Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
But a number of factors threaten to destroy the progress that Uptown has
made, not the least of which is the proposed construction of 178 affordable
housing units in two towers on a 6-acre tract of prime real estate in the
center of the neighborhood. Couple that with a summer of extraordinarily
high gang violence and a still-unsuccessful battle with clearing the streets
of longtime resident, the homeless and mentally ill, and Uptown is watching
its dreams come crashing down.
The project now includes just the two towers of housing, an Aldi store and,
maybe, a Target.
“The plan has been so drastically changed that people in this community
became so concerned that this project was going off the track,” said
Katharine Boyda, the president of the Uptown Neighborhood Council.
“What happened to the vibrant retail? This was supposed to revitalize the
community and bring in investment,” said Boyda, who lives no more than
50 feet from the construction site.
Because Wilson Yard is part of a larger tax increment financing district, $52
million of the project’s cost is subsidized by the city, about a third of the
project’s $150-million price tag.
More than 2,000 residents signed a petition to halt construction at the site,
where the Aldi already sits. Fix Wilson Yard, a citizens group created to
protest the development, launched a campaign to put pressure on Holsten
and Ald. Helen Shiller (46th). Through neighborhood presentations, protests
and letter-writing campaigns, the group called for a reconsideration of the
development plan and “a competitive process to identify the highest and
best use for the TIF property.”
Officials ignored the public outcry, Boyda said, and last week Fix Wilson
Yard filed a lawsuit against the city, claiming TIF abuses and violations of
the Open Meeting Law.
Thomas Ramsdell, the attorney representing Fix Wilson Yard, said the
case could lead to more accountability for the use of TIFs, what he called
“the mayor’s slush fund.”
“This is the first of its kind in that citizens are taking on the City of Chicago
over TIFs,” Ramsdell said. “This is a landmark challenge and it’s coming at
a time when TIFs are under serious review.”
The lawsuit claims the 2001 creation of the Wilson Yard TIF district violates
the Illinois TIF Act’s “but for” test.
“Without the TIF money, would economic resurgence take place? Basically,
‘but for’ the TIF funds, would development happen?” said Boyda.
Tom Tresser, a Lincoln Park resident and activist for TIF reform, signed
the Fix Wilson Yard petition because he supports standing up against
rampant TIF abuses.
“They’ve got to do it. There’s no other way. The city isn’t reviewing this and
the planning commission is appointed by Mayor Daley, the City Council
doesn’t say boo to Mayor Daley. It’s up to the citizen groups to do it,”
Tresser said.
In 2007, Chicago had 155 TIF districts, totaling more almost $560 million in
TIF revenue, according to the Cook County Clerk’s 2007 Taxpayers’ TIF
Revenue Summary.
“It takes a lot of work to go into the community and explain this financing to
people but it needs to be done. It’s a challenge. It makes people’s eyes
glaze over but it’s their money and people care about their money,” Tresser
said.
But on the ground in Uptown, the real problem is fear of what mid-rise
towers of low-income housing will do to the community.
“The mixed use Wilson Yard project is, I strongly believe, a linchpin to
revitalizing the Uptown area, particularly in this strapped economy. I think
the area would greatly benefit in manifold ways from a Target, theaters,
shops and integrated housing. Adding only low income housing is limiting
and suggests, I'm afraid, further crime in that area,” Goulah said in an
email.
But affordable housing activists argue that the glut of condo conversions
left a need for housing available to low-income residents. Foreclosures by
landlords have only exacerbated a problem that was already becoming a
crisis.
Shiller prefers the term affordable to describe the housing, not low-income.
“The [Chicago Housing Authority] won’t rent to people who earn more than
30 percent of median [Chicago area] income. This project will rent to
people with 30 percent, 50 percent and 80 percent of median income,” she
told the Chicago Sun-Times in 2006.
“We are at this point not because we wanted to do it but because the city at
every turn refused to do anything. We had no choice,” said Boyda. “No
matter what we did, the city was going to say, ‘We don’t care about you or
your community.’ What this has become is completely contrary to what was
supposed to happen and I have to assume the vibrant, thriving retail will
never happen. Someone had to take the lead and say, ‘This can’t keep
going on.’”
Bendersky is convinced the Wilson Yard project can be fixed, putting the
community back on track to becoming the next must-be place for Chicago.