BloomShare on Computer4.

lnk

REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR SMALL-SCALE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS

Name of SSI Scheme: Name of Region: Name of Woreda: Name of Kebele: Head work location: Command area location: Date of Review: Completeness of the feasibility study and detail design (Yes/No) Existin Review Result Type of study g (Against accepted Docum guidelines) ent Total population & specific No of beneficiaries identified by sex Topographic Survey: Geological and Geotechnical Study: Hydrological Study: Headwork design Irrigation Infrastructure design Irrigation Agronomy: Soil Survey and Investigation: Watershed Management Study: Socio-Economic Survey and Investigation: Financial and Economic Analysis: Environmental & Social Impact Assessment: EIA SIA Planning and Design Process (Yes/No) Review Topic Existin g Docum ent Review Result

Community

sensitisation campaign undertaken/by petition Formation of WUA completed Training of WUA leaders and members conducted Project Preparation and Implementation MOU signed Design review workshops/Forum conducted Detailed Design Evaluation Meeting conducted Cost sharing arrangement agreed
1

Review Topic

Existin g Docum ent

Review Result

Project Plan approved and signed/Consultation with beneficiaries & other stakeholders O&M Plan/Manual prepared Registration of land use rights in (envisaged) command area completed Land use system & land size identified Marketing Assessment conducted Access to market identified (urban consumers) Availability of agricultural inputs supply markets Availability of basic social services (schools, Health, extension etc) Availability of agricultural supporting services (like micro credit) Hydrology Study and Investigation Review Topic Existin g Docum ent Review Result

Final

Data availability (years) Data quality/Missing data checking (methods) Water availability and use o Type of water source o Low/Base flow (l/s) and method of

measurement o Water balance for watershed prepared (Up- and downstream water use recorded) (Y/N) i.e. Does impact from U/S & on D/S users considered (not just on the spot only) or Is measured flow net or gross? NB: Design flow can be either base flow (if sufficient flow is available), or dependable flow i.e. 80% of mean monthly flow so that it can be supplementary irrigation project. Design rainfall estimation (l/s mm, criteria, method) Peak discharge estimation (l/s, criteria, method) If the SSI Scheme is existing o Existing water use for selected SSI scheme (l/s) o Existing command area (ha) of selected SSI scheme
2

Review Topic

Existin g Docum ent

Review Result

o Design flow for selected SSI scheme (l/s) o Planned command area (ha) of selected SSI

scheme Measured/estimated sediment load in river (heavy, moderate or low) especially for micro dam project Watershed management carried out in river catchment (Y/N) Land use land cover condition Type and level of land degradation Sediment load/Erosion rate and soil loss condition Catchment yield (runoff) Watershed management planned in river catchment (Y/N) Design of Head Works Review Topic Headworks: 1. Diversion Weir Topography, Geology and nature of river bed material of the headwork site Alternative sites and Minimum Site selection criteria Weir Crest Length (m) and its determination criteria Weir Elevation/ Height (m) and its determination criteria U/S water surface profile (Y/N) U/S water surface profile (Y/N) Design of Up- and downstream apron (Y/N) Design of diversion weir components (Y/N) Design of guide wall (Y/N) Design of flood bank/retaining wall (Y/N) Design of Divide wall (Y/N) Design of Head regulator and its gate (Y/N) Design of Head regulator gate (Y/N) Design of Under Sluice (Y/N) Design of Under Sluice gate (Y/N) Structural design or stability analysis (Y/N) Drawings: plan and section including layout Head works: 2. Micro Dam
Type Alternative

Existing Documen t

Review Result

sites

and

Minimum
3

Site

Review Topic selection criteria

Type Length (m) Height (m) Crest elevation (m) Crest width (m) Top Width (m) Bottom Width (m) Parapet elevation (m) Upstream face slope (H: V) Downstream face slope (H :V) Foundation Competent Rocks Maximum flood design (l/s) Capacity of spillway (l/s) Gated intake structure (Y/N)

Existing Documen t

Review Result

Head regulator (Y/N) Sluice gate (Y/N) Drawings: plan and section including layout Head works: 3. pump Source of Water (spring, river, ground water) Topography, Geology and nature of foundation material of the pump seat Alternative pump sites and Site selection criteria Static head, m Dynamic Head, m
NPSH computed (NB: Calculated NPSH must be NPSH to be supplied from the manufacturer ) Discharge Capacity (l/sec) Power requirement (hp) Selected pump type Pipe material (GRP, GI, HDPE, etc.) and

length, m

Max. velocity in suction pipe 2.0 m/s Can water be pumped over the expected range of water levels? Clearance between suction pipe inlet and the footer as well as the walls of concrete sumps should be at least two times pipe diameter Bell mouth suction inlet or screen with a plate Collection Chamber at end of delivery pipe Drawings: plan and section including layout

Head works: 4. Spring Protection Topography, Geology and nature of spring bed material and the headwork site
4

Review Topic
Alternative storage sites and Site selection

Existing Documen t u/s of

Review Result

criteria

Diversion

ditch/trench

designed

spring eye. Is designed collection chamber on the spot or d/s? If on the spot, designed spring protection box height should not be greater than existing maximum WL on the spring eye. Was this considered? Is there overflow? Outlet to storage or MC: Height to outlet 250mm Drainage works around the spring eye. Fencing around the protection work Washing basin and bathing area considered Cattle trough considered Drawings: plan and section including layout Irrigation Water Requirement Calculated maximum design supply (l/s) Irrigation duty (l/s/ha) Hours of irrigation per day Adopted irrigation efficiency (%) Peak water requirement for high water demanding crop (L/s/ha) and/or peak Etc (mm/day) Calculated maximum design supply (l/s) Irrigation Distribution System: Irrigation Canals and associated farm infrastructures Review Topic Existing Review Result Documen t Main Distribution System Type of geology and soil along the canal route Topography along the canal route Type of main distribution system Total length (m) and designed discharge (l/s) Measured/estimated level of seepage losses along canal alignment (high, moderate or low) Design criteria, hydraulic parameters and
5

formula used
Total length of lined section (m), n=0.018 Slope stability of embankment checked (If

flow is large) Total length with cover slaps Number of distribution boxes Number of chutes Number of aqueduct/flume Number of siphon Number of escape structures Number of gated secondary outlets Number of non-gated secondary outlets Number of gated tertiary outlets Number of non-gated tertiary outlets Number of drop structures Number of road culverts & Max. load carrying capacity Number of foot bridges& Max. load carrying capacity Number of animal drinking structures Number of washing structures Number of flow measurement devices Drawings: plan and section including layout Secondary Distribution System Type of geology and soil along the canal route Topography along the canal route Type of secondary distribution system Total length (m) and designed discharge (l/s) Measured/estimated level of seepage losses along canal alignment (high, moderate or low) Design criteria, hydraulic parameters and formula used Total length of lined sections (m) Number gated off takes Number non-gated off takes Number of drop structures Number of chutes Number of distribution boxes Number of chutes Number of aqueduct/flume Number of siphon No of turn outs Number of animal drinking structures Number of washing structures Drawings: plan and section including
6

layout Night Storage Reservoir Capacity Mm3 Treatments considered Gated outlet Overflow spillway Dead storage Drawings: plan and section including layout Tertiary Canals and field canals Number, design flow and length of tertiary and field canals No of turn outs Number of drop structures Number of chutes Number of cross-drainage structures Drawings: plan and section including layout Drainage System Drainage system incorporated (Y/N) Type of drainage system Length of main drain Number and length of collector drains Drawings: plan and section including layout Access Road Length (m) Width (m) Number of cross-drainage structures Number of bridges Drawings: plan and section including layout Command Area Review Topic
% of command area with vertisols

Existing Document

Review Result

(black cotton soil) % of command area with luvisols (red-brown soil) % of command area with slope of < 3% % of command area with slope of 3 to 5% % of command area with slope of 5 to 8% % of command area with slope of 8 to 12% % of command area with slope of >
7

Review Topic 12%

Detailed

Existing Document

Review Result

existing

cropping pattern

(Y/N) Detailed proposed cropping pattern (Y/N) Detailed existing crop yields (Y/N) Detailed proposed crop yields (Y/N) Gullies formed in command area (Y/N) Depth of groundwater table (m) Water logging problem (Y/N) - If Yes, % of command area Salinity problem (Y/N) - If Yes, % of command area Existin g Docum ent Review Result

Benefiting house holds Review Topic

Number

of existing irrigators/households with water rights - Number of female irrigators Number of households with water rights in proposed SSI Scheme - Number of female irrigators Average irrigable area per household (ha) in proposed SSI scheme Estimated Investment Costs and Financial Feasibility Review Topic Existin Review Result g Docum ent Mobilization and camping Head works Main distribution system Secondary distribution Drainage system Access road Other infrastructure Sub-Total Contingency (10-15%) Total Investment Cost VAT (15%) Total Cost With VAT Size of designed ICA (ha) Supervision and administration cost
8

Review Topic

Existin g Docum ent

Review Result

(5-7%) O&M cost (2-3%) Investment cost per ha ICA Annual Running Costs Land preparation Farming means (oxen or machinery) (Br) Input costs (for each crop) (Br) Seed Fertilizers Labour Cultural practice (seeding, weeding, cultivating & harvesting) O&M cost (2% of the initial investment cost) Overhead costs (Br) Water charge Land tax Sub-total Annual Running costs Contingency for O&M (10%) Total ARC Total Costs (Investment + ARC) Annual Production & Sales Revenue Total Production (for each crop) (qt) Production disposal (for each crop) (qt) Home consumption For market Reserve for seed Sales Revenue Unit farm gate price for each product (Br/qt) Total Sales revenue projection (Br) Net Revenue (Total revenue Total Costs) (Br) Net cash flow over the project years Calculated cost/benefit ratio (B/C or BCR) Calculated Internal rate of return (IRR %) Calculated Net present value (NPV %) Discount rate used is 10% Project life 20 years
9

ISSUES AND RECOMMENDED SOLUTIONS REPORTING REQUIRED HARD COPY SOFT COPY o MS word o Excel (Design sheet) o AutoCAD (Drawings)

10