Makromol. Chem., Theory Simul. 1,375385 (1992)
_{3}_{7}_{5}
Intramolecular phase separation of a copolymer chain with mobile primary structure
Elena E. Dormidontova, Alexander Yu. Grosberga),AIexei R. Khokhlov*
Physics Department, Moscow State University, Moscow 117234, Russia
(Date of receipt: May 18, 1992)
SUMMARY The phenomenon of intramolecular phase separation of a single copolymer chain with mobile primary structure (i. e., a polymer chain with reversibly adsorbable ligands) in dilute solution is investigated on the basis of a Florytype interpolation theory of the coilglobule phase transition. It is shown that under certain critical conditions the stability of the homogeneous primary structure is violated and intramolecular phase separation takes place. Phase diagrams for the cases of rigid and flexible chains are calculated. The main characteristics of a polymer chain in the two phase state (such as fraction of monomeric units, swelling coefficient and fraction of units with ligands for coexisting intramolecular phases) are investigated.
Introduction
Reversibleadsorption of lowmolecularweightcompounds (ligands) on monomeric units of polymer chains is a well known phenomenon of physics and chemistry of polymers and biopolymers Due to the reversibility of adsorption and hence the mobility of primary structure, such polymerligand complexes have a number of various specific properties. One of the most interesting of these properties is the possibility of intramolecular phase separation within the chain. The detailed investigation of this phenomenon is just the aim of the present paper. Below we will study the stability of the homogeneous state of a macromolecule (when the ligands are uniformly distributed along the chain) and determine the conditions under which intramolecular phase separation can take place. In addition to this we will analyze several properties of the intramolecularly separated state of a polymer chain (e. g. characteristics of coexisting phases). All consideration is concerned with a single polymer chain with mobile ligands in dilute solution. From the physical point of view such a polymer chain is _{a} heteropolymer (copolymer) with two kinds of monomeric units  with and without ligands. Interaction constants of these two kinds of units can be different. In addition to this, due to the reversibility of adsorption of ligands the primary structure of the chain (i. e. the sequence of monomeric units along the chain) is not fixed. It is due to this reason that intramolecular phase separation can occur in such a polymer chain. In the course of this phase separation both primary and spatial structures of the chain are simultaneously affected. An example of the phaseseparated state of _{a} chain is schematically depicted in Fig. 1. This picture corresponds to the case when the monomeric units with ligands attract each other, while the interaction of free
a) Institute of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117977, Russia.
@ 1992, Hiithig & Wepf Verlag, Basel
_{C}_{C}_{C} _{1}_{0}_{1}_{8}_{}_{5}_{0}_{5}_{4}_{/}_{9}_{2}_{/}_{$}_{0}_{3}_{.}_{O}_{0}
316
E. E. Dormidontova, A. Yu. Grosberg, A. R. Khokhlov
'id
Fig. 1. Intramolecular phase separation in a copolymer chain with mobile ligands _{(}_{0}_{:} free monomeric unit; 0 :
monomeric unit with adsorbed ligand)
units is repulsive, i. e. the solvent is selective. Then ligands will tend to concentrate on somesection of the chain with simultaneous contraction (globulization)of this section, while the other part of the chain, which includes only few monomeric units with ligands, will remain in the state of _{a} coil. For other interaction constants another case is possible when concentrating of ligands on some section of the globular chain leads to the formation of _{a} polymer coil in this section, while the main part of the chain is in the globular state. This coil formation of a polymer section, which otherwise would precipitate, may allow a chain to remain in solution under certain conditions. As it was noted above, the main reason for the possibility of intramolecular phase separation is the mobility of the onedimensional primary structure of the chain. On the other hand, according to the socalled Landau theorem _{'}_{)}_{,} phase separation in one dimensional systems with shortrange interactions is impossible. However, in the present case, due to the interrelation between primary and spatial structure the system is not purely onedimensional and the intramolecular phase separation becomes possible. The phenomenon of intramolecular phase separation of a copolymer with mobile primary structure has already been discussed in the literature'). However in ref. _{'}_{)} too crude assumptions were used. It was supposed that the coil phase is ideal, i. e. volume interactions are absent at all in this phase, while the globule phase is very dense. Below we will present a theory of intramolecular phase separation without using these assumptions. We will apply a Florytype interpolation theory which is approximately valid over the whole range of the swelling coefficient _{a} of a polymer chain: from the dense globule (a Q 1) to the swollen coil (a S l)93'0).
Free energy of a copolymer chain
Within the framework of a Florytype interpolation theory the free energy of a copolymer chain with mobile primary structure can be written in the following form:
F
= F,,
+ Fin,+ F,
(2.1)
Intramolecular phase separation of a copolymer chain with
377
The first term F,, characterizes the contribution which comes from the entropic elasticity of the polymer chain. It is expressed by93I0)
L
where a denotes the swelling coefficient of the polymer chain, a2 = (S2)/(S2),;(S2)is the actual meansquare radius of gyration of the macromolecule, and (S2), is the radius of gyration in the absence of interaction of units. The first term in Eq. (2.2) is responsible for the entropy loss in the course of the chain swellingwhile the second term describes the entropy loss from the chain contraction. The second term Fin,in the expression (2.1)is the free energy of volume interactions in the polymer chain. In the case of a small average concentration of monomeric units the virial expansion can be used. In refs. lr,12) it was shown that for the description of the coilglobule transition it is sufficient to take into account the second and third virial terms. We will adopt the same approach in the present paper. Let us denote the monomeric units with adsorbed ligands by the index 1and free units by the index f. There will be three second virial coefficients B,,,B,,, B,,, and third virial coefficients C,,,, C,,,,C,,and Cfff.For simplicity let us suppose that all third virial coefficients are identical
As to the second virial coefficients we will consider the case which is most interesting from the practical point of view when there are strong forces of attraction between the monomeric units with adsorbed ligands, while all other interactions are determined mainly by repulsion forces. Thus we will assume that
B,, =
kB
B,, = Bff =
B
> 0
_{(}_{2}_{.}_{4}_{)}
where k denotes the coefficient which characterizes the relative strength of the forces of attraction between units with ligands. In Eq. (2.4) we assumed that B,, = B, just to simplify the subsequent analysis (analogously to the supposition _{(}_{2}_{.}_{3}_{)}_{)}_{.} In this case the expression for the free energy of volume interaction Fin,can be written as
where N is the number of units in the chain, p the fraction of units with adsorbed ligands, V, = B/a3, V, = C1I2/a3;a is the average distance between neighboring monomeric units of the polymer chain. In ref. _{l}_{o}_{)} it was shown that the parameters _{V}_{,} and V, characterize, as a matter of fact, the chain stiffness. For flexible chains, Vi= 1, V, t: 1, while for stiff enough chains these parameters are much smaller than unity.
378
E. E. Dormidontova, A. Yu. Grosberg, A. R. Khokhlov
Finally, the third term F, in Eq. (2.1) is connected with the entropy of redistribu tion of ligands on the polymer chain (i. e. with the mobility of the primary structure)
F, =
TS
=
TlnW
= TN.fJlnp + (1  P)ln(l
 p))
_{(}_{2}_{.}_{6}_{)}
where W is the number of all possible primary structures (W = N!/[(PN)!(N.(1 
P))!II.
Phaseuniform states of a polymer chain
To analyze phaseuniform states of the polymer chain, let us determine at first the value of the swelling coefficient a for such states. It is given by the free energy Fdefined in the previous section. The equilibrium value of _{a} corresponds simply to the minimum of E From the minimization condition dF/da = 0 we obtain
a5 
a

VS/a3 =
V, .N’/’. (1 (k
+ 1)p’)
_{(}_{3}_{.}_{1}_{)}
As it can be seen from this equation, the values of the parameters V, and V, determine the qualitative form of the dependence a (P, k, N). For the case of rather large values of V2 (V2 > 1/60’”) which corresponds to flexible chainsI0) the functional dependence of @(a)= as  a  Vi/a3on the swelling coefficient a is a monotonously increasing function (Fig. 2a), while for the case of rigid chains (V, _{<} 1/60’”) lo) the corresponding curve is not monotone (Fig. 2 b) and the plot of the function @(a)contains a region, where (dqVda) < 0, i.e. (d’F/da’) < 0. In this region the uniform state of the macromolecule is unstable and the jumplike coil globule transition from high to low values _{o}_{f} _{a} is performed in order to avoid this region.
Fig. 2. Plot of @(a)= a5 
a  v$/a3as a function of the swelling coefficient a for flexible (curve a) and rigid (curve b) chains
Intramolecular phase separation of a copolymer chain with
319
Thus, for a chain with statistically uniform distribution of ligands the macromolecu lar collapse occurs as a standard coilglobule transition, where the role of _{a} relative temperature deviation from the 6point in the usual transition (see ref. _{l}_{o}_{)}_{)} is played by the value
Teff
=
1
(k
+ I)/.?*
_{(}_{3}_{.}_{2}_{)}
Let us now address to the investigation of the problem of stability of phaseuniform states. To obtain stability conditions, let us determine the chemical potential _{p} of monomeric units with ligands.
In terms of chemical potential the stability condition assumes the form
The plots of the chemical potentialp as a function of the fraction of monomeric units with ligands pare shown in Fig. 3 (for flexible chains) and in Fig. 4 (for rigid chains). Fig. 3 demonstrates that the value k (see Eq. (2.4)) essentially influences the form of
Fig. 3. Chemical potential of monomeric units with
ligands as a function of B for a flexible copolymer chain
lo4) for
different values of k (the values of k are shown near the correspondingcurves)
(v, =
V, =
1; N
=
h
k
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
\i
3 80
.I
k
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
E. E. Dormidontova, A. Yu. Grosberg, A. R. Khokhlov
Fig. 4.
of monomeric units with ligands as a function of 3/ for a rigid copolymer chain _{(}_{V}_{,}
Chemical potential
=
vz = O,OI; N =
lo4) for
different values of k (the values of k are shown near the corresponding curves)
this dependence and plays an important role in the determination of the stability conditions for the phaseuniform state of _{a} macromolecule. For the case of flexible chains (i. e. Vz > 1/60”2), the situation is the following. When k < k,, the curves of dependence of the chemical potentialp on the fraction of monomeric units with ligands /3 are monotonously increasing. This means that phaseuniform states of polymer
chains are stable. When
(($)N < 0). In this region phaseuniform the state of a polymer chain loses
stability and intramolecular phase separation takes place. The larger the attractive forces in the system (i.e. the larger k), the wider the range of values of p at which intramolecular separation occurs. For the case of rigid chains (V2 < 1/60”2, i.e. not all the values of a can be realized) the instability region corresponds to the interval where the following two inequalities are fulfilled: (d@/da2)lr,N _{<} 0, (d2F/d/32),,N _{<} 0. As it follows from Fig. 2b for the case of rigid chains a range of _{p} values for which _{(}_{d}_{2}_{F}_{/}_{d}_{a}_{2}_{)}_{l}_{r}_{,}_{N}_{<} 0 exists at all the values of attraction forces in the polymer system. However this range of fl values can partially or completely lie outside the interval of physically reasonable values of /3 (0 I p I 1). Thus, it is natural to regard the largest value of the parameter k, at which the corresponding instable region of j? turns out to lie completely outside
k 2 k,, the corresponding curves contain a region where
Intramolecular phase separation of a copolymer
chain with
381
the interval 0 5 fl .I 1, as the critical point, k,,, for the case V, < 1 /601'2 under con sideration (i. e. the critical point has coordinates (kc,;p,, = 1) in the phase diagram). In other respects.the qualitative behavior of the chemical potential depending on the values of the parameters (k;p) is analogous to the case of flexible chains.
Region of absolute instability, spinodal for intramolecular phase separation
Now, let us consider in detail the spinodal for intramolecular phase separation. This curve is the boundary of absolute instability of the phaseuniform state of the polymer. For the case of flexible chains the spinodal equation is defined from the condition (d2F/dP2) = 0. Taking into consideration Eq. (3.1) this condition can be written as
k + 1
2v,7 
u
N"'
12(k + 1)2p v:
5a8  ad,+ 3Vi
+
B.(l
1
 8)
=o
(4.1)
The solution of this equation (spinodal) for the case of flexible chains is shown in Fig. 5 (the dashed curve).
k
0.66
0.61
0.62
Fig. 5. Phase diagram for a flexible copolymer chain
0.60
(v,
The regions of the phase diagram labeled _{1}_{,} 2 and _{3} correspond to a uniform coil, the intramolecular phase separation region and _{a} uniform globule, respectively. The dashed curve is the spinodal of the phase separation region. The dot anddash line indicates the
coilglobule transition _{0}_{.}_{5}_{1}
=
v, = 1; N
= 103.
0.58
0.56
0.75
\
0.80
0.85
0.90
P
382
kI
0.6 
0.5 
0.3 
0.2 
0.1 
0k/
0.80
1
I
0.85
E. E. Dormidontova, A. Yu. Grosberg, A. R. Khokhlov
I
0.90
0.95
I
1.00
P
for a rigid copolymer chain (V, = 0,06; V2 = 0,05;
N = lo4). The regions of the
phase diagram labeled _{1}_{,} 2 and 3 and the dotanddash line have the same meaning
as in Fig. 5. The dashed curve is the spinodal curve corresponding to the loss of stability of the spatial structure of the chain as a whole. The line ( o ) is the spinodal curve corresponding to the loss of stability of uniform distribution along the chain
For the case of rigid chains the boundary of the instability region is defined from the conditions (d2F/da2)8,N= 0, (d2F/d/3’),,., = 0. As we can see from Fig. 4, the left branch of the spinodal, corresponding to the transition from the phase of uniform coil to the instability region can be determined in fact from the equation (d2F/da2)8,N = 0. Since this equation has two solutions for the case of rigid chains (see previous section, Fig. 2b), there are two different spinodal curves (Fig. 6). One of these spinodal curves is connected with the loss of stability of the uniform distribution of ligands along the chain. Another spinodal curve corresponds to the loss of stability of the spatial structure of the chain as a whole. After the determination of the boundaries of absolute instability of the uniform state of a polymer chain, we proceed now to the investigation of the conditions of phase separation.
The conditions of phase separation
To determine the boundaries of the separation region (i.e. the binodal curve) ordinary conditions of phase equilibrium should be considered
Intramolecular phase separation of a copolymer chain with
383
where pi,p2,pi, p2 are chemical potentials of ligands and “pressures” in both phases, correspondingly. It should be noted that in this case the role of “pressure” p is played by the value thermodynamically conjugated to the contour length of the chain (more exactly the contour length of the chain section corresponding to a given phase):
P= (z)=
8,N
V, ‘(1 + 3(k + l)/12)/(2a3Nil2)+ In(1  p)
(5.2)
One would think that for determining characteristics of the phaseseparated state of
2
the polymer chain it is possible to use the Maxwell rule in the form: SPdp
However in the present case the free energy of a polymer chain (see Eqs. (2.1), (2.2), (2.5) and (2.6)) is not an additive function of the number of monomeric units in the chain (a change in the number of units in the chain influences both the contour length of the chain and the volume interactions in the whole system). Thus, since the Maxwell rule cannot be applied it is necessary to solve numerically the set of equations (5.1). After determining the values p,, p2, pi, p2 the total system of equations to be solved takes the form
=
0.
vi 1
+ 3(k + 1)&
2a:.N,’/~
+ ln(1

8,) =
V,
1 + 3(k + 1)& 2a: 1 Nil2
_{+} _{I}_{n}_{(}_{1}
_{}
_{8}_{2}_{)}
81.N, + 82.N2 = PN
N,
+ N2 =
N
where a,, N, *PI,at, N2.f12 denote the swelling coefficient, degree of polymerization and the fraction of monomeric units with ligands in the first and second phase, respectively.
Phase diagram. Analysis of intramolecular phase separation in the polymer chain
Based on the numerical solution of the system of equations (5.3)the boundaries of the separation region (binodal curve) were found and phase diagrams were determined (seeFig. 5 for flexiblechains and Fig. 6 for rigid chains). These phase diagrams contain
_{3}_{8}_{4}
E. E. Dormidontova, A. Yu. Grosberg, A. R. Khokhlov
the region of stability of phaseuniform states of a polymer chain  the coil (region 1) and the globule (region 3), which are separated from each other by the line of coil globule transition and the region of intramolecular phase separation (region 2). Region 2 is separated from regions 1 and 3 by the binodal curves; the corresponding spinodal curves are shown in Figs. _{5} and 6 as well. As it is pointed out above the phase behavior of flexible and rigid chains is different
 instability and subesequent phase separation arises in the rigid and flexible chains at different conditions and by different reasons. But in spite of this distinction, the change of characteristics of a chain under the transition from the uniform state (e. g. coil phase) to the separated state and then from the separated state to the other uniform state (e. g. globule phase) occurs in the same manner. From the analysis of the variation of the parameters _{o}_{f} the chain, we can draw the following picture of structural changes under transition, e. g. from a uniform coil phase to a uniform globule phase through the stage of intramolecular phase separation. These
""10.6
r" 0.90
c'
0.86

p
I2

<
2

0,82
0.78
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.1
0.2
4
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
(b)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0 

( 
5 
0.80 
0.85 
0.90 
r3
Fig. 7. Main characteristics of the phaseseparated state of a flexible copolymer chain with V, = Vz = 1; N = lo4; k =
0,65: swelling coefficients a and a2 (a), fractions of monomeric units with ligands _{8}_{,}_{a}_{n}_{d} _{P}_{z} (b)
and fractions of units Nl/N and
N2/N (c) as functions of
Intramolecular phase separation of a copolymer chain with . , .
385
conformational transformations of the copolymer chain are illustrated by Fig. 7. The curves in Fig. 7 correspond to the flexiblecopolymer chain for which the phase diagram
7c are the plots of swelling coefficients, fractions of
monomeric units with ligands, and fractions of units in the coexisting phases as functions of fl, respectively. Originally, a small (by length) section of the chain forms the conformation of a weakly contracted globule. The phase state of the greater part of the chain remains almost invariable. With the growth of the fraction of monomeric units occupied by ligands, fl, the length of the globular section increases and an increasing fraction of ligands is concentrated in it. Therefore, the density of the globule becomes considerably higher. The other part _{o}_{f} the chain loses an increasing number
is shown in Fig. 5. Figs. 7a, 7 b,
of ligands and becomes more swollen. This process continues with further increase in fl until the whole chain appears in the globule state. Near the boundary of the uniform globular phase the phaseseparated system represents _{a} picture inverse to that which is observed near the boundary of the uniform coil phase, i. e., before the transition into the globule phase the phaseseparated polymer chain consists of a small coil section and a much larger section forming a dense globule.
.
’) M. D. FrankKamenetskii, Mol. Biol. (Moscow) 2, 408 (1968) )’ A. A. Vedenov, A. M. Dykhne, M. D. FrankKamenetskii, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 105, 479 (1971) ’) A. S. Zasedatelev, T. V. Gurskii, M. V. Volkenstein, Mol. Biol. (Moscow) 5, 1345 (1971) 4, J. D. McGhee, Biopolymers 15, 1345 (1976) A. A. Akhrem, D. Y. Lando, Mol. Biol. (Moscow) 13, 1098 (1979) )‘ A. A. Akhrem, D. Y. Lando, A. G. Spakovskii, Y. D. Nechipurenko, S. G. Arutunian, Mol.
’)
Biol. (Moscow) 24, 649 (1990) ’) L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, “Statisticheskaia Fizika”, Nauka, Moscow, 3rd edition, 1976, part 1, p. 582 8, A. Yu. Grosberg, Biofizika 29, 596 (1984)
)’ T. M. Birshtein, V. A. Pryamitsyn,
Vysokomol. Soedin., Ser. A: 29, 1858 (1987)
lo) 
A. Yu. Grosberg, A. R. Khokhlov, “StatisticalPhysicsof Macromolecules”, Nauka, Moscow 
‘I) 
1989, pp. 89 99 I. M. Lifshitz, A. Yu. Grosberg, A. R. Khokhlov, Zh. Eksp. =or. Fiz. 71, 1634 (1976) 
12) 
I. M. Lifshitz, A. Yu. Grosberg, A. R. Khokhlov, Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, 683 (1978) 
Viel mehr als nur Dokumente.
Entdecken, was Scribd alles zu bieten hat, inklusive Bücher und Hörbücher von großen Verlagen.
Jederzeit kündbar.