By any chance, if some thing wrong happens, there is no provision available to take action under this act. It is immaterial that we may take action under negligence, lack of devotion etc. thus, Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946 is not suitable for NPCIL.

PROBLEM 2 :
Sleeping while on duty is a misconduct under NPCI (Conduct) Rules but not under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946. in small industries or private industries where workmen are under the direct control and supervision of their superiors, they are not getting opportunity for this mis-conduct. However, in NPCIL the work is scattered at different locations and in round the clock shift
Page 30 of 86

in such a way that supervisor cannot reach there. Only self efficiency is the main solution. Notwithstanding the above, if worker sleeps on duty in NPCIL, there being no provision available in Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946, the worker can not be proceeded against under the right clause. It is different aspect that management may initiate action for lack of devotion to duty etc. or under clause (I) that is habitual negligence or neglect of work. But when this right clause is available under NPCIL (Conduct) Rules 1994, and at present which applies to officers only may be more suitable and authentic for the purpose.

PROBLEM 3 :
Similarly, subletting and renting accommodation is not a misconduct under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946, which is at present applicable to workmen of NPCIL employees. Whereas, NPCIL almost all employees are given departmental accommodation as this organization has beautiful residential colonies for its employees. It has been seen that in almost all units of NPCIL, Group D employees are appointed either from land affected group or local people. Generally, they have their house, agricultural land, cattle wealth and they prefer to stay in their villages only. On the otherside, they take departmental accommodation and sublet it or give this on rent to contractors who are working for NPCIL at very handsome rent.

In such a situation, only action that can be initiated against the erring workman is under the terms and conditions of allotment of accommodation. But no action can be initiated under conduct rules. For example during my posting at Narora Atomic Power Station in Bulandshahr Dist. Of Uttar Pradesh, there were about 75 local employees who had rented their accommodation to private individuals. No disciplinary action could be taken against them for their this grave misconduct. It was, for this reason, very tough to have them evicted from the
Page 31 of 86

quarters. Finding no solution, we had to take action Unauthorised occupants eviction Act and imposed recovery of market rent from these defaulters and then succeeded in getting the quarters vacated. Thus, non-coverage of this provision for NPCIL employees is an inherent lacuna which can only be fulfilled once, NPCIL gets its Standing Orders certified.

CASE STUDY
CASE NO.1 CASE : An employee of Narora Atomic Power Station who was on
permanent deputation from Department of Atomic Energy to NPCIL was charge-sheeted for refusing to carryout the
Page 32 of 86

INQUIRY

assignments given from his superiors on many occasions. : An inquiry was conducted in which the employee had not participated and the inquiry proceedings were conducted

exparte. The charges were held as proved. OUTCOME : The Inquiry Report of the employee was sent to his cadre controlling authority in Department of Atomic Energy where it was found that the inquiry report was not in the prescribed format and was sent back to I.O. for re-submission. On the second time the inquiry report submitted by I.O. was again sent back by DAE with an observation that the evidences have not been analyzed and with these corrections third time the inquiry report was submitted to DAE. In the mean time the employee was repatriated to his parent Department and penalty of dismissal was imposed upon him.

CASE NO.2 CASE : Mr. X an employee of Kakrapar Atomic Power Station was
charge-sheeted for false submission of Leave Travel Concession (LTC) claim. The charge was that he had
Page 33 of 86

traveled in lower class of accommodation by train and has claimed the LTC for higher class of accommodation. The charge-sheet was for the major penalty. : An inquiry was conducted in this regard and Inquiry Officer held the charges as proved against the employee. : Employee was awarded the penalty of dismissal from service against which he has made an appeal to the Department of Atomic Energy and his appeal was quashed. The employee has also filed as case in Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) from where the application filed by him was entertained and the action of the management was upheld by the CAT.

INQUIRY OUTCOME

CASE NO.3 CASE : Mr. X of Kakrapar Atomic Power Station was chargesheeted for visiting foreign country without previous knowledge of organization and the charge-sheet was issued under major penalty. : In this case the charged official has accepted the charges
Page 34 of 86

INQUIRY

OUTCOME

framed against him and hence no inquiry was conducted. : Based on the acceptance of the charges leveled against the charged official he was imposed major penalty of dismissal from services.

CASE NO. 4 CASE : An employee of Tarapur Atomic Power Project-3&4 was

charge-sheeted for casting aspersion on Senior Officers and blaming the father of nation for division of India. : An inquiry in this regard was conducted and the charges
Page 35 of 86

INQUIRY

OUTCOME

leveled against him were proved. : The employee was imposed penalty of dismissal from service against which he has preferred an appeal to Appellate Authority and his appeal was dismissed. The charged official was also giving an opportunity of personal hearing as requested by him. The charged official filed a case in Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) which is pending.

CASE NO. 5 CASE : Mr. X and Y of Rajasthan Atomic Power Station were
charge-sheeted for mis-appropriation of Corporation money for major penalty. They were indulged in submission of false

Page 36 of 86

medical TA claims and also fabricating the figures in PF

INQUIRY

Balance. : An inquiry was conducted against both of the employees and charges were held as proved and the employees had also accepted the charges framed against them. : Both of the employees were dismissed from service. They had filed an appeal to the Appellate Authority and the penalty of dismissal was reduced to Reduction to the lower post.

OUTCOME

CASE NO. 6 CASE : An employee of Rajasthan Atomic Power Station was

charge-sheeted for abetting his wife to commit suicide. The charge sheet was issued based on the criminal case filed against the employee and due to his detention in Police Custody. : A skeleton inquiry was conducted against the employee based on the imprisonment awarded by the Court awarding rigrous imprisonment for six years and some fine.
Page 37 of 86

INQUIRY

OUTCOME

: The charged official was awarded the penalty of dismissal.

Further, against this order he had approached Honble Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur and simultaneously he had filed a case in Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur against the decision of lower Court at Chittorgarh. Honable High Court had held that the decision of Lower Court was not correct and he was exonerated from the charges framed against him in the criminal case. Based on this decision of the employee, his appeal in the Department was considered and he has been reinstated in the service with back wages and other consequential benefits.

Page 38 of 86

PENALTIES
PENALTIES
GENERAL
Different penalties have been prescribed under the different Rules. Let us see on by one.

PENALTIES UNDER CCS (CCA) RULES 1965 :

Under Rule 11 of CCS (CCA) Rules 1965, following penalties may for good and sufficient reasons, be imposed on a Government servant :

S.N. 01.

MINOR PENALTIES Censure

S.N. MAJOR PENALTIES 01. Reduction to a lower stage for a specified period with further
Page 39 of 86

direction as to whether or not he will earn increments of pay during 02. Withholding promotion of 02. the period of such reduction. Reduction to a lower time scale of pay, grade, post or service which shall ordinarily be a bar to the promotion of the Govt. servant to the time scale of pay, grade, post or service from 03. Recovery of his pay of 03. the whole or part of any pecuniary loss caused by him by negligence or 04. breach of orders. Reduction to a lower 04. stage without effect 05. and for period 3 not years without Dismissal from service which shall ordinarily for be a disqualification future exceeding Removal from service without disqualification employment Government. for under future the which he was reduced. Compulsory retirement.

cumulative

affecting his pension. Withholding of 05. increments of pay

employment with Govt. Penalties under NPCIL(Conduct) Rules 1994

The following penalties may be imposed on an employee as herein after provided for misconduct committed by him or for any other good and sufficient reasons:
Page 40 of 86

S.N. MINOR PENALTIES 01. Censure

S.N. 01.

MAJOR PENALTIES Reduction to a lower stage in the scale of pay for a specified period and with further directions as to whether the employee will earn increment during the period of reduction and whether on expiry of such period, the reduction will or will not have the effect of postponing increments. the future

02.

Withholding of increments 02. of pay with or without cumulative effect.

Reduction to lower scale of pay which shall ordinarily be a bar to the promotion of the employee to the scale of pay from which he was reduced with or without further regarding directions

conditions of restoration to the scale of pay from which the 03. 04. Withholding of promotion. 03. Recovery from pay whole 04. or part of any pecuniary employee was reduced. Compulsory retirement from service. Removal from service which shall not be a disqualification

Page 41 of 86

loss

caused

to

the

for future employment in the Corporation. Removal from service which shall ordinarily for in be a the disqualification employment Corporation. future

Corporation by negligence 05. or breach of orders. Reduction to a lower stage 05. in the scale of a pay for a period not exceeding 3 years without cumulative effect and not adversely affecting the pension in the case of an employee who was an en masse deputationist and got absorbed in the Company.

MISCONDUCT UNDER INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT (STANDING ORDERS) ACT 1946 :

Sl.No. PENALTIES 01. A workman may be fined upto 2 percent of his wages in a month 02. for any of the acts and omission. A workman may be suspended for a period not exceeding 4 days at a time or dismissed without notice or any compensation in lieu of 03. notice, if he is found to be guilty of his misconduct. On being found guilty of the charges, an orde of dismissal, or suspension or fine or stoppage of annual increment or reduction in rank would be passed under clause 14(4) C.

COMPARISON 01;
From the penalties specified above under various rules, it is seen that Suspension is not a penalty under CCS (CCA) Rules-1965 and NPCIL (Conduct) Rules 1994 whereas, suspension is a penalty under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act-1946.

Page 42 of 86

It is also important to note following decision of Supreme Court of India in SCC 35, para 4 enumerated hereunder : ANOTHER SPECIAL FEATURE OF THE PROCEEDING AGAINST THE WORKMEN IS THAT WHERE THE VARIOUS MISCONDUCTS HAVE SPECIFICALLY BEEN ENUMERATED IN THE STANDING ORDERS, A WORKMAN CANNOT BE PUNISHED FOR SOME ACT OR OMMISSION NOT FALLING WITHIN THAT LIST. (GLAXO LABORATORIES V. PRESIDING OFFICER, (1984) 1 SCC 1; RASIKLAL V. PATEL V. AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, (1985)

AN ILLUSTRATION 01 :
Just a couple of years ago, when these rules were not fully understood by administrative people of NPCIL at Rajasthan Atomic Power Station, an employee was issued charge sheet for some misconduct followed by his suspension. During the enquiry, the charged officer had engaged union representatives as Defense Assistant to defend the case on his behalf. After the conclusion of enquiry proceedings, the charged officials was imposed some penalty under the Model Standing Orders. The matter was objected by the union representative and an Industrial Dispute was also raised on the ground that for an offence two penalties cannot be imposed. Then only it was known that suspension is also a penalty under Standing Orders. The reason for this misunderstanding was that Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1976 was not applicable to the employees of NPCIL earlier, and on its applicability to NPCIL, nobody was thorough.

ILLUSTRATION 02:
Withholding of promotion is a minor penalty under NPCIL (Conduct)
Page 43 of 86

Rules-1994 as well as under CCS (CCA) Rules-1964. Whereas, this is not specified as a penalty under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act1946. Generally, withholding of promotion is such a penalty which has not financial bearings on the employees immediately but applies seriously as NPCIL has merit promotion scheme. Sometimes, employees earn promotion by dint of their hard work within a period of 3 years. However, the provision not being available in IE (SO) Act-1946, this penalty which is easy to impose and has not future repercussion cannot be imposed on such employees of NPCIL who are governed by this Act.

Page 44 of 86

PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE

INTRODUCTION :

Page 45 of 86

It is also one of the very important aspects of disciplinary proceeding. With my experience, I am stating that whenever disciplinary proceedings are in the right direction or the charges are grave, evidences are solid, witnesses are strong, charged officer is in the look out for an opportunity to find out any loop hole during the inquiry which he may encash in his favour. The Principles of Natural justice are certain rules fundamental to dispensation of justice. Natural justice simply stated, is fair play in action as was observed in the case of Menaka Gandhi v Union of India. Thus, principles of natural justice are fundamental rules of judicial procedure and are indicative of mans eternal quest for a full and complete justice. In one of the cases it was observed that :

THE REQUIREMENT OF PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE MUST DEPEND ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, THE NATURE OF THE INQUIRY, THE RULES UNDER WHICH THE TRIBUNAL IS ACTING , THE SUBJECT MATTER THAT S BEING DEALT WITH AND SO FORTH

PRINCIPLES :

Page 46 of 86

For dispensation of justice, there are two principles of natural justice which are universally recognised.

NEMO JUDEX IN CAUSA SUA , it means that no one shall be a judge in his
own cause. In other words, the person deciding the matter must not have anything like personal interest in the case ; and

AUDI ALTERAM PARTEM, it means that hear the other side, i.e. the accused
person must have an adequate opportunity to present his defence and prove his innocence.

BIAS :
Bias in common English parlance means and implies- predisposition or prejudice. It may arise from pecuniary or personal interest of the person who decides. The test for bias is that if a reasonable man would think on the basis of the existing circumstances that he is likely to be prejudiced, that is sufficient to quash the decision.

PERSONAL INTEREST :

Page 47 of 86

PERSONAL INTEREST
Personal bias

OFFICIAL INTEREST

may be due to Official bias is present when a person

some incident taken place in acts as a party and as a judge in the same personal life with the action of the cause in his official capacity. accused. Where the officer relies more on his personal knowledge of the matter than on an objective and impartial assessment. Another example of prejudice being caused is where an officer rather than exercising his own discretion acts on the dictation of some one else. Bias may also be caused when the officer who decides had pre-judged the issue and expressed his opinion before hand. Official interest may be to pull down the person for his personal gain in office i.e. status, reputation and peace etc.

REASONABLE HEARING :
The soul of audi alteram partem rule is fair play in action. Its essence is good conscience in a given situation : nothing more but nothing less. In fact, fairness itself is flexible and relative concept, not a rigid ritualistic or sophisticated abstraction. In an important case the court observed and added that there was no ground to be frightened delay, inconvenience and expense, if natural justice gained access.

A LIVE EXAMPLE : A disciplinary proceeding was initiated against a very senior officer just a couple of years ago. During the preliminary hearing itself, it took the shape of regular

Page 48 of 86

hearing between Presenting Officer and charged officer. The dialogues which were not to take place between PO and CO ran into good number of pages. CO was not given opportunity of even submitting list of defence witnesses and list of defence documents. He was also not given time to look for a right defence assistant. List of defence documents given by the CO were also rejected on the ground of irrelevancy. Requests and appeals made by the CO failed to bring any result and finally, he had to approach Court and matter was stayed with solid grounds. Therefore, care should be taken to ensure that the speed should not be too rash to derail from the track. Here, only question arises that reasonable hearing should be given to CO. I would like to bring beautifully summed up observation of court in Byrne v. Kinemetograph Renters Society, 1958 as under: Firstly, I think that the person accused should know the nature of accusation made; secondly, that he should be given an opportunity to state his case and thirdly, of course, that the tribunal should act in a good faith. I do not think that there really is anything more. In nut shell, it is not merely of some importance, but is of fundamental importance that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly seem to be done. The Principles of Natural Justice will not be violated if following precautions are taken :

The employee must be told what are the charges leveled against him and the allegations on which they are based. He must be informed of the evidence on which the charges are sought to be established to enable him to put forward his defence.
Page 49 of 86

 The charges should be informed in writing. Verbal reading of the charge sheet does not constitute service of the charge. It should be ensured that the provisions of article-311 are not violated i.e. the charge sheet should be issued by the right disciplinary authority. While appointing the Inquiry Officer, Disciplinary Authority should ensure that he should not be a person biased against the charged employee nor a complainant nor should be a witness in the case. In appropriate cases, having legal overtones or involving legal or factual complexities or where the status of PO so warrants, CO should be allowed to engage a Legal Practitioner. Documents which are indicated in the charge sheet as well as documents which he wants to support in his defence should be made available to him on demand. He should also have right of inspection of the original of these documents. The supply of these documents should be before commencement of the inquiry and not at the conclusion of the inquiry. Copies of statements recorded during preliminary hearing and investigation of the witnesses cited in the charge sheet should also be supplied to the charged officer. Summoning the prosecution and defence witnesses should be done by the Inquiry Officer. He cannot say that calling defence witnesses is the responsibility of the charge officer. By doing this, he may be violating the principles of natural justice. The charged officer should be given full opportunity to cross examine the witnesses appearing against him. He should also be allowed to examine himself if he so desires. It is also important to note here that if any new evidence is to be recorded, the CO should be given adequate adjournments.

Page 50 of 86

 It should also be noted that the proceeding should not be held ex-parte in an unreasonable manner. Before CO is asked to file his written brief, he should be supplied with a copy of the Presenting Officers brief. Generally, it is presumed that the report of the inquiry has nothing to do with the principles of natural justice. But this perception is not correct. The inquiry report should be a reasoned document and it must contain statement of facts, an analysis of the facts and arguments and reasons for the conclusions finally reached. The report of the inquiry should not contain any thing which did not come up during the course of inquiry. In other words, the IO should confine his report to the records of the case prepared during the course of inquiry. THE VERY IMPORTANT PRINCIPLE OF NATURAL JUSTICE IS THAT IT IS FOR THE PROSECUTION TO PROVE THE CHARGE. IT IS WRONG IF THE BURDEN OF ESTABLISHING THE INNOCENCE IS PLACED ON THE CHARGED OFFICER. Moreover, there should be sufficient evidence against the charged employee. The findings of the guilt cannot be recorded on the basis of suspicion alone, how so ever grave the charge. The report of the Inquiry Officer, where it is adverse, should be supplied to the charged officer before the report is considered by the disciplinary authority. Here one thing is very important, which is generally skipped by the disciplinary authority, is that he should consider the matter with an open mind and should take final decision by proper application of mind. Wherever, the disciplinary authority proposes to disagree with the report of Inquiry Officer, the reasons for his disagreement, should be recorded in writing and forwarded to charged officer for making effective representation by the CO before consideration of the matter.

Page 51 of 86

 The discretion to impose the punishment should not be exercised in an arbitrary manner or is actuated by mala fides. And the last but not the least, the final order should be a speaking order to exhibit the principles of natural justice. It has been seen on many occasions that the orders of the disciplinary authority have been quashed by the tribunals merely for the reasons that they were not speaking orders. NON-APPLICABILITY OF PRINCIPLES : Inspite of the above raised points, principles of natural justice will not apply in the following cases : a) Where doctrine of Pleasure applies : Where action is based on the principle of doctrine of pleasure, the principles of Natural Justice are excluded. In other words, once doctrine of pleasure is applicable, neither the principle of natural justice would step in nor any question of giving opportunity before removal would arise. b) Natural justice has no application to codified law: Principles of natural justice cannot supersede codified law. In fact, the purpose of natural justice is to supplement the law and not to supplant it. If a situation is governed by express provisions of the law or the rules, the applicability of natural justice to that extent is excluded. However, where specific rules are not there, the gap is filled by the natural justice by application of mind. c) Rule of Necessity : When there is only one authority who can conduct proceedings and that authority is biased against the person against whom the proceedings are conducted, the bias will not vitiate the proceedings. But the rule of necessity is not applicable where an alternative authority can be found to conduct the proceedings.

Page 52 of 86

SUMMARY : Though the Principles of Natural Justice must be given due importance, care must be taken against any over emphasis. These principles can not be elevated to the positions of Fundamental Rights. Natural justice is prescribed only a minimum standard of fair procedure and this minimum can not be bloated into a rigmarole of technicalities to vitiate the inquiry somehow or other.

#############

Page 53 of 86

AVOIDING DELAYS AND DILATORY TACTICS

Page 54 of 86

AVOIDING DELAYS AND DILATORY TACTICS

The object of domestic inquiry is speedy disposal in conformity with fair play. It is, therefore, the duty of the Inquiry Officer, the Presenting Officer, the Charged employee and his Defence Assistant to make every effort to cut all delays and contribute to the speedy final disposal of inquiry. There are two negative aspects, in my view, if the delay is caused which are as under : EFFECTS TO EMPLOYER

EFFECTS TO EMPLOYEE Due to delay the employee becomes a loser. He cannot get any promotion or other advancements in service so long as clouds of disciplinary proceedings are there. In most of the cases, the employee loses his peace of mind also he cannot devote fully to the office work as it should be. On also account with of seal of that family disciplinary employee proceedings prolonged and his

Delays defeat the very purpose of The purpose of disciplinary

the inquiry.

proceedings is not only to punish the culprit for violation of rules or misconduct but also to streamline the administrative machinery so that such things do not happen again an blood flows through the veins of administrative machinery without fear of any clog. This is possible only if we are quick in taking disciplinary proceedings.

delays,

Memories fail with time, witness

may die or own over, record may become unavailable for any reason, the delays are thus to the benefit of the wrong doer who may escape because of negligence and consequent delays.

members are socially boycotted. For all these reasons, there is no option but to cut delay with strong hand and dispose of disciplinary cases with utmost speed.

Page 55 of 86

Sometimes, Charged Officer either with the wrong advice or for some other reasons, adopts dilatory tactics. He might of the opinion that delay may cause erosion of memory of witnesses, chances of misplacing documents etc may give him benefit at a later stage. But such perceptions on the part of CO are not correct. In most of the cases they are imposed some or other penalties and they lose their promotions as in our organisation, time bound merit promotions are applicable ranging from 3-5 years. The delays can be avoided by the Inquiry Officer including the delays due to dilatory tactics adopted by the CO. Here, I shall try to bring out such points of delay and discuss the remedial measures to avoid them. DELAYS TO BE AVOIDED BY THE INQUIRY OFFICER

The Preliminary Hearing :

On receipt of the order of his appointment as Inquiry Officer, and connected papers, the IO should not lose any time in fixing up the date of Preliminary hearing. This does not present any difficulty as the object of the hearing is to sort out certain preliminaries. The IO can hold the preliminary hearing in his office. Also, adjournments should not be granted merely on the ground that CO has not been able to arrange the Defence Assistant. It is my experience that on many occasions, this plea is taken by the CO.

Inspection of documents :
Every effort should be made to stick to the time limits prescribed in the rules for this purpose. Similarly, any delay in deciding the relevance of additional documents and requisitioning them should also be avoided. The matter has to be pursued by IO itself to avoid the delay.

Page 56 of 86

A major cause of delay in procuring additional documents is the irregular action of the IOs to put the burden on Presenting Officers. It is my experience in many cases that IOs are passing the onus on Presenting Officers for the same. Generally, it should be avoided as the authority which IO has got over these documents, PO has none. Moreover, no time limit can be prescribed by PO as can be done by IO.

Defence Assistant :
As soon as the particulars of the proposed defence assistant are received from the CO, no time should be wasted in getting in touch with his controlling authority so that he is relieved to attend the hearings on schedule. The controlling authority may be contacted through an official letter followed by personal contact, where necessary.

Regular Hearings :
The regular hearings should be held on day today basis, and completed expeditiously. Unnecessary adjournments must be avoided at all costs. To avoid delays, the witnesses should be informed about the date and time when their presence is required, much in advance : an intimation also being sent to their controlling authorities to ensure their presence. In case of common proceedings where COs and witnesses are from different locations, efforts should be made that the IO should summon them at Head quarters where all of them can come simultaneously.

Page 57 of 86

Absence of Inquiry Officer himself :

After a date of hearing is fixed by the IO and intimations are sent out, the IO should make it a point to attend it. If, for some personal reasons, it is not possible for him to be present, necessary intimations should be sent without delay fixing another date. There is no procedure for the IO to delegate his functions of holding the inquiry to somebody else.

Written Briefs:
It is my experience that considerable delay takes place in submission of written brief both Presenting Officer and Defence. Time schedule has been prescribed for submission of written brief. It is the duty of the IO to ensure on the last day of final hearing on which defence case completes to instruct the Presenting Officer to submit the written brief within a weeks time or ten days depending upon the lengthy enquiry. To cut short the delays, a method of supplying a copy of written brief to CO directly instead of to IO has been adopted by some of the IOs. In such circumstances, IOs also prescribe time schedule for defence in no. of days from the date of receipt of a copy from Presenting Officer by defence.

The Report of inquiry :

The report of inquiry must be written and submitted expeditiously. Inordinate delay in submission of report will not only neutralize all the good steps taken by him during the course of inquiry to expedite the proceeding but may also vitiate the proceeding in certain situation, for instance where the delay is too long.
Page 58 of 86

In one case where the IO had rejected the request for adjournment to examine the witness because adjournments for the purpose has already been granted, but himself took 2 months to submit his report, it was held that the refusal to adjourn was not justified. (State of UP v. CS Sharma, AIR-1963. All.94) Inspite of all these, it is seen that IOs show hasteness during the inquiry, but they take considerable time in preparing the report on many flimsy grounds that they were quite busy, load of work on them was high, many urgent meetings were scheduled etc. etc.

Dilatory tactics by the Charged Officer :

If delays are causing harm to any one the most, it is CO. Therefore, he should be watchful and represent against any unreasonable delay, to the Inquiry Officer/Disciplinary Authority. However, contrary to this fact, COs have been seen adopting dilatory tactics. Let us see what are the possible grounds on which the CO adopts these techniques and also how to curb these delays :

1.0 Representation against Bias in the Inquiry :

Generally in the most of the inquiries, representation of bias against IO is received with a view to adopt dilatory tactics. In such circumstances as soon as the representation is received, the inquiry is stayed till its disposal by the Disciplinary Authority. Towards this, DA should make efforts to dispose off the representation quickly and IO should resume the inquiry without waste of time.

Page 59 of 86

2.0 Preliminary Hearing :

The preliminary hearing should not be postponed for the only reason that the CO has not been able to arrange for his defence Assistant. He has sufficient notice of preliminary hearing, so if he comes up with a DA, well and good; otherwise the nature of work to be transacted in the preliminary hearing is such that the defence of employee will not be prejudiced in the absence of the Defence Assistant

3.0 Inspection of documents :

The delay may be caused at this stage, by the delinquent employee, by not giving full particulars of the documents he wishes to inspect for his defence or not indicating their relevance to his case, in sufficient detail. To avoid such delays, it is suggested that in the preliminary hearing itself the position should be made very clear to the CO that he must come up with full particulars and adequate mention of relevance in his list of defence documents, in the absence of which the documents will not be requisitioned and no further time will be granted.

4.0 Defence Assistant :

The usual dilatory tactic is that the CO furnishes particulars of the DA without actually consulting him or without making sure that he will be relieved for the purpose. To avoid the tactic, at the time of accepting particulars of the proposed DA, IO should insist upon a certificate from the person concerned to the effect that he is willing to render DA and he does not anticipate any difficulty in his being relieved for the purpose. This position should also be made clear to him in the preliminary hearing itself. It is no doubt that the CO is entitled to DA of his choice but the facility cannot be allowed to be converted by him in an interminable process of delay or adjournments.
Page 60 of 86

5.0 The Regular Hearing :

The golden advice to avoid all dilatory tactics during the course of regular hearings is BE REASONABLE BUT BE FIRM. A crooked employee may try to hamper proceeding by asking for adjournments on flimsy grounds. The IO should deal with each such objection on its merits and take quick decisions. Once a decision is taken, he should be firm in enforcing it. It may be mentioned here that no appeal lies against an order of the IO made during the course of inquiry.

6.0 Written Brief :

The IO should stick to the prescribed dates firmly. But, it shall be possible only if he himself does not cause undue delay in writing and submission of his report.

Resort to Court Proceedings :

The Inquiry proceedings need not be stayed for the only reason that the CO has approached a court or filed an application before the CAT or a writ petition before a High Court. The proceeding should be stayed only if a stay order has been granted.

Page 61 of 86

SUMMARY :
These are most of the points where dilatory tactics are adopted by the delinquent employee, though the delay is harmful to him only most. Apart from the above points, I have come across in many inquiries practically where it is wisdom of IO which can stop the delay and even some times it does not work. The CO crosses all the limits by his cunning behaviour. Here, one thing is very heartening to note that during the tenure of Shri N. Vittal, Chief Vigilance Commission had issued guidelines prescribing schedule of all the activities of disciplinary proceedings, to curb the undue delays. According to this guideline, the proceeding is to be completed in any case within a period of 3-6 months. The guideline also contained that failure to complete the proceedings within the prescribed schedule by the IO, will be viewed very seriously and IOs can be proceeded against for lapse on their part. After issuance of this guidelines, we used to attach a copy of this order with time schedule for the information of IOs and it was result oriented. In nut shell, it is Inquiry Officer whose wisdom, presence of mind etc. can help in cutting short the delays. Thus, a duty is cast on Disciplinary Authority, in my view, to ensure that dynamic, sincere and neutral persons are only appointed to work as Inquiry Officers.

@ # #@ # @@##

Page 62 of 86

ROLES OF VARIOUS AUTHORITIES

Page 63 of 86

INTRODUCTION :
There are three important functionaries in the departmental inquiries i.e. Disciplinary Authority, Inquiring Authority popularly known as Inquiry Officer and Presenting Officer. Once orders for appointment of IO is issued, Disciplinary Authority has not to play much role except disposal of bias representation, if any, received in this regard against the Inquiry Officer. Main role during the domestic inquiry is played by IO and then comes role of Presenting Officer. It is only IO who has to man the inquiry in a very systematic manner, adhere to the time schedule in completing the inquiry, regulate the unnecessary adjournments and control the nuisance of CO and his defence assistant during the inquiry. The above being the position, I have been observing that neither such books are available which clearly indicate the role of each functionary in detail nor these functionaries have enough time to search for the pearl from the deep ocean. Keeping this in view, I am trying to garland the duties of above functionaries so that the reader is not required to extract butter from milk by spending enough energy for the purpose.

ROLE OF INQUIRY OFFICER :

TO CHECK ORDER OF APPOINTMENT : Disciplinary proceedings are quasi judicial in nature. You can hold an inquiry only if you are duly authorised to do so by the competent Disciplinary Authority, through a formal written order. The inquiry should be commenced only after being so appointed. Any subsequent order of appointment shall not cure the initial lack of jurisdiction and the proceedings held up to that stage shall stand vitiated.
Page 64 of 86

1.2 GET ACQUAINTED WITH NATURE OF ACCUSATIONS AND PROCEDURE TO HOLD INQUIRY :
Get hold of papers required instantly, mentioned in the annexure to the Charge sheet. By going through these papers you will get acquainted with the nature of charge and the evidence on which it is based. Be also fully conversant with the procedure to be followed to hold the inquiry. Plan the holding of Preliminary Hearing : He should decide the date, time and venue for holding the preliminary hearing. Normally PH should be held within 10-20 days from the date of appointment as IO. He should send the notices of hearing to the parties and it is mandatory to send the notices through registered post or may be served in person. 1.3 He should find out whether charged officer wishes to admit charge in preliminary hearing. If he does, it should get recorded and signed by him. In the process, the inquiry is to be conducted in respect of the charges not admitted by him. 1.4 There will be many disputed issues regarding number of documents and witnesses to be examined etc. A free and frank discussion with the CO and PO will go a long way to eliminate unnecessary discussions. A well planned discussion will place a proper focus before the IO. 1.5 Normally, since the documents mostly produced in the inquiries are official documents, their authenticity and genuineness is not challenged. However, if CO has any doubt over any document, PO may be requested to arrange for its proof. 1.6 Regarding inspection of listed documents, IO has to ensure that this should be done during preliminary hearing. Also, for additional documents,
Page 65 of 86

relevancy should be quickly decided and if necessary should be requisitioned. Documents which are not to be allowed, its reasons should be recorded by the IO for fair play. The certificate of inspection should be obtained from the defence side to ensure that the authenticity of documents listed are not challenged. At the same time relevancy of defence witnesses should also be expeditiously decided. 1.7 Before commencement of regular hearing, certificate from defence assistant is to be obtained necessarily that he does not have more than the prescribed case in hand for defence. 1.8 Once inspection of documents and decision to allow defence witnesses is taken, IO should hold the regular hearing on day today basis without avoidable loss of time. During this period, there may be many dilatory tactics from defence side which IO has to defeat by fixing the date as early as possible. He should also conduct the inquiry fairly and firmly. He should also ensure that CO is provided necessary opportunity to put up his case but at the same time, his unnecessary demands and dilatory tactics should also be curbed. 1.9 The witnesses should be treated respectfully and examined courteously. It is the duty of IO to ensure that a witness is so treated and that no questions are put to him with the purpose to annoy or insult him. I would like to mention here that some times witnesses are very senior officers and they do not like to come and attend inquiry for such undue harassment. 1.10 The depositions made by the witnesses should invariably recorded during the inquiry and signatures obtained. These depositions should also be authenticated by the inquiry officer and copies thereof should be supplied to the CO and the Presenting Officer. 1.11 One very important role of the IO is that he has to function during the inquiry in such a way that he wins the confidence of the CO. Similarly, he should not admit any new evidence to fill the gaps during the inquiry.

Page 66 of 86

1.12 Sometimes, when CO is not attending the inquiry, and it is conducted expate, he should allow the CO to participate at any stage, he desires. While doing so, he need not recall the witnesses already examined. 1.13 There may be occasions when IO has to conduct inquiry during the common proceedings. In such situations when some employee involved in the inquiry retires, he should continue the inquiry. However, the proceedings have to be suspended if a co-accused dies or is dismissed from service.
1.14

In part heard inquiries, it is better to take up threads where they were left by earlier IO. However, new IO is free to take up proceedings, de novo but it should be done in exceptional cases only. Notwithstanding the above, if considered necessary, a witness may be recalled for examination.

1.15 He should also pose mandatory questions at the close of inquiry. However, it is not mandatory where the CO opts to be his own witness. 1.16 IO should allow copy of written brief of Presenting Officer to the Charged Officer, but the copy of written brief of the CO need not and should not be supplied to the Presenting Officer. 1.17 The Inquiry Officer is not free to assess the value of the evidence he has recorded, according to his own notions. There are well settled and time honoured norms for such evaluation. He should evaluate the evidentiary value of each piece of evidence recorded during the inquiry correctly and properly. After this, he should submit a full blooded report of inquiry without any avoidable delay to the Disciplinary Authority along with all original records. 1.18 At the last, it is very important to mention here that IO should not keep anything with him.

Page 67 of 86

ROLE OF PRESENTING OFFICER :

The departmental inquiries cannot be equated with proceedings before the courts of law. The inquiring authority is not a court and the presenting officer is not a public prosecutor. Such inquiries are basically, fact finding exercises. Hence, the proper role for the presenting officer is to assist, to the best of his ability, the inquiring authority to reach the truth, by presenting before him the case of the disciplinary authority in its correct perspective. The primary role and function of the PO is to marshal facts before the inquiry officer and to examine and cross-examine the witnesses produced during the inquiry. Thus he should : 2.1 Assist IO during preliminary hearing to sort out the preliminaries. 2.2 He should supply copies of documents in support of the charges and allow inspection of the originals to the charged employee when so directed by the IO. 2.3 Supply copies of the earlier statement of witnesses mentioned in the list of prosecution witnesses along with the inspection of documents. 2.4 Produce the listed documents before the IO in the beginning of the regular hearing so that they are brought on record; and to prove the disputed documents by examining the relevant official witnesses. 2.5 Lead in a logical manner the oral evidence before the IO in the support of the charge. 2.6 Where necessary, to make timely request to the inquiry officer for the production of some new or additional evidence not mentioned in the charge sheet. The right stage for making such request is after he has examined all the witnesses he had to and before the defence case begins.
Page 68 of 86

2.7 Cross examine effectively witnesses produced by the defence. 2.8 Submit his written brief summing up his case with a copy to the CO after all evidence has been recorded in the case. Wherever permitted, argue the case orally.

GUIDELINES FOR THE PRESENTING OFFICER :

The aim of the PO during the inquiry is to bring out truth so that justice is secured to the charged employee. In order to achieve this aim, the PO must act fairly and present the case in its true colour. In order to discharge his duties efficiently, the Presenting Officer : Should examine properly his order of appointment and that of the IO to satisfy himself that there is no legal flaw and that the order have been attested by an authority competent to authenticate them. Should have discussion with the investigating officer and also have a look on the report of preliminary inquiry along with the connected record to get first hand knowledge of the case. Should acquaint himself fully with the departmental rules and technical aspects of the issues in dispute. Should attend the preliminary hearing along with the original records. In this hearing, he should assist the IO in framing of the issues where necessary and also quickly to arrange for the inspection of listed documents by the CO and supply to him of the earlier statements recorded during investigation of the witnesses proposed to be examined in regular inquiry. Should examine all the documents to be produced in the support of articles of charge and to arrange for proof of the documents which the CO does not admit to be correct and needing to be proved. Should remember that on the first day of regular hearing, the various documents will be marked as exhibits and taken over by the IO.

Page 69 of 86

 Should be polite towards the CO and the defence witnesses and should not lose their sympathy. Should refrain from attacking character of the charged employee unless it becomes absolutely unavoidable due to exigencies of the case. Should before hand decide what aspects of the case he wishes to be borne out by which witness so that in the examination-in-chief he can restrict evidence of each prosecution witnesses to the facts best known to him. Decide the proper sequence in which he desires to examine the witnesses. He may also decide whether to examine all the listed witnesses or some of them including the sequence of the examination. He must take care to lead all evidence at the proper time because to recall a witness or to introduce fresh evidence is a difficult process and can be resorted to only when there is a inherent lacuna. Examine the investigating officer as the last witness and that also if extremely necessary. Must follow the cross-examination of his witnesses carefully and to reexamine them to clarify any important point, or to put the records straight, in deserving cases. Should avoid re-examination as we know that in number of cases in which reckless re-examination resulted in spoiling effectiveness of the witnesses which had been built earlier. Therefore, he should take proper care. Must satisfy himself about trustworthiness of the defence witness before their examination begins. Must cross- examine the defence witnesses ably and tactfully to bring out truth and to expose hollowness of their testimony, where necessary. He may discredit them by impeaching their trustworthiness. At the close of the inquiry, sum up argument or file the written brief. He must understand that since the burden of proof is on the prosecution, he should be

Page 70 of 86

able to show with reference to the documentary and oral evidence produced during the inquiry that the articles of charge have been proved substantially. Take care that his written brief is based only on the evidence adduced during the course of inquiry. He should avoid reference to any extraneous matter. Any reference toward document or attaching it with the written brief which was not allowed during the inquiry, must be avoided. More important aspect that he should take care that he should not be interested in the outcome of the inquiry. He should see this as his part of duty. He should not have any intention either to prove or disprove the charges.

ROLE OF THE DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY :

3.1 ONLY DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY CAN TAKE PROCEEDINGS : Before an authority institutes a disciplinary proceedings against an employee, it must, right in the outset, ask himself one important question. Am I the competent disciplinary authority in this case? Only a YES answer to this question will give that authority a go ahead signal. The reason is that in the Union and the State Govt. or the Public Undertakings etc. all situations governed by statutory provisions, any superior authority cannot, ipso facto, impose a formal penalty on an employee unless it happens to be the prescribed disciplinary authority under the relevant disciplinary rules. 3.2 Disciplinary Authority must not delegate the powers to others for initiation of disciplinary proceedings as these powers are derived by statutory provisions.

Page 71 of 86

3.3 It should be noted that delegation of power for functioning does not enhance or improve the rank. Similarly, declaring an officer as Head of Department is only for functioning and does not improve his rank. The Supreme Court has observed delegation of the power to make a particular appointment does not enhance or improve the hierarchical status of the delegate. An officer subordinate to another will not become his equal in rank by reason of his coming to possess some of the powers of that another. 3.4 An officer holding the current charge only cannot exercise the powers of disciplinary authority because there is a difference between a person appointed to officiate in a higher post and a person who is merely placed in current charge of duties in a higher post. Such a person without being clothed with that rank as in the case of an officiating appointment can also exercise administrative or financial powers vested in that incumbent, but not any statutory powers of that post. 3.5 Wherever President or Governor is the appointing authority, it is not necessary that he is bound to make an order of dismissal or removal. The correct position is that an order in the name of President is authenticated by an officer authorised under relevant article. 3.6 Where it becomes necessary, the power to dismiss or remove can be conferred on an officer other than the appointing authority provided such authority is not subordinate in rank to the appointing authority of the employee concerned. In nut shell, the Disciplinary Authority so appointed should be of equal rank.

Page 72 of 86

3.7 The main important role of disciplinary authority is to confirm that action he is proposing to take is commensurate with the gravity of the offence. On many times, it has been seen that the gravity of offence is very less and charge sheet is issued for major penalty. In such cases, Disciplinary Authorities should use their mind and not act under the pressure of the power full people in the department.

SUMMARY :
The roles of Disciplinary Authority, Inquiry Officer and Presenting Officer as prescribed above are not exhaustive but at the same time not less also. If some of these roles and guidelines are followed by them, they can perform a balanced role for the inquiry and during the inquiry. At the same time they can remain far from the accusations of bias etc. More so, their actions can not be challenged in the court of law. It is also not only necessary but useful in our day today life if we possess reasonably thorough knowledge of the work which we are assigned or required to do. There will not be interest in the job which you do not know. For these reasons alone, understanding ones role and responsibility is a wealth.

#$#$#$#$

Page 73 of 86

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Page 74 of 86

Research Methodology Adopted Statement of the Problem

We are in the glaring world and human needs are endless. This is tempting persons to grow rich quickly and acquire wealth and materials of worldly status, comfort and luxury abundantly. On the other side public servants have limited salary and resources. There is not equilibrium between their income and unwanted and unnecessary expenditure. This is causing public servants to indulge in misconducts such as bribery, gratification, misappropriation of employers money and misbehavior with seniors on such counts. Here only comes disciplinary rules to discipline them for their misconduct etc. Sometimes, in spite of clear cut cases and strong witnesses and documentary proofs etc. accused employee gets escape for following reasons. Non-application of right rules. Non-application of right procedures Not providing reasonable opportunity to accused and violation of principles of natural justice Lack of knowledge of rules and procedures to Inquiry Officer and Presenting Officers.

Page 75 of 86

Research Methodology The research is based on the experience of researcher who is employed as Personnel Manger in NPCIL and has experience of handling disciplinary cases exclusively for more than 4 years and experience of working in 4 different Units of NPCIL located at different parts of the country in the States of Gujarat, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. The steps involved in the study includes. Defining the needs and problem. Comparison of all three sets of rules applicable in the Organisation Identification of disparity in all these rules, identification of procedural lapses, identification of negative aspect etc. Focusing the important aspect such as bias, Principles of Natural Justice, Avoiding delays in conduct of inquiries, Roles of various authorities, and recommendations for improvements. Establishing controls and other requirements for fool proof procedure.

Page 76 of 86

RECOMMENDATIONS

Page 77 of 86

Conclusion and Recommendations

Areas For Improvement

With my experience and after detailed study of the subject based on the research methodology adopted and the practices followed in the organization, I have listed following points where improvements are needed. This will give direction for future research in these areas. These areas are as under

Simplification of the Procedure

Like the court cases, it is seen that disciplinary cases are also very complex in nature. Because of their complexity and typical procedures, it takes long time in examination, cross-examinations and re-examinations of prosecution as well as defence witnesses. Therefore, the procedure needs to be simplified.

Standardization of the procedure.

There are different procedures for imposition of minor penalty and major penalty. Similarly, under NPCIL Conduct Rules and Industrial Employment Standing Order Act, the procedures are different. These different procedures being adopted for different class of employees in a single Organisation for similar and single misconduct are causing grudge among the employees. Therefore, apart from simplification of the procedures, the procedures should also be standardized.

Page 78 of 86

Training and Awareness

As our Department is a Scientific Department, Inquiry Officers are mostly from Scientific categories. They may be very expert in their work but they need training and awareness in the areas of disciplinary proceedings to function as Inquiry Officer as the inquiries being conducted by them is quasi-judicial in nature, the training is essential particularly, with reference to different kinds of rules for different kinds of employees. Training with adequate procedures at regular interval should be conducted.

Adherence of the Time Schedule.

Though there are guidelines from Chief Vigilance Commission (CVC) that the disciplinary proceedings should be completed within a period not exceeding six months for major penalty and within three months for minor penalty, Inquiry officers are not adhering to the time schedule either prescribed by the CVC or disciplinary authority. Experience speaks that some of the inquiry officer take years together to complete the inquiry. Therefore, if they are aware of the complications and future of the accused employee they will be completing the work assigned to them within the time schedule. Therefore, disciplinary authority should, before appointing them as inquiry officer will give a time schedule to complete the inquiry.

Justice
It is very popular proverb that Justice delayed is justice denied keeping this in view, the disciplinary authority should ensure that there is no abnormal delay in delivering the justice. Moreover, justice should not only be done but manifestly it should appear have been done.
Page 79 of 86

Approach by Disciplinary Authority

Disciplinary Authority should also adopt corrective approach rather than punitive approach. Most of the misconducts committed by the employees are under circumstances beyond their control. Therefore, while initiating the disciplinary proceeding the disciplinary authority should take into cognizance the circumstances under which misconduct was committed. DA should make efforts to correct ad counsel the employees rather than punishing them. This will go a long way in building harmonious and cordial relations between employee and employer.

Strong Disciplinary Cell

In our organisation generally all units are having a disciplinary cell to form the charge-sheet, co-ordinate the functions of the inquiry and co-ordination with Corporate Vigilance and CVC etc. The cell is not strong enough at present. I should b strong enough in correcting and discipliing the errant employees so that there is no need of interference from the external agencies like CBI etc.

Faith of employees in system

The system should be so designed that employee should have faith in the system of disciplinary proceedings. Particularly, when it is under CCS(CCA) Rules1965, it has complicated procedure for major penalty charge-sheet. Apart from this, the system should be very simple and standard so that it is free from all kinds of ambiguity.

Page 80 of 86

Better Quality, Gain trust and confidence. The system of disciplinary proceedings should be such that it wins the trust and confidence of the employees. At present the system prevailing for initiating the disciplinary action is so lengthy, complicated, time taking that it is not better enough to gain trust and confidence of the employees. Apart from this sharp accused employees get benefit of this long and time taking procedure and remain unpunished.

Continual improvement in procedures There are always scope for continual improvement in any procedure not only in the disciplinary proceedings. It can be seen from the acts and rules which are prevailing with reference to disciplinary proceedings are very old and the procedures have not undergone any change towards simplicity and simplification of the procedure for quite long. We should also think for improvement of such procedures which an bring better result.

Suggestion from employees for further improvements.

It is necessary that we should also obtain from employees particularly from the charged employee or aggrieved employee for improvement of the system. Since they are the persons who are really better advisor having expertise with experience in this area to provide valuable suggestions for improvement of the system.

Page 81 of 86

Information exchange from sister organisation.

While considering other aspects it is also necessary that system and practices being followed by other system organisations in other units should also be adopted if required. This will also improve the efficiency in strengthening the system. Recommendations Disciplinary Authority should consider following points before thinking towards this direction. 1. Whether initiation of action for minor penalty will serve the purpose where it intends to take action for major penalty? 2. Whether warning or censure will serve the purpose where gravity of offence warrants initiation of minor penalty action? 3. Whether counseling will be able to replace the action of minor penalty, warning or censure? Disciplinary Authority should also not forget that behind every workman there is a family consisting children and because of their no fault they also become party to the misconduct of the employee. Forgiveness is such a tool which is even more heavier than any other kind of heavy tools. Institution of major penalty proceedings throw away the employees out of gear. It mars not only the life of employee but his innocent family members also. A harsh decision by the Disciplinary Authority may bring social and morale death to an employee. Therefore, Disciplinary Authority should think twice before initiating such action. This only can work as an image building in the organisation. Therefore, it should be resorted to as a tool when and where there is no other alternative except this.

Page 82 of 86

However, organization have to function in the right direction with the moto of development of the nation. Any action on the part of employee which is causing damage to the image of the organization, downfall of the society, erosion of the values and any damage to the track of development by their misconducts willingly and intentionally should certainly be viewed seriously and comparable punishments awarded with a view to demonstrate the policy of the Government and as a lesson to such other employees whose thinking are cropping-up towards heinous acts in the organisation. CONCLUSION

With my experience of Ten years, my observations are that in some of the units due to unfair handling of the people, some of employees have lost their interest of working. The sole reason which I have come to know from them is that they have not been treated well, they have not been given due respect, they have been ignored and side lined with their high level of ability than the officers to whom they are reporting. Other reason is that they were forced to compromise with their noble principles which they could not do. Such ill treatments have given them rise of dejection in their life and they were proceeded against. Nowadays, when we are in the ear of high technology and are considering man power as human resource, a duty is cast on the persons who are having expertise in these areas to cure these people and bring them on the track. Disciplinary action is not a solution and hence, it should be resorted to as a tool when counseling and other measures fail to yield required result.

Page 83 of 86

ABBREVIATIONS & BIBLIOGRAPHY

Page 84 of 86

ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS REPORT

NPCIL

Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited Central Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules 1965 Department of Atomic Energy Central Civil Services Presenting Officer Inquiry Officer Inquiring Authority Charged Official Defence Assistant/Disciplinary Authority Etcetera Narora Atomic Power Station Madras Atomic Power Station Rajasthan Atomic Power Station Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project Vikram Sarabhai Bhawan, Corporate Office Kaiga Generating Station

CCS(CCA) DAE CCS PO IO IA CO DA ETC NAPS MAPS RAPS KKNPP VSB CO KGS

Page 85 of 86

Bibliography (References)
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Commentary on the CCS(CCA) Rules By G.B. Singh, 6th Edition, January 2000 Hand Book for IO, PO and DA By G.B. Singh, 7th Edition, May 1999 Swamys Compilation of Conduct Rules by Muthuswamy & Brinda 31st Edition 1998 NPCIL (Conduct) Rules 1994 NPCIL (Disciplinary & Appeal) Rules 1996 Vol III updated version Nov. 2001 The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946 Aklank Publication Swamys Handbook 2007 Management Information System Reports submitted to Corporate Office by units

Page 86 of 86