Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. MTT-19, NO. 5, MAY 1971
The
Evenfor
and
Odd-Mode Lines
Capacitance
Parameters Substrate
Coupled
in Suspended
MEMBER,
JOHN I. SMITH,
IEEE
AbsfracfStatic capacitance characterizations are derived for coupled thin-iihn conductors in the suspended substrate geometry, which includes shielded microstrip as a special case. In particular, a satisfactory treatment of closely coupled and narrow lines is obtained where, because of the dominance of the edge singularity, (mesh point analyses are inadequate, The present work was carried through to meet the need in interactive design procedures for characterization of a general transmission geometry. For these procedures, algorithms are required that take little storage and are suitable for very rapid calculations. Capacitance formulas are derived from vsriationsf series based on conformal transformations, and these series are converted to easily evaluated iinite forms. Calculation of the even- and odd-mode fringing capacitances for coupled limes is made for iinite line widths assuming a periodic array of lines. The applicability of these capacitances to a single pair of lines and to tilte filter arrays has been checked experimentally. Routines for lower bound values of fringing capacitances are given. Upper bound formulations validate the accuracy of the lower bound calculations.
show in practice,
that
the
error
and
Iinewidths. author
is to assume capacitance.
infinitely
thin-film to the
thicker metalizations found on the softer stripline substrates, an increase of approximately 3 percent in fringing capacitance values gave an improvement in the agreement ments. with This between increase calculated agrees with response stripline and values experiincrease found the calculated
thickness
of the symmetrical
by Getsinger [1] for infinitely wide lines. Finally it is noted that the use of static capacitances applies exactly at zero frequency only since propagation in microstrip and suspended substrate is known to be dispersive [5 ]-[~]. Measurements show that the velocity dis-
I. HE T
and parameters
INTRODUCTION
needed are of the from the to characterize the surge coupled impedances modes. and lines. in of These
persion is less than 0.3 of 1 percent per GHz for a SO-Q line in microstrip and certainly less than this in suspended between itance and substrate. Very satisfactory and circuits the agreement predictions mode results of is found perforexperiments characterizations velocity parameters.
normal odd-
coupled paper
mance of microwave
to 10 GHz Specific
presented using modified unsymmetrical are are the obtained, found there capacitances
terms
of the TEM
Getsinger
inhomo-
component. of lines
in
use of Fourier
characterization given in this paper for coupled lines in suspended substrate are found in symposium papers by Smith [4], Johnson and Zysman [8], [9], and Alley 121 ]. A problem in the characterization of the capacitance in microstrip-type circuits comes about because of the small the gap between charge or and lines in some useful at slowly circuits where edges useful. field singularities much too conductor to be
in general,
dominate. diverge
series solutions
across taken
approximately
of this
in Section
of programs
calculation of
are found
appendixes. assessment coupled the the lines, theoretical an is array of error lines in [3]. as opposed are by
Similar remarks apply also to finite difference solutions [1o]- [12] of Laplaces equation or matrix solutions of the system integral equations for which the very fine mesh required for small gaps and the resulting immoderately large system of equations to be solved lead to difficulties paper, in both accuracy are absorbed problems whose and convergence. into capacitance solutions In this terms singularities
comparison Bryant
are known.
CAPACITANCE
Manuscript received April 30, 1970; revised November 6, 1970. This work was supported under Contract DAHC-60-69-C-OO08. Major portions of this paper were originally presented at the 1969 IEEE International Microwave Symposium, Dallas, Tex., M~y 5-7. The author is with Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., Whlppany, N. J. 07981.
One cell of a periodic array of lines is shown in Fig. 1. Electric walls at x = O and x = T represent the odd-mode symmetry in a cell. The conductor extends between x=0 and x = T 0 and is held at 1 V. The total space
425
into
three in
regions energy
in Fig. for an
function airdielectric
a variational interface.
along
is a magnetic
to the quite reasonable physical equivalent of a field line on the interface going straight across between the conductors. With this approximation it is possible to find a closed expression for the potential across the gap. This potential is then matched to the Fourier expansions of the mining tion, itance potentials throughout to note that, the higher for the system, thus deterIt is Because terms by from When the an expansion factor The a (2). of the edge singularity, higlher rapid in region region harmonic 3, weighted by term 3 is known. is dominate series (2). To obtain for the capacitance (K+ 1)/2, capacitance CT in convergence, term all of the coefficients the convergence is assured; except of these expansions.
Fig.
1.
Geometry
of coupled
lines.
very important
also because of the assumpseries for capacfor terms in this series can be
is subtracted
identified,
to an expansion
classical stripline problem solvable another way in closed form. The singularities in the inhomogeneous problem are thus mopped up in the homogeneous problem whose solution is already known, Expressions for the interface potential
the in capacitance region 3, are CT, which found in represents terms The 1. The the of elliptic required in expansion
CT is returned
4,(x,
energy
transformations. in Appendix
potential
3 of
1 is also given
by the Fourier
(5)
of this function
2TKm
~2ntd1
where are
PF(m)
(6) with
determined
the
potential
increasing
decrease
of ~F(m) capacitance
C~/C~ is given
Components of the electric field, potentials, are squared and summed tional series i CV2 for V= 1, this series gives c = ~ Eo =l?
m ,,, $,,
CT
. Co
4F(1, F(l,
a)
(7)
a)
the
energy
system.
integral in the
F and
the
pm
a are from in
1. The
are
given evaluated
of the sum in
sufficient,
so that
K +
{
bound
on the capacitance
l/K
tanh mgl coth mdl } LOWER BOUND ON ODD-MODE integral [14] for a lower bound on CAPACITANCE capacitance is mp.z ,.. . (l/A) coth mgj }
.. :[;
+ ~
_l~ -,,
An [13], (2)
l/K
dx 2
(8)
dx
o d1=y2yl gl = yl and K is the substrate dielectric constant. (3) ~~~~d is the conductor assumed trial charge charge density function potential corresponding to an density function p. Both this and the conductor potential are
426 expandable in the Fourier series over the region (O, T):
(9)
1,3,5, . . .
+C.nd(x)
~ *m 1,3,5, . . .
sin mx.
integral
(10)
Fig. 2.
Geometry
U
e A
T-.9 Y2
/
.
the
by
for homogeneous
odd-mode
problem.
On using
one finds
these
expansions E(I c
in
variational
(8),
~;,
, ,; ,,,
+.P~
...
(11)
for
density
func-
pm.
(18)
n-os
derive
we
Yamashita
considered
[15].
here,
When
one
applied
to
the
periodic
case
have
trial
tacitly
function.
assumed
Using
that
this
p(x) trial
given function,
(17) a very
is a good rapidly
obtains
*m=
(1 +
As where
in
the for
for be
convergent co ~
sum
for
capacitance
is found:
harmonics
convergence
is obtained a limiting is
by value
subtracting
from
(11),
term
by m.
= ;@k,,3,5,...
Pm?~+&$:
(19)
a singularity is given in at x =6 that of (18) II. Appendix
of the product
~~pw
for large
result =
be removed.
2 +~ 2Q2 K + where
2m
(13)
trial
charge mapping
conformal
homogeneous
geometry.
The
geometry
chosen
is that
of Fig.
2, but
As can sum
in
series
(4), with
the index
PF (m)
the first ill=3/dl. as follows. Fig. 2.
ex(13)
ponentially can
in
with the short-circuit sidewalls replaced by opencircuit walls. Fourier coefficients pm of the trial function
and using total the charge Fourier integral Q are series (8), worked for one has out in Appendix and potential 1 I. On in the charge
second
are Fig. the 2
Consider
Fourier
shown
variational
distribution
and
CT is the system
capacitance,
then
(20)
This is reformulated into a rapidly convergent sum by
The
are
p(x) capacitance CT and the charge distribution readily found from conformal mappings. Their mappings are given in Appendix I I from which we find Q=%=
subtracting, term by term, the series representing the capacitance for the homogeneous problem, weighted by an appropriate factor. When this capacitance is added, outside the sum, the result is _.
c
co
4F(1, co F(l,
2;
2
p(x) =
(17)
aF (1, sin ~) d
1 (l/a)
sn (x, k)
21)
427
where 1 +Ktanhmglcothmdl PF(m) = m ~coth mgj(l + K tanh mgl coth mall) + K(K tanh mgl + coth mall)} 1 tanhm(gl+dl) . ~ K+l (22)
Here
even-
and
odd-mode example,
capacitances are
for
the
end
conductor
. q
is
2cp
T29
+
g2
T28 (23)
gI i&/k
in Fig.
3, for
co; = 2CP +
2cf: + 2cf
+ 2cf
(28) (29]
capaccapacplanes
the parallel-plate
typically a similar for upper in for was sum rapid bound an the earlier
sum This
in
nates with
sum,
found and on
previous calculation
capacitance
potential as = was
(30)
used here, ~.
chosen
b(l
(24)
of the two
is given
minimized a and
co =
10/(36r)
pF/cm.
(31)
variational
b in this
impedance
capacitance capacitance
V.
USE
OF FRINGING
CAPACITANCES
Values for the fringing capacitances may be calculated using the two function subprograms given in the appendixes. These CFODD(W, and CFEVEN(W, G, K, Gl, Dl, G2) = Cf;. (26) routines are
IX,
the capacitance of the system with moved [16 ][18 ]. The velocity ratio, divided by the velocity of light
in air, is
G, K, Gl,
G2) = Cfo
(25)
and the impedance
v/vo = ~cJc~
is
=
(32)
The input parameters are listed in Table I and illustrated in Fig. 3. The condition G1 = O defines microstrip = G2 defines a lines. The condition K = 1 and G1 +Dl
balanced puts farads within of units. stripline,l Cfo = CFODD per the centimeter. programs Units and Input and may chosen for program call are are any outpicoCf, = CFEVEN variables be in
In This
many
problems odd-
the and
is the
differ-
ence
between difference
capacitance.
is the AC
(34)
normalized set
consistent
as an example parameters:
dielectric
constant components
strate. ground,
or odd-mode
capacitance
w = 0.020
G = 0.004
G1=O
ing capacitance to the parallel-plate component 2 CP. The total odd-mode capacitance to ground for the center conductor in Fig. 3 isz coo = 2CP iIn calculating or for to the the total end capacitance lines in Fig. edge
DI
= 0.024
K=lo
From values: CFOD D one finds
G2 = 0.100.
the fringing capacitance
4cfo.
for unequally must the 3, care of the
(27)
spaced be taken The
Cf;
= 0.656 0.131
K := 10
K:=l
parallel-plate at each
component
appropriate
Cf: =
Cf
capacitance
conductor.
= 0.214
K = 10 K = 1.
found from (30), is
1 For a stripline problem where the conductors are supported by a homogeneous dielectric, values of capacitances obtained from the by the relative dielectric programs using K = 1 should be multiplied constant of the supporting medium. Z The factors of two in these formulas are carryovers from the notation established for symmetrical stripline [1], [2]. Our 2 Cc is still the total parallel-plate capacitance of a single conductor.
Cf = 0.040
The parallel-plate
G=co
capacitance,
2CP = 0.755
2CP = 0.091
K=1O K=l
428
Lo .
LW4
,,
1
:,, ,.
2
DI :, E u > ?.4 * v
.8
/G1 I
.6 -
W=.1,
GI=.088,
01=.048, K=IO
G2=.114
.2 -
UPPER
BOUNO
Fig. 3.
Capacitance
\~ow~~
B()ND
TABLE
o
Fig. 4.
.2
.4 Gap-cm
.6
INPUT VARIABLES
Odd-mode
fringing
capacitance
w
: G1 D1 G2
Circuit Iinewidth Conductor gap to adjacent line Relative dielectric constant of substrate G;ound plane to diel~ctric support spacing Dlelectnc support thickness Circuit to top ground plane spacing
.15
E : .: s
lo
and total
odd-mode
capacitances,
(29), is
.05
Co; = 2.49.5
CO; = 0.432
On
1[
~
Even-mode fringing TABLE
COUPLED
+
.8
1.0
(K=
10).
~UPPER
BOUND
kLOWER
BouND
01=.048,
G2=.114
Lo
capacitance (K= 10).
Gap-cm
using these values of capacitance in (32) and we find odd-mode velocity and impedance as V/VO = 0.416 Z = 32.1 VI.
A
(33),
Fig. 5.
II
Q.
PAIR IN MICROSTRIP
W/Dl
CK Odd Bryant and Smith Weiss [3] 114.2 143.3 164.7 182.3 197.5 211.0 223.4 234.9 256.2 276.2 295.4 313.9 332.0 349.9 K=1O.O; 120.5 150.1 170.6 187.0 201.0 213.6 225.3 236.2 256.9 276.6 295.7 314..5 333.0 351.5
CR Even Bryant and Smith Weiss [3] 51.8 64.0 74.6 84.7 94.3 103.7 113.0 122.1 140.2 158.2 176.1 193.8 211.6 229.1
comparison
between fringing
0.1
the odd-mode
capacitance
as a function
of line
gap is shown in Fig. 4, and a similar comparison for the even mode is shown in Fig. 5. These comparisons were made for O.l-cm (80-fl) linewidth. For very narrow lines with large gaps (ZO >100 Q), the upper bound calculations fail. Lower bound values have, however, given excellent prediction of the performance of circuits having linewidths and gaps from 0.001 cm and up. Published comparisons are given in [4], [8], [9], and [21 ]. For a pair of lines, as distinct from an array of lines, there is some error in the calculations due to the slightly different interaction of fringing fields across the width of a line. This error is less than that obtained when infinitely wide lines are assumed in the calculations. Comparisons between the capacitances obtained here for a pair of lines on microstrip and the tabulations of Bryant and Weiss, which were obtained by numerical solution of the system integral equations for two are shown in Table II. The function subprograms sented in this paper use lower bound lines, pre-
0.2 0.3
0.4 ::: 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 :::
Note: G/Dl=O.2;
G1 =0; G2= W.
which are adequate in view of the very close calculated bounds obtained. These programs were designed for interactive machine-aided design.
APPENDIX I
In tial which
this
appendix for
we
find
the
and in walls.
potenFig. 1, The
distribution is enclosed
region electric
3, the and
formulations,
by
magnetic
429
Y
m \
\ \ \ \ n -F(l,k) ---F ~/f//4 //////
iY
q .
$ + ---s X. D +(1, k) x F (I, k) z PLANE
m /,,/,,,/,,,,, I
////////////,
q F(l,k) I
I I
z PLANE x
-F!l,
t = sn
(z,k)
I
-k a=sn(xo, p= F(+, k) a)
PLANE
~m...-----r
-;
1s & /--------qp?zim -a
t _ P1 ANE a +a=sn(xo, k) k P PLANE _ m,
A
n ./////////. I I
1 +1
,////////
f t
P F(i,
1
,q a) P PLANE ! : : t />s
F(l,
SINa)
,*
cos
r $,,,,,,,,,>,,,,,,, -F(l,
. a)
r%mmz
VOLT Z77Z7ZJ
;s F(l,f3)
a)
COS a = ka
F( I,COS
Fig.
6.
Conformal
mappings
for odd-mode
homogeneous
problem.
Fig. 7.
Conformal
mappings
for even-mode
homogeneous
problem.
z-plane the
geometry of the
for
this
region polygon
is shown equation to
in~Fig. [19 ]
6. A relates half t
The
imaginary
part
of P is given
by, an integral
differential z-plane is 1
the ~upper
dz
%= This, when integrated,
Z =
(35)
<(1 yields P) (1 k%)
which
can be integrated
Im
P = F(I,
a)
F {(EY2, )
F(t, k),
incomplete function
t = sn(z, k).
elliptic [19]. integral; Parameter sn(z,
(36)
k)
and F
+(x) =
F(t, is
k) is the
the
first
sine-amplitude
k is
{(
sn
(x, k)
1/2
, CLf
(41) F(I, a)
1 sn (xo, ~ )}
determined
by the transcendental
F(1> k) . 2G2
equation (37)
APPENDIX
11
k)
W+G
in
this
appendix
the capacitance
and
charge
distri-
is transformed in Fig.
a paralleltransfor-
bution are found, for the even-mode homogeneous region. A z-plane representation of this region is shown in Fig. 7. The transformation
shown
t = sn (z, k) p = F(t/a,
a), t = asn (p, a).
a capacitance (38) maps half the interior of the z-plane polygon to the
(42)
upper
From
this
one
determines
t plane.
A second
transformation
cl
Ell
4F(1, a) a = 41 F(l, a)
yields along the interface Imp $(p)= l-. is
a,
a = sn
(*o,
k)
(39)
~=
a solvable
and
a potential
(40) F(l, a)
cl
EIJ
4F(1, F(I,
COS a)
(44) sin a)
430
FUNCTION C?83D(!JX, Gx, EK, GIX, DIX, G2X) C4LL CFEO(l, CF, WX, GX, EK, GIX, DIX, 62X) CF@DD:CF RETURN: END FUNCTION CFEVEV(WX, GX, I?K, GIX, DIX, G2X) CALL CFE9(2, CF, WX, GX, EK, GIX, D1X,62X) CFIIVEN=CF RETURN: END SUBROUTINE CFEE(IC, CF, WX, GX, EK, GIX, 1)1 X, 62X) DIblENS16~ V(30) RE4L K,KP T4NH(x)=( l.ExP(-2. *x))/ (1. +ExP(-2. *X) ); COTH(X)=l. GN(GI)z I.+ K* TANH(G1)*COTH(D1) GD(Gl)=CBTH( G2)+K*C8TH( Dl)+K*TANH( Gl)*(K+CCTH( m)* PHI(Gl) =GN(GI) /GD(Gl)-TANH( Gl+Dl)/(l. +K) PI:3. 141593 WO=WX; Go=Gx; G1 fj=GIX:Dl !3=ill X; G20=G2X:K=EK IF(Wt)>3. *Dl O) WO=3. *D18 IF(G2@>s. *D IO) C2.0=6. *oli3 R:2. *( Gl&D1O)/(WO+GE) X=-. O979:DX=.1 2 X= X+ DX:IF(X<O. ) G6 TE 16 IF(xc.999998) (30 TO 7 X: X- DX; DX=DX/5.: IF(I) X>l. E-6) GD T@ 2 X=.999998 :G0=4. *( GINt DIO)*ELPl (X)/P I- WO; GO 10 3 7 Y= W?RT(I .-X*X) IF(y<.9~qQ9g) GO TO 17 16 IF(IC>l) GO TO 4 X= O.:G21 TO 3 4 X=. 002:YZSQRT( l.X* X): 17 CaNTINUE Rl=ELPl(Y)/ELPl (x)
IF(AgS(R-RI)<I.E-Z,) GO
JACOB14N SINE AMPLITUDE FUNCTION FUNCTION SN(XX, KX) REAL K, KX, KN(IO) X= XX: K=KX UN= X: XZSQRT(l .- K* K); KN(I)= (l. -X)/(1.+X) IF(KN(I )-1.) 11, ID,1O ~~ ~#j. -fXP(-2. *UN) )/( 1.+ EXP(-2. *UN)) 11
/T4NH(X) CETH(Dl))
N=l -K N(N)* KN(N)) KN(K+l)=(l .-x)/( 1.+x) :IF(KN(N)-I .E-8) 4 UN= UN/( 1.+ KN( N)) !4:4+1 GO T3 5 3 UY=UN/(l. +KN(N+l)) S~51N( UN) IF(N-1) 8,8,9 9 CONTINUE DO 6 1=2, N J, N- I+l:S=( l.+ KN(J))*S/( 1.+ XN(J)*S*S) 6 CONTINUE
5 X, SQRT(I.
3 ,4,4
W@, (GIHDID)*P
I/
ELPI(Y)-GO:GO
Tg
TO
:GFJ Te 2 GB)
FIRST CBMPLETE ELLIPTIC INTGRAL 7!JNCT19N ELP1 (4X) P5%L 1(, KP K=4X:KPZI. -K*K AO=l.336?944; Al=. 1119723: A2:.07252g6 I??:.5: BI=.1213478 ;B2=.02B8729 17( K<.99999) GO T9 1 ELPI ,.5*AL@G(16. /KP) GO TO 2 1 CONTINUE ELPl=(E@?l *KP+B2*KP* KP)*ALOG( 1./ KP)+A&Al*KP+A2* 2 RETURN END
KP*KP
Fig. 9.
(x); cTz4. *E/EN 0/WO: D1=W*31 o/it@: 32z W*3?t.,Jt
Program
listing;
elliptic
functions.
W=PI* Wfj/( w!3t Gg); fi=#GO/ti& GIEw*GI W0=W:130= G: Ii10=Gl; DI #J:DI; (320=G2 N=29: VJ=N-l: F12X@/FL04T( NJ) DO ~o J: I,NJ X: H* FLOAT(J-1) s=s N(x, KP):Y,2. 20 v(J) =5 QRT((1 *K P-l.+ .-( (1. -K P)* /(1.
To
evaluate Write
(46),
the
singularity
at
x = XO must
be re-
moved.
cO=o. ?u:(-l.
)**Ic
Y*s)**2)
f($) Cos ;
= Cos
:
f
?(x) + g(fi)
(49)
DO lil-oz IC,200,2 u,-lJ 4Mz FLOAT(Y) :?l=A%51E: Dl=A%D1O; G2, AwU0 PHM=PHI( Gl); IF(ABS(PHM/( 1.+1() )<.00001) GO TO 15 CA= COS(Am X6/F) PM, (1 .- CrIl)+4. *V(r4J)*( COS(4hW(Xa-H) /F: -CM) JJ= N-3 DO 30 J:2. JJ. z X. H*~L8ATt J-i): YZX+H PW2PMt4. *V(J) *( COS(4?k X/ F)- CM)+2. *V(J+l) *( C3S(4WY/F) 30 CO VT INIJE PM=4*Fx CW+H*PM/3.: P1=8. *P* U/( PI. A* EN) CO= COt Pm PH%PM/Ai 14 CaNTINUE
g(%) = Then
-Cti)
Pm =
(
8
Cos ~
Cos
)
Q
?(x).
(50)
8 ~aF(l,
o Y(X) dx
cE2c@PI/(2. *c T*c T) IF(Ic>l) GB To ;2 C0=CC+2. /((l .+ K)* CT):Ii O T@ 11 12 Cg, CW2. *(1. /C T-( G1@t Dl0) /(2. 11 co=l. /c9 CF=lO. *( CO- CP)/(4. RETIJRN: END *35. *PI)
fraF(l,
sin
a)
mw Cos 20 s
g(X)
dx.
(51)
*P I))/(l.+K)+
Wti/(CP*(
WHGO))
The
first
integral
COS a)
is another
mxfi Cos
elliptic
m7r Cos
function,
giving
Fig. 8.
capacitance.
827(1,
Pm =
sin a)
fz
_2.
aF(l,
(l/a) trial
1
are
1/2
+ (45)
. by (46) The g(xo) ing ing integral = O, all the in in
7ra,F(l,
sin a)
mr Cos 20
0 g(x)
dx.
(52)
(52) the
and
since
Fourier
coefficients
for
this
given
~m=
7raF(l,
8
sin a)
mr Cos
20
s
.
Mappings
O Y(%) COS;
dx
boundary for
in Fig,
7 by short-circuit
one arrives
at the
where r(x) =
formulas
1 sn2 (z, k)
(47)
CT
(1/a2)
sn2 (x, k)
(48)
4F(1, F(l, Co
(53)
f=
227(1,
Cos a) T
p(x)
= aF(l,
sin+)
(54)
19, NO.
[8]
~, MAY
1971
431
fringing
capacitances.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT The W. author wishes of Bell during paper. to express his appreciation Laboratories long to for gestation were also W. his
Mumford
Telephone the
somewhat
Constructive
A. K. Johnson, preparation
G. I. Zysman manuscript.
and
REFERENCES [1] W. j. Getsinger, Coupled rectangular bars between parallel plates, IRE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. MTT-10, Jan. 1962, pp. 65-72. [2] S. B. Cohn, Shielded coupled-strip transmission line, IEEE Tram. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. MTT-3, Oct. 1955, pp.
29-38. [3] T. G. Bryant and J. A. Weiss, Parameters of microstrip transmission lines and of coupled pairs of microstrip lines, IEEE
Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. MTT-16, Dec. 1968, pp. 1021-1027. [4] J. I. Smith, The even and odd mode capacitance parameters for Int. Microcoupled lines in suspended substrate, in 1969 IEEE wave Syrnp. Dig., pp. 324328. [5] G. 1. Zysman and D. Varon, Wave propagation in microstrip IEEE Int. Miwowave Symfi. Dig., transmission lines, in 1969
D. Mass6, and R. A. Pucel, Frequency depenInt. Microwave of microstrip, in 1968 IEEE .$ytn~. Dig., pp. 110-119. [7] R. Troughton, Measurement techniques in microstrip, Electron. Lett., vol. 5, Jan. 23, 1969, pp. 25-26. dent behavior
[6] ~~;-fiartwig,
A. K. Johnson and G. I. Zysman, Coupled transmission line networks in an inhomogeneous dielectric medium, in 1969 IEEE Int. Microwave Symp. Dig., pp. 329-337. [9] G. I. Zysman ?nd A. K. Johnson, Coupled transmission line Trans. networks in an mhomogeneous dielectric medium, IEEE Microwave Theory Tech., vol. MTT-17, Oct. 1969, pp. 753-759. [10] H. E. Green, The numerical solution of some important transTrans. Microwave Theory Tech., mission-line problems, IEEE vol. MTT-13, Sept. 1965, pp. 676692. in improving finite dif[11] D. H. Sinnot~, The use of interpolation Trans. ference solutlons of TEM mode structures, IEEE Microwave Tkeo~y Tech., vol. MTT-17, Jan. 1969, pp. 20-28. [12] Y. M. Hill. N. O. Reckord. and D. R. Wirmer. A general method for obtaining impeda~ce and coupling cha~acteri=tics of practical microstrip and triplate transmission line configuraJ. Res. Develop., vol. 13? May 1969, pp. 314-322. tions, IBM Field Theory of Gwzded Waves. New York: [13] R. E, Collin, McGraw-Hill, 1960, ch. 4. method for the analy[14] E. Yamashita and R. Mittra, Variational sis of microstrip lines, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. MTT-16, Apr. 1968, pp. 251256. [15] E. Yamashita, Variational method for the analysis of microstrip-like transmission lines, IEEE Trans. Mic~owave Theory Tech., vol. MTT-16, Aug. 1968, pp. 529-535. [16] H. A. Wheeler, Transmission-line m-oDerties of Darallel strios separated by a dielectric sheet, IEEE Trans. ibfi~~owave Theo>y Tech., vol. MTT-13, Mar. 1965, pp. 172-185. [17] H. E. Brenner, Numerical solution of TEM-line problems involving inhomogeneous media, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theo~y Tech. (Corresp.), vol. MTT-15, Aug. 1967,. pp. 485-487. [18] H E. Stinehelfer, S$, ~(An accurate calculation of uniform microTrans. Microwave Theory Tech., st~p transmission hnes, IEEE VOI. MTT-16, July 1968, pp. 439444. [19] K. J. Binns and P. J. Lawrenson, Analysis and Computation of Electric and Magnetic FMd Problems. New York: Pergamon, 1963, ch. 9. [20] A. Eagle, The Elliptu Functions as They Should Be. Cambridge, England: Galloway and Porter, 1958. [21]G. D. Alley, Interdigital capacitors for use in lumped-element Int. Microaqave microwave integrated circuits, in 1970 IEEE Symp. Dig., pp. 7-13.
A Design Using
Method Equivalent
for
Meander-Line
Networks
Circuit
Transformations
MEMBER, IEEE
Absfracf-Msny types of coupled structures are used to design microwave filters and equalizers. One such structure is the array of coupled parallel commensurate conductors called a meander line. There are several analysis techniques that may be used to find the equivalent circuit of a meander line. However, these do not provide exact design equations. In tlds paper, meander-line networks are analyzed and synthesized using the graph-transformation technique. The equivalent circuits of one- and two-port meander-line
networks will be developed by using the transformation method, and it will be shown that meander-line networks can be easily designed by using the electronic computer. 1. INTRODUCTION
ANY M TYPES
design
hlanuscript received May 21, 1970; revised November 23, 1970. The author was with Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, Calif., on leave from Tohoku University. He is now with Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
such structure is the array of coupled parallel commensurate conductors called a meander line, which is shown in Fig. 1. The meander line may be either between ground planes, or above a single ground plane,