Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
HDPE TO VLDPE
LLOYD w.
PEBSWORTH
DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY
uSI CHEMICALS
Prepared for presentation at the 1987 annual AIChE Meeting November 15-20, 1987 Recent Process Developmens in Olefin Polymerization
INTRODUCTION
Production of polyethylene in high pressure stirred Reports autoclaves using Ziegler type catalyst is not new. A of this type synthesis date back as Far as two decades. renewed interest in improving the versatility of existing autoclave systems has occurred with the commercialization of fluidized bed LLDPE production. This is evidenced by the increasing number of patents issued in this area and by the recent commercial production and licensing activities.
The
encroachment of
LLDPE
in many
traditional
LDPE
markets
displacement of many products. In the past cyclic demands accentuated by periodic overcapacity of various types of polyethylenes has shown a need for a "universal" process that could provide "swing" capabilities. Conversion of existing autoclave reactors to swing units can relieve these problems. The purpose of this paper is to give a brief summary of the results of retrofitting an existing commercial scale autoclave polyethylene reaction system for the production of a universal range of polyethylene homopolymers and copolymers. Retrofit systems generally use coordination metal catalysts
has
in slow growth
and even
resulted
and
1-olefin
densities
in
g./c.c.
The
system
described
here
capability
0.87
of producing
polymers
g./c.c.
to 0.96
from
g./c.c.
polyethylene range
products.
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
basic changes needed for retrofit operation. Note that the compression, reaction, recycle, and product collection steps remain basically the
Figure
1
summarizes
the
same.
The
catalyst system
has
The
been modified to
permit injection
of
catalyst slurry.
is necessary
necessary to prevent
system
to
provide
the
proper
concentration of
catalyst.
will depend on the settling rate of the catalyst. Catalyst particle size and thevpresence or absence of prepolymerization are important factors in selecting circulation rate.` Centrifical pumps with mechanical seals and The seal flush have proven to be adequate for this Job. dilution is varied depending on catalyst activity, catalyst
Circulation rate
capacity. The same positive displacement pumps used in free radical polymerization are used here. The cocatalyst system utilizes the existing injection pumps and feed tanks. The system is designed to
demand,
and
injection
provide precontact of the catalyst with cocatalyst if necessary otherwise the cocatalyst is injected directly to the reactor. A deactivation system is needed to avoid post reaction.
It should be noted that deactivation is conducted in the last reactor zone where stirring is utilized to disperse the deactivator. Further mixing occurs during pressure letdown. The deactivator which also acts as a neutralizer is fed to
Care is taken in suspension. the deactivator storage tank to exclude all oxygen by inert gas Addition of a positive displacement purge and padding. pump was necessary to accomplish deactivator addition. are done Data collection, and process calculations
the reactor
as
collodial
computer used has an The computerized system. industrially proven set of real-time system software. The data acquisition hardware is accessed from the ANSI/IEEE-583 Standard for Computer Automated measurement and control This permitted in-house development of software in (CAMAC). A total of 215 points were monitored. In-process FQRTRAN.
using
calculations performed
A
by
listed in Figure
A
2.
system is needed for melt index control. column is needed to assure that mineral
simple
spirits,
catalyst dilution
The
and system
existing gas chromatographs were converted to measure The comonomer, diluent and hydrogen in the reactor feed. existing analog controllers with minor modifications were used existing modifier pumps were used The for process control. for comonomer injection.
Additional control of temperature and fresh feed addition point in the flash _gas compresson system was needed to
minimize comonomer knockout.
Facilities for
necessary if product
the addition of
an
inert diluent
are
is to be densitiy below 0.923 g./c.c. made without excessive comomomer knockout in the low pressure C2 fractionator an existing recycle system. Ethane from
U
ethane/propane cracking unit was used. The need for this system will be detailed later. A high pressure recycle adsorber has been added to the The system to scavenge poisons from the system. entire reactor feed is treated by routing the primary compressor discharge to upstream of the adsorbtion vessel which is located in the high pressure recycle system. System "dry out" is rapid at a total system recycle every six minutes. A combination adsorber bed of 13X molecular sieves and activated alumina is currently used. A more complete description of the process may be found in U.S. Patent No. 4,558,105.
bottom
in
an
SYSTEM CAPABILITIES
controlled
by
adding butene-1
comonomer
desired product density is in the range of 0.925 to 0.926 g./c.c. When the desired product density is in the range of 0.87 to 0.925 g./c.c. ethane is added to the reaction system inlorder to change the butene to ethylene ratio. The resulting
the
with this ratio and with the incorporation characteristics of the specific catalyst. This relationship for three catalyst types is given in Figure 3. The use of ethane as diluent lowers the dew point of the
product density
varies
flash
loss of butene in this system. The use of ethane also lowers the density of the suction feed to the secondary compression system and therefore
gas feed and thus avoids knockout
or
avoids over pressure of the compressor first stage discharge. Figure 4 illustrates the effect of ethane addition on product density. The maximum density achieved was 0.960 g./c.c. This density value indicates the presence of a short chain branching level higher than that observed in solution and slurry produced HDPE. The cause for this higher branching frequency has not been firmly established. Dimerization of ethylene to butene-1 in the presence of hydrogen was shown to be the cause in one case. Some free radical polymerization is also suspected.
,
Melt Index
adjusting the level of hydrogen in the system. Melt index is also influenced by the reaction temperature and of course the catalyst type.
by
Figure
illustrates
index
relationship
Restrictions to stay below the stintering temperature, imposed on fluidized bed systems, does not exist for the retrofit system. As a result there is virtually no reactor restrictions on the production of low viscosity, low density products. Wide viscosity transitions can be made
in
very
short times.
1
to
35
in
less than
Reactor
Deactivation and Neutralization Deactivatlon and neutralization is accomplished ln one step within the reactor. The last zone of a three zone reactor Stirring in the deactivation zone is utilized for this step. utilizes a turbine type mixer to disperse the deactivating and
neutralizing agent. Deactivation is accomplished by injecting a collodial suspension on a Hydrotalcite like material in mineral spirits.
Deactlvation occurs in the following manner:
Mgu.5A1.12<oH>13co3
H20 + Hcx.
---- >
Mg4.5AI..l2(OH)13Cl2
51120 +
co;
present in the Hydrotalcite first reacts with the chloride containing catalyst to produce HCI. Deactivation is achieved in this step. The.released HCl exchanges with water and CO2 of the Hydrotalcite to produce a chloride containing insoluble salt which is stable up to a temperature of 842F (723K). Neutralization occurs in this
The
water
second step.
advantages over alkaline earth metal salts in that the product of neutralization and deactivation is undesirable stable and therefore will not contribute to is limited by System corrosion downstream reactions. neutralization immedlately following the reaction step. Details of this method of deactivation are covered in U.S.
Hydrotalcite has
Patent
4,634,744.
Product Quality
Conventional
LLDPE made on
the
retrofitted autoclave
has
superior optical properties to that of LLDPE made on the fluidized bed reactors. Tests to date indicate that the autoclave products are less heterogenous and therefore have improved optical properties. Figure 6 compares film grade products made via autoclave, fluidized bed, and a solution
process.
Absence
of
in combination
with
catalyst activity results in a clean high density product which is free from silica nucleated gels which are often a problem in slurry and fluidized bed processes.
high
Swing Capacity
With
LLDPE
to
transition
from
HDPE
to
matter of hours. Transition back to conventional LDPE production has been achieved in less than 24 hours. With additional equipment modification this can be reduced even further.
in
a
PROCESS ECONOMICS
to
Retrofit Costs
The
capital
investment
needed
for
retrofit
of
an
autoclave reactor is substantially less than that needed for the construction of a new gas phase unit. Conversion of the synthesis train is projected to take 10 to 15 million U.S.dollars. This cost will vary depending on sophistication of the product handling system and the feed stock
8
existing
.2
treating system. The ability to handle VLDPE downstream of Feed stock quality the reactor _requires special equipment. will determineithe extent of special equipment needed for feed Both of these variables are also factors in treatment. installing a gas phase process. The ability to use cocatalyst as
a
retrofit process
with lower
quality
Power Requirements
Much ado has been made
as
compared
and
value added for the products made play a much more important Power costs partvin unit profitability than power costs. must be considered from several different prospectives. Total electrical power requirements forran autoclave reactor in conventional production breaks down to about 2 cents per pound of product at a conversion rate of about 13$ of the This compares with a cost monomer per pass through the reactor. of about 1.1 cents per pound for fluidized bed production. It has been demonstrated that the retrofitted autoclave can
operate
acceptable product at a pressure of Operation at this lower pressure will result 12000 psig. This will in a decrease of power costs of about 25%. reduce the power requirements to about 1.5 cents per pound. The conversion rate for the autoclave can be increased by lowering the feed gas temperature utilizing waste heat recovery refrigeration unit. in combination with an adsorbtion
and produce
Lowering
of
the
feed
gas temperature
will result ln an increase in conversion of about 1,21 per pass. This represents an additional savings in compression cost of about 91. The total power costs would be At this reduced to about 1.3 cents per pound of product. point the lower costs of pelletizing a molten stream versus a particle stream will bring the costs to near equality.
70F (29MK)
Time
for Conversion
The
conversion of the reaction system can be made with a minimum of process interruption. With proper planning most equipment can be installed without interruption of the conventional process. Down time for tie-ins has been demonstrated to be about three weeks. Installation of special product handling equipment will take longer. Conventional hot melt handling equipment can process retrofit product in the density range of 0.960 to 0.900 g./c.c. without modification
provided sufficient extruder power is available.
fluidized bed system will result in a very rapid rise in power requirements due to the required low conversion rates. This is due to the fact that the reactor temperature must be maintained below the stintering temperature of the product being synthesized if reactor
Production of
VLDPE
in
fouling is to be avoided. Figure 7 illustrates the magnitude of this problem. It should be noted that at a product density of 0.880 g./c.c. the softening point of the polymer is below 3220K or 120F. It is estimated that a production rate cut of more than 50% will be needed if reactor fouling in a fluidized bed is to be avoided. In VLDPE production the
10
retrofitted autoclave is the more efficient user of power. For the retrofitted autoclave the only limitation will be the melt index/temperature relationship of the catalyst.
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
Tailoring of the Nata Ziegler catalysts for operation at higher pressure and temperature is still much in the development stage. With the flexibility of this type catalyst considerable progress can be expected in improving reactivity, comonomer selectivity, and temperature/polymer molecular weight
relationships.
-Development of
catalyst
incorporation of propylene along the polymer chain is expected to give a product with superior properties. This development would result in a substantial decrease in production cost if propylene could be substituted for butene-1 as comonomer. Useqof reactor temperature zoning in conventional LDPE production is well established. Application of these techniques to retrofit production isqsure to lead to a very versatile system. low temperature in one zone and high By operating at temperature in the second zone products with a bimodal Use of molecular weight distribution can be produced. different selective catalysts in each zone can enhance these
differences.
temperature profiling to improve long conversion rate while maintaining product viscosity, used in conventional polymerization, may well be used to enhance productivity, improve film grade optical properties, and
Use
of
reaction
ll
,-- e
with very low Control of oligomers, a potential problem achieved in the retrofitted density polymers, is more easily First variation of high pressure recycle separation system. of will result in some control of the amount conditions Since the product enters in the product.
oligomers remaining
the
low
pressure separator
of
application
accomplished.
Lower
devolitizing
reinjection of the comonomer would permit the use hand higher pressure of higher 1-olefin comonomers. On the other melt index/temperature and can enhance the activity
knockout and
relationship
of some
potential advantages of
12
\ 212
*
LEGENDgFOR FIGURE
10 12
1M
16
20
21a 216
22
2Ua 24D
25a
25D
26 27 29
32
34b
3&c
35 36 37 40 42
43
44 46 50
51 53
5M
58 60 62 64 66 70
72
Catalyst Mix Tank Catalyst Circulation Pump Deactivator Injection Pump Catalyst Injection Pump Cocatalyst Feed Tank Cocatalyst Injection Pump Cocatalyst Injection Pump Deactivator Feed Tank Deactivator Injection Pump Product Cooler High Pressure Separator First High Pressure Recycle Cooler Second High Pressure Recycle Cooler First High Pressure Recycle Knockout Pot Third High Pressure Recycle Cooler Second High Pressure Recycle Knockout Pot Fourth High Pressure Recycle Cooler
Adsorber Adsorber Discharge
Reactor Reactor Top Zone Reactor Middle Zone Reactor Bottom Zone Makeup Ethylene Supply Line First Stage Primary Suction Drum Second Stage Primary Suction Drum Primary Compressor First Stage Primary Compression Second Stage Primary Compression Primary Compressor Kickback Cooler First Stage Primary Discharge Cooler Second Stage Primary Discharge Cooler Secondary or Hyper Compressor First Stage Secondary Compression Second Stage Secondary Compression First Stage Secondary Discharge Cooler Second Stage Secondary Discharge Cooler Comonomer Injection Line Secondary Compressor to Reactor Feed Line Ratio Modifier Injection Line Flash Gas Compressor First Stage Flash Gas Compression Second Stage Flash Gas Compression Third Stage Flash Gas Compression First Stage Flash Gas Knockout Pot Second Stage Flash Gas Knockout Pot Third Stage Flash Gas Knockout Pot First Stage Flash Gas Cooler Second STage Flash Gas Cooler Third Stage Flash Gas Cooler Hydrogen Injection Line
74
Filter
Continued
Adsorber Discharge
LPS LPS
Filter
Pump
82
85
86
FIGURE 2
DATA COLLECTION
VIA COMPUTER
ANSI/IEEE-583
STANDARD
CAMAC
215
DATA
POINTS
HO
ALARM
POINTS
INPROCESS CALCULATIONS
CATALYST
PRODUCTIVITY
RATE
CATALYST ADDITION
G. C. OUTPUT
MONOMER
RATIO
SET POINT
INJECTION RATE
SET POINT
DEACTIVATOR RATE
ENERGY
EXTRUDER
SPECIFIC
PRODUCTION RATE
FIGURE
960
950
940
930
920
910
C.C.
900
890
C B
aeo`
0{5
1.0
1.5
2.0
'2.5
FIGURE 4
ETHANE VS. PRODUCT DENSITY
960
BUTENE/ETHYLENE
950
940
930
920
910
900
BUTENE/ETHYLENE/ETHANE
890
880
I
'TI
1.0
1.4
1.2
0.8
WT. RATIO,
I 6.6
BUTENE/ETHYLENE
I
o 2
-I
0
'o.4
FIGURE 5
10
9 8 7 6
5 4
'_v
I/
Cf
__
iff
'_v
I I ff'
QE
8|7|5
6`rF-
r-
.1
0.910
g./c.c.
410 (483) 420
<4B9>
_I
360 (455)
L _.I
380
<4ee>
OF
L
390 (472)
(OK)
370
<4@1>
400
(478)
FIGURE 6
TETRQEITTE
EEEIDIZED
ESEETQN
HAZE
GLOSS
CLARITY
FILM INDEX*
IMPACT STRENGTH
PUNCTURE
IMPACT STRENGTH
TEAR
PROCESSING
*LACK OF
FILM IMPERFECTIONS
OR
GELS
FIGURE 7
260 (400)
I"
I
C
A
240 (389)
T
S
O
220 (378)
F
T
E
200 (366)
I
N G
180 (355)
Y?
o
I
N
160 (344)
OF
K)
140 (333)
120 (322)
100 (311)
_.I
.95 .94 .93 .92
POLYMER
_L
89
.91
90
88
DENSITY,
g./c.c
FIGURE 8
LOW
RETROFIT COST
IN
SI.TU DEACTIVATION
PRODUCTS WITH
NO
MAY
BE MADE
MAY
BE
USED
LOW
GOOD
OPTICAL PROPERTIES
POWER
DRAW
LOWEST
REMELT FOR
NOT
REOUIRED