We in America believe inresearchers and scientists working diligently to monitor the, communities, immunization registries, andonals to ensure that

Americans get only the finest, safest products. We couldong-term health. Are we being too nave? Of all the vaccines we and our s the truth about the potential for harm? In Part III of our onals repeat the mantra that vaccines are safe and effective. We have alreadyof this report that efficacy is a myth: vaccine manufacturers only proveable to evoke an antibody response, not that it can prevent an infection. So letse of little- known facts about vaccine safety studies. Unlike withred to use the cornerstone of medicine: theas built its consensus. Instead, they are allowed to compare their vaccine not only healthy children and adults aretudies. Yet, when the vaccines are approved, they are approved for everyoneudged by the investigators to be related to the vaccine. In a 1997 study to proveerious adverse experience, including: seizures, diarrhea, vomiting,requiring hospitalization. Yet none of these events was judged by the alse conclusion. Under this flawed system, ects are only noted once the Baby a Prostitute or an IV Drug User? on in childhood and not highly contagious. Symptoms of the disease areor, although fatigue can last up to a year. 95% of patients recover completely, andelong immunity. Of those who do not recover fully, fewer than 5% : birth -2 months, 1-4 months, and 6-18 months. Why do wet likely to be at risk? The CDCsade the decision to vaccinate everyone. Studies so far, however, have shown the fallacy s B vaccine? This vaccine is the emorrhage, meningitis, brain damage, Guillain1998. Sanofi Pasteur was further charged with manslaughter for the multiple sclerosis n France, it is not required as of this writing. In the US, the Vaccine Court ty wears off before a child is old enough to have sex or (Hib): Chasing a Mythical Villain eading name, Haemophilus influenzae type B is not a type of flu, although untilalsely thought to be responsible for influenza. Instead, Haemophilus influenzaeated in causing bacterial meningitis in babies. It is one of sixost individuals without causing disease. Highly adapted to its human ty from bacterial meningitis began a dramatic declinet reached a plateau in the 1950s.ty: Acthib by Sanofi Pasteur, and Hiberix by GSK,tidis bacteria. According to the New England Journal of Medicine, following uenzae vaccine, licensed in t touting Hib as a great vaccine success story, however, weome context. Disease attributed to H. influenzae type B, like pneumococcal diagnosed based on isolation of the bacterium inuid in the face of a wide variety of symptoms, including: meningitis,tis, arthritis, middle ear infections, respiratoryd osteomyelitis. Other bacteria, as well as viruses, cause these very sameot the same as a reduction in the incidence of bacterial meningitis. In fact,tidis , and s the vaccine itself? Not very. A look at the VAERS report shows the followingts: seizures, respiratory arrest, cardiac arrest, sudden death, apnea, choking,drome. The Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine is also one of the

ompeting researchers in the 1950s. Dr. Jonas Salk developed a killed intramuscular ert Sabin developed a live-attenuated oral vaccine. Although approved on ntroduced in the fall of 1955. Once available in 1961, the Sabin vaccine, even though it too had the capacity to cause polio. While tain immunity for the many. Authorities favored the OPV because it caused those, this viral shedding also caused collateral damage in unsuspectingo from changing their babys diapers. IP to change the recommendation away from the oral polio vaccine. In a o vaccine carries with it similar adverse effects as most of cluding: death, seizures, fever, rash, protracted vomiting, respiratoryratory arrest, and cyanosis. Although it does not appear to cause paralytic polio, tion is then:cancer in the US? Extensively studied over the years since theon-Hodgkins lymphoma, and malignant mesothelioma a cancer usually orm encephalopathy (BSE), or mad cow disease. In 2000, potential ad cow disease. Despite laws created in 1989 requiring that material from ng that could do them harm? Occasionally logic prevailst rescinded Belgiums mandatory polio vaccine law. Two sets of parentso vaccine. One vindicated parent said her reason for refusal was that the doctorsdehyde. The other outcome of the trial is that physicians in is More Dangerous than the Diseases?risks associated with immunizations. But the clinics flyer contained aa serious adverse reaction to the DP ne more than one virus strain in the same vaccine. In Britain, the Nationalous loss of confidence in the immunization program and a steep ons were 5000% higher than expected: instead of an expected incidence of der 6 months old, and there were two deaths. The study was ended early,s a bacterium that produces two powerful toxins which causeooping cough. In order to induce antibodies to be created, not just theon costs would eat into their profits! Although some companies ot were given before the state withdrew it from use,rst-in-command at the FDA returned, he insisted that the vaccine be putogy to the companies involved! For anyone who was payingves at risk is not nearly as important astribute vaccines so that no more than 2,500 vials from a specific lot would go to children from whole-cell pertussis DPT vaccine. Even the Institute owing decades of attempts to get whole-cell pertussis on program, which is still in place today. Although this programrom liability yet pays very few of the claims presented. Over the yearsedadjudication. A surcharge is paid by all of us who receive anypensation is estimated now to be in the billions of dollars. What are ? Sanofi Pasteur lists the following adverse effects for its Tripedia vaccine: , sepsis, and unresponsiveness. give the vaccine to protect against these 3 deadly diseases, right? Maybe not.been a reported case of diphtheria in the US since 2003. From 2001 through 2008 (7100% fatal. A person can still get tetanus even if vaccinated, and more , as well as otitis media, sinusitis, pneumoniase. Streptococcus pneumonia, the causative agent of pneumococcal disease, isease vector in babies sincen the early 1990s. Whereas prior to vaccination against predictable response: another new vaccine.ects. Over-use of antibiotics during the past quarter century,, are these resistant forms usually a cause for a concern in

healthydevelopment of a pneumococcal vaccine, the American Academy of uch as: immunoglobulin deficiency, Hodgkins disease, congenital or rom 23 types of pneumococcal bacteria. Adverse effects reported for s, myalgia, paraesthesia, censed in early 2000, and approved for children. Heralded as highlydren younger than 2 years in 2000, to 36 per 100,000 in 2005. Butean? Invasive pneumococcal disease is simply any of a number of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Exactly as with Haemophilus influenza type B,edia, pneumonia, or any other of the related illnesses. The only result of the trains than the previous Prevnar 7. The ll cause even worse disease. In 2010, the new pneumococcal erse effects of the vaccine? Death, SIDS, coma, hydrocephalus,onary edema, petechiae, plural effusion, and bacterial infection. 2011, Japanese authorities recalled Prevnar (and s in their first few years of life. The CDC estimates that by age 3,had a case of rotavirus. The disease does not confer lifelong immunityode due to the many strains, but does after a few infections. Normally, ot require special treatment aside from rest and fluids. In areas where sanitation, ow morbidity and mortality associated with rotavirus in the US. In an unusualcts from the vaccine occurred almost immediately, mostood flow and intestinal blockage. This condition is rapidly fatal. After multiple reports of such incidents, the CDC was forced to rus vaccine. There are currently two vaccines against rotavirus, Rotarixve-attenuated oral vaccines, and stress, pneumonia, apnea, cyanosis, sing that not one but both rotavirusto discuss the findings. Because there was no evidence that these viruses ow both vaccines to stay on the market! This is called cost benefit ratio.temic wasting syndrome in piglets. Disease c. Hepatitis A is transmitted through the fecal-oral route and thus can begiene, food preparation, and sanitation. Only about 3,600 cases of rarely fatal: a 2009 report from the CDC shows that onths -- which unfortunately is not so innocuous. According to VAERS, g or cause permanent damage: seizures, death, anaphylaxis, high fever,ting, transverse myelitis, and sepsis. n it be accine linked to autism? A brief history of autism shows thatwas a rare occurrence. Not only did the incidence of autism skyrocketor more than a decade that this is a result of improved diagnostic criteria. Shockingly, whether or not there isakefield, a British GI specialist andous study which showed that there was a causativetiated by the MMR vaccine and autism,hed. Initially published in the prestigious journal The Lancet in 1998,tted fraud. Why such a harsh and overly punitive response? take. In 1986, SmithKline Beecham created a trivalent MMR vaccine using athough not when given as a single vaccine. Clinical trials were limited toe picture of safety to this dangerous vaccine. Originally approved in Canadaeningitis. Because it was one-quarter of the price of the competingwere anxious to license it for use in the UK. SKB expressed s MMR without clinical trials based on favorable

eal this blatant act of deception: British authorities hadch bypassed the necessary clinical trials. They approved it contrary to experteningitis, and there was no plan in place for postmarketing surveillance. Wakefieldwho presented to him with intractable GI disease and autism. So of course,c literature is the issue of viral interference. As Dr. o causes children to get up to 9 vaccines at the same time. This does twoncreases the chance of viral interference leading both to serious adverseven at once it is impossible to sort out which one might haveerse reaction. This is one more way in which vaccines a live vaccine not attenuated of measles, mumps, and rubella virus. The fact that these viruses are liveease. The companys product information cautions againsta portion. It does not, however, explain what will happen ever, syncope, dizziness, vasculitis, pancreatitis, diabetes,, arthralgia (including the sure women into vaccinating their R vaccine primarily because measles is a killer. Even if we dont care toble? Many, if not most of us, over age 45 had measles as children, as did our atives: if measles is such a killer, why didnt we die? Furthermore, what those of e what we do Your Child Get the Chicken Pox? elong immunity. But in 1995, Merck licensed Varivax, a live virus vaccine1995 and July 1998, the federal Vaccine Adverse Eventson of -Barre syndrome, andold contacts, including a pregnant woman. A study in 2002 gnificantly. Children vaccinated at age 12 months and ed by herpes zoster, is now found in children. In a 2009 study, a shocking t? More boosters are now ed in the nasopharynx by up to 20% of healthy adults. N.on bacteria which in some individuals can lead to bacterialticemia. Highly diverse, N. meningitides containing 13 serogroups, 2013 immunotypes, the majority of which are not pathogenic. Infections are causedg a glass or cup. Historically, meningococcal disease was an s, outbreaks of meningococcal disease werenfants. However, since the introduction of the first meningitis tis in children and young adults in the United States. Now onjugated vaccine by Sanofi Pasteur, was licensed for general use in 2005,ended for children 11-18 years of age, and approved for ages 2 55. Therotypes A, C, Y, and W135. It does not, however, contain the meningococcal vaccine? To begin with, the vaccine itself --because it does not t. In this case, the protein used for conjugation is the diphtheria toxoid vaccineout 7,600 individuals aged 11-55 years. Serious adverse reactionsclude: anaphylaxis, difficulty breathing, upper airway swelling,arre Syndrome, paraesthesia, vasovagalto VAERS after receipt of Menactra. cation was that mostunologic memory, so is not recommended in most cases. Perhaps que concerns from all the other vaccines in three ways: it recommends not ts that the HPV: If the American public. The vaccine was designed to prevent only four types of thee by a pap smear and treated. What is not stated by Merck is that thecervical cancer. It is important to bear in mind that therepossible to get cervical cancer even with the

neffective. Merck knows this, but does not advertise this piece of e out against testing for HPV prior to vaccination. In fact, the only usively sexually transmitted virus, it is n the past several decades. The American of such magnitude that this vaccine needed to be brought to market. Most on to invasive cancer can be almost always prevented whenes are applied. Although prior to approval, Gardasil was touted as a 28 Gardasils clinical trials included fewer than 1,200 girls, all over the age of 15. 79 Yet the vaccineis extensively marketed to girls and boys under this age group. How is this possible? The FDAallowed Merck to infer efficacy for those under 15. In fact, the clinical trial is being conductedright now in real life by vaccinating American children with no knowledge of the consequences.As of June 2011, there were 18,727 adverse events reported by parents whose children hadreceived Gardasil, 346 of which were in boys. The CDC reported 68 deaths, and there are somethat say the number is closer to 102. While the package insert mentions the possibility of faintingfollowing the vaccine, the adverse reactions reported after Gardasil injection go far beyondfainting, and include: GuillainBarre Syndrome, paralysis, seizures, neurological damage, loss of control of muscles and movement, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Lou Gehrigs disease), warts allover face and body, and death. 80 The all too common scenario with Gardasil is that a young girl walks in as a vibrant, athleticchild, and days or weeks later following the vaccine, is an invalid, barely able to walk. Dr.Diane Harper, principal investigator for clinical vaccine trials for both Gardasil and Cervarix (theHPV vaccine made by GlaxoSmithKline) now publically questions the use of the vaccine shehelped to get approved. She has stated that the rate of serious adverse effects reported is 3.4 per 100,000 doses distributed, which is on par with the death rate from cervical cancer. In other words a girl is more likely to be injured from the vaccine than she is to die from cervicalcancer! 81 In September 2011, a news story came out that questioned the veracity of Mercks safety claimsabout their vaccine: contrary to the statement in the package insert, live HPV virus in the formof recombinant DNA was found in 13 samples of the vaccine. An independent study 29 commissioned by the mother of one of the injured girls, tested 13 vials of Gardasil from differentcountries and 4 different states in the US. In 100% of the samples they found live HPV virus. 82 The presence of live vaccine could mean that Gardasil would be capable of spreading HPVinstead of preventing it. Merck had previously maintained that there could not be

live,genetically modified HPV DNA in Gardasil, but in April it was discovered that they had quietlyremoved this claim from their package insert. There has been no response from either Merck or the FDA about this revelation and the possibility that Gardasil might cause cancer.Just last week on October 19 th , Judicial Watch released the news that they had received newdocuments from the FDA under the Freedom of Information Act documenting additional reportsof adverse reactions to the Gardasil vaccine. The new information details 26 previouslyunreported deaths -- in addition to the ones we already knew about -- between September 1, 2010and September 15, 2011, as well as new incidents of seizures, paralysis, blindness, pancreatitis,speech problems, short term memory loss, and Guillain-Barre Syndrome. 83 Tom Fitton,President of Judicial Watch, commented that these reports raise additional concerns aboutGardasils questionable safety and provide ample reason to end the push to give it to young girlsand boys Federal, state and local officials need to stop promoting this vaccine for children. 84 The advisability of getting this vaccine is perhaps best summed up by Dr. Russell Blaylock, board certified neurosurgeon, author, and lecturer: T he decision to vaccinate your daughter with Gardasil is one of the most critical youwill ever make and it is irreversible. If your daughter gets the vaccine and is thencrippled and having seizures, and her life is ruined, its hard to turn that around. Youcannot allow the doctor, who is only getting his information from the drug companies,to make this decision for you. 84

3 0 T he Healthy Immune System We Must Say No to Vaccines It becomes apparent in a review of all of the childhood vaccines that not only are none of themactually necessary to maintain health, but each and every one of them presents risks thatcould destroy a life. Should we be willing to take those risks for such minimal benefits? The pharmaceutical companies make billions of dollars on each of the required vaccines, not tomention annual flu shots, so the health of the individual stopped being a concern long ago if itever was.The assumption has always been that we can have both vaccinated immunity and a healthyimmune system, but this isnt proving to be true over time. The evidence is overwhelming that by injecting our children and ourselves with these diverse bacteria, viruses, proteins and all theother never-mentioned substances that are in vaccines, we are in fact short-circuiting our naturalimmune system making it worse instead of better. We now have the sickest children ever inthe history of the United States: Asthma, allergies, diabetes, otitis, childhood cancer, learningdisabilities, ADD, ADHD, autism, multiple sclerosis, chronic fatigue syndrome, rheumatoidarthritis, fungal infections, lupus, depression, bipolar disease, obesity, the list goes on and onand on. There arent enough

special education classrooms in the US to handle all the childrenwith special needs whose numbers have doubled in the past 20 years at precisely the same timethe numbers of doses of required childhood vaccines have tripled. Coincidence? Our childrenreceive more vaccines than any other child population in the world. None of this was true whenthe baby boomers were children. What have we done? 3 1 A healthy immune system gives us the ability to resist or subdue infection, and the foundationwe develop during our first years of life is what will sustain us. The outlook doesnt look very bright for our childrens health. It is time to seriously consider what we are injecting into our children and ourselves, and examine the consequences. Isnt it also time to reclaim our naturalimmunity and begin to say no to vaccines altogether? 32 Footnotes1. Jones A, High Court Delivers Blow to Vaccine Litigation, W all S treet J ournal , February 22,2011. http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2011/02/22/high-court-delivers-blow-tovaccine-litigation,accessed October 14, 2011.2. Tenpenny S, What CDC Documents and Science Reveal, DVD, RJ Media Majic June 9, 20033. Ibid4. NVIC, Hepatitis B Vaccine The Untold Story, National V accine I nformation C enter ,http://www.nvic.org/nvic-archives/newsletter/untoldstory.aspx nvic.org, accessed October 12,2011.5. Blaylock R, The Truth Behind the Vaccine Cover-Up

, M edical V eritas 5 (2008) 1714-1726,http://www.medicalveritas.com/manBlaylock.pdf, accessed October 14, 2011. 6. Petersen K, Duration of Hepatitis B Immunity in Low Risk Children Receiving Hepatitis BVaccinations from Birth; J ournal of P ediatric I nfectious D iseases 2004;23(7)7. Tenpenny S, What CDC Documents and Science Reveal, DVD, RJ Media Majic June 9, 20038. VAERS Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. http://vaers.hhs.gov/index, accessedOctober 14, 2011.9. Mikaeloff Y, Hepatitis B Vaccine and the Risk of CNS Inflammatory Demyelination inChildhood, Neurology , 2009 Mar 10; 72 (10); 873-80.10. Orient J, Statement of the Association Of American Physicians & Surgeons to the Subcommitteeon Criminal Justice, Drug Policy, and Human Resources of the Committee on GovernmentReform, U.S. House of Representatives, RE: Hepatitis B Vaccine, AA PS , June 14, 1999.http://www.aapsonline.org/testimony/hepbcom.htm, accessed October 14, 2011.11. Hanchette J, US does an about-face on hepatitis B vaccine: Shot no longer recommended,

G annett News S ervice 1999. http://www.gulfwarvets.com/detnews.htm, accessed October 14,2011.12. CDC, Newborn Hepatitis B Vaccine Coverage Among Children Born January 2003 June 2005, MM WR W eekly , August 1, 2008, http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5730a3.htm,accessed October 20, 2011.13. Leveque T, French judges probe firms over vaccinations source, R euters
, Feb 1, 2008,http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/02/01/france-vaccinationsidUSL0173467120080201,accessed October 15, 2011.