IPA Use Only Project Number: . Module ID: (Choose one). Analysis Type: . Version: .

Project Name:.

Field Name: .

Reservoir Module Reservoir Evaluation

Reservoir Evaluation Strategy

1. How would you describe the reservoir evaluation schedule and strategy with respect to facilities front-end engineering and design? (Check one)
1 2 3

Sequential Overlapped Phased

a) If overlapped, which of the descriptions below best describes the nature of overlapping? (Check one) Partial overlap and non-integrated (wholly separate teams) 2 Partial overlap and partial integration 3 Full overlap and full integration
1

Geophysical Data Evaluation

1. What seismic coverage is available? (Check all that apply) 2D grid 3D volume 4D volumes 2D multi-component 3D multi-component

2. Are there overburden problems leading to: Depth conversion difficulties? Migration problems/structural distortion? Amplitude or attribute distortion? January 2002 IPA Confidential Document Page 1 of 7
1 1 1

Yes Yes Yes

0 0 0

No No No Reservoir Module Reservoir Evaluation

Reservoir imaging problems?

Yes

No

Please elaborate on any Yes answers above: . 3. Have amplitudes or attributes (including AVO and inversions) been analyzed?
1

Yes

No

If yes, please answer the following: Are hydrocarbon indicators present? Can hydrocarbon distributions be mapped? Can reservoir architecture and geometry be mapped? Can the attributes be inverted to reservoir properties?
1 1 1 1

Yes Yes Yes Yes

0 0 0 0

No No No No

4. Please rate the clarity of the seismic imaging of the reservoir architecture and reservoir geometry: Excellent 1 2 Moderate 3 4 Poor 5

5. Please rate the ability to seismically map reservoir quality and reservoir properties: Excellent 1 2 Moderate 3 4 Poor 5

6. Please rate the overall quality of the seismic data and usefulness of the seismic interpretation: Excellent 1 2 Moderate 3 4 Poor 5

Geologic Data Evaluation

Log Data 1. How many wells are available for log analysis? .

January 2002 IPA Confidential Document

Page 2 of 7

Reservoir Module Reservoir Evaluation

2. Is the log analysis complete?

1

Yes

No

3. How critical is the log analysis to the overall reservoir evaluation?. Very Critical 1 2 Moderate 3 4 Not Critical 5

4. Are there any problems with: Porosity or permeability calculations? Pay zone identification? Reservoir unit correlation? Water saturation calculation?
1 1 1 1

Yes Yes Yes Yes

0 0 0 0

No No No No

Please elaborate on any Yes answers above: .

Core Data 1. How many wells are available for core analysis? . 2. Please describe available core: (Check all that apply) Side wall core from some reservoirs Side wall core from all reservoirs Conventional core from some reservoirs Conventional core from all reservoirs 3. Please identify the types of core analysis performed: (Check all that apply) Special Core Analysis (SCAL) Capillary pressure Wettability Relative permeability 4. Is the core analysis complete?
1

Sedimentology Clay mineralogy Porosity

Yes

No

5. How critical is the core analysis to the overall reservoir evaluation? January 2002 IPA Confidential Document Page 3 of 7 Reservoir Module Reservoir Evaluation

Very Critical 1 2

Moderate 3 4

Not Critical 5

6. Are there any core analysis problems with: Porosity or permeability calculations? Pay zone identification? Reservoir unit correlation? Water saturation calculation? Depositional environment interpretation? Please elaborate on any Yes answers above: .
1 1 1 1 1

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

0 0 0 0 0

No No No No No

Fluid Data Evaluation

1. How well defined are the fluids? (Select only one) Production history or early production system 2 Definitive well tests from major reservoirs 3 Some testing and analysis 4 Analog data 5 Assumed
1

2. How many wells are available for fluid analysis? .

January 2002 IPA Confidential Document

Page 4 of 7

Reservoir Module Reservoir Evaluation

3. Are fluid samples available? All major flow units Yes

1 1 1 1

Available Yes Oil Gas Condensate/NGL Water

1 1 1 1

Analyzed Yes
1 1 1 1

No
0 0 0 0

No
0 0 0 0

No
0 0 0 0

Fluid Not Present

9 9 9 9

4. What types of analyses have been performed (Check all that apply)? PVT/Phase behavior Geochemical 3 Recombination
1 2

5. Do fluid properties vary areally or vertically?

1

Yes

No

6. Do you expect the fluid properties to vary with time?

1

Yes

No

If yes, please explain. 7. Are pressure data available?

1

Yes

No

a) Within the field from all major flow units? the oil leg? the gas leg? the water leg?
1 1 1 1

Yes Yes Yes Yes

0 0 0 0

No No No No

9 9 9

Oil Not Present Gas Not Present Water Not Present

8. Are there any fluid analysis problems with: January 2002 IPA Confidential Document Page 5 of 7 Reservoir Module Reservoir Evaluation

Identifying compartments? Correlating flow units? Understanding flow properties? Phase behavior? GOR, CGR, liquid yields? Sample contamination?

1 1 1 1 1 1

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

0 0 0 0 0 0

No No No No No No

Please elaborate on any Yes answers above: .

Data Interpretation, Integration, and Reservoir Modeling

1. Has a full, integrated 3D geologic model been developed incorporating all well, seismic and fluids data?
1

Yes

No

a) Were fluid flow units used to simplify the model?

1

Yes

No

2. Has a full 3D reservoir simulation been completed?

1

Yes

No

Underway

3. Did the simulation test the sensitivity of the following? (Check all that apply) Drive mechanism Recovery factors Reserve estimates Secondary recovery opportunities Well placement Per well production Overall depletion strategy Production forecasts

4. Was a history match performed?

1

Yes

No

No historical data

a) What data were history matched? . b) What was the duration of the history match? .(Choose one)

5. Please rate the quality of the 3D simulation. January 2002 IPA Confidential Document Page 6 of 7 Reservoir Module Reservoir Evaluation

Excellent 1 2

Moderate 3 4

Poor 5

January 2002 IPA Confidential Document

Page 7 of 7

Reservoir Module Reservoir Evaluation