Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
I never thought about being an interracial couple before...like it wasnt a problem [before I transitioned] because everyone read me as white. Scout (a working-class Latino/white queer transman)
The process of developing a sense of self not only involves individuals self-concepts, but also others perceptions of them and whether or not these align. In the case of transgender individuals (transpeople), their gender self-concept may not match what others assign to them; thus, others conrmation (often referred to as passing) is a powerful force. For many transpeople who make use of hormones and/or surgeries to transition (change genders), the resulting changes in physical features signicantly impact how others perceive them and often further their ability to pass as the new gender. However, socialization into a new gender also includes learning the various ways that race, social class, and sexuality inform the meanings others
Direct all correspondence to Kylan Mattias de Vries, Department of Social Sciences, Policy, and Culture Southern Oregon University, 1250 Siskiyou Blvd, Ashland, OR 97520; e-mail: devriesk@sou.edu.
Symbolic Interaction, Vol. 35, Issue 1, pp. 4967, ISSN: 0195-6086 print/1533-8665 online. 2012 Society for the Study of Symbolic Interaction. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1002/SYMB.2
50
draw upon in relation to their gender presentation. Race, class, gender, and sexuality combine in specic ways such that others attribute these various combinations to transpeople in interaction, therefore inuencing how transpeople see themselves. This can unexpectedly complicate the emergence of the new self through transition. Drawing on ethnographic data primarily with transpeople of color, I analyze the intersected identity frames, or the ways that race, social class, gender, and sexuality all intersect to create specic background identities that others attribute to individuals to frame their interaction (Goffman 1974). We can better understand these intersected identity frames through the post-transition experiences of transpeople who engage in identity management. The meanings others attach to specic combinations are foregrounded in the context of transitioning, and these interactions take place in a larger context as well; some interactions occur with others who employ dominant, white cultural narratives, while other audiences draw upon ethnic cultural narratives. In all cases, transitioning throws the multi-dimensionality of enacted identity into sharp relief against the background of intersecting social and cultural structural arrangements. This article also demonstrates an intersectional analysis that illustrates the complexity of these frames, the resourcefulness of social actors, and how these frames are enacted in social interaction. The focus of this research is to examine the lived experience of transpeople in relation to changing, experiencing, and performing multiple intersecting identities. My ndings may not apply to all self-identied transpeople. However, this research gives insight into the ways the transpeople I interviewed experience and perform multiple dimensions of identity. Through the stories of their experiences, we also garner information on the ways people more broadly draw upon dominant and ethnic cultural denitions to attribute specic intersected identity frames to each other in interaction. Researchers have utilized transpeople as key informants in the examination of the social construction of gender (e.g., Kessler and McKenna 1978; Lorber 1994; Valentine 2007; for a sampling see Stryker and Whittle 2006) and gender identity (see Dozier 2005; Gagne, Tewksbury and McGaughey 1997; Garnkel 1967; Kessler and McKenna 1978; Mason-Schrock 1996; Rubin 2003); however, scholars have yet to fully consider the other dimensions of identity that transitioning can make salient and/or problematic. To date, research on transpeople is mostly composed of data gathered from white, middle-class individuals; when transpeople of color are included, the focus still remains on gender (Stryker 2006). More recently, some scholars have interrogated the signicance of intersecting social identities, such as race, sexuality, class, height, and age (Dozier 2005; Koyama 2006; Schilt 2006). Dozier (2005) makes a key contribution to our understanding about the connection between gender and the body and the ways the sex (male/female) attributed by others onto a transperson affects the social interaction by inuencing how others perceive and thus gender their behavior. While Schilt (2006) focuses on the workplace, she expands Doziers ndings and notes how other markers (e.g., race, height, age, and sexuality) intersect with gender. These markers inuence
Intersectional Identities
51
the social identity attributed to a transperson and the ways others change their interactions and meanings attributed to behaviors. Both Dozier and Schilt highlight the importance of interrogating whiteness and further exploring intersectional analysis when considering gender. My ndings further support those of Dozier and Schilt and demonstrate the impact of others attributions to interaction. Most participants in this study shared their initial surprise in discovering the inuence of others changing perceptions of their race, class, and sexuality in relation to their gendered social identity. Another unexpected shift was in how these intersections changed their social visibilitythe extent to which others acknowledged their presenceand how they learned to incorporate, manage, and/or challenge this. The self, or an individuals overarching self-concept, is composed of numerous identities. Snow and Anderson (1987) conceptualize these as social identitieswhat others attribute to individuals to situate themand personal identitiesa persons self-meanings or self-image. Identity is a negotiation process (Altheide 2000). An individual may or may not self-identify with the imposed social identity; nevertheless, they learn to manage (Goffman 1959, 1963) or negotiate (Strauss 1978) it. Moreover, master narratives from the dominant group inuence aspects of identity that others attribute to individuals (including transpeople) and themselves in interaction (McCorkel and Myers 2003). The social structural systems of gender, race, and class develop in relation to each other and affect individual understandings about gender, racial, and class identities (Butler 2003; Glenn 1999). Some scholars argue that gender is more than a social or personal identity; gender attribution serves as an anchor or background identity (Ridgeway and Correll 2004; Stone 1962; West and Zimmerman 1987). The perceived gender (social identity) of the other in relation to the perceived gender of oneself inuences interaction (Fausto-Sterling 2000; Kessler and McKenna 1978; Thorne 1997). Howard (2000) challenges this single dimensions of social identities approach, since it fails to account for the ways femininity and masculinity are hierarchical, dened as white, middle class, and heterosexual in the United States (Collins 2000; Connell 2005; Goffman 1963). Some scholars argue that racial identity is a master status (Hughes 1945), particularly for non-whites in the United States. Omi and Winant (1994) illustrate how others draw on meanings attached to physical appearance in order to attribute racial identity to individuals. Stryker (1980) suggests certain identities, like racial identity, are more salient in given situations. This creates some conict. For instance, scholars dispute whether gender identity or racial identity is more salient for women of color. Many black feminist scholars directly oppose this either/or thinking, and suggest that women of color experience both/and, multiple oppressions/jeopardies, or intersectionality; they experience a racialized gendered identity in interaction (Collins 2000; Crenshaw 1991; Glenn 1999). Purdie-Vaughns and Elbach outline a model of intersectional invisibility, a phenomenon resulting from ethnocentrism, androcentrism, and heterocentrism:
52
three ideologies in which a dominant groups perspective and experience achieves hegemony, becoming dened as the social standard (2008:38081). With this in mind, I argue that individuals draw upon ideologies of the dominant group, and within specic cases ethnic cultural narratives, construct intersected identity frames which they attribute to others in interaction. All of these dimensions of social structure and identity are interrelated, and the way these combine and the meanings of these combinations are all inuenced by hegemonic narratives. In what follows, I consider the range of intersected identity frames attributed by others to transpeople. First, however, I briey discuss my research methods.
METHODS
As an active member in various online transgender communities and a previous participant in local transgender groups, I hold what Loand et al. (2006) term an insider role. Upon receiving approval, I began snowball sampling to recruit participants via conferences, online groups, and word of mouth. In order to gain access to spaces specic to transpeople of color and to reach stealth individuals (where others are unaware the person has transitioned), the call for participants included a full disclosure of my social location (a white queer working-class transguy raised in Canada) and my research interest in learning about the experience of transpeople of color. I also provided opportunities for potential participants to ask me about my research agenda and ask personal questions about my life. Often, the questions I received were based on countering bad experiences with other research projects; this is similar to Westons (2004) experience while studying lesbian and gay communities. I believe my openness to personal questions and my shared transgender identity made a difference in not only establishing rapport, but also in helping people feel more comfortable contributing. Additionally, several participants expressed their interest because this project dealt specically with transpeople of color. This study is part of a broader project based on extensive ethnographic data collected during 2005 to 2009 from self-identied transpeople, primarily of color, in the United States. My eldwork entailed traveling to the Southern, Midwestern, Western, and Southwestern states to conduct face-to-face interviews and attend conferences. The language used by participants is diverse and reects their unique self-concepts and the range of language and meanings within different communities. I attempt to be true to these distinctions while still emphasizing commonalities; therefore, Table 1 presents participants identiers using their language. The data include thirty-one in-depth, open-ended, semi-structured interviews, and hundreds of hours of informal interviews and participant observation at conferences, social activities, planning committees, and numerous online groups. The formal interviews lasted from one to three and a half hours and were conducted in a place chosen by the participant, ranging from individuals homes, to restaurants, to vehicles. My interview techniques varied but primarily included a conversational approach, open and closed questions, and interviewing by comment (Snow,
Pseudonym
Ethnosexual gender
Josie
Ebonyqueen
Intersectional Identities
Katrice
Jean
Jackie
Trent Jake
Chance
Joe
Romello Attracted to men Gay/uid Queer/uid Hetero/uid Hetero/uid Queer/uid BA Trade school Some college BA Undergrad 21 21 46 33 28 Grad school 28
Fluid
AA
24
2 5 13 2 5 4 7
Nonprot Student Writer Student Hormones, top surgery Hormones, top surgery Took hormones for 1 year Software industry Mechanic Nonprot
Thoth
Andreas Bazil
Middle-class, African American woman Middle-class, African American woman Middle-class, African American woman Middle-class, African American woman Middle-class, African American woman, intersex Working-class, Black man Upper middle-class, African American man Working-class, Black transguy Working-class, Black transguy, female-bodied man Working-class, African American man Working-class, Black FTM, Tboi Poor, African American man Working-class, Black/Native American queer transPOC Middle-class, Black man Working-class, Latino Working-class, Latino/white FTM
53
54
TABLE 1. Continued
Sexuality Hetero Queer/uid Two-spirit Queer/uid Hetero/uid Grad school 39 915 Hormones, top surgery some college 24 5 Hormones, top surgery Tech School 28 3 Hormones, top surgery Electrician Farm coop Trade worker In law school BA 29 31 5 2 Hormones, top surgery Hormones Court investigator Artist Education Age Yrs Out Medicalization Occupation
Pseudonym
Ethnosexual gender
Jacobo Dante
BennyBoy
Diego
Lance
Transdyke
BA
23
Student Student
Scout
Craig Henry Lesbian Bisexual Bi (more hetero) Lesbian Questioning/queer Fluid BA/BS Masters Some college BA/BS 35 22 25 49 BA/BS 36 12+ 512 6 2 10 College 22 26
Queer/uid Queer/uid
32 25
14+ 2
Hormones, top surgery Hormones, top surgery Hormones Hormones, surgeries Hormones, surgeries Hormones, bottom surgery Hormones Hormones, surgeries
Remrie
Miranda
Amber
Laura
Elle Nici
Middle-class, Latino Upper middle-class, South East Asian guy, transguy Working-class, Bakla (Filipino/Puerto Rican) Working-class, Puerto Rican & white FTM Working-class, Mixed-heritage (Native American, Lakota, white) intersex man Middle-class, Multi-racial (white & Chicana) Working-class, Multi-racial (Cuban, white-Jewish) genderqueer transman Working-class, white transmale Upper middle-class, white transman Poor, white transgender woman Middle-class, Korean (rst gen) woman, intersex Middle-class, Chinese (fourth gen) female Upper middle-class, Asian female Middle-class, Chinese female Middle-class, Chinese feminine
Intersectional Identities
55
Zurcher and Sjoberg 1982). My engagement of humor and sharing of personal information and resources assisted in building rapport. Although I brought an interview guide, I maintained exibility and included time for participants to move beyond the initial scope of my questions. This allowed me to better understand the lived experiences of each participant. I was interested in transpeoples identity workthe processes of creating meanings they attributed to themselves and others. Therefore, I asked participants how they constructed their conceptions of self and identity and how they addressed specic interactions with others. My interview guide focused on ve broad areas: self-identication; interactions with family and friends; perceptions, experiences, and presentation of self in relation to interactions with others (i.e., acquaintances, strangers); perceptions, experiences, and presentation of self in relation to specic communities (e.g., religious, transgender, academic, cultural); and perceptions, experiences, and presentation of self in relation to the medical community. I began my analysis by open coding through which I identied common concepts, themes, and issues with my research questions in mind. I took memos about my processes in terms of coding, theorizing, and analyzing (Strauss and Corbin 1990). Loand et al. emphasize the importance for qualitative researchers to memo about various coding categories and their interconnections, [as well as] . . . procedures and eldwork experiences (2006:209). Based on early emerging themes, I expanded my research by engaging in theoretical sampling (Strauss 1987). For instance, given the low initial response from Asian American transpeople, I identied several blogs of people who identied as trans and Asian American (Chinese American, Korean American, Japanese American, etc.) and emailed them directly with the call. I then engaged in a more focused coding (Emerson, Fretz, and Shaw 1995); this entailed using initial codes to create categories and subcategories. I compared these categories against each other to examine connections between them and explore the commonalities of transpeoples lived experiences. Interview participants include twelve predominately middle-class transwomen (individuals assigned male sex markers at birth, but who now identify as women, whether or not they have undergone hormone therapy and/or surgery), who were out (acknowledged) seven years on average, and nineteen mostly working-class transmen (individuals assigned female sex markers at birth, but who now identify as men), who were out an average of four and a half years. Participants are racially and ethnically diverse; they include thirteen black, two Latina/o, ve Asian American, one South East Asian, seven bi/multi-racial, and three white transpeople. Their ages range from twenty-one to fty-two with an average of thirty-two, and all had some college education (most participants had at least a bachelor degree). All but three participants indicate that their sexuality is uid or queer. This is due in part to their bodies not aligning with the gender with which they identify (e.g., a transman still having a vagina1 ); however, this is also a response to an understanding of the complexities of language and their acknowledgement of being attracted to a variety of types of people.
56
Two participants identied as poor, thirteen as working class, twelve as middle class, and four as upper middle class. Although a couple participants in their early twenties still identied with their family class status, the remaining based their class identication on their education level and nancial resources. Most participants easily identied their class status; however, in a few cases, participants were unsure if they would be classied as middle- or working class; this resulted in a dialogue about class status in the United States. I relied on Erdmans (2004), who denes the contemporary working class in the United States as those who typically obtain a high school education, often with some college or vocational education, earn over minimum wage, and, in healthy economies, live above the poverty line. In contrast, middle-class individuals tend to receive higher education, work in professional elds, and hold greater powereconomic power, political power (supervising the behavior of workers), and ideological power (dening the meaning of behavior, e.g., labeling manual work as undesirable) (p. 53). I veried that these denitions aligned with participants who self-identied as a specic class. The cultural narratives linking race with class signicantly inuenced participants intersected identity frame. For instance, others attributing a Latina/o social identity onto a participant entailed an assumption of them being working class. In what follows, I examine intersected identity frames in some detail. I begin by illustrating the racial and ethnic expectations within cultural narratives and how these intersect with gender, class, and sexuality. Next, I explore and examine the effects of these attributed intersected identity frames on transpeoples social identities.
Intersectional Identities
57
58
This is similar for Jacobo in the Latino community. Even for transpeople who maintain the same racial identity upon transitioning, the racial/ethnic meanings others attach to their gender are signicant and often vary from dominant, white cultural expectations. Jacobo explains how other Latinos treat him now: They give you your place as another male Latino, they wouldnt do that to another female. Similar to ethnically gendered expectations, others employ and challenge dominant cultural narratives around intersected identity frames.
Intersectional Identities
59
For Lance, learning to become a man is intimately connected to learning what it means to be white, middle class, and heterosexual, because these are the assumptions others place upon him. Many transmen spoke about their rst time being exposed to the sexualization of women in conversations with other men. Pascoe (2005) and Sanday (1990) note that the sexualization of women is an important part of mens homosocial spaces; however, how this is performed and the meanings associated with an individuals intersected identity frame vary by culture. For example, Bennyboy (working-class Bakla transman) reects on the following story about the cultural difference in the sexualization of women:
The other day . . . I was just sitting back actually watching [a conversation between workers on the job site]. It was sort of forty to sixty, forty being brown and sixty being white . . . some of the Mexican guys were talking about like seeing a woman, and hes like, oh yeah my tongue got hard you know, I saw her and my tongue got hard. . . . They always talk about going down on women and I would watch the white guys in the group and they would get like super uncomfortable, and it was all about like making her cum . . . versus like white guys talking about, . . . I got this girl to go down on me, you know I dont do shit for her. . . . Its all about . . . like for brown people being a man is more about how well you can please your partner versus how much you can get from them and not return it.
Cromwell (1999) and Rubin (2003) nd that some transmen perpetuate sexist behavior as a way of enacting masculinity. While this may be the case, the type of sexism and objectication of women that some transmen participate in may differ culturally as Bennyboy states here. Additionally, several participants share their rst encounters with this sexist homosocial behavior, their discomfort with this, and concern that their silence contributed to the interaction. Similar to Dozier (2005) and Schilts (2006) ndings, some participants share their desires to speak out against sexism, and how this involves active engagement with their masculine narrative. Participants quickly learn what it means to occupy an intersected identity frame in both dominant culture and racial and ethnic cultures. For Morgan (multi-racial transwoman) and Scout and Diego (mixed-race transmen) who lost their white identity, learning to be Latina/o includes gaining a sense of ethnic pride: The more and more I pass, the more I felt like I was [perceived] as a Hispanic male . . . and Im identifying with it more and more (Scout). For Lance, the loss in a racial identity is a signicant inuence on his sense of self and speaks to the powerful, yet silent, narrative surrounding middle-class, heterosexual, white men (Connell 2005). Lances cultural history and experiences were erased. Although emphasized femininity and hegemonic masculinity are currently sociopolitically dened as white, middle class, and heterosexual, this denition is uid (Connell 2005). Within dominant white culture, there are numerous subfemininities and submasculinities, often revolving around the conceptions of race/ethnicity, class, and sexuality. A key component for transpeople is learning these numerous gender expectations, the circumstances that others attributed these to them, and the ways to negotiate, integrate, or resist them.
60
Intersectional Identities
61
middle-class South Asian transguy) felt that his transition went smoothly. He wanted to become a gentle guy and reected on how he was not stigmatized like other transmen of color. Because Asian men are marked by others as nonthreatening (for the most part), they become socially invisible. For Dante, his class status and college education further conrmed for others that he was smart, nerdy, and safe. This perceived femininity and submissiveness of Asians is illustrated by a comment from a white transwoman to an Asian American transwoman:
[A]nother T[ransgender] friend of mine, who transitioned at the same time as me . . . shes white or Caucasian, and one of the biggest beefs she keeps giving me is, Youre Asian, that sucks, shut up, what do you have to complain about? Cause the general rule of thumb is that most Asians have an easier time transitioning. (Elle)
Media representations of black men oscillate between the nonthreatening black buddy to sexually deviant and violent men (Collins 2005). Representations of black women oscillate between images of being less beautiful, since they cannot meet the standards of white middle-class femininity, and being targeted as hypersexual (Collins 2005). The black transwomen in this study moved from high stigmatization as black men to lower social visibility. This may be because most of the black transwomen I interviewed are middle-aged and their age factors into the extent of social invisibility. The younger black transwomen I met at conferences expressed feeling that they were seen as more exotic.
62
rst-generation Korean transwoman) gives an example of the hypersexualization in being an Asian woman: I was at [company] . . . it was rumored that I was pregnant with a coworkers baby . . . I used to swear that Im not pregnant; I would be the rst one in shock if I was. Miranda felt the rumor started because of the strange Asian foods she ate (supposedly an indication of pregnancy food cravings), but that the sexualization of Asian women contributed to co-workers insisting on her affair. Although Asian transmen often move to a less socially visible category, other transmen indicate becoming more visible. In this case, the feminization of Asian men (Han 2009) decreased their social visibility, while the hypersexualized masculinity attributed to black and Latino men increased their social visibility. In some instances, this increase in visibility is connected to gaining what Schilt (2006) refers to as gender advantage, particularly for white transmen; however, the extent of gender advantage varies by race, social class, and height (Schilt 2006). Collins (2005) and Nagel (2003) outline the hypersexualization of men of color and the historical representations of them as sexually dangerous, especially to white women. Scout (mixed-race transman) explains, I never thought about being an interracial couple before. When I was with [white girlfriend] I would get looks . . . like, Why are you dating a white girl? When like it wasnt a problem [before transitioning] because everyone [perceived] me as white. Alejandro (a working-class Latino) provides an illustration of a specic heteronormative, working-class intersected identity frame:
I nd that people are scared of me; they see a dark eyed/haired non-Anglo man walking near them off the train at night and they are scared . . . . I am more scared of police who are always stopping me in my car . . . . I am scared when I go to clubs and things get heavy; I have been in [three] ghts. Being a Latino blue collar male I am seen as a trouble maker and Im not used to that.
Jacobo revealed similar experiences in terms of the way others connected his social class with being perceived as Latino. Even though others utilize normative denitions of middle class for most people, Latinos are often assumed to be poor or working class. To counter this stereotype, Jacobo deliberately wears suits and ties to his job and other places and events. People are surprised to see that Im a Latino male with a Bachelors degree and not involved in a gang (Jacobo). Even in a suit, working in the criminal justice eld, Jacobo is occasionally mistaken as a defendant, particularly by whites: I was in court one day with my suit and stuff . . . so a [white] guy said what are you here for . . . and I said, Actually Im with the defense team . . . Im probably representing you (laughing). As I exemplify above, men of color are also hypersexualized. In some cases, this involves representations as perpetrators, and in other cases, hypersexuality is exoticized, such as Dexters experience in being perceived as a Latin lover (see Rodrguez 1997). For Dexter, this hypersexualization is less dangerous than for the Asian American transwomen, but it is still disconcerting, particularly when he feels boxed into that role with partners. Dexters approach to this new sexualization is
Intersectional Identities
63
playful; he spoke of having fun with this identity by going to gay bars and playing on this exoticizing of Latinoness. Although Dexter makes light about his experiences, he is still concerned with how this hypersexualization will inuence future relationships and the potential for negative consequences when others perceive him as a threat. Collins (2005) nds working-class black men are more often portrayed in the media as perpetrators. As they begin to transition, several black transmen expressed concerns about becoming black men; I know that theres a stigma you know white America has of black men (Trent, working-class black transman). Jake states:
When I transitioned from being an African American woman, you know thats a double minority, to being an African American man, youre probably the scariest person in the United States of America. When I walk down the street, people walk to the other side so they dont have to be near me. When I walk through the mall they follow me around and make sure Im not stealing anything . . .
In Jakes example, we see how comparisons of who is more oppressed using the Double/Multiple Jeopardy model versus the Single Social Location Model do not accurately reect individuals lived experiences (Purdie-Vaughns and Elbach 2008). For Jake, his gain in gender advantage (moving from a double minority to a single subordinate position) is situationally muted by acquiring a more visibly stigmatized status as a black man. Similarly, Lance questions, Its like if youre female and youre seen as a person of color, what does that mean? Versus if youre seen as a man and a person of color? And whats less threatening? The increase in social visibility is related to dominant, white racist cultural narratives that others draw upon to assign specic intersected identity frames in interaction.
64
desire for more diverse voices to be made public, not only in terms of transcommunities, but within social science research focusing on transpeople as well. Although gendered meanings are signicant to transpeople and transnarratives, we often neglect how these are racialized, classed, and sexualized. Thus, as Stryker notes:
[T]he analytical framework for understanding gender diversity that has emerged from transgender studies . . . [is] inadequate for representing the complex interplay between race, ethnicity, and transgender phenomena. (2006:15)
The universalizing of transgender perpetuates a white and predominately middleclass transgender experience, identity, and collective (see also Valentine 2007). This research illustrates the importance of considering race, class, and sexuality when studying the transgender phenomenon. This article marks an important step toward an intersectional analysis of identities in interaction. Identity literature in sociological social psychology suggests that certain singular social identities are more salient for individuals, depending on the interaction. I attend to the ways race, social class, gender, and sexuality combine and are used to attribute specic intersected identity frames in interaction. This provides an empirical example of intersected identity frames and demonstrates an analysis that reveals the complexity of these frames, the creativity of social actors, and the numerous ways these play out in social interaction. Finally, I would like to emphasize three ways this research advances our understanding of identities in interaction. First, it demonstrates how people draw upon dominant and racial/ethnic cultural narratives about race, class, gender, and sexuality to identify, code, and frame their interactions with others. Second, it suggests ways people incorporate the intersected identity frame others attribute to them. For participants, this begins with learning about the new frame being attributed to them in a process of resocialization. In some cases, this new frame is identity conrming; in many cases, participants were surprised by some of the meanings attributed to them. For instance, the change in intersected identity frame experienced during and/or after transitioning sometimes results in transpeople gaining or losing social visibility. Once they learned these new frames, participants engaged in various management and negotiation techniques. Third, it illustrates the powerful inuence of attributed intersected identity frames on an individuals sense of self. For transpeople, successfully passing entailed understanding themselves through these attributions. I have sought to incorporate the more overarching meanings people attribute to each other in relation to race, class, gender, and sexuality in interaction. These meanings are not only experienced by transpeople; rather, transpeoples experiences illuminate the complex intersections of race, class, gender, and sexuality. While some audiences seem to employ dominant, white cultural narratives, others draw upon racial and ethnic cultural narratives. In all cases, transitioning throws the multi-dimensionality of intersected identity frames into sharp relief against the background of intersecting social and cultural structural arrangements.
Intersectional Identities
65
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I thank Jen Dunn, Rob Benford, SJ Creek, Megan Farnsworth, Carey Sojka, the anonymous reviewers, and editors for their helpful suggestions. I also thank the participants for sharing their stories with me.
NOTES
1. Many transmen online use different language to refer to female body parts. For example cubbyhole instead of vagina, and cock instead of clitoris. 2. Some transmen wish to maintain ties to specic womens communities. Also, some transmen conceive themselves as partially female-bodied; this contributes to some contention between butches and transmen in lesbian and queer communities (see Halberstam and Hale 1998).
REFERENCES
Altheide, David. 2000. Identity and the Denition of the Situation in a Mass-Mediated Context. Symbolic Interaction 23(1):127. Butler, Judith. 2003. Gender Trouble, Feminist Theory, and Psychoanalytic Discourse. Pp. 201211 in Identities: Race, Class, Gender, and Nationality, edited by L. Alcoff and E. Mendieta. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Inc. Chou, Rosalind S. and Joe R. Feagin. 2008. The Myth of the Model Minority: Asian Americans Facing Racism. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers. Collins, Patricia Hill. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. . 2005. Black Sexual Politics: African Americans, Gender, and the New Racism. New York: Routledge. Connell, R. W. 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. . 2005. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press. Crenshaw, Kimberle Williams. 1991. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review 43(6):124199. Cromwell, Jason. 1999. Transmen and FTMs: Identities, Bodies, Genders, and Sexualities. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Dozier, Raine. 2005. Beards, Breasts, and Bodies: Doing Sex in a Gendered World. Gender & Society 19(3):297317. Emerson, Robert M., Rachel L. Fretz, and Linda L. Shaw. 1995. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Erdmans, Mary Patrice. 2004. Looking for Angel: White Working-Class Women Lost between Identities. Race, Gender & Class 11(4):4862. Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books. Gagne, Patricia, Richard Tewksbury, and Deanna McGaughey. 1997. Coming Out and Crossing Over: Identity Formation and Proclamation in a Transgender Community. Gender & Society 11:478508. Garnkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Glenn, Evelyn Nakano. 1999. The Social Construction and Institutionalization of Gender and Race. Pp. 343 in Revisioning Gender, edited by M. M. Ferree, J. Lorber, and B. B. Hess. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
66
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday. . 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of a Spoiled Identity. London, UK: Pelican Books. .1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. London, UK: Harper and Row. Halberstam, Judith and C. Jacob Hale. 1998. Butch/FTM Border Wars: A Note on Collaboration. GLQ 4(2):283285. Han, Chong-suk. 2009. Asian Girls are Prettier: Gendered Presentations as Stigma Management among Gay Asian Men. Symbolic Interaction 22(2):106122. Howard, Judith A. 2000. Social Psychology of Identities. Annual Review of Sociology 26:367393. Hughes, Everett C. 1945. Dilemmas and Contradictions of Status. American Journal of Sociology 50(5):353359. Kessler, Suzanne J. and Wendy McKenna. 1978. Gender: An Ethnomethodological Approach. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Koyama, Emi. 2006. Whose Feminism Is It Anyway? The Unspoken Racism of the Trans Inclusion Debate. Pp. 698705 in The Transgender Studies Reader, edited by S. Stryker and S. Whittle. New York: Routledge. Lewis, Amanda E. 2004. What Group? Studying Whites and Whiteness in the Era of ColorBlindness. Sociological Theory 22(4):623646. Loand, John, David Snow, Leon Anderson, and Lyn H. Loand. 2006. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning. Lorber, Judith. 1994. Paradoxes of Gender. Binghamton, NY: Vail-Ballou Press. Loseke, Donileen R. 2007. The Study of Identity as Cultural, Institutional, Organizational, and Personal Narratives: Theoretical and Empirical Integrations. The Sociological Quarterly 48(4):661688. McCorkel, Jill A. and Kristen Myers. 2003. What Difference Does Difference Make? Position and Privilege in the Field. Qualitative Sociology 26(2):199231. Majors, Richard and Janet Mancini Billson. 1992. Cool Pose: The Dilemmas of Black Manhood in America. New York: Touchstone. Mason-Schrock, Douglas. 1996. Transsexuals Narrative Construction of the True Self. Social Psychology Quarterly 59(3):176192. Mirande, Alfredo. 1977. The Chicano Family: A Reanalysis of Conicting Views. Journal of Marriage and the Family 39(4):747756. Nagel, Joane. 2003. Race, Ethnicity, and Sexuality: Intimate Intersections, Forbidden Frontiers. New York: Oxford University Press. Omi, Michael and Howard Winant. 1994. Racial formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. Pascoe, C. J. 2005. Dude, Youre a Fag: Adolescent Masculinity and the Fag Discourse. Sexualities 8(3):329346. Purdie-Vaughns, Valerie and Richard P. Elbach. 2008. Intersectional Invisibility: The Distinctive Advantages and Disadvantages of Multiple Subordinate-Group Identities. Sex Roles 59(5/6):377391. Ray, Rashawn. 2005. To Be A Man: An Investigation of Masculinity Ideology and Mens Family Roles Among and Within African American, Anglo-American, and Mexican-American Families. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, August 12, Philadelphia. Ridgeway, Cecilia and Shelley Correll. 2004. Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations. Gender & Society 18(4):510531. Rodrguez, Clara E., ed. 1997. Latin Looks: Images of Latinas and Latinos in the U.S. Media. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Intersectional Identities
67
Rubin, Henry. 2003. Self-Made Men: Identity and Embodiment among Transsexual Men. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press. Sanday, Peggy Reeves. 1990. Fraternity Gang Rape: Sex, Brotherhood and Privilege on Campus. New York: New York University Press. Schilt, Kristen. 2006. Just One of the Guys?: How Transmen Make Gender Visible at Work. Gender & Society 20(4):465490. Snow, David A. and Leon Anderson. 1987. Identity Work among the Homeless: The Verbal Construction and Avowal of Personal Identities. American Journal of Sociology 92(6):13361371. Snow, David A., Louis A. Zurcher, and Gideon Sjoberg. 1982. Interview by Comment: An Adjunct to the Direct Question. Qualitative Sociology 5(4):285311. Stevens, Evelyn P. 1973. Machismo and Marianismo. Society 10(6):5763. Stone, Gregory P. 1962. Appearance and the Self: Interactionist Approach. Pp. 86118 in Human Behavior and Social Processes, edited by A. M. Rose. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifin Company. Strauss, Anselm L. 1978. Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. .1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press. Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Stryker, Sheldon. 1980. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings. Stryker, Susan. 2006. (De)Subjugated Knowledges: An Introduction to Transgender Studies. Pp. 118 in The Transgender Studies Reader, edited by S. Stryker and S. Whittle. New York: Routledge. Stryker, Susan and Stephen Whittle, eds. 2006. The Transgender Studies Reader. New York: Routledge. Thorne, Barrie. 1997. Gender Play: Girls and Boys in School. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Valentine, David. 2007. Imagining Transgender. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Ward, Jane. 2008. White Normativity: The Cultural Dimensions of Whiteness in a Racially Diverse LGBT Organizations. Sociological Perspectives 51(3):563586. West, Candace and Don H. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing Gender. Gender & Society 1(2):125151. Weston, Kathleen. 2004. Fieldwork in Lesbian and Gay Communities. Pp. 177184 in Approaches to Qualitative Research: A Reader on Theory and Practice, edited by S. N. Hesse-Biber and P. Leavy. New York: Oxford University Press. Wilkins, Amy C. 2004. Puerto Rican Wannabes: Sexual Spectacle and the Making of Race, Class, and Gender Boundaries. Gender & Society 18(1):103121.