Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Submitted by Steve Willis to Professor Mir Blazevic University of Wisconsin Ethics in the Workplace: The Implications of Ethics Decisions
Willis 2
Willis 3
Thus, it takes only one individual to do what is right and when the hard choice is imminent that said individual must stand for what is ethical regardless of the opposition, or complacency of others, or backlash. Therein lays the solution as to how one persons fervor can affect the entirety in a group dynamic. Standing up for what is right, as opposed to allowing unethical decisions to take place is the quintessential trait, and tantamount to establishing ethics and an ethical culture.
Contemporary
Ethical,
Social,
and
In Article 11 Are You Too Family Friendly?, one issue is that single employees felt resentment towards parents who reap the rewards of the family-friendly benefits their organization provides (Wells, 2007). As the article reports, these tensions are rooted in the misalignment between the traditional workplace and the largely nontraditional workforce (Wells, 2007, p. 36). People do not always realize the additional responsibilities involved with family and active parenting. Most family members contribute and perform non-paid work outside of the work place which contributes to their families. This work is sometimes equal to or more than the amount of paid hours of the work place. Single persons have an ability to use their time for leisurely activities. They should truly not feel any resentment towards employees with family based on not having the additional responsibilities of non-paid work involved in family and parenting. The reason companies may grant such flexibility to their employees is in order to avert and alleviate the pressures involved in work-family balance issues. By granting employees options to leave early, or take a flex day, permits employees to have the balance they need, considering they also need to provide equal attention to both their work and family lives In addition, employers have numerous effects on peoples lives. As a majority of employees tend to put work first, they make and base life decisions around work and their corresponding schedules. The impact of employers decisions on behalf of benefits and employment culture can significantly contribute to individuals actions. Work place misconduct can occur because of employees striking back at their work place organization. Ultimately, companies such as Recreational Equipment Incorporated (REI) supply their employees with a vast amount of employment benefits as well as other work place perks (REI, 2012). REI provides its employees with sufficient support in order to enable the possibility of a work-family balance. REI offers a Work/Life employee [assistance] programoffers access to services, referrals, three inperson visits and support to help us all in our quest to live and work well (REI, 2012). REI also states, the degree to which our employees lead balanced lives impacts our bottom line (REI, 2012). REI supplies its employees with training and developmental tools in order for them to educate and lead fulfilling, prosperous, and opportunistic careers of mobility. In contrast to benefits, the corporate social responsibility extends beyond the inner working of the company to its consumers or stakeholders. When things go wrong, corporate executives should be held accountable. For example, to foster community relations Wal-Mart recently announced that it is going green across all of its companys manufacturing sites. This however is a smoke screen which covers up the fact that egregious ethical violations in both human living and labor conditions have been problematic for Wal-Mart overseas, predominately in China (Greenwald, 2005). Workers face unacceptable conditions hard-working, poor and virtually
Willis 4
unprotected on the job. [for a] wage of less than $3 dollars per day (Holland, 2007). The exploitation of human capital and taking advantage of the lack of work place standards and laws is an abhorrent and abominable act. However, executives at Wal-Mart do not face prosecution or major scrutiny as their consumers continue to patronize their business; the public is also not truly aware of the real problems, created by this multi-national corporation operating unethically across transnational borders. The additional piece is that in a lapse of ethical decision making and by taking advantage of people serves to create a backlash of problems concerning quality. When an unsafe product hits the market, the results can be devastating as seen by the deaths of babies due to a 2008 case of tainted baby formula that contained melamine, an industrial chemical (Bradsher, 2008). Other products have made it to market but it is the response of companies to correct the problem. As seen with a Tylenol recall, costing an estimated $50 million in order to ensure and maintain its integrity with the publics opinion of the company and its consumers (Richardson and McCord, Trust in the Marketplace, 2000).
Willis 5
A 2006 Washington post article, titled Harmful Teflon Chemical To Be Eliminated by 2015, states: Eight U.S. companies, including giant DuPont Co., agreed yesterday to virtually eliminate a harmful chemical used to make Teflon from all consumer products coated with the ubiquitous nonstick material. Although the chemical would still be used to manufacture Teflon and similar products, processes will be developed to ensure that perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) would not be released into the environment from finished products or manufacturing plants. (Eilperin, 2006) Even after a supposed removal of harmful chemicals in consumer products, how will the consumers know whether or not there are trace amounts of chemicals left? Regulatory organizations seem complascent as well considering they work closely with the corporations. It is difficult to know what goes on behind closed door meetings when there is no transparency. Companies such as Monsanto have created an empire of genetically modified (GM or GMO) products and seeds. GMO products are supposed to be safe for human consumption, yet there are negative implications calling it the global genocide (Huff, 2011). The debate over regulatory channels and science and technology should not be yielded to public consumers. Rather, corporate social responsibility is the ethical duty of corporations and individuals who make singular decisions about whether to proceed with questionable, faulty, or harmful products. The harshest penalties for corporations and executives in charge must be administered when deception and products pushed to market have occurred. There are clear and ethical implications indicate the ethical responsibility of doing business, as well as when complacent manufacturing practices continually occur. Retribution for such egregious violations of unethical activity in corporations and organizations must come to public attention and be given transparency and full disclosure. This will ensure safety to all stakeholders and prevent ethical issues from arising.
Willis 6
Gostick, 2005). As ethics becomes a more important focus to organizations, it is imperative to ensure that filling jobs is not performed unconsciously. The act of hiring persons of virtuous character and integrity will significantly establish an ethical baseline. It seems that a main problem with ethics is complacency because of the pressures of societal conformity. However, the systemic influence of conformity has had a powerful impact on how ethics is portrayed through channels such as with media, distorting and corrupting the foundations of ethics in peoples minds. This is one possible reason for such complacency in individuals actions; since media is fictitious however, there are no real consequences, yet unethical decisions have caused very real outcomes affecting very real lives. The effects of media are contrasted by the ethical dilemmas created when someone does the right thing or blow the whistle. In such cases, correcting unethical situations may result in causing harm, damage, or negative retribution in individuals work and personal lives. Thus, the conflict of dealing with ethical dilemmas causes people to act in a complacent manner, as well as lack the courage to step up and say anything. Hence, control and fear diminish peoples ability to take the necessary actions when unethical situations are presented and when it comes time to report or correct such ethical violations that they may in fact know of. Blowing the whistle or reporting ethics violations is sometimes seen as a lack of naysayers loyalty to ones company. Some employees condemn and frown upon those who do report ethical violations, and these employees remain work-loyal and ethically complacent. Unethical corporations, companies, or people want others to think that it is bad to tell the truth. In creating coercive and also passive employees, companies may continue to act unethically. There are however many protections to whistle blowers in the event of reporting to ensure their anonymity and legal protection.
Final Thoughts
A final thought on ethics, is that whether a person knows what is ethical or not, does not mean that they will always do what is right, or make a necessary call-out so that proper actions can take place to address ethical issues. This was apparent through the class, in some cases, as many of my peers did not want to answer the hard questions about what they would do in hypothetical ethics situations. People may be informed of, and apprised of ethics, and ethical behavior within their organizations; as well know commonly established ethical standards and laws of our society, but this does not always inform the decision process of individuals and their corresponding actions. Doing what is ethically right takes courage, but ultimately ethical decisions lay in the hands of the individuals choosing, to make the right choices.
Works Cited
Bradsher, Keith. China Begins Inquiry Into Tainted Baby Formula . 12 September 2008. Website. 26 March 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/13/world/asia/13milk.html>.
Willis 7
Burritt, Chris. Lowes to Close 20 U.S. Stores, Slow North American Openings. 17 October 2011. Website. 26 March 2012. <http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-10-17/lowe-s-to-close-20-u-s-storesslow-north-american-openings.html>. Eilperin, Juliet. Harmful Teflon Chemical To Be Eliminated by 2015. 26 January 2006. Website. 26 March 2012. <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2006/01/25/AR2006012502041.html>. Ellis, David. Ex-BofA chief Lewis charged with fraud. 4 February 2010. Website. 26 March 2012. <http://money.cnn.com/2010/02/04/news/companies/bank_of_america/index.htm>. Hodock, Calvin. "Honest Innovation." Business Ethics. New york: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2012. 98-101. Book. Holland, Joshua. Wal-Mart's 'China Price'. 7 November 2007. Website. 26 March 2012. <http://www.alternet.org/module/printversion/27829>. Huff, Ethan A. Monsanto, GMOs, and the global genocide of science and humanity. 11 October 2011. Website. 26 March 20122. <http://www.naturalnews.com/033936_Monsanto_genocide.html>. Kadlec, Daniel, et al. Enron: Who's Accountable? 13 Janurary 2002. Website. 26 March 2012. <http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1001636,00.html>. La Roche, Julie. Martha Stewart Back Finally On The Board After Five-Year SEC Ban. 11 September 2011. Website. 26 March 2012. <http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-0928/wall_street/30211763_1_sam-waksal-stock-sale-imclone>. Lenzner, Robert. Bernie Madoff's $50 Billion Ponzi Scheme. 12 December 2008. Website. 26 March 2012. McCoy, Bowen H. "The Parable of the Sadhu." Business Ethics. Ed. John E Richardson. 11/12. Vol. 23. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2012. 23 vols. 66-71. Book.
Willis 8
Newsroom Americal Feeds. SEC Charges Three Mortgage Executives With Fraudulent Accounting Maneuvers in Midst of Financial Crisis. 13 March 2012. Website. 26 March 2012. <http://www.newsroomamerica.com/story/224607/sec_charges_three_mortgage_executives_with _fraudulent_accounting_maneuvers_in_midst_of_financial_crisis.html>. REI. Pay & Benefits Total Rewards at REI. 2012. Website. 26 March 2012. <http://www.rei.com/jobs/pay.html>. . REI's Culture & Values. 2012. Website. 26 March 2012. <http://www.rei.com/jobs/culture.html>. Richardson, John E and Linnea Bernard McCord. "Trust in the Marketplace." Business Ethics. Vol. 23. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2012. 23 vols. 78-80. Book. Richardson, John E, ed. Business Ethics. 11/12. Vol. 23. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2012. 23 vols. Book. Sass, Jennifer Beth, Barry Castleman and David Wallinga. Vinyl Chloride: A Case Study of Data Suppression and Misrepresentation. 24 March 2005. Website. 26 March 2012. <http://ehp03.niehs.nih.gov/article/fetchArticle.action?articleURI=info%3Adoi %2F10.1289%2Fehp.7716>. Telford, Dana and Adrian Gostick. "Hiring Character." Business Ethics. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2012. 122-125. Book. USA Today. Best Buy is closing 50 stores after losing money. 2012. Website. 26 March 2012. <http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/earnings/story/2012-03-29/best-buy/53852802/1>. Verschoor, Curtis C. "High Rates of Misconduct at All Levels of Government." Business Ethics. Ed. John E Richardson. Vol. 23. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2012. 23 vols. 38-40. Book. WAL-MART: The High Cost of Low Price. Dir. Robert Greenwald. 2005. Film. Wells, Susan J. "Are You Too Family Friendly?" Business Ethics. Ed. John E Richardson. Vol. 23. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2012. 23 vols. 33-37. Book.