Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

Journal of Medical Microbiology (2005), 54, 155157

DOI 10.1099/jmm.0.45808-0

Short Communication
Correspondence R. Alonso ralonso.hgugm@salud. madrid.org

An improved protocol for pulsed-eld gel electrophoresis typing of Clostridium difcile


R. Alonso, A. Martn, T. Pelaez, M. Marn, M. Rodrguez-Creixems and E. Bouza
Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon, C/Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain

Received 2 July 2004 Accepted 24 October 2004

Pulsed-eld gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is the gold standard technique for bacterial typing and has proved to be discriminatory and reproducible for typing Clostridium difcile. Nevertheless, a high proportion of strains are non-typable by this technique due to the degradation of the DNA during the process. The introduction of several modications in the PFGE standard procedure increased typability from 40 % (90 isolates) to 100 % (220 isolates) while maintaining the high degree of discrimination and reproducibility of the technique.

Introduction
Clostridium difcile is the main aetiologic agent of nosocomial diarrhoea (Barbut et al., 1996) and is responsible for an important increase in hospital stays, with high healthcare and economic repercussions (Wilcox et al., 1996). Typing of the micro-organism can be useful in the detection and control of epidemic outbreaks and endemic situations, and in the characterization of recurrences (Alonso et al., 2001; Kato et al., 1996). Different approaches have been used for typing bacteria, although PFGE has traditionally been the gold standard (Finney, 1993). PFGE has proved to be discriminatory and reproducible for typing C. difcile; however, a considerable proportion of strains are non-typable by this technique due to degradation of the DNA during the procedure, making uninterpretable gel smears (Kato et al., 1994; Bidet et al., 2000). Different modications of the typing procedure have been proposed (Corkill et al., 2000), but they have led to variable results with only partial improvement (Klaassen et al., 2002; Fawley & Wilcox, 2002). The aim of this study was to develop a new PFGE protocol which can offer universal typability for all our C. difcile strains.

Standard protocol. Briey, the recommended standard protocol was

as follows. A bacterial culture was inoculated into LB broth with agitation and grown to an OD600 of 0.81.0. Then 5 3 108 bacteria were removed for each millilitre of agarose plug to be made and centrifuged to obtain the bacterial pellet. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet resuspended in 500 l of cell suspension buffer. The bacterial suspension was warmed to 50 8C. The 2 % CleanCut agarose was melted and equilibrated to 50 8C. Five hundred millilitres of agarose was added to the bacterial suspension and mixed thoroughly. The mixture was transferred to plug moulds and the agarose was allowed to solidify at 4 8C for 1015 min. The solidied plugs were incubated in 1 mg ml1 lysozyme solution (100 l 25 mg ml1 lysozyme stock plus 2.5 ml lysozyme buffer) for 2 h at 37 8C. The lysozyme was removed and the plugs were rinsed with sterile water. The plugs were incubated with .20 U ml1 proteinase K solution (100 l of .600 U ml1 proteinase K stock in 2.5 ml of proteinase K reaction buffer) at 50 8C for 2496 h. The plugs were washed four times in 13 wash buffer for 1 h each at room temperature with gentle agitation. The second or third wash contained 1 mM PMSF to inactivate residual proteinase K. Prior to endonuclease restriction, each plug was washed for 1 h in 1 ml 0.13 wash buffer and then rinsed with fresh 0.13 wash buffer. The plug was incubated for 1 h with 1 ml of 13 restriction enzyme buffer at room temperature and then overnight in 300 l of 13 restriction enzyme buffer containing 3050 U of the restriction enzyme at the appropriate temperature. After overnight digestion, the buffer was removed and the plug was incubated for 30 min in 13 wash buffer and then equilibrated in the appropriate concentration of gel-running buffer (e.g. 0.53 TBE). The manufacturer recommended loading one-quarter to one-third of a plug per well for electrophoresis. Although the manufacturer does not give any recommendation about the electrophoresis itself, most of the standard published series use 1 % agarose gels in 0.53 TBE buffer and the electrophoresis parameters vary widely depending on the restriction endonuclease used.
Modied protocol. Our protocol was based upon the standard

Methods
Samples and tests. Two hundred and twenty toxigenic C. difcile

isolates were included in this study. We obtained isolates from the diarrhoeic stool samples of patients admitted to our hospital over a period of 6 months. Cultures, identication and toxin detection were carried out using standard procedures. The CHEF bacterial DNA plug kit (BIO-RAD) was used for PFGE typing the isolates. The standard manufacturers recommended technique and our modied protocol were performed and compared.

commercial procedure as described, with the following modications.


This paper was presented at the First International Clostridium difcile Symposium, Kranjska Gora, Slovenia, 57 May 2004.

Fresh 24 h plate cultures were always used. When unfreezing strains, they were grown three times in CCFA or Brucella agar before starting. 155

45808 & 2005 SGM Printed in Great Britain

R. Alonso and others

BHI tubes were inoculated and incubated for 24 h to obtain a highdensity inoculum (OD600 .1.2). Incubations of more than 24 h were not performed. We removed 109 bacteria for each millilitre of agarose plug to be made. A fresh preparation of the BHI culture was observed by microscopy at 31000 magnication to check for the presence of spores. Cultures with a high proportion of spores (over 40 %) were ruled out. Lysozyme and proteinase K (Sigma) were prepared in-house and used at high concentrations (2 mg ml1 and 75 U ml1 , respectively). Proteinase K incubation was no longer than 18 h. Washing steps were reduced to 30 min. Endonuclease digestions were performed with high concentrations of enzyme (SmaI, 60 U in 300 l volumes). Thiourea (Sigma), always freshly prepared and kept in darkness until use, was included in the gel and running buffer in high concentrations (200 M).
Electrophoresis. Electrophoresis was run at 195 V for 20 h with pulse times starting at 4 s and ending at 30 s. Gels were stained with ethidium bromide, visualized under UV transillumination and recorded.

ribotyping scheme (Bidet et al., 2000), as a result of which we do not know whether our non-typable strains belong to those reported major groups. With the described modications to the protocol we increased the typability of the technique, enabling all our C. difcile isolates to be characterized by PFGE (Fig. 1b). Several factors have been proposed to explain the lack of typability in C. difcile by PFGE. Firstly, the micro-organism has very potent endonucleases that may degrade the extracted DNA inside the agarose plug during the extended process (Spigaglia et al., 2001). Some strains may produce fewer nucleases, which could be removed or degraded during nucleic acid extraction. In our proposed protocol, we shortened incubation and washing times in order to avoid or reduce such degradation. The high concentrations of proteinase K used could also help to digest nucleases more efciently. Secondly, it has been reported that a nucleolytic peracid derivative of Tris may form at the anode during electrophoresis and this chemical nucleolysis could be inhibited by the addition of thiourea to the running buffer (Ray et al., 1995). This effect has also been described for other micro-organisms (e.g. Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Romling & Tummler, 2000). The concentration of thiourea is controversial, and while some authors defend that 50 M is enough (Corkill et al., 2000), others report concentrations of up to 200 M in both the gel and the buffer (Fawley & Wilcox, 2002). We found that 50 M in the buffer had a reduced effect whereas the best results were achieved with 200 M in gel and buffer. Thirdly, we think it is extremely important to avoid spore formation. Cultures with a high rate of sporulated forms probably exhibit poorer lysis and produce less DNA. For this reason we recommend working with fresh cultures and screening for the presence of spores by microscopy before starting the DNA-extraction process. We also recommend using high lysozyme and proteinase K concentrations to facilitate spore lysis. Hypothetically, the strains belonging to our major ribotype could be more likely to produce spores, which could explain both the difculty in PFGE typing and a favourable spread in the hospital. According to this, many outbreaks have been reported to be caused by PFGE nontypable strains (Kato et al., 2001; Samore et al., 1997). In conclusion, the above-mentioned modications enabled us to achieve complete typability (increasing from 40 % to 100 %) within the assayed isolates while maintaining both a high degree of discrimination and the reproducibility of the technique.

Results and Discussion


Using the standard procedure, almost 60 % of the assayed isolates (130) remained untyped by PFGE (Fig. 1). The remaining strains offered good PFGE patterns that were reproduced on every occasion (e.g. the reference strain, C. difcile ATCC 9689, was included in every run and was always correctly typed). Although most of our non-typable isolates (98, 75 %) belonged to our most prevalent ribotype (R1), a considerable proportion (32, 25 %) were from several others (data not shown). Some other authors have reported the same phenomenon with PFGE and C. difcile at different frequencies. In most cases, non-typable strains belonged to serogroup G and ribotype 1 (ONeill et al., 1993; Kato et al., 1996) (some strains from this serogroup are typable; Bidet et al., 2000), although others have also reported the problem in different strains (Kato et al., 2001; Spigaglia et al., 2001). Unfortunately, we did not serotype our strains and we used a different

Acknowledgements
Fig. 1. Example of PFGE patterns belonging to ve representative clinical isolates of C. difcile using (a) standard procedures and (b) the modied protocol. 156 This paper has been supported in part by Red Espanola de Investigacion en Patologa Infecciosa (REIPI CO3/14) and by Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS 02/1049). We thank Thomas OBoyle for his help with the correction of the English version of this manuscript.

Journal of Medical Microbiology 54

Improved protocol for PFGE typing of C. difcile

References
Alonso, R., Gros, S., Pelaez, T., Garcia-de-Viedma, D., RodriguezCreixems, M. & Bouza, E. (2001). Molecular analysis of relapse vs re-

Kato, H., Kato, N., Watanabe, K. & 7 other authors (2001). Analysis of

Clostridium difcile isolates from nosocomial outbreaks at three hospitals in diverse areas of Japan. J Clin Microbiol 39, 13911395.
Klaassen, C. H., van Haren, H. A. & Horrevorts, A. M. (2002). Molecular

infection in HIV-positive patients suffering from recurrent Clostridium difcile associated diarrhoea. J Hosp Infect 48, 8692.
Barbut, F., Corthier, G., Charpak, Y. & 13 other authors (1996).

Prevalence and pathogenicity of Clostridium difcile in hospitalized patients. A French multicenter study. Arch Intern Med 156, 14491454.
Bidet, P., Lalande, V., Salauze, B., Burghoffer, B., Avesani, V., Delmee, M., Rossier, A., Barbut, F. & Petit, J. C. (2000). Comparison of PCR-

ngerprinting of Clostridium difcile isolates: pulsed-eld gel electrophoresis versus amplied fragment length polymorphism. J Clin Microbiol 40, 101104.
ONeill, G., Adams, J. E., Bowman, R. A. & Riley, T. V. (1993). A

molecular characterization of Clostridium difcile isolates in humans, animals and their environments. Epidemiol Infect 111, 257264.
Ray, T., Mills, A. & Dyson, P. (1995). Tris-dependent oxidative DNA

ribotyping, arbitrarily primed PCR, and pulsed-eld gel electrophoresis for typing Clostridium difcile. J Clin Microbiol 38, 24842487.
Corkill, J. E., Graham, R., Hart, C. A. & Stubbs, S. (2000). Pulsed-eld gel

strand scission during electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 16, 888894.


Romling, U. & Tummler, B. (2000). Achieving 100 % typeability of

electrophoresis of degradation-sensitive DNAs from Clostridium difcile PCR ribotype 1 strains. J Clin Microbiol 38, 27912792.
Fawley, W. N. & Wilcox, M. H. (2002). Pulsed-eld gel electrophoresis

Pseudomonas aeruginosa by pulsed-eld gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol 38, 464465.


Samore, M., Killgore, G., Johnson, S. & 8 other authors (1997).

can yield DNA ngerprints of degradation-susceptible Clostridium difcile strains. J Clin Microbiol 40, 35463547.
Finney, M. (1993). Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis. New York: Greene-

Wiley.
Kato, H., Kato, N., Watanabe, K., Ueno, K., Ushijima, H., Hashira, S. & Abe, T. (1994). Application of typing by pulsed-eld gel electrophoresis

Multicenter typing comparison of sporadic and outbreak Clostridium difcile isolates from geographically diverse hospitals. J Infect Dis 176, 12331238.
Spigaglia, P., Cardines, R., Rossi, S., Menozzi, M. G. & Mastrantonio, P. (2001). Molecular typing and long-term comparison of Clostridium

to the study of Clostridium difcile in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol 32, 20672070.
Kato, H., Kato, N., Watanabe, K., Ueno, K., Sakata, Y. & Fujita, K. (1996).

difcile strains by pulsed-eld gel electrophoresis and PCR-ribotyping. J Med Microbiol 50, 407414.
Wilcox, M. H., Cunniffe, J. G., Trundle, C. & Redpath, C. (1996).

Relapses or reinfections: analysis of a case of Clostridium difcileassociated colitis by two typing systems. Curr Microbiol 33, 220223.

Financial burden of hospital-acquired Clostridium difcile infection. J Hosp Infect 34, 2330.

http://jmm.sgmjournals.org

157

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen