Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
North
American
Society
for
Sport
Management
Conference
(NASSM
2010)
Using
A
Configurational
Research
Approach
to
Assess
the
Structure
of
National
Governing
Bodies
of
Sport
Adam
Karg,
Deakin
University
Paul
Turner
(Advisor),
Deakin
University
David
Shilbury
(Advisor),
Deakin
University
Organizational
theory/culture
Abstract
2010-107
The evolution of sport national governing bodies (NGBs) from traditional to professional structures is a recurrent feature of the evolution of national sport systems (Madella, Bayle, & Tome, 2005, p. 207). With NGBs globally progressing towards more business like operations and structures (Madella et al., 2005; Stewart, 2007), the modern NGB is represented by diverse functional units operating within complex environments, networks and systems. Bayle and Robinson (2007) presented the organizational structure of modern NGBs as functional with varied differentiation across predominantly three areas; administration, sporting and finally, communication and development which includes promotion and marketing. It is the complexity presented by these differentiated functions which has generated a need to identify and understand structural frameworks of NGBs and how they are configured to best achieve performance. Structural and operational differences between individual NBG sub units require integration across the NGB to ensure it operates as a functional organization. The relationship between differentiation and integration is often central to organizational tension and crisis (Lawrence & Lorsch, 1967), which can develop into strategic issues that impact organizational performance. As such, adequate integration has considerable positive implications for sport organizations, their functioning and the achievement of outcomes. Alternatively, tensions or conflicts arising from a lack of integration can potentially hinder organizational performance. Understanding how separate and potentially conflicting functions act and interact to produce performance (Bayle & Robinson, 2007), as well as where issues or tensions may emerge in the interplay of sub units, therefore represent important and underdeveloped research outcomes for sport organizations. Applying a configurational research approach permits a theoretical framework under which complex organizations such as NBGs and their functioning can be addressed. Using this approach, the organization is viewed as a system of parts, with components and interrelations between components considered. The approach corresponds with a specific epistemological and methodological approach which seeks to articulate the relationships between internal variables of the organization and those within the environment (Meyer et al., 1993, p. 1178). When investigating structure using a configurational approach, structural variables are defined as differentiation and integration (Dow, 1988; Lawrence & Lorsch, 1967). As such, the design of the organization is dependent on two attributes of structural design: the division of tasks into subgroups (differentiation) and the integration of the subgroups towards a functional organizational unit. While forms of integration and differentiation have been recognised in the body of work on sport organizational structure (Gomez, Opato, & Marti, 2008) the concepts of differentiation and integration have been little examined within sporting organizations, and therefore create areas of investigation by which the strategic nature, structure and functioning of sport organizations can be assessed. This study investigated three such areas of NGB structure and functioning. Firstly, the research defined the characteristics of differentiation present across NBG functions or sub units. Secondly, it assessed the requisite need for integration and the mechanisms NGBs use to achieve integration. Finally, an agenda of strategic issues based on imbalances between differentiation and integration was developed. The identification and treatment of these strategic issues provides insight into future strategic and structural decisions of NBGs, and sport organizations more widely. Research using the configurational approach is generally undertaken through case studies given the level of intra- organizational analysis involved. In the case of national sport systems, each NGB is considered a configuration of resources (Snow, Miles & Miles, 2005), which is designed and evolves to best cope with its individual environment. Data collection methods included the use of documentation, ranking tools adapted from previous studies, and in- depth interviews with CEOs, general managers, operational staff and board members. Within this approach, the variables of differentiation and integration were assessed using an adaptation of past approaches (Lawrence &
Tampa, Florida
June 1 5, 2010
Page 350
2010
North
American
Society
for
Sport
Management
Conference
(NASSM
2010)
Lorsch,
1967).
This
included
in-depth
interviews
to
gain
detailed
qualitative
insight
into
the
research
issues
in
order
to
complement
prior,
more
positivist
approaches
to
assessing
sport
organizations
structures
(Kikulis,
Slack,
Hinings
&
Zimmermann,
1989;
Slack
&
Hinings,
1987:
Theodoraki
&
Henry,
1994).
Results
obtained
from
a
pilot
study
of
one
Australian
NBG
provide
initial
insight
into
NGB
structure
and
functioning.
Findings
discovered
sources
of
differentiation
in
the
levels
of
formal
structure,
goal
orientations
and
operating
environments
of
sub
units,
with
the
need
for
integration
varying
between
sub
units
based
on
task
dependence
and
operational
requirements.
Strategic
issues
based
on
the
interplay
of
differentiation
and
integration
were
identified
in
prior
and
current
operations
of
the
NBG.
These
are
summarised
as
issues
with
conflicting
goal
orientations,
control
and
distribution
of
hierarchical
power,
interpersonal
differences,
lack
of
role
clarity
and
cross
functional
job
knowledge,
difficulty
aligning
with
expanded
operating
networks
of
the
sport,
and
geographic
dispositions
of
sub
units.
The
organization
showed
examples
of
the
use
of
mutual
adjustment,
strategic
planning,
standardisation
of
processes,
information
and
communications
technology,
and
efforts
to
better
develop
organizational
culture
as
integration
mechanisms
to
achieve
functionality
within
the
organization.
When
implemented,
these
mechanisms
demonstrated
positive
effects
on
the
functioning
of
the
organization.
Overall,
these
results
suggest
differentiation
and
integration
are
both
present
within
NGBs
and
effective
as
a
source
for
identifying
and
responding
to
strategic
issues.
While
representing
an
initial
phase
of
discovery,
the
pilot
showed
achieved
integration
within
NGBs
had
a
positive
impact
on
organizational
functioning
or
institutional
efficiency,
which
is
one
dimension
of
performance
for
all
organizations.
Results
are
presented
and
refinements
made
to
the
research
approach
will
guide
the
next
phase
of
case
studies.
This
will
enable
the
initial
findings,
which
confirm
and
characterise
the
structural
concepts
of
differentiation
and
integration,
to
be
supported.
The
pilot
research,
coupled
with
future
research
cases,
seek
to
demonstrate
the
potential
effectiveness
of
balancing
differentiation
and
integration
to
attain
functional
and
high
performing
NGBs.
Bayle,
E.,
&
Robinson,
L.,
(2007).
A
Framework
for
Understanding
the
Performance
of
National
Governing
Bodies
of
Sport.
European
Sport
Management
Quarterly,
7(3),
249-268.
Dow,
G.,
(1988).
Configurational
and
Coactivational
Views
of
Organizational
Structure.
Academy
of
Management
Review,
13(1),
53-64.
Gomez,
S.,
Opato,
M.,
&
Marti,
C.
(2008).
Structural
Characteristics
of
Sport
Organizations:
Main
trends
in
the
academic
discussion.
Working
paper
730,
IESE
Business
School,
Madrid.
Kikulis,
Slack,
Hinings,
&
Zimmermann,
1989;
.
"A
Structural
Taxonomy
of
Amateur
Sport
Organisations."
Journal
of
Sport
Management,
3,
129-150.
Lawrence
P.R.,
&
Lorsch,
J.W.,
(1967).
Differentiation
and
Integration
in
Complex
Organizations.
Administrative
Science
Quarterly,
1-47.
Madella,
A.,
Bayle,
E.,
&
Tome,
J,
(2005).
The
organisational
performance
of
national
swimming
federations
in
Mediterranean
countries:
A
comparative
approach.
European
Journal
of
Sport
Science,
5(4),
207-220.
Meyer,
A.
D.,
Tsui,
A.S.
&
Hinings,
C.
R.
(1993).
"Configurational
Approaches
to
Organizational
Analysis."
Academy
of
Management
Review,
36(6),
1175-1195.
Slack,
T.
&
B.
Hinings
(1994).
"Institutional
Pressures
and
Isomorphic
Change:
An
Empirical
Test."
Organizational
Studies,
15(6),
803-827.
Snow,
C.C.,
Miles,
R.
E.,
&
Miles
G.,
(2005).
A
configurational
approach
to
the
integration
of
strategy
and
organization
research.
Strategic
Organization,
3(4),
431-439.
Stewart,
B.,
(2007).
The
Games
are
not
the
Same:
The
Political
Economy
of
Football
in
Australia.
Melbourne:
Melbourne
University
Publishing
Limited.
Tampa, Florida
June 1 5, 2010
Page 351
2010
North
American
Society
for
Sport
Management
Conference
(NASSM
2010)
Theodoraki,
E.
&
I.
Henry
(1994).
"Organisational
Structures
and
Contexts
in
British
National
Governing
Bodies
of
Sport."
International
Review
for
Sociology
of
Sport,
29(3),
243-265.
Thibault,
L.,
&
Slack
T.,
(1994).
Strategic
Planning
for
Nonprofit
Sport
Organizations:
Empirical
Verification
of
a
Framework.
Journal
of
Sport
Management,
8,
218-233.
Thibault,
L.,
Slack,
T.,
&
Hinings,
B.,
(1993).
A
Framework
of
the
Analysis
of
Strategy
in
Nonprofit
Sport
Organizations.
Journal
of
Sport
Management,
7,
25-43.
Tampa, Florida
June 1 5, 2010
Page 352